SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

Similar documents
AN ESTIMATE OF YOUR SHARE OF THE SETTLEMENT IS SET FORTH ON THE GREEN CLAIM FORM.

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND HEARING DATE FOR COURT APPROVAL

ORDER OF THE COURT NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT; SETTLEMENT HEARING; AND CLAIM AND EXCLUSION PROCEDURES

THIS NOTICE MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT THE COURT OR THE COURT CLERK REGARDING THIS MATTER

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT AND HEARING DATE FOR COURT APPROVAL

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT:

If you are or were employed by Farmers Insurance Exchange as a claims representative, a class action settlement may affect your rights.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

FName LName Addr1 Addr2 City, St Zip-Zip4

D sa et al. v. Amber India Corp., et al San Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT YOU MAY BE REQUIRED TO FILE A CLAIM FORM. NOT ALL CLASS MEMBERS ARE REQUIRED TO FILE A CLAIM FORM.

NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT & FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

*Barcode39* - <<SequenceNo>>

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL CIVIL WEST ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. THIS NOTICE MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS.

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT:

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF FRESNO

WORKWEEK DISPUTE FORM

SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SOLANO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

NOTICE FOR PRODCO, FTP, MARVEL, HOP SKIP & JUMP, ABC STUDIOS & FILM 49 PRODUCTIONS, INC. PARKING PRODUCTION ASSISTANT CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION RYBAKOV v. BISSELL BROS., INC.

U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS Williams v. Wells Fargo, Case No. 1:14-cv-01981

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Garcia, et al. v. Lowe s et al. Superior Court, County of San Diego, Case No. GIC

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles RITE AID PHARMACIST WAGE AND HOUR CASES Case No. J.C.C.P CLAIM FORM

AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF PROPOSED COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT

Case 5:16-cv NC Document Filed 04/20/18 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT 1

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

STATE OF NEW MEXICO COUNTY OF BERNALILLO SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT. Plaintiff, Case No. CV

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-DIMITROULEAS

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

DELCARATION OF ELIZABETH DITIRRO IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL

SUMMARY OF YOUR OPTIONS AND THE LEGAL EFFECT OF EACH OPTION APPROVE THE

Superior Court of the State of Washington, Yakima County

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AS YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS MAY BE AFFECTED.

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING

THIS NOTICE IS DIRECTED TO:

Your Legal Rights and Options in this Settlement

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

The only way to get a payment. NO LATER THAN MARCH 10, 2011 EXCLUDE YOURSELF NO LATER THAN MARCH 10, 2011 SUBMIT A CLAIM FORM

SecurePlus Provider universal life insurance policy SecurePlus Paragon universal life insurance policy. a class action lawsuit may affect your rights.

SUMMARY OF YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THE SETTLEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky (Covington) LEGAL NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS, ROBERT AGUIRRE, IRVING BEL TRAN, JAKE SERENO, 5 RONALD BEREND, KEITH BISPO

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING

*Barcode39* - <<SequenceNo>>

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION. Case No. A-06-CA-726-SS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

DELL SERVICE CONTRACT TAX REFUND CLAIMS SETTLEMENT ( SBE Settlement )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTHERN DIVISION FRANZ SCHLEICHER, et al., Plaintiffs, No. 02 CV 1332 TWP-TAB.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 2:09-cv EFM-KMH Document Filed 03/30/15 Page 1 of 43 EXHIBIT A-1

UCB, Inc. Defined Benefit Pension Plan Litigation NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: SUBMIT A CLAIM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND FINAL SETTLEMENT HEARING

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

DELL SERVICE CONTRACT TAX SETTLEMENT ( Dell Settlement )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS (HOUSTON DIVISION) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

IF YOU BOUGHT A PLAYSTATION 3 CONSOLE BETWEEN NOVEMBER 1, 2006, AND APRIL 1, 2010, THIS CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE. Co-Beneficial Owner s First Name MI Co-Beneficial Owner s Last Name

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

1. Why did I get this letter? 2. What is this lawsuit about? 3. Why is this a class action? 4. Why is there a Settlement?

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

Case 3:09-cv N-BQ Document 201 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID 3204

In re Lidoderm Antitrust Litigation United States District Court for the Northern District of California Master Docket No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Wornicki, et al. v. Brokerpriceopinion.com, et al. Case No. 1:13-CV PAB-KMT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT in WAWA ESOP LITIGATION Pfeifer v. Wawa, Inc. et al, Case No (E.D. Pa.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (BALTIMORE DIVISION) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

EXHIBIT A TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No. 2:17-cv KJN NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

United States District Court

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES, AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

<<mail id>> <<Name1>> <<Name2>> <<Address1>> <<Address2>> <<City>><<State>><<Zip>> <<Foreign Country>>

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL FAIRNESS HEARING

United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

Dear Investor: Instructions, Page 1

Transcription:

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO RICARDO SANCHEZ, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, and on behalf of the general public, CASE NO. CIVDS1702554 v. Plaintiffs, NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT EXACT STAFF, INC. and DOES 1 through 100, Defendant. To: All non-exempt employees of Exact Staff, Inc. ( Exact Staff ) who were employed in California and were assigned to work at Target Distribution Centers in California at any time between February 10, 2013 and July 31, 2018 ( Class Period ). If you fall within this definition, you are a Settlement Class Member. PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY IT MAY AFFECT YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO MONEY FROM THIS SETTLEMENT I. INTRODUCTION A proposed class action settlement (the Settlement ) of the above-captioned action (the Action ) pending in the California Superior Court for the County of San Bernardino (the Court ), has been reached by the parties and has been granted preliminary approval by the Court supervising the Action. A final fairness hearing regarding the settlement will be held on November 13, 2018 to determine whether the Settlement should be granted final approval. Records of Exact Staff show that you were employed by Exact Staff as a non-exempt employee in California and were assigned to work at Target Distribution Centers in California during the Class Period, as defined above, and therefore may be eligible to participate in this Settlement. As a Settlement Class Member, you are entitled to money under the Settlement, and you will be sent checks, unless you opt out of participating in the settlement. The settlement affects your legal rights, and the purpose of this Notice is to: (1) describe the Action, (2) inform you of the terms of the Settlement, and (3) inform you of your rights and options in connection with the Settlement. You are encouraged to carefully read this Notice and understand your rights. PAGE 1 of 8

Exact Staff will not retaliate against, or view in disfavor, any employee who participates in this Settlement. Exact Staff has agreed to pay the full amount of the Settlement even if some employees opt out of participating in the settlement. Accordingly, Exact Staff will not pay less if you opt out. II. SUMMARY OF THE ACTION In the Action, Plaintiff Ricardo Sanchez ( Plaintiff ) contends that: (1) non-exempt employees of Exact Staff were not provided meal periods, (2) non-exempt employees of Exact Staff were not provided rest periods, (3) non-exempt employees of Exact Staff were not paid all earned wages under California law, including overtime, (4) non-exempt employees of Exact Staff were not paid all wages due upon discharge or quitting, (5) non-exempt employees of Exact Staff were not paid overtime under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act, (6) accurate and itemized wage statements were not provided by Exact Staff, and (7) there were unfair business practices based on the foregoing. In the Action, Plaintiff also contends that Exact Staff is liable for penalties under the California Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act ( PAGA ). Plaintiff sought to maintain a class action for claims on behalf of himself and all persons who are, or have been, employed by Exact Staff as a non-exempt employee in the State of California beginning February 10, 2013 through July 31, 2018, and were assigned to work at a Target Distribution center. Exact Staff denies any liability or wrongdoing of any kind in connection with Plaintiff s claims, and contends that, during all relevant times, it provided employees with meal and rest breaks as required by California law, has paid its employees all wages and overtime wages earned, provided accurate wage statements, and complied in all other respects with California and federal law. The Court has not ruled on the merits of Plaintiff s claims, and has not expressed any opinion regarding whether Plaintiff s claims are correct. The Parties to this Action have voluntarily agreed upon a tentative settlement of the claims asserted by Plaintiff. By agreeing to this Settlement, Exact Staff has not admitted to any wrongdoing and continues to dispute that any of Plaintiff s allegations have any merit or factual support. The Parties have agreed to this Settlement solely to avoid the legal expense of litigation. The Parties have stipulated to class certification solely for the purpose of effectuating this Settlement and, should the Settlement not be approved by the Court or effectuated, the stipulation for class certification for settlement purposes shall have no effect and be null and void. The Court granted preliminary approval of the Settlement on July 31, 2018. At that time, the Court also preliminarily approved Plaintiff to serve as Class Representative, and William Turley, David Mara and Jamie Serb of The Turley and Mara Law Firm, APLC to serve as Class Counsel. The Court scheduled a Final Fairness Hearing on the Settlement at 8:30 a.m. on November 13, 2018 in Department S26, San Bernardino County Superior Court, at which time the Court will decide whether to grant final approval of the Settlement. PAGE 2 of 8

III. SUMMARY OF SETTLEMENT TERMS Settlement Amount. Exact Staff has agreed to pay One Million Five Hundred Thousand U.S. Dollars ($1,500,000.00) (the Settlement Amount ) to fully resolve the claims in the Action. This Settlement Amount includes settlement administration costs, attorneys fees, litigation expenses, a Class Representative service enhancement, a payment to the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency, and applicable employer payroll and unemployment insurance taxes, as outlined below. The Court has tentatively approved certain payments to be made from the Settlement Amount as follows, which will be subject to final Court approval: Settlement administration. Payment to the Settlement Administrator, which is estimated to not exceed $52,000, for the expense of notifying the Settlement Class Members of the Settlement and processing payments and opt-outs submitted by Settlement Class Members. Attorneys Fees and Expenses. Payment to Plaintiff s Counsel of reasonable attorneys fees not to exceed $495,000 and litigation costs not to exceed $35,000 as compensation for the work Plaintiff s Counsel performed in this Action, and will continue to perform through settlement finalization. Plaintiff s Counsel have been prosecuting the Action on behalf of Plaintiff and the Class on a contingency fee basis (that is, without being paid any money to date) and have been paying all litigation costs and expenses. Class Representative Service Payment. A Service Payment not to exceed $7,500 to Plaintiff Ricardo Sanchez to compensate him for his services on behalf of the Settlement Class Members in initiating and prosecuting the Action. This payment is in addition to whatever payments Plaintiff otherwise is entitled to as a Settlement Class Member. Payment to the LWDA. A payment to the California Labor & Workforce Development Agency in the amount of $75,000 to settle claims under the California Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act. What remains after the above deductions from the Settlement Amount is referred to as the Net Settlement Amount, which will be apportioned amongst the Settlement Class Members on a pro rata basis based upon the number of workweeks each Settlement Class Member worked at Target Distribution centers during the Class Period. Calculation of Settlement Class Member Awards. The Net Settlement Value shall be apportioned among Settlement Class Members based on the Settlement Class Member s number of full-time equivalent workweeks in proportion to the total number of full-time equivalent workweeks by all Settlement Class Members. Each shift worked by a Settlement Class Member is equal to on-fifth of a workweek. Defendant will provide the Settlement Administrator the number of workweeks for each Settlement Class Member. Each Participating Settlement Class Member will receive a proportionate share of the Net settlement Value that is equal to (i) the number of workweeks he or she worked for Defendant in California based on the class data provided by Defendant, divided by (ii) the total number of workweeks worked by all Participating Settlement Class Members based on the same class data, which is then multiplied PAGE 3 of 8

by the Net Settlement Value. Therefore, the value of each Settlement Class Member s Individual Settlement Payment ties directly to the amount of workweeks that he or she worked. Automatic Payments to Settlement Class Members. You are not required to submit a claim form in order receive money pursuant to this Settlement. Presuming the Court grants final approval of the Settlement, you will thereafter receive your share of the settlement in the mail, unless you choose to not participate in the settlement and timely opt out. Exact Staff s records reflect that you have workweeks as an hourly employee assigned to work at Target Distribution Centers in California during the period February 10, 2013 through July 31, 2018. Based on these workweeks, it is estimated that Your Share of the Settlement will be the gross amount of $. The sum of the checks that you receive will be less than the Estimated Payment because there will be withholding for payroll and employment taxes. Uncashed settlement checks will be paid to the California Unclaimed Wages Fund. If you disagree with the information in the preceding paragraph regarding your Weeks and employment status, you may produce evidence to the Settlement Administrator supporting your disagreement. Exact Staff s records will be presumed determinative absent evidence which rebuts those records, but the Settlement Administrator shall evaluate the evidence submitted and make the final decisions as to which data should be applied. Any evidence supporting any disagreement with the information regarding your Weeks and employment status must be submitted by you to the Settlement Administrator no later than 30 calendar days after this Notice was mailed to you by the Settlement Administrator. Tax Matters. Twenty percent of the Settlement payment to each Settlement Class Member is for settlement of claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act ( FLSA Payment ), and 80 percent of the Settlement payment to each Settlement Class Member is for settlement of California statelaw claims ( California Payment ). Twenty percent of the FLSA Payment is apportioned to claims for unpaid wages, and the other 80 percent is apportioned to claims for interest and liquidated damages. Twenty percent of the California Payment is apportioned to claims for unpaid wages, and the other 80 percent is apportioned to claims for interest and penalties. Settlement Class Members should consult with their tax advisors concerning the tax consequences, if any, of the payments they receive under the Settlement. Conditions of Settlement. This Settlement is conditioned upon the Court entering an order finally approving the Settlement. IV. RECEIVING MONEY FROM THE SETTLEMENT As explained above, Settlement Class Members do not need to do anything to claim money from the Settlement. Rather, they will receive their money unless they affirmatively opt-out of the Settlement. Settlement Class Members who do not opt-out will receive two checks. One check will be for the portion of the Settlement relating to claims under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act ( FLSA Check ), and the other check will be for the portion relating to California state law claims ( California Check ). By negotiating the FLSA Check, a Settlement Class Member PAGE 4 of 8

agrees that he or she is opting in, and consenting to, the FLSA Release set forth in Section VII of this Notice. If you do not negotiate the California Check, you still will be bound by the terms of the California Release set forth in Section VII of this Notice. The only way not to be bound by the Settlement of the California state law claims is to opt out. V. RIGHT TO OPT OUT If you do not wish to participate in the Settlement, you may exclude yourself from the Settlement by opting out. If you opt out, you will receive no money from the Settlement, and you will not be bound by its terms. If you opt out of the Settlement, you will no longer be a Settlement Class Member, you will be barred from participating in this Settlement, and you will receive no benefit from this Settlement. By opting out of the Settlement, you will retain whatever rights or claims you may have, if any, against Exact Staff, and you will be free to attempt to pursue them on an individual basis at your own cost, if you choose to do so. Employees who opt out will have their portion of the settlement re-distributed to the Net Settlement Amount, which will go to the Settlement Class Members who do not opt out. If you wish to opt-out of participating in this Settlement, you must send a written request to the Settlement Administrator which must: (a) contain your name, address, telephone number, and last four digits your Social Security Number; (b) state that I understand that I am requesting to be excluded from the class monetary settlement and that I will receive no money from the Class Settlement Amount. I understand that if I am excluded from the Settlement Class, I may bring a separate action, but I might lose my separate action or win and recover nothing or less than what I would have recovered under the class monetary provisions in this case ; (c) be addressed to the Settlement Administrator at the address indicated below; and (d) be signed by you. The opt out request must be postmarked no later than September 29, 2018. The name and address of the Settlement Administrator is: Sanchez v Exact Staff, c/o Atticus Administration, PO Box 1440, Minneapolis, MN 55440. VI. RIGHT TO OBJECT If you are a Settlement Class Member who has not opted out and believe that the Settlement should not be finally approved by the Court for any reason, you may object to the proposed Settlement. Objections to the terms of the Settlement must be in writing, state the basis for any objection, and must be sent to the Settlement Administrator on or before September 29, 2018. Objections that pertain solely to the attorney s fees sought by Class Counsel must be filed with the Court, with a copy sent to the Administrator, no later than November 1, 2018. Objections not previously sent in writing in a timely manner as described above will not be considered by the Court. Any attorney who intends to represent an individual objecting to the Settlement must file a notice of appearance with the Court and serve counsel for all parties on or before November 13, 2018 at the following addresses: PAGE 5 of 8

Plaintiff s Counsel: William Turley, Esq. David Mara, Esq. Jamie Serb, Esq. The Turley and Mara Law Firm, APLC 7428 Trade Street San Diego, California 92121 (619) 234-2833 wturley@turleylawfirm.com dmara@turleylawfirm.com jserb@turleylawfirm.com Counsel for Exact Staff: David D. Jacobson, Esq. Reiko Furuta, Esq. Seyfarth Shaw LLP 2029 Century Park East, Suite 3500 Los Angeles, California 90067-3021 (310) 277-7200 djacobson@seyfarth.com rfuruta@seyfarth.com All objections or other correspondence must state the name and number of the case, which is Sanchez v. Exact Staff, Inc., San Bernardino County Superior Court, Case No. CIVDS1702554. If you object to the Settlement, you will remain a Settlement Class Member, and if the Court approves the Settlement, you will be bound by the terms of the Settlement in the same way as Settlement Class Members who do not object. Any Settlement Class Member who does not object in the manner provided above shall have waived any objection to the Settlement, whether by appeal or otherwise. VII. RELEASES FLSA Release: Settlement Class Members who sign, cash, or otherwise negotiate the FLSA Check, will be bound by the following release: By operation of the entry of the Final Approval Order and judgment, and except as to such rights or claims as may be created by this Agreement, each Settlement Class Member, and each of their respective executors, administrators, representatives, agents, heirs, successors, assigns, trustees, spouses, or guardians, will release Exact Staff, Inc., Target Corporation, and the Released Parties of and from any and all claims, rights, demands, charges, complaints, causes of action, obligations, or liability of any and every kind, known or unknown, that were or could have been asserted in any version of the complaints filed in this Action or are based on or arise out of the facts alleged in any version of the complaints filed in this Action, including those for failure to pay all wages, including overtime wages, under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. Sections 206, 207, and 216 arising at any time between February 10, 2013 and July 31, 2018. California Release: Settlement Class Members who do not opt out, will be bound by the following release: By operation of the entry of the Final Approval Order and judgment, and except as to such rights or claims as may be created by this Agreement, each Settlement PAGE 6 of 8

Class Member, and each of their respective executors, administrators, representatives, agents, heirs, successors, assigns, trustees, spouses, or guardians, will release Exact Staff, Inc. and Target Corporation, and all of their present and former members, subsidiaries, affiliates, and joint ventures, and all of their shareholders, officers, directors, employees, agents, servants, registered representatives, attorneys, insurers, successors and assigns, and any other persons acting by through, under or in concert with any of them ( Released Parties ) from any and all claims, debts, liabilities, demands, obligations, penalties, guarantees, costs, expenses, attorney s fees, damages, action or causes of action of whatever kind or nature, whether known or unknown, contingent or accrued, that were alleged or that reasonably could have been alleged based on the facts alleged in the Lawsuit, as amended, and that arose during the Settlement Period, including, but not limited to, any claims of any Settlement Class Member for failure to provide proper or accurate wage statements, failure to provide meal breaks, failure to provide rest breaks, failure to pay overtime, failure to pay wages, including overtime based upon alleged failure to comply with California Alternative Work Schedule requirements, failure to pay all wages due at time of termination, failure to pay wages at the agreed upon rate, failure to pay minimum wage, claims for unfair competition based upon any of the foregoing, and claims for penalties for any of the foregoing based upon the California Labor Code Private Attorney General Act (Labor Code sections 2698 et seq ( PAGA )). This Agreement is conditioned upon the release by all Settlement Class Members of any claim under Labor Code section 2699 as to the released claims set forth above, and upon covenants by all members that they will not participate in any proceeding seeking penalties as to the released claims set forth above. The Parties intent in entering into this Settlement is to release Defendant and the Released Parties from any and all claims that arise from the claims alleged in the Action, and preclude Defendant from owing any further monies (beyond the payments set forth in this Settlement) to Settlement Class Members based upon the claims made, or that could have been made, based upon the allegations contained in the Action. This release excludes the release of any claims not permitted to be released by law. VIII. HEARING ON THE SETTLEMENT The Court will hold a Final Approval Hearing on the adequacy, reasonableness and fairness of the Settlement. The Final Approval Hearing is scheduled for 8:30 a.m. on November 13, 2018 in Department S26, San Bernardino County Superior Court, 247 West 3rd Street, San Bernardino, CA 92415. The Hearing may be continued without further notice. You are not required to attend the Final Approval Hearing, although any Settlement Class Member is welcome to attend the hearing. PAGE 7 of 8

IX. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION This Notice is only a summary of the Action and the Settlement. Settlement Class Members should contact the Settlement Administrator with any concerns or questions regarding the Settlement. You may also refer to the pleadings, the Joint Stipulation of Settlement and Release of Claims, and other papers filed in the Action, which will be posted on the following website maintained by the Settlement Administrator: www.exactstaffsettlement.com. These papers may be inspected at the Office of the Clerk for the San Bernardino County Superior Court, 247 West 3rd Street, San Bernardino, CA during regular business hours of each court day. PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT THE CLERK OF THE COURT OR THE JUDGE WITH QUESTIONS. PAGE 8 of 8