INTRODUCTION TO NATURAL HAZARD ANALYSIS

Similar documents
Contents. Introduction to Catastrophe Models and Working with their Output. Natural Hazard Risk and Cat Models Applications Practical Issues

An Introduction to Natural Catastrophe Modelling at Twelve Capital. Dr. Jan Kleinn Head of ILS Analytics

QUICK GUIDE. An Introduction to COPE Data. Copyright 2017 AssetWorks Inc. All Rights Reserved. For more information visit,

Casualty Actuaries of the Northwest: Strategies for Homeowners Profitability and Growth

AGENDA RISK MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS REINSURANCE IMPLICATIONS CATASTROPHE MODELING OVERVIEW GUY CARPENTER

Sensitivity Analyses: Capturing the. Introduction. Conceptualizing Uncertainty. By Kunal Joarder, PhD, and Adam Champion

FUTURE FLOODS: An exploration of a cross-disciplinary approach to flood risk forecasting. Brad Weir: Catastrophe Models

Flood Solutions. Summer 2018

NATURAL DISASTER RESPONSE

Catastrophe Models: Learning from Superstorm Sandy

AIRCURRENTS: NEW TOOLS TO ACCOUNT FOR NON-MODELED SOURCES OF LOSS

GEO CODING IN NAT CAT UNDERWRITING. 2. Part I: CRESTA in NAT Cat Underwriting. 3. Part II: NATHAN in NAT Cat Underwriting

Fundamentals of Catastrophe Modeling. CAS Ratemaking & Product Management Seminar Catastrophe Modeling Workshop March 15, 2010

Geointelligence for your business

Less Risky Business. In Catastrophe Planning, Location Intelligence Combined with Superior Data Can Mitigate Exposure and Improve Risk Management

Flood Risk Valuation Flood Model Evaluation and Risk Pricing Evaluation

Stop WINING : Property Data and CAT Modeling: See the Light, Get it Right!

SOUTH CENTRAL REGION MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN. Advisory Committee Meeting September 12, 2012

A. Purpose and status of Information Note 2. B. Background 2. C. Applicable standards and other materials 3

Assessing and Managing Risk of Natural Disasters for a Workplace

Hazard Mitigation Planning

CL-3: Catastrophe Modeling for Commercial Lines

Proposal Form Erection All Risks Insurance

AIR Worldwide Analysis: Exposure Data Quality

The AIR Typhoon Model for South Korea

Questionnaire and Proposal for Erection All Risks Insurance

IAA Risk Book Chapter 5 - Catastrophe Risk Karen Clark Vijay Manghnani Hsiu-Mei Chang

PHASE 2 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT

IMIA Working Group Paper [WGP 99 (16)] IMIA Annual Conference 2016, Qatar October Natural Catastrophe Modelling for Construction Risks

NATURAL PERILS - PREPARATION OR RECOVERY WHICH IS HARDER?

Natural Hazards Risks in Kentucky. KAMM Regional Training

The Global Risk Landscape. RMS models quantify the impacts of natural and human-made catastrophes for the global insurance and reinsurance industry.

RULES AND PROCEDURES FOR SUBMITTING APPLICATIONS

A Practical Framework for Assessing Emerging Risks

VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

ACTUARIAL FLOOD STANDARDS

ICRM Seminar 2014General

Deciphering Flood: A Familiar and Misunderstood Risk

MEETING THE GROWING NEED FOR TALENT IN CATASTROPHE MODELING & RISK MANAGEMENT

The AIR Inland Flood Model for Great Britian

AIR s 2013 Global Exceedance Probability Curve. November 2013

LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW WORKSHEET FEMA REGION 2 Jurisdiction: Jurisdiction: Title of Plan: Date of Plan: Address:

THE EVOLUTION OF CATASTROPHE MODELS AND

RISK MANAGEMENT NEXT GENERATION

Survey of Hazus-MH: FEMA s Tool for Natural Hazard Loss Estimation

STATE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INC.

2015 AEG Professional Landslide Forum February 26-28, 2015

Questionnaire and Proposal for Erection All Risks Insurance No

Garfield County NHMP:

2015 Mobile County, Alabama Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Appendices

Quantifying Riverine and Storm-Surge Flood Risk by Single-Family Residence: Application to Texas

Catastrophe Risk Engineering Solutions

PROPOSAL FORM FOR INSURANCE AGAINST ERECTION ALL RISKS 1. FULL NAME OF PROPOSER ADDRESS...TELEPHONE NO TRADE OR BUSINESS...FAX NO...

Canadian Institute of Actuaries Conference CATASTROPHE MODELING 2012 AND BEYOND JUNE 21, Sherry Thomas Krista Lienau

French Protection Covers Against Natural Disasters. P. Tinard Sr. Cat Modeler R&D Technical Studies Public Reinsurance

Source: NOAA 2011 NATURAL CATASTROPHE YEAR IN REVIEW

Southwest Florida Healthcare Coalition

RiskTopics. Guide to flood emergency response plans September 2017

Managing Typhoon. South Korea s Typhoon Climatology. by Dr. Peter Sousounis, Dr. Mary Louie, Dr. Cagdas Kafali, and Mr.

NAR Brief MILLIMAN FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY

The AIR Institute's Certified Extreme Event Modeler Program MEETING THE GROWING NEED FOR TALENT IN CATASTROPHE MODELING & RISK MANAGEMENT

Pre-Earthquake, Emergency and Contingency Planning August 2015

LOCAL MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW CROSSWALK

Fundamentals of Risk Analysis and Risk Reduction

OREGON MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY PERSONAL PROTECTOR POLICY PROGRAM PREMIUMS. Step Forms 3 and 5 Premium or Factor Rounding

Policyholder Insurance Webinar Series: Covering Hurricane Loss for Commercial Insureds

2015 International Workshop on Typhoon and Flood- APEC Experience Sharing on Hazardous Weather Events and Risk Management.

CATASTROPHE MODELLING

Helping to Avert Catastrophe

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTION ABOUT FLOODPLAINS Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

Canada s exposure to flood risk. Who is affected, where are they located, and what is at stake

1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 APPROACH

Community Rating System. National Flood Insurance Program

Mark Brannon, FCAS, MAAA, CPCU Sue Buehler, FCAS, MAAA

Flood: How to Protect Your Business from a Natural Disaster

Climate Change and The Built Environment

Village of Blue Mounds Annex

TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW...1 BINDING AUTHORITY...1 ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA...2 COVERAGE LIMITS.3 COVERAGES.3-4 LOSS SETTLEMENT 5-7 MID-TERM CHANGES..

Managing the Risk of Catastrophes: Protecting Critical Infrastructure in Urban Areas

Wildfire and Flood Hazards, Using GIS Tools to Assess Risk

MUNICIPAL EXCESS LIABILITY JOINT INSURANCE FUND 9 Campus Drive, Suite 216 Parsippany, NJ Telephone (201) BULLETIN MEL 17-03

SECTION 6 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

Flood Risk Assessment in the

TESTIMONY. Association of State Floodplain Managers, Inc.

Talk Components. Wharton Risk Center & Research Context TC Flood Research Approach Freshwater Flood Main Results

GUIDE BUSINESS & INDUSTRY A STEP-BY-STEP APPROACH TO EMERGENCY PLANNING, RESPONSE AND RECOVERY FOR COMPANIES OF ALL SIZES

Pioneer ILS Interval Fund

Flood Insurance THE TOPIC OCTOBER 2012

RULES AND PROCEDURES FOR SUBMITTING APPLICATIONS

Understanding Uncertainty in Catastrophe Modelling For Non-Catastrophe Modellers

A Multihazard Approach to Building Safety: Using FEMA Publication 452 as a Mitigation Tool

UNDERSTANDING UNCERTAINTY IN CATASTROPHE MODELLING FOR NON-CATASTROPHE MODELLERS

APPENDIX 1 FEMA MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAMS

The effect of adverse weather on construction sites

Questionnaire and proposal for contractors all risks insurance No.

WATER EXCLUSION ENDORSEMENT

DeSoto Parish Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Kick-off Meeting. February 16, 2016 Grand Cane, LA

Disaster Recovery Planning: Preparation is Key to Survival

VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

NFIP Program Basics. KAMM Regional Training

Transcription:

INTRODUCTION TO NATURAL HAZARD ANALYSIS November 19, 2013 Thomas A. Delorie, Jr. CSP Managing Director

Natural Hazards Are Global and Include: Earthquake Flood Hurricane / Tropical Cyclone / Typhoon Landslides Severe Convective Storm (Tornado, Hail & Straight line winds) Sinkholes Tsunami Volcano Wildfire 1

Munich Re Nathan Map of Global Natural Hazards 2

2008 USGS United States Earthquake Seismic Hazard Map 3

Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program Map 4

United States Flood Exposure USGS and FEMA 5

Hurricane / Tropical Cyclone / Typhoon 6

7

United States Landslide Exposure 8

61 Years of Tornado Tracks, 1950-2011 NOAA and IDVsolutions 9

Noted Shift of Tornado Alley and Severity 10

Munich Re Nathan Global Tornado Hazard 11

Munich Re Nathan Global Hailstorm Hazard 12

Sinkholes Form in Karst Terrain - USGS Map of Karst Terrain 13

United States Tsunami Events - USGS 14

Global Tsunami Sources NOAA 1650 BC - 2010 AD 15

United States Volcano Activity and Hazards - USGS 16

United States Wildfire Hazard USGS 17

Munich Re Nathan Global Wildfire Hazard 18

Which Natural Hazards Can Be Modeled There are three major natural hazard modeling companies RMS AIR EQECAT Marsh has global licenses for RMS and AIR covering: Earthquake Hurricane / Cyclone / Typhoon Severe Convective Storm (tornado, hail, straight line winds) - RMS can model all three perils together or each one separately - AIR can only model all three perils together Wildfire California only, by AIR 19

Global Flood Model Coverage vs Recent Flood Events 20

So What About Flood Modeling? Some river flood models exist for the United States and parts of Europe, but they are not recommended for the following reasons. Geographical resolution not detailed enough to account for changes in elevation on a site. Not capable of manually entering finished floor elevation Not capable of allocating values among multiple floors Recommend single site analysis - First validate exposure, then evaluate: Flood Zone Determination from Marsh Flood Zone Service Center Pictometry to determine if all or portion of parcel is in a flood zone If building(s) exposed to flooding, perform on-site analysis - Require site to obtain elevation certificate to identify finished floor elevation and 100 year flood elevation - Obtain regional Flood Insurance Study from FEMA to provide background and possibly the 500 year flood elevation 21

What Are the Benefits of Natural Hazard Modeling? Assist clients in quantifying their exposure and understanding carrier exposure Analysis used to make informed decisions on deductibles and limits Educate upper management and other key stakeholders on exposure and options Identify which locations are driving the natural hazard premium Focus on validating and/or enhancing data quality at these site to ensure most accurate picture and increase confidence in analysis Support other risk management objectives Business continuity planning Supply chain analysis 22

History of Modeling Deterministic maximum historical event Did not include probability of loss Did not include other event to impact entire portfolio Maximum credible probabilistic event (MFL) Usually has a very large return period and $$ amount Probabilistic portfolio analysis Incorporates all possible events Includes a wide range of return periods and average annual loss This is the current approach 23

General Modeling Limitations Earthquake damage and financial impact pertain exclusively to: Damage caused directly by earthquake induced ground motion Primary property damage and associated contents/inventory damage Fire following and sprinkler leakage usually not included in property earthquake limit Business interruption (loss of use) Hurricane damage and financial impact pertain exclusively to: Damage caused directly by hurricane induced wind forces, including wind driven rain Primary property damage and associated contents/inventory damage Storm surge usually included with flood, not named storm definition Business interruption (loss of use) 24

Additional General Modeling Limitations Damage and financial impact do not include secondary damage from: Fire and explosion - Fire following and sprinkler leakage could be included in earthquake modeling if desired Flooding, such as from a tsunami, or failure of flood protective device (dam, levee, sea wall, etc.) Storm surge could be included in hurricane modeling if desired Interdependencies, contingent business interruption Liabilities, fines, fees, pollution, extra expense Governmental action, code revisions, constructive loss Property of others, worker s compensation cost General liability losses by a third party 25

Key Parameters Impacting Earthquake Damage Building construction Load bearing structural details (what is holding up roof and floors above grade) Year built (determines what building code was in effect) Number of stories Occupancy Distance to fault Soil conditions At fault and at site Between fault and site 26

Key Parameter Impacting Hurricane Damage Building construction Building shell - Wall construction and coating (such as stucco) - Window impact resistance ratings Year built (determines what building code was in effect) Number of stories Occupancy Distance to coast Ground terrain roughness 27

Minimum Required Information Required information Building, contents and business interruption values by building/location Location information to geocode (accurately position building) - US Street address including zip code (latitude and longitude preferred) - International Latitude and longitude in decimal format (otherwise may only geocode to postal code centroid) Occupancy Critical; used to fill in missing construction features Details on how deductibles are applied, if used in analysis Storm surge included or excluded? - Normally excluded in modeling since included as part of flood sublimit Fire following and sprinkler leakage included or excluded? - Normally excluded in modeling since not part of earthquake sublimit Other special requests 28

Additional Required Information Primary Construction Characteristics Building structural load bearing construction Structural members holding up roof and floors above (do not use fire resistive, noncombustible, etc.) Number of stories Year built or last major structural upgrade (building code upgrade date, not date of remodel) Secondary construction characteristics (only considered if all primary construction characteristics and occupancy provided) If detailed construction not available or complete, model uses average construction for specific occupancy, usually in same in zip code region Does not default to worst case May be better or worse compared to actual 29

What are the deliverables from modeling? Aggregate Exceeding Probabilities (AEP) Probability loss level will be exceeded by one or more events in a year Used to choose an annual aggregate limit (earthquakes) Occurrence Exceeding Probabilities (OEP) Probability loss level will be exceeded by one event in a year Used to choose an occurrence limit (hurricanes) AEP and OEP Loss levels associated with various return periods (50, 100, 250, 500, 1000, 5000, 10,000 years) Carriers usually underwrite to 250 or 500 year return period Clients generally start and same point, and then move up or down based on budget and availability of limits Average Annual Loss (AAL) for portfolio and by location Portfolio AAL can identify base premium Location AALs can identify premium drivers 30

Sample AEP Output Table RETURN PERIOD YEARS ANNUAL PROBABILITY OF EXCEEDANCE GROUND UP LOSS PROJECTION LOSS PERCENT OF TOTAL VALUES 10,000 0.01% $704,372,931 28.08% 5,000 0.02% $601,641,601 23.98% 2,000 0.05% $429,156,245 17.11% 1,000 0.10% $276,192,780 11.01% 500 0.20% $145,648,003 5.81% 250 0.40% $72,199,511 2.88% 100 1.00% $19,969,705 0.80% 50 2.00% $3,921,388 0.16% 31