THE NETHERLANDS Donor Profile

Similar documents
Getting ready for the budget season what to look out for September 2017

NORWAY Donor Profile

NORWAY Donor Profile

Official web site of the Ministry:

Section 1: Understanding the specific financial nature of your commitment better

The DAC s main findings and recommendations. Extract from: OECD Development Co-operation Peer Reviews

ITALY Donor Profile. At the frontline of the refugee crisis, Italy focuses on root causes of migration to Europe.

POLAND. AT A GLANCE: Gross bilateral ODA (unless otherwise shown)

The DAC s main findings and recommendations. Extract from: OECD Development Co-operation Peer Reviews

The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the new European Consensus on Development

CANADA Donor Profile

Implementation of Sustainable Development Goals in the European Union. Focus on development cooperation. Carlos BERROZPE GARCÍA

DFID s Vision of Aid Effectiveness

Global Affairs Canada (GAC) Statistics on Civil Society Organizations Updated as of June 2016

GUIDELINES FOR STRATEGIES IN SWEDISH DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION AND HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE

Council conclusions on the EU role in Global Health. 3011th FOREIGN AFFAIRS Council meeting Brussels, 10 May 2010

Global ODA Trends. Topics

The role of the EU in international cooperation

EuropeAid. Presentation to Serbia Brussels, July, 2014

SPAIN Donor Profile. Spain places a strong focus on cooperation with middle-income countries; in Bolivia, it supports access to water and sanitation.

FRANCE Donor Profile

Making the EU commitments a reality through smart programming November 2018

CONCORD Principles for the EU Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) ???

The DAC s main findings and recommendations. Extract from: OECD Development Co-operation Peer Reviews

9644/10 YML/ln 1 DG E II

Written Evidence for the Scottish Parliament European & External Relations Committee

WIDER Development Conference September 2018: Aid Policy Continuity or Change? Richard Manning

Development Assistance for HealTH

ACP-EU JOINT PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY

SOUTH KOREA Donor Profile

Chapter 2. Non-core funding of multilaterals

EVALUATION WORK PROGRAMME FOR STRATEGIC EVALUATIONS

Programming Aid Instruments

Koos Richelle Director General of EuropeAid

DEVELOPMENT CO-OPERATION REPORT 2010

2014 June. Trends in donor spending on Sexual and Gender-Based Violence (SGBV)

CIVIL SOCIETY AID TRENDS 2015 Baobab Briefing No 3

Structured dialogue on financing the results of the UNICEF Strategic Plan,

Donor Government Funding for Family Planning in 2016

2010 DAC REPORT ON MULTILATERAL AID

Introduction

Climate Financing by Luxembourg 1

EU FUNDING PROGRAMMES IN THE FIELD OF DEVELOPMENT AID

Economic and Social Council. Operational Activities for Development Segment February 2015

Support to the Global Financing Facility (GFF), the World Bank

CERF Guidance Note Underfunded Emergencies window: 2018 Second Round 31 May 2018

7 Supreme Audit Institutions partnering to review government preparedness to implement the SDGs

Public Financial Management (PFMx)

June with other international donors including emerging to raise their level of ambition in line with that of the EU

Public financial management is an essential part of the development process.

Strengthening the Coherence of the Financing for Development and Effective Development Cooperation Agendas

FRAMEWORK FOR RESOURCE MOBILIZATION FOR THE GFF

2014 September. Trends in donor spending on gender in development. Introduction.

European Donor Support to Sexual & Reproductive Health & Family Planning. Trends Analysis

FINLAND. Development Assistance Committee (DAC) PEER REVIEW ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT

Compliance Report Okinawa 2000 Development. Commitments 1. Debt

SPAIN Donor Profile STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

Framework Programmes

Ver 5 26Sep2016. Background Note. Funding situation of the UN development system

Annex 3: UNDP footprint and programme expenditure by source of funds

BACKGROUND PAPER ON COUNTRY STRATEGIC PLANS

THE SWEDISH OPEN GOVERNMENT PARTNERSHIP ACTION PLAN MORE EFFECTIVELY MANAGING PUBLIC RESOURCES IN DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION

EN Official Journal of the European Union L 77/77

TOSSD AND TYPES OF AID INVOLVING NO CROSS-BORDER RESOURCE FLOWS

What is EACSOF? Achievements

CERF Guidance Note and Timeline Underfunded Emergencies First Round 12 November 2018

Organisation strategy for Sweden s cooperation with the Green Climate Fund for

Tracking RH/FP Policies & Funding:

STATISTICS ON INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

ANNEX. 1. IDENTIFICATION Beneficiary CRIS/ABAC Commitment references Total cost EU Contribution Budget line. Turkey IPA/2017/40201

THE MILLENNIUM PROMISE ALLIANCE, INC.

ROUNDTABLE 2 SUMMARY

IFS Green Budget 2018 How the UK spends its aid budget. Ross Warwick, Institute for Fiscal Studies

Partnering with IFC. Anita Bhatia and Urkaly Isaev October 2014 THE POWER OF PARTNERSHIPS

Donors engagement: Supporting education in fragile and conflictaffected

Indicator 6.a.1: Amount of water- and sanitation-related official development assistance that is part of a government-coordinated spending plan

The world of CARE. CARE International Member Countries A Australia B Austria C Canada D Denmark. E France F Germany G Japan H Netherlands

united Nations agencies

What funding for EU external action after 2013?

REPORT FROM NCA BOARD OF DIRECTORS, 2016

IFC Trust Funds Trust Fund Annual Report. Overall Trends. its standard-setting, and its work to promote a business-enabling environment.

THE EUROPEAN UNION Donor Profile

Budget 2013: Implications for Canadian ODA 1

Social Inclusion Foundation in Bosnia and Herzegovina

72 ND REGULAR MEETING OF THE COMMITTEE OF PERMANENT REPRESENTATIVES TO UNITED NATIONS HUMAN SETTLEMENTS PROGRAMME 10 APRIL 2019

A Short Guide to the. Department for International Development

Canada Big changes and challenges, with new partnerships

Action Fiche for Armenia Sector Multi Sector

E Distribution: GENERAL. Executive Board First Regular Session. Rome, 8 11 February January 2010 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH

Grand Bargain annual self-reporting exercise: DFID. Work stream 1 - Transparency Baseline (only in year 1) Progress to date...

THINGS TO KNOW ABOUT EU AID

The world of CARE. CARE International Member Countries A Australia B Austria C Canada D Denmark. E France F Germany/Luxemburg G Japan H Netherlands

Health in the Post-2015 Development Agenda

THE NETHERLANDS. AT A GLANCE: Gross bilateral ODA (unless otherwise shown)

European Women s Lobby, WIDE and CONCORD Statement on European Union funding programmes for the financial period

Grand Bargain annual self-reporting exercise: The Netherlands

Measuring Aid to Health

GFF Country Workshop, January 28 February 1, Introduction to the GFF

14684/16 YML/sv 1 DGC 1

Transcription:

THE NETHERLANDS Donor Profile FUNDING TRENDS STRATEGIC PRIORITIES KEY OPPORTUNITIES Net ODA decreased from 0.75% of GNI in 2015 to 0.65% in 2016. The current government is committed to compensating for budget cuts made by the last government. Sexual and reproductive health and rights is a top priority for the Netherlands, along with food security, water management, and security and the rule of law. The new government is currently developing its strategy for development cooperation and will make amendments to the 2018 development budget. Yemen is a priority country for the Netherlands, and one with which it has a long-term development relationship; since 2015, Dutch bilateral cooperation has focused heavily on humanitarian assistance within the country. Google Earth. Image Terra Metrics- 2016 CNES/Astrium. Data SIO, NOAA, U.S. Navy, NGA, GEBCO.

THE NETHERLANDS at a glance Funding trends The Netherlands is the seventh-largest donor country, spending US$5.0 billion on net official development assistance (ODA) in 2016 (in 2016 prices). This corresponds to 0.65% of its gross national income (GNI). The government, in office since October 2017, has outlined its development plans and priorities in the coalition agreement. It has committed to compensating for the budget cuts made by the last government by increasing ODA levels in this government s term of office. Strategic priorities As of, the government is developing its strategy for development policy, expected in the Spring of 2018. Based on the coalition agreement, the policy will focus on combatting the root causes of poverty, migration, terror, and climate change. Under the new government, the Netherlands will maintain its four traditional thematic priorities: 1) security and the rule of law, 2) water management, 3) food securiwty, and 4) sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR, including HIV/AIDS). Geographically, Dutch development assistance is concentrated on sub-saharan Africa and low-income countries. However, the current government announced in its coalition agreement a review of its existing partner-country relationships, which will entail the addition of Jordan, Lebanon, and Iraq. Key opportunities Due to delays in the formation of the government in 2017, the 2018 national budget, including the development budget, is still up for review by the new government. It will reflect the priorities outlined in the upcoming strategy. The new government is committed to gradually increasing ODA levels over the coming four years. This provides an opportunity to advocate for increased funding to programs, especially in Dutch priority areas. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is currently reviewing its strategy for development cooperation. In this process, it seeks input from civil society organizations (CSO), providing opportunities to engage on priorities and focus areas. 2 donortracker.org

KEY QUESTIONS the big six How much ODA does the Netherlands provide? ODA is expected to rise during current legislative term In 2016, the Netherlands was the seventh-largest donor country among members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC) of the OECD, spending US$5.0 billion on net ODA (in 2016 prices). Dutch ODA stood at 0.65% of GNI in 2016, a share expected to decrease to 0.60% in 2017 and 0.54% in 2018, due to a drop in costs for hosting refugees in the Netherlands and budget cuts made by the previous government. In 2012, the government of former Prime Minister Mark Rutte (Cabinet Rutte II, 2012-2017) had decided to maintain ODA levels at 750 million (US$830 million) below what would have been the 0.7% target for 2014 to 2016, and at 1 billion below from 2017 onwards. In its coalition agreement, presented in October 2017, the new government reversed this decision. It committed to compensating for the cuts made by the last government by gradually increasing development funding over the coming four years. An additional 1 billion (US$1.1 billion), equal to 22% of 2016 s net ODA, will be added to the budget over the 2019-2022 period, according to the coalition agreement. The government announced its intention to start the increases in 2018, with an additional 400 million, and follow with 300 million in 2019, 200 million in 2020 and 100 million in 2021. These additional amounts have not yet been included in the 2018 budget and will be discussed during the budget process in the Spring. Since 2014, the Netherlands has received a high number of asylum seekers. It takes some of the costs incurred to host refugees from the ODA budget, which has reduced funding available for global development. These in-country costs amounted to US$785 million (22% of bilateral ODA) in 2014 and US$1.3 billion (31% of bilateral ODA) in 2015. In 2016, these costs decreased to US$538 million (16% of bilateral ODA), according to the OECD Creditor Reporting System (CRS). 1 1.2 billion was drawn from future ODA budgets by the former government to cover these costs in 2016 and 2017. The new government has committed in its coalition agreement to reinject this 1.2 billion, in addition to the 1 billion increase mentioned above. The new government is committed to stepping up its support to climate financing, aiming to spend 400 million (US$ 442 million) of ODA resources in 2018 on climate-relevant expenditures in developing countries. Of the 400 million, 130 million will be delivered through a dedicated, stand-alone budget line, whereas the remaining 270 million is part of the regular expenditure from the ODA budget. 3 donortracker.org

Further information: 2016 prices To compare ODA levels in any given year with ODA levels provided in other years, figures need to be adjusted to account for inflation and exchange rate fluctuations. The OECD provides data that accounts for these fluctuations. In this profile, and unless indicated otherwise, figures are stated using 2016 prices. 4 donortracker.org

KEY QUESTIONS the big six What are the Netherlands strategic priorities for development? Focus is on four thematic priorities The former government laid out the objectives and priorities of Dutch development policy in the strategy paper: A World to Gain: A New Agenda for Aid, Trade and Investment (released in 2013). As of, a new development strategy is under development in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Traditionally, the Netherlands focuses its development assistance on four thematic priorities: 1) security and the rule of law, 2) water management, 3) food security, and 4) sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR, including HIV/AIDS). Other priorities include climate protection, humanitarian assistance, private-sector development, women s rights, and gender equality. The Netherlands puts a strong emphasis on the interlinkages between these priority themes in its policies and programs. These priorities are based on the added value and expertise of the Netherlands, and are likely to remain unchanged under the new strategy. According to the coalition agreement of the new government, the overall aim of Dutch development cooperation for this legislative period is combatting the root causes of poverty, migration, terrorism, and climate change within the framework of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, the traditional Dutch development priorities will continue to remain in place. Additionally, the new government plans to increase its focus on the most vulnerable groups, such as women and children. Increased funding for humanitarian assistance and refugees; decreased funding for CSOs According to OECD data, the Netherlands channeled almost two thirds (65%, or US$3.3 billion) of its total ODA bilaterally in 2016. However, 16% (US$538 million) of this was used to cover the costs of hosting refugees within the Netherlands, making it the largest expenditure area of bilateral ODA. Despite decreases since 2012, the second-largest share of bilateral ODA was allocated through government and civil society (15%). Since the end of 2015, funding for CSOs has been further cut and was increasingly channeled through the funding scheme Dialogue and Dissent. Strategic partnerships for lobby and advocacy The Netherlands key development priorities: Sexual and reproductive health and rights (including HIV/AIDS) Security and the rule of law Water management Food security (2016-2020). This scheme puts an emphasis on advocacy work (as opposed to provision of services and goods) and strategic partnerships. The Netherlands has stepped up its support for humanitarian assistance and is a strong advocate for this both at the United Nations (UN) and European Union (EU) level. The country allocated 10% of bilateral ODA to humanitarian assistance in 2016. Humanitarian assistance peaked in 2015, increasing by 88% compared to 2014. This peak was driven by the creation of the Emergency Aid Fund ( 570 million or US$630 million for 2014 to 2017) to support victims of conflict and natural disasters. In 2016, funding for humanitarian assistance decreased again (by 31%), going from US$475 million to US$326 million. According to its own reporting, the Netherlands spent 400 (US$442 million) on emergency assistance in 2017. As part of this funding came from the Emergency Aid Fund (which ended in 2017), Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation Minister Sigrid Kaag has committed to compensate for this loss, by allocating an additional 140 million (US$155 million) for emergency funding in regions affected by conflict in 2018. This funding comes on top of the 204 million originally budgeted for humanitarian assistance in 2018 (see question four: How is the Dutch ODA budget structured? for more details). The funding will be used to support shelter for refugees and vulnerable populations, as well as educational programs in Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq, and the Horn of Africa. Global health, and particularly SRHR, is another major priority area of Dutch development cooperation. Health accounted for 9% of Dutch bilateral ODA in 2016. However, total ODA to health is much higher, as the Netherlands 5 donortracker.org

channels more than half (52% in 2015, the latest year for which complete data is available) of health ODA multilaterally. Total health ODA stood at US$497 million in 2015, or 9% of Dutch ODA, which is on par with the OECD s Development Assistance Committee (DAC) average. The Dutch government continues to be a global leader on SRHR: in 2017, it launched the global initiative She Decides in 2017 to support organizations that focus on SRHR and family planning. (See question six: How is Dutch ODA spent? for more details.) For further information on global health, see Deep Dive: Global Health. the new United States (US) administration to cut funding to organizations that support access to or provide information about safe abortion. (See question six: How is Dutch ODA spent? for more details.) For further information on global health, see Deep Dive: Global Health. 6 donortracker.org

KEY QUESTIONS the big six Who are the main actors in Dutch development cooperation? Minister for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation leads on strategy; embassies administer bilateral ODA Prime Minister Mark Rutte (People s Party for Freedom and Democracy, VVD) leads a coalition government with the social-liberal Democrats 66 (D66), the Christian Democratic Appeal (CDA) and the Christian Union (CU). The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) defines priorities for Dutch development policy. It is headed by Stef Blok (VVD) as of. Minister for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation (MFTDC), Sigrid Kaag (D66), leads the MFA s work on development cooperation. Within the MFA, the Directorate-General for International Cooperation (DGIS) is responsible for designing and coordinating the implementation of development policy. Unlike many other donor countries, the Netherlands does not have an implementing agency. The Dutch embassies are in charge of strategic planning and the administration of bilateral programs. The role of Parliament is to scrutinize development policy and budget allocations. Parliament can annually amend the government s draft budget bill. Parliamentary debates in November/December can lead to significant changes to the ODA budget. Dutch civil society organizations (CSOs) play an active role in Dutch development cooperation. The development CSO umbrella association, Partos, represents over 100 organizations. They engage with the Parliament and the MFA for advocacy. Many CSOs implement their own programs in developing countries and are funded by the Dutch government and through private donations. In 2016, 26% of the country s bilateral ODA was channeled through CSOs. However, since the end of 2015, program funding for CSOs has been sharply cut and a larger focus has been placed on strategic partnerships and advocacy. THE NETHERLANDS' DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION SYSTEM 7 donortracker.org

KEY QUESTIONS the big six How is the Dutch ODA budget structured? The Minister for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation manages more than half of total ODA The 2018 draft ODA budget, presented in September 2017, stands at 4.1 billion (US$4.6 billion). The Minister for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation (MFTDC), which is part of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA), manage the largest share of ODA, followed by the Minister of Foreign Affairs independently. It is important to note that there are parts of ODA that fall under other ministries, such as the contributions to the development banks or the EU budget. The Homogeneous Budget for International Cooperation (HGIS) has been a budgetary structure within the national budget since 1997. In the HGIS, the foreign policy budgets of individual ministries, including specific ODA allocations per ministry, are combined. The HGIS thus forms an important instrument for an integrated and coherent foreign policy, and it is complementary to the Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation budget. The Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation budget is organized around thematic areas (see table below). The envelopes for these thematic areas are usually split further into funding lines for bilateral country programs, grants and contributions to multilaterals, and other organizations working in that thematic area. Overview: The Netherlands' 2018 draft ODA budget Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation millions millions US$ 2,354 2,604 Sustainable trade and investment 407 450 Sustainable development, food security and water 664 735 Food security, of which: 337 373 Grants 134 148 Contributions to international organizations Water management, drinking water, and sanitation 204 225 199 220 Natural resources, climate change 128 142 Social progress 724 800 SRHR, incl. HIV/AIDS, of which: 416 460 Grants 175 194 Contributions to international organizations (incl. Global Fund, UNFPA, UNAIDS, country programs etc.) 242 268 Women's rights 53 58 Other (Mainly CSO support) 255 282 Peace and security 396 438 Strengthend frameworks for development 163 181 Multilateral organizations (UN agencies) 131 145 Other 32 36 Foreign Affairs 559 618 Ministry of Finance (funding for development banks) 307 339 Multilateral development banks 275 304 Other ministries 60 66 Other ODA expenses 864 956 EU budget 330 365 Costs for hosting refugees in the Netherlands 534 591 Total ODA (gross) 4,144 4,583 Source: HGIS nota 2018 and Rijksbegroting 2018 8 donortracker.org

KEY QUESTIONS the big six What are important decision-making opportunities in the Dutch annual budget process? Ministerial budget ceilings are set in April/May; allocation decisions are made between May and July Ministries develop initial budget proposal: From February to March, the ministries, including the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, develop their initial budget proposals for the coming year and decide on spending increases or decreases for the main policy areas. The Minister for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation and the Minister of Foreign Affairs are the main decision-makers during this process, and the thematic departments of the Directorate-General for International Cooperation (DGIS) are also important stakeholders as they are responsible for designing and coordinating the implementation of Dutch development policy. Ministries update their current budgets: During the spring, ministers update the budgets of the current year to reflect any changes that have occurred since the draft budget was presented in the previous fall. This is known as the spring budget. While the Parliament has the right to amend the budget, changes are rarely made. The spring budget is published on June 1 at the latest every year. Cabinet decides on ministerial budgets: In August, the cabinet decides on ministerial budgets for the following budget year. Important decision-makers are the Minister for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation, the Minister of Foreign Affairs, and the Minister of Finance. Draft budget presented to Parliament: On the third Tuesday of September, the government presents its budget bill to the Parliament. Parliament debates and approves budget: The ODA budget is debated and amended by the Committee on Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation of the House of Representatives at the end of November. Parliamentary debates in November/December can lead to significant changes to the draft budget. In 2015, for example, Parliament amended the budget in order to increase the Dutch contribution to Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, by 50 million (US$55 million). The budget has to be approved before the end of the year. 9 donortracker.org

KEY QUESTIONS the big six How is Dutch ODA spent? All ODA is delivered as grants; role of CSOs in implementation is decreasing; stronger focus on private sector According to OECD data, the Netherlands channeled almost two thirds (65%, or US$3.3 billion) of its total ODA bilaterally in 2016. However, 16% or US$538 million of this was used to cover the costs of hosting refugees within the Netherlands, making it the largest expenditure area of bilateral ODA. The largest recipients of core contributions to multilateral organizations were the International Development Association (IDA; US$573 million), the European Commission (US$365 million), and the European Development Fund (US$193 million). In addition to these core contributions, the Netherlands channeled 15% of its ODA through multilaterals in the form of funding earmarked for specific thematic priorities or regions (this is reported to the OECD as bilateral ODA). Thus, in total, 50% of Dutch ODA in 2016 was implemented by multilateral organizations (see figure). The Netherlands bilateral ODA is allocated as grants (as opposed to loans). There is no Dutch implementation agency. Instead, Dutch embassies are responsible for implementing bilateral programs with partner countries. Civil society organizations (CSOs) play an important role in implementation, channeling 26% of bilateral ODA in 2016. At the end of 2015, the largest CSO funding system ( 1.9 billion or US$2.1 billion for 2011 2015) came to an end, with cuts mainly affecting direct program implementation funding. The government established a new funding scheme Dialogue and Dissent. Strategic partnerships for lobby and advocacy (2016-2020), which puts an emphasis on advocacy work (as opposed to provision of services and goods) and strategic partnerships between 25 CSOs and the Ministry of Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation. Who are the Netherland's ODA recipients? Dutch ODA has a strong focus on low-income countries and targets sub-saharan Africa While the current government is still deciding on its partner countries, the Netherlands has shown some clear trends in choosing their ODA recipients. The Netherlands has traditionally placed a priority on sub-saharan Africa. Sub-Saharan Africa received 17% of the Netherlands bilateral ODA between 2014 and 2016, which is below the OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC) average of 22%. However, 70% of bilateral ODA is not allocated to specific countries (this mainly includes funding for CSOs, earmarked funding for multilaterals, and costs for hosting refugees). When excluding these funds, sub-saharan Africa accounted for 57% of bilateral ODA between 2014 and 2016. Dutch development policy has usually focused on the poorest countries. When only considering funding that is allocated to specific countries, almost two-thirds (65%) of bilateral ODA between 2014 and 2016 went to low-income countries (LICs) (14% if total bilateral ODA is considered). Seven of the top 10 recipients of Dutch bilateral ODA and 11 of the Netherlands current 15 partner countries are LICs. The Netherlands selects its partner countries based on poverty level, their potential for alignment with Dutch thematic priorities where the Netherlands expertise is of greatest value the potential for regional interventions (countries in a region where the Netherlands is already present), and where root causes of displacement can be tackled. Private-sector development is an important focus area for the Netherlands. The Dutch Good Growth Fund (DGGF) had a 108.5 million budget for 2017 (US$120 million) and a 114 million budget for 2018 (US$126 million). It provides customized finance to micro-, small-, and medium-sized enterprises from the Netherlands, emerging markets, and developing countries. The government uses this fund as a tool to promote investments in trade with emerging markets and developing countries. Public-private partnerships also play a major role in implementing Dutch development cooperation policy. These partnerships are between the government, the private sector, research institutions, and CSOs; they are referred to as the Dutch Diamond Approach. 10 donortracker.org

Since 2011, the Netherlands has reduced the number of its partner countries from 33 to 15. Dutch priority countries until 2017 are divided into two categories: Fragile countries with which the Netherlands maintains aid relationships (Afghanistan, Burundi, Mali, the Palestinian Territories, Rwanda, South Sudan, and Yemen), Countries with which the Netherlands maintains transitional relationships (Bangladesh, Benin, Ethiopia, Ghana, Indonesia, Kenya, Mozambique, and Uganda) to foster economic growth. The exception to this categorization is Syria, which is not designated as a priority country, yet is still a top recipient of Dutch ODA due to increased humanitarian assistance to address the conflict and support those affected. As of 2020, middle-income countries Kenya, Ghana, and Indonesia will cease to be partner countries. The relationship between the Netherlands and these countries will continue but will focus on trade, investment, and political collaboration. It is not yet clear if the Netherlands will continue to have 15 partner countries. The number of countries is currently being discussed and will be publicized in the new development policy. The Netherlands announced in 2017 that Jordan, Lebanon, and Iraq will become new priority countries. The Netherlands partnership with Rwanda will change from a development-assistance relationship to a transitional relationship in 2020. How is bilateral funding programmed? Embassies are key players in strategy development and program implementation The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) develops Multi-Annual Strategic Plans (MJSPs) for all partner countries. MJSPs cover a period of four years, although interim adjustments are possible. Current MJSPs ran from 2014 to 2017. A new strategy is currently in development, and an online consultation process to gather input from CSOs opened in February 2018. Strategic plans are based on a combination of Dutch development priorities, development priorities of the partner country, and the potential for Dutch investment returns. In close consultation with relevant thematic departments at the MFA, Dutch embassies establish programs. 11 donortracker.org

12 donortracker.org

THE NETHERLANDS outlook How will the Netherlands ODA develop? The current government, in place since October 2017, commits in its coalition agreement to compensate for the former government s ODA budget cuts. In addition, the government has announced its intention to provide an additional 1 billion over the same period. Overall, the current government plans to add a total of 2.2 billion funding to the ODA budget between 2018 and 2022. The Netherlands uses its development budget to cover the costs of hosting refugees in their first year of arrival in the Netherlands, which puts pressure on the funding available for global development programs. Costs for hosting refugees in the Netherlands will continue to constrain funding available for regular development programs in coming years. What will the Netherlands ODA focus on? The new government will center its development policy and funding around combatting the root causes of poverty, migration, terror, and climate change. The longstanding thematic priority areas 1) security and the rule of law, 2) water management, 3) food security, and 4) sexual reproductive health and rights (including HIV/AIDS) will be carried forward. Strengthening private sector development, public-private partnerships, and, more generally, linking development cooperation with Dutch foreign trade interests are also likely to remain in focus. What are key opportunities for shaping the Netherlands development policy? The current government (Rutte III Cabinet), in office since October 2017, has committed to increasing ODA levels over the coming four years. This provides an opportunity to advocate for increased funding to specific areas, especially around the Dutch priority areas. The Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs is currently reviewing its strategy for development cooperation. The Ministry is therefore seeking input of civil society organizations (CSO). The review process is a critical time for CSOs to advocate for increased ODA funding and funding into specific issue areas. Furthermore, the current government is reviewing the number and selection of partner countries, providing an opportunity to shape the geographic allocation of Dutch ODA. 13 donortracker.org

END NOTES donor tracker About the Donor Tracker The Donor Tracker seeks to advance and support progress in global development by providing advocates with easy access to high-quality quantitative and qualitative strategic information to support their work. The Donor Tracker is a free, independent website for development professionals that provides relevant information and analysis on 14 major OECD donors. For more in-depth information on the six donor countries covered in this analysis and to find out more about strategic priorities, funding trends, decision-making, and key opportunities, please visit: donortracker.org and follow us on twitter @DonorTracker The Donor Tracker is an initiative by: SEEK Development Strategic and Organizational Consultants GmbH Cotheniusstraße 3 10407 Berlin Tel: +49 (0)30-4202-5211 E-mail: donortracker@seekdevelopment.org www.seekdevelopment.org SEEK Development is grateful for contributions from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in support of this work. donortracker.org