CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS IN THE HEADLINES: WHAT SENIOR MANAGEMENT NEEDS TO KNOW ABOUT HOW CDSs WORK, AND RECENT EFFORTS TO REGULATE CDSs

Similar documents
TREASURY ANNOUNCES PUBLIC-PRIVATE INVESTMENT PROGRAM

FINRA REQUESTS COMMENT ON PROPOSED FINRA RULE ON BEST EXECUTION

STATUS UPDATE ON TREASURY, FEDERAL RESERVE AND FDIC FINANCIAL MARKET INITIATIVES

SEC ISSUES DERIVATIVES CONCEPT RELEASE SIGNIFICANT CHANGES MAY BE IN STORE FOR REGISTERED FUNDS

SEC ADOPTS FINAL RULE 204 OF REGULATION SHO TO REDUCE FAILS TO DELIVER

SEC PROPOSES AMENDMENTS TO REGULATION S-P TO SAFEGUARD CUSTOMER PRIVACY

Increased Regulation of Private Fund Managers and Other Money Managers under the Advisers Act

FINRA GUIDANCE ON RECENT AMENDMENTS TO FINRA RULES RELATING TO SEC REGULATION M

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR PROPOSES EXPANDED DEFINITION OF FIDUCIARY UNDER ERISA

SEC REQUESTS COMMENT ON NEW SHORT SELLING PRICE TESTS

SEC PUBLISHES FINAL AMENDMENTS TO RULE 105 OF REGULATION M

HIRE ACT S EFFECTS ON INVESTMENT FUNDS

SEC PROPOSES AMENDMENTS TO MUTUAL FUND DISCLOSURE AND PROSPECTUS DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS

SEC ADOPTS SHORT SALE PRICE TEST

SEC PROPOSES ENHANCED DISCLOSURE AND ISSUES INTERPRETIVE GUIDANCE REGARDING SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS

SEC STAFF ISSUES NO-ACTION LETTER AND IRS ISSUES NOTICE RELATING TO NEW TYPE OF CLOSED-END FUND PREFERRED STOCK

PREPARING FOR THE POSSIBLE ENACTMENT OF CARRIED INTEREST LEGISLATION

CFTC PROPOSES HARMONIZATION RULES FOR MUTUAL FUNDS

SEC APPROVES NEW NASD HOT ISSUE RULE

SEC PROPOSES CONSOLIDATED AUDIT TRAIL FOR TRADING OF CERTAIN EQUITY SECURITIES

SEC ISSUES PROPOSED RULE REQUIRING REGISTRATION OF HEDGE FUND ADVISERS. Introduction

SEC ADOPTS AMENDMENTS TO RULE 12G3-2(B) EXEMPTION AND ENHANCEMENTS TO FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER REPORTING OBLIGATIONS

AMENDMENTS TO CFTC RULES FOR CPOs AND CTAs

SEC ADOPTS RULES ELIMINATING U.S. GAAP RECONCILIATIONS FOR FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUERS USING IFRS

RECENT SEC MARKET STRUCTURE INITIATIVES

NAIC HOLDS HEARING ON THE REGULATORY TREATMENT OF HYBRID SECURITIES. Background

SEC ADOPTS FINAL RULES ON INVESTMENT COMPANY GOVERNANCE

SHORT TERM PROPOSAL FOR REGULATORY TREATMENT OF HYBRID SECURITIES

Investment Management Institute 2017

NEW CORPORATE SENTENCING GUIDELINES PROVIDE GUIDANCE REGARDING WHAT CONSTITUTES AN EFFECTIVE CORPORATE COMPLIANCE PROGRAM

SEC PROPOSES AMENDMENTS TO RULE 12G3-2(B) EXEMPTION AND ENHANCEMENTS TO FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER REPORTING OBLIGATIONS

September 14, Proposed Rulemaking (RIN 3038-AC82) to Create a Separate Account Class for Customer Positions in Cleared OTC Derivatives

INITIAL GUIDANCE ON NEW DEFERRED COMPENSATION RULES

CHECK 21: CHANGES AHEAD FOR MUTUAL FUNDS AND THEIR CHECKWRITING PROGRAMS

SEVENTH CIRCUIT ADOPTS NEW STANDARD FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF MUTUAL FUND ADVISORY FEES

New York Washington London Hong Kong 120 Broadway, 35th Floor New York, NY P: F:

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive ( MiFID II ): Implications for U.S. Asset Managers

SEC ISSUES FINAL RULES ON DISCLOSURE OF AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERTS AND CODES OF ETHICS

Swaps Markets in Transition: Understanding the CFTC s Proposed Rule on SEFs

THE PENSION PROTECTION ACT OF 2006 NEW DISCLOSURE AND FIDUCIARY LIABILITY RULES

Derivatives Provisions in the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009

U.S. House of Representatives Passes Comprehensive OTC Derivatives Legislation

a copy of any required shareholder report, additional information regarding disclosure controls and procedures, and

IN RYAN V. LYONDELL CHEMICAL COMPANY, THE DELAWARE CHANCERY COURT REMINDS DIRECTORS THAT SALE OF CONTROL TRANSACTIONS REQUIRE ROBUST BOARD INVOLVEMENT

SEC Proposes New Rule for Fund-of-Funds Arrangements

FEDERAL CIRCUIT HOLDS EN BANC REHEARING OF PATENT MISUSE CASE AFFECTING PATENT POOLS AND OTHER JOINT VENTURES

FURTHER SEC ACTION ON MARKET STRUCTURE ISSUES. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC ) recently voted to:

Congress Proposals for Over-the-Counter Derivatives Legislation

CRS Report for Congress

Futures & Derivatives Law

Derivatives Market Regulatory Reform: Where To Now?

Crime and Courts Act 2013: Deferred Prosecution Agreements Code of Practice

Security-Based Swaps: Capital, Margin and Segregation Requirements

SEC ISSUES FINAL RULES FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES OF LISTED COMPANIES

SEC REQUIRES CEOs AND CFOs TO CERTIFY THE ACCURACY OF SEC REPORTS -- What should you do to get ready?

BREXIT UK VOTES TO LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION UK remains in the European Union - for now Implications for the Insurance Industry

John Gregory, Central Counterparties: Mandatory Clearing and Bilateral Margin Requirements for OTC Derivatives

CFTC Hearings on Energy Markets

Regulation of Energy Derivatives

THE ROLE OF CREDIT DERIVATIVES IN THE U.S. ECONOMY DECEMBER 8, Chairman Peterson, Ranking Member Goodlatte, and members of the

CFTC Proposes First Clearing Mandate and Finalizes Phased Compliance Rules

Testimony Concerning Regulation of Over-The-Counter Derivatives

Legislation Affecting Energy Trading: Recent Developments

SEC PROPOSES RULES ON INSIDER TRADING DURING PENSION PLAN BLACKOUT PERIODS

Proposed Legislation Affecting Energy Trading

MERRILL LYNCH PROFESSIONAL CLEARING CORP. (S.E.C. I.D. No ) BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 29, 2007 (UNAUDITED) * * * * * * *

Regulation of Energy Derivatives

CFTC Federal Register Notice

De r i vat i v e s a n d

Hatteras Core Alternatives Institutional Fund, L.P. Hatteras Core Alternatives TEI Institutional Fund, L.P. (the Funds )

Testimony by. Alan Greenspan. Chairman. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. before the. Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

The de minimis exception to designation as a Swap Dealer should be available to regional banks and dealers that intermediate regional Swap markets.

On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank

The Authorizing the Regulation of Swaps Act

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

The Enron Loophole. Mark Jickling Specialist in Financial Economics Government and Finance Division

Access VP High Yield Fund SM

FUTURES COMMISSION MERCHANT RELATED DISCLOSURE AND POLICY

January 31, 2017 CLIENT MEMORANDUM AUTHORS. Jacques-Philippe Gunther David Tayar Adrien Giraud Faustine Viala

Client Advisory. Treasury Proposes Legislation Overhauling Regulation of Over-the-Counter Derivatives. Financial Services

DBX ETF Trust. Statement of Additional Information. Dated October 2, 2017, as supplemented June 6, 2018

SEC Exemptive Relief in Connection with Effective Date of Title VII of Dodd-Frank

What End-Users of Derivatives Need to Know About the Dodd-Frank Act

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF CHICAGO. Research Department Financial Markets Group. 230 South LaSalle Street Chicago, Illinois U.S.A.

P: E:

WikiLeaks Document Release

CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

Client Alert. CFTC Publishes Guidance on Expansive New CPO and CTA Regulations

COMMENTARY. Dodd-Frank Derivatives 101: What In-House. The Basics JONES DAY

Proposed Treasury Exemption for Foreign Exchange Swaps and Forwards

Statement of Financial Condition JUNE 30, 2004

Bona Fide Hedge Exemptions for Commodity Swap Dealers

Representative Frank Releases Discussion Draft for Over-the-Counter Derivatives Reform

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Subsidiaries (SEC ID No ) Consolidated Balance Sheet December 31, 2017

Q&A Addressing SEC Proposed New Rule Regulating Funds Use of Derivatives

OTC Derivatives Markets Act of 2009

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION RULE 1.55(k): FCM-SPECIFIC DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT

SEC Approves Revised FINRA Equity Research and New Debt Research Rules

COMMENTARY. Potential Impact of the U.S. Dodd-Frank Act JONES DAY

MERRILL LYNCH PROFESSIONAL CLEARING CORP. (S.E.C. I.D. No ) BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 27, 2008 (UNAUDITED) * * * * * * *

Transcription:

CLIENT MEMORANDUM CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS IN THE HEADLINES: WHAT SENIOR MANAGEMENT NEEDS TO KNOW ABOUT HOW CDSs WORK, AND RECENT EFFORTS TO REGULATE CDSs All Eyes on Credit Default Swaps In recent months, credit default swaps ( CDSs ) have been the subject of growing public scrutiny. As defaults by sellers of these unregulated instruments have risen, there has been a call for regulation at the state and federal levels, increased disclosure and transparency, and investigation into possible fraud and manipulation. Those not intimately familiar with these popular and controversial financial instruments may be wondering how exactly CDSs work and why they are suddenly of such great concern to so many. The following is a brief introduction to CDSs, outlining the basic mechanics of a CDS, and some recent developments in, and proposed future regulation of, the CDS market. How Credit Default Swaps Work A CDS is an over-the-counter negotiated contractual agreement between two counterparties designed to transfer credit risk. CDSs are most often documented using standard forms and definitions prepared by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association ( ISDA ). The protection Buyer makes a fixed payment (either up-front or periodically) to the protection Seller, and the Seller agrees to pay a Settlement Amount to the Buyer under certain circumstances. The Settlement Amount is paid if a specified event or events (each a Credit Event ) 1 occur with respect to a specified company (the Reference Entity ) that is unrelated to the Buyer or the Seller. The fixed payment that the Buyer pays for a CDS is based on the market s perceived likelihood, at the time the CDS is purchased, that a Credit Event will occur. The cost of purchasing protection on a Reference Entity will fluctuate as, among other market factors, public opinion of the Reference Entity improves or worsens. The Settlement Amount that is ultimately paid by the Seller is a function of a hypothetical principal amount ( Notional Amount ), and the current market value, of a specified asset (the Reference Obligation ) 2 issued or guaranteed by Reference Entity at the time the Credit Event occurs. ISDA estimates that as of mid-2008, the aggregate Notional Amount of outstanding CDSs was approximately 55 trillion dollars. 1 2 Common examples of Credit Events include bankruptcy and payment default, but the parties to a CDS can contractually agree to name any Credit Events they wish. Common examples of Reference Obligations include municipal or corporate bonds, collateralized debt obligations, mortgagebacked securities, and various indices based on such debt obligations. NEW YORK WASHINGTON PARIS LONDON MILAN ROME FRANKFURT BRUSSELS in alliance with Dickson Minto W.S., London and Edinburgh

Many CDSs are purchased by a Buyer with an interest in the underlying Reference Obligation (or, if the Reference Obligation is an index, securities similar to those such index comprises) as a hedge against the Buyer s risk of loss on such Reference Obligation; for example, if the underlying Reference Obligation suffers a payment default, or the Reference Entity goes into bankruptcy, the Buyer would receive a Settlement Amount. Such a CDS is referred to as a Covered Swap. Additionally, a Buyer may purchase a CDS on a Reference Entity in which the Buyer does not hold any interest, in order to speculate (rather than hedge risk of loss) on the future creditworthiness of the Reference Entity (e.g., buying a CDS on a security issued by an entity in financial distress). Such a speculative CDS is referred to as a Naked Swap, and is distinguished from a traditional insurance policy, which is usually only purchased on an insurable interest (i.e., an asset in which the Buyer holds an interest). As the price of a CDS increases or decreases with the Reference Entity s condition, the CDS can be traded (via assignment) by the Buyer. In some cases, the Buyer of a CDS will require that the Seller post collateral in an amount sufficient to secure the Seller s obligation to pay the Settlement Amount. The amount of collateral that a Seller will be required to post under such a CDS will be related, in part, to the likelihood of a Credit Event, occurring (i.e., as a Credit Event becomes more likely, the Seller will have to post more collateral). However, the obligation to post collateral is a negotiated provision, and not a standard requirement of entering into CDS. As a result, Buyers that did not negotiate collateral provisions have unsecured claims against their protection Sellers. Even when CDSs are drafted so as to grant Buyers the right to request collateral from Sellers, some Buyers fail to exercise that right. The Seller of a given CDS may in turn hedge its risk by purchasing a back-to-back CDS from another Seller on the same Reference Entity, subject to the same Credit Events; the second Seller may buy a third CDS from another Seller, and so on, in a continuing chain of risk reallocation. Unregulated CDS Market and Increasing Defaults CDSs are generally unregulated today. CDSs have been excluded from the definition of securities under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the 1934 Act ) (other than antifraud and anti-manipulation provisions of the 1934 Act) and as such are not regulated by the SEC, 3 and the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 (the CMFA ) expanded the list of the derivative products, such as CDSs, that are exempt from regulation. Although not regulated by the state, disputes arising under CDS contracts are most often governed by New York State law. In September of this year, the New York State Insurance Department (the NYSID ) issued Circular Letter No. 19, which stated that the NYSID planned to begin regulating certain CDS contracts as insurance in January of 2009. However, the First Supplement to Circular Letter No. 19 issued on November 20 indicated that the NYSID would delay indefinitely its regulation of such CDS contracts and defer to the progress made toward comprehensive federal regulation of CDSs as discussed below. 3 CDSs are subject to the Investment Company Act of 1940. - 2 -

In recent months, rising rates of payment defaults and bankruptcies among Reference Entities have led to increasing numbers of Credit Events under the CDSs that name such Reference Entities and increased demands for the payment of Settlement Amounts. However, the Sellers of such CDSs have also been experiencing financial difficulties, and some Sellers that did not collateralize their obligations under their CDSs may lack sufficient cash to pay such Settlement Amounts. In those cases where the Buyer of one CDS is the Seller in another back-to-back CDS, such party may default on the CDS for which it is a Seller if it does not receive payment on the CDS for which it is the protection Buyer, triggering a string of domino-effect defaults. Additionally, as the creditworthiness of many Reference Entities has declined, and the likelihood that Credit Events will occur has increased, Buyers of CDSs that require collateral postings have made more frequent collateral calls on protection Sellers. Many of these Sellers have had difficulties meeting these collateral calls. Furthermore, there have been recent allegations of market manipulation via purchase of naked CDSs. Because the price of a CDS is regarded as an accurate reflection of the creditworthiness of its corresponding Reference Entity, any steps taken to artificially change the price of a CDS may inappropriately affect the value of the related Reference Entity. In recent months, suspicions and allegations of short selling (purchasing Naked Swaps) of certain financial institutions have been increasing. Recent Calls for Increased Regulation, Disclosure and Investigation Without federal or state authorization to regulate CDSs, governmental agencies have been unable to take significant action to address what is perceived by many (whether justified or not) as an escalating chain reaction of default, economic loss, and possible fraud and manipulation. As a result, there have been a number of proposals for federal regulation of CDSs, and the institution of guidelines for increased disclosure and oversight. The SEC - Request for Authorization and a Central Clearinghouse: The SEC has requested that Congress grant the SEC authority to regulate the CDS market. 4 Further, the SEC has called for the establishment of a central, unified clearinghouse for the sale of CDSs. Such a system would, the SEC argues, discourage fraud, alleviate the risk of individual Sellers being exposed to one another s credit risks, and allow the central counterparty to net individual CDSs against one another, reducing the liquidity issues now posed by an increasing number of defaults and requests for settlement in the intricate web of the current CDS market. 5 4 5 Testimony of SEC Chairman Christopher Cox before the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, United States Senate, September 23, 2008. In late September 2008, New York Governor David Patterson announced that the New York State Insurance Department was considering taking steps to (i) define covered CDSs as insurance policies, (ii) require protection Sellers to register with New York as insurance companies, and (iii) allow the New York State Insurance Department to regulate the covered CDS market. Gov. Patterson has since decided to postpone this plan following increased steps to regulate CDSs at the federal level. - 3 -

The Senate and the CFTC - Bills Proposing a Central Clearinghouse: During the 110 th Congress, which is now concluding, a substantial number of bills that would have provided for some increased regulation of derivatives were introduced. Although none of those bills were enacted into law, late in the Congress two influential Senators introduced bills in direct response to the concerns over the credit risks created by CDSs. S.3714, the Derivatives Trading Integrity Act of 2008 (the DTIA ), introduced by Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman Harkin (D- Iowa) and S.3691, the Financial Regulation Reform Act of 2008 (the FRRA ), introduced by Senator Collins (R-Maine), echo the SEC s call for a central clearinghouse and increased disclosure. However, the two bills reflect the continuing dispute in Congress and the private sector over what government agency is best suited to regulate CDSs. The DTIA provides for the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the CFTC ), not the SEC, to establish and regulate the clearinghouse, based on Chairman Harkin s position that the CFTC is more qualified for such a task. The DTIA would also revise certain modifications to the Commodity Exchange Act (the CEA ) adopted under the CFMA (e.g., removing exemptions for CDSs from the ban on OTC trading, eliminating assumptions that CDSs do not qualify as illegal futures/gaming contracts, etc.). The FRRA, on the other hand, provides for a joint effort by the SEC, the CFTC and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Board ) to establish and run the clearinghouse. The SEC would establish the initial rules regarding fraud and manipulation prevention, the Board would establish rules regarding examination of risk and information-reporting requirements, and the CFTC would be responsible for rules on position reporting and would handle ongoing regulation of the clearinghouse. The FRRA would revise the definition of CDSs to include all risk-transferring contracts (potentially encompassing within CDSs a variety of commercial contracts, i.e. letters of credit, guarantees, insurance, etc.). In addition, the FRRA would provide for the establishment of a Blue Ribbon Independent Commission to review the financial regulatory structure in the United States through hearings and investigation. Since both President-elect Obama and Democratic and Republican leaders in Congress have indicated that financial market reform will be a priority in the early months of 2009, we expect that versions of the DTIA and the FRRA will be reintroduced in the new Congress, along with what will probably be a large number of other bills that propose other approaches to regulating CDSs. The primary goals of all of these bills will be increased transparency and disclosure in the CDS market and the prevention of market manipulation. We anticipate that Congress will pass, and President Obama will sign, a CDS regulation bill, either as stand-alone legislation or as part of a larger financial markets reform package. Private Industry - Improved Public Information, Central Clearinghouse: On the private industry side, steps toward increased disclosure have already been taken by the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation, which announced on October 31, 2008 that it would make weekly website postings of the gross and net values of CDSs for the top 1,000 Reference Entities. Industry participants have also made public statements supporting the central clearinghouse concept. In addition, there is growing interest among many CDS dealers and end-users in establishing a central clearinghouse on which parties could trade CDSs and that would eliminate counterparty credit risk. This idea is still evolving and further developments are expected. - 4 -

Increased Accounting Disclosure Requirements: For public companies that are protection Sellers, increased accounting disclosure is already required pursuant to FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB Interpretation No. 45, in which the Financial Accounting Standards Board established broader disclosure requirements for reporting periods ending November 15, 2008 and beyond, including disclosure of the maximum settlement amount potentially payable under a provider s CDSs and the status of payment and performance risk thereunder. SEC and NY Investigations into Fraud and Manipulation: Both the SEC s Division of Enforcement and a joint New York State and New York City taskforce have initiated investigations into possible market manipulation with respect to the CDS market. The investigations are continuing, so that it is unclear whether they will produce any significant enforcement actions or regulatory or other reform of the CDS market. The Future of Credit Default Swaps The spotlight that has been turned on the CDS market in recent months has yielded a multitude of demands and proposals for government and private responses. Given the size and economic impact of the CDS market, in the current uncertain economic climate it is important that investors and market participants develop a better understanding of how CDSs work, what benefits and risks they involve, and how they may be regulated in the future. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * This memorandum was prepared by Thomas French and Jack Habert. If you have any questions about this memorandum, please contact any of the members of the Willkie Farr & Gallagher Credit Crisis Task Force attached, or the attorney with whom you regularly work. The Task Force (which includes UK insolvency professionals from our strategic ally, Dickson Minto W.S., and attorneys from our European offices) was formed to respond to client questions and provide targeted advice in connection with the credit crisis. December 17, 2008-5 -

Bankruptcy and Restructuring Matters Marc Abrams (212) 728-8200 mabrams@willkie.com Shelley Chapman (212) 728-8268 schapman@willkie.com Matthew Feldman (212) 728-8651 mfeldman@willkie.com Michael Kelly (212) 728-8686 mkelly@willkie.com Alan Lipkin (212) 728-8240 alipkin@willkie.com Paul Shalhoub (212) 728-8764 pshalhoub@willkie.com CREDIT CRISIS TASK FORCE Prime Brokerage Agreements and Broker-Dealer Issues Roger Blanc (212) 728-8206 rblanc@willkie.com Larry Bergmann (202) 303-1103 lbergmann@willkie.com Matthew Comstock (202) 303-1257 mcomstock@willkie.com Government Rescue Russell Smith (202) 303-1116 rsmith@willkie.com Gregory Astrachan (212) 728-8608 gastrachan@willkie.com Securitizations and Repurchase Agreements Jack Habert (212) 728-8952 jhabert@willkie.com Thomas French (212) 728-8124 tfrench@willkie.com Commodities and Futures Trading and Regulation Rita Molesworth (212) 728-8727 rmolesworth@willkie.com Litigation Benito Romano (212) 728-8258 bromano@willkie.com Derivatives Hedge Funds Securities Enforcement Jack Habert (212) 728-8952 jhabert@willkie.com Thomas French (212) 728-8124 tfrench@willkie.com Purchases of Real Estate Assets and Real Estate Related Securities David Boston (212) 728-8625 dboston@willkie.com Steven Klein (Real Estate) (212) 728-8221 sklein@willkie.com Eugene Pinover (Real Estate) (212) 728-8254 epinover@willkie.com Daniel Schloendorn (212) 728-8265 dschloendorn@willkie.com Rita Molesworth (212) 728-8727 rmolesworth@willkie.com Credit Agreements and Other Loan Documents William Hiller (212) 728-8228 whiller@willkie.com William Dye (212) 728-8219 wdye@willkie.com Jeffrey Goldfarb (212) 728-8507 jgoldfarb@willkie.com Gregory S. Bruch (202) 303-1205 gbruch@willkie.com Elizabeth P. Gray (202) 303-1207 egray@willkie.com Julie A. Smith (202) 303-1209 jasmith@willkie.com 1940 Act Registered Funds Including Money Market Funds Barry Barbash (202) 303-1201 bbarbash@willkie.com Rose DiMartino (212) 728-8215 rdimartino@willkie.com Margery Neale (212) 728-8297 mneale@willkie.com - 6 -

Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP is headquartered at 787 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10019-6099. Our telephone number is (212) 728-8000 and our facsimile number is (212) 728-8111. Our website is located at www.willkie.com. Copyright 2008 by Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP. All Rights Reserved. This memorandum may not be reproduced or disseminated in any form without the express permission of Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP. This memorandum is provided for news and information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or an invitation to an attorney-client relationship. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP does not guarantee such accuracy and cannot be held liable for any errors in or any reliance upon this information. Under New York s Code of Professional Responsibility, this material may constitute attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. - 7 -

2024 © financedocbox.com Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Feedback