International Trade Lecture 1: Trade Facts and the Gravity Equation

Similar documents
International Trade Lecture 1: Trade Facts and the Gravity Equation

Topics in Trade: Slides

International Trade The Gravity Equation and its Applications

International Trade: Lecture 4

Economics 689 Texas A&M University

Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle

Gravity, Trade Integration and Heterogeneity across Industries

C) a decrease in the wage and an increase in the return to capital in the receiving country.

Topics in Trade: Slides

ECON 442: Quantitative Trade Models. Jack Rossbach

Topics in Trade: Slides

Lecture 5: Empirics of the Heckscher-Ohlin Model

Monopolistic competition models

Heckscher-Ohlin Theory

The World Economy from a Distance

Working paper. Comment: Inferring Trade Costs from Trade Booms and Trade Busts

The Heckscher-Ohlin model: Empirics I (factor content studies)

Prepared by Iordanis Petsas To Accompany. by Paul R. Krugman and Maurice Obstfeld

Université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne Cours de Commerce International L3 Exercise booklet

Lecture 3: New Trade Theory

University of Karachi

International Trade and Income Differences

Public Affairs 856 Trade, Competition, and Governance in a Global Economy Lecture 6-7 2/12-2/14/2018

Contents. List of Figures / xi. Acknowledgements / xxi. 1. International Trade: Theory and Application / 1

K e y T e r m Ricardian Model

Chapter 5. Resources and Trade: The Heckscher- Ohlin Model

Stanford Economics 266: International Trade Lecture 8: Factor Proportions Theory (I)

Lesson 12: Hecksher-Ohlin Model

Factor endowments and trade I

Lecture 2: The neo-classical model of international trade

MIT PhD International Trade Lecture 5: The Ricardo-Viner and Heckscher-Ohlin Models (Theory I)

Regional trade in Latin American Southern Cone ( ): the negative effect of high trade costs among neighbouring countries

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT

Study Questions (with Answers) Lecture 4 Modern Theories and Additional Effects of Trade

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. Theory Appendix for The China Syndrome. Small Open Economy Model

Double Taxation Treaties Impact on Intermediate Trade

Recitation 4. Canonical Models of Trade and Technology. Spring Peter Hull

International Economics Econ 4401 Midterm Exam Key

International Trade Glossary of terms

Midterm Exam International Trade Economics 6903, Fall 2008 Donald Davis

Trade- Practice and Theory

Econ 871: LECTURE NOTES. Lukasz Drozd

EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND MONETARY UNION (EMU)2 is an unprecedented and

ECON* International Trade Winter 2011 Instructor: Patrick Martin

Internationalization of Production: FDI and. FDI-Outsourcing

Asymmetric Trade Estimator in Modified Gravity: Corporate Tax Rates and Trade in OECD Countries

Preview. Chapter 5. Resources and Trade: The Heckscher-Ohlin Model

FINAL VERSION A Friday, March 24, 2006 Multiple choice - each worth 5 points

A Knowledge-and-Physical-Capital Model of International Trade, Foreign Direct Investment, and Multinational Enterprises: Developed Countries

PhD Topics in Macroeconomics

From Leontief to Leamer and Beyond

International Economics Econ 4401 Midterm Exam

INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS: TRADE THEORY

INTERNATIONAL TRADE: THEORY AND POLICY (HO)

The Composition of Exports and Gravity

Trade Theory with Numbers: Quantifying the Welfare Consequences of Globalization

Endowment differences: The Heckscher-Ohlin model

The Final Exam is Tuesday May 4 th at 1:00 in the normal Todd classroom

Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle

University Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne International Trade L3 Application Exercises

RIETI BBL Seminar Handout

Gravity Redux: Structural Estimation of Gravity Equations with Asymmetric Bilateral Trade Costs

Factor Tariffs and Income

International Trade Gravity Model

Chapter 3: Predicting the Effects of NAFTA: Now We Can Do It Better!

Trade Intensity and Business Cycle Synchronization: Are Developing Countries any Different? *

Trade theory and intra industry trade;

International Economics: Lecture 10 & 11

The Heckscher-Ohlin model

International Economics. Testing Trade Theories & HOV Model

The Gravity Equation in International Trade

Lecture 3. Introduction to International Trade and Factor Mobility

Essays in International Trade

ESCAP-World Bank Trade Cost Database - Implication for Asia-Pacific Connectivity

Lecture 14. Multinational Firms. 2. Dunning's OLI, joint inputs, firm versus plant-level scale economies

Chapter 4. Comparative Advantage and Factor Endowments. Copyright 2011 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

TARIFF REDUCTIONS, TERMS OF TRADE AND PRODUCT VARIETY

Lecture 13. Trade in Factors. 2. The Jones-Coelho-Easton two-factor, one-good model.

DETERMINANTS OF TRADE IN VALUE-ADDED:

HOV with technology and consumption dissimilarity

The Causative Factors of Bangladesh s Exports: Evidence from the Gravity Model Analysis.

Ricardian Model part 1

Location, Productivity, and Trade

BSM International Business

UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS

Technology and trade I

Potential Impacts of the TPP on Agricultural Trade in the Asia-Pacific Region Utilizing a Gravity Model Framework

Contents. 1 Introduction. The Globalization of the World Economy 1 1.1A We Live in a Global Economy 1

Neue Erkenntnisse der Außenwirtschaftstheorie von Ricardo bis Melitz

PubPol/Econ 541. Behind the Standard Model. Essential Features of Ricardian and Heckscher-Ohlin Models

International Trade: Lecture 3

Appendix C An Added Note to Chapter 4 on the Intercepts in the Pooled Estimates

International Trade, Monopolistic Competition and Gravity

International Economics B 9. Monopolistic competition and international trade: Firm Heterogeneity

ECON-140 Midterm 2 Spring, 2011

Economics 181: International Trade Midterm Solutions

The Changing Incidence of Geography

Bilateral Trade in Textiles and Apparel in the U.S. under the Caribbean Basin Initiative: Gravity Model Approach

International Development and Firm Distribution

Transfer Pricing by Multinational Firms: New Evidence from Foreign Firm Ownership

Transcription:

International Trade Lecture 1: Trade Facts and the Equation Stefania Garetto September 3rd, 2009 1 / 20

Trade Facts After WWII, unprecedented growth of trade volumes, both in absolute terms and as % of GDP. Figure 1: Volumes of World Trade 2 / 20

Trade Facts Volumes of trade in the U.S. increased then-fold. In recent years, negative trade balance. Figure 2: Volumes of U.S. Trade. 3 / 20

Trade Facts Facts Theory Figure 3: Trade as a % of GDP, selected countries. 4 / 20

Trade Facts Facts Theory Figure 4: US Import by country of origin. 5 / 20

Trade Facts Facts Theory More than 50% of total trade flows happen between developed countries; about 15% between developing counties; about 30% between developed and developing countries. Rising importance of China: Chinese exports increased 30-fold from 1978 to 2008 (from 2 to 40% of GDP). More than 40% of U.S. trade flows happen between firms boundaries.... and so on. 6 / 20

Trade Theory Facts Theory Trade theory tries to answer the following questions: What explains the pattern of trade across countries? What goods do countries trade? Which kind of firms trade? What is the role of FDI and multinational production? How do they affect trade patterns? What can explain the growth in trade? Does trade affect GDP growth? What are the effects of trade on the labor markets? 7 / 20

Helpman JEP 1999: what happened in the field 1960-1990 Facts Theory Well, even before that... 1817: Ricardo s Principles of Political Economy and Taxation THEORY OF COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE: a country exports products in which its labor productivity is high relative to its labor productivity in other products. 1920s: Heckscher-Ohlin FACTOR ENDOWMENTS DETERMINE THE PATTERN OF TRADE: a country should export the product that is relatively intensive in using the factor with which the country is relatively well-endowed. 8 / 20

Testing the Heckscher-Ohlin prediction Facts Theory 1954: LEONTIEF PARADOX Leontief found that the K/L ratio embodied in US imports exceeded the one in US exports (opposite to HO if we believe the US are more capital intensive than their trading partners). 9 / 20

Testing the Heckscher-Ohlin prediction Facts Theory 1954: LEONTIEF PARADOX Leontief found that the K/L ratio embodied in US imports exceeded the one in US exports (opposite to HO if we believe the US are more capital intensive than their trading partners). 1960s-1980s: other attempts to thest the theory obtained mixed results BUT: based on pure accounting relationships and unrealistic assumptions (FPE, common technologies and production structures across countries). 9 / 20

Testing the Heckscher-Ohlin prediction Facts Theory 1954: LEONTIEF PARADOX Leontief found that the K/L ratio embodied in US imports exceeded the one in US exports (opposite to HO if we believe the US are more capital intensive than their trading partners). 1960s-1980s: other attempts to thest the theory obtained mixed results BUT: based on pure accounting relationships and unrealistic assumptions (FPE, common technologies and production structures across countries). Trefler (1995): attempt of taking into account productivity differences. BUT: one can always reconcile the theory with the data adding arbitrary differences in technologies/production structure across countries and sectors, but this is not progress. 9 / 20

Testing the Heckscher-Ohlin prediction Facts Theory 1954: LEONTIEF PARADOX Leontief found that the K/L ratio embodied in US imports exceeded the one in US exports (opposite to HO if we believe the US are more capital intensive than their trading partners). 1960s-1980s: other attempts to thest the theory obtained mixed results BUT: based on pure accounting relationships and unrealistic assumptions (FPE, common technologies and production structures across countries). Trefler (1995): attempt of taking into account productivity differences. BUT: one can always reconcile the theory with the data adding arbitrary differences in technologies/production structure across countries and sectors, but this is not progress. Need to MODEL CROSS-COUNTRY DIFFERENECS IN TECHNOLOGY AND PRODUCTION STRUCTURE! 9 / 20

The New Trade Theory Facts Theory Krugman (1979): new, complementary theory based on ECONOMIES OF SCALE and PRODUCT DIFFERENTIATION. Motivated by: 1. Large volumes of trade between countries with similar factor proportions. 2. Large volumes of intra-industry trade. (None of this seems motivated by factor endowment differences). 10 / 20

The New Trade Theory Facts Theory Krugman (1979): new, complementary theory based on ECONOMIES OF SCALE and PRODUCT DIFFERENTIATION. Motivated by: 1. Large volumes of trade between countries with similar factor proportions. 2. Large volumes of intra-industry trade. (None of this seems motivated by factor endowment differences). Economies of scale favor countries specialization in different products and could explain different countries development and use of different technologies and production structures. Consumers taste for variety then leads to intra-industry trade. 10 / 20

The Equation Consider a world where: - every country is specialized in a distinct set of products; - each country s population has the same homothetic preferences; - trade is balanced. 11 / 20

The Equation Consider a world where: - every country is specialized in a distinct set of products; - each country s population has the same homothetic preferences; - trade is balanced. - spending levels in each goods are proportional to GDP levels import and export are also proportional to GDP levels. 11 / 20

The Equation Consider a world where: - every country is specialized in a distinct set of products; - each country s population has the same homothetic preferences; - trade is balanced. - spending levels in each goods are proportional to GDP levels import and export are also proportional to GDP levels. GRAVITY: VOLUMES OF TRADE are positively related to the GDP LEVELS of the trading countries and negatively related to the DISTANCE between the trading countries. [Notice: gravity needs a minimal set of assumptions to hold. It could be generated by a Ricardian model theory, by HO, or by the new trade theory models.] 11 / 20

The Equation: Free Trade - y i k : country i s output of good k; - Y i := - Y := N k=1 C i=1 y i k : country i s GDP; Y i : world GDP; - s i := Y i /Y : country i s share of world expenditure (GDP). Exports from i to j of good k: X ij k = sj y i k. Total exports from i to j: X ij = N k=1 X ij k = sj N yk i = s j Y i = Y j Y i k=1 Y = s j s i Y (= X ji ). Bilateral trade between i and j: X ij + X ji = 2Y j Y i Y = 2s j s i Y. (1) 12 / 20

The Equation: Trade Between Countries of Different Size Let A denote a region composed by several countries, indexed by i A. Let s A = Y A /Y, s ia = Y i /Y A. Helpman (1987): Volume of trade in A GDP in A ( = s A 1 ) (s ia ) 2 i A }{{} size dispersion index. Volumes of trade are higher between countries of similar size. Tests of this prediction resulted in mixed evidence (support for OECD countries, not for others, see Debaere (2002)). BUT: the result is based on the assumption of complete specialization, which might not hold after all. 13 / 20

The Border Effect Mc Callum (1995): compare within-canada and US-Canada trade. lnx ij = α + β 1 ln(y i ) + β 2 ln(y j ) + ρln(d ij ) + γδ ij + ε ij where d ij = distance and δ ij = 1 if within-canada trade, zero otherwise. Results: ˆβ 1, ˆβ 2 1 ˆρ < 0 negative effect of distance ˆγ 3 BORDER EFFECT: intranational trade is about 22 times larger than international trade!!! Need of introducing TRADE BARRIERS into the analysis! BUT: This implies that prices may differ across countries: need for more microfoundation, including prices in the equation. 14 / 20

A Simple Model - X ij k : exports from i to j of good k ; - c ij k : consumption in j of good k (produced in i), X ij k = pij k cij k ; - N i : number of products produced in country i; - p i : F.O.B. price of goods produced in country i; - p ij = T ij p i : C.I.F. price of goods prod. in i and sold in j, T ij 1, T ii = 1. Assume p ij k = pij, k c ij Consumers problem: k = cij, k. [ C max U j = c ij s.t. i=1 N i (c ij ) σ 1 σ ] σ σ 1 C N i p ij c ij = Y j i=1 (where σ > 1). The solution takes the form: X ij = N i ( p ij P j ) 1 σ Y j = Y i Y j (p i ) σ ȳ ( T ij P j ) 1 σ (2) where P j = [ C i=1 Ni (p ij ) 1 σ ] 1 1 σ. 15 / 20

Estimating Price Indexes Equation: X ij = Y i Y j (p i ) σ ȳ ( T ij P j ) 1 σ Estimating equation: lnx ij = ln(y i Y j )+(1 σ) lnt ij σ lnp i +(σ 1) ln(p j )+ε ij 16 / 20

Estimating Price Indexes Equation: X ij = Y i Y j (p i ) σ ȳ ( T ij P j ) 1 σ Estimating equation: lnx ij = ln(y i Y j )+(1 σ) lnt ij σ lnp i +(σ 1) ln(p j )+ε ij BUT: Ideal price indexes are not observable! 3 approaches: 1. directly measure them as GDP deflators; 2. estimate them using the model market clearing conditions: Anderson and van Wincoop (2003); 3. proxy for them using country fixed effects. 16 / 20

Anderson and van Wincoop (2003) Market clearing: p i y i = C T ij p i c ij. j=1 Theorem 1 Assume trade costs are symmetric: T ij = T ji. Then an implicit solution to the market clearing condition is: p i = 1 P i ( s i N i ) 1 1 σ (3) which implies: (P j ) 1 σ = C j=1 s i ( T ij P i ) 1 σ. (4) Why this is progress? Substituting (3) into the gravity equation, we obtain: X ij = Y i Y j Y ( T ij P i P j ) 1 σ. 17 / 20

Anderson and van Wincoop (2003) (contd.) Assume the following form for T ij : The gravity equation X ij = Y i Y j Y estimation equation: T ij = τ ij + ρln(d ij ) + ε ij. (5) ( T ij P i P j ) 1 σ leads to the following ln(x ij /(Y i Y j )) = ρ(1 σ)ln(d ij ) + (1 σ)τ ij +... Estimation strategy: 1. Use (5) to obtain predicted values for T ij. +ln(p i ) σ 1 + ln(p j ) σ 1 + (1 σ)ε ij. 2. Use (4) to compute the multilateral resistance terms (P i ) σ 1, (P j ) σ 1 ). 3. Run the estimation equation. 18 / 20

Anderson and van Wincoop (2003) (contd.) Results: 1. Size (+) and trade barriers (-) matter in determining volumes of trade. 19 / 20

Anderson and van Wincoop (2003) (contd.) Results: 1. Size (+) and trade barriers (-) matter in determining volumes of trade. 2. The multilateral resistance terms P j describe how remote a county is from the rest of the world: for given trade barriers, the more isolated a country is, the higher the price index, the lower is the volume of trade. 19 / 20

Anderson and van Wincoop (2003) (contd.) Results: 1. Size (+) and trade barriers (-) matter in determining volumes of trade. 2. The multilateral resistance terms P j describe how remote a county is from the rest of the world: for given trade barriers, the more isolated a country is, the higher the price index, the lower is the volume of trade. 3. Estimates of τ ij (the border effect on prices) depend on the value of σ and range between 10-50% ; 19 / 20

Anderson and van Wincoop (2003) (contd.) Results: 1. Size (+) and trade barriers (-) matter in determining volumes of trade. 2. The multilateral resistance terms P j describe how remote a county is from the rest of the world: for given trade barriers, the more isolated a country is, the higher the price index, the lower is the volume of trade. 3. Estimates of τ ij (the border effect on prices) depend on the value of σ and range between 10-50% ; 4. Downsizing of McCallum estimates of the border effect for Canada: intranational trade is about 10 times higher than international trade for Canada Mc Callum larger number is due to the omitted variables P i. 19 / 20

Anderson and van Wincoop (2003) (contd.) Results: 1. Size (+) and trade barriers (-) matter in determining volumes of trade. 2. The multilateral resistance terms P j describe how remote a county is from the rest of the world: for given trade barriers, the more isolated a country is, the higher the price index, the lower is the volume of trade. 3. Estimates of τ ij (the border effect on prices) depend on the value of σ and range between 10-50% ; 4. Downsizing of McCallum estimates of the border effect for Canada: intranational trade is about 10 times higher than international trade for Canada Mc Callum larger number is due to the omitted variables P i. 5. Asymmetry of the border effect: intranational trade is about 2.5 times higher than international trade for the US, suggesting a larger border effect for smaller countries. 19 / 20

Anderson and van Wincoop (2004) : Trade Costs Exhaustive survey of the literature on measurement of trade costs. Look at different types of trade costs: 1. Transportation costs 2. Policy barriers (tariff and non-tariff barriers) 3. Wholesale and distribution costs and at sources of data on trade costs: direct measures indirect measures from evidence on quantities from evidence on prices. Use gravity theory to infer trade costs from trade volumes and other observable variables. 20 / 20