GEF-7 REPLENISHMENT DRAFT SUMMARY OF NEGOTIATIONS (PREPARED BY THE SECRETARIAT)

Similar documents
GEF-7 REPLENISHMENT POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS (PREPARED BY THE SECRETARIAT)

GEF-7 REPLENISHMENT: PARTICIPATION, WORK PLAN AND PROPOSED TIMETABLE. GEF/R.7/01/Rev.01 March 20, 2017

ANNOTATED PROVISIONAL AGENDA

Instrument for the Establishment of the Restructured Global Environment Facility. March 2015

Global Environment Facility

Summary of Financial Information As of August 31, (Prepared by the Trustee)

Summary of Financial Information As of December 31, (Prepared by the Trustee)

Summary of Financial Information As of February 28, (Prepared by the Trustee)

Summary of Financial Information As of September 30, (Prepared by the Trustee)

Instrument for the Establishment of the Restructured Global Environment Facility

Global Environment Facility Trust Fund

Global Environment Facility. (Prepared by the Trustee)

SEVENTH GEF REPLENISHMENT: OVERVIEW OF FINANCIAL STRUCTURE (PREPARED BY THE TRUSTEE)

STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT OF THE LDCF PIPELINE

Global Environment Facility

GEF-7 Replenishment: Overview of Financial Structure

DECISION ADOPTED BY THE CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY AT ITS ELEVENTH MEETING

SAICM/ICCM.4/INF/9. Note by the secretariat. Distr.: General 11 August 2015 English only

GEF-6 REPLENISHMENT: FINANCING FRAMEWORK (PREPARED BY THE TRUSTEE)

DECISION ADOPTED BY THE CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY

GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK FOR

The GEF Trustee and its Financial Operations

Overview of Financial Structure

GEF BUSINESS PLAN AND CORPORATE BUDGET FOR FY18

PROPOSAL FOR THE SYSTEM OF TRANSPARENT ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES (STAR) FOR GEF-6

Item 12 of the Provisional Agenda SEVENTH SESSION OF THE GOVERNING BODY. Kigali, Rwanda, 30 October 3 November 2017

Arrangements for the first formal replenishment of the Green Climate Fund

Draft Resolution on the Eleventh Replenishment of IFAD s Resources

Informal note by the co-facilitators final version

Global Environment Facility

Organisation strategy for Sweden s cooperation with the Green Climate Fund for

Strengthening and scaling up the GCF pipeline: establishing strategic programming priorities

Global Environment Facility

GEF-7 REPLENISHMENT GEF-7 RESOURCE ALLOCATION SCENARIOS AND GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS TARGETS (PREPARED BY THE SECRETARIAT)

Revised additional tool under item 8 of the agenda

DRAFT Decision 1/CP.15 (Decision 1/CMP.5 in separate document)

NINETY-SEVENTH MEETING WASHINGTON, D.C. APRIL

Decisions of the Board Eighth Meeting of the Board, October 2014

CRITERIA FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF TRUST FUNDS WITHIN

GEF/C.50/10 May 17, th GEF Council Meeting June 07 09, 2016 Washington, D.C. Agenda Item 16 GEF BUSINESS PLAN AND CORPORATE BUDGET FOR FY17

CBD. Distr. GENERAL. UNEP/CBD/COP/11/1/Add.1/Rev.1 17 August 2012 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH

Basics on climate finance for green growth

GEF-7 REPLENISHMENT INFORMAL NOTE FOR THE SECOND GEF-7 REPLENISHMENT MEETING FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AND SUMMARY OF GEF OPERATIONAL MODALITIES

PERFORMANCE OF THE GEF

CBD. Distr. GENERAL. UNEP/CBD/COP/13/INF/16 31 October 2016 ENGLISH ONLY

Resolutions adopted by the Governing Council at its thirty-eighth session

Summary of the Co-Chairs Strategic Climate Fund Trust Fund Committee Meeting January 27, 2009

RESOURCE MOBILIZATION DECISIONS

Decision 3/CP.17. Launching the Green Climate Fund

Table of Contents. BioCF ISFL 2015 Annual Report

Global Environment Facility

Annotations to the provisional agenda

Moving Towards a 2 0 World: The Role of Climate Funds

Guidance from the twentysecond session of the Conference of the Parties: Co-Chairs proposal

Strategy for Resource Mobilization in Support of the Achievement of the Three Objectives of the Convention on Biological Diversity

IDA15 IDA15 FINANCING FRAMEWORK. International Development Association Resource Mobilization (FRM)

The Addis Ababa Action Agenda of the Third. United Nations Capacity Development Programme on International Tax Cooperation

ILLUSTRATIVE SCENARIOS FOR GEF-5 CONTRIBUTIONS

STATUS REPORT FOR THE LEAST DEVELOPED COUNTRIES FUND

STATUS REPORT FOR THE LEAST DEVELOPED COUNTRIES FUND

Report of the Standing Committee on Finance

Policies for Contributions to the Green Climate Fund: Recommendations by Interested Contributors

FY19 ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET FOR THE LEAST DEVELOPED COUNTRIES FUND AND

Initial Modalities for the Operation of the Fund s Mitigation and Adaptation Windows and its Private Sector Facility

STATUS REPORT FOR THE LEAST DEVELOPED COUNTRIES FUND

Mapping of elements related to project or programme eligibility and selection criteria

Strategies and approaches for long-term climate finance

Proposed Programme of Work and Budget

GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK FOR THE CLEAN TECHNOLOGY FUND. November, 2008

Position paper for the 4 th meeting of the Ad Hoc Open-ended Working Group on Review of Implementation of the Convention, 7-11 May, Montreal.

Special Climate Change Fund (SCCF)

NEXT STEPS FOR CONVERTING INTENDED NATIONALLY DETERMINED CONTRIBUTIONS INTO ACTION

... SUMMARY OF THE 40TH MEETING OF THE GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY COUNCIL: MAY 2011 IN THIS ISSUE.

Indicative Guidelines for Country-Specific Resource Mobilization Strategies

GEF-6 Funding Needs Assessment

MODALITY FOR FUNDING ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES UNDER THE PMR: DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR DISCUSSION. PMR Note PA

GLOBAL - CLIMATE RESILIENCE AND ADAPTATION FINANCE AND TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER FACILITY (CRAFT)

UPDATING THE MINIMUM FIDUCIARY STANDARDS ON ISSUES RELATED TO ANTI- MONEY LAUNDERING AND COMBATING THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM

Chair s Summary Meeting of the Major Economies Forum September 22-23, 2016

Green Climate Fund and the Paris Agreement

Allocation and Catalytic Investment Access to Funding

Fourth Report of the Green Climate Fund to the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

Decision 3/COP.8. The 10-year strategic plan and framework to enhance the implementation of the Convention ( )

Tracks Documentation

Programmatic approach to funding proposals

Ethiopia s Climate Resilient Green Economy (CRGE) Facility Terms of Reference

GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK FOR THE CLEAN TECHNOLOGY FUND

CLIMATE INVESTMENT FUNDS: THE CLEAN TECHNOLOGY FUND AND THE STRATEGIC CLIMATE FUND. Public Disclosure Authorized. Public Disclosure Authorized

GEF BUSINESS PLAN AND CORPORATE BUDGET FOR FY16

Simplified processes for approval of proposals for certain activities, in particular small-scale activities

Synthesis report on the progress made in the implementation of the remaining elements of the least developed countries work programme

COP MOP 2 Agenda Regional Preparatory Meeting. CBD Secretariat Pre-COP Regional Preparatory Meetings August 2016

Follow-up to the financing dialogue

SUBMISSION BY DENMARK AND THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION ON BEHALF OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND ITS MEMBER STATES

CTF-SCF/TFC.4/Inf.2 March 13, Joint Meeting of the CTF and SCF Trust Fund Committees Manila, Philippines March 16, 2010

FCCC/CP/2016/10/Add.1

Matters relating to Article 9 of the Paris Agreement and paragraphs of decision 1/CP.21

3.1. Introduction to the GEF and the LDCF

Additional Criteria and Modality for Allocation of. PMR Implementation Funding

Communiqué G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors Meeting February 2016, Shanghai, China

Transcription:

Fourth Meeting for the Seventh Replenishment of the GEF Trust Fund April 25, 2018 Stockholm, Sweden GEF/R.7/21 April 2, 2018 GEF-7 REPLENISHMENT DRAFT SUMMARY OF NEGOTIATIONS (PREPARED BY THE SECRETARIAT)

SUMMARY OF NEGOTIATIONS 1. Participants to the Seventh Replenishment of the GEF Trust Fund agreed to this Summary of Negotiations for transmittal to the GEF Council, along with the attached documents: Programming Document for the Seventh Replenishment of the GEF Trust Fund (Annex A), Policy Recommendations for the Seventh Replenishment of the GEF Trust Fund (Annex B), and Draft World Bank Resolution No. [ ], Global Environment Facility Trust Fund: Seventh Replenishment of Resources (Annex C). 2. This Summary highlights the main items that were considered during the replenishment negotiations. It is not a comprehensive report of all the detailed discussions that took place during the negotiating process. The discussions at specific meetings are detailed in the Co-Chairs summaries of each replenishment meeting. The Replenishment Process 3. At its October 2016 meeting, the GEF Council requested the Trustee of the Global Environment Facility ( the GEF ), in cooperation with the Chief Executive Officer and Chairperson of the Facility, to initiate discussions on the Seventh replenishment of resources of the GEF Trust Fund ( GEF-7 ) to fund activities during the four- year period from July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2022. 4. Accordingly, the Trustee and the GEF Secretariat initiated the process by circulating a discussion note to prospective Participants regarding participation, proposed timetable and core GEF-7 replenishment topics. Participants agreed on the preliminary schedule of subsequent replenishment meetings. In addition, agreement was reached on the overall work plan for such discussions as well as the arrangements for participation in the replenishment discussions. Participants decided that the meetings would benefit from the participation of non-donor recipient country representatives, one representative for each of the four regional groupings (Africa, Asia, Eastern Europe, Latin America and Caribbean). Participants also agreed that two NGO representatives and two private sector representatives would participate in an observer capacity. The following replenishment meetings were held: March 2017, Paris, France; October 2017, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; January 2018, Brasilia, Brazil; April 2018, Stockholm, Sweden. Sixth Overall Performance Study of the GEF (OPS6) 5. The Independent Evaluation Office prepared OPS6, providing an important context for the discussions. 6. Participants discussed the OPS6 Report and noted the thorough analysis underpinning its findings and recommendations. Participants noted the OPS6 finding that with its broad focus and as a financial mechanism for environmental conventions, the GEF occupies a unique space in the global environmental financing architecture and that the GEF focal area strategies have been responsive to convention guidance. Participants noted the finding that the GEF has a strong track record in delivering overall good project performance, but that the sustainability of outcomes needs further attention. Participants noted that GEF interventions have contributed to reducing

environmental stress and that the GEF has played a catalytic role and supported transformational change primarily through mainstreaming. Participants noted the finding that with their emphasis on integration, programmatic approaches and multifocal area projects are relevant in addressing the drivers of environmental degradation; however, complex program designs have implications for outcomes, efficiency, and management. Participants noted that operational restrictions and lack of awareness of the GEF have resulted in limiting or not fully realizing the potential for successful engagement with the private sector. Participants noted the OPS6 finding that overall, the GEF partnership is well governed while further improvements might be possible in terms of efficiency, accountability, and transparency. Finally, Participants noted that the GEF s policy framework has been strengthened in GEF-6, although further improvements are possible: enhancing work in biodiversity, international waters, chemicals and waste, and land degradation, where there are limited sources of financing and few players; developing a strong, cogent rationale for designing integrated programs and multifocal area projects; strengthening gender mainstreaming in GEF programming and operations in a more systematic manner; strengthening operational governance, including ground rules for cooperation among Agencies; and improving the results-based management system, and knowledge management. Programming Directions 7. Participants considered a proposal for Programming Directions in the Seventh replenishment period to cover four years (FY19 FY22) of GEF operations and activities in its five focal areas and other programming areas. 8. Participants noted that GEF-7 comes at important moment in time. The world s ecosystems, biomes and processes that regulate the stability and resilience of the Earth system are being put under increasing strain, with pressures set to increase in the future unless a major transformation of key economic systems to reduce the global environmental footprint is achieved. Participants also noted the enhanced global momentum through international processes that have been building in recent years, complemented by action from the private sector, sub-national governments, international finance, and other actors. Participants noted the importance of maximizing the potential of the GEF s unique position as financial mechanisms of several multilateral environmental agreements: The GEF occupies a unique space in the global environmental financing architecture derived from its formal mandate as a financing mechanism under several, multilateral environmental agreements: CBD, UNCCD, UNFCCC, the Minamata Convention, the Stockholm Convention, the Montreal Protocol (where the GEF supports countries with economies in transition), in addition to targeted support for transboundary freshwater and marine issues. Participants noted that the work done through the GEF also contributes to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals. Participants welcomed the scope for enhancing the GEF s value-for-money through integrated programming. Participants also noted the GEF s proven record in funding demonstration and pilot activities with a potential for being an incubator to test and refine approaches that can subsequently be funded at larger scale from other sources. Moreover, participants noted that the GEF is well-positioned to provide support for institutional strengthening to help lay the foundation for enhanced action. Participants emphasize the importance of the GEF helping to catalyze private sector action,

building on the successful GEF-6 non-grant instrument pilot illustrated the GEF s potential role in helping unlock private finance for the environment, and building on the GEF s support strengthen the enabling environments for private sector activity. 9. The GEF-7 Programming Directions is attached as Annex A to this Summary. GEF-7 Policy Recommendations 10. To support the programming approach outlined above, Participants agreed on a set of Policy Recommendations for the Seventh Replenishment of the GEF Trust Fund, attached as Annex B to this Summary. 11. The policy recommendations for GEF-7 include: updates to the STAR allocation methodology, including measures to address the particular needs of the poorest and most vulnerable GEF-recipient countries; optimizing the use of GEF resources in different countries with a view to mobilizing greater investments in measures to achieve global environmental benefits; strengthening the GEF Partnership; reviewing GEF governance with a view to further improving efficiency and effectiveness; enhanced engagement with the private sector; further work on practical approaches to gender mainstreaming and capacity development; consideration of issues related to anti-money laundering and counter terrorism finance in the review and update of the GEF s minimum fiduciary standards; strengthening results based management, operational efficiency, and knowledge management; and developing options for a responsible insvestment strategy. GEF-7 Financing Framework 12. In reviewing the programming of resources for the GEF-7, Participants agreed to the indicative distribution of resources among the GEF focal areas, corporate programs, and other activities set forth as Table 1 in the programming document attached as Annex A to this summary. In discussions on programming areas, Participants reiterated support for a robust GEF replenishment. 13. The financing framework for the GEF-7 was agreed during the course of the replenishment meetings, resulting in a replenishment level for programming in the amount of SDR [xxx] million (USD eq. [xxx] million). 14. Participants agreed on the six-month averaging period for setting reference exchange rates (September 1, 2017 to February 28, 2018, subject to approval by Participants on an absence of objection basis by April 3, 2018) for use in the GEF-7. These exchange rates are used to translate GEF-7 donor contributions between SDR values and national currency values. 15. Donors supported a strong and effective GEF-7 replenishment. While many Contributing Participants faced challenging national circumstances, significant efforts were made to achieve the highest possible GEF-7 replenishment level.

16. Pledged contributions to the GEF-7 are reflected in Attachment 1 in Annex C: Draft World Bank Resolution No. [ ], Global Environment Facility Trust Fund: Seventh Replenishment of Resources. These pledged contributions amount to SDR [xxx] million (USDeq. [xxx] million) and also reflect credits for accelerated cash payments and note encashments in the amount of SDR [xx] million (USDeq. [xx] million). Additional resources that may become available for programming during the GEF-7 replenishment period include projected investment income to be earned during the GEF-7 replenishment period (FY2019 FY2022) in the amount of SDR [xx] million (USD [xx] million) and carryover of previous GEF replenishment resources in the amount of SDR [xx] million (USDeq. [xx] million). 17. Participants also confirmed that new or additional pledges to the GEF-7 not reflected in Attachment 1 in Annex C, Draft World Bank Resolution No. [ ], Global Environment Facility Trust Fund: Seventh Replenishment of Resources, would also be welcomed. Replenishment Resolution 18. Participants approved the Draft World Bank Resolution No. [ ], Global Environment Facility Trust Fund: Seventh Replenishment of Resources, which is in the form of a World Bank resolution and attached as Annex C to this Summary of Negotiations, to be considered by the GEF Council and submitted to the World Bank, as Trustee of the GEF Trust Fund, for adoption by the World Bank Executive Directors. Financial Issues for GEF-7 19. Participants noted that all Contributing Participants to the GEF-7 should make their best efforts to deposit their Instruments of Commitment or Qualified Instruments of Commitment by October 31, 2018. At every Council meeting, the Trustee will inform the Council of the status of Instruments of Commitment and Qualified Instruments of Commitment deposited with the Trustee. 20. Participants agreed that contributions made without qualification shall be paid in four equal installments by November 30 of each replenishment year as set out in the replenishment resolution or as agreed with the Trustee, provided that GEF-7 becomes effective by October 31, 2018. Participants further agreed that Contributing Participants depositing Qualified Instruments of Commitment shall use their best efforts to unqualify sufficient amounts of their contributions to pay their installment amounts by November 30 of each replenishment year. 21. Participants agreed that payment may be made in cash upfront or by the deposit of nonnegotiable, non-interest bearing demand notes or similar obligations with the Trustee. Unless otherwise agreed with the Trustee, such notes, or similar obligations, will be encashed on an approximately pro rata basis among Contributing Participants. Encashments will be made in accordance with the indicative encashment schedule as set out in the replenishment document or as agreed with the Trustee.

22. The Advance Contribution Scheme for GEF-7 will become effective on the date when the Trustee has received Instruments of Commitment or Qualified Instruments of Commitment from Contributing Participants whose contributions aggregate not less than SDR [xx] million. GEF-7 will become effective on the date when the Trustee has received Instruments of Commitment or Qualified Instruments of Commitment from Contributing Participants whose contributions aggregate not less than SDR [xx] million. 23. Participants agreed a minimum contribution to participate in the GEF-7 negotiations of SDR 4 million. The minimum contribution was calculated using the methodology agree during the GEF-6 replenishment negotiations, whereby the minimum contribution amount for participating contributors will be adjusted, at the beginning of each replenishment cycle for inflation, measured using the SDR deflator for the four calendar years prior to the start of the replenishment discussions. At the same time, Participants also agreed that larger contributions by donors, particularly developed countries, would be critically important in securing the necessary resources for the GEF to effectively deliver its mission. 24. During the replenishment process, some Participants expressed concern about the status of arrears by some Contributing Participants at the close of the GEF-6 commitment period. Participants confirmed the importance of clearing arrears. Participants agreed that the pro-rata provision did not serve well as an instrument for timely payment, and that the pro-rata provision, as set out in Paragraph 8(c) of the GEF-7 Replenishment Resolution should be discontinued. However, Participants note that this may not happen in time for the conclusion of GEF-7 negotiations due to timing issues in seeking Participants internal approvals. Participants agreed to continue to encourage all countries to make timely payments to the GEF. 25. In addition, consistent with the practice in the previous replenishments, the following means of deterring arrears should apply under the GEF-7: Continuation of the requirement, first introduced in the GEF-3 Replenishment Resolution, and set out in Paragraph 4(a) of the GEF-6 Replenishment Resolution, that if a Contributing Participant does not make a scheduled payment to the GEF-6 or a Contributing Participant that has deposited a Qualified Instrument of Commitment is unable to unqualify a scheduled contribution to the GEF-6, then such Contributing Participant shall provide the Council with a written explanation from its Minister stating the reason for the arrears or delay and the steps being taken to resolve it; Confirmation of the provision in the Instrument that voting rights accrue only for the actual contributions paid to the GEF, which confirmation is set out in Paragraph 4(b) of the GEF-6 Replenishment Resolution. 26. Noting that funding decisions made by the Council or the GEF CEO are based on available resources in the GEF Trust Fund at the time of the decision, Participants requested the Secretariat to use the full replenishment amount, including arrears, as the target programming level at the outset of the GEF-7 replenishment period, consistent with current practice.

Steps towards Concluding the Process of the Seventh GEF Replenishment 27. Participants requested the CEO/Chairperson of the GEF to forward this Summary, including the attached Annexes, to the GEF Council for review at its meeting in June 2018 in Da Nang, Vietnam. The GEF Council is invited to take note of the Summary, and to endorse the draft Replenishment Resolution, the policy recommendations, and programming document including the allocation of resources set forth in Table 1 of the programming document. 28. Participants also invited the GEF Council to request the CEO/Chairperson of the GEF to transmit this Summary to the World Bank, with a request that the World Bank Executive Directors be invited to adopt Annex C to this Summary, Draft World Bank Resolution No. [ ], Global Environment Facility Trust Fund: Seventh Replenishment of Resources, thereby authorizing the World Bank, as Trustee of the GEF Trust Fund, to manage the resources made available under the GEF-7.