Projective Lattices. with applications to isotope maps and databases. Ralph Freese CLA La Rochelle

Similar documents
General Lattice Theory: 1979 Problem Update

Theorem 1.3. Every finite lattice has a congruence-preserving embedding to a finite atomistic lattice.

The finite lattice representation problem and intervals in subgroup lattices of finite groups

INFLATION OF FINITE LATTICES ALONG ALL-OR-NOTHING SETS TRISTAN HOLMES J. B. NATION

COLLOQUIA MATHEMATICA SOCIETATIS JANOS BOLYAI SZEGED (HUNGARY), 1980.

Modular and Distributive Lattices

Introduction to Priestley duality 1 / 24

COMBINATORICS OF REDUCTIONS BETWEEN EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS

INTERVAL DISMANTLABLE LATTICES

CATEGORICAL SKEW LATTICES

Congruence lattices of finite intransitive group acts

New tools of set-theoretic homological algebra and their applications to modules

THE NUMBER OF UNARY CLONES CONTAINING THE PERMUTATIONS ON AN INFINITE SET

LATTICE EFFECT ALGEBRAS DENSELY EMBEDDABLE INTO COMPLETE ONES

An orderly algorithm to enumerate finite (semi)modular lattices

Lattices with many congruences are planar

Generating all modular lattices of a given size

CONSTRUCTION OF CODES BY LATTICE VALUED FUZZY SETS. 1. Introduction. Novi Sad J. Math. Vol. 35, No. 2, 2005,

LATTICE LAWS FORCING DISTRIBUTIVITY UNDER UNIQUE COMPLEMENTATION

Interpolation of κ-compactness and PCF

Laurence Boxer and Ismet KARACA

Gödel algebras free over finite distributive lattices

Fuzzy L-Quotient Ideals

arxiv: v1 [math.lo] 24 Feb 2014

Generating all nite modular lattices of a given size

V. Fields and Galois Theory

Transcendental lattices of complex algebraic surfaces

CTL Model Checking. Goal Method for proving M sat σ, where M is a Kripke structure and σ is a CTL formula. Approach Model checking!

Lattice Laws Forcing Distributivity Under Unique Complementation

CONGRUENCES AND IDEALS IN A DISTRIBUTIVE LATTICE WITH RESPECT TO A DERIVATION

PURITY IN IDEAL LATTICES. Abstract.

Continuous images of closed sets in generalized Baire spaces ESI Workshop: Forcing and Large Cardinals

ON THE LATTICE OF ORTHOMODULAR LOGICS

Laurence Boxer and Ismet KARACA

On axiomatisablity questions about monoid acts

Residuated Lattices of Size 12 extended version

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.lo] 15 Jan 1991

Local monotonicities and lattice derivatives of Boolean and pseudo-boolean functions

FINITE SUBSTRUCTURE LATTICES OF MODELS OF PEANO ARITHMETIC

RUDIN-KEISLER POSETS OF COMPLETE BOOLEAN ALGEBRAS

ALGORITHMS FOR FINITE, FINITELY PRESENTED AND FREE LATTICES

The (λ, κ)-fn and the order theory of bases in boolean algebras

Sy D. Friedman. August 28, 2001

Epimorphisms and Ideals of Distributive Nearlattices

Axiomatization of generic extensions by homogeneous partial orderings

Weak compactness in Banach lattices

Wada s Representations of the. Pure Braid Group of High Degree

LARGE CARDINALS AND L-LIKE UNIVERSES

Set- theore(c methods in model theory

Existentially closed models of the theory of differential fields with a cyclic automorphism

Lattices and the Knaster-Tarski Theorem

The Outer Model Programme

3 The Model Existence Theorem

Skew lattices of matrices in rings

The illustrated zoo of order-preserving functions

PERFECT TREE FORCINGS FOR SINGULAR CARDINALS

LATTICE VARIETIES COVERING THE SMALLEST NON-MODULAR VARIETY

UPWARD STABILITY TRANSFER FOR TAME ABSTRACT ELEMENTARY CLASSES

A Property Equivalent to n-permutability for Infinite Groups

2. The ultrapower construction

Building Infinite Processes from Regular Conditional Probability Distributions

Some Remarks on Finitely Quasi-injective Modules

Notes on the symmetric group

Generalization by Collapse

METRIC POSTULATES FOR MODULAR, DISTRIBUTIVE, AND BOOLEAN LATTICES

PARTITIONS OF 2 ω AND COMPLETELY ULTRAMETRIZABLE SPACES

Hyperidentities in (xx)y xy Graph Algebras of Type (2,0)

Chair of Communications Theory, Prof. Dr.-Ing. E. Jorswieck. Übung 5: Supermodular Games

Yao s Minimax Principle

UNIVERSAL QUASIVARIETIES OF ALGEBRAS

ADDING A LOT OF COHEN REALS BY ADDING A FEW II. 1. Introduction

Abstract Algebra Solution of Assignment-1

Collinear Triple Hypergraphs and the Finite Plane Kakeya Problem

CARDINALITIES OF RESIDUE FIELDS OF NOETHERIAN INTEGRAL DOMAINS

maps 1 to 5. Similarly, we compute (1 2)(4 7 8)(2 1)( ) = (1 5 8)(2 4 7).

CONGRUENCE LATTICES OF PLANAR LATTICES

REMARKS ON K3 SURFACES WITH NON-SYMPLECTIC AUTOMORPHISMS OF ORDER 7

A relation on 132-avoiding permutation patterns

ON THE QUOTIENT SHAPES OF VECTORIAL SPACES. Nikica Uglešić

MITCHELL S THEOREM REVISITED. Contents

GUESSING MODELS IMPLY THE SINGULAR CARDINAL HYPOTHESIS arxiv: v1 [math.lo] 25 Mar 2019

AN INFINITE CARDINAL-VALUED KRULL DIMENSION FOR RINGS

Level by Level Inequivalence, Strong Compactness, and GCH

Chain conditions, layered partial orders and weak compactness

κ-bounded Exponential-Logarithmic Power Series Fields

A.Miller Model Theory M776 May 7, Spring 2009 Homework problems are due in class one week from the day assigned (which is in parentheses).

Notes to The Resurrection Axioms

ORDERED SEMIGROUPS HAVING THE P -PROPERTY. Niovi Kehayopulu, Michael Tsingelis

Translates of (Anti) Fuzzy Submodules

LIST OF PUBLICATIONS. 1. Published Mathematical Papers

Orthogonality to the value group is the same as generic stability in C-minimal expansions of ACVF

Ordered Semigroups in which the Left Ideals are Intra-Regular Semigroups

STRONGLY UNFOLDABLE CARDINALS MADE INDESTRUCTIBLE

0.1 Equivalence between Natural Deduction and Axiomatic Systems

On almost precipitous ideals.

Algebra homework 8 Homomorphisms, isomorphisms

Characterizing large cardinals in terms of layered partial orders

Double Ore Extensions versus Iterated Ore Extensions

KAPLANSKY'S PROBLEM ON VALUATION RINGS

FUZZY PRIME L-FILTERS

Transcription:

Projective Lattices with applications to isotope maps and databases Ralph Freese CLA 2013. La Rochelle Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 1 / 17

Projective Lattices A lattice L is projective in a variety V of lattices if whenever f : K L is an epimorphism, there is a homomorphism g : L K such that f (g(a)) = a for all a L. Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 2 / 17

Projective Lattices A lattice L is projective in a variety V of lattices if whenever f : K L is an epimorphism, there is a homomorphism g : L K such that f (g(a)) = a for all a L. Note g is one-to-one and ρ = gf : K K is a retraction of K: ρ is an endomorphism of K and ρ 2 = ρ. Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 2 / 17

Projective Lattices A lattice L is projective in a variety V of lattices if whenever f : K L is an epimorphism, there is a homomorphism g : L K such that f (g(a)) = a for all a L. Note g is one-to-one and ρ = gf : K K is a retraction of K: ρ is an endomorphism of K and ρ 2 = ρ. The sublattice ρ(k) = g(l) of K is isomorphic to L. g(l) is a retract of K. In a slight abuse of terminology, we will also say L is a retract of K. A lattice is projective in V if and only if it a retract of a free lattice F V (X) in V. Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 2 / 17

Projective Lattices Theorem (1978) A lattice L is projective (in the class of all lattices) iff L satisfies Whitman s condition (W), L = D(L) = D d (L), L has the minimal join cover refinement property and its dual, and L is finitely separable. Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 3 / 17

Isotone Sections Let f : K L be an epimorphism. An isotone (order preserving) map g : L K is an isotone section if f (g(a)) = a for a L. Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 4 / 17

Isotone Sections Let f : K L be an epimorphism. An isotone (order preserving) map g : L K is an isotone section if f (g(a)) = a for a L. For which L is there an epimorphism f : FL(X) L with an isotone section? Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 4 / 17

Isotone Sections Let f : K L be an epimorphism. An isotone (order preserving) map g : L K is an isotone section if f (g(a)) = a for a L. For which L is there an epimorphism f : FL(X) L with an isotone section? For which L does every epimorphism f : K L have an isotone section? Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 4 / 17

Isotone Sections Let f : K L be an epimorphism. An isotone (order preserving) map g : L K is an isotone section if f (g(a)) = a for a L. For which L is there an epimorphism f : FL(X) L with an isotone section? For which L does every epimorphism f : K L have an isotone section? Which ordered sets P can be embedded into FL(X) for some X? Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 4 / 17

Isotone Sections Let f : K L be an epimorphism. An isotone (order preserving) map g : L K is an isotone section if f (g(a)) = a for a L. For which L is there an epimorphism f : FL(X) L with an isotone section? For which L does every epimorphism f : K L have an isotone section? Which ordered sets P can be embedded into FL(X) for some X? Yes to all 3 if L (or P) is countable. Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 4 / 17

A Theorem of Galvin and Jónsson Theorem Relatively free lattices are countable unions of antichains. So no free lattice contain an uncountable chain. Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 5 / 17

A Theorem of Galvin and Jónsson Theorem Relatively free lattices are countable unions of antichains. So no free lattice contain an uncountable chain. Proof outline: Let G be the group of automorphisms of F V (X) induced from permutations of X that move only finitely many letters. Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 5 / 17

A Theorem of Galvin and Jónsson Theorem Relatively free lattices are countable unions of antichains. So no free lattice contain an uncountable chain. Proof outline: Let G be the group of automorphisms of F V (X) induced from permutations of X that move only finitely many letters. G has only only countable many orbits. Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 5 / 17

A Theorem of Galvin and Jónsson Theorem Relatively free lattices are countable unions of antichains. So no free lattice contain an uncountable chain. Proof outline: Let G be the group of automorphisms of F V (X) induced from permutations of X that move only finitely many letters. G has only only countable many orbits. Each orbit is an antichain. Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 5 / 17

A Theorem of Galvin and Jónsson Theorem Relatively free lattices are countable unions of antichains. So no free lattice contain an uncountable chain. Proof outline: Let G be the group of automorphisms of F V (X) induced from permutations of X that move only finitely many letters. G has only only countable many orbits. Each orbit is an antichain. If a < σ(a), then applying σ Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 5 / 17

A Theorem of Galvin and Jónsson Theorem Relatively free lattices are countable unions of antichains. So no free lattice contain an uncountable chain. Proof outline: Let G be the group of automorphisms of F V (X) induced from permutations of X that move only finitely many letters. G has only only countable many orbits. Each orbit is an antichain. If a < σ(a), then applying σ a < σ(a) < σ 2 (a) < < σ k (a) = a, Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 5 / 17

A Theorem of Galvin and Jónsson Theorem Relatively free lattices are countable unions of antichains. So no free lattice contain an uncountable chain. Proof outline: Let G be the group of automorphisms of F V (X) induced from permutations of X that move only finitely many letters. G has only only countable many orbits. Each orbit is an antichain. If a < σ(a), then applying σ a < σ(a) < σ 2 (a) < < σ k (a) = a, where k is the order of σ. Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 5 / 17

A Theorem of Galvin and Jónsson Theorem Relatively free lattices are countable unions of antichains. So no free lattice contain an uncountable chain. Proof outline: Let G be the group of automorphisms of F V (X) induced from permutations of X that move only finitely many letters. G has only only countable many orbits. Each orbit is an antichain. If a < σ(a), then applying σ a < σ(a) < σ 2 (a) < < σ k (a) = a, where k is the order of σ. This theorem is also true for free Boolean algebras. Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 5 / 17

Finite Separability L is finitely separable if for each a L there are finite sets A(a) {x L : x a} and B(a) {x L : x a} such that a b = A(a) B(b) Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 6 / 17

Finite Separability L is finitely separable if for each a L there are finite sets A(a) {x L : x a} and B(a) {x L : x a} such that (A for above and B for below.) a b = A(a) B(b) Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 6 / 17

Finite Separability L is finitely separable if for each a L there are finite sets A(a) {x L : x a} and B(a) {x L : x a} such that (A for above and B for below.) a b = A(a) B(b) Every countable lattice is finitely separable. Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 6 / 17

Finite Separability and Isotone Sections Theorem TFAE for a lattice L L is finitely separable. Every epimorphism K L has an isotone section. An epimorphism f : FL(X) L exists with an isotone section. Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 7 / 17

An Interpolation Result w F V (X). There is a smallest subset var(w) of X with w in the sublattice generated by var(w). Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 8 / 17

An Interpolation Result w F V (X). There is a smallest subset var(w) of X with w in the sublattice generated by var(w). Theorem If w u in F V (X), there is a v with w v u such that var(v) var(w) var(u) and r(v) min(r(w), r(u)). Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 8 / 17

An Interpolation Result w F V (X). There is a smallest subset var(w) of X with w in the sublattice generated by var(w). Theorem If w u in F V (X), there is a v with w v u such that var(v) var(w) var(u) and r(v) min(r(w), r(u)). Corollary If L is a projective lattice in V then L is finitely separable. Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 8 / 17

An Interpolation Result Corollary If L is a projective lattice in V then L is finitely separable. Proof. Finite separability is clearly preserved by retracts; thus it suffices to prove this theorem for L = F V (X). For a L, let A(a) = {w F V (X) : w a, var(w) var(a), and r(w) r(a)} and define B(a) dually. The result follows from the interpolation theorem. Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 9 / 17

Projective Ordinal Sums Theorem Let V be a variety of lattices and let L = L 0 L 1, where L i V for i = 0, 1. Then L is projective in V if and only if both L 0 and L 1 are and one of the following hold: 1 L 0 has a greatest element. 2 L 1 has a least element. 3 L 0 has a countable cofinal chain and L 1 has a countable coinitial chain. Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 10 / 17

Projective Ordinal Sums Corollary F V (X) F V (Y ) is projective in V iff X is finite, Y is finite, or both X and Y are countable. Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 11 / 17

F V (P) for P a partially ordered set Theorem If P is a partially ordered set, then F V (P) (the V lattice freely generated by P subject to the order relations of P) is projective in V if and only if P is finitely separable. Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 12 / 17

F V (P) for P a partially ordered set Theorem If P is a partially ordered set, then F V (P) (the V lattice freely generated by P subject to the order relations of P) is projective in V if and only if P is finitely separable. Example: P consists of two uncountable antichains A 0 and A 1 with x 0 < x 1 for x 0 A 0 and x 1 A 1. Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 12 / 17

F V (P) for P a partially ordered set Theorem If P is a partially ordered set, then F V (P) (the V lattice freely generated by P subject to the order relations of P) is projective in V if and only if P is finitely separable. Example: P consists of two uncountable antichains A 0 and A 1 with x 0 < x 1 for x 0 A 0 and x 1 A 1. F V (P) = F V (A 0 ) F V (A 1 ) is not projective. Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 12 / 17

F V (P) for P a partially ordered set Theorem If P is a partially ordered set, then F V (P) (the V lattice freely generated by P subject to the order relations of P) is projective in V if and only if P is finitely separable. Example: P consists of two uncountable antichains A 0 and A 1 with x 0 < x 1 for x 0 A 0 and x 1 A 1. F V (P) = F V (A 0 ) F V (A 1 ) is not projective. Let Q = P {r} with x 0 < r < x 1. Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 12 / 17

F V (P) for P a partially ordered set Theorem If P is a partially ordered set, then F V (P) (the V lattice freely generated by P subject to the order relations of P) is projective in V if and only if P is finitely separable. Example: P consists of two uncountable antichains A 0 and A 1 with x 0 < x 1 for x 0 A 0 and x 1 A 1. F V (P) = F V (A 0 ) F V (A 1 ) is not projective. Let Q = P {r} with x 0 < r < x 1. Then F V (Q) = F V (A 0 ) 1 F V (A 1 ) is projective. Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 12 / 17

F V (P) for P a partially ordered set Theorem If P is a partially ordered set, then F V (P) (the V lattice freely generated by P subject to the order relations of P) is projective in V if and only if P is finitely separable. Example: P consists of two uncountable antichains A 0 and A 1 with x 0 < x 1 for x 0 A 0 and x 1 A 1. F V (P) = F V (A 0 ) F V (A 1 ) is not projective. Let Q = P {r} with x 0 < r < x 1. Then F V (Q) = F V (A 0 ) 1 F V (A 1 ) is projective. So Q, and hence P, is embeddable into a free V lattice. Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 12 / 17

Another Example P be the induced ordered set of atoms and coatrooms of the lattice of subsets of a uncountable set. Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 13 / 17

Another Example P be the induced ordered set of atoms and coatrooms of the lattice of subsets of a uncountable set. P cannot be embedded into any (relatively) free lattice. Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 13 / 17

Another Example P be the induced ordered set of atoms and coatrooms of the lattice of subsets of a uncountable set. P cannot be embedded into any (relatively) free lattice. Proof: like Galvin-Jónsson, Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 13 / 17

Another Example P be the induced ordered set of atoms and coatrooms of the lattice of subsets of a uncountable set. P cannot be embedded into any (relatively) free lattice. Proof: like Galvin-Jónsson, but harder. Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 13 / 17

The (join) dependency relation D For join irreducibles a b, a depends on b a D b p with a b p and a c p for c < b. Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 14 / 17

The (join) dependency relation D For join irreducibles a b, a depends on b a D b p with a b p and a c p for c < b. Assume L is finite. Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 14 / 17

The (join) dependency relation D For join irreducibles a b, a depends on b a D b p with a b p and a c p for c < b. Assume L is finite. (T refines S) For S, T L: T S if for all t T, there exists s S with t s. Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 14 / 17

The (join) dependency relation D For join irreducibles a b, a depends on b a D b p with a b p and a c p for c < b. Assume L is finite. (T refines S) For S, T L: T S if for all t T, there exists s S with t s. S is a minimal join cover of a if a S and if a T and T S, then S T. Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 14 / 17

The (join) dependency relation D For join irreducibles a b, a depends on b a D b p with a b p and a c p for c < b. Assume L is finite. (T refines S) For S, T L: T S if for all t T, there exists s S with t s. S is a minimal join cover of a if a S and if a T and T S, then S T. a D b iff b belongs to a minimal nontrivial join cover of a. Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 14 / 17

The (join) dependency relation D For join irreducibles a b, a depends on b a D b p with a b p and a c p for c < b. Assume L is finite. (T refines S) For S, T L: T S if for all t T, there exists s S with t s. S is a minimal join cover of a if a S and if a T and T S, then S T. a D b iff b belongs to a minimal nontrivial join cover of a. D(L) = L if the D relation is acyclic. Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 14 / 17

Applications of the dependency relation D These notions played a role in the study of Free lattices Projective lattices Finitely presented lattices Bounded homormorphisms Transferable lattices Congruence lattices of lattices Representation of finite lattices as congruence lattices of finite algebras (Pudlák and Tůma). Ordered direct bases in database theory. Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 15 / 17

The dependency relation in databases This is the work of K. Adaricheva, J. B. Nation, R. Rand, "Ordered direct implicational basis of a finite closure system." Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 16 / 17

The dependency relation in databases This is the work of K. Adaricheva, J. B. Nation, R. Rand, "Ordered direct implicational basis of a finite closure system." Let S, φ be a reduced closure system. (φ(x) = φ(y) = x = y) Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 16 / 17

The dependency relation in databases This is the work of K. Adaricheva, J. B. Nation, R. Rand, "Ordered direct implicational basis of a finite closure system." Let S, φ be a reduced closure system. (φ(x) = φ(y) = x = y) X Y if x X implies there is y Y with x φ(y). Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 16 / 17

The dependency relation in databases This is the work of K. Adaricheva, J. B. Nation, R. Rand, "Ordered direct implicational basis of a finite closure system." Let S, φ be a reduced closure system. (φ(x) = φ(y) = x = y) X Y if x X implies there is y Y with x φ(y). x Y (Y covers x): x φ(y ) and x φ(y) for all y Y. Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 16 / 17

The dependency relation in databases This is the work of K. Adaricheva, J. B. Nation, R. Rand, "Ordered direct implicational basis of a finite closure system." Let S, φ be a reduced closure system. (φ(x) = φ(y) = x = y) X Y if x X implies there is y Y with x φ(y). x Y (Y covers x): x φ(y ) and x φ(y) for all y Y. Y a minimal cover of x: if x Z, Z Y then Y Z. Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 16 / 17

The dependency relation in databases This is the work of K. Adaricheva, J. B. Nation, R. Rand, "Ordered direct implicational basis of a finite closure system." Let S, φ be a reduced closure system. (φ(x) = φ(y) = x = y) X Y if x X implies there is y Y with x φ(y). x Y (Y covers x): x φ(y ) and x φ(y) for all y Y. Y a minimal cover of x: if x Z, Z Y then Y Z. The D-basis of S, φ, Σ D, is the union of {y x : y x φ(y)} and (1) {X x : X a miminal cover of x}. (2) Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 16 / 17

The dependency relation in databases This is the work of K. Adaricheva, J. B. Nation, R. Rand, "Ordered direct implicational basis of a finite closure system." Let S, φ be a reduced closure system. (φ(x) = φ(y) = x = y) X Y if x X implies there is y Y with x φ(y). x Y (Y covers x): x φ(y ) and x φ(y) for all y Y. Y a minimal cover of x: if x Z, Z Y then Y Z. The D-basis of S, φ, Σ D, is the union of {y x : y x φ(y)} and (1) {X x : X a miminal cover of x}. (2) Ordered D-basis is an ordering of Σ D with (1) before (2). Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 16 / 17

The dependency relation in databases The D-basis of S, φ, Σ D, is the union of {y x : y x φ(y)} and (1) {X x : X a miminal cover of x}. (2) Ordered D-basis is an ordering of Σ D with (1) before (2). Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 17 / 17

The dependency relation in databases The D-basis of S, φ, Σ D, is the union of {y x : y x φ(y)} and (1) {X x : X a miminal cover of x}. (2) Ordered D-basis is an ordering of Σ D with (1) before (2). If Σ D is ordered {s 1, s 2,..., s n }, then φ(x) = X n where X 0 = X and s k+1 = A b Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 17 / 17

The dependency relation in databases The D-basis of S, φ, Σ D, is the union of {y x : y x φ(y)} and (1) {X x : X a miminal cover of x}. (2) Ordered D-basis is an ordering of Σ D with (1) before (2). If Σ D is ordered {s 1, s 2,..., s n }, then φ(x) = X n where X 0 = X and s k+1 = A b { X k {b} if A X k X k+1 = otherwise X k Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 17 / 17

The dependency relation in databases The D-basis of S, φ, Σ D, is the union of {y x : y x φ(y)} and (1) {X x : X a miminal cover of x}. (2) Ordered D-basis is an ordering of Σ D with (1) before (2). If Σ D is ordered {s 1, s 2,..., s n }, then φ(x) = X n where X 0 = X and s k+1 = A b { X k {b} if A X k X k+1 = otherwise X k So only one pass through Σ D is needed to fine the closure. Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 17 / 17

K. Adaricheva, J.B. Nation, and R. Rand. Ordered direct implicational basis of a finite closure system. Discrete Applied Math., 161:707 723, 2013. K. Bertet and B. Monjardet. The multiple facets of the canonical direct unit implicational basis. Theoret. Comput. Sci., 411(22-24):2155 2166, 2010. Ralph Freese and J. B. Nation. Projective lattices. Pacific J. Math., 75:93 106, 1978. P. Pudlák and J. Tuma. Yeast graphs and fermentation of algebraic lattices. In Lattice theory, pages 301 341. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1976. Proceedings of the Colloquium held in Szeged,1974. Colloquia Mathematica Societatis János Bolyai, vol. 14. Ralph Freese () Projective Lattices Oct 2013 17 / 17