Westport (Town of) CT

Similar documents
WILTON (TOWN OF) CT. Update to credit analysis. Credit strengths. » Affluent residential tax base. Credit challenges

Socorro Independent School District, TX

Town of Easton, MA. Credit Strengths. Manageable long-term liabilities. Credit Challenges. Reliance on reserves to address budget gaps

Sanger (City of) TX. Credit Strengths. Trend of growing reserve levels. Continued tax base growth. Favorable location 40 miles north of Dallas

Weber School District, UT

Butler (Village of), WI

Town of Beekman, NY. Credit Strengths. Solid reserve and liquidity levels. Low debt burden with rapid repayment. Credit Challenges

Socorro Independent School District, TX

Newport News (City of) VA

City of Mesquite, TX

Columbia School District, MO

Lubbock (City of), TX

Montgomery County, TX

Rockwall County, TX. Summary Rating Rationale. Credit Strengths. Above average socioeconomic indices. Credit Challenge

Carroll (County of) MD

St. Mary's County, MD

City of Oak Creek, WI

Huffman Independent School District, TX

Cocoa (City of) FL. Update to credit analysis following assignment of Aa2 issuer rating. CREDIT OPINION 12 April Summary.

Cherokee County Board of Education, AL

Allen Independent School District, TX

Wicomico County, MD. Credit Strengths. » Well-funded pension plan. Credit Challenges. Factors that Could Lead to an Upgrade

Prince William County, VA

Snohomish County Public Utility District 1

Volusia County School District (FL)

Celina Independent School District, TX

Somerset Hills School District, NJ

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa2 to Framingham, MA's $43.9M GO bonds, MIG 1 to $4.4M GO BANs

Newport News, VA. Summary Rating Rationale. Credit Strengths. Strong financial management. Credit Challenges. Below average demographics

Roselle Park Borough, NJ

West Fargo Public School District No. 6, ND

Edison (Township of) NJ

Park District of La Grange, IL

Bristol (City of) CT

Bothell (City of) WA

Prince William County, VA

City of Oakland, CA. Update to Credit Analysis. CREDIT OPINION 19 April Summary

Township of Tredyffrin, PA

Port Jefferson Union Free School District, NY

George W. Kuhn Drainage District (Oakland County), MI

Taos Municipal School District 1, NM

Findlay City School District, OH

Bexar County, TX. Exhibit 1 Assessed Valuation Gains Reflect Continued Economic Activity CLIENT SERVICES. Source: Bexar County, TX,

City of Tega Cay, SC. Annual Comment on Tega Cay RATING. ISSUER COMMENT 23 March 2018

New Issue: Moody's upgrades Edgewater, NJ's GO to Aa2: assigns MIG 1 to $15.4M in BANs

City of Las Cruces, NM

Agenda. New Mexico School District Bond Ratings 9/8/17

Montgomery County, TX

Dallas County Community College District, TX

New Rochelle City School District, NY

Rio Rancho, NM. Credit Strengths. Sizeable and stable tax base. Healthy reserves. Manageable debt burden with rapid payout.

Celina Independent School District, TX

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa3 to West Virginia SBA's $44.4M Capital Improvement Ref. Rev. Bonds, Ser Global Credit Research - 08 Sep 2017

Rating Update: Moody's affirms Aa3 on Waukegan Park District, IL's GO debt

Masconomet Regional School District, MA

Hoover (City of), AL

State Outlook: Debt Affordability. NCSL Conference Gail Sussman, Managing Director

Evanston (City of), IL

Las Cruces School District 2, NM

Connecticut (State of) State Revolving Fund

Rating Action: Moody's Upgrades the City of Sacramento, CA's Lease Revenue Bonds to A1; Confirms Ser and Ser. 1993A at A2; outlook is stable

Massachusetts (Commonwealth of)

Duquesne University of the Holy Spirit, PA

Township of Nutley, NJ

OECD Workshop on Data Collection

Bernalillo Municipal School District 1 (Sandoval County), NM

Findlay City School District, OH

Evanston (City of) IL

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa2 UND/Aa3 ENH to Roswell ISD (Chaves County), NM's GOULT bonds, Ser Sep 2018

Los Alamos Public School District, NM

Special Tax: Transportation-Related

City of Isle of Palms, SC

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aaa to Bronxville NY's $5.2M GO Bonds

Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings

Oakland (City of), CA

Grinnell College, IA

City of Providence, RI

Shreveport, LA. Credit Strengths. Credit Challenges. Very limited liquidity. Weak income and employment trends. Factors that Could Lead to an Upgrade

The College of New Jersey, NJ

Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings in the European Union

Jersey City Community Charter School, NJ

Sevierville (City of) TN

Moody s Upgrades Montco s Outlook

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A1 to UConn GO bonds supported by State of Connecticut; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 29 Mar 2018

US Local Government GO Debt Methodology

Duquesne University, PA

New Issue: Moody's assigns A1 to Ford County USD No. 443's (KS) GOs Series 2015-A and Series 2015-B

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Lowe's unsecured ratings to Baa1; P-2 commercial paper rating affirmed 12 Dec 2018

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa3 to Trinity Health Credit Group's (MI) Ser bonds; outlook revised to stable

Concord Hospital, NH

Mongolian Banking System

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A2 to 2016B & C Senior Bonds of Central Florida Expressway Auth. (CFX), FL; Outlook positive

Alamogordo Municipal School District No. 1 (Otero County), NM

Siauliu Bankas, AB. Siauliu Bankas capital metrics will strengthen with EBRD s debt-to-equity conversion. ISSUER COMMENT 13 August 2018

Underwriting standards for credit cards and auto loans tighten modestly, a positive

Cuyahoga County, OH. New Issue - Moody's Assigns Aa2 to Cuyahoga County, OH's Sales Tax Revenue Bonds. CREDIT OPINION 25 September 2017.

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Aa1 issuer and bond ratings of the International Finance Facility for Immunisation (IFFIm) with a stable outlook

Regional Economic Outlook

American Samoa (Territory of)

Policy on the "SEC Rule 17g-7 of Representation and Warranties" (R&Ws)

Transcription:

CREDIT OPINION New Issue - Moody's Assigns Aaa to Westport, CT's GO Bonds, Issue of 2017; Outlook Stable New Issue Summary Rating Rationale Moody's Investors Service has assigned a Aaa rating to the Town of Westport, Connecticut's 6.9 million General Obligation Bonds, Issue of 2017 (Bank Qualified). Moody's maintains a Aaa rating on approximately 70 million of outstanding parity debt. The outlook remains stable. Analyst Contacts Robert Azrin VP-Senior Analyst robert.azrin@moodys.com 617-535-7692 Nicholas Lehman 617-535-7694 AVP-Analyst nicholas.lehman@moodys.com CLIENT SERVICES Americas 1-212-553-1653 Asia Pacific 852-3551-3077 Japan 81-3-5408-4100 EMEA 44-20-7772-5454 Moody's highest quality long-term rating reflects Westport's sizable tax base with extremely high wealth and income indices, and a manageable debt position. The rating further incorporates the town's well-managed financial operations marked by adequate reserve levels, a well-funded pension system, and proactive funding of the town's post-retirement benefits liability. Credit Strengths History of satisfactory reserve levels High wealth and income levels Strong funding of pension and OPEB liabilities Credit Challenges Uncertain state funding environment Inclusion of reserve appropriation in budgets Rating Outlook The stable outlook reflects our expectation that the town will remain fiscally sound given conservative budgeting practices and will continue to benefit from its sizeable tax base and above average wealth levels. The outlook also factors in the expectation that long-term liabilities will continue to be manageable. Factors that Could Lead to an Upgrade Not applicable Factors that Could Lead to a Downgrade Reductions of available reserves leading to a loss in financial flexibility

Inability to maintain structurally balanced operations Substantial deterioration in the town's tax base or weakening of socioeconomic profile Material growth in long-term liabilities Key Indicators Exhibit 1 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Economy/Tax Base Total Full Value (000) 13,636,315 14,306,009 14,803,065 16,108,614 16,602,815 Full Value Per Capita Median Family Income (% of US Median) 514,267 282.9% 534,424 291.4% 547,147 589,131 595,104 275.4% 316.6% 316.6% 212,343 215,348 Finances Operating Revenue (000) 196,876 205,354 219,173 Fund Balance as a % of Revenues 15.2% 17.2% 17.6% 17.0% 18.0% Cash Balance as a % of Revenues 15.7% 19.9% 20.4% 17.4% 20.3% Debt/Pensions Net Direct Debt (000) Net Direct Debt / Operating Revenues (x) Net Direct Debt / Full Value (%) 142,626 134,650 121,613 108,846 0.7x 0.7x 0.6x 100,942 1.0% 0.9% 0.8% 0.6% Moody's - adjusted Net Pension Liability (3-yr average) to Revenues (x) 0.3x 0.4x 0.6x Moody's - adjusted Net Pension Liability (3-yr average) to Full Value (%) 0.5% 0.6% June 30th fiscal year end. Finances pertain to the combined General Fund and Debt Service Funds. Source: Town's audited financial statements, Moody's Investors Service Detailed Rating Considerations Economy and Tax Base: Large, Affluent Tax Base Benefits from Favorable Location Westport's tax base will remain stable due to its very strong demographic profile and favorable location in Fairfield County approximately 50 miles from midtown Manhattan. The 16.6 billion equalized net grand list (ENGL) (as of 10/1/2014) has had 4 consecutive years of solid growth since a 7.5% drop in fiscal 2012. The five year compounded annual growth rate in full value of 2.4%, is well in excess of the Connecticut median indicating a -0.9% loss for this same time period. The town recently completed a town-wide property revaluation (October 2015) resulting in 7.97% growth in the Net Taxable Grand List (the assessed value which the levy is based on), reflecting strong growth in property values over the last few years. The tax base is diversified with the 10 top taxpayers representing only 3.7% of the total fiscal 2017 Net Taxable Grand List. Reflecting the strong property values in this affluent residential community, the town's ENGL per capita is a very substantial 607,205, more than twice the medians for Aaa Connecticut towns and compares favorably to the current national average of 88,913 for all cities and towns. Similarly, estimated per capita and median family income are also significantly above average at 337% and 317% of national figures, respectively. Due to its location in Fairfield County and easy access to major employment centers, the jobless rate at 4.0% (February 2017) was lower than both the state and national averages (5.5% and 4.9%, respectively). Financial Operations and Reserves: Stable Financial Performance Westport's financial position will likely remain healthy given its history of financially stable operations, conservative budgeting practices and target fund balance policy. The town has had General Fund surpluses in 7 out of the last 10 audited fiscal years through fiscal 2016 with one of the deficits at a modest 71,000. Further, the average available Operating Fund (consisting of General and Debt Service This publication does not announce a credit rating action. For any credit ratings referenced in this publication, please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the most updated credit rating action information and rating history. 2 : New Issue - Moody's Assigns Aaa to Westport, CT's GO Bonds, Issue of 2017; Outlook Stable

Funds) balance as a percentage of revenues over the last five years was 17.0% of revenues. The Board of Finance targets an unassigned General Fund balance of 9%-11%. Fiscal 2016 audited results were strong with the town generating a 2.8 million operating surplus in the Operating Funds. As a result, the available Operating Funds balance increased from 36.6 million to 39.4 million or a satisfactory 18% of revenues. Contributing factors to this strong performance was strong collections of prior year tax collections and deferred tax payments as well as higher than anticipated zoning fees and building permits related to the healthy real estate market. On the expense side, the Board of Education had a 1.5 million favorable variance related to salaries and purchased services spending coming in under budget. The fiscal 2017 budget increased by less than 1% and included a modest decline in the property tax levy (-0.1%) and 5.35 million reserve appropriation. Despite mid-year state education funding cuts, management reports overall results are trending favorably and forecast a full replenishment of the fund balance appropriation and estimate a surplus of approximately 1 million in the General Fund. Drivers of this projection include positive property tax revenue variances and health care savings due to movement of some employees to lower-priced plans. Favorably, the town is not highly exposed to potential revenue fluctuations from state level fiscal challenges as only 1.6% of fiscal 2016 revenues were derived from intergovernmental aid. Further, state aid revenue assumptions in the Board of Finance's recommended budget was conservative. However, a proposed shift in teachers' pension costs to the town from the state in the Governor's budget was not included in the town's preliminary budget. This additional expense would amount to nearly 6 million in fiscal 2018, although there is a lack of support for this proposal in the legislature making passage in the final budget unlikely. The fiscal 2018 Board of Finance recommended budget proposes a 0.5% cut and the adopted budget will likely continue the trend of reserve appropriations. Healthy reserve levels in the Capital Nonrecurring Fund (5.9 million as fiscal 2016) and internal service funds (6.5 million) provide an additional layer of financial flexibility for the town. LIQUIDITY Operating Funds' net cash balance was satisfactory at 44.6 million or 20.3% of fiscal 2016 revenues. Debt and Pensions: Low Long-Term Liabilities; Strong Pension and OPEB Funding The town's net direct debt burden (pro forma including this issuance) of 0.6% of ENGL is below average for Connecticut towns and will continue to be low in the coming years given a rapid 10-year amortization of 94% of principal and manageable debt issuance plans consisting of approximately 44.6 million over the next 4 fiscal years. Fixed costs (comprised of pension, OPEB and debt service) are a moderate 15% of expenditures but include full funding of the OPEB annual required contribution. DEBT STRUCTURE All of Westport's debt is fixed rate. DEBT-RELATED DERIVATIVES Westport has no derivatives. PENSIONS AND OPEB Westport's willingness to aggressively address its pension and other post employment benefit liabilities is a key credit strength. Westport contributes to five retirement plans for its employees. Reported funding levels are healthy and range from 81.8% to 102.3%. The towns fiscal 2016 adjusted net pension liability, under Moody's methodology for adjusting reported pension data, is 121 million (3 year average), or a below average burden, representing 0.6 times operating revenues, which is significantly lower than the national median for Moody's-rated credits of approximately 1.5 times. Moody's uses the adjusted net pension liability to improve comparability of reported pension liabilities. The adjustments are not intended to replace the towns reported liability information, but to improve comparability with other rated entities. As of the July 1, 2014 valuation, OPEB unfunded liability is 77.1 million. In fiscal 2016, the town made a 9.7 million contribution, which was equal to 100% of the annual required contribution. The plan is 26.8% funded, a notably high percentage relative to most municipalities in Connecticut and nationwide. 3 : New Issue - Moody's Assigns Aaa to Westport, CT's GO Bonds, Issue of 2017; Outlook Stable

Management and Governance: Long-Term Capital Planning Management practices long-term capital planning and typically budgets conservatively. Connecticut Cities have an Institutional Framework score of Aa, which is high compared to the nation. Institutional Framework scores measure a sector's legal ability to increase revenues and decrease expenditures. Connecticut cities major revenue source, property taxes, is not subject to any caps. Unpredictable revenue fluctuations tend to be minor, or under 5% annually. Across the sector, fixed and mandated costs are generally greater than 25% of expenditures. Connecticut has public sector unions and additional constraints, which limit the ability to cut expenditures. Unpredictable expenditure fluctuations tend to be minor, under 5% annually. Legal Security The town's bonds are general obligations of the town supported by an unlimited property tax pledge. Use of Proceeds The bond proceeds will be used to finance various capital projects of the town and its schools. Obligor Profile Westport is a very affluent residential community located in Fairfield County, approximately 50 miles from midtown Manhattan. The town has an estimated population of 27,343. Methodology The principal methodology used in this rating was US Local Government General Obligation Debt published in December 2016. Please see the Rating Methodologies page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology. Ratings Exhibit 2 Issue General Obligation Bonds, Issue of 2017 (Bank Qualified) Rating Type Sale Amount Expected Sale Date Rating Description Rating Aaa Underlying LT 6,900,000 05/09/2017 General Obligation Source: Moody's Investors Service 4 : New Issue - Moody's Assigns Aaa to Westport, CT's GO Bonds, Issue of 2017; Outlook Stable

2017 Moody s Corporation, Moody s Investors Service, Inc., Moody s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, MOODY S ). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES ( MIS ) ARE MOODY S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE. MOODY S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody s publications. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY S. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. Moody s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody s Corporation ( MCO ), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody s Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from 1,500 to approximately 2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading Investor Relations Corporate Governance Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy. Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY S affiliate, Moody s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to wholesale clients within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a wholesale client and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to retail clients within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use MOODY S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser. Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. ( MJKK ) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody s SF Japan K.K. ( MSFJ ) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization ( NRSRO ). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively. MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000. MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements. REPORT NUMBER 5 1070954 : New Issue - Moody's Assigns Aaa to Westport, CT's GO Bonds, Issue of 2017; Outlook Stable