Chairman and Members of the Planning and Development Committee. Thomas S. Mokrzycki, Commissioner of Planning and Building

Similar documents
National Disaster Mitigation Program NDMP Overview, Ontario Projects, and Final Call for Proposals

Staff Report for Committee of the Whole Meeting

Municipal Natural Assets Initiative (MNAI): Watershed-level pilot implementation in British Columbia. Call for Expressions of Interest

Purpose This policy outlines the methods the City will use to manage its Debt in accordance with the City s Guiding Principles.

Toronto and Region Conservation Authority - Additional Information for the Long Term Accommodation Project

Impacts from the July 8, 2013 Storm Event on the City of Toronto

Britannia Village Flood Control Project

Edward R. Sajecki Commissioner of Planning and Building

Smart Growth for Our Communities Act Highlights of Changes to the Planning Act

THE CORPORATION OF THE COUNTY OF DUFFERIN BY-LAW NO XX. A by-law to adopt Amendment No. 1 to the Official Plan for the County of Dufferin

DRAFT MULTI-YEAR Water and Wastewater & Treatment Budget December 17, ANNUAL UPDATE INVESTING IN OUR FUTURE. london.

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 26, 2017

Requirements of the Brownfields Financial Tax Incentive Program

5 Prudent Investor Status for York Region through Pending Amendments to the Municipal Act (Bill 68)

1. Call to Order The Presiding Officer calls the statutory public meeting to order and leads those present in a moment of contemplation.

EX30.5 REPORT FOR ACTION. Tax Policy Tools to Support Businesses SUMMARY

TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY

EFFECTIVE: June 19, 2013 REPLACES: n/a PAGE: 1 of 11

NINTH LINE CORRIDOR LANDS COMPENSATION RECOMMENDATIONS

Report to: Development Services Committee Date: June 26, 2017

Prudent Investor Status for York Region through Pending Amendments to the Municipal Act (Bill 68)

0319 Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario

Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Financial Statements December 31, 2006

Corporation de protection des investisseurs de l ACFM

RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT AGENDA

Planning and Building Table of Contents

JAXGIS FEMA Flood Hazard Mapping -- Frequently Asked Questions

Ottawa Public Library Board ACTION SUMMARY. Monday, July 7, 2014, 16:00 Champlain Room, Ottawa City Hall, 110 Laurier Avenue West

TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY

Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario

6 Draft 2018 Development Charge Background Study and Proposed Draft Bylaw Amendment

Strategic Flood Risk Management

This is the probable price that would be paid for the bare land as at the date of

TOWN OF LOGY BAY-MIDDLE COVE-OUTER COVE MUNICIPAL PLAN

Content Copy Of Original

RE: An Environmental Assessment for the Lakeview Waterfront Connection. Proponents: Credit Valley Co~se rvat ion and the Region of Peel

The Regional Municipality of Halton. Chair and Members of the Planning and Public Works Committee

A Modernized Conservation Authorities Act and Flood Management in Ontario: Building on Successes

Sioux County, Iowa. Mitigation Plan

Development Charges Update

The Alberta Party Flood Recovery and Prevention Framework

A Discussion Paper of Principles for Provincial Licensing of Electrical Contractors and Master Electricians

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF URBAN FLOOD PROTECTION

Financial Statements. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. December 31, 2014

Developing a Strategy for Your Public Housing Stock: The Provincial Perspective. OMSSA Conference

CITY OF VACAVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item No. G.1 STAFF REPORT August 18, 2015 ARROW FOOD AND GAS PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY (PCN) APPEAL

[Business and Tax Regulations, Planning Codes - Central South of Market Housing Sustainability District]

CITY OF BRAMPTON COMPREHENSIVE ZONING BY-LAW REVIEW. Technical Paper #3 Minor Variances

FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR LOCATION OF NEW FACILITIES FUNDED BY ALBERTA INFRASTRUCTURE

Apr. 21, 2009 Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario

Directive 019: Compliance Assurance

CHAPTER III - ADMINISTRATION OF CITY GOVERNMENT... 2

Number 63 of Planning and Development (Amendment) Act 2015

Canada and Ontario Sign Affordable Housing Program Agreement

Appendix B. A Comparison of the Minimum NFIP Requirements and the CRS

SOCIAL AND/OR ASSISTED HOUSING BUILDING OWNER/MANAGER APPLICATION

Township of Maidencreek, Berks County, Pennsylvania Request for Proposals Professional Legal Services For 2018

CRISP COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

Ontario Municipal Board

AGENDA OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO. October 19, Proclamations and Presentations 5:30 p.m.

North Oakville Secondary Plans Review. Livable Oakville Council Sub-Committee Oakville and Trafalgar Rooms May 15, 2017

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Planning in Water s Way: Flood Resilient Economic Development Strategy for the I-86 Innovation Corridor

Norma Trim, Chief Financial Officer and Commissioner of Corporate Services

POLICY 2.4 CAPITAL POOL COMPANIES

WYOMING INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION ACT

Strategic Plan CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL

10 Property Tax Treatment for Regional Transit Facilities

PLUM CREEK TIMBER COMPANY, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ADELAIDE METCALFE. Financial Statements. December 31, 2015

CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ADELAIDE METCALFE. Financial Statements. December 31, 2016

Damages caused by Flash Floods

Outline of the System Reform Concerning. the Utilization of Personal Data

Content Copy Of Original

Planning Commission April 19, 2017 Erin Cooper, Floodplain Specialist Varda Blum, Floodplain Program Manger

3 YORK REGION 2031 POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT FORECASTS

Subject Public Transit Infrastructure Fund and Clean Water Wastewater Fund - Federal Funding Programs

O.C.G.A GEORGIA CODE Copyright 2015 by The State of Georgia All rights reserved. *** Current Through the 2015 Regular Session ***

2016 Property Taxation: Targeted Land Assessment Averaging. City Finance & Services March 9, 2016

2017 PROPERTY TAX RATIO POLICY

New Tools for Mitigation & Outreach. Louie Greenwell Stantec

Reserves and Reserve Funds

Bucks County, PA Flood Risk Review Meeting. November 2014

Options for Changes in Federal Taxes To Encourage New Rental Construction

Report to: General Committee Report Date: October 24, 2011

CATFISH CREEK CONSERVATION AUTHORITY. Financial Statements. December 31, 2009

Application for an Advance Against Ontario Disaster Relief Assistance for Losses and Damages

UPDATE ON DALLAS FLOODWAY

Legal Services. Prosecution Civil Litigation Solicitor

Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance. Code of Practice on Consumer Credit Data

0 The Region of Peel has a long history of investing in housing and homelessness

CITY CLERK. Consolidated Clause in Policy and Finance Committee Report 4, which was considered by City Council on June 14, 2006.

Management Compensation Framework

IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE: SCHOOL SITE ACQUISITION CHARGE

Toronto & Region Conservation Authority (TRCA)

Mill Creek Floodplain Proposed Bylaw Frequently Asked Questions

The Regional Municipality of York. Reserve and Reserve Fund Policy

Illinois Commerce Commission. Consumer Services Division

POLICY TOPIC PAPER 1.0: SPECIFIC PLANS AND SPECIAL PLANNING AREAS

5 Draft 2017 Development Charge Background Study and Proposed Bylaw

MUNICIPALITY OF MIDDLESEX CENTRE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016

Transcription:

CD.04.COO DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Chairman and Members of the Planning and Development Committee Thomas S. Mokrzycki, Commissioner of Planning and Building Cooksville Creek - Special Policy Area Study MEETING DATE: October 1, 2001 ORIGIN: BACKGROUND: Planning and Building Department On November 18, 1999, Regional Council approved the following recommendation: RECOMMENDATION GC-311-1999 That the Region of Peel request the Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) to undertake a special policy area study of the Cooksville Creek, and assist the CVC and the City of Mississauga in this regard. This recommendation was approved in conjunction with the approval of Official Plan Amendment 69 which designated the lands on the west side of Camilla Road and north of the North Service Road as Residential High Density II. OPA 69 has been appealed by the CVC and the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing (MMAH) to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB). On February 28, 2000, the Planning and Development Committee considered a report titled "Cooksville Creek - Special Policy Area Study" dated February 8, 2000 from the Commissioner of Planning and Building and recommended the following: PDC-0042-2000:

PDC - 2 - CD.04.COO "1. That the Planning and Building Department request the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing and the Minister of Natural Resources to grant approval in principle for initiating a Special Policy Area Study to assess the potential for development options and acceptable risk within the flood-prone areas of Cooksville Creek. 2. That a copy of this report titled "Cooksville Creek - Special Policy Area Study" dated February 8, 2000 from the Commissioner of Planning and Building be forwarded by the City Clerk to the Credit Valley Conservation, the Region of Peel, Ministry of Natural Resources and the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing." This recommendation was adopted by City Council on March 8, 2000. Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) Board of Directors also passed a resolution dated February 11, 2000 requesting the City to undertake a Special Policy Area (SPA) Study for the Cooksville Creek watershed and advising that the CVC is willing to participate in this initiative. On August 25, 2000, the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing provided a letter to the City granting "Approval in Principle" to undertake a SPA study for the Cooksville Creek. On August 8, 2001, City Council passed Resolution 0222-2001 which, among others things, reconfirmed City Council's commitment to proceed with the SPA study and to use the findings from the Cooksville Creek Flood Remediation Study as background information for the study. COMMENTS: A technical committee has been established consisting of representatives from the Province, the Region of Peel, CVC, Transportation and Works, Corporate Services and Planning and Building. A Terms of Reference for the study has received approval from the technical working committee with the

PDC - 3 - CD.04.COO exception of the Province. Key components of the Terms of Reference include the following: Municipal Data Collection: compilation of information from appropriate studies that have addressed the flooding and erosion in the Cooksville Creek; complete land use assessment of the existing conditions of the Cooksville Creek flood plain including: existing land uses, identification of the locations of existing buildings and respective foot print sizes; determination of current approvals under existing land use polices and zoning by-law provisions and agency policies. Exhibit I shows the properties affected by the flood plain and their respective land uses. There are approximately 1,000 properties impacted by the flood plain which require examination of what is existing and what can be built under the existing regulatory regime. Technical Feasibility & Requirements: An examination of the technical feasibility of using the standard approach and non-standard policy approach for development within the flood plain including: determining if there are structural flood relief options available to the City; determination of the feasibility of flood proofing for individual sites both in terms of the structures and using cut and fill; determining the feasibility of using the Two-Zone approach (allowing some development along the flood fringe areas only); determining the feasibility of a reduced regulatory standard. This phase includes detailed hydraulic analysis to compare existing to proposed future development conditions. The CVC has stated that it will not accept off-site hydraulic impacts meaning that any option that would increase the depth or velocity

PDC - 4 - CD.04.COO of flooding on another property is not acceptable. The results of the Cooksville Creek Flood Remediation Study forms the basis for much of the technical analysis. Identification and Evaluation Alternatives: consideration of alternative approaches to the handling of the problems of the flood prone areas including upstream and downstream effects of the alternatives; determination of properties that would benefit from a relaxation of the policies; examination of a range of development options based on a range of flood proofing standards; determination of the desired use of the lands. Risk Assessment: examination of the financial and legal implications of proceeding with SPA policies. Although one of the benefits of implementing SPA policies is the fact the liability is shared among the City, the Region, the CVC and the Province, each of the parties must agree that the benefits derived from allowing development in the regulatory flood plain are worth the risks assumed. If at this stage City Council is satisfied with the technical merits of reducing the flood standard, then detailed Official Plan polices must be developed. Policy Formation: development of policies and information to be included in the draft Official Plan Amendment. Approval of the SPA policies will be required from the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing. Members of the Technical Committee have been advised that there are no guarantees that upon completion of this work that the flood standard will be reduced. Generally, Special Site Area Policies are created to allow for redevelopment of existing buildings within flood plains where otherwise they could not redevelop because of the flood

PDC - 5 - CD.04.COO proofing requirements. They were not created for the sole purpose of increasing the development densities in flood plains and promoting new development. Notwithstanding this, the study will bring a conclusion to the issue of whether or not there is potential for development within the flood plain and provide the basis of guiding development in this area. It is estimated that the study will take approximately six months to complete, followed by a public process which may take a further six months to complete. The findings of the SPA study will provide the information needed to resolve the technical flooding issues surrounding the OPA 69 appeal and address the feasibility of lowering the flood standard for lands in the study area. Budget Implications Although some of the background information is readily available, outside consultants will be required to complete the study as this requires expertise over and above City staff. Given the pending OMB hearing on OPA 69 and other pressures for development in the study area it is critical that the study commence as soon as possible. In so far as the cost of this study is not part of the 2001 City Budget for the Planning and Building Department, and it will still be a number of months before funding for this study could be considered as part of the 2002 Budget process, this report is being presented at this time for approval of the use of contingency funds. It is anticipated that an upset limit for the study of $100, 000.00 will be required to complete the work. CONCLUSION: Although, there is no certainty that the Cooksville Creek - Special Policy Area Study will result in a lowering of the flood plain standard, it will settle the issue regarding the feasibility of allowing additional development within the flood plain. It will draw on all previous technical studies, undertake some additional and risk analysis and provide planning rationale for further

PDC - 6 - CD.04.COO decision-making. Due to the level of technical expertise required and the multi-disciplinary approach required, the study should be completed with outside professional services. Further, this study needs to proceed as quickly as possible given the impending OMB Hearing. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That City Council authorize the commissioning of the Cooksville Creek - Special Policy Area Study to be undertaken by consultants for a cost of not to exceed $100,000.00 with funding from the Corporate Contingency Account as set out in the report titled "Cooksville Creek - Special Policy Area Study" dated September 7, 2001 from the Commissioner of Planning and Building. 2. That the amount of $100,000.00 be transferred from the Corporate Contingency Account to the Planning and Building Department current budget, account 1-715602-26741, to fund the Cooksville Creek - Special Policy Area Study for the year 2001. 3. That a copy of this report titled "Cooksville Creek - Special Policy Area Study" dated from the Commissioner of Planning and Building be forwarded by the City Clerk to the Credit Valley Conservation, the Region of Peel, Ministry of Natural Resources and the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing. Original Signed By: Thomas S. Mokrzycki Commissioner of Planning and Building K:\PLAN\POLICY\GROUP\_Reports\2001\P-October 1\reportoct2001.wpd