System Operating Policies on Compensation between Elia and Nemo Link

Similar documents
CHAPTER 1. General Provisions


CID Methodology Explanatory note

7 April ENTSO-E AISBL Avenue de Cortenbergh Brussels Belgium Tel Fax www. entsoe.

Proposal for Multiple NEMO Arrangements (MNA) for the Belgian bidding zone in accordance with Article 45 and Article 57 of the Commission Regulation

Energinet.dk s proposal for Arrangements concerning more than one NEMO in one bidding zone in accordance with Article 45 and 57 of the Commission

GB TSOs Intraday proposal for arrangements concerning more than one Nominated Electricity Market Operator (NEMO) in the GB Bidding Zone in accordance

REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT BY ALL REGULATORY AUTHORITIES AGREED AT THE ENERGY REGULATORS FORUM ON

APPROVAL BY ALL CONCERNED CCR HANSA AUTHORITIES

(7) This proposal is submitted for the approval of all National Regulatory Authorities (hereafter referred to as the NRAs ) of the CCR GRIT.

All NEMOs proposal for the price coupling algorithm and for the continuous trading matching algorithm, also incorporating TSO and NEMO proposals for

Harmonised Allocation Rules for Forward Capacity Allocation Summary of the assessment of the comments from the public consultation

Intraday Implicit Cross- Border allocation on BE-FR border. Description of the allocation mechanism

Intraday Implicit CrossBorder allocation on BE-NL. and borders (Interim Implicit Cross Border Intraday BE-NL. Description of the allocation mechanism

18 April 2016 Draft for consultation

BritNed border specific annex to the Allocation Rules. GB NL border

CHARGING METHODOLOGY STATEMENT FOR THE ELECLINK INTERCONNECTOR

Proposal of the Transmission System Operators of the Baltic. Capacity Calculation Region for the regional design of longterm

Mr Alberto Pototschnig, Director ACER. CC: Dr Klaus-Dieter Borchardt, Director Internal Energy Market DG ENER European Commission

Capacity Calculation Region Nordics regional design of long-term transmission rights in accordance with Article 31 of the Commission Regulation (EU)

IU TSOs proposal for fallback procedures in accordance with Article 44 of the Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1222 of 24 July 2015 establishing a

ACER. Congestion income distribution methodology. in accordance with Article 73 of the Commission Regulation

Minutes of Workgroup European Market Design 29/09/2015

Content Abbreviations Article 1 Article 2 Article 3 Article 4 Article 5 Article 6 Article 7 Article 8 Article 9 Article 10 Article 11 Article 12

TSOs perspective of the CACM requirements. Athanasios Troupakis Market Advisor ENTSO-E

Supporting document for the Danish TSO, Energinet, of the Nordic Capacity Calculation Region proposal for splitting long-term cross-zonal capacity

Network Code on Forward Capacity Allocation

Content Abbreviations Article 1 Article 2 Article 3 Article 4 Article 5 Article 6 Article 7 Article 8 Article 9 Article 10 Article 11 Article 12

Explanatory document for the Nordic synchronous area proposal for limits for the exchange of FCR between the TSOs in accordance with Article 163(2)

BritNed Participants Forum. 12 October 2017 London

Response to ENTSOE public consultation. Network Code on Capacity Allocation and Congestion Management for. Electricity

Specific Annex for the Bidding Zone borders serviced by SEE CAO to the Harmonised Allocation Rules for long-term transmission rights

Intraday Cross-Zonal Gate Opening and Gate Closure Times. Consultation document. PC_2018_E_01 9 January 2018

XBID Information Package Published February 2018 Updated December 2018

Business Process. BP_SO_13.1 Interim Long-Term Coordinated Capacity Calculation

Allegato A. Summary WHEREAS... 3 GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 1 Subject matter and scope Article 2 Definitions... 4

Viviane Illegems European Market Integration

February February 2017 Page 1 of 12

We appreciate your feedback

Commission de Régulation de l Electricité et du Gaz. the CWE region. ELCom Forum Alain Marien Technical Operation of the Markets

Allocation Rules for Forward Capacity Allocation

Introduction. 1.1 The CACM Regulation & all TSOs. 1.2 Geographical application of this proposal

According to article 9 (8) (d) of Regulation 2015/1222 the proposal is subject to approval by each national regulatory authority.

FTR Trading Information Pack February 2018

13 th February th February 2017 Page 1 of 7

Grid Code Issue Paper

Trading across borders - The key to manage portfolios at a regional scale

Intraday Cross Border The Netherlands-Belgium

Power Trading in the Coupled European Markets

1.4. In accordance with paragraph 4 of Article 17, the decision is made on a case by case basis by the NRAs of the concerned Member States.

Cross-Border Intraday: Questions & Answers

Intraday Cross Border The Netherlands-Belgium

All Baltic CCR TSOs Common Proposal for Regional Design of Long-Term Transmission Rights in Accordance with Article 31 of the Commission Regulation

Capacity Allocation and Congestion Management (CACM) Code Overview

The Road to the I-SEM

Regulatory framework for crossborder redispatching and countertrading

Status quo: Network Codes and Guidelines from NRAs perspective. Dace Bite Public Utilities Commission of Latvia Deputy Director of Energy Department

ACER ON THE CONGESTION INCOME DISTRIBUTION METHODOLOGY. of 14 December 2017 THE AGENCY FOR THE COOPERATION OF ENERGY REGULATORS,

(a) maximises market participants opportunities for adjusting their balances by

1/12/2018. Allegato A

DAILY SHADOW ALLOCATION RULES

Table of Contents List of Figures...3 List of Tables...3 Definitions and Abbreviations...4 Introduction...7

The market setup in the Baltics explanation with examples

SHADOW ALLOCATION RULES

Info Session NWE Day-Ahead

ACER. Annex II Evaluation of responses to the consultation on the Congestion income distribution methodology with all regulatory authorities and T$Os

ACER ON ALL TRANSMISSION SYSTEM OPERATORS PROPOSAL FOR INTRADAY CROSS-ZONAL GATE OPENING AND INTRADAY CROSS-ZONAL GATE CLOSURE TIMES

Intraday cross-zonal gate opening and gate. in accordance with Article 59 of Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1222 of 24

7 April ENTSO-E AISBL Avenue de Cortenbergh Brussels Belgium Tel Fax www. entsoe.

The strategic reserve a mechanism to cover structural shortages

I-SEM Interconnector Losses. Information Paper

European Market Desing and focus on Flow-Based Market Coupling

Wholesale Electricity Market Monitoring Report for the Energy Community Contracting Parties and Georgia

Regional Flow-based allocations. State-of-play

I-SEM Business Liaison Group NEMO. 26 January 2018

NWE Info Session. Operational & contractual changes for Dutch wholesale market organization

ALL TRANSMISSION SYSTEM OPERATORS OF THE CAPACITY CALCUCULATION REGION CORE, TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE FOLLOWING: Whereas

EAI Response to ACER Consultation on Forward Risk-Hedging Products and Harmonisation of Long-Term Capacity Allocation Rules

Present: Philippe de LADOUCETTE, Chairman, Olivier CHALLAN BELVAL, Hélène GASSIN, Jean-Pierre SOTURA and Michel THIOLLIERE, Commissioners.

AGREEMENT ON TRANSMISSION SERVICE ON FINGRID'S CROSS-BORDER CONNECTIONS BETWEEN RUSSIA AND FINLAND, NO /2018

Continuous Trading Matching Algorithm Public Description

Baltic Harmonised Imbalance Settlement Model Document

Participation Agreement. between

Prague, 25/09/ M Market Coupling

ELIA LFC Block Operational Agreement

Quick Guide to the Integrated Single Electricity Market. Version 1

FORTUMS RESPONSE TO ACER CONSULTATION ON FORWARD RISK-HEDGING PRODUCTS AND HARMONISATION OF LONG-TERM CAPACITY ALLOCATION RULES

Methodology for the Calculation of Scheduled Exchanges resulting from single day-ahead coupling Explanatory Note

Methodology for assessment of the Nordic forward market

The implementation of the Electricity Target Model in Greece. Angeliki D. Mourtzikou Director of Markets Monitoring and Competition, RAE

APPROVAL BY ALL REGULATORY AUTHORITIES AGREED AT THE ENERGY REGULATORS FORUM

16 July 2018 DRAFT VERSION for public consultation

Chapter 2: Market Governance, Administration and Operation. Industry Guide to the I-SEM

We appreciate your feedback

Comments on CEPA s draft conclusions in relation to European transmission tariffs

SEMO PX MARKET DESIGN

FTR Trading Information Pack February 2018

Baltic Harmonised Imbalance Settlement Model Document

Possible market model for crossborder intraday trading

Current State of Intraday Markets in Europe May 2007

Transcription:

System Operating Policies on Compensation between Elia and Nemo Link 1

WHEREAS Elia and Nemo Link have entered into the Joint Operation Agreement ( JOA ) on the 25 th of February 2015 for the purpose of setting out the framework in which the Parties will jointly operate the Interconnector Circuits. The definitions of the JOA are also applicable for this System Operating Policy. As stated in the scope of the JOA the parties (Elia and Nemo Link) shall (amongst others); i. work together honestly and fairly to jointly operate the Interconnector Circuits as further described in, and in accordance with, the terms of the JOA and; ii. use their best endeavours to maximize the level of availability of the Interconnector Circuits and otherwise act in accordance with the best interests of the Interconnector Circuits. Clause 5.3.1 of the JOA states that The System Operating Policies relating to capacity calculation methods should be aimed at setting the NTC to the Connection Power under normal conditions and subject to applicable Laws and network codes and the conditions stated in clause 19 of the Interface Agreement. Clause 5.3.2 of the JOA provides the contractual basis and corresponding principles for a compensation related to reduction of capacity of the Interconnector between Nemo Link and Elia, which are further elaborated by means of this System Operating Policy on Compensation. Elia and Nemo Link have entered into an Interface Agreement ( IA ) on the 27 th of February 2015, which governs the Connection to the Elia Grid, and the Facilities of the Nemo Link that may influence the security, reliability and/or efficiency of the Elia Grid, describes the metering equipment, and determines the Connection Power and the property rights as well as the rights of use of Nemo Link and Elia. Article 19 of the IA states that [ ] The Parties shall coordinate their planning for the maintenance and works so as to limit the unavailability s of the grid elements and the risk of interruption of the supply of transmission services to the Nemo Link to a reasonable minimum [ ] Nemo Link will ensure that Elia is entitled and has the possibility to carry out works and/or maintenance, if necessary. In case the planned maintenance works induces a connection capacity restriction ex-ante for the Nemo Link, Elia will not compensate the Nemo Link for the loss of profit during this restriction period. 2

1 Purpose of this document This System Operating Policy includes, amongst others: - Applicable principles for the compensation - The mechanism used for calculating the compensation - Treatment of the financial aspects of the compensation Parties acknowledge that the compensation scheme hereunder will only apply in case it is approved by the Belgian regulator CREG and only as long as the standard hybrid coupling 1 mechanism is implemented. 2 Principles: In line with the provisions of the JOA related to compensation, the compensation mechanism agreed upon between Nemo Link and Elia for a reduction of commercial capacity shall be based on following principles: - Compensation is only due in case of a reduction of the Net Transfer Capacity below the Connection Power due to constraints in the Elia grid in accordance with the JOA and under the conditions described in this System Operating Policy. - Such reduction due to constraints in the Elia grid can only happen as a result of the application of a coordinated capacity calculation methodology on the BE-GB border or as result of a curtailment in accordance with the principles defined in Article 72 of CACM and/or Article 53 and 56 of FCA; - No compensation shall be due if the capacity reduction is the result of factors outside the Elia grid (such as, but not limited to, reduced availability of the Interconnector Circuits or constraints in the NGET grid); - Where compensation is due as a result of a reduction of capacity, Nemo Link will be kept whole (i.e. Nemo Link should not bear any financial loss nor gains) (i) for the compensation of market parties and/or shipping agents in case of curtailment of allocated capacity and (ii) for the loss of congestion income (opportunity cost) in case of reduction of the capacity that would have, in absence of reduction, been allocated through the day-ahead market coupling (see paragraphs 3.1 and 3.2); - Compensation can be due by Elia to Nemo Link or by Nemo Link to Elia; - In accordance with Article 19 of the Interface Agreement and clause 5.3.1 of the JOA, ex-ante capacity reductions resulting from planned maintenance or works in the Elia grid 2 shall not result in any compensation due between Elia and Nemo Link; - A reduction of capacity can only be compensated once (see paragraph 3.2); and A distinction is made between compensation for a reduction of allocated capacity and reduction of non-allocated capacity, which is further specified in the paragraphs 3.1 and 3.2 of this System Operating Policy. These principles shall be applicable on the Compensation Mechanisms described in paragraph 3 of this System Operating Policy. 1 CNTC mechanism not linked to Flow-Based as opposed to Advanced Hybrid Coupling. For avoidance of doubt SHC implies an NTC-based capacity calculation for the Nemo Link Interconnector and its integration in the market coupling for day-ahead capacity allocation. 2 In such case, only planned maintenance or works on Belgian grid elements, which lead to a redistribution of flow that will significantly impact Belgian Critical Network Element and may then trigger the need for day-ahead capacity calculation on the GB-BE border, can dispense Elia from a compensation of Nemo Link. At the time of validation of this System Operating Policy, such elements are listed in the annex 1 to the Channel DA and ID Capacity Calculation Methodology submitted for regulatory approval and dated May 23 rd, 2018. 3

3 Compensation Mechanism The compensation mechanism is twofold. As stated in the principles of paragraph 2 there is a distinction between: a) the compensation applicable for the reduction of the already allocated capacity in accordance with Article 53 and 56 of FCA and 72 of CACM; and b) the compensation for the reduction of the non-allocated capacity (opportunity costs evaluated in the dayahead timeframe) as a result of the application of a coordinated capacity calculation methodology on the BE-GB border. 3.1 Allocated capacity: Capacity can be allocated in different timeframes: - long term; - day-ahead; and - intraday Capacity can be allocated in an explicit or implicit manner: - Explicit allocation: the capacity is allocated in accordance with EU Harmonized Allocation Rules ( EU HAR ) (for long term capacity allocation) or via the Shadow Allocation Rules (as fallback allocation in the day-ahead timeframe). Explicit capacity is allocated to market parties. - Implicit allocation: the capacity is allocated in accordance with the market coupling mechanisms in dayahead and/or intraday. Implicit capacity is allocated to shipping agents. - In case of a reduction of allocated capacity, market parties and/or shipping agents must be compensated in accordance with the principles laid down in the applicable EU legislation (CACM and FCA GL) as further specified in Table 1. Compensation Mechanism for allocated capacity Taking into consideration the principles of paragraph 2, Nemo Link shall not be subject to financial damage or financial benefit resulting of a compensation to market parties or shipping agents under applicable European legislation as stated in table 1 in the event of allocated capacity reduction due to constraints in the Elia grid, subject to following conditions: - Compensation for a reduction of already allocated capacity shall only be due in case the volume of allocated capacity was in accordance with the coordinated capacity calculation process applicable on the BE-GB border and, where relevant, with the application of commonly agreed splitting rules. - For reduction of allocated capacity, Elia will pay Nemo Link (or vice versa) for the compensation that Nemo Link needs to pay to the market parties or shipping agents for such capacity reduction in accordance with the EU legislation. Compensation for a reduction of allocated capacity can be either due by Elia to Nemo Link or vice versa: 1. where compensation is due by Nemo Link to market parties or shipping agents (cf. Table 1), Elia will hold Nemo Link harmless for the effective costs incurred; 2. where Nemo Link should receive a compensation from the market parties or shipping agents in accordance with the CACM guideline, Nemo Link will reimburse said compensation to Elia. 4

The compensation with respect to the allocated capacity for a market time unit (MTU) will be based on: - The reduction of allocated capacity (expressed in MW) for the MTU; - The corresponding price for the compensation of the capacity, in accordance with the CACM and FCA guidelines (including EU HAR and relevant Border Specific Annex, BSA ), (expressed in /MWh) and summarized in table 1 for that MTU; Both Elia and Nemo Link commit to strive for having a monthly cap 3 approved by their NRAs in accordance with Article 54 of FCA for the compensation due to market parties in case of the reduction of allocated capacity. - Nemo Link will not compensate market parties beyond the applicable cap defined under EU HAR and as agreed by the NRAs pursuant art 54 of FCA; - where curtailment occurred on request of at least two relevant TSOs (amongst Nemo Link, NGET and Elia) and the cap under EU HAR is reached for the concerned period, Elia will hold Nemo Link harmless for the final compensation that is due to market parties for the curtailment performed upon request by Elia (in line with the principles of EU HAR Art 59.4 for pro-rata compensation of LT rights holders where the cap is reached). Table 1: Reason for reduction of allocated capacity Operational security limits Force Majeure Emergency Situation Before DAFD (Article 53 & 56 of FCA ) Day Ahead market spread 4 Initial price paid for the long term-transmission right during the forward allocation process Not applicable (situation not considered under FCA GL) After DAFD (Article 72.3 of CACM) Not applicable (situation not considered under CACM GL) - In case of allocated capacity via explicit allocation: initial price paid for the capacity during the explicit allocation - process - In case of allocated capacity via implicit allocation: difference in imbalance prices between Belgium and GB Difference in imbalance prices between Belgium and GB If Nemo Link reduces cross border flows as a result of a curtailment instruction of Elia without performing curtailment towards the shipping agents, Elia will compensate Nemo Link (or Nemo Link will compensate Elia) for the loss (or benefit) resulting from the corresponding imbalance charges (for the corresponding volumes) of Nemo Link in the Belgian and GB markets. 3 In case a monthly cap is not approved, the parties will strive for a yearly cap. 4 Corrected for losses if applicable, as specified in the BSA 5

3.2 Non-allocated capacity In accordance with the JOA, any ex-ante reduction (i.e. reduction of non-allocated capacity) of the capacity that can be allocated by Nemo Link in the day-ahead stage, due to constraints in the Elia grid and except for planned maintenance or works, shall trigger a compensation between Elia and Nemo Link. Taking into consideration the principles of paragraph 2, compensation shall only be due for a reduction of nonallocated capacity due to constraints in the Elia grid as indicated in Figure 1 (red block Reduction due to constraint in Elia grid ): Figure 1 Reduction of non-allocated capacity In accordance with the principles of paragraph 2, capacity shall only be compensated once. Hence, any reduced amount of allocated capacity (which triggered compensation between Elia and Nemo Link) shall, for compensation purposes, not be considered as non-allocated capacity for allocation in later timeframes. For the sake of clarity, suppose that Nemo Link allocated 800 MW of LT rights, which were reduced to 600 MW upon request of Elia due to constraints in the Elia grid (triggering a compensation), then compensation for a reduction of non-allocated capacity in the day-ahead stage will only be due in case the capacity that can be allocated in the day-ahead stage is reduced below 200 MW. This is further explained in Figure 2, in which case the reduction for non-allocated capacity will only apply to the red block ( Reduction due to constraint in Elia grid ). 6

Figure 2 Capacity shall only be compensated once The limitation due to constraints in the Elia grid of the volume of non-allocated capacity that is available for the day-ahead allocation process (reduction of non-allocated capacity) could lead to opportunity loss (or revenues) for Nemo Link that can be subject to compensation. Compensation mechanism of non-allocated capacity Taking into consideration the principles of paragraph 2, Nemo Link shall not be subject to any financial damage or financial benefit for a reduction of non-allocated capacity calculated at 11:00 CET day-ahead 5 and due to constraints in the Elia grid (except in case of planned maintenance or works), subject to following conditions: - The compensation/remuneration will be based on the difference between the reference revenue and the effective revenue in the day-ahead timeframe. - The reference revenue will correspond to the revenue Nemo Link would have had if the reduction of nonallocated capacity wouldn t have taken place. It will be calculated based upon the difference in day-ahead market prices of the GB Bidding Zone and Belgian Bidding Zone that would have been observed in absence of such reduction of non-allocated capacity. These prices will be simulated by Elia and/or Nemo Link using the MRC simulation facility and the relevant order books. - The effective revenue is the revenue of Nemo Link in the situation where the reduction of the capacity effectively took place, not taking into account the compensation due. - If the reduction of the non-allocated capacity is due to a Force Majeure, or an N-2 situation in the Elia grid, then no compensation will be due from Elia to Nemo Link. 5 When pricing of intraday capacity becomes applicable in accordance with article 55 of the CACM Guideline, a reduction of the NTC during the intraday timeframe may also lead to opportunity costs or revenues for Nemo Link. The Parties will discuss in good faith whether compensation should apply for such reduction subject to CREG approval. 7

The compensation between Elia and Nemo Link for non-allocated capacity is applied as follows: 1. If the reference revenue > the effective revenue, then compensation is due from Elia to Nemo Link. 2. If the reference revenue < the effective revenue, then compensation is due from Nemo Link to Elia 4 Settlement & Payment This paragraph assumes that Nemo Link, or an entity appointed by Nemo Link, settles the respective amounts towards market parties and/or shipping agents. In case Elia would directly compensate market parties and/or shipping agents, no compensation for reduction of allocated capacity will be due towards Nemo Link. An Invoice will be issued in the event of compensation due by one party to the other party, for the reduction of allocated and/or non-allocated capacity. The principles for invoicing will be as follows: - Monthly invoicing will apply; - An invoice will include all the compensation events for the respective month; - The different events and the related compensation amounts that occurred within the respective month must be mentioned separately on the invoice; - The invoice must take into account the respective compensation cap for the concerned period The invoice process will have following steps: - Nemo Link will prepare a pro-forma invoice which will be provided to Elia within a maximum of 2 months after the respective month of the invoice itself - Elia will verify this pro-forma invoice within 1 month - When both parties have confirmed the amount of the invoice, the party to which compensation is due shall prepare the final invoice and will submit this invoice to the members of the Operating Committee. - The invoice shall be approved by the members of the OC within a timeframe of two weeks - Invoices shall be payable within thirty (30) days after the end of the month during which the invoice has been approved by the OC. Invoice details are included in Annex 1 8

Annex 1 Invoice & Settlement contacts Financial contact data of Elia Company: Elia System Operator Address (1): Boulevard de l'empereur 20 ZIP code: 1000 Town: Brussels Country: Belgium VAT Number: BE 0476.388.378 Contact persons Department: Contact person: Department: Contact person: phone nr.: fax nr.: e-mail: Bank account details Company: Account nr.: Bank: IBAN Swift code: Tax/ VAT number 9

Financial contact data of Nemo Link Company: Address (1): VAT Number: Contact persons Nemo Link Limited 1-3 Strand, London WC2N 5EH, United Kingdom Department: Contact person: phone nr.: fax nr.: e-mail: Bank account details Department: Contact person: phone nr.: fax nr.: e-mail: Company: Account nr.: Bank: IBAN Swift code: Tax/ VAT number 10