CTJ Releases Analysis of McCain Tax Plan

Similar documents
The Effects of the Candidates Tax Plans on Households at Different Income Levels: Examples

New Analysis Finds GOP Tax Plan would Give Richest One Percent of CT Residents $125,380 More Per Year on Average than Obama s Approach

I S S U E B R I E F PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE PPI PRESIDENT BUSH S TAX PLAN: IMPACTS ON AGE AND INCOME GROUPS

Senator Kerry s Tax Proposals. Leonard E. Burman and Jeffrey Rohaly 1 Revised July 23, 2004

On Friday, October 12, less than six months

Middle Class Tax Relief Act of 2012

Federal Taxation of Earnings versus Investment Income in 2004

Would the Senate Democrats proposed excise tax on highcost employer-paid health insurance benefits be progressive?

DISCUSSING THE TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT THIS TAX SEASON

WILLMS, S.C. MEMORANDUM

President Obama s Fiscal Year 2010 Budget

UNIFIED FRAMEWORK FOR FIXING OUR BROKEN TAX CODE

Expiring Tax Provisions

Bush Still on Track to Borrow $10 Trillion by 2014 According to Latest Official Estimates

Brackets (seven) - Taxable Income Single Filers. Between $9,525 and $38,700. Between $2,550 and $9,150. Between $157,500 and $200,000

2011 Tax Guide. What You Need to Know About the New Rules

OVERVIEW OF TAX CHANGES IN THE JOBS AND GROWTH TAX RELIEF RECONCILIATION ACT OF 2003

Tax Law Snapshot for Individuals 2014 Filing Season

Options to Limit the Benefit of Tax Expenditures for High-Income Households

Bollenbacher and Associates Certified Public Accountants Taxpayer Relief Act

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017

The Distribution of Federal Taxes, Jeffrey Rohaly

(See the accompanying two-sided fact sheet at

Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy P Street, NW, Washington, DC (202)

Tax reform conference language released... 1

Income Taxes and Tax Rates for Sample Families, 2006 Greg Leiserson. December 2006

The Effects of the Bush Tax Cuts on State Tax Revenues

The U.S. Tax Cut and Jobs Act

PRESIDENT TRUMP AND TAX REFORM ARE WE THERE YET? CONFUSION REIGNS: WILL SIGNIFICANT REFORM ACTUALLY HAPPEN?

CTJ. Citizens for Tax Justice

A Primer on New Mexico s Tax System

TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT. National Economic Council

FASB Looks to. Leslie F. Seidman, FASB Chair. Annual Tax Update Marriage and Taxes Estate Tax Portability Tax Preferences for Education

CHILD BENEFIT CHARGE

Tax and Revenue Decisions Facing Congress and the President

TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT OF 2017 (TCJA) and Its Potential Impact

KEY PROVISIONS OF THE TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT (TCJA) OF 2017

An Analysis of the 2004 House Tax Cuts. Leonard E. Burman 1 The Urban Institute and The Tax Policy Center. June 2004

What's in the Tax Agreement for Individuals?

continue to average 0.2 percent of GDP from 2018 through 2028, CBO projects.

NEW TAX CUTS PRIMARILY BENEFITING MILLIONAIRES SLATED TO TAKE EFFECT IN JANUARY

Tax Reform in the 2016 Presidential Campaign

Impact of Tax Reform on Individuals. Barbara Coats, CPA

Chapter 16: Financing Government Section 2

Client Tax Letter. Income Tax Rates Hold Steady. What s Inside. Still a Bargain. April/May/June 2011

FISCAL FACT No. 516 July, 2016 Director of Federal Projects Key Findings Embargoed

Repeal and Replace Obamacare Act: A proposal made by Trump during the campaign to fully repeal the ACA.

North Carolina Justice Center Opportunity and Prosperity for All THE FUTURE IS NOW: A Plan to Modernize North Carolina s Revenue System.

Everywhere a Tax Break Is It Responsible Budgeting? Iowa lawmakers agenda raises questions about sustainability, fairness

Capitalizing on Tax Reform: 2018 Strategies and Long-Term Opportunities. Private Wealth Advisory

An Overview of Recent Tax Reform Proposals

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017: What Taxpayers Need to Know Presented by Shabri Moore

Barn Report. A Dairy Keeper Resource

Bloomberg reports that stocks lost $1.1 trillion in value.

An Overview of the Tax Provisions in the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act: Impact on Individuals

Tax Reform and its Impact on Individuals and Businesses

What the New Tax Laws Mean to You

Governor s tax cut plan sets stage for service cuts Reforms for fairness and simplicity could be achieved without losing revenue

Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy 1311 L Street, N.W. Washington, D.C (202)

Most of the provisions discussed below apply beginning in 2018, and many terminate after 2025.

Notes and Definitions Numbers in the text, tables, and figures may not add up to totals because of rounding. Dollar amounts are generally rounded to t

Values Provisions in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (H.R. 1)

From the Hill to the Street: An insider s perspective. Not FDIC Insured Not Bank Guaranteed May Lose Value

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

How Do the Presidential Candidates Tax Plans Affect Taxpayers Marginal Tax Rates?

Congress Passes Fiscal Cliff Act

THE NATIONAL COMMISSION ON FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY AND REFORM. The Moment of Truth

2018 Year-End Tax Planning for Individuals

H.R. 1 TAX CUT AND JOBS ACT. By: Michelle McCarthy, Esq. and Tyler Murray, Esq.

The Debate over Expiring Tax Cuts: What about the Deficit? Adam Looney

2019 Tax Brackets. FISCAL FACT No. 624 Nov Amir El-Sibaie

TAXES ARE A CHILDREN S ISSUE

Preliminary Details and Analysis of the Senate s 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

Highlights of the Senate Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

Tomorrow s Scholar 529 Plan

Bank Tax Planning: A New Era of Taxation?

THE TAX POLICY. BRIEFING BOOK A Citizens' Guide for the 2008 Election and Beyond

How Missouri Funds State Services. Introduction to the Missouri Budget

Tax Reform Accomplished: How Does the Legislation Affect Investors and Businesses? Andrew H. Friedman Jeffrey B. Bush The Washington Update

New Tax Rules for 2018 What You Need to Know to Reduce Your Tax Burden

The Debate over Expiring Tax Cuts: What about the Deficit? Adam Looney*

I. The Plan. Third Way Middle Class Project Memo. July 31, 2006

Client Letter: Year-End Tax Planning for 2018 (Individuals)

Calculating MAGI Under the Tax Cut and Jobs Act

Understanding the Effects of the 2001, 2003, and 2004 Income Tax Cuts

Budget. Reducing Income Tax

LAST MINUTE TAX PLANNING TIPS AND SURPRISES FOR Presented by: James J. Holtzman, CFP, CPA

Charitable Giving Techniques

Tomorrow s Scholar 529 Plan

Federal Tax Policy and the States

SPECIAL REPORT: Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017

INTRODUCTION TAXES: EQUITY VS. EFFICIENCY WEALTH PERSONAL INCOME THE LORENZ CURVE THE SIZE DISTRIBUTION OF INCOME

CONGRESS JANUARY Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (H.R. 1)

At the end of Class 20, you will be able to answer the following:

2017 Year-End Tax Planning

INDIVIDUAL YEAR END NEWSLETTER DEC 2018

Tax Update Focusing on the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of John F. Ermer, CPA Israel O. Perez, CPA

2017 Year-End Tax Reminders

Time is running out to make important planning moves before the year s end, so don t delay.

Transcription:

January 11 13, 2000 5 pages Contact: Bob McIntyre, 202/626-3780 CTJ Releases Analysis of McCain Tax Plan The tax plan announced on Jan. 11 by Sen. John McCain would provide little or no benefit to the three-fifths of taxpayers who earn less than $39,000 a year; it also offers little to the one percent of taxpayers who make more than $319,000. Instead: # More than half of McCain s proposed tax cuts would go to taxpayers making between $65,000 and $130,000 a year, a group that includes 15% of all taxpayers. # Most of the rest of McCain s tax cuts would be divided between the 20 percent of taxpayers making between $39,000 and $65,000 (who get 21% of the cuts) and the 4 percent of taxpayers making from $130,000 to $319,000 (who get 19%). # Overall, the McCain plan would cut taxes by about $500 billion over ten years. These are the results of an analysis of the McCain tax plan using the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy s Tax Model, and released by Citizens for Tax Justice. Starting point for 28% tax bracket would be increased The centerpiece of McCain s tax cut plan would substantially raise the starting points for the 28% income tax bracket. Overall, McCain s plan would move almost 17 million taxpayers out of the 28% bracket, cutting their top marginal income tax rate to 15%. # The McCain plan would increase the percentage of taxpayers in the 15% income tax bracket or below from 74.2 percent under current law to 87.4 percent. # Put another way, the number of taxpayers in income tax brackets higher than 15% would be cut in half, from 25.8 percent of all taxpayers to 12.6 percent. # Of course, by definition, raising the starting point for the 28% tax bracket offers no benefit to the three-quarters of taxpayers who are already in a lower bracket under current law. Corporate loopholes targeted The other key element of McCain s tax plan is a proposal to pay for a large portion of the tax cuts with an array of corporate loophole-closing provisions, which McCain estimates would raise $151.7 billion over five years. Comparison to George W. Bush s tax plan Neither the McCain tax plan nor Gov. George W. Bush s competing, $1.7 trillion (over ten years) tax cut plan would provide much benefit to the bottom three-fifths of taxpayers. Bush assigns about 11 percent of his tax cuts to this large group of taxpayers; McCain, only about 5 percent. Besides their huge disparity in overall size, perhaps the sharpest difference between the two plans is what they offer to people at the very top of the income scale. # Bush s plan targets 36.9 percent of its tax cuts to the top one percent of all

Page 2 of 5 The McCain & Bush Tax 50% 52.3% 40% 30% % of McCain tax cuts % of Bush tax cuts 36.9% 20% 10% 21.2% 15.4% 21.1% 19.1% 15.7% 3.0% 7.4% 5.5% none 0.6% none 1.8% Lowest 20% Second 20% Middle 20% Fourth 20% Next 15% Next 4% Top 1% Income Group taxpayers, offering them an average tax reduction of more than $50,000 each. # In contrast, McCain s plan gives only 1.8 percent of its net tax cuts to the bestoff one percent. Details of the McCain tax plan: 1. Over five years, the starting points for the 28% tax bracket would be increased, from the current $43,050 in taxable income to $70,000 for couples, from $34,550 to $52,000 for single parents, and from $25,750 to $35,000 for singles without children. Note that the dollar figures refer to taxable income, so that, for example, families of four would get no benefit until their total income exceeds about $65,000 (in 1999 dollars). The full benefit would not be realized until income approaches $100,000. Because the new starting point for the 28% bracket for couples would be double the single level (although not twice the level for single parents), the change would reduce marriage penalties for many couples. 2. The $500 per child tax credit would be increased to $750 per child in 2001 and to $1,000 per child in 2002 and thereafter. 3. The estate tax exemption would be increased from the current $1 million to $5 million (effectively $10 million for couples), phased in over ten years.

Page 3 of 5 4. Over five years, the standard deduction for couples would be increased by 19% (to twice the single amount) and for single parents by 16%. These changes would provide tax relief to many filers who take the standard deduction, as well as to some itemizers. (About 2 million current itemizers would switch to the increased standard deductions.) 5. Up to $200 ($400 for couples) in interest and dividends would be tax-exempt. 6. Limits for 401(k) plan contributions would be increased to $15,000 a year, and similar changes would be made to certain other kinds of retirement savings plans.. 7. Medical Savings Accounts would no longer be limited to 750,000 taxpayers; the annual contribution limit on Education Savings Accounts would be doubled to $1,000; and new tax-deferred Family Savings Accounts would be provided for bottom-bracket taxpayers (few of who could afford to take advantage of them). 8. Long-term care insurance premiums would be made deductible. 9. Military personnel overseas would be exempt from tax on some or all of their earnings. 10. A 100% tax credit would be provided for gifts to public and private elementary and secondary schools, up to $200 a year. If all eligible taxpayers took advantage of this free opportunity to help their local schools, this provision could cost more than $17 billion a year (in 1999 dollars). Sen. McCain s estimate of the size of his tax cuts does not appear to reflect the large potential cost of this school-aid program, which could be implemented more straightforwardly and with better targeting through direct grants to schools. (The distribution tables that follow do not include this credit, which appears to be intended as a backdoor way to funnel money to schools, rather than as a tax relief program.) 11. To offset much of the cost of his tax cuts, Sen. McCain proposes to curtail numerous corporate tax breaks, totaling $151.7 billion over five years. Sen. McCain provides an illustrative list, but does not specify the exact loopholes he would close. Two pages of tables detailing the estimated effects of the McCain plan follow.

Page 4 of 5 Effects of John McCain s Tax Cut Proposals (Annual effects at 1999 income levels, $-billions except averages) Income Group Income Range Average Income Personal Income Tax Estate Tax Reduction Corporate Loophole Closings Total Net Tax Average Net Tax % of Total Tax Lowest 20% Less than $13,600 $ 8,600 $ 0.1 $ 0.0 $ +0.1 $ 0.0 $ Second 20% $13,600 24,400 18,800 1.3 0.0 +1.3 0.0 Middle 20% $24,400 39,300 31,100 6.3 0.0 +2.3 4.0 157 5.5% Fourth 20% $39,300 64,900 50,700 19.0 0.0 +3.7 15.3 603 21.2% Next 15% $64,900 130,000 86,800 43.2 0.0 +5.6 37.6 1,981 52.3% Next 4% $130,000 319,000 183,000 17.5 2.5 +6.2 13.7 2,715 19.1% Top 1% $319,000 or more 915,000 4.2 14.5 +17.4 1.3 1,034 1.8% ALL $ 50,800 $ 91.6 $ 17.0 $ +36.7 $ 71.9 $ 564 100.0% ADDENDUM Bottom 60% Less than $39,300 $ 19,500 $ 7.7 $ 0.0 $ +3.7 $ 4.0 $ 52 5.5% Top 10% $92,500 or more 218,000 42.5 17.0 +26.4 33.1 2,611 46.0% Income tax changes include the effects of: (1) raising the starting points for the 28% tax bracket, from the current $43,050 in taxable income to $70,000 for couples, from $34,550 to $52,000 for single parents, and from $25,750 to $35,000 for singles without children; (2) increasing the standard deduction for couples by 19% (to double the single amount) and for single parents by 16%; (3) a $200 exclusion ($400 joint) for interest and dividends; (4) doubling the $500 per child tax credit to $1,000 per child; and (5) and raising the limit for 401(k) plan contributions to $15,000 a year. Alternative minimum tax exemptions were increased to avoid anomalies, as Sen. McCain promises. Proposed expansions of Medical Savings Accounts and Education Savings Accounts, new Family Savings Accounts, long-term care insurance deductions, tax breaks for overseas military personnel and a $200, 100% tax credit for donations to schools are not included. Sen. McCain's estate tax reduction would raise the exemption from the current $1 million to $5 million (effectively $10 million for couples). Figures rely on Sen. McCain's promised revenues from his corporate loophole-closing provisions, which were allocated to individuals here based on capital income. Many tax changes would be phased in. The annual effects are shown here fully effective at 1999 levels. Source: Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy Tax Model, Jan. 13, 2000. Preliminary. Citizens for Tax Justice, Jan. 13, 2000 Changes in Marginal Tax Rates Under the McCain Tax Plan Regular Top Income Tax Bracket Current Law McCain Plan Changes % of all taxpayers % of all taxpayers % changes Zero 30.6 24.0% 32.4 25.4% +1.8 +6% 15% 64.1 50.2% 79.1 62.0% +15.1 +23% 28% 27.1 21.3% 10.4 8.1% 16.8 62% 31% 3.2 2.5% 3.2 2.5% 36% 1.3 1.0% 1.3 1.0% 39.6% 1.2 1.0% 1.2 1.0% ALL 127.6 100.0% 127.6 100.0% 15% or less 94.7 74.2% 111.5 87.4% +16.8 +18% 28% or more 32.9 25.8% 16.1 12.6% 16.8 51%

Page 5 of 5 Estimated Revenue Effects of Sen. John McCain s Tax Plan ($-billions) 1999 Fiscal Year Effects Items Full Yr.* 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2001-05 2001-10 Personal income tax cuts: Raise 28% bracket starting points (5-year phase in) $ 63.9 Fiscal year effects are included in Subtotal, income taxes, below Child credit doubled 18.1 " Standard deduction increase for couples (over 5 years) Interest & dividend exclusion ($200/400) 6.2 " 2.5 " 401k limits raised by 50% 0.8 " Other income tax changes (except school credits)** 2.2 " Subtotal, income taxes $ 93.8 $ 4.4 $ 23.0 $ 45.3 $ 63.6 $ 82.2 $ 102.1 $ 116.0 $ 119.5 $ 123.2 $ 127.0 $ 218.6 $ 806.4 Estate & gift tax cuts 17.0 1.6 3.6 5.6 7.9 10.3 13.0 15.9 19.1 22.6 18.7 99.7 Subtotal, tax cuts $ 110.8 $ 4.4 $ 24.6 $ 48.9 $ 69.2 $ 90.1 $ 112.5 $ 129.0 $ 135.5 $ 142.3 $ 149.6 $ 237.3 $ 906.1 Corporate loophole closing +36.7 +3.8 +23.2 +35.3 +43.8 +45.6 +47.4 +49.3 +51.3 +53.3 +55.5 +151.7 +408.4 TOTAL $ 74.0 $ 0.6 $ 1.4 $ 13.6 $ 25.4 $ 44.5 $ 65.1 $ 79.7 $ 84.2 $ 89.0 $ 94.1 $ 85.6 $ 497.7 Addendum School tax credits** 100% utililization $ 17.4 $ 7.1 $ 17.8 $ 18.0 $ 18.1 $ 18.3 $ 18.5 $ 18.7 $ 18.9 $ 19.1 $ 19.2 $ 79.3 $ 173.6 50% utilization 9.3 3.8 9.6 9.7 9.8 9.9 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 42.6 93.4 *Reflects the annual effects of the proposals when fully effective, at 1999 levels. **Not included in distribution table. Note: Sen. McCain says that his tax cut proposals (before corporate offsets) will total $237.3 billion over their first five years. To match that total (excluding school credits), the estimates here assume, unless otherwise explicitly stated in Sen. McCain's detailed description of his plan, that many of the various phase-ins (most notably the five-year phase-ins for the increases in the 28% tax bracket starting points and the standard deduction for couples) would not begin until calendar 2002. Sen. McCain makes clear that his proposed increase in the $500 child credit would take half effect in calendar 2001 and full effect in 2002. Several other provisions are said to take immediate effect, but the starting year is not specified. See John McCain, 21st Century Family Security Plan, Jan. 11, 2000. Because of the phase-ins, the estimated net cost of the McCain plan would be $412 billion in its second five fiscal years (fiscal 2006-10), compared to only $86 billion over the first five years (fiscal 2001-05). Source: Citizens for Tax Justice estimates (preliminary), Jan. 13, 2000.