Portfolio Models and ABS

Similar documents
Risk Modeling and Bank Steering

Final Test Credit Risk. École Nationale des Ponts et Chausées Département Ingénieurie Mathématique et Informatique Master II

Credit Risk. Lecture 5 Risk Modeling and Bank Steering. Loïc BRIN

Analytical Pricing of CDOs in a Multi-factor Setting. Setting by a Moment Matching Approach

Dependence Modeling and Credit Risk

Vasicek Model Copulas CDO and CSO Other products. Credit Risk. Lecture 4 Portfolio models and Asset Backed Securities (ABS) Loïc BRIN

P2.T6. Credit Risk Measurement & Management. Malz, Financial Risk Management: Models, History & Institutions

Credit Ratings and Securitization

The Vasicek Distribution

Section 1. Long Term Risk

Economi Capital. Tiziano Bellini. Università di Bologna. November 29, 2013

Credit Risk in Banking

Dependence Modeling and Credit Risk


Research Paper. Capital for Structured Products. Date:2004 Reference Number:4/2

GRANULARITY ADJUSTMENT FOR DYNAMIC MULTIPLE FACTOR MODELS : SYSTEMATIC VS UNSYSTEMATIC RISKS

The role of banks in the economy

Financial Services Alert

Maturity as a factor for credit risk capital

Financial Risk Management

Financial Risk Management

Credit VaR: Pillar II Adjustments

Firm Heterogeneity and Credit Risk Diversification

Lecture notes on risk management, public policy, and the financial system. Credit portfolios. Allan M. Malz. Columbia University

Valuation of Forward Starting CDOs

Pricing & Risk Management of Synthetic CDOs

Basel II Pillar 3 disclosures 6M 09

A Generic One-Factor Lévy Model for Pricing Synthetic CDOs

Credit Portfolio Risk

Unexpected Recovery Risk and LGD Discount Rate Determination #

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Second Working Paper on Securitisation. Issued for comment by 20 December 2002

ECE 340 Probabilistic Methods in Engineering M/W 3-4:15. Lecture 10: Continuous RV Families. Prof. Vince Calhoun

CREDIT RATINGS. Rating Agencies: Moody s and S&P Creditworthiness of corporate bonds

Structural Models in Credit Valuation: The KMV experience. Oldrich Alfons Vasicek NYU Stern, November 2012

Effective Computation & Allocation of Enterprise Credit Capital for Large Retail and SME portfolios

Recent developments in. Portfolio Modelling

In various tables, use of - indicates not meaningful or not applicable.

Online appendices from The xva Challenge by Jon Gregory. APPENDIX 8A: LHP approximation and IRB formula

Quantifying credit risk in a corporate bond

Chapter 4 Continuous Random Variables and Probability Distributions

Optimal Stochastic Recovery for Base Correlation

MANAGEMENT OF RETAIL ASSETS IN BANKING: COMPARISION OF INTERNAL MODEL OVER BASEL

Stress testing of credit portfolios in light- and heavy-tailed models

Dr. Maddah ENMG 625 Financial Eng g II 10/16/06

Systematic Risk in Homogeneous Credit Portfolios

Research Paper. How Risky are Structured Exposures Compared to Corporate Bonds? Evidence from Bond and ABS Returns. Date:2004 Reference Number:4/1

Alexander Marianski August IFRS 9: Probably Weighted and Biased?

In various tables, use of indicates not meaningful or not applicable.

Normal Distribution. Notes. Normal Distribution. Standard Normal. Sums of Normal Random Variables. Normal. approximation of Binomial.

Dealing with seller s risk

Dynamic Factor Copula Model

Applications of CDO Modeling Techniques in Credit Portfolio Management

Chapter 4 Continuous Random Variables and Probability Distributions

Basel II Pillar 3 disclosures

Synthetic CDO pricing using the double normal inverse Gaussian copula with stochastic factor loadings

Overview of the Basel Committee s Second Working Paper on Securitization. Jose A. Lopez.

Midas Margin Model SIX x-clear Ltd

An Approximation for Credit Portfolio Losses

The University of Chicago, Booth School of Business Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2012, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Solutions to Final Exam

Lecture Stat 302 Introduction to Probability - Slides 15

UQ, STAT2201, 2017, Lectures 3 and 4 Unit 3 Probability Distributions.

2 Modeling Credit Risk

Information Processing and Limited Liability

Sampling Distribution

Linking Stress Testing and Portfolio Credit Risk. Nihil Patel, Senior Director

Pricing Default Events: Surprise, Exogeneity and Contagion

1. Covariance between two variables X and Y is denoted by Cov(X, Y) and defined by. Cov(X, Y ) = E(X E(X))(Y E(Y ))

Statistics 431 Spring 2007 P. Shaman. Preliminaries

Risk Measurement in Credit Portfolio Models

Data Collection Residential Belgian Real Estate - Guidelines (Update July 2016)

VALUE-ADDING ACTIVE CREDIT PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT

Slides for Risk Management Credit Risk

MATH3075/3975 FINANCIAL MATHEMATICS TUTORIAL PROBLEMS

Statistical Methods in Financial Risk Management

Applications of GCorr Macro within the RiskFrontier Software: Stress Testing, Reverse Stress Testing, and Risk Integration

Credit risk of a loan portfolio (Credit Value at Risk)

Value at Risk Ch.12. PAK Study Manual

1.1 Interest rates Time value of money

Statistical Tables Compiled by Alan J. Terry

Measuring Risk. Review of statistical concepts Probability distribution. Review of statistical concepts Probability distribution 2/1/2018

QUANTITATIVE IMPACT STUDY NO. 3 CREDIT RISK - INSTRUCTIONS

Valuation and Tax Policy

Course information FN3142 Quantitative finance

Financial Engineering and Structured Products

Financial Econometrics Jeffrey R. Russell. Midterm 2014 Suggested Solutions. TA: B. B. Deng

Basel III Pillar 3 disclosures 2014

No-arbitrage and the decay of market impact and rough volatility: a theory inspired by Jim

Basel II Second Pillar: an Analytical VaR with Contagion and Sectorial Risks

Random Variables and Probability Functions

Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures Report. For the Quarterly Period Ended December 31, 2015

Estimating Economic Capital for Private Equity Portfolios

Capital Allocation Principles

Term structures of default probabilities

Luis Seco University of Toronto

CPSC 540: Machine Learning

Comparison results for credit risk portfolios

Lecture 4: Return vs Risk: Mean-Variance Analysis

RISK MANAGEMENT IS IT NECESSARY?

Advanced Tools for Risk Management and Asset Pricing

Transcription:

Tutorial 4 Portfolio Models and ABS Loïc BRI François CREI Tutorial 4 Portfolio Models and ABS École ationale des Ponts et Chausées Département Ingénieurie Mathématique et Informatique Master II Loïc BRI François CREI Exercice 1: From granular homogeneous portfolio to non-homogeneous portfolio. First, we consider a granular homogeneous pool, with internal risk parameters : PD = (s), and for the correlation. 1. Compute the mean and the standard deviation of losses on the portfolio (Hint: consider a finite number,, of assets first and then generalize). Let us consider assets, with the same nominal 1/ and maturity, which default occur when D i = Ri <s where s is the common threshold and R i a normal variable equal to: R i = F + 1 ε i, where F and ε i are independent. Let L be the loss of this portfolio. We have: L = Ri s We know that R i are standard normal variables: By taking the limit we deduce that: (L ) = ( Ri <s) = (R i < s) Φ(s) = Φ(s) (L) = lim Φ(s) = Φ(s) EPC Département IMI Master II 1

Loïc BRI François CREI Tutorial 4 Portfolio Models and ABS (L 2 ) is obtained as follow: (L 2 ) = 2 2 By taking the limit we deduce that: = 2 2 = 2 2 Ri <s 2 Ri <s + 2 ( Ri <s) + 2 0 i< j 0 i<j Ri <s R j <s Ri <s R j <s = 2 2 (R i < s) +2 R i < s, R j < s 0 i< j Φ(s) Φ 2 (s,s,) Φ(s) = 2 ( 1) + Φ 2 2 (s, s, ) (L 2 ) = lim 2 Φ(s) + 0 = 2 Φ 2 (s, s, ) Hence, we deduce the variance of the portfolio loss: ( 1) 2 } {{ } 1 Φ 2 (s, s, ) (L) = (L 2 ) (L) 2 2. For each α [0; 1], compute the α loss quantile. = 2 Φ 2 (s, s, ) Φ(s) 2 0, since 0 (1) We need to find x such as: (L x) = α First method: We have seen that: Thus: (L x) = L = Φ Φ s F 1 s F x 1 ) = F s 1 Φ 1 ( x 1 Φ 1 x s = Φ } {{ } portfolio loss cdf (2) (3) (4) 2 EPC Département IMI Master II

Tutorial 4 Portfolio Models and ABS Loïc BRI François CREI (3) to (4) comes from the fact that F is a symetrical variable (1 Φ(x) = Φ( x)). Therefore: (L x) = α 1 Φ 1 ( Φ x ) s s+ Φ x = Φ 1 (α) 1 = α We then have: q L (α) = Φ s + Φ 1 (α) 1 Second method: We can notice that L is decreasing with F which is the only stochastic term in (2) and since the quantile function of F is Φ 1,therefore: s Φ 1 (1 α) q L (α) = Φ 1 F is symetrical therefore Φ 1 (1 α) = Φ 1 (α) and: q L (α) = Φ s + Φ 1 (α) 1 3. For a given threshold l 0 <, compute [(L l 0 ) + ]. (L l 0 ) + = (L l 0 ) L>l0 = L L>l0 l0 L>l0 =(L>l 0 ) (5) We have: L L>l0 = = = L Φ s F 1 l 0 L F s 1 Φ 1 l 0 ) lim = lim = lim Ri <s F s 1 Φ 1 l 0 Ri <s F s 1 Φ 1 l0 s 1 Φ 1 l 0 Φ s,, s 1 Φ 1 l 0 = Φ s,, (6) EPC Département IMI Master II 3

Loïc BRI François CREI Tutorial 4 Portfolio Models and ABS From (5) and (7) we can conclude: (L l 0 ) + s 1 Φ 1 l 0 = Φ s,, l 0 Φ s 1 Φ 1 l 0 (7) 4. We now relax the homogeneiy assumption and consider that each asset has its own default probability asset i defaults as soon as its asset return R i = F + 1 ε i < s + σ ε i, where all random variables (F, (ε i ) i, ( ε i ) i ) are normal, centered, reduced, independent variables. Show that the loss distribution remains a Vasicek loss distribution, with modified parameters. Comment. s = s 1 + σ 2 = 1 + σ 2 R i < s + σ ε i F + 1 ε i < s + σ ε i 1 e i σ ε i < s F 1 ei σ ε i < s F 1 + σ 2 1 + σ 2 1 ei σ ε i 1 + σ 2 1 ei σ ε i 1 + σ 2 < < s F 1 + σ 21 1+σ 2 s 1+σ 2 1+σ F 2 1 1+σ 2 1 ei σ ε i 1 +σ 2 is Gaussian as the sum of two Gaussian variables. Moreover, it centered with a variance equal to 1. It is therefore a standard Gaussian variable. We can then conclude. We can see that = 1+σ <. Hence, adding a noise increases the idiosyncratic risk compared to the systemic 2 risk. oticing that Φ s, s, ) Φ(s ) 2 Φ s, s, ) Φ(s) 2 we can deduce from (1) that adding heterogeneity to the thresholds (or PDs) within the portfolio decreases the variance of the portfolio loss. The diversification is therefore increased. Exercice 2: Analysis of a securitization deal. You are working in a bank and want to compute the required regulatory capital of a securitization deal. The deal consists in the securitization of a portfolio of mortgage loans which have the same size and the same maturity (7 years). In this tutorial, we are going to use a simplified version of rating agencies methodologies. It consists in estimating for each loan a probability of default and an hypothesis in case of major changes in the market. These depend on the initial amount provided (1 - Loan To Value), the ratio Debt-to-Income, the geographical zone and data to assess a trend and volatility on the real estate market. The tranching of the deal is as follows: We will use the following parameters: Pobability of default for each borrower : 2 %; 4 EPC Département IMI Master II

Tutorial 4 Portfolio Models and ABS Loïc BRI François CREI Class Amount Owner A 900 Investors B 70 Investors C 30 Bank TOTAL 1000 Loan to value: 75 %; Market-Value-Decline: 30 %; Repossession costs: 10 %. 1. What is the SFA capital on the pool before securitization? In order to compute the SFA capital, we need several parameters: the Probability of Default (PD): 2 %; the Loss Given Default (): for a 100 mortgage loan, 30 would be lost for market value decline, 10 for repossession costs, so the recovered amound would be 60 for an exposure of 75 (Loan To Value of 75 %). That means that the is 15 75 = 20%. The SFA formula for mortgage exposure is: where: K = R is a correlation parameter; K is the capital; R = 0.15 1 1 R G(PD) + (x) denotes the normal cumulative distribution function; G(z) denotes the inverse cumulative distribution function. R 1 R G(0.999) PD 2. A rating is given by agency ratings under the following conditions: umber of time the expected loss is covered Rating 1 BB 2 BBB 3 A 4 AA 5 or more AAA What are the ratings of the different tranches? What can you say about the methodology? We first need to compute the one-year expected loss: (L 1 year ) = EAD PD = 1000 20% 2% = 4 We then have to determine the Total Expected Loss (i.e. on the full life of transaction). As we have no other information on the amortization profile, let us consider that: Total Loss = (L 1 year ) 7 years = 28 EPC Département IMI Master II 5

Loïc BRI François CREI Tutorial 4 Portfolio Models and ABS This is a conservation assumption. A BBB tranche should have 2 Total Loss as credit enhancement. 28 2 = 56 Credit Enhancement. That is, a BBB tranche should have a Hence, we deduce that the tranches are rated as follows: C: on rated; B: covers 1 Expected Loss and is therefore BB rated; A: has a credit enhancement equal to nearly 4 times Total Expected Loss. It is then rated AA. In practice, because of amortization profile, Average Maturity will be less than 7 years, that would lead to a better rating than the ones that have been computed here above. 3. Propose another model to rate the tranches, assuming that you know the probabilities of default of all the corporate ratings. What we could do, is to make an hypothesis on the correlation of the defaults of mortgages in the pool and use a Vasicek model (as we already know PD and ). On that basis, we would compute an expected loss (as a percentage) of each tranche that we could compare to the probabilities of all the corporate ratings in order to determine a grade. 4. Same question but assuming that there is an excess spread of 50 bp on the pool. Reminder about excess spread: its corresponds to a part of the interests that are not paid to tranches holders but set aside so that in case of default, the amount can cover part of the losses. It is a technique to enhance credit. The problem gets trickier as we have to simulate the default of the pool on a one-year horizon in order to take into account the flow of the excess spread and its consequent effect on the losses of tranche C, B and A. On that basis, we would compute a one-year default probability that would take this credit enhancement into account and compare it to the corporate ratings. 5. Knowing that the loans can be reimburse in advance, what is the effect on senior tranches? The effect on the quality on senior tranches is positive. Indeed, would half the portfolio be reimbursed, the structure of the portfolio would be the following: Class Amount Owner A 400 Investors B 70 Investors C 30 Bank TOTAL 500 That means that the credit enhancement generated by tranching the asset pool is ore protective for the senior tranche, in proportion, as tranche A and B represent 100 100 500 = 20% instead of 1000 = 10%. 6 EPC Département IMI Master II