Review and Update of Year 2035 Regional Transportation Plan

Similar documents
Chapter 3: Regional Transportation Finance

Public Transit: The Funding Crisis and A Need for Action

Financial Capacity Analysis

Transportation Trust Fund Overview

10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan DRAFT

INVESTING STRATEGICALLY

TEX Rail Fort Worth, Texas Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2012)

YEAR 2035 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN: FISCALLY CONSTRAINED ESTIMATED COSTS AND ATTENDANT REVENUES

University Link LRT Extension

WASATCH FRONT REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN FINANCIAL PLAN. Technical Report 47 May 2007 DAVIS MORGAN SALT LAKE TOOELE WEBER

Overview of the Final New Starts / Small Starts Regulation and Frequently Asked Questions

QUALITY TRANSPORTATION SUMMARY

Chapter 5: Cost and Revenues Assumptions

Transportation Funding

Chapter 4: Regional Transportation Finance

Analysis of the Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan Prepared by Alameda County Transportation Commission

Corridors of Commerce DRAFT Scoring and Prioritization Process. Patrick Weidemann Director of Capital Planning and Programming November 1, 2017

The Oregon Department of Transportation Budget

FY Statewide Capital Investment Strategy... asset management, performance-based strategic direction

Chapter 6: Financial Resources

10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan DRAFT

CHAPTER 5 INVESTMENT PLAN

Keep Wisconsin Moving Smart Investments Measurable Results

Tools & Methods for Monitoring Performance Results

GLOSSARY. At-Grade Crossing: Intersection of two roadways or a highway and a railroad at the same grade.

INVESTMENT STRATEGIES

Intercity Transit Community Update

Contents. Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization. Introduction S. St. Mary s Street San Antonio, Texas 78205

METRO. Metro Funding. Associated Master Plan: Comprehensive Master Transportation Plan (MTP) for Arlington. Neighborhood(s):

REPORT TO THE CAPITAL REGIONAL DISTRICT BOARD MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2010

2040 Long Range Transportation Plan. Financial Summary

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT

Northern Virginia District State of the District. Helen L. Cuervo, P.E. District Engineer March 15, 2016

Parking Services and Transportation Planning

Hot Springs Bypass Extension TIGER 2017 Application. Benefit-Cost Analysis Methodology Summary

Arlington County, Virginia

Recommendations for On the Move Plan Elements -- DRAFT MAY 23 Funding Goal Group June 22, 2006 Page 1

Minnesota Smart Transportation:

INVEST IN TRANSIT. The Regional Transit Strategic Plan for Chicago and Northeastern Illinois ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT FEBRUARY 2019

Transportation Improvement Program and Incentives for Local Planning

ALL Counties. ALL Districts

Minutes of the Meeting ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING FOR THE MILWAUKEE URBANIZED AREA

Hawaii Smart Transportation: Save Money and Grow the Economy

Appendix E: Revenues and Cost Estimates

Strategic Plan Performance Metrics & Targets

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED FEBRUARY 5, 2018

QUALITY TRANSPORTATION SUMMARY

APPENDIX I REVENUE PROJECTION AND ASSUMPTIONS

Economic Impact of Public Transportation Investment 2014 UPDATE

Proposition 1B and the Strategic Growth Plan

Chapter 10 Equity and Environmental Justice

WILMAPCO Public Opinion Survey Summary of Results

Budget Performance in Millions of Dollars Favorable/Unfavorable to Budget. Suburban Suburban

P.L.2016, CHAPTER 56, approved October 14, 2016 Assembly, No. 10 (Fourth Reprint)

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2009 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 148

APPENDIX B TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #2 TRANSPORTATION FUNDING

Agenda. Background Budget / PW General Fund Budget Streets & Infrastructure Citizen Engagement

CHAPTER 4 1 Transportation Financial Analysis

ACTION ELEMENT CONCLUSIONS

Rule #1: Procedure for Distribution of Revenues for Transportation Services for Seniors and the Disabled

TESTIMONY. The Texas Transportation Challenge. Testimony Before the Study Commission on Transportation Financing

I-81 Corridor Improvement Plan. October 2018 Public Meetings

TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM WAUSAU METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION WAUSAU, WISCONSIN METROPOLITAN AREA

10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan

Referendum 51 Gets Us Moving, Safely, Again

Increased Transportation Infrastructure Investment Critical to State s Continued Economic Development

Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Appendix G Economic Analysis Report

Georgia Department of Audits and Accounts Performance Audit Division

final report Benefit/Cost Analysis for U.S. 41 Corridor ITS New Start - Winnebago, Outagamie, and Brown Counties

Planning Board Worksession No.6: Transportation and Staging

Metropolitan Council Budget Overview: State Fiscal Year

Table of Contents. Study Overview. Corridor Needs Analysis. Financial Strategies. Legislative Review

Public Hearing Tarrant County. April 14, 2009

PENNSYLVANIA S 2017 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM FINANCIAL GUIDANCE

Transportation Package HB 2017

Attachment 3, Page 1

Project Summary Project Name: Route 37 Corridor Safety Sweep Project Number:

Benefit Cost Analysis for the San Juan Multi-Modal Transportation System: Infrastructure and Safety Improvements

DRAFT REGIONAL TRANSIT SYSTEM PLAN Regional Task Force July 8, 2011

8. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

Minimum Elements of a Local Comprehensive Plan

Transportation Improvement Program

Columbia Pike Transit Initiative: Comparative Return on Investment Study

CHAPTER 9 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS

Planning Board Worksession No.1-Transportation and Staging

FY17 Budget Discussion

Strategic Performance measures

I-75 at Overpass Road Interchange

Financial Snapshot October 2014

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

FY19 Budget - Discussion. April 2018

January 26, 2010 File Number

Measure I Strategic Plan, April 1, 2009 Glossary Administrative Committee Advance Expenditure Agreement (AEA) Advance Expenditure Process

Funding Local Public Transportation

Countywide Dialogue on Transportation

City of Portsmouth Portsmouth, New Hampshire Department of Public Works

STAFF REPORT Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) Scenario Performance Update for Board Direction

TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IN THE PORTLAND METRO REGION

Transcription:

Review and Update of Year 2035 Regional Transportation Plan #217752 1

Background Every four years, the Year 2035 Plan is reviewed Elements of review Validity of Plan Year 2035 forecasts Transportation system performance Status of implementation of Year 2035 Plan Adequacy of funding to implement plan 2

Background (continued) Year 2035 Plan completed in 2006 Last four year review completed in 2010 VISION 2050 VISION 2050 now underway will result in a new year 2050 regional transportation plan which will replace the Year 2035 Plan Scheduled to be completed in June 2015 3

Review of Year 2035 Forecasts Comparison of Forecasts to Actual Estimated Year 2011/2012 Population and Households - 2 percent high Employment - 5 percent high Automobile ownership - 3 percent low Vehicle-Miles of Travel - 6 percent high Transit Ridership - 27 percent high Conclusion Forecasts upon which plan is based (population, households, and employment) remain valid Transit ridership forecast is high due to lack of implementation of 2035 plan transit element. 4

Review of Transportation System Performance Measures of Performance Pavement and bridge condition Highway and transit safety Traffic congestion and travel times Transit service area Air pollutant emissions Little change in system performance except some improvement in bridge condition; some reduction in highway and transit fatalities, injuries, and crashes; reduction in transit service area; and significant reduction in transportation air pollutant emissions 5

Implementation to Date of Year 2035 Regional Transportation Plan Implementation to date of recommendations of a 30-year plan should be expected to be somewhat limited: About 8 years have passed since plan was adopted in June 2006 Implementation has been affected by economic downturns starting in 2001 and 2008 6

Implementation to Date of Year 2035 Plan Public Transit Element Transit Service Provided in 2012 Compared to 2005 Plan recommendations: Significantly improve and expand transit service coverage, service hours, and service frequency (100 percent expansion) Develop rapid and express transit systems Since 2006: Fixed route transit service (bus) has declined by 7 percent Demand responsive transit service has increased by 17 percent Transit fares have increased faster than inflation Milwaukee streetcar project has proceeded to final engineering 7

Implementation to Date of Year 2035 Plan Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Element Existing and Planned Off-Street Bicycle Path System: 2013 Plan recommendations: Bicycle accommodation should be considered as each segment of arterial street and highway is resurfaced and reconstructed Expand 203-mile off-street bicycle path system to 586 miles Since 2006: WisDOT and FHWA now require bicycle accommodation on all State or Federallyfunded projects, unless demonstrated to be prohibitive. On-street accommodation has increased from 633 to 832 miles. About 47 miles of off-street bicycle paths have been constructed. 8

Implementation to Date of Year 2035 Plan Transportation Systems Management Element Locations of Ramp Meters: 2013 Plan recommendations: Freeway traffic management Arterial street and highway traffic management Major activity parking management in the City of Milwaukee Regional Transportation Operations Program Since 2006: Freeway ramp meters added New variable message signs and closedcircuit television cameras on both freeways and surface arterial streets and highways Expansion of signal coordination on arterial streets and highways 9

Implementation to Date of Year 2035 Plan Travel Demand Management Element Existing and Proposed Park-Ride Lots and Transit Stations: 2013 Plan recommendations: Preferential treatment for high-occupancy vehicles Construct additional park-ride lots Increase transit information and marketing Develop site-specific neighborhood land use plans to promote transit, bicycle, and pedestrian travel Since 2006: 3 new park-ride lots constructed Bicycle racks added to Milwaukee County, Ozaukee County, and City of Kenosha buses Site-specific transit-oriented development plans created for the nine KRM commuter rail stations 10

Implementation to Date of Year 2035 Plan Arterial Street and Highway Element Arterial Street and Highway Capacity Improvement Completed between 2006 and 2012 Plan recommendations: Total of 3,662 miles of arterial streets and highways in Region Resurface and reconstruct 3,209 miles without widening Reconstruct 360 route-miles (including 127 miles of freeways) with additional lanes Add 93 route-miles of new arterial facilities Since 2006: 50 miles of arterial facilities reconstructed and widened 15 miles of new arterial facilities built; 5 miles of new arterial facilities under construction IH 94 between Mitchell Interchange and Illinois state line being reconstructed Marquette Interchange rebuilt; Zoo Interchange under construction 11

Proposed 2035 Plan Amendments As VISION 2050 will result in a new regional transportation plan in about one year, only one plan amendment is proposed. The plan amendment is a result of a decision made in a WisDOT preliminary engineering study of the reconstruction of IH 43 between Silver Spring Drive and STH 60 to convert the existing half interchange at the Milwaukee County-Ozaukee County line to a full interchange during the IH 43 reconstruction. 12

Review of Funding Available to Implement 2035 Plan Review may only consider: Funding revenues which exist or can reasonably be expected to become available. Must also consider any current restrictions and limitations on the use of current funding revenues and whether they can be reasonably expected to change. Current restrictions include the use of funding for capital but not operating expenditures and restrictions on the use of funding by mode of transportation. 13

Review of Funding Available to Implement 2035 Plan (continued) Major Changes in Funding Since 2006 State gas tax indexing to inflation ended in 2006 Regional Transit Authority (RTA) legislation introduced in June 2009 in Governor s 2009-2011 State Budget was rejected by the State Legislature Joint Finance Committee State legislation for new sales tax dedicated funding for Milwaukee County Transit System was vetoed by Governor in 2009 State legislation proposed by Governor in April 2010 allowing creation of RTA s was not approved by State Legislature State funding to transit systems reduced by 10 percent in 2011-2013 State budget 14

Review of Funding Available to Implement 2035 Plan (continued) Implications of Funding Changes on 2035 Regional Plan In the absence of major changes in transportation funding including both the amount of funding and restrictions on the use of funding: Public transit would not be improved or expanded, and some further reduction may be expected to occur Reconstruction of the freeway system will not be completed by 2035 15

Review of Funding Available to Implement 2035 Plan (continued) Implications of Funding Changes on 2035 Regional Plan (continued) In considering these conclusions, it should be recognized that the 2035 plan noted that transit system preservation, and improvement and expansion, would be dependent upon local dedicated transit funding (sales tax between 0.25 to 1.00 percent), creation of a RTA, and State funding annual increases of 4 to 5 percent. 16

Review of Funding Available to Implement 2035 Plan (continued) 2035 Regional Transportation Plan will remain the desired future, or vision for the future A 2035 Fiscally Constrained Regional Transportation Plan has been developed to demonstrate what cannot be accomplished within existing revenues. Differences between 2035 Transportation Plan Vision and 2035 Transportation Plan Fiscally Constrained Only 89 miles of freeway may be reconstructed by 2035, rather than 255 miles Public transit would not be improved and expanded (a doubling of transit service), but would be expected to continue to be reduced by an additional 11 percent. 17

Review of Funding Available to Implement 2035 Plan (continued) Freeways expected to be reconstructed under the Fiscally Constrained 2035 Plan 18

Review of Funding Available to Implement 2035 Plan (continued) Public transit service expected to remain under Fiscally Constrained 2035 Plan 19

Fiscally Constrained Plan Impacts on Minority and Low Income Populations Streets and highways: Conclusions No area of the Region, or minority or low income community, disproportionately bears the impact of proposed freeway or street and highway capacity improvements. While some segments of proposed widened freeways and streets and highways are adjacent to minority and low income populations, the vast majority of proposed widened freeways and streets and highways are not. See Maps 1 and 2 20

Map 1 21

Map 2 22

Fiscally Constrained Plan Impacts on Minority and Low Income Populations (continued) Public transit: Conclusion The public transit system would predominately serve the principal concentrations of minority and low income populations. See Maps 3 and 4. 23

Map 3 24

Map 4 25

Key Findings from 2035 Plan Review and Update Plan forecasts of future conditions are on track. Plan implementation has lagged, particularly with respect to public transit. Lagging plan implementation is a result of changes in funding, and lack of progress in new funding. Key finding for VISION 2050: Funding must be addressed or the desired regional transportation system will remain an unattainable vision Dedicated local funding for transit, Regional Transit Authority, and increased State funding for transit Indexing of motor fuel tax or a replacement funding source 26