Georgian International Arbitration Centre

Similar documents
Report on Formation of the Georgian International Arbitration Centre

Why Finland Should Adopt the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration Christopher R. Seppälä

Comparison between SCC arbitration and CIETAC arbitration

International Commercial Arbitration - An Introduction. Steven Lim Managing Partner, Singapore, Nabarro LLP 12 October 2016

4. Drafting arbitration clauses

Joint UNCITRAL-LAC Conference on Dispute Settlement

The Effect of Sanctions on Arbitration: Alternative Venues

Challenges and Considerations

2016 RUSSIAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION SURVEY: THE IMPACT OF SANCTIONS ON COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION

FACTSHEET ICC COMMISSION ON ARBITRATION AND ADR

Institutional vs. ad hoc arbitration: when and why?

Arbitration Provisions in M&A Transaction Documents

BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES (ICSID)

Bun & Associates ATTORNEYS AT LAW INTRODUCTORY GUIDE. Commercial Arbitration in Cambodia. Arbitration

BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES (ICSID)

THE EVOLUTION OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION

Arbitration in Hong Kong Latest Trends and Developments

International Commercial Arbitration

Arbitration Expanding Opportunities for Lawyers. Jamaican Bar Association/General Legal Council Continuing Legal Education Seminar

Brexit Paper 2: International Arbitration

Regional competition for the international shipping center: the development of maritime arbitration center in Asia

DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN SCANDINAVIA

INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION - THE ESSENTIALS.

RESOLVING COMPLEX INTERNATIONAL DISPUTES USE OF THE ENGLISH JURISDICTION FOR EFFECTIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION. Andrew Manning Cox

CASE STUDY: INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION FRAMEWORK AND PRACTICE IN TURKEY by BENNAR AYDOĞDU 1

Your Arbitration Agreement Matters: Tips for Drafting Effective Arbitration Clauses in the U.S. Andrew Behrman February 2017

Arbitration Article An alternative, cheaper and quicker way of dispute resolution

BEST PRACTICES IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION. Summary of Contents

12 September 2011: Release of the New ICC Rules of Arbitration.

Rules of ICC as Appointing Authority in UNCITRAL or Other Ad Hoc Arbitration Proceedings. in force as from 1 January 2004

60 TH UIA CONGRESS BUDAPEST/HUNGARY - OCTOBER 28 - NOVEMBER 1, 2016

Russian Arbitration Law 2016: key issues

In the matter of an arbitration under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules. between

Finnish Arbitration Act in light of the Model Law

Practical Tips on Commencement of Arbitration

CURRENT COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PRACTICE AND DEVELOPMENTS IN KENYA AND EAST AFRICA

Managing political and commercial risks by means of arbitration & White & Case. 4 th Managing Risk in Africa Dr. Markus Burianski, Mark Goodrich

Arbitration Rules of the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce

RULES OF ICC AS APPOINTING AUTHORITY IN UNCITRAL OR OTHER AD HOC ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS

WIPO LIST OF NEUTRALS BIOGRAPHICAL DATA

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF ARBITRATION LEADING DISPUTE RESOLUTION WORLDWIDE. Rules of ICC

1. Ad hoc and institutional arbitration in Italy

2 IN-HOUSE COUNSEL PRACTICAL GUIDE 3

Arbitration and Forum Shopping in the Seat

CHOOSE COPENHAGEN AS VENUE AND PLACE OF ARBITRATION

Preparing for ASEAN Economic Integration

NEWS. Mixed messages: developments in recognition of foreign arbitral awards in Russia

Pranav Mago Head (South Asia)

Session 5: Why Arbitrate in Hong Kong?

NEWS. The settlement deficit in arbitration

Legal Business. Arbitration As A Method Of Dispute Resolution

Arbitration Rules of the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce

the Home of International Arbitration

TRAINING COURSE ON MANAGING INVESTMENT DISPUTES FOR LATIN AMERICAN COUNTRIES Montevideo, Uruguay, November 2007 COURSE PROSPECTUS

ARBITRATION OF INTERNATIONAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DISPUTES

3. Full protection and security. Often interpreted as complementary to, and overlapping with, fair and equitable treatment, full

Introduction to Arbitration and Dispute Resolution under FIDIC. Dr. Asanga Gunawansa Attorney-at-Law

CURRICULUM VITAE. Professor, University of Bucharest, Faculty of Law, Private Law Department

CMS Guide to Arbitration

THE ROLE OF THE PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION IN DOING BUSINESS. Hugo Siblesz Secretary-General Permanent Court of Arbitration March 6,

The UNCITRAL Notes on OrganizingArbitral Proceedingsand the ASA Arbitration Toolbox

Role of the State on Protecting the System of Arbitration

INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION IN ITALY

Keys to Achieving Efficiency in International Arbitration

International Arbitration. One of the world s leading international arbitration firms. Global Arbitration Review

The Latest Innovation for Mediation in China From the Perspective of SCIA

Young Arbitration Practitioners (YAP) Conference

Introducing ICSID. International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes. The global leader in international investment dispute settlement

ANATOMY OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION. E. Y. Park Co-Head, International Arbitration & Litigation Group Kim & Chang 12 February 2018

PROGRAMME. ICC Arbitration TRAINING AND CONFERENCE. Melbourne, Australia, 28 November 2016

DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND GOVERNING LAW CLAUSES IN CHINA-RELATED COMMERCIAL CONTRACTS LEGAL GUIDE FIFTH EDITION

Guide to International Arbitration

Christoph G. Paulus, Professor of Law, Humboldt University, Berlin Steven T. Kargman, President, Kargman Associates, New York

Singapore's new legislation on arbitration and electronic transactions

Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP A New York Limited Liability Partnership One Battery Park Plaza New York, New York

NOTE TO PARTIES AND ARBITRAL TRIBUNALS ON THE CONDUCT OF THE ARBITRATION UNDER THE ICC RULES OF ARBITRATION

Choosing the right arbitration institution guidance for businesses on costs

International Arbitration: What it is and how it works. Outline of lecture

RULES OF ARBITRATION OF AMCHAM PERU (In force from September 1, 2008)

THE CHANGING DYNAMICS OF THIRD-PARTY FUNDING OF CORPORATE DISPUTES IN ASIA

Jan K. Schaefer. Matters 1

PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS - SWEDISH SUPREME COURT CONFIRMS A CONTINUING ARBITRATION-FRIENDLY APPLICATION IN SWEDISH COURTS. Christina Blomkvist, LL.

Swiss Arbitration Association Association Suisse de l`arbitrage. Arbitration in (and around) Switzerland

ASEAN Law Association

Staying out of court: Avoiding litigation in M&A

Arbitrability of IP Disputes in Russia

The 2012 ICC Rule Changes: Efficiency and Flexibility. by Eric van Ginkel and Jeff Dasteel 1

ARBITRATOR S GUIDELINES

Finnish Arbitration Act (23 October 1992/967)

ARBITRATOR S GUIDELINES

Vision: To be the preferred ADR choice in the region by Mission:

GUIDE TO MEMBERSHIP IN THE ICSID CONVENTION

International sale of goods and arbitration in Europe

Institutions for Arbitration Institutionalizing Arbitration in Pakistan

International Arbitration

International Dispute Resolution and Arbitration in the Oil & Gas Industry

RULES OF ARBITRATION 2016

Unauthorized Amiable Compositeur?

Arbitration Newsletter

EVIDENCE IN INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION

Transcription:

was founded with the initiative of the Georgian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (GCCI). The GCCI as the organization protecting the interests of business entities in Georgia, considering the significance of the establishment of independent and reliable alternative dispute resolution mechanisms in the country, took into account an imminent necessity of modernization of already existing old-fashioned and inefficient arbitration court at the Chamber. The GCCI relying on the international practice, according to which the Chamber of Commerce worldwide creates the arbitration institutions, founded (GIAC) in December 2013. One year of active cooperation of the GCCI and its partner organizations proceeded the establishment of the GIAC. The GIAC is incorporated in a legal form of a non-profit organization and it is not profit oriented. This factor is particularly important given the fact that the GIAC is the only not profit oriented arbitration institution in Georgia. Therefore, the GIAC is arbitration institution founded at the GCCI and it has replaced previously existing Arbitration Court at the Georgian Chamber of Commerce and Industry LLC, operation of which was suspended in 2012. The central objective of the GIAC is to establish neutral, efficient and flexible alternative dispute resolution mechanisms. With the consideration that there was no international arbitration institution in the region, formation of the GIAC was an event of a huge significance. Formation of GIAC - The formation of GIAC was one of the most significant GCCI projects. Considering the complex and comprehensive character of the project, it was decided to involve various interested organizations in its implementation for achievement of a successful execution of the project. With the initiative of the GCCI, the GIAC Formation Working Group was created for determination of the main actions, directions and structural formation issues of the establishment of an arbitration institution at the Chamber. The Working Group was composed of the 2014 1

representatives of the Ministries of Justice, Finance and Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia, also representatives of the Supreme Court, NGOs EWMI (JILEP Project), Transparency International Georgia, Georgian Young Lawyers Association, and as well as representatives of the private sector. The working group mainly worked on institutional matters such as the legal form and corporate structure of the prospective arbitration institution. From the outset, the target was to implement the international practice and experience, at the same time taking into consideration the Georgian reality. The Structure of GIAC is be a guarantee of the independence and impartiality of the Arbitration Centre, as well as of the resolution of the disputes efficiently and professionally. GIAC is structurally independent from its founder GCCI, it is a self-governing organization and such corporate structure is a guarantor of the Arbitration Centre s independence and neutrality. For this purpose, the corporate structure of the Center is determined in the following manner: The Board responsible for corporate matters and strategic development of the GIAC; 1 the Secretariat responsible for daily operation of the GIAC and administering of the disputes; the Arbitration Council body taking decisions related to specific matters strictly determined by the GIAC Arbitration Rules and GIAC Charter. 2 The GIAC Arbitration Rules - Several members of the Formation Working Group also worked on the first version of the Arbitration Rules of GIAC. While preparing the first draft of GIAC Arbitration Rules, the following arbitration institutions and their arbitration rules were taken in to consideration: ICC International Court of Arbitration, Arbitration Institution of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce, Netherlands Arbitration Institute, Vienna International Arbitration Centre, and Singapore International Arbitration Centre. The Commission for Final Revision of the GIAC Arbitration Rules was created by the recommendation of the experts involved in the formation process of the Georgian International Arbitration Centre and its final composition was approved on 25 April 2014. The members of this Commission were internationally renowned and recognized arbitration experts and practitioners. 1 The members of the GIAC Board: Kakha Biandurashvili (Chairman); Eka Gigauri, Zviad Kordzadze (Deputy Chairman), Jemal Inaishvili, Eprem Urumashvili and the Honorary member of the GIAC Board Dr. Yas Banifatemi. 2 The Members of the GIAC Arbitration Council Irakli Kordzakhia (Chairman), Nicola Mariani (Deputy Chairman), Tea Megeneishvili (Deputy Chairperson), Eva Kalnina, Maria Kostytska, Sophie Tkemaladze, Pierre Tercier. 2014 2

This ensures that the GIAC Arbitration Rules are drafted based on the modern standards and best arbitration practices, and signals its reliability and recognition. The working version of the Arbitration Rules organized several working sessions during the summer of 2014 and prepared the final draft of the revised GIAC Arbitration Rules. The GIAC Arbitration Rules were adopted by the GIAC Board in September 2014. ADVANTAGES OF GIAC The main function of GIAC is to administer the arbitration proceedings. Additionally, it aims to develop and popularize the alternative dispute resolution mechanisms in Georgia and in entire region as Georgia has a great potential to become the suitable arbitration forum in the whole region: Georgian legal system is modern and arbitration-friendly with its Law on Arbitration based on the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration; Georgia is the member of the 1958 New York Convention on Recognition and Enforcement of the Foreign Arbitral Awards; Georgian legislation permits parties freedom of choice of counsel and arbitrators; Georgia has open economy, low level of corruption and pro-business environment; Georgia is best located in the region on the crossroads of Europe and Asia; Georgian legislation permits foreign residents to carry out arbitration without work permits or additional formal requirements; Georgia is a low cost environment, hotels and restaurants prices are, on an average, substantially lower than in other European countries; The Arbitration Rules of GIAC has no analogue in Georgia. GIAC Rules combine recent developments and well-tried provisions in order to create a modern set of rules reflecting the needs of the parties. In addition to the flexible arbitration rules, GIAC provides the necessary facilities for dispute settlement, such as meeting rooms for arbitration hearings, party negotiations, arbitrators deliberations, mediation proceedings, etc. and assistance with further logistical organization, e.g. identifying and obtaining court reporters, administrative secretaries or interpreters. 2014 3

GIAC arbitration Rules are tailor made the parties needs - The GIAC Rules were drafted with the help of the international experts and arbitration practitioners. The international involvement in the drafting process guarantee that the rules meet all international criteria and represent the modern accepted standards. The GIAC Arbitration Rules allow full scale party autonomy within permissible legal framework. The conduct of proceedings may be determined by the parties and the tribunal. The parties can choose the language of the proceedings, the seat of arbitration and the applicable substantive law. All arbitrators, appointed by the Parties or by the GIAC Arbitration Council, are required to submit a statement of independence ( disclosure ) to the parties, to their counsels, and GIAC Secretariat. A full respect of arbitrators independence is the very first step to grant a correct conduct of the proceedings. In this respect, the GIAC is committed to constantly monitor the independence and impartiality of the arbitrators. GIAC will appoint arbitrators if no agreement can be reached by the parties, thus ensuring that the time efficiency of the proceedings. The GIAC Rules allow for the joinder of third parties and consolidation of proceedings in a flexible manner, which is novelty in Georgia. In order to enhance the enforceability of the award, the GIAC Arbitral Council scrutinizes the award and approves it. GIAC arbitration is cost effective - Costs for arbitrators and administrative services are significantly lower in comparison to other arbitration institutions, as well as litigation. Additionally, The GIAC fee schedule allows for a predictable cost calculation. It should be mentioned, that GIAC facilities for dispute settlement are free for the parties, which also serves to reduce the costs associated with the dispute resolution. Close cooperation with leading international organizations and experts - Many internationally renowned experts participated in the GIAC formation process. GIAC continues to cooperate with the internationally recognized experts, arbitration institutions and law firms. Additionally, GIAC runs the arbitration list, which is constantly updated. Currently, GIAC arbitration list includes Arbitrators from leading international law firms of London, Paris, Vienna, Geneva, Dubai, Warsaw, Moscow, Budapest, Belgrade etc. In addition, negotiations are underway for the addition of the new arbitrators on the list. The parties may choose the arbitrator from the list, who will be maximally adapted to the specific of their dispute. Partner organizations and law firms: Transparency International Georgia; 2014 4

Georgian Association of Arbitrators; Permanent Court of Arbitration in the Hague; Georgian Law Firms Association; Arbitration Initiative Georgia; White & Case; Dechert LLP; E&A Law Limited; Shearman & Sterling LLP; Lévy Kaufmann- Kohler. It should be also mentioned, that GIAC will be featured in Guide to Regional Arbitration 2015. Global Arbitration Review (GAR) is nowadays recognized as the leading resource on international arbitration news and community intelligence. 2014 5