TO Users of Arrest Warrant and Indictment Forms (6th ed. 2010) Jeffrey B. Welty, author telephone:

Similar documents
Felony Insurance Fraud Offenses 2015 Annual Report

- 1 - IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE NOVEMBER SESSION, 1996

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 24, 2008

STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF PLUMBING, HEATING, AND FIRE SPRINKLER CONTRACTORS

NC General Statutes - Chapter 105 Article 9 1

NC General Statutes - Chapter 14 Article 19B 1

TAX NEWS & COMMENT MEMORANDUM

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 22, 2005

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

9.37 ATTEMPT TO EVADE OR DEFEAT INCOME TAX (26 U.S.C. 7201)

Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, allege as follows:

STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND BUSINESS SERVICES INSURANCE DIVISION

NOS CR CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS

North Carolina Department of Insurance

Case 1:10-cr BEL Document 1 Filed 06/17/10 Page 1 of 16

v. MISDEMEANOR INFORMATION

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No. 932 WDA 2015

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 14, 2004 Session

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA : O P I N I O N -vs- 6/14/2004 :

NC General Statutes - Chapter 20 Article 10A 1

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 H 1 HOUSE BILL Short Title: Casino Night for Nonprofits. (Public)

3:06-ar Date Filed 11/01/2006 Entry Number 259 (Court only) Page 1 of 10

... N.C. Office of Indigent Defense Services. PAC and Expert Spending in Potentially Capital Cases at the Trial Level.

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE MAY 1997 SESSION

Debt Setoff Program. Administered By. North Carolina League of Municipalities

Penalties; situs of violations; penalty disposition.

Ralph Edward Wilkins v. State of Maryland, No. 938, September Term, 2004

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 24, 2007

REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 1997 THEODORE MARTIN HARCUM, JR. STATE OF MARYLAND

: : : : : : : : : : CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Criminal Appeal from Mount Vernon Municipal Court, Case No. 01 CRB 773 A & B. Reversed and Remanded

- - X CONSPIRACY TO VIOLATE IEEPA AND THE ITR AND TO CONDUCT AN UNLICENSED MONEY TRANSMITTING BUSINESS. Background

FILED IN OPEN COURT U.S.D.C. Atlanta

COLLECTING DNA AT ARREST:

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE BIOGRAPHICAL AFFIDAVIT FOR ADMINISTRATORS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY. Court of Appeals No. L Trial Court No.

CLAIMS AND DISBURSEMENTS

IF YES TO THE ABOVE, PLEASE RESPOND TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS. IF NO, PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN TO THE UNDERWRITER.

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE JULY SESSION 1999

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA HALL OF JUSTICE COMPLAINT FOR ARREST WARRANT(S) GEORGE MICHAEL SHIRAKAWA

ARIZONA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Case 4:15-cr WTM-GER Document 1 Filed 05/18/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION

Case 1:06-cr Document 3 Filed 04/11/2006 Page 1 of 26. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE at CHATTANOOGA

NO CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL C JULY 3, 2002

FY 05 Actual FY 06 Budget FY 07 Budget

CASE NO. 1D Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

FY16 Actual FY17 Budget FY18 Budget

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA. Session Legislative Fiscal Note FISCAL IMPACT FY FY FY FY FY

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR

Assembly Bill No. 83 Committee on Judiciary

Criminal Disposition Reporting

FY17 Actual FY18 Budget FY19 Budget

UNOFFICIAL COPY OF HOUSE BILL 1040 A BILL ENTITLED

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs at Knoxville July 24, 2018

COURT OF APPEALS TRUMBULL COUNTY, OHIO J U D G E S

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 15, 2004 Session

Case 1:07-cr RMC Document 1 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 1 of 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

WORTHLESS CHECKS. However, according to section , the failure to pay for the worthless

SENATE STAFF ANALYSIS AND ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT

CASE NO CR CASE NO CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 19, 2012

Case 1:06-cr EWN Document 169 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 1 of 39 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

An appeal from an order of the Department of Management Services.

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Myanmar. Lex Mundi Global Anti-Corruption Compliance Guide. Submitted by Tilleke & Gibbins, the Lex Mundi member firm for Thailand / 27 Nov 2018

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Criminal Division, No. CC

N.C. STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 00-CO-929. Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia (M )

Insurance Service Representative

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

City of Morristown Beer Board

MARIETTA MUNICIPAL COURT WASHINGTON COUNTY, OHIO ANNUAL REPORT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO WARREN COUNTY. : O P I N I O N - vs - 2/10/2014 :

COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY. : O P I N I O N v. 2/1/2010 :

Do you need any special accommodations due to your inability to communicate, read or write? YES NO. initial

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 12, 2014 Session

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

NC General Statutes - Chapter 58 Article 79 1

Case 1:18-cr LY Document 3 Filed 01/18/18 Page 1 of 9. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS jp PH 1: 21 AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 1:09-cr RJL Document 3 Filed 12/11/09 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

NC Independent Living Attendant Sample Forms Packet

2017 PA Super 417 : : : : : : : : :

City Zip Code Work/Message Phone Number ( )

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Title 32: PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Case 3:13-cr KI Document 1 Filed 07/16/13 Page 1 of 9 Page ID#: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

COURT OF APPEALS FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

2010 PA Super 188. OPINION BY FITZGERALD, J.: Filed: October 8, Appellant, Keith P. Main, files this appeal from the judgment of

In The. Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE FINANCIAL ANALYSIS & RECEIVERSHIP DIVISION COMPANY ADMISSIONS SECTION REGISTRATION AND APPLICATION FORM

Rental Application N. Broadway, Boulder, CO Thank you for choosing as your new home.

COURT OF APPEALS MUSKINGUM COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

Melinda Benel Heilman PROFILE SUMMARY BACKGROUND REPORT. As of: May 24, Background Report for: Aliases: Melinda R. Heilman

Transcription:

MEMORANDUM TO Users of Arrest Warrant and Indictment Forms (6th ed. 2010) FROM RE Jeffrey B. Welty, author email: welty@sog.unc.edu; telephone: 919.843.8474 Replacement form DATE May 30, 2013 This is an interim update that corrects an error in the form related to G.S. 14-107, the statute covering worthless checks. In brief, the worthless checks statute requires that the defendant not have sufficient funds on deposit in or credit with a bank to cover a check. In some places, however, the form being updated refers only to the lack of funds on deposit and fails to mention the lack of credit. Failure to include the language regarding lack of credit is erroneous under State v. Edwards, 190 N.C. 322 (1924). Please contact the author with any questions or concerns.

page one of five Introductory Comment: This statute defines several offenses related to the writing of worthless checks. The offenses vary based on the value of the check, whether the account on which the check was drawn was closed or nonexistent, and the defendant s history of writing worthless checks. Charging Language: I. Felony worthless check (check in amount over $2,000): principal offender... unlawfully, willfully, and feloniously did draw, make, utter and issue and deliver to (name person who received the check) a check drawn upon (name bank) of (name city), (name state), for the payment of (give amount) in money. The check was payable to (name payee) and was dated (give date). The defendant knew at the time that the defendant did not have sufficient funds on deposit in or credit with the bank with which to pay the check upon presentation. II. Felony worthless check (check in amount over $2,000): aider and abettor... unlawfully, willfully, and feloniously did aid and abet (name maker of check) to draw, make, utter, issue and deliver to (name person who received the check) a check drawn upon (name bank) of (name city and state) for the payment of (give amount) in money. The check was payable to (name payee) and dated (give date), which was the date it was drawn. The defendant had reasonable grounds to believe at the time that (name maker of the check) did not have sufficient funds on deposit in or credit with the bank with which to pay the check upon presentation. III. Simple misdemeanor worthless check (check in amount of $2,000 or less): principal offender... unlawfully and willfully did draw, make, utter and issue and deliver to (name person who received the check) a check drawn upon (name bank) of (name city), (name state), for the payment of (give amount) in money. The check was payable to (name payee) and was dated (give date). The defendant knew at the time that the defendant did not have sufficient funds on deposit in or credit with the bank with which to pay the check upon presentation. IV. Simple misdemeanor worthless check (check in amount of $2,000 or less): aider and abettor... unlawfully and willfully did aid and abet (name maker of check) to draw, make, utter, issue and deliver to (name person who received the check) a check drawn upon (name bank) of (name city and state) for the payment of (give amount) in money. The check was payable to (name payee) and dated (give date), which was the date it was drawn. The defendant had reasonable grounds to believe at the time that (name maker of the check) did not have sufficient funds on deposit in or credit with the bank with which to pay the check upon presentation. V. Check written on nonexistent account: principal offender... unlawfully and willfully did draw, make, utter, issue and deliver to (name person who received the check) a check drawn upon (name bank) of (name city and state) for the payment of (give amount) in MAY 2013 G.S. 14-107

page two of five money. The check was payable to (name payee) and was dated (give date). The check was drawn upon a nonexistent account and the defendant knew at the time that the defendant did not have sufficient funds on deposit in or credit with the bank with which to pay the check upon presentation. VI. Check written on nonexistent account: aider and abettor... unlawfully and willfully did aid and abet (name maker of check) to draw, make, utter, issue and deliver to (name person who received the check) a check for the payment of (give amount) in money, drawn upon (name bank) of (name city and state) and drawn upon a nonexistent account. The check was payable to (name payee) and dated (give date), which was the date it was drawn. The defendant had reasonable grounds to believe at the time that (name maker of check) did not have sufficient funds on deposit in or credit with the bank with which to pay the check upon presentation. VII. Check written on closed account: principal offender... unlawfully and willfully did draw, make, utter and issue and deliver to (name person who received the check) a check drawn upon (name bank) of (name city), (name state), for the payment of (give amount) in money. The check was payable to (name payee) and was dated (give date). The defendant knew at the time that the defendant did not have sufficient funds on deposit in or credit with the bank with which to pay the check upon presentation. [Choose one: (1) The check was drawn upon an account that had been closed by the defendant before the time the check was drawn. (2) The check was drawn upon an account that the defendant knew to have been closed by the bank before the time the check was drawn.] VIII. Check written on closed account: aider and abettor... unlawfully and willfully did aid and abet (name maker of check) to draw, make, utter, issue and deliver to (name person who received the check) a check for the payment of (give amount) in money, drawn upon (name bank) of (name city and state) and [choose one: drawn upon an account that had been closed by (name maker of check) before the time the check was drawn; drawn upon an account that the (name maker of check) knew to have been closed by the bank before the time the check was drawn]. The check was payable to (name payee) and dated (give date), which was the date it was drawn. The defendant had reasonable grounds to believe at the time that (name maker of check) did not have sufficient funds on deposit in or credit with the bank with which to pay the check upon presentation. IX. Simple misdemeanor worthless check: fourth or subsequent offense... unlawfully and willfully did draw, make, utter and issue and deliver to (name person who received the check) a check drawn upon (name bank) of (name city), (name state), for the payment of (give amount) in money. The check was payable to (name payee) and was dated (give date). The defendant knew at the time that the defendant did not have sufficient funds on deposit in or credit with G.S. 14-107 MAY 2013

page three of five the bank with which to pay the check upon presentation. The defendant was convicted three times previously of the crime of writing a worthless check on the day of,, in the Court, County; on the day of,, in the Court, County; and on the day of,, in the Court, County. Notes about Charging Language: The statute applies to drafts also. If the instrument is a draft, substitute the word draft for the word check throughout. The date on the check should be the same as the date on which the check was drawn. There is no crime under this statute if the check was postdated. The aiding and abetting provisions of the statute apply to soliciting also. If appropriate, substitute the word solicit for the words aid and abet. Under State v. Edwards, 190 N.C. 322 (1924), a charge under this section that refers only to the lack of funds on deposit and fails also to mention the lack of credit with the bank is fatally defective. Sample Charges: I. Felony worthless check (check in amount over $2,000)... unlawfully, willfully, and feloniously did draw, make, utter and issue and deliver to Peter Piper a check drawn upon Central Carolina Bank of Durham, N.C. for the payment of $2,112.95 in money. The check was payable to Peter Piper and was dated October 30, 2005. The defendant knew at the time that the defendant did not have sufficient funds on deposit in or credit with the bank with which to pay the check upon presentation. II. Felony worthless check (check in amount over $2,000): aider and abettor... unlawfully, willfully, and feloniously did aid and abet John Rankin to draw, make, utter, issue and deliver to Fixit Hardware Store a check drawn upon Planters Bank of Raleigh, N.C. for the payment of $2,135.89 in money. The check was payable to Fixit Hardware Store and dated September 28, 2005, which was the date it was drawn. The defendant had reasonable grounds to believe at the time that John Rankin did not have sufficient funds on deposit in or credit with the bank with which to pay the check upon presentation. III. Simple misdemeanor worthless check (check in amount of $2,000 or less: principal offender... unlawfully and willfully did draw, make, utter and issue and deliver to K Mart Stores, Incorporated, a check drawn upon Central Carolina Bank of Durham, N.C. for the payment of $12.95 in money. The check was payable to K Mart Stores, Incorporated, and was dated October 12, 2004. The defendant knew at the time that the defendant did not have sufficient funds on deposit in or credit with the bank with which to pay the check upon presentation. IV. Simple misdemeanor worthless check (check in amount of $2,000 or less): aider and abettor... unlawfully and willfully did aid and abet John Smith to draw, make, utter, issue and deliver to Home Mortgage Company a check drawn upon Planters Bank of Raleigh, N.C. for the payment of $1,335.89 in money. The check was payable to Home Mortgage Company and dated September 10, 2004, which was the date it was drawn. The defendant had reasonable grounds to believe at the time that John Smith did not have sufficient funds on deposit in or credit with the bank with which to pay the check upon presentation. MAY 2013 G.S. 14-107

page four of five V. Check written on nonexistent account: principal offender... unlawfully and willfully did draw, make, utter, issue and deliver to Lloyd s U-Make Furniture, Inc., a check drawn upon First Union National Bank of Charlotte, N.C. for the payment of $35.47 in money. The check was payable to Lloyd s U-Make Furniture and was dated August 11, 2004. The check was drawn upon a nonexistent account and the defendant knew at the time that the defendant did not have sufficient funds on deposit in or credit with the bank with which to pay the check upon presentation. VI. Check written on nonexistent account: aider and abettor... unlawfully and willfully did aid and abet Sue Anne Delbet to draw, make, utter, issue and deliver to Terry s One-stop Shop, Inc. a check for the payment of $11.19 in money, drawn upon Wachovia Bank of Winston-Salem, N.C. and drawn upon a nonexistent account. The check was payable to Terry s One-stop Shop and dated August 4, 2004, which was the date it was drawn. The defendant had reasonable grounds to believe at the time that Sue Anne Delbet did not have sufficient funds on deposit in or credit with the bank with which to pay the check upon presentation. VII. Check written on closed account: principal offender... unlawfully and willfully did draw, make, utter and issue and deliver to Peter Graves a check drawn upon Wachovia National Bank of Raleigh, N.C. for the payment of $60.00 in money. The check was payable to Peter Graves and was dated November 1, 2004. The defendant knew at the time that the defendant did not have sufficient funds on deposit in or credit with the bank with which to pay upon presentation. The check was drawn upon an account that had been closed by the defendant before the time the check was drawn. [G.S. 14-107(4)] VIII. Check written on closed account: aider and abettor... unlawfully and willfully did aid and abet Susan James to draw, make, utter, issue and deliver to Kroger s Grocery a check for the payment of $83.24 in money, drawn upon Wachovia Bank of Charlotte, N.C. and drawn upon an account that had been closed by Susan James before the time the check was drawn. The check was payable to Kroger s Grocery and dated October 23, 2004, which was the date it was drawn. The defendant had reasonable grounds to believe at the time that Susan James did not have sufficient funds on deposit in or credit with the bank with which to pay the check upon presentation. IX. Simple misdemeanor worthless check: fourth or subsequent offense... unlawfully and willfully did draw, make, utter and issue and deliver to Sam s Towel Shop, Incorporated, a check drawn upon Wachovia National Bank of Durham, N.C. for the payment of $150.75 in money. The check was payable to Sam s Towel Shop and was dated May 15, 2004. The defendant knew at the time that the defendant did not have sufficient funds on deposit in or credit with the bank with which to pay the check upon presentation. The defendant was convicted three times previously of the crime of writing a worthless check on the 15th day of June, 2003, in the District Court, Durham County, on the 18th day of August, 2003, in the District Court, Durham County, and on the 25th day of May, 2003, in the District Court, Durham County. AOC Forms for This Offense: AOC-CR-107 (Arrest Warrant, for offenses III and IX only) AOC-CR-115 (Criminal Summons, for offenses III and IX only) G.S. 14-107 MAY 2013

page five of five Punishment: Felony worthless check (check in amount over $2,000): Class I felony. Simple misdemeanor worthless check (check in amount of $2,000 or less): Class 2 misdemeanor. For a check of any amount but not more than $2,000, when it is a fourth or subsequent offense of violating any provision of G.S. 14-107, the offense is a Class 1 misdemeanor; in addition, the defendant must be ordered, as a condition of probation, to refrain from maintaining a checking account or making or uttering a check for three years. Check written on nonexistent account: Class 1 misdemeanor (for all checks of not more than $2,000). Check written on closed account: Class 1 misdemeanor (for all checks of not more than $2,000). MAY 2013 G.S. 14-107