Petroleum Economic Concepts

Similar documents
Field Development Plan. Jan Bygdevoll Discipline leader Reservoir Engineering Norwegian Petroleum Directorate Manila 7.

STATE ORGANISATION OF PETROLEUM ACTIVITIES

8 Economic considerations, deliveries and employment

Norwegian tax regime for petroleum exploration - Case No 81036

Norway Sovereignty over the petroleum resources Ownership and title to the underground petroleum resources

Framework and organization

Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative Cash flows from the petroleum industry in Norway 2013

Legal framework governing upstream investments

A long-term investor in global markets:

No.: 071 Established: Revision no.: 2 Rev. date: Page: 2

Report on the management of Norges Bank s foreign exchange reserves Third quarter 2011

Petoro Årsrapport 2011 Kapittelnavn. Figures FOR 2011

Statoil's second quarter 2010 net operating income was NOK 26.6 billion, compared to NOK 24.3 billion in the second quarter of 2009.

Petoro Årsrapport 2012 Kapittelnavn. figures

Johan Sverdrup Development. The most important Norwegian industrial project over the next 80 years. June WF12033 p

PETROLEUM INDUSTRY REFORM IN NIGERIA: SIMULATION ANALYSIS OF ITS IMPACT ON DEEPWATER E&P ECONOMICS

OIL AND GAS IN NORWAY AN INTRODUCTION JANUARY Advokatfirmaet BAHR AS

Petroleum management in Norway

The Norwegian Experience

Report on the management of Norges Bank s foreign exchange reserves First quarter 2012

Nuna Torok Development Royalty Modification

How To Set Up An Automatic Ownership Reversion

Financial statements and review. 2nd quarter 2010

Generating Extractive Industry Revenues

SEB Investment Grade Seminar 2 September Morten Færevåg, Vice President, Head of Capital Markets

Petroleum law Spring 2011 licensing 2

Implementing Mexico's Energy Reform. Luis Fernando Herrera Deputy General Director of Hydrocarbons Administration

Promotion of Frontier areas Effective communication

SPE Seminar: Introduction to E&P. Economics & Commercial. November 21 st, Lamé Verre Halliburton. All rights reserved.

North Sea Two Futures

Guidance note 18: SOE participation in EITI Reporting

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2017 SOLVEIG GAS GROUP

Taxation of natural resources: principles and policy issues

Click to edit Master title style. Evaluating Fiscal Regimes for Resource Projects: An Example from Oil Development. Click to edit Master text styles

Exploration and Development Strategies Governments Role. Assistant Director General Mr. Gaute Erichsen

Taiwo Ogunleye, Ph.D

SUPREME COURT OF NORWAY

IDENTIFYING AND QUANTIFYING RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES IN DEVELOPING AN OFFSHORE OILFIELD UNDER VARYING OIL PRICE REGIMES

Financial statements and review 3rd quarter 2011

Overview of UK Offshore Oil and Gas Regulation. Andrew Taylor Head, Offshore Environmental Inspectorate DECC Energy Development Unit February 2016

Recent Developments in Production Forecasting and Optimisation Methods

Canadian Developments in Oil and Gas Taxation

Reporting petroleum Reserves & Resources

FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY

The Norwegian Model: Evolution, Performance and Bene ts

OIL AND GAS IN NORWAY AN INTRODUCTION

Guidelines for completing the reporting file

Fall Energy Resources

Financial statements and review 4th quarter 2011

Investment allocation with capital constraints.

ANNUAL Financial statements 20-F. 2nd quarter 2013

LET S TALK ABOUT NORWAY

The Legal and Regulatory Frame-Work for Petroleum Industry In Sudan

Parallel Roundtable 2: Fiscal Regimes and Legal Reform to Attract Investment in the Energy Sector. Background Paper

London Investor Update November 2015

2013 MARGINAL FIELD BID ROUND

Gabriel Zeitouni, COWI A/S

PROBABLISTIC EVALUATION OF ONSHORE MARGINALOIL FIELDS DEVELOPMENT IN NIGERIA

Garage case: Simulation Example

International Taxation of Oil and Gas and Other Mining Activities

Report for first quarter 2007

PROPOSED ACQUISITION OF STAG OILFIELD

Norwegian Asset Accounts Oil and Gas

Managing oil revenues Norway s experience

Lundin Petroleum Corporate Presentation

FORM F1 STATEMENT OF RESERVES DATA AND OTHER OIL AND GAS INFORMATION. Oil and Gas Reserves and Net Present Value of Future Net Revenue

Permex Petroleum Limited Partnership

2017 Financial Results 28 March 2018

NEWS RELEASE. Fort Knox Gilmore project feasibility study highlights 1

Jameleddine Kasbi. Fatma Medhioub

OIL AND GAS RESERVES AND NET PRESENT VALUE OF FUTURE NET REVENUE

General Maritime Corporation. Jefferies 2 nd Annual Shipping Conference

Addendum to the MPRA containing all compiled revisions and additions to be further incorporated

A random walk in the Bakken Oil prices, investment and energy policy

2nd quarter and dno asa 1st half 2002

Capital rationing. A threat to energy security. Magne Emhjellen* and Petter Osmundsen*** * Petoro ** University of Stavanger

GEOPARK ANNOUNCES RECORD CERTIFIED 2P OIL AND GAS RESERVES OF 143 MMBOE - VALUED AT NPV10 $1.9 BILLION

Conducting oil and gas activities in Tanzania

The future of electricity transmission regulation

Permex Petroleum Limited Partnership PRODUCTION FOCUSED CASH FLOW DRIVEN

Risk Levels on the Norwegian Continental Shelf

CANADIAN NATURAL RESOURCES LIMITED ANNOUNCES 2016 YEAR END RESERVES CALGARY, ALBERTA FEBRUARY 14, 2017 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

PRELIMINARY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2016

CHOA Fall Business Conference Jared Wynveen Associate

Fiscal Regime Changes for Maximizing Oil Recovery from offshore continental shelf oilfields

Financial statements and review 3rd quarter 2012

Guidance note on the OGA s fees and charges regime

(Last amended 18 December 2017, cf. page 4)

Frequently Asked Questions

Indicative Viability Calculator for Facilitation of Prospective Bidders

Point Resources Holding AS Second quarter Second quarter Quarterly report Point Resources Holding AS

FIRST INTERIM REPORT FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2005

Press release 25 July SECOND QUARTER RESULTS. Statoil's second quarter 2013 operating and financial review. Second quarter results 2013

Midterm 2 Practice Problems

1. Traditional investment theory versus the options approach

GEOPARK ANNOUNCES 2016 WORK AND INVESTMENT GUIDELINES

GOVERNMENT MEMORANDUM On the Petroleum Industry Bill, Explanatory Memorandum

Chapter 8. Fundamentals of Capital Budgeting

Evaluation of real options in an oil field

Financial Strategy First Test

Transcription:

Petroleum Economic Concepts by Morten Pedersen, NPD, 04.09.03 Agenda 1. Different elements in the economic evaluations of petroleum projects 2. How to deal with uncertainty 3. The different objectives of the NPD 4. Economic analysis in the NPD

Different elements in the economic evaluations of petroleum projects What are the main economic characteristics of the offshore petroleum industry? Large upfront investments Long project period Large price variations Different elements in the economic evaluations of petroleum projects What are the main economic characteristics of the Norwegian petroleum industry? High operation costs High transportation costs High tax rate High profitability!

Different elements in the economic evaluations of petroleum projects What are the main elements in an economic evaluation? Production profiles Prices Investments Operation and maintenance costs Transportation and processing tariffs Removal costs Production profiles Prod rate (Mill bbl/year) 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Different cash-flows Different production strategy gives different productions profiles Time

Oil price prognosis Oil price prognosis 40 35 30 25 $/bbl 20 15 10 5 0 1975 1978 1981 1984 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 2014 2017 2020 Oil price prognosis What should be the basis for the oil price prognosis? Supply capacity and demand prognosis? Opec statements? Price growth? (non renewable resource) Mean reverting price between price floor and price roof?

Gas price prognosis Gas price 120 100 øre/sm3 80 60 40 20 0 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 Gas price prognosis What should be the basis for the gas price prognosis? A link between oil and gas price A link to electricity prices? Long term TOP contracts? Gas to gas competition with third party access in offshore and onshore pipelines?

Investments Development solution Development cost Investments What alternatives exists? Phasing of investments or upfront investment in spare capacity (economics of scale)? Use of existing infrastructure and processing capacity or standalone development? Pre-drilling of production wells? Invest, rent or lease?

Operation and maintenance costs What should be the basis for the operation and maintenance costs? Percentage of the investments Costs per unit produced Estimated costs based on historical data Estimated costs based on future cost reductions. Transportation and processing tariffs What should be the basis for the estimated transportation and processing tariffs? Negotiated tariffs or marginal costs? Long term marginal cost (replacement cost ) or short term marginal cost? Tariff as shipper less income as owner? New regulator new prices (Gassco)

Removal cost What installations will be removed at what cost? Removal cost is shared between the oil companies and the authorities based on previous tax payments. Uncertain if large concrete platform and pipelines shall be removed or left at site. Also uncertain if reuse or scrapping is required. Cash flow Cash in flows (revenues) 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0-200 -400-600 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 years Cash out flows (expenditures)

2. How to deal with uncertainty All elements in the deterministic cash flow analysis are supposed to be expected values. The price uncertainty is the most important one, and also most difficult to diversify. The uncertainty for the other elements in the the concept evaluations is also important They influence on the optimal concept choice and optimal production strategy. 2. How to deal with uncertainty The sensitivity chart gives a good indication of which element is most important for the net present value of the project. Be aware that it is not possible to add all the effects.

Sensitivity charts Project sensitivity Net Present Value 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 Production Oil price Investment 0-20 % -10 % 0 % 10 % 20 % Sensitivity charts The sensitivity chart gives no indication how the uncertainty is distributed. Both the cost and the reserves most likely have an asymmetric distribution. This means that an increase of X % has not the same probability as a reduction of X %.

Probability distribution Probability Assymmetric distribution 80/20 a b c 20/80 Investment, a: most probably (base case) Reserves, b: median (50/50 estimate) etc c: expected value 2. How to deal with uncertainty When the probability distributions are available, more sophisticated analysis can be done. But do not forget that the decision takers have to understand the analysis.

3. The different objectives of the NPD NPD has different objectives: Owner Valuation of the resources Regulator and controller Resource management Market failure Tax collector NPD as an owner Economic valuation of assets Valuation of the petroleum wealth each year for planning purposes. Licensing rounds SDFI shares in licences. Largest shares in licences that are expected to be most profitable. Sale of SDFI assets / caretaker (Petoro)

NPD as a regulator and controller Approving PDOs (Plan for Development and Operation of oil and gas fields) Approving PIOs (Plan for Installation and Operation of pipeline/infrastructure) Preparing area studies Evaluation of major production decisions Increased oil recovery (IOR) projects Abandonment and removal NPD as a tax collector Company tax (28%) Special petroleum tax (50%) Royalty Area fee CO 2 fee NPD collects royalty, area fee and the CO 2 fee NPD calculates the effect of changes in the tax system and the tax level

4. Economic analysis in the NPD The need for economic analysis in the future, is mainly caused by conflicting interests: Ownership-structure: Different planning horizons Taxation Safety & work environment Conflicting interest(continued): Different discount rates Monopolistic behaviour Asymmetrical information Materiality (the size of the project) Environmental issues

Economic assumptions in the NPD Today we use 7 % discount rate (on real values) and pre tax analysis. The CO 2 tax is used as an environmental cost. The use of paid transportation and processing tariffs or calculated costs in the economic analysis has been under constant discussion. Even if the tariffs are supervised by the Ministry of petroleum and energy some of them include a considerable profit element (Gassco tariffs are regulated to 7% return on investments + OPEX) Economic measures of profitability The NPD has up to now used a combination of NPV, break-even price and sensitivity analysis. For the future the NPD will include a risk element in the discount rate. This implies that risk is growing exponential by time. To limit this effect we are investigating the possibility of using a lower discount rate on cost and tariffs compared to revenues.

Break-even price P Oil = NPV(costs) / NPV (production) = NPV(costs) / (NPV oil + c 1 *NPV gas +c 2 NPV NGLl )...where: NPV = T X t ( ) (1 + r) t t = 0 X t - the net cash flow in time t ( =incomecosts) r - discount rate T - number of time periods c 1 constant link factor between oil and gas prices