Marathon School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2018

Similar documents
School District of West De Pere Community Survey Results. Fall 2017

Lake Mills Area School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2018

Beaver Dam Unified School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2016

West Bend School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2018

Oakfield School District Community Survey Results. Fall 2018

Sheboygan Area School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2016

Gillett School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2018

Barneveld School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2017

School District of Horicon Community Survey Results. Fall 2017

School District of Somerset Community Survey Results. Fall 2015

Burlington Area School District Community Survey Results. Winter 2016

Freedom Area School District Community Survey Results. Fall 2018

Tomah Area School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2015

Muskego Norway Schools Community Survey Results. Fall 2015

76% The comprehensive solution put forward by the Community Steering Committee addresses a wide variety of needs at the high school:

Proposed Budget

General Obligation Bond Frequently Asked Questions. What is a Bond Referendum and what will voter approval of the Bond Referendum mean technically?

Superintendent s Preliminary Budget

BELLS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT

Montville Township Public Schools

School District of Slinger Community Survey Report

October. November. December-February. February-April. April. May. Administrators begin budget discussion.

Understanding the Costs: Frequently Asked Questions

AGENDA ITEM 11e BOARD MEMORANDUM. T0: Board of Regents, State of Iowa. Jean Friedrich. DATE: June 1, FY 2006 Budgets Iowa School for the Deaf

Franklin Township Public Schools FINAL BUDGET PRESENTATION BOARD OF EDUCATION MEETING APRIL 28, 2016

Introduction. Board Members

Frequently asked questions on the Ridgewood Public School Budget. 2. Why does the Board approve a preliminary budget?

Okaloosa County District School Board

KIMBERLY AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT

Our Mission. To inspire every student to think, to learn, to achieve, to care

DISTRICT HISTORY Referendum ($585,000) Purchase of 10 Acres / Football Field Original junior high building (present old section of MS)

Budget FY 2018 Budget Adoption. Board of Education August 28, 2017

SAULT STE. MARIE AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS. Board Budget Workshop March 26, 2013

Boards Role in Finance & Budget Development. Presented by: NJSBA Field Services Representatives

DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS COMMUNITY DISTRICT

Cherry Creek School District Profile of Student-Based Budgeting for Schools FY

ADOPTED BUDGET

FY16 BUDGET BASICS. Minneapolis Public Schools Finance Office Community Presentation

FALL UPDATE TO THE BUDGET. Lethbridge School District No. 51

Centennial School District Budget Message April 19, CENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 2017/2018 BUDGET MESSAGE April 19, 2017

Mequon-Thiensville School District Releases Administrative Action Plan

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) Shared Responsibility Mandate

Date: July 6, 2005 Proposed Plan Modification No. 21 ½-CENT SALES TAX REFERENDUM RESOLUTION CAPITAL PLAN MODIFICATION

Unified School District 208 Trego County Schools

HUENEME ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS BY COUNTY COUNSEL* BOND MEASURE T

LITTLETON PUBLIC SCHOOLS

SPOTLIGHT FORSYTH COUNTY BOND REFERENDA. Three bonds totaling $430 million. Taxpayers should get the facts. CITY AND COUNTY GOVERNMENT #481

Burbank Unified School District Issues Survey

F11 Freshman Check-in Summary Report

Telling Our Story. Celebrations, Challenges, and Choices

2016 Bond Steering Committee Meeting

MANKATO PUBLIC SCHOOLS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 77 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016

SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LADYSMITH BUDGET HEARING & ANNUAL MEETING OCTOBER 18, 2017

BUDGET ADVISORY MEETING #3 March 12, 2019 HIGH SCHOOL LIBRARY 7:00 PM 7:30 PM

Third Draft Budget March 5, 2019

District Budget Overview. Coatesville Area School District April 24, 2018

Plan Sponsor Administrative Manual

BUDGET MESSAGE. June 15, 2017

June 27, Dear Members of The Joseph Sears School Community,

Region: Year Total Expense Total Revenue Difference ,377,200 2,377, ,795,300 24,795, Prior Years

Our Mission. To inspire every student to think, to learn, to achieve, to care

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Tax Ratification Election

State of the District

Budget 2 nd Revision FINAL DRAFT

PRELIMINARY BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2018

Orange Unified School District (C) Copyright March 2018 All Rights Reserved

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS WITH INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORTS THEREON JUNE 30, 201Q

Profile Information USD 291 GRINNELL

Budget Workshop: Status of Budget Preparation

Adams County School District 50

LaCrescent-Hokah School District

SUMNER SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET

2018 SCHEDULE OF FEES

BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT OF SYRACUSE, NEW YORK JUNE 30, 2013

29th November Dear Parents & Carers, 2018 SCHOOL FEES

MINISTRY OF EDUCATION

COMMUNITY SURVEY FOR LAKE BLUFF SCHOOL DISTRICT 65

Oakland Public Schools

Caldwell-West Caldwell School District School Budget PUBLIC HEARING APRIL 28, 2014

CMS Proposed Budget September 14, 2010

Budget General Information (characteristics of district) Supplemental Information for Tables in Summary of Expenditures

PORTLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Hayfield Community Schools Bond Referendum. Vote Monday, September 11, Our Schools Our Communities Our Future

MURSD FY2018 Budget. Open Budget Hearing March 13, 2017

Oklahoma Tax Commission. Discovery Programs IRS Forms 1099 submission W2/W3 submission Voluntary Disclosure Initiative (VDI 2017)

SCHOOL DISTRICT FREMONT RE-1

Piscataway Board of Education

Employees Financial Wellness: New Strategies

Budget General Information (characteristics of district) Supplemental Information for Tables in Summary of Expenditures

COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT. The York County School Division Component Unit of the County of York, Virginia

BUDGET ADVISORY MEETING #2 March 6, 2018 HIGH SCHOOL LIBRARY 7:30 PM 8:00 PM

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQs)

Local ballot measure: B. Redding School District Bond Measure

Ballot Measures-T Section

Richland School District

COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL AFFAIRS. Board of Visitors. September 15, 2017

Budget Development Update

Galloway Township Public Schools

DRAFT Bond & Mill Levy Planning. Mill Levy CPAC Kick-off. Denver Public Schools. February 29, 2012

Transcription:

Marathon School District Community Survey Results Spring 2018

Survey Summary The survey was conducted in June of 2018. Residents within the District were mailed a paper survey. Each survey included a unique survey access code for those who preferred to take the survey online. Total responses = 501 (280 paper) Participation rate = 24%

Respondent Information

What is your age? 35% 31% 30% 25% 20% 20% 22% 16% 15% 10% 10% 5% 0% 1% 18-25 26-35 36-45 46-55 56-64 65 and older

Do you live in the Marathon School District? 8% 1% 91% Yes No Not sure

In which municipality do you reside? 60% 50% 40% 37% 30% 20% 10% 0% 20% 12% 12% 8% 6% 2% 2% 0.40% 0.40%

Are you an employee of the District? 17% 83% Yes (n=83) No (n=418)

Do you have children attending school in the District? 35% 65% Yes (n=174) No (n=327)

If you have school-aged children, what school(s) did they attend during the 2017-18 school year? Marathon Area Elementary 45% Marathon High School 39% Marathon Venture Academy 30% St. Mary's Elementary 13% Public school outside of District Other Home schooled Other Private/Parochial School 3% 2% 1% 1% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

Please mark ALL other relationships you have with the Marathon School District: 59% 60% 53% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 31% 20% 13%

How would you like to receive information District mailings School/District website Text message Record Review Attend meetings Parent organizations Attend School Board meetings Automated phone messenger Wausau Daily Herald from the District? Email Facebook Other TV/Cable 4% 1% 8% 3% 7% 1% 6% 4% 1% 2% 6% 5% 2% 10% 16% 17% 16% 16% 34% 33% 40% 51% 58% 72% 72% 72% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Non-Parents (Non-Staff) Parents (Non-Staff)

Achieving Academic Excellence

How well are we doing in the following areas? Great (4), Good (3), Fair (2), Poor (1) Item Staff Parents (Non-Staff) Non-Parents (Non-Staff) Delivering a high-quality educational experience 3.40 3.35 3.20 Building pride in our communities 3.41 3.44 3.17 Using technology to enhance the learning experience 3.44 3.17 3.05 Providing a welcoming and safe learning environment 3.21 3.18 2.99 Developing student character 3.15 3.27 2.92 Maintaining school facilities 2.60 2.90 2.92 Preparing students for life after high school 2.97 3.04 2.88 Making decisions in the best interest of students 2.90 2.94 2.83 Hiring and retaining high-quality staff 3.26 3.08 2.81 Meeting all students social and emotional needs 2.67 2.94 2.58 Keeping the public informed 2.68 2.76 2.53

Overall, how satisfied are you with the Marathon School District? (All Respondents) 100% 80% 60% 54% 40% 29% 20% 0% 10% 6% 1% Very satisfied Satisfied Not satisfied Very unsatisfied No opinion

Funding to Support Operations

Like many other districts in the state, the Marathon School District has been dealing with ongoing budget challenges. In an effort to balance our budget, over the past ten years, the District: Reduced employee health/retirement benefits Limited employee salary increases Reduced school and building maintenance budgets For the past seven years, the District has also: Returned $1.4 million to Marathon taxpayers by under-levying $200,000 per year Prepaid $770,000 in loans, saving the District more than $70,000 in interest payments Secured over $2 million in additional revenue through open enrollment Even with these efforts, the District is forecasting a budget shortfall averaging $685,000 for each of the next four years. The District will need to secure an operational referendum or make significant cuts to programs and daily expenses. The District does not endorse or recommend any of the following but, in order to address future budget shortfalls should an operational referendum not be successful, must consider all cost-saving options.

Cost-Saving Options Yes (10), No (1) Item All Taxpayers Staff Taxpayers Parent Taxpayers (Non-Staff) Non-Parent Taxpayers (Non-Staff) Should class sizes be increased to save money? 4.20 1.83 2.30 5.57 Should college/ap/elective courses be reduced or eliminated to save money? 4.30 3.93 3.25 4.86 Should salaries be frozen to save money? 3.83 1.83 2.69 4.76 Should curriculum and textbook updates be reduced or postponed to save money? 4.26 2.88 4.36 4.48

Would you support an operational referendum totaling $685,000? Representing an estimated annual increase of $77 for each $100,000 of the current home value over last year s level. All Taxpayers Definitely yes 23% Probably yes 31% 54% Yes Undecided 17% Probably no Definitely no 14% 15% 29% No 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Would you support an operational referendum totaling $685,000? Representing an estimated annual increase of $77 for each $100,000 of the current home value over last year s level. Staff Taxpayers Definitely yes 47% Probably yes 26% 73% Yes Undecided 11% Probably no Definitely no 8% 8% 16% No 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Would you support an operational referendum totaling $685,000? Representing an estimated annual increase of $77 for each $100,000 of the current home value over last year s level. Parent Taxpayers (Non-Staff) Definitely yes 33% Probably yes 39% 72% Yes Undecided 15% Probably no Definitely no 5% 8% 13% No 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Would you support an operational referendum totaling $685,000? Representing an estimated annual increase of $77 for each $100,000 of the current home value over last year s level. Non-Parent Taxpayers (Non-Staff) Definitely yes 15% Probably yes 28% 43% Yes Undecided 19% Probably no Definitely no 17% 21% 38% No 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Additional Analysis for the $685,000 referendum Assuming percent of Resident Population Assumptions - Non-parent/non-staff = 75% - Parents = 25% - Staff < 1% Of those responding either Definitely Yes, or Probably Yes:.25(72%) +.75 (43%) = 50.25% Assuming carrying 1/3 of Undecided:.25(77%) +.75 (48%) = 55.25%

Funding to Update Facilities

Improve School Safety and Security Estimated Cost - Elementary School: $1.32 million, High School: $665,000 What priority would you place on improving school safety and security? (Marathon School District Taxpayers Only) 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 66% 56% 50% 52% 37% 29% 30% 24% 13% 16% 11% 9% 2% 2% 1% High Medium Low Not sure All Taxpayers Staff Parents (Non-Staff) Non-Parents (Non-Staff) 2%

Address Aging Building Infrastructure Estimated Cost - Elementary School: $616,000, High School: $383,000 What priority would you place on updating the building infrastructure at both schools? (Marathon School District Taxpayers Only) 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 53% 41% 36% 38% 37% 30% 31% 28% 29% 24% 22% 14% 5% 4% 2% High Medium Low Not sure All Taxpayers Staff Parents (Non-Staff) Non-Parents (Non-Staff) 6%

Add Classroom Space Estimated Cost: $5.7 - $6.1 million What priority would you place on adding classrooms? (Marathon School District Taxpayers Only) 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 61% 57% 42% 37% 33% 24% 23% 24% 21% 24% 20% 15% 7% 0% 2% High Medium Low Not sure All Taxpayers Staff Parents (Non-Staff) Non-Parents (Non-Staff) 10%

Improve/Expand Kitchens Add Additional Cafeteria/Large Group/Multi-Purpose Space Estimated Cost - Elementary School: $2.4 million, High School $440,000 What priority would you place on updating and expanding the kitchens and adding additional cafeteria/large group/multi-purpose space at the elementary school? (Marathon School District Taxpayers Only) 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 43% 41% 35% 37% 40% 33% 35% 34% 27% 24% 19% 21% 4% 0% 1% High Medium Low Not sure All Taxpayers Staff Parents (Non-Staff) Non-Parents (Non-Staff) 6%

Renovate High School Lockers and Restrooms Estimated Cost: $1 million What priority would you place on renovating the high school lockers and restrooms? (Marathon School District Taxpayers Only) 100% 80% 60% 61% 61% 64% 59% 40% 29% 30% 26% 29% 20% 6% 9% 4% 7% 4% 4% 2% 5% 0% High Medium Low Not sure All Taxpayers Staff Parents (Non-Staff) Non-Parents (Non-Staff)

What priority would you place on High (3), Medium (2), Low (1) Item All Taxpayers Staff Taxpayers Parent Taxpayers (Non-Staff) Non-Parent Taxpayers (Non-Staff) improving school safety and security? 2.42 2.40 2.57 2.37 updating the building infrastructure at both schools? 2.05 2.13 2.17 1.98 adding classrooms? 2.03 2.45 2.37 1.79 updating and expanding the kitchens and adding additional cafeteria/large group/multipurpose space at the elementary school? renovating the high school lockers and restrooms? 1.93 2.19 2.20 1.76 1.43 1.45 1.38 1.44

Funding Support

The cost to address all the projects identified in the survey is estimated at nearly $13 million. Given the cost, it may not be realistic to complete all of these projects at one time. Therefore, the work may need to be completed in phases, based on the priorities of the community and its willingness to financially support the projects. The following table shows the impact to the school portion of your local property taxes for various referendum amounts.

How much of a tax impact would you support through a referendum, assuming the projects included were acceptable to you? (Marathon School District Taxpayers Only) 50% $13 million Non-Parent Taxpayers (Non-Staff) 11% 5% 15% 11% 10% 13% 11% 24% $10.5 million $8 million Parent Taxpayers (Non- Staff) 31% 11% 18% 14% 6% 3% 11% 6% $5.5 million Staff Taxpayers 38% 15% 13% 4% 6% 11% 4% 9% $3 million I would only support a smaller referendum than $3 million All Taxpayers 20% 8% 15% 12% 7% 10% 11% 17% I'm not sure/need more information 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% I would not support any referendum

Thank you!