DOCUMENT 14 REPORT OF THE REGIONAL FEES WORKING GROUP TO THE INTERAMERICAN SCOUT COMMITTEE

Similar documents
Program Budget

Indian Perspective. J. B. Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Dr Milind Joshi Global Regulatory Management 28 June 07

Public Procurement networks in Latin America and the Caribbean

Latin America and the Caribbean. Risk & Vulnerability Assessment Highlights (2018) Better solutions. Fewer disasters. Safer world.

Trujillo, Verónica and Navajas, Sergio (2014). Financial Inclusion in Latin America and the Caribbean: Data and Trends. MIF, IDB.

St. Martin 2013 SERVICES AND RATES

Distribution effects of inflation through banking credit: the case of Argentina

FedEx International Priority. FedEx International Economy 3

Request for Information (RFI) for Life Insurance Benefits

How does the increasing global uncertainty affect Latin American ratings?

Session 4, Stream 6. Global regulation of lending. John Paul Zammit. 07 & 08 October 2015

Belize FedEx International Priority. FedEx International Economy 3

Belize FedEx International Priority. FedEx International Economy 3

Summary of 2013/14 Doing Business Reforms in Latin America and the Caribbean 2

Revenue Statistics in Latin America and the Caribbean

The Great Deceleration

CReCER: Knowledge and Learning on Corporate Financial Reporting & Public Financial Management Elizabeth Adu The World Bank June 30, 2011

Revenue Statistics in Latin America and the Caribbean

Microfinance in Latin America and the Caribbean Data Update- April 5, 2008

Total Imports by Volume (Gallons per Country)

A. Setting the objective against which needs are to be measured

Total Imports by Volume (Gallons per Country)

Taxes in Latin America and the Caribbean Situation and prospects

Total Imports by Volume (Gallons per Country)

Total Imports by Volume (Gallons per Country)

Total Imports by Volume (Gallons per Country)

Total Imports by Volume (Gallons per Country)

Total Imports by Volume (Gallons per Country)

Total Imports by Volume (Gallons per Country)

Total Imports by Volume (Gallons per Country)

Total Imports by Volume (Gallons per Country)

Total Imports by Volume (Gallons per Country)

Total Imports by Volume (Gallons per Country)

THE LANDSCAPE OF MICROINSURANCE

Thirty-eighth Regular Meeting of the Executive Committee Program Budget. IICA/CE/Doc. 679 (18) - Original: Spanish

Priorities for Productivity and Income (PPIs) Country Results

Joint World Bank CEMLA Workshop Debt Management Performance Assessment Tool (DeMPA) Overview of Debt Management in LAC

Labor Markets in Latin America and the Caribbean & IDB Agenda

Compare Countries. Latin America Heat map. In Latin America. Last Updated: December 2010

This response summarizes the perspectives shared by our country members, as per the following due process.

Sugar Monthly Import and Re-Exports

U.S. Sugar Monthly Import and Re-Exports

Canada Jumps on the Bilateral Bandwagon

Low-carbon Development and Carbon Finance at the IDB Maria Netto Sustainable Energy and Climate Change Unit (ECC)

Today s Presentation. Background. Objectives

The regional process on access to information, public participation and justice in environmental matters (Principle 10) in Latin America and the

Measuring Loss on Latin American Defaulted Bank Loans: A 27-Year Study of 27 Countries

Total Imports by Volume (Gallons per Country)

Q & A CREA TU FUTURO PROGRAM ALONG WITH THE REGION S

AfrICANDO th Annual. Making Technology Work for African MSMEs, Globally. U.S. Africa Trade & Investment Symposium. September 25 27, 2018

IX ARIN Meeting April 2002 Las Vegas, US.

Status of regional activities and risks

Enterprise Surveys e. Obtaining Finance in Latin America and the Caribbean 1

Recent developments. Note: This section was prepared by Dana Vorisek. Brent Harrison provided research assistance. 1

2. Mining equipment exports

Sugar Monthly Import and Re-Exports

FOREIGN INVESTMENT IN LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN 2004 REPORT. Presentation by Mr. José Luis Machinea, Executive Secretary of ECLAC

Outlook for the World Economy: Implications for the Caribbean. Saul Lizondo. Western Hemisphere Department International Monetary Fund

Quarterly Financial Report

Quarterly Financial Report

Third Meeting of the American Regional Commission. on Polio Containment

Quarterly Financial Report

Quarterly Financial Report

Trade Flows, Financial Linkage, and Business Cycles in Latin America

Money and Politics: the Latin American experience

TRAC Services Individual Challenges and Harmonisation: The CMC Post approval Landscape in Argentina, Mexico and Colombia

Sustainable social and economic transition: Some evidence from Latin America

Quarterly Financial Report

Financing the LAC NDCs

GS/OAS. Semiannual Financial Report (SFR) S TABLE OF CONTENTS. Key financial data 2

Juan Pablo Jiménez Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean

Inter-American Investment Corporation. Investor Presentation

Role of MDBs in financing of countries NDCs

Latin American Fund Manager Incentive Program ( FMIP ) Questions & Answers June 2018

Executive Summary. Fiscal Panorama. of Latin America and the Caribbean 2015 Policy space and dilemmas

Directors and Investors Perspectives

PART II PAN AMERICAN HEALTH ORGANIZATION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

LATIN AMERICA: IS IT MOVING FORWARD? Ricardo Hausmann Kennedy School of Government Harvard University

Fiscal and Debt Coordination

U.S. Department of Commerce U.S. Commercial Service. Resources for U.S. Exporters. March 27, 2015

5688/13 JPS/io 1 DGB 1 B?? EN

Macroeconomic Outlook for Latin America

Doing Business Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises. Augusto Lopez-Claros

GS/OAS. Semiannual Financial Report (SFR) S TABLE OF CONTENTS. Key financial data 2

GENERAL BACKGROUND ON REGIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS IN LATIN AMERICA May 2003

Benchmarking LAC through the cycle, so far: downturn and recovery

Organization of American States OAS QUARTERLY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REPORT MARCH 31, 2011

INDIAN INVESTMENTS IN LATIN AMERICA AND CARIBBEAN: TRENDS AND PROSPECTS

How Nasty will the External Environment Get? Global Scenarios for LAC

Market Surveillance. Lessons Learned in Latin America. Prepared by: Ms Beatriz Arizu For: The World Bank Energy Forum.

Colombia s Sovereign Rating

Global trends and Foreign Direct Investment in Latin America

YUM! Brands, Inc. Historical Financial Summary. Second Quarter, 2017

Latin America Copes with Volatility, The Dark Side of Globalization

LAC Treads a Narrow Path to Growth: The Slowdown and its Macroeconomic Challenges

SINDUSFARMA Working Group Regulatory Latam

RE: Exposure Draft (ED/2014/5) on Classification and Measurement of Share-based Payment Transactions (Proposed amendments to IFRS 2).

Fiscal Panorama of Latin America and the Caribbean

Organization of American States OAS QUARTERLY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REPORT JUNE 30, 2011

Labor productivity as a driver of growth. Centrale Bank van Curaçao en Sint Maarten Research Department Shekinah Dare March 23, 2018

Transcription:

DOCUMENT 14 REPORT OF THE REGIONAL FEES WORKING GROUP TO THE INTERAMERICAN SCOUT

REPORT OF THE REGIONAL FEES WORKING GROUP TO THE INTERAMERICAN SCOUT. Table of Contents... 2 1. Introduction... 2 2. Working Group... 2 3. Analysis of the current scheme of regional quotas... 3 4. Proposal for a new scheme of regional fees... 4 4.1 Methodology... 5 4.2 Proposed scheme... 7 4.3 Results... 7 4.4 Impact on the budget of the Interamerican Region... 8 5. Reasonableness analysis... 9 6. Partial and/or temporary exceptions... 11 27th Interamerican Scout Conference Panama 2018 Page 1 of 11

REPORT OF THE REGIONAL FEES WORKING GROUP TO THE INTERAMERICAN SCOUT 1. Introduction The 26th Interamerican Scout Conference, held in Houston city, United States, on October 2016, adopted the following: Resolution 5/16 Analysis of Regional Annual Fees The Conference, considering: That the Regional Constitution establishes the responsibility of the NSOs of the Region to contributing economically to provide the means for the development of the activities and for the compliance with the agreements of the Interamerican Scout Conference; The importance of the governance principles, the benefits of transparency, and the need for an equitable organization; Agrees: Request from the Interamerican Scout Committee, through whichever means the World Scout Bureau - Interamerica Support Centre may consider appropriate, the analysis of the calculations of the Regional Annual Fees, as well as the publishing of the results. In order to comply with Resolution 5/16 of the 26th Interamerican Scout Conference, the Interamerican Scout Committee created, through Agreement 14/2017, the Working Group on Regional Fees and Finances, which has prepared this report. 2. Working Group The working group was composed of the following members: Interamerican Scout Committee (ISC): Enzo Defilippi, ISC Member, Chairperson of the Working Group Armando Aguirre, 2nd. ISC Vice-chairperson Zaida Joaquin, ISC Member Volunteers: Wilmar Valencia, Member of Scouts of Venezuela Marcos Michelini, Member of Scout Movement of Uruguay Juan Pablo Diaz, Member of Scouts of Venezuela WSB-IASC: Jose Gabriel Criollo, Director, Institutional Development Anibal Goti, Office Manager Page 2 de 11 REPORT OF THE 27 th Interamerican Scout Conference- Panama 2018

3. Analysis of the current scheme of regional quotas Table 1 shows the evolution of the budget of the Interamerican Region, the contribution of WOSM and the percentage represented by regional fees during the last six fiscal years. Table 1: Budget of the Interamerican Region, contribution of WOSM and regional fee during the last six fiscal years (US$) Fiscal year/año fiscal Budget/ Presupuesto WOSM allocation Aporte de OMMS Regional fees/ Cuotas regionales % of Budget/ % del presupuesto FY 2012-13 779,931 689,431 17,625 2.26% FY 2013-14 776,500-0.44% 670,000-2.82% 17,625 2.27% FY 2014-15 778,542 0.26% 680,444 1.56% 17,625 2.26% FY 2015-16 762,025-2.12% 665,400-2.21% 17,625 2.31% FY 2016-17 728,625-4.38% 632,000-5.02% 18,275 2.51% FY 2017-18 708,425-2.80% 594,000-6.01% 18,275 2.60% Source: WSB-IASC Table 2 shows the membership as of December 2015, the Gross National Income per capita adjusted by the purchasing power parity of each country and the regional fee of each NSO. Table 2: Membership, Gross National Income and regional fee of each NSO (US$) NSO WOSM Category Membership Dec 31, 2015 GNI per capita, PPP Regional fee 2016-17 Argentina C 70,174 29,051 500 Aruba D 506 536 250 Bahamas D 1,551 1,043 400 Barbados C 2,419 2,356 150 Belize C 830 1,891 125 Bolivia B 7,355 2,673 125 Brazil B 90,102 31,559 1,000 Canada D 98,193 115,419 2,000 Chile C 20,801 13,752 1,000 Colombia B 14,153 4,849 400 Costa Rica C 11,423 3,728 500 Curaçao D 1,462 1,484 400 Dominica C 1,100 719 125 Dominican Republic B 1,524 649 400 Ecuador B 6,032 1,500 400 El Salvador B 3,320 1,513 400 Grenada C 1,378 921 125 Guatemala B 5,152 2,890 1,000 27th Interamerican Scout Conference Panama 2018 Page 3 of 11

Guyana B 424 315 125 Haiti A 43,618 3,605 125 Honduras B 2,701 978 400 Jamaica B 1,727 1,412 250 Mexico C 43,030 26,810 1,000 Nicaragua A 1,496 449 125 Panama C 2,615 1,215 525 Paraguay B 1,086 315 250 Peru B 8,290 2,318 500 St. Lucia C 393 315 125 SVG C 230 345 125 Suriname B 787 1,386 125 Trinidad & Tobago C 9,139 4,326 400 Uruguay C 1,976 1,048 400 USA D 3,969,321 1,498,280 4,000 Venezuela (GNI data 2013) C 14,148 9,797 500 Source: WSB-IASC Total 4,438,456 18,275 From the analysis of tables 1 and 2, the following conclusions are drawn: The budget of the Interamerican Region has been reduced 9.7% since fiscal year 2012-13, from US $ 779,931 to US $ 708,425 in 2017-18 (a difference of US $ 71,506). WOSM contribution has been reduced by 13.8% during the same period, from US $ 689,431 in 2012-13 to 594,000 in 2017-18 (a difference of US $ 95,431). During fiscal year 2017-18, regional fees only covered 2.6% of the budget of the Interamerican Region. It is very difficult to uphold that regional fees reflect the real payment of the NSOs, either in terms of membership or living standards within the country. Some NSOs only pay US $ 125 per year, which is not much more than the cost of the bank transfer. Therefore, the Working Group concludes that the current scheme of regional fees is not reasonable nor does comply with providing the means for the development of activities and for compliance with the agreements of the Interamerican Scout Conference. It is important to note that the current scheme of regional fees was established more than 15 years ago without having been determined according to a technical nature or a readjustment formula. Also, the WSB-IARSC has been carrying out actions to reduce expenses in an important way (tax exemption for its operations in Panama and commercial agreements with recurrent service providers to access better rates, among others) and thus be able to dedicate more resources to the technical assistance provided to NSOs and other similar activities. However, greater income is required to strengthen its operational capacity, which generates the formulation of a proposal for a new regional fees scheme now based on technical criteria. 4. Proposal for a new scheme of regional fees We have to take into account the considerable reduction in revenues of the Interamerican Region, the small percentage represented by regional fees and the current scheme was established without taking into account technical criteria, the Working Group has prepared a proposal for a new regional fee system. The principles guiding this proposal are two: 1. NSOs should contribute to the regional budget according to their possibilities. Page 4 de 11 REPORT OF THE 27 th Interamerican Scout Conference- Panama 2018

2. Regional fees should be estimated taking into account technical criteria. The technical criteria used to formulate this proposal are the membership of the NSOs and the standard of living of each country. The Working Group recognizes the results could be different if the fees are estimated according to alternative technical criteria. However, it considers that both the criteria used and the results obtained are reasonable, as shown by the analysis presented in Section 5 of this document. 4.1 Methodology Considering the enormous differences in membership and living standards among NSOs in the region, it is impossible to formulate a perfectly equitable rule to determine regional fees. Even more so, if it is taken into account the current fees were established without following technical criteria, which implies that any increase of these, even if it adequately reflects the true payment capacity of a NSO, can be considered as inequitable when compared with the current level. The Working Group, facing with this impossibility, used a methodology based on the criterion of reasonableness. First, it sought to establish what would be the minimum reasonable fee that an average NSO in the region should pay (in order to determine the minimum and maximum fees). Second, the group sought to establish a fee per member that allows differentiating between NSOs, according to the number of members and living standards of each country. Then, we compared the result with the impact it would have on the budget of the Interamerican Region. Finally, we analyzed the reasonableness of the result in terms of a tradable good (Coca-Cola can of 330ml) consumed throughout the region (which is an application of the economic principle of purchasing power parity). Step 1: Reasonable fee for an average NSO To establish what would be the minimum reasonable fee that an average NSO in the region should pay, the Working Group asked two questions: 1. What is the minimum reasonable fee that an average NSO in the region should pay? The Working Group determined, according to its collective criteria, that an average NSO should not pay as a regional fee less than US $ 100 per month (which implies US $ 1,200 per year). 2. Who should reasonably pay less? The Working Group determined that the only NSOs that would aspire to pay a lower fee are those countries who have a lower income and those countries with a membership fewer than 5,000. Table 3 shows the NSOs in the region by WOSM category and membership level. Table 3: NSO by WOSM category and membership level Category A Category B Category C Category D Haiti Brazil Argentina USA Nicaragua Colombia Mexico Canada Peru Chile Bahamas Bolivia Venezuela Curaçao Ecuador Costa Rica Aruba Guatemala Trinidad & Tobago El Salvador Panama Honduras Barbados Jamaica Uruguay Dominican Republic Grenada Paraguay Dominica Suriname Belize Guyana St. Lucia SVG NSO with membership between 1,000 and 5,000 to 31/Dec/2015 27th Interamerican Scout Conference Panama 2018 Page 5 of 11

NSO with fewer than 1,000 members to 31/Dec/2015 Source: WSB-IASC Step 2: Fee per member To establish a reasonable fee per member that allows differentiating between NSO according to the number of members and living standards of each country, the Working Group determined, according to its collective criteria, the following: 1. An average NSO should not pay less than US $ 0.03 (3 cents) per member. 2. The minimum quota per member should increase according to the standard of living of the country. To apply these criteria, a starting point of US $ 0.03 was used and was estimated how much would be the equivalent in each WOSM category. For this purpose, the median GNI per capita adjusted for the purchasing power parity of the countries of the region was calculated according to their WOSM category. The results of the application of these criteria are shown in Table 4. WOSM Category Table 4: Fee per member by WOSM category (US$) Median GNI per capita (PPP) by category of NSO Ratio between medians D 43,420 D to C: 2.57 14.4 C 16,885 C to B: 1.86 5.6 B 9,060 3.0 A 3,590 Source: Banco Mundial / World Bank Fee per member (US$ Cents) 2.57 times 1.86 times NSO belonging to category A: Proposed regional fees scheme A flat fee of US $ 600 per year, regardless of membership. NSO belonging to category B: A fixed fee of US $ 600 per year for NSO with less than 1,000 members. A fixed fee of US $ 900 per year for NSO with more than 1,000 but less than 5,000 members. One member fee of US $ 0.03 (3 cents) per year for NSO with more than 5,000 members. NSO belonging to category C: A fixed fee of US $ 600 per year for NSO with less than 1,000 members. One fee per member of US $ 0.056 (5.6 cents) per year, with a minimum of US $ 1,200, for NSO with more than 1,000 members. NSO belonging to category D: A fixed fee of US $ 600 per year for NSO with less than 1,000 members. One fee per member of US $ 0.144 (14.4 cents) per year, with a minimum of US $ 1,200, for NSO with more than 1,000 members. Page 6 de 11 REPORT OF THE 27 th Interamerican Scout Conference- Panama 2018

Likewise, a maximum fee of US $ 24,000 per year (20 times US $ 1,200) is proposed for any NSO regardless of the size of its membership. 4.2 Proposed scheme With the criteria described above, the proposal for a regional fee scheme would be as follows: The table 5 shows a summary of the proposal. Table 5: Proposal of regional fees according to the WOSM membership and category Category Less than 1,000 members Between 1,001 and 5,000 members Between 5,001 and 50,000 members More than 50,000 members D 600 14.4 cents per member; minimum US$ 1,200 C 600 5.6 cents per member; minimum US$ 1,200 B 600 900 3 cents per member; minimum US$ 1,200 A 600 600 600 600 4.3 Results Table 6 shows the proposed regional fees applied to each NSO. Table 6: Proposed regional fees Country Type Membership Dec 31, 2015 GNI per capita, PPP (2016) Regional Fee 2016-17 (US $) Fee Proposal (US $) USA D 3,969,321 58,030 4,000 24,000 Canada D 98,193 43,420 2,000 14,140 Bahamas D 1,551 22,090 400 1,200 Curaçao D 1,462 N.A. 400 1,200 Aruba D 506 N.A. 250 600 Argentina C 70,174 19,480 500 3,930 Mexico C 43,030 17,740 1,000 2,410 Chile C 20,801 23,270 1,000 1,200 Venezuela C 14,148 17,700 500 1,200 (2013) Costa Rica C 11,423 15,750 500 1,200 Trinidad & Tobago C 9,139 30,810 400 1,200 Panama C 2,615 20,990 525 1,200 Barbados C 2,419 16,070 150 1,200 Uruguay C 1,976 21,090 400 1,200 Grenada C 1,378 13,440 125 1,200 Dominica C 1,100 10,610 125 1,200 27th Interamerican Scout Conference Panama 2018 Page 7 of 11

Belize C 830 8,000 125 600 St. Lucia C 393 11,370 125 600 SVG C 230 11,530 125 600 Brazil B 90,102 14,810 1,000 2,703 Colombia B 14,153 13,910 400 1,200 Peru B 8,290 12,480 500 1,200 Bolivia B 7,355 7,090 125 1,200 Ecuador B 6,032 11,070 400 1,200 Guatemala B 5,152 7,750 1,000 1,200 El Salvador B 3,320 8,220 400 900 Honduras B 2,701 4,410 400 900 Jamaica B 1,727 8,500 250 900 Dominican Republic B 1,524 14,480 400 900 Paraguay B 1,086 9,060 250 900 Suriname B 787 13,720 125 600 Guyana B 424 7,860 125 600 Haiti A 43,618 1,790 125 600 Nicaragua A 1,496 5,390 125 600 Totals 4,438,686 18,275 75,682 It is important to note the following: This proposal would quadruple revenues of regional fees, from US $ 18,275 to US $ 75,682 per year. The more affluent NSOs would make a greater contribution, and the less affluent and/or lowmembership NSOs would make a smaller contribution. Category B NSOs would only pay a fee greater than US $ 1,200 if their membership exceeds 40,000. Those in category C would only do so if their membership exceeds 21,429 and those in category D if their membership exceeds 8,333. This represents an incentive for the growth of the membership, since a larger number of members implies a lower per capita fee. 4.4 Impact on the budget of the Interamerican Region As shown in Table 6, the application of the proposed fee scheme would quadruple the contribution of the NSOs to the Interamerican Region, raising the current amount from US $ 18,275 to US $ 75,982 (figure that can vary according to the membership of the NSO and GNI per capita of the countries). In percentage, the regional fee would represent 9.9% of the annual budget of the Interamerican Region (figure estimated according to the budget of the fiscal year 2017-18). This can be seen in Figure 1. Page 8 de 11 REPORT OF THE 27 th Interamerican Scout Conference- Panama 2018

Figure 1: Percentage contribution of income scheme proposed in the budget of the Interamerican Region (fiscal year 2017-18) Cuotas regionales/ Regional fees 9.9% WOSM allocation Aporte de OMMS 77.6% Other sources/ Otras fuentes 12.6% 4.5 Adjustment formula The Working Group recommends adjusting regional fees every three years. To do so, the latest available membership figures of NSO, inflation and Gross National Income per capita adjusted for purchasing power parity of each country must be taken into account. 5. Reasonableness analysis To determine the reasonableness of the proposal, the impact of the proposed regional fee scheme was analyzed in terms of Coca-Cola cans of 330ml. As indicated above, it is a tradable good consumed throughout the region, so the analysis is an application of the economic principle of purchasing power parity. Table 7 shows the price of a Coca-Cola can of 330ml in US dollars in all the countries of the region, where the information could be obtained. Table 7: Price of a Coca-Cola 330ml can (US$) 1 Country/País Price/Precio (US$) Argentina 0.53 Brazil 0.66 1 Prices in December 2015. These were obtained by the source of a major wholesale seller using a consistent methodology between countries. 27th Interamerican Scout Conference Panama 2018 Page 9 of 11

Source: GlobalBrandPrices.com. Canada 0.53 Chile 0.84 Colombia 0.61 Costa Rica 1.18 El Salvador 0.50 Guatemala 0.72 Mexico 0.45 Panama 0.75 Paraguay 0.74 Peru 1.11 Uruguay 0.83 USA 0.89 Table 8 shows how many Coca-Cola cans of 330ml a member per year represents the addition of the global quota and the proposed new regional quota. Table 8: World fee plus regional proposed fee in terms of cans of Coca-Cola of 330ml per member per year USA Uruguay Peru Paraguay Panama Mexico Guatemala El Salvador Costa Rica Colombia Chile Canada Brazil Argentina 0.42 0.38 0.37 0.55 0.70 0.86 0.81 1.14 1.23 1.10 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 1.37 1.45 1.45 2.24 As can be seen, the country in which the addition both fees has the greatest impact is Canada, with 2.24 cans of Coca-Cola a member per year. In the rest of the countries in the sample, it does not reach 1.5 cans a member per year. Not even in those corresponding to category B like Guatemala, Paraguay and Peru. There, the addition of the world and regional fees represents 1.1, 1.14 and 0.38 cans of Coca-Cola, respectively. The Working Group considers this result as an indicator that the proposed regional fee scheme is reasonable in terms of institutional effort. Page 10 de 11 27 th Interamerican Scout Conference- Panama 2018

6. Partial and/or temporary exceptions Considering the majority of the economies of the region depend to a greater or lesser extent on the prices of raw materials, it is reasonable to assume that countries in the region will go through economic crises from time to time. When crises are severe, demanding payments in hard currency can be counterproductive and affect the growth goal of the membership of a NSO. Therefore, it is proposed that the NSOs of countries that are going through a severe economic crisis have the option of requesting partial and/or temporary exemption from their financial obligations to the Region. For this, they will have to make a technical request supported to the Interamerican Scout Committee, which would have the power to determine a partial or total of the fee for a period. The following minimum criteria are recommended to analyze in an exception application for the regional quota: Magnitude and nature of the crisis (exchange rate, fiscal, natural disasters, social commotion). Opinions of multilateral organizations on the impact of the crisis on the economy of the country and/or availability of foreign currency. Impact of the crisis on the membership and/or finances of the NSO. Other data or facts that are considered relevant. 7. Recommendations The following are recommendations of the Working Group on the regional fee scheme for Interamerican Region: 1. Adopt the proposed regional fee scheme. 2. To stablish an exceptional period of three years in which the adjustments corresponding to fees of each NSO are applied progressively: 33% in the first year; 66% in the second and 100% in the third. 27th Interamerican Scout Conference Panama 2018 Page 11 of 11