Energy and Capital in a New-Keynesian Framework

Similar documents
Oil and Unemployment in a New-Keynesian Model

The Basic New Keynesian Model

Not All Oil Price Shocks Are Alike: A Neoclassical Perspective

ECON 815. A Basic New Keynesian Model II

The new Kenesian model

Household income risk, nominal frictions, and incomplete markets 1

DSGE Models with Financial Frictions

A Small Open Economy DSGE Model for an Oil Exporting Emerging Economy

Household Debt, Financial Intermediation, and Monetary Policy

The Risky Steady State and the Interest Rate Lower Bound

A Model with Costly-State Verification

Monetary Economics. Financial Markets and the Business Cycle: The Bernanke and Gertler Model. Nicola Viegi. September 2010

Microfoundations of DSGE Models: III Lecture

The Eurozone Debt Crisis: A New-Keynesian DSGE model with default risk

Unemployment Fluctuations and Nominal GDP Targeting

Monetary Economics Final Exam

Macroeconomics. Basic New Keynesian Model. Nicola Viegi. April 29, 2014

Economic stability through narrow measures of inflation

Financial intermediaries in an estimated DSGE model for the UK

Technology shocks and Monetary Policy: Assessing the Fed s performance

Money, Sticky Wages, and the Great Depression

State-Dependent Pricing and the Paradox of Flexibility

On the new Keynesian model

Comprehensive Exam. August 19, 2013

ECON 4325 Monetary Policy and Business Fluctuations

Uncertainty Shocks In A Model Of Effective Demand

Graduate Macro Theory II: Fiscal Policy in the RBC Model

Credit Disruptions and the Spillover Effects between the Household and Business Sectors

Oil Price Uncertainty in a Small Open Economy

Real Business Cycles in Emerging Countries?

Monetary Policy and Endogenous Asset Pricing Risk Premium

Money and monetary policy in Israel during the last decade

Distortionary Fiscal Policy and Monetary Policy Goals

2. Preceded (followed) by expansions (contractions) in domestic. 3. Capital, labor account for small fraction of output drop,

DSGE model with collateral constraint: estimation on Czech data

The design of the funding scheme of social security systems and its role in macroeconomic stabilization

State-Dependent Fiscal Multipliers: Calvo vs. Rotemberg *

Macroprudential Policies in a Low Interest-Rate Environment

Probably Too Little, Certainly Too Late. An Assessment of the Juncker Investment Plan

MACROECONOMICS. Prelim Exam

1 Dynamic programming

Asset Pricing and Equity Premium Puzzle. E. Young Lecture Notes Chapter 13

Sterilized Intervention and Optimal Chinese Monetary Policy

Macroeconomics 2. Lecture 6 - New Keynesian Business Cycles March. Sciences Po

STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY Department of Economics. Ph. D. Comprehensive Examination: Macroeconomics Spring, 2009

Optimal monetary policy when asset markets are incomplete

Extended DSGE Model of the Czech Economy

A Macroeconomic Model with Financial Panics

Exercises on the New-Keynesian Model

Estimating Macroeconomic Models of Financial Crises: An Endogenous Regime-Switching Approach

Risky Mortgages in a DSGE Model

. Social Security Actuarial Balance in General Equilibrium. S. İmrohoroğlu (USC) and S. Nishiyama (CBO)

Fiscal and Monetary Policy in a New Keynesian Model with Tobin s Q Investment Theory Features

Benjamin D. Keen. University of Oklahoma. Alexander W. Richter. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. Nathaniel A. Throckmorton. College of William & Mary

D10.4 Theoretical paper: A New Keynesian DSGE model with endogenous sovereign default

Equilibrium Yield Curve, Phillips Correlation, and Monetary Policy

SDP Macroeconomics Final exam, 2014 Professor Ricardo Reis

Money and monetary policy in the Eurozone: an empirical analysis during crises

On Quality Bias and Inflation Targets: Supplementary Material

Macro II. John Hassler. Spring John Hassler () New Keynesian Model:1 04/17 1 / 10

Does Calvo Meet Rotemberg at the Zero Lower Bound?

A Model of Financial Intermediation

On the Merits of Conventional vs Unconventional Fiscal Policy

Question 1 Consider an economy populated by a continuum of measure one of consumers whose preferences are defined by the utility function:

Sharing the Burden: Monetary and Fiscal Responses to a World Liquidity Trap David Cook and Michael B. Devereux

Collateral Constraints and Multiplicity

Optimal Monetary Policy Rules and House Prices: The Role of Financial Frictions

Country Spreads and Emerging Countries: Who Drives Whom? Martin Uribe and Vivian Yue (JIE, 2006)

Macroeconomic Theory Lecture 7. October 23, 2014

Output Gaps and Robust Monetary Policy Rules

Country Spreads as Credit Constraints in Emerging Economy Business Cycles

Graduate Macro Theory II: The Real Business Cycle Model

Optimality of Inflation and Nominal Output Targeting

Asset purchase policy at the effective lower bound for interest rates

Does Calvo Meet Rotemberg at the Zero Lower Bound?

Idiosyncratic risk and the dynamics of aggregate consumption: a likelihood-based perspective

Macroeconomics Qualifying Examination

Problem Set 5. Graduate Macro II, Spring 2014 The University of Notre Dame Professor Sims

Is the Maastricht debt limit safe enough for Slovakia?

Introduction to DSGE Models

Monetary Policy in a New Keyneisan Model Walsh Chapter 8 (cont)

Achieving Actuarial Balance in Social Security: Measuring the Welfare Effects on Individuals

The Extensive Margin of Trade and Monetary Policy

Menu Costs and Phillips Curve by Mikhail Golosov and Robert Lucas. JPE (2007)

State-Dependent Output and Welfare Effects of Tax Shocks

A Simple DSGE Model of Banking Industry Dynamics

Reserve Requirements and Optimal Chinese Stabilization Policy 1

International Trade Fluctuations and Monetary Policy

STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY Department of Economics. Ph. D. Comprehensive Examination: Macroeconomics Fall, 2010

TFP Decline and Japanese Unemployment in the 1990s

Monetary Economics Basic Flexible Price Models

Endogenous Trade Participation with Incomplete Exchange Rate Pass-Through

GHG Emissions Control and Monetary Policy

Investment-Specific Technological Change, Taxation and Inequality in the U.S.

Unconventional Monetary Policy

Estimating Output Gap in the Czech Republic: DSGE Approach

Firm-Specific Capital and Welfare

Habit Formation in State-Dependent Pricing Models: Implications for the Dynamics of Output and Prices

The Zero Lower Bound

Capital Income Tax Reform and the Japanese Economy (Very Preliminary and Incomplete)

Transcription:

Energy and Capital in a New-Keynesian Framework Verónica Acurio Vásconez, Gaël Giraud, Florent Mc Isaac, Ngoc Sang Pham CES, PSE, University Paris I March 27, 2014

Outline Goals Model Household Firms The Final Good Firm Intermediate Good Firms Government GDP and GDP Deflator Estimation Setting Estimation Results Impulse Response Functions

Outline Goals Model Household Firms Government Estimation Impulse Response Functions

Goals This paper constructs a New-Keynesian model with oil in the production function and in consumption. The model s parameters are estimated using Bayesian techniques. We observe the impact of the oil shock in this economy.

Outline Goals Model Household Firms Government Estimation Impulse Response Functions

Model Structure Domestic Economy

Model Structure Domestic Economy Final Good Firm Household

Model Structure Domestic Economy Final Good Firm l.s taxes invests works Household consumes

Model Structure Domestic Economy Final Good Firm l.s taxes bonds capital invests works Household consumes

Model Structure Domestic Economy Final Good Firm l.s taxes bonds capital invests works Household consumes Final Goods Energy

Model Structure Domestic Economy Final Good Firm l.s taxes bonds capital invests works Household Final Goods consumes Energy produces

Model Structure Domestic Economy Final Good Firm l.s taxes bonds capital invests works Household Intermediate Firms Final Goods consumes Energy produces

Model Structure Domestic Economy Final Good Firm l.s taxes bonds capital invests works Household Intermediate Firms Final Goods consumes Energy produces exo p. Energy Labor Capital

Model Structure Domestic Economy Final Good Firm l.s taxes bonds capital invests works Household profits Intermediate Firms exo p. Final Goods consumes Energy produces Energy Labor Capital

Model Structure Domestic Economy Final Good Firm l.s taxes bonds capital invests works Household profits Intermediate Firms exo p. Final Goods consumes Energy produces exogenous price Energy Labor Capital exo p. Foreign

Model Structure Government Taylor l.s taxes Domestic Economy Final Good Firm bonds capital invests works Household profits Intermediate Firms exo p. Final Goods consumes Energy produces exogenous price Energy Labor Capital exo p. Foreign

Outline Goals Model Household Firms Government Estimation Impulse Response Functions

Household Problem [ ] max E 0 β t U(C t, L t ), 0 < β < 1 t=0 s. t P e,t C e,t + P q,t C q,t + P k,t I t + B t + T t (1 + i t 1 )B t 1 + W t L t + D t + r k t P k,t K t

Household Problem Θ x := x x (1 x) (1 x) [ ] max E 0 β t U(C t, L t ), 0 < β < 1 t=0 C t := Θ x C x e,tc 1 x q,t s. t P e,t C e,t + P q,t C q,t + P k,t I t + B t + T t (1 + i t 1 )B t 1 + W t L t + D t + r k t P k,t K t

Household Problem Θ x := x x (1 x) (1 x) [ ] max E 0 β t U(C t, L t ), 0 < β < 1 t=0 C t := Θ x C x e,tc 1 x q,t s. t P e,t C e,t + P q,t C q,t + P k,t I t + B t + T t U(C t, L t ) = log(c t ) L1+φ t 1+φ (1 + i t 1 )B t 1 + W t L t + D t + r k t P k,t K t

Household Problem Θ x := x x (1 x) (1 x) [ ] max E 0 β t U(C t, L t ), 0 < β < 1 t=0 C t := Θ x C x e,tc 1 x q,t s. t P e,t C e,t + P q,t C q,t + P k,t I t + B t + T t U(C t, L t ) = log(c t ) L1+φ t 1+φ (1 + i t 1 )B t 1 + W t L t + D t + r k t P k,t K t C q,t := ( ) ɛ 1 0 C q,t(i) 1 1 ɛ 1 ɛ di

Household Problem Θ x := x x (1 x) (1 x) [ ] max E 0 β t U(C t, L t ), 0 < β < 1 t=0 C t := Θ x C x e,tc 1 x q,t s. t P e,t C e,t + P q,t C q,t + P k,t I t + B t + T t U(C t, L t ) = log(c t ) L1+φ t 1+φ (1 + i t 1 )B t 1 + W t L t + D t + r k t P k,t K t C q,t := ( ) ɛ 1 0 C q,t(i) 1 1 ɛ 1 ɛ di I t := K t+1 (1 δ)k t

Optimization Household s Optimal Expenditure Allocation

Optimization Household s Optimal Expenditure Allocation max C q,t,c e,t P c,t C t s. t P c,t C t = P e,t C e,t + P q,t C q,t C t = Θ x C x e,tc 1 x q,t

Optimization Household s Optimal Expenditure Allocation max C q,t,c e,t P c,t C t s. t P q,t C q,t = (1 x)p c,t C t P e,t C e,t = xp c,t C t P c,t = P x e,tp (1 x) q,t P c,t C t = P e,t C e,t + P q,t C q,t C t = Θ x C x e,tc 1 x q,t

Outline Goals Model Household Firms The Final Good Firm Intermediate Good Firms Government Estimation Impulse Response Functions

Final Good Producers Final Good Firm

Final Good Producers Intermediate Good i [0, 1] Final Good Firm

Final Good Producers Intermediate Good i [0, 1] Final Good Firm ( 1 Q t = 0 Q t(i) ɛ 1 ɛ ) ɛ ɛ 1 di

Final Good Producers Intermediate Good i [0, 1] Final Good Firm ( 1 Q t = 0 Q t(i) ɛ 1 ɛ ) ɛ ɛ 1 di ɛ: the elasticity of substitution among intermediate goods

Final Good Producer Problem Final Good Firm Profit Optimization max P q,tq t 1 Q 0 P q,t(i)q t (i)di t(i) s. t i demand final good price ( ) ɛ Pq,t (i) Q t (i) = Q t P q,t = P q,t ( ) 1 1 0 P q,t(i) 1 ɛ 1 ɛ di ( 1 Q t = 0 Q t(i) ɛ 1 ɛ ) ɛ ɛ 1 di

Intermediate Good Firms Intermediate Firms

Intermediate Good Firms Intermediate Firms Q t (i) = A t E t (i) αe L t (i) α l K t (i) α k α e, α l, α k 0, α e + α l + α k 1

Intermediate Good Firms Intermediate Firms Q t (i) = A t E t (i) αe L t (i) α l K t (i) α k α e, α l, α k 0, α e + α l + α k 1 strategy of firm i: Marginal cost pricing behavior FOC Given: P e,t, P k,t, W t and Q t (i) Choses: E t (i), L t (i) and K t (i)

Intermediate Good Firms Intermediate Firms Q t (i) = A t E t (i) αe L t (i) α l K t (i) α k α e, α l, α k 0, α e + α l + α k 1 strategy of firm i: Marginal cost pricing behavior FOC FOC Given: P e,t, P k,t, W t and Q t (i) Choses: E t (i), L t (i) and K t (i) Given: prices and quantities Choses: P q,t

Price Optimization Price Maximization (at each date t) (Calvo Price Setting) θ cannot change 1 θ can change P q,t (i) = P q,t 1 (i) P q,t (i) = P o q,t(i)

Outline Goals Model Household Firms Government GDP and GDP Deflator Estimation Impulse Response Functions

GDP and GDP Deflator Definition GDP (in value added) P y,t Y t = P q,t Q t P e,t E t

GDP and GDP Deflator Definition GDP (in value added) GDP Deflator P y,t Y t = P q,t Q t P e,t E t P y,t = P c,t

Government Government

Government Central Bank Government

Government Central Bank Government set ( ) 1 + i t = 1 β (Π φy q,t) φπ Y t εi,t Y

Government Central Bank Government set ( ) 1 + i t = 1 β (Π φy q,t) φπ Y t εi,t Y Π q,t := P q,t P q,t 1 ln(ε i,t) = ρ i ln(ε i,t 1) + e i,t

Government Central Bank set Government budget constraint ( ) 1 + i t = 1 β (Π φy q,t) φπ Y t εi,t Y (1 + i t 1 )B t 1 + G t = B t + T t Π q,t := P q,t P q,t 1 ln(ε i,t) = ρ i ln(ε i,t 1) + e i,t

Government ln(g r,t) = (1 ρ g )(ln(ωq)) + ρ g ln(g r,t 1) + ρ alk,g e alk,t + ρ ae,g e ae,t + e g,t Central Bank set Government spending function budget constraint ( ) 1 + i t = 1 β (Π φy q,t) φπ Y t εi,t Y (1 + i t 1 )B t 1 + G t = B t + T t Π q,t := P q,t P q,t 1 ln(ε i,t) = ρ i ln(ε i,t 1) + e i,t

Other Shocks Oil Price AR(1) S e,t := Pe,t P q,t log(s e,t) = ρ s,elog(s e,t 1) + e se,t

Other Shocks Oil Price Capital Price AR(1) S e,t := Pe,t P q,t S k,t := P k,t P q,t AR(1) log(s e,t) = ρ s,elog(s e,t 1) + e se,t log(s k,t ) = ρ s,k log(s k,t 1 ) + e sk,t

Other Shocks TFP AR(1) ln(a t ) = ρ a ln(a t 1 ) + e a,t

Other Shocks TFP AR(1) Price Markup ARMA(1,1) ln(a t ) = ρ a ln(a t 1 ) + e a,t ε p,t = ρ pε p,t 1 + e p,t ν pe p,t 1

Definition of Equilibrium Equilibrium

Definition of Equilibrium agents maximize its problems all markets clear Equilibrium Goverment budget const. fulfilled

Outline Goals Model Household Firms Government Estimation Setting Estimation Results Impulse Response Functions

Data Observed Variable invobs yobs labobs infobs Transformation ( ( ) ) PFI GDPDEF detrend ln LNSIndex 100 detrend ( ln ( ) ) GDPC09 LNSIndex 100 ln ( ) ( ( ) ) Averagehours CE16OVIndex LNSIndex 100 mean ln Averagehours CE16OVIndex LNSIndex 100 ( ln GDPDEF GDPDEF ( 1) ) ( 100 mean ln ( GDPDEF GDPDEF ( 1) ) ) 100 iobs eobs ( ln ( 1 + FEDFUND 400 ln ( TotalSAOil LNSIndex ) ( ( ))) mean ln 1 + FEDFUND 400 100 ) ( ( 100 mean ln TotalSAOil ) ) LNSIndex 100

Calibrated Parameters β δ ω x ɛ 0.99 0.025 0.18 0.023 8 Table : Calibrated Parameters

Estimation Results - θ estimated Parameter Prior distribution Posterior distribution Mode Mean 10% 90% θ estimated Capital elasticity α k IGamma(0.1,2) 0.3728 0.3599 0.3380 0.3822 Labor elasticity α l IGamma(0.4,2) 0.6424 0.6411 0.6111 0.6745 Oil elasticity α e IGamma(0.6,2) 0.1234 0.1254 0.1051 0.1460 Inverse Frisch elasticity φ IGamma(1.17,0.5) 0.6209 0.6308 0.4736 0.8019 Taylor rule response to inflation φ π Normal(1.2,0.1) 1.2235 1.2253 1.0686 1.3558 Taylor rule response to output φ y Normal(0.5,0.1) 0.8020 0.7882 0.6884 0.8876 Calvo price parameter θ Beta(0.5,0.1) 0.9812 0.9812 0.9380 0.9883 Table : Prior and Posterior Distribution of Structural Parameters

Estimation Results - θ estimated Table : Prior and Posterior Distribution of Shock Parameters Parameter Prior distribution Posterior distribution Mode Mean 10% 90% Autoregressive parameters Technology ρ a Beta(0.5,0.2) 0.8619 0.8481 0.7960 0.8999 Real oil price ρ se Beta(0.5,0.2) 0.5761 0.5611 0.4629 0.6669 Real capital price ρ sk Beta(0.5,0.2) 0.7210 0.7080 0.6647 0.7524 Price markup1 ρ p Beta(0.5,0.2) 0.9418 0.9283 0.8955 0.9640 Price markup2 ν p Beta(0.5,0.2) 0.9796 0.9760 0.9610 0.9913 Government ρ g Beta(0.5,0.2) 0.9058 0.8995 0.8712 0.9258 Tech. in Gov. ρ ag Beta(0.5,0.2) 0.6904 0.6127 0.3549 0.9472 Monetary ρ i Beta(0.5,0.2) 0.9399 0.9308 0.9035 0.9581 Standard deviations Technology σ a IGamma(1,2) 0.4361 0.4435 0.3901 0.4942 Real oil price σ se IGamma(1,2) 2.0000 1.9373 1.8652 2.000 Real capital price σ sk IGamma(1,2) 0.7740 0.7675 0.6379 0.8781 Price markup σ p IGamma(1,2) 0.1814 0.1854 0.1615 0.2094 Government σ g IGamma(1,2) 2.0000 1.7921 1.5508 1.9998 Monetary σ i IGamma(1,2) 0.5410 0.4566 0.3859 0.5205

Estimation Results - θ calibrated Parameter Prior distribution Posterior distribution Mode Mean 10% 90% θ calibrated Capital elasticity α k IGamma(0.2,2) 0.3918 0.3809 0.3624 0.3989 Labor elasticity α l IGamma(0.4,2) 0.5947 0.5966 0.5622 0.6305 Oil elasticity α e IGamma(0.5,2) 0.1132 0.1177 0.0915 0.1434 Inverse Frisch elasticity φ IGamma(1.17,0.5) 1.2562 1.2625 0.9073 1.6069 Taylor rule response to inflation φ π Normal(1.2,0.1) 1.5236 1.5307 1.3883 1.6722 Taylor rule response to output φ y Normal(0.5,0.1) 0.0265 0.0214 0.0001 0.0402 Table : Prior and Posterior Distribution of Structural Parameters

Estimation Results - θ calibrated Table : Prior and Posterior Distribution of Shock Parameters Parameter Prior distribution Posterior distribution Mode Mean 10% 90% Autoregressive parameters Technology ρ a Beta(0.5,0.2) 0.9605 0.9401 0.9033 0.9774 Real oil price ρ se Beta(0.5,0.2) 0.9934 0.9872 0.9754 0.9977 Real capital price ρ sk Beta(0.5,0.2) 0.8940 0.8924 0.8483 0.9314 Price markup1 ρ p Beta(0.5,0.2) 0.9839 0.9621 0.9299 0.9971 Price markup2 ν p Beta(0.5,0.2) 0.1652 0.1711 0.0593 0.2758 Government ρ g Beta(0.5,0.2) 0.9373 0.9312 0.9061 0.9560 Tech. in Gov. ρ ag Beta(0.5,0.2) 0.7129 0.6589 0.3808 0.9541 Monetary ρ i Beta(0.5,0.2) 0.1914 0.2104 0.1249 0.2856 Standard deviations Technology σ a IGamma(1,2) 0.4538 0.4542 0.3981 0.5078 Real oil price σ se IGamma(1,2) 2.0000 1.9475 1.8842 2.000 Real capital price σ sk IGamma(1,2) 0.5459 0.5750 0.4722 0.6714 Price markup σ p IGamma(1,2) 0.4235 0.4645 0.2868 0.6602 Government σ g IGamma(1,2) 2.0000 1.8359 1.6425 2.000 Monetary σ i IGamma(1,2) 0.4778 0.4769 0.4062 0.54555

Outline Goals Model Household Firms Government Estimation Impulse Response Functions

0.02 0.015 0.01 0.005 Dom. Inflation 0.01 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 Consump. 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 Real Wages 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Oil 0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 0.06 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 1.2 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 % Change 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 Labor 0.01 0.008 0.006 0.004 0.002 Capital 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 Investment 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 Dom.Output 0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 x 10 3 GDP 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.005 Int. Rate 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 rk 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 Marg. Cost 2.5 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 Quarters 0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 Quarters 0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 Quarters 0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 Quarters IRF to a Real Oil Price Shock. Case: θ Estimated

20 x 10 3 Dom. Inflation 0 Consump. 0 Real Wages 0 Oil 15 0.1 0.1 0.5 10 0.2 0.2 1 5 0.3 0.3 1.5 0 1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 0.4 1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 0.4 1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 2 1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 % Change 0.04 0.02 0 0.02 Labor 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 Capital 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Investment 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 Dom.Output 1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 GDP 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 Quarters 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.005 0 0.005 Int. Rate 0.01 1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 Quarters rk 0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 Quarters 0 5 10 15 x 10 4 Marg. Cost 20 1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 Quarters IRF to a Real Oil Price Shock. Case: θ Calibrated

Optimization 1 = βe t [(1 + i t ) Ct C t+1 ] P c,t P c,t+1 Euler First Order Conditions competive labor supply sch. W t P c,t = C t L φ t Fisher 1 = βe t [ C t C t+1 P c,t P c,t+1 P k,t+1 P k,t (r k t+1 + 1 δ) ]

No Ponzi Scheme Transversality condition (no Ponzi Scheme) lim k E t t+k 1 s=0 B t+k 0, (1 + i s 1 ) t.

Stochastic Discount Factor 1. from date t to date t + 1 d t,t+1 := βu C (C t+1, L t+1 ) U C (C t, L t ) P c,t P c,t+1, i.e, 1 1 + i t = E t (d t,t+1 ). 2. from date t to date t + k d t,t+k := t+k 1 s=t s+1 P c,t s, then, d t,t+k := βk U C (C t+k, L t+k ). U C (C t, L t ) P c,t+k

Cost Minimization Cost minimization F.O.C mc t (i) := Wt α l Qt (i) Lt (i) = r k t P i,t α k Qt (i) Kt (i) = Pe,t α e Qt (i) Et (i) mc t (i) = F t Q t (i) 1 αe +α l +α 1 k cost(q t (i)) = (α e + α l + α k )F t Q t (i) 1 αe +α l +α k F t := ( Aα αe e α α l l αα k k P αe e,t W α l t (rt k P i,t) α k ) 1 αe +α l +α k

Price Optimization Price Maximization (at each date t) Flexible Price Setting Calvo Price Setting µ p = ɛ ɛ 1 P q,t = µ p mc t max P q,t(i)q t (i) cost(q t (i)) P q,t(i) s.t ( ) ɛ Pq,t (i) Q t (i) = Q t P q,t

Calvo Price Setting Calvo Price Setting θ cannot change 1 θ can change P q,t (i) = P q,t 1 (i) P q,t (i) = P o q,t(i) P q,t = ( θp 1 ɛ q,t 1 + (1 θ)(po q,t) 1 ɛ) 1 1 ɛ

Calvo Price Setting Calvo Price Setting Problem [ max E [ t θ k d t,t+k Pq,t (i)q t,t+k (i) cost(q t,t+k (i)) ]] P q,t(i) k=0 s.t ( ) ɛ Pq,t (i) Q t,t+k (i) = Q t+k, k 0 P q,t+k

Calvo Price Setting Calvo Price Setting Solution E t [ k=0 θ k d t,t+k Q o t,t+k ( P o q,t µ p mc o t,t+k) ] = 0 mc o t,t+k := F t+k(q o t,t+k ) 1 αe +α l +α k 1 ( P o ) ɛ Qt,t+k o = q,t Q t+k P q,t+k