KOREA (as of April 2014) Annex I: Banks

Similar documents
SAUDI ARABIA. Annex I: Banks

SOUTH AFRICA (as of April 2014) Annex I: Banks

MEXICO. Annex I: Banks

BRAZIL (as of April 2014) Annex I: Banks

UK Action Plan to reduce reliance on CRA Ratings

Canada Credit Rating Action Plan

Reducing Reliance on CRA Ratings

Deutsche Bank welcomes the opportunity to provide comments on the above consultation.

Emerging from the Crisis Building a Stronger International Financial System

November 28, FSB Policy Framework for Addressing Shadow Banking Risks in Securities Lending and Repos (29 August 2013) (the Policy Framework ) 1

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate General Internal Market and Services. FINANCIAL SERVICES POLICY AND FINANCIAL MARKETS Securities markets

Revisions to the Standardised Approach for credit risk

Samba Financial Group Basel III - Pillar 3 Disclosure Report. September 2017 PUBLIC

Samba Financial Group Basel III - Pillar 3 Disclosure Report. March 2018 PUBLIC

Basel II and Financial Stability: Singapore s Experience

TABLE 2: CAPITAL STRUCTURE - December 31, 2015

Royal Bank of Canada. Pillar 3 Report

DWS USA Corporation. U.S. Liquidity Coverage Ratio Disclosures. For the quarter ended December 31, 2018

Otkritie Capital International Limited. Pillar 3 disclosures for the year ended 31 December,

CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK (ASIA) CORPORATION LIMITED. Regulatory Disclosures For the year ended 31 December 2017 (Unaudited)

Liquidity Coverage Ratio Disclosures Report. For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2017

Basel III Pillar 3 disclosures 2014

November 28, Secretariat of the Financial Stability Board c/o Bank for International Settlements CH-4002, Basel, Switzerland

Pillar 3 Disclosures. Liquidity Coverage Ratio ( LCR ) For the quarter ended 31 March 2016

Regulatory Capital Pillar 3 Disclosures

International cooperation to address shadow banking risks

Discussion Paper. The Use of Credit Ratings by Financial Intermediaries Article 5(a) of the CRA Regulation

The Standardised Approach for Credit Risk November 2016

Otkritie Capital International Limited. Pillar 3 disclosures for the year ended 31 December,

Comments on the Financial Stability Board s Consultative Document Effective Resolution of Systemically Important Financial Institutions

Strengthening the Oversight and Regulation of Shadow Banking

Pillar 3 Disclosures (OCBC Group As at 31 March 2018)

RBI/ /167 DBR.No.BP.BC.43/ / December 01, 2016

Regulatory disclosures Credit Suisse Group Credit Suisse (Bank) Credit Suisse (Bank) parent company Credit Suisse International

UBS Limited. Pillar 3 Disclosures. June UBS Limited 1 Finsbury Avenue London, EC2M 2PP.

Basel II Pillar 3 disclosures

Basel II Pillar 3 disclosures

Comments on the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision s Consultative Document Revisions to the Standardised Approach for credit risk

Standard Chartered PLC Pillar 3 Disclosures 30 September 2017

Proposed regulatory framework for haircuts on securities financing transactions

Financial Innovation and Global Market Turmoil ~Preparing for the Post-Subprime World of Finance~

TABLE 2: CAPITAL STRUCTURE - March 31, 2016

Comments. Register of Interest Representatives Identification number in the register:

Regulatory disclosures Credit Suisse Group Credit Suisse (Bank) Credit Suisse (Bank) parent company Credit Suisse International

Pillar 3 and regulatory disclosures Credit Suisse Group AG 2Q17

BVI position on IOSCO s Consultation Report on Good Practices on Reducing Reliance on CRAs in asset management Reference: CR04/14

Pillar 3 Disclosure (UK)

Disclosure Report. Investec Limited Basel Pillar III semi-annual disclosure report

DB USA Corporation U.S. LIQUIDITY COVERAGE RATIO DISCLOSURES

Supplementary Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)

Information on Capital Structure, Liquidity Coverage and Leverage Ratios as per Basel-III Framework as at June 30, 2016

TSB Banking Group plc. Significant Subsidiary Disclosures 31 December TSB Banking Group plc

Regulatory Capital Pillar 3 Disclosures

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /.. of XXX

African Bank Holdings Limited and African Bank Limited

BASEL 3 COMMON DISCLOSURE TEMPLATES. as at 31 December 2017

FSB- G20 - MONITORING PROGRESS Saudi Arabia September 2010 [For Publication in March 2011]

September 28, Japanese Bankers Association

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. High-level summary of Basel III reforms

Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Limited. Supplementary Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Samba Financial Group Basel III - Pillar 3 Disclosure Report. June 2018 PUBLIC

Basel Ⅱ Implementation in Korea

PILLAR 3 REGULATORY CAPITAL DISCLOSURES

Northern Trust Corporation Liquidity Coverage Ratio Public Disclosure

Consultative Document on reducing variation in credit risk-weighted assets constraints on the use of internal model approaches

Europe Arab Bank plc - Pillar III Disclosure

PRA RULEBOOK CRR FIRMS INSTRUMENT 2013

Course 14. Capital Adequacy

Chapter 3 BASEL III IMPLEMENTATION: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN CAMBODIA. By Ban Lim 1

as at 30 June 2016 Basel 3 common disclosure templates

With our compliments. Tweaks to a sound system. By Mark Nicolaides of Latham & Watkins

Liquidity Coverage Ratio ( LCR ) For the quarter ended 31 Mar 2017

In various tables, use of - indicates not meaningful or not applicable.

Basel II Pillar 3 disclosures 6M 09

Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures Report. For the Quarterly Period Ended December 31, 2015

CONSULTATION DOCUMENT EXPLORATORY CONSULTATION ON THE FINALISATION OF BASEL III

II-Annex 2: Resolution of Insurers

Basel III Pillar III Disclosures

Pillar 3 Disclosures (OCBC Group As at 30 June 2018)

TABLE 2: CAPITAL STRUCTURE - September 30, 2018

Isabelle Vaillant Director of Regulation. European Institute of Financial Regulation (EIFR) 23 Septembre 2016

New rules on credit rating agencies (CRAs) enter into force frequently asked questions

Lombard Odier Group Pillar 3 Disclosures at 30 June 2018

Basel III Pillar 3 disclosures

Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Basel II Pillar 3 Disclosures Year ended 31 December 2009

Q4 18. Supplementary Regulatory Capital Information. For the Quarter Ended October 31, For further information, contact:

Citigroup Global Markets Limited Pillar 3 Disclosures

ROAD MAP FOR THE TRANSITION TO NEW BASEL CAPITAL ACCORD (BASEL-II) (*)

Santander response to the European Commission s Public Consultation on Credit Rating Agencies

ANNEX 4 MAIN DOCUMENTS PUBLISHED 1 BY THE INTERNATIONAL SUPERVISORY FORA: FSB, BCBS, EBA, ESRB AND ECB IN THE FRAMEWORK OF FINANCIAL STABILITY

Discussion Paper on Margin Requirements for non-centrally Cleared Derivatives

1. Scope of Application

ICS Consultation Document - Responses to Comments on Asset Concentration & Credit Risks (Sections )

Community Trust Company Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures June 30, 2018

Supplementary Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)

Subject: Guideline E-22 Margin Requirements for Non-Centrally Cleared Derivatives

Basel III Pillar 3 disclosures

Policy Guideline of the Bank of Thailand Re: Liquidity Risk Management of Financial Institutions

Basel III: Strategic and Operational Impacts

Transcription:

KOREA (as of April 2014) Annex I: Banks one year after new inter 1. Reducing reliance on CRA ratings in laws and regulations (Principle I) Based on the findings from the stock-taking exercise, please describe the areas identified as needing change and those areas considered priorities, as well as the steps authorities intend to take to reduce reliance on CRA ratings in laws and regulations. In addition, authorities should describe the incentives put in place for market participants to develop their own independent credit assessment processes. Examples of incentives might include disclosure requirements relating to credit risk assessment practices or articulating clear supervisory expectations of the extent to which firms should perform their own due diligence before making lending decisions. In relation to banking sector, Korea has the CRA-rating related provisions in its regulation and detailed regulation on supervision of banking business. The provisions were created for the purpose of adopting the Basel standards (the pillar 1 and 3). In compliance with the pillar 1 adopted, the standardised approach using banks are obligated to use the CRA ratings for the measurement of risk weighted assets. And in accordance with the pillar 3 adopted, the banks are responsible for disclosing information on how they are managing risks; the information includes the names of CRAs and how the CRA ratings are mapped into the Basel standards. Since all the CRA-rating related provisions are designed to comply with the Basel standards, reducing further the reliance on CRA ratings in Korea may have to involve the change in the Basel standards. An estimate of the number of banks using the BCBS standardised approach and the per cent of risk weighted assets covered. - Number of bank(total 18) : SA banks(7), IRB banks(11) - Per cent of risk weighted assets covered : 17.4% = asset of 7 SA banks asset of all 18 banks a) Remove references to CRA ratings in laws and regulations relating to banks. Financial Supervisory Change in the Basel Standard About one year after the change in the 1

one year after new inter b) Develop alternative standards of credit assessment, where needed, for the purpose of replacing references to CRA ratings in laws and regulations relating to banks. Service(FSS) standard is agreed upon 2. Reducing market reliance on CRA ratings (Principle II) a) Enhance supervisory processes and procedures to assess the adequacy of banks own credit assessment processes and incentivise market participants to develop internal risk management capabilities. Financial Services Commission()/ FSS Amendment of the related law and regulation (Korean banks do not utilize the CRA ratings for their credit assessment purpose. In case of banks using standardised approach, the ratings are used to measure risk weighted assets only. Therefore the amendment might not be necessary for the purpose of reducing the reliance on CRA ratings.) - b) Require or incentivise market participants to disclose information about their internal credit risk assessment processes. The Regulation on Supervision of Banking Business already requires the disclosure of the information -

one year after new inter 3.2 Prudential supervision of banks (Principle III.2) a) Enhance supervisory oversight of banks to ensure they develop adequate internal credit assessment processes that avoid mechanistic reliance on CRA ratings (differentiating where appropriate between banks subject to the internal ratings-based (IRB), Standardised Approach of other capital regime). b) Revise CRA ratings in other prudential supervisory policies (e.g. relating to liquidity requirements) to reduce reliance on CRA ratings. /FSS /FSS Korean banks do not utilize the CRA ratings for their credit assessment purpose. This question does not apply to Korea. In banking supervisory framework in Korea, the CRA ratings are used only for the measurement of risk weighted assets. Other than that, there is no prudential supervisory policy involving the CRA ratings.

Annex II: Central bank operations 3. Application of the basic principles to particular financial market activities (Principle III) inter Based on the findings from the stock-taking exercise, please describe the areas identified as needing changes, including which areas are considered priorities, and the steps authorities intend to take to reduce reliance on CRA ratings in central bank policies and operations. - (Open market operations and lending facilities) CRA ratings are not used. Since OMOs and lending operations were introduced in Korea, the Bank of Korea has never used CRA ratings to determine eligibility of assets in OMOs and lending operations. - (Foreign asset management) CRA ratings are only used when choosing which securities to invest in and in reviewing counterparties. Taking into account that the mechanistic use of CRA ratings could lead to systemic risk in the inter financial markets, the Bank of Korea is strengthening its efforts to reduce its reliance on CRA for the risk management of reserve assets. We are also improving risk management system in an attempt to enhance the capacity of internal credit assessments, for example, by setting exposure limits using internal scoring methodologies. So as to reduce reliance on specific CRAs and to enhance objectivity, we have increased the range of external CRAs and made the process of credit rating decision more reasonable (by applying medium or multiple ratings). We have also introduced internal credit scoring methodologies for managing counterparty credit risk by setting exposure limits on term deposit and corporate holdings. Through monitoring various indicators such as Expected Shortfall, Systemic risk index, we strengthened both tail risk and systemic risk management. We are developing the capability to respond preemptively to the risks which are difficult to manage based upon external

inter credit ratings. We have continually used credit-related market indicators (including CDS, EDF) as supplementary tools for the external credit ratings, while we analyze individual financial statements, stress test result, regulatory impact on our reserve portfolio. Because relying solely on internal evaluation in the presence of a significant discrepancy between internal ratings and CRA ratings may result in unintended signals, the results of internal rating assessment would be used as a supplementary reference. 3.1 Central bank operations (Principle III.1) a) Reduce reliance on CRA ratings in central bank policies (such as investments, asset management frameworks, and conventional and unconventional operations), including the decision to accept or reject an instrument as collateral or for outright purchase and in determining haircuts. The Bank of Korea (Open market operations and lending facilities) CRA ratings are not used. (Foreign asset management) The Bank of Korea is improving its risk management system to strengthen internal credit risk evaluation such as introducing internal scoring methodologies to counterparty exposure limit setting but it also deeply considers some important issues regarding internal credit risk evaluation. First, it is really hard for central banks to surpass the professionalism and credibility of CRA ratings due to insufficient resources and

inter capability. Second, we may give unintended signals to market, if we invest or act solely based on our internal evaluation in the case that there is big discrepancy between result of internal rating and CRA rating. b) Adjust policies for imposing risk control measures (including haircuts) on financial instruments to align with the FSB Principles on CRA ratings. The Bank of Korea (Open market operations and lending facilities) CRA ratings are not used. (Foreign asset management) The Bank of Korea has already avoided mechanistic use of CRA ratings in its investment decision making process by reserving the right to defer selling of the bond in a certain amount of time, for example when a CRA rating of a specific bond decreases below the minimum investible rating.

inter c) Develop the central bank s internal credit risk assessment capabilities and use of alternative measures of creditworthiness. The Bank of Korea (Open market operations and lending facilities) Eligible counterparties are already selected based on an internal credit assessment, using public and non-public information. (Foreign asset management) The Bank of Korea has already developed internal credit scoring system for putting exposure limits on the term deposit counterparties and is also reviewing to introduce internal credit risk assessment system as a supplementary tool for credit risk management. Under review

Annex III: Insurance/Reinsurance Companies 1 1. Reducing reliance on CRA ratings in laws and regulations (Principle I) inter Based on the findings from the stock-taking exercise, please describe the areas identified as needing change and those areas considered priorities, as well as the steps authorities intend to take to reduce reliance on CRA ratings in laws and regulations. In addition, authorities should describe the incentives put in place for market participants to develop their own independent credit assessment processes. Examples of incentives might include disclosure requirements relating to credit risk assessment practices or articulating clear supervisory expectations of the extent to which firms should perform their own due diligence before making lending or investment decisions. - We are reviewing RBC internal-model adoption as part of our long term initiatives. Once this is introduced, each insurance company will develop its own credit assessment process. a) Remove references to CRA ratings in laws and regulations relating to insurance/reinsurance companies. Revised relevant regulations to require all reinsurance contracts to meet not only CRA rating standards but also financial prudential standards stipulated by domestic and overseas supervisory authorities. 2012 1 Answers in this section should relate to the prudential regulation of insurance companies and reinsurance companies. Laws and regulations relating to insurance companies in their capacity as institutional investors should be included in the section entitled Investment Funds Management.

b) Develop alternative standards of credit assessment, where needed, for the purpose of replacing references to CRA ratings in laws and regulations relating to insurance/reinsurance companies. FSS 2. Reducing market reliance on CRA ratings (Principle II) a) Enhance supervisory processes and procedures to assess the adequacy of insurers /reinsurers own credit assessment processes and incentivise market participants to develop internal risk management capabilities. b) Require or incentivise market participants to disclose information about their internal credit risk assessment processes. FSS Reviewing adoption of RBC internal model as part of our long term initiatives. Planning to reduce reliance on CRA ratings by adopting internal RBC model. Revised relevant regulations to require all reinsurance contracts to meet not only CRA rating standards but also financial prudential standards stipulated by domestic and overseas supervisory authorities. inter 2012 2012

Annex IV: Investment Funds Management (including collective investment schemes, alternative investment schemes, occupational retirement schemes) 1. Reducing reliance on CRA ratings in laws and regulations (Principle I) completion date inter Based on the findings from the stock-taking exercise, please describe the areas identified as needing change and those areas considered priorities, as well as the steps authorities intend to take to reduce reliance on CRA ratings in laws and regulations. In addition, authorities should describe the incentives put in place for market participants to develop their own independent credit assessment processes. Examples of incentives might include disclosure requirements relating to credit risk assessment practices. Developing alternative standards and internal model within asset management companies in pursuit of reducing CRA reliance would result in excessive cost which will likely be imposed to its subscribers as, in most cases, fees. Thus we believe this is inappropriate. Retirement pension fund can only be invested in products with simple structure such as investment grade bonds and listed stocks while it is prohibited to be invested in derivatives/structured products that may spur systemic risks. Therefore, retirement pension fund would not cause spill-over of systemic risks. Korea will continue to closely monitor any movements in the inter arena for developing appropriate alternative standards. a) Remove references to CRA ratings in laws and Do not have any plan to remove references regulations for investment funds management.

b) Develop alternative standards of credit assessment, where needed, for the purpose of replacing references to CRA ratings in laws and regulations for investment funds management. 2. Reducing market reliance on CRA ratings (Principle II) a) Enhance supervisory processes and procedures to assess the adequacy of market participants own credit assessment processes. Do not have any plan to develop alternative standards 3. Application of the basic principles to particular financial market activities (Principle III.3) completion date inter a) Establish, as appropriate, supervisory review of internal limits and investment policies of investment managers and institutional investors. a. Insurance companies (in their capacity as institutional investors) b. Investment managers (i.e. mangers of collective investment schemes). c. Alternative investment managers (e.g. hedge funds, endowments). /FSS Monitor compliance with regulation on asset management methodologies and ratio as well as adequacy of internal decisionmaking process on making investments

d. Managers of occupational retirement schemes. /FSS b) Require changes to internal limits and investment policies. a. Insurance companies (in their capacity as institutional investors) b. Investment managers (i.e. mangers of collective investment schemes). c. Alternative investment managers (e.g. hedge funds, endowments). d. Managers of occupational retirement schemes. c) Incentivise compliance with the CRA Principles. a. Insurance companies (in their capacity as institutional investors) /FSS Direct investment on both domestic and overseas junk bonds is prohibited If an insurance company fails to comply with the asset management methodologies and ratio stipulated in the Insurance Business Act, the may take following measures in accordance with the article 134 of the same Act: completion date inter

b. Investment managers (i.e. mangers of collective investment schemes). c. Alternative investment managers (e.g. hedge funds, endowments). d. Managers of occupational retirement schemes. /FSS 1. corrective order for the relevant violation; 2. caution and warning to the insurance company, or request for a caution, warning or reprimand to its executives and employees. Investment is permitted only in investment grade bonds. completion date inter d) Strengthen supervisory oversight to assess whether investments managers and institutional investors have made changes to the role that CRA ratings play in investment mandates, thresholds and triggers. a. Insurance companies (in their capacity as institutional investors) b. Investment managers (i.e. mangers of collective investment schemes).

completion date inter c. Alternative investment managers (e.g. hedge funds, endowments). d. Managers of occupational retirement schemes.

Annex V: Collateral Policies for Central Counterparties (CCPs) inter Based on the findings from the stock-taking exercise, please describe the areas identified as needing change and those areas considered priorities, as well as the steps authorities intend to take to reduce reliance on CRA ratings in laws and regulations. In addition, authorities should describe the incentives put in place for market participants to develop their own independent credit assessment processes. Examples of incentives might include disclosure requirements relating to credit risk assessment practices or articulating clear supervisory expectations of the extent to which CCPs should perform their own due diligence. 1. Reducing reliance on CRA ratings in laws and regulations (Principle I) a) Remove references to CRA ratings in laws and regulations relating to collateral policies for CCPs.

b) Develop alternative standards of credit assessment, where necessary, for the purpose of replacing references to CRA ratings in laws and regulations relating to collateral policies for CCPs. 2. Reducing market reliance on CRA ratings (Principle II) a) Enhance supervisory processes and procedures to assess the adequacy of CCPs own credit assessment processes. 3. Application of the basic principles to particular financial market activities (Principle III) 3.1 Central counterparties and private sector margin agreements (Principle III.4a) a) Conduct stress tests or estimate the procyclical effect, on the overall margin requirements for the CCP participants, of a sudden downgrade of the credit ratings of some widely used securities. b) Assess the reliance on credit ratings in the investment policy of the CCP. c) Review private sector margin agreements to ensure compliance with the Principle. inter

inter d) Require changes to private sector margin agreements. e) Incentivise compliance with the CRA Principles.

Annex VI: Securities Issuance (debt and equity, whether public issuance or private placement), including assetbacked securities and corporate debt inter Based on the findings from the stock-taking exercise, please describe the areas identified as needing change and those areas considered priorities, as well as the steps authorities intend to take to reduce reliance on CRA ratings in laws and regulations. In addition, authorities should describe the incentives put in place for market participants to develop their own independent credit assessment processes. Examples of incentives might include disclosure requirements relating to credit risk assessment practices. 1. Reducing reliance on CRA ratings in laws and regulations (Principle I) a) Remove references to CRA ratings in laws and regulations related to securities issuance. CRA rating is required in the securities declaration form submitted to the when issuing unsecured corporate bonds, as a way to provide minimum level of investor protection. Considering the nature of securities, we are taking careful steps in making decision on whether to remove references to CRA. Review in process

b) Develop alternative standards of credit assessment, where necessary, for the purpose of replacing references to CRA ratings in laws and regulations relating to securities issuance. 2. Reducing market reliance on CRA ratings (Principle II) a) Enhance supervisory processes and procedures to assess the adequacy of market participants own credit assessment processes. Due Diligence Best Practice for Financial Institutions has been implemented in February 2012. Will further review when detailed inter standards are set. Require market participants to have internal control system and experts in place necessary for the implementation of due diligence. It is also required to disclose details on implementation of due diligence and its results. Will further review when detailed inter standards are set. inter

3. Application of the basic principles to particular financial market activities (Principle III) 3.1 Central counterparties and private sector margin agreements (Principle III.5a) a) Review the role of credit rating in disclosures by CRA rating is required in the securities issuers of securities. declaration form that is submitted to the when issuing unsecured corporate bonds, in order to protect investors. b) Reduce the role of credit ratings in disclosures by issuers of securities (list the steps to take). Considering the nature of unsecured corporate bonds, investor protection and financial institution s capacity to conduct due diligence should be enhanced prior to reducing the role of credit ratings. inter

Annex VII: Securities Firms (broker-dealers) Milestones to be met (e.g. changes in inter standards) inter Based on the findings from the stock-taking exercise, please describe the areas identified as needing change and those areas considered priorities, as well as the steps authorities intend to take to reduce reliance on CRA ratings in laws and regulations. In addition, authorities should describe the incentives put in place for market participants to develop their own independent credit assessment processes. 1. Reducing reliance on CRA ratings in laws and regulations (Principle I) a) Remove references to CRA ratings in laws and regulations relating to securities firms. CRA rating is referred to when calculating the risk of financial investment companies in order for prudential supervision and investor protection. Careful steps need to be taken before removing references to CRA ratings. Prior to making such movements it is important to: Strengthen investor protection tools such as eliminating sources of conflict of interest with the investors, so that mis-selling is eradicated. Review in process

b) Develop alternative standards of credit assessment, where necessary, for the purpose of replacing references to CRA ratings in laws and regulations relating to securities firms. 2. Reducing market reliance on CRA ratings (Principle II) a) Enhance supervisory processes and procedures to assess the adequacy of securities firms own credit assessment processes. Milestones to be met (e.g. changes in inter standards) Have domestic credit rating market be fully established Have more competent internal credit assessment processes of securities companies. Korea s legal framework only allows references to CRA ratings while not taking account ratings from unauthorized agencies. It is important to revise regulations on credit rating business together with developing alternative standards. Will further review when detailed inter standards are set. It is important to revise regulations on credit rating business together with developing alternative standards. inter Review in process Review in process