TWINSBURG CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS REGARDING THE DISTRICT S FINANCIAL LANDSCAPE MAY, 2018

Similar documents
Northwest Local School District (Hamilton County) 5-Year Forecast Assumptions May 11, 2015

Loveland City Schools FY Revenue

Brunswick City School District Five Year Financial Forecast Fiscal Year 2017 to Fiscal Year 2021 (Including Historical Data)

Copley-Fairlawn City Schools, Summit County Five Year Forecast Assumptions October, 2011

EASTWOOD LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT

CUYAHOGA HEIGHTS LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT CUYAHOGA COUNTY REGULAR AUDIT

Cloverleaf Local School District Five-Year Financial Forecast

Copley-Fairlawn City Schools, Summit County Five Year Forecast Assumptions May, 2011

LANCASTER CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT - - FAIRFIELD COUNTY IRN:

Bellefontaine City School District. Fiscal Year Five Year Forecast

Cash Balance June 30 15,940,136 15,271,647 13,479,243 12,241,640 11,698,295 10,837,831 9,756,394 8,379,673

Public School Finance 101

Brunswick City School District Five Year Financial Forecast Fiscal Year 2017 to Fiscal Year 2021 (Including Historical Data)

Five Year Forecast Financial Report

Hilliard City School District

LAKEWOOD CITY SCHOOLS

Continued TPP Reimbursement Critical to Preserving Long-Term Solvency of Highly Impacted School Districts

Five Year Forecast Financial Report

FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL FORECAST NOTES AND ASSUMPTIONS. For the Fiscal Years Ending June 30, 2014 through 2018

20 Years of School Funding Post-DeRolph Ohio Education Policy Institute August 2018

GLOSSARY OF SCHOOL FINANCE TERMS

Forecast Provided By Newark City School District Treasurer's Office Julio Valladares, MBA, Treasurer/CFO

MOHAWK LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Wyandot COUNTY, OHIO IRN #050740

FY18-19 School Funding Overview. FY16-17 Funding Formula

The property tax is the predominant method communities use to raise additional revenues in Ohio. The property tax comes in two forms:

Summary of Significant Forecast Assumptions Amanda-Clearcreek Local School District July 1, 2017 June 30, 2022 October 2017.

Five Year Plan Assumptions For Fiscal Years Ending June 30, 2016 Through 2020

UNDERSTANDING THE BUDGET

Miami County, Ohio FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL FORECAST NOTES AND ASSUMPTIONS. For the Fiscal Years Ending June 30, 2012 through 2016

Budget & Proposed 2019 Property Taxes

Licking Heights Local School District 5 Year Forecast Assumptions (FY 2013 FY 2017) Board Approved: October 24, Revenue:

MILFORD EXEMPTED VILLAGE SCHOOL DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2014 FIVE-YEAR FORECAST ASSUMPTIONS

Summary of Significant Forecast Assumptions and Accounting Policies For the Fiscal Years Ending June 30, 2013 through 2017

Miami County, Ohio FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL FORECAST NOTES AND ASSUMPTIONS. For the Fiscal Years Ending June 30, 2013 through 2017

Piqua City School District 719 East Ash Street Piqua, Ohio ASSUMPTIONS TO THE FIVE-YEAR FORECAST October 2013

Piqua City School District 719 East Ash Street Piqua, Ohio ASSUMPTIONS TO THE FIVE-YEAR FORECAST May 2018

Mansfield City School District Richland County, Ohio

LICKING HEIGHTS LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT LICKING COUNTY, OHIO

Marietta City School District Assumptions for October year Forecast

Albany Update. Northeastern Council of School Superintendents. Lake Placid October

COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FINDLAY, OHIO CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2006

NORWOOD CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT

PLATTENBURG Certified Public Accountants

House Ways & Means Committee Am. Sub. HB 64 Interested Party Testimony May 20, 2015

7.020 Cash Balance June 30 3,709,735 4,692,492 5,469, % 5,455,806 5,183,533 4,810,736 4,205,146 3,345,106

UNDERSTANDING THE BUDGET

GENEVA AREA CITY SCHOOLS FIVE YEAR FORECAST ASSUMPTIONS FORECASTED FISCAL YEARS ENDING JUNE 30, 2011 THROUGH 2015 Board Approved 10/20/10

Riverside Local School District

Change

Analysis of the HB 398 & SB 246 Changes to the CAUV Formula Howard Fleeter, Ohio Education Policy Institute December 7, 2016

GENEVA AREA CITY SCHOOLS FIVE YEAR FORECAST ASSUMPTIONS FORECASTED FISCAL YEARS ENDING JUNE 30, 2015 THROUGH

Our Mission. To inspire every student to think, to learn, to achieve, to care

RIVERSIDE LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY TABLE OF CONTENTS. Independent Auditor s Report Management s Discussion and Analysis...

Summary of Significant Forecast Assumptions and Accounting Policies For the Fiscal Years Ending June 30, 2018 through 2022

Here s another table showing the total cost of local school property taxes in both 2013 and 2014 assuming both levy proposals are approved by voters:

LOCKLAND LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT. Financial Statements. Year Ended June 30, 2017 With Accountant s Compilation Report

TIFFIN CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT

LANE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 4J (EUGENE PUBLIC SCHOOLS) LONG-TERM FINANCIAL FORECAST. January 2015

Madison Local School District

Berea City School District

CAROL F. CORBETT, TREASURER

DEER PARK INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT TAX RATIFICATION ELECTION FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS - Rev

Financial Readiness for Board Members

Five Year Forecast Financial Report

NORTH KITSAP SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET SUMMARY FY A Great Place to Live & Learn

BELLEVUE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT HURON COUNTY, OHIO

Dollars. sense. 2015/2016 Adopted Budget

2017 Tax Levy Presentation. Dr. Manville, Superintendent Robert Groos, Business Manager/CSBO Presented December 20, 2017

HUDSON CITY SCHOOLS FINANCIAL REPORT. October 2014 Five-Year Forecast Update KATHRYN L. SINES TREASURER / CFO.

Wisconsin Budget Toolkit

Loveland City School District

XENIA COMMUNITY CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT-GREENE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE

LAKOTA LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT-BUTLER COUNTY SCHEDULE OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013,

PARK HILL SCHOOL DISTRICT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

DALTON LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT WAYNE COUNTY TABLE OF CONTENTS. Independent Accountants Report Management s Discussion and Analysis...

10/16/2017 OCTOBER 17, 2017

WORTHINGTON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT-FRANKLIN COUNTY SCHEDULE OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE 30,

The Notes To The Five Year Forecast Are An Integral Part Of This Presentation.

OLC HB 64 - State Budget Analysis

Northwest Local School District (Hamilton County) 5-Year Forecast Assumptions May 27, 2011

A Citizen s Guide to School Funding

for Truth regional brief Does Duplin Need a Sales-Tax Increase? County already has $17.7 million in available funds

Long Range Financial Plan

Five Year Forecast Financial Report

Five Year Forecast Financial Report

Five Year Forecast Financial Report

Worthington City School District

Our Mission. To inspire every student to think, to learn, to achieve, to care

Five - Year Financial Forecast. Presentation to Board of Education Schoharie CSD

Springboro Community City School District

5 Year Budget Forecast

March Budget. Kasich budget underfunds education Some schools lose substantially

Enclosure C-1-c. May 9, 2016

STATE OF MINNESOTA Office of the State Auditor

Five Year Forecast Financial Report

Most non-farm jobs in Texas are in the general area of a. manufacturing.

Initiative #93 Funding for Public Schools. Amendment? proposes amending the Colorado Constitution and Colorado statutes to:

Understanding Montana School Finance and School District Budgets

Adopted Budget. Fiscal Year School District 27J E. 160th Avenue Brighton, CO School District 27J. Every Child, Every Day

Harrison Hills City School District Treasurer's Office Roxane Harding, Treasurer

Transcription:

TWINSBURG CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS REGARDING THE DISTRICT S FINANCIAL LANDSCAPE MAY, 2018 THE 6.9 MILL RENEWAL LEVY 1. What can you tell me about this levy? Didn t we see it on the ballot several years ago? This is a 6.9 mill Renewal Levy. It is NOT a new tax. It was originally approved in May 4, 1993 and has been renewed every five years since. It generates $4,883,121 annually. The prior renewal was overwhelmingly approved November 5, 2013. 2. Is this a continuing levy? No. It is a Renewal Levy for a period of five (5) years. 3. Will I see this levy on my tax bill? The Renewal Levy will NOT increase homeowners taxes. This Levy has been collected since it was originally approved in 1993. The Renewal Levy is for five years from 2019 and will NOT increase your taxes. 4. Why is the Twinsburg Board of Education placing the Renewal Levy on the ballot? The reason the Twinsburg Board of Education determined the need for the 6.9 mill Renewal Levy is to maintain the current educational opportunities and programs for our students. Simply put, families send their children to school each and every day, with the expectation they will receive high-quality academic programming, support services, and opportunities that will allow each student to achieve at his or her highest level and be prepared for their future. The Renewal Levy is a significant piece of the School Districts funding model. If the Renewal Levy does not pass, the loss of the revenue will significantly impact the District's ability to provide the services our students need and our community expects. 5. Is this Renewal Levy just to maintain or are there any new ideas being floated? The primary purpose for the Twinsburg Board of Education to Renew the 6.9 mill levy is to maintain the best programs and opportunities for our students based upon the financial resources available. The District will continue to monitor expenditures and seek additional opportunities to trim expenditures where possible. 6. Are there comparison charts of revenues and expenditures in surrounding communities? Residents can compare revenue sources for surrounding public school districts by accessing their Five-Year Forecasts and/or the Cupp Reports via the Ohio Department of Education s website: www.education.gov

7. Have facts and circumstances changed meaning was the intention always to have a levy again? We just passed a levy in May 2017. Why is there another levy? Under the leadership of prior Board of Education President, Ron Stuver, the Financial Strategic Planning Flow Chart was developed to map out the timeline for renewing the three current school district levies. Each renewal is an integral piece of the funding the Twinsburg City School District relies on to provide high-quality academic programming and support services. While the Board of Education and District administrators have been advocating to legislators for relief regarding the elimination of the business tax once known as Tangible Personal Property Tax (TPP) and now known as the Commercial Activities' Tax (CAT), we have not been successful reaching that goal. District revenue has been flat since 2007. Even with all of the operational changes, the District will struggle to be financially sound due to the elimination of the TPP/CAT business tax. TPP, a tax once under local/county control, was eliminated and replaced by a State controlled Commercial Activities Tax which is now being phased out in its entirety. The remaining TPP/CAT to be phased out is $4,632,944 as of 2015. The cumulative, compounded loss of revenue to the Twinsburg City School District between FY16 and FY24 will equal $27,358,522. 8. How does Twinsburg compare to neighboring communities? In May 2017, the U.S. News and World Report ranked Twinsburg High School number 46 in Ohio out of 886 Ohio High Schools and number 1152 in the U.S. out of more than 22.000 high schools. This means Twinsburg High School ranks in the top 5% of all high schools nationally.

CONSERVATIVE FISCAL POLICY 9. Please compare our neighboring schools expenditures on a per pupil basis. PER PUPIL EXPENDITURES FY17 FISCALLY RESPONSIBLE Solon 14,825 Due to the fact public education is primarily funded Bedford 14,616 through property tax, school districts in Ohio rely on Hudson 13,132 the passage of levies for funding to provide best Nordonia 11,740 programs and opportunities for our students Aurora 11,737 We project the per pupil cost will remain basically State Average 11,603 stable. According to the Cupp Report for FY17, the Similar Districts 11,237 Twinsburg City School District spends $10,933 per Twinsburg 10,933 pupil. This is $670 below state average of $11,603 and $3,892 less than our neighbors to the north. Source: ODE CUPP Report 10. Will class sizes be reduced with the renewal levy? No, the Renewal Levy is needed to pay for current expenses such as utilities, bus transportation, insurance, instructional materials, supplies, purchased services, wages and related expenses for certificated and classified employees. The passage of the renewal levy will maintain basically the same staffing levels. The District will continue to monitor class sizes and reassign staff members as necessary, which is our current practice. 11. We ve heard the Twinsburg City School District has a built up a cash balance. The Twinsburg City School District is fiscally conservative and has been frugal with every dollar it receives. The District has built a cash balance by cutting expenditures over the years and watching our pennies. For example, compared to 2004 there has been a decrease in the amount of dollars spent for Supplies and Materials. Furthermore there have been major changes to the State s funding for education. Since September 2010, there have been four (4) State enacted School-Funding Models (SF-3, PASS, Bridge, and SFPR) and a similar number of iterations of the TPP Phase-Out calculations. A less plan-full Board of Education and Administration could have foregone cutting expenditures spending available resources and then either let the State of Ohio take over the District or request larger levies when the fund balance becomes depleted. 12. Is the TCSD currently operating with a budget surplus or deficit? The Twinsburg City School District ended the 2016 school year with a budget surplus (revenues over expenditures) of $189,744. For the 2017 school year the District s TPP/CAT reimbursements were reduced by $824,703 and as such the result was a budget deficit of -$348,010 expenditures over revenues.

13. What happened to the TPP/CAT Tax money if it is not coming to Twinsburg? Phased out - Why? Government tax cuts? In Ohio, House Bill 66 (HB66) is legislation eliminating the tax businesses pay on Tangible Personal Property (TPP). The original legislation set forth that the State of Ohio would reimburse school districts for several years the amount of lost revenues. A tax once under local/county control has been eliminated and replaced by a State collected Commercial Activity Tax (CAT). The result is that Twinsburg City School District will lose approximately $9.8 million (23% of the current budget) and will be faced with significant fiscal challenges while the State of Ohio keeps the CAT tax money. 14. How much per year did the lost funds known as TPP contribute? Tangible Personal Property (TPP) was $9.8 million in 2004 when HB66 was enacted eliminating the TPP tax. The State s current biennium budget changes, for the fourth time, the laws governing the loss of TPP/CAT and eventually permits the State of Ohio to keep all of this revenue. From 2004 through 2015 the School District has lost over half the TPP reimbursement and only received $4.6 million in 2015. This revenue is being phased out and will be eliminated be 2024. 15. Last year, the Bulletin quoted a Board Member saying it is against the law for schools to run in the red. If that is the case, how and/or why is the State of Ohio allowed to decrease our funding? Approximately 20 years ago, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled in the DeRolph case and reaffirmed its ruling through appeal that the current method of funding public education in Ohio is unconstitutional. The legislature has made some attempts to correct the funding method that overly relies on local property taxes, but to date the court s ruling has not been satisfied. With each ensuing Biennial Budget Bill, State legislators establish budget priorities that do not comply with the DeRolph decisions. The Governor and state legislators seem to be more concerned with the politics of charter schools than supporting highly successful schools like Twinsburg, Aurora and Solon.

16. Have you looked at income tax for schools? Years ago, when legislation approved the collecting of an income tax for schools, the City of Twinsburg officials indicated they would not support the Twinsburg City School District accessing their revenue stream. Therefore, the Twinsburg City School District relies primarily on the collection of Real Estate tax dollars to sustain programs and services for our students. Typically, school income taxes are approved in rural areas where farmers own huge tracts of farm land and where levies reliant on property taxes are less attractive to voters. 17. What is being done to gain funding from the state? The Twinsburg Board of Education Meetings provide the opportunity to gain a great deal of information including the Board President s Report and advocacy efforts, current and pending legislative actions, the Superintendent s Report and State level advocacy efforts, monthly financial reports prepared by the District s Treasurer, and reports that include all avenues the District explores to contain and reduce expenditures. In addition, school publications including the District newsletters, District Calendar/Annual Report, Quality Profile and the District website include financial information and the essential components of fiscal stewardship the District practices to ensure prudent use of all taxpayer dollars. 18. Has grant money been looked into? The Twinsburg City School District continues to seek grant funding. However, the difficulty in securing large grants is the commitment the District would need to make in the sustainability of the project. Regardless, the District continues to investigate grant opportunities which are feasible and enhance opportunities for our students. 19. With the TPP Phase-Out, will TCSD no longer receive tax dollars from local businesses? The Twinsburg City School District will no longer receive the taxes businesses once paid for their equipment and machinery (TPP), however, local businesses will continue to pay Real Estate taxes, just like residents. 20. What has been the year-to-year increase in expense per pupil over the last four years since the levy was last renewed? Source: ODE CUPP Reports FY17: $10,933 FY16: $10,672 FY15: $10,645 FY14: $10,406

21. What proportion of our overall budget is accounted for by each category of expense? Source: Five Year Forecast - Fiscal year 2018 Please note, the chart below is only for General Fund Expenditures. Permanent Improvement Expenditures for buses, roofing, computers, etc., are not reflected on this chart. 22. What percentage of our revenue comes from local taxes? What percentage is received from the State of Ohio?

23. What are the District's projections for the changes in the student population? As of February 2018, there were 4,171 students enrolled in the Twinsburg City School District. One year ago the enrollment was 4,111 ADM per the FY17 Cupp report. At this time we are expecting our enrollment to remain relatively consistent COST CUTTING AND CONTAINMENT 24. What is the Operational Change Plan? The Board of Education and Administration have been concerned about the District s financial outlook for more than a dozen years. The most critical issue is the phase-out of Tangible Personal Property/Commercial Activity Tax funding. At risk for the District is $9.8 million a year, or more than $2,300 per student. One of the Board of Education s goals was to set a course of action to maintain a positive cash balance. After months of gathering feedback from our three communities, the Operational Change Plan was developed in 2012. Components of the plan included reductions in staff (45.6 Full Time Equivalents equaling 57 individuals), implementation of Academic Fees and Pay-to-Participate Fees, along with the implementation of technological strategies which increased the efficiency of the District s operations. The $3.2 million Operational Change Plan was developed after careful consideration of our community members input and with the focus being the continuation of excellent educational programming for students. The Operational Change Plan continues to be in effect today. 25. What else has the school district done to cut expenses? In addition to the Operational Change Plan, the Twinsburg City School District participates in several group purchasing consortiums. Through the Ohio Schools Council the District purchases items such as buses, liability insurance, diesel fuel, paper, cleaning supplies, and receives discounts on natural gas and electricity. The District also participates in the Stark County Council of Government. This is a large health care consortium risk sharing pool. Recently the District completed two HB264 Energy Conservation projects. The project at RBC replaced a boiler and lighting along with the replacement of lighting at Wilcox Primary School. The project at THS upgraded many parts of the heating and cooling system. These projects resulted in reduced utility expenditures by approximately $2.5 million since 2011. 26. Will fees be eliminated or reduced if the renewal levy passes? The Academic Fees, Pay-to-Participate Fees as well as the Building Use Fees are a part of the District s Operational Change Plan which remains in effect today. The fees will not be eliminated or reduced with the passage of the Renewal Levy.

27. Has the idea to cut transportation to private schools been discussed? By Ohio Revised Code statute, the Twinsburg City School District is mandated to transport students to private schools as long as the routes meet certain requirements (number of students being transported/distance to the school). Private school parents are also residents and taxpayers. Therefore, it is appropriate that the Twinsburg City School District transports these students accordingly. In instances where transportation is not feasible, the Board of Education compensates parents with an amount in lieu of transportation also required by statute and the Ohio Department of Education. 28. I am hoping that the renewal levy passes, but what cuts will be made if the levy fails? While the Twinsburg Board of Education has not yet identified the reductions in staffing, services and programming which will occur with a renewal levy failure, it is essential for all to understand the devastating impact this would have on the Twinsburg City School District and its students, as well as the negative impact it will have upon the value of homes in our school community. By law, school districts in Ohio are not permitted to operate in the red, meaning either a significant reduction in expenditures must occur or an increase in revenue must be gained through the passage of a levy. The passage of this Renewal Levy is critically important to maintaining the high quality academic programming and extra-curricular opportunities we offer our students The community will ultimately determine the quality of the Twinsburg City School District. Our Kids Your Schools