Bernalillo (County of), New Mexico

Similar documents
City of Las Cruces, NM

Rio Rancho, NM. Credit Strengths. Sizeable and stable tax base. Healthy reserves. Manageable debt burden with rapid payout.

Volusia County School District (FL)

Columbia School District, MO

City of Albuquerque, New Mexico

Snohomish County Public Utility District 1

Sanger (City of) TX. Credit Strengths. Trend of growing reserve levels. Continued tax base growth. Favorable location 40 miles north of Dallas

Montgomery County, TX

Roselle Park Borough, NJ

Town of Beekman, NY. Credit Strengths. Solid reserve and liquidity levels. Low debt burden with rapid repayment. Credit Challenges

Socorro Independent School District, TX

Lubbock (City of), TX

Westport (Town of) CT

Socorro Independent School District, TX

Taos Municipal School District 1, NM

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa2 UND/Aa3 ENH to Roswell ISD (Chaves County), NM's GOULT bonds, Ser Sep 2018

State Outlook: Debt Affordability. NCSL Conference Gail Sussman, Managing Director

Findlay City School District, OH

Las Cruces School District 2, NM

Cherokee County Board of Education, AL

Massachusetts (Commonwealth of)

Weber School District, UT

Town of Easton, MA. Credit Strengths. Manageable long-term liabilities. Credit Challenges. Reliance on reserves to address budget gaps

Butler (Village of), WI

OECD Workshop on Data Collection

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A2 to 2016B & C Senior Bonds of Central Florida Expressway Auth. (CFX), FL; Outlook positive

Rating Action: Moody's Upgrades the City of Sacramento, CA's Lease Revenue Bonds to A1; Confirms Ser and Ser. 1993A at A2; outlook is stable

Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings

City of Oak Creek, WI

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa3 to West Virginia SBA's $44.4M Capital Improvement Ref. Rev. Bonds, Ser Global Credit Research - 08 Sep 2017

Special Tax: Transportation-Related

Township of Tredyffrin, PA

Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings in the European Union

Agenda. New Mexico School District Bond Ratings 9/8/17

George W. Kuhn Drainage District (Oakland County), MI

St. Mary's County, MD

West Fargo Public School District No. 6, ND

Bothell (City of) WA

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa3 to Trinity Health Credit Group's (MI) Ser bonds; outlook revised to stable

Newport News, VA. Summary Rating Rationale. Credit Strengths. Strong financial management. Credit Challenges. Below average demographics

Prince William County, VA

Park District of La Grange, IL

Bernalillo Municipal School District 1 (Sandoval County), NM

Rating Update: Moody's affirms Aa3 on Waukegan Park District, IL's GO debt

Celina Independent School District, TX

Newport News (City of) VA

Rockwall County, TX. Summary Rating Rationale. Credit Strengths. Above average socioeconomic indices. Credit Challenge

Hoover (City of), AL

Duquesne University, PA

Edison (Township of) NJ

Huffman Independent School District, TX

Concord Hospital, NH

City of Mesquite, TX

Alamogordo Municipal School District No. 1 (Otero County), NM

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Lowe's unsecured ratings to Baa1; P-2 commercial paper rating affirmed 12 Dec 2018

Somerset Hills School District, NJ

Siauliu Bankas, AB. Siauliu Bankas capital metrics will strengthen with EBRD s debt-to-equity conversion. ISSUER COMMENT 13 August 2018

City of Tega Cay, SC. Annual Comment on Tega Cay RATING. ISSUER COMMENT 23 March 2018

Port Jefferson Union Free School District, NY

Clovis Municipal School District 1 (Curry County), NM

Montgomery County, TX

WILTON (TOWN OF) CT. Update to credit analysis. Credit strengths. » Affluent residential tax base. Credit challenges

Dallas County Community College District, TX

Duquesne University of the Holy Spirit, PA

Evanston (City of), IL

New Issue: Moody's upgrades Edgewater, NJ's GO to Aa2: assigns MIG 1 to $15.4M in BANs

Mongolian Banking System

Prince William County, VA

Regional Economic Outlook

Cocoa (City of) FL. Update to credit analysis following assignment of Aa2 issuer rating. CREDIT OPINION 12 April Summary.

Metropolitan Water District of So. California

Underwriting standards for credit cards and auto loans tighten modestly, a positive

Celina Independent School District, TX

Connecticut (State of) State Revolving Fund

City of Oakland, CA. Update to Credit Analysis. CREDIT OPINION 19 April Summary

Findlay City School District, OH

Jersey City Community Charter School, NJ

Bexar County, TX. Exhibit 1 Assessed Valuation Gains Reflect Continued Economic Activity CLIENT SERVICES. Source: Bexar County, TX,

Allen Independent School District, TX

New Issue: Moody's assigns A1 to Ford County USD No. 443's (KS) GOs Series 2015-A and Series 2015-B

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades South Carolina Public Service Authority revenue bonds; rating outlook negative

US Local Government GO Debt Methodology

YMCA of Greater New York, NY

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A1 to UConn GO bonds supported by State of Connecticut; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 29 Mar 2018

Policy on the "SEC Rule 17g-7 of Representation and Warranties" (R&Ws)

Carroll (County of) MD

Wicomico County, MD. Credit Strengths. » Well-funded pension plan. Credit Challenges. Factors that Could Lead to an Upgrade

Cuyahoga County, OH. New Issue - Moody's Assigns Aa2 to Cuyahoga County, OH's Sales Tax Revenue Bonds. CREDIT OPINION 25 September 2017.

Township of Nutley, NJ

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Aa1 issuer and bond ratings of the International Finance Facility for Immunisation (IFFIm) with a stable outlook

Oakland (City of), CA

City of Isle of Palms, SC

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A1 to San Francisco Airport Commission, CA Series 2018B-G; outlook is stable 01 May 2018

Disruption in Higher Education: What Does It Mean For Credit Ratings

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago, IL

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades PGW (PA) to A3 from Baa1; Assigns A3 to $278.2 mil Gas Works Rev. Refunding Bds., 15th Series

Masconomet Regional School District, MA

Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines

New Rochelle City School District, NY

Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston

Transcription:

CREDIT OPINION Bernalillo (County of), New Mexico New Issue: Moody's Assigns Initial Aa2 to Bernalillo Co, NM's GRT Bonds, Ser. 2017A/B; Outlook is Stable New Issue Summary Rating Rationale Moody's Investors Service has assigned a Aa2 rating to the County of Bernalillo, NM's $31.7 million in Gross Receipts Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2017A and $11.4 million in Gross Receipts Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2017B. The outlook is stable. Contacts Heather Correia +1.214.979.6868 Analyst heather.correia@moodys.com Dan Steed AVP-Analyst dan.steed@moodys.com +1.415.274.1716 CLIENT SERVICES Americas 1-212-553-1653 Asia Pacific 852-3551-3077 Japan 81-3-5408-4100 EMEA 44-20-7772-5454 Assignment of the initial Aa2 rating is reflective of the county s large and stable economy; adequate legal provisions despite lack of debt service reserve fund; solid maximum annual debt service coverage; and, moderate historic revenue volatility, which is mitigated by the county's demonstrated willingness to implement and pledge additional revenue streams to the bonds. The rating also considers the broad-based nature of the sales tax pledge. Credit Strengths Sizeable economy Strong projected maximum annual debt service coverage Implementation and pledging of additional revenue streams Credit Challenges Tepid economic recovery post-recession Lack of Debt Service Reserve Fund 15 year hold harmless phase-out, which will mute revenue growth Rating Outlook The outlook reflects our expectation that the county s GRT collections will remain stable over the mid-term, reflective of a solid economic base, anchored by military installations and institutions of higher education. Factors that Could Lead to an Upgrade Significant increases in GRT collections, absent additional debt leveraging Further expansion of the local economy Factors that Could Lead to a Downgrade Material declines in GRT collections; weakening of the county s economy

Significant leveraging of the pledged revenue sources Key Indicators Exhibit 1 Bernalillo County, NM Credit Background Pledged Revenues County's GRT Legal Structure Additional Bonds Test 2.0x MADS Open or Closed Lien Open Lien Debt Service Reserve Fund Requirement No DSRF MADS Coverage Pro forma MADS Coverage (x) 3.8x Projected Trend Analysis Estimated Debt Outstanding ($000) Projected Revenues ($000) Projected Annual Debt Service Coverage (x) 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 204,463 188,740 172,047 156,278 140,474 5.3x 5.0x 5.3x 5.2x 5.2x Estimated debt (principal and interest) outstanding includes previously issued GRT bonds, which have the same revenue pledge, but different legal structure. Projected Annual Debt Service Coverage does not reflect expected utility savings per YESCO contract. Source: County Disclosure; Moody's Investors Service Detailed Rating Considerations Tax Base and Nature of Pledge: Large Tax Base Housing One-Third of the State's Population; Broad Sales Tax Pledge The county's economy and tax base will remain stable and sizeable over the mid-term given regional importance and institutional presence. Located in north central New Mexico (Aa1 negative), Bernalillo County encompasses the entire City of Albuquerque (Aa1 stable) and is home to approximately one-third of the state's population. The county's population has grown approximately 21.4% since 2000 to 675,551 residents in 2016. After experiencing modest assessed value declines in fiscal 2011 and 2013 correlated with the most recent economic recession, the county's tax base returned to slow, but positive, expansion from fiscal 2014 to 2017. The trend continues, with preliminary fiscal 2018 values of $15.9 billion, derived from a large full value of $47.8 billion, an increase of 2.1% yearover-year. Management anticipates the tax base will remain stable in the near future. Major ongoing development includes the Central New Mexico Rail Park, which will add 5,000 jobs; General Mills is expanding, adding 30 jobs; and, Facebook is building a large data center in Los Lunas. The August 2017 Moody's Economy.com Albuquerque report indicates that the economy is in recovery, and indicates that job growth will resume in late 2017, which should help unemployment fall to a cyclical low of 5% in 2019. Furthermore, the metro area will continue to benefit from UNM and state and federal government facilities. The report does note that the city's high-tech industries are being outpaced by their counterparts in Colorado, Utah and California, however, Major employers in the Albuquerque/Bernalillo County MSA include the University of New Mexico, Kirtland Air Force Base (AFB), and Sandia National Laboratories. The institutional presence provided by these entities is an anchor for the local economy. Healthcare and high-tech industries also have significant presence in the employment base. The county's August 2017 unemployment rate of 6.1% was below the state (6.4%) but above the nation (4.5%) for the same time-period. Resident wealth levels are average with per capita income and median family income (2015 American Community Survey) approximating 92.5% and 91% of national levels, respectively. The county's gross receipts tax (GRT) is considered a broad-based sale tax that is collected by the state and remitted to the county on a monthly basis. The GRT is imposed upon any person engaging in business in the county. This publication does not announce a credit rating action. For any credit ratings referenced in this publication, please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the most updated credit rating action information and rating history. 2

Debt Service Coverage and Revenue Metrics: Healthy Debt Service Coverage Anticipated The county's GRT collections will likely continue to modestly increase due to ongoing economic development coupled with management's willingness to implement and pledge additional sales tax revenue streams. Historically, collections have exhibited some volatility, both during the recession and federal sequestration. In fiscal 2016, the county implemented its first 1/8th hold harmless GRT, and pledged the revenues to the repayment of bonds. As such, revenues increased to $60.6 million, or 44% year-over-year. Likewise, in fiscal 2018, the county implemented and pledged its second 1/8th hold harmless increment, which is expected to increase total collections to $82.9 million, or 31.8%. The county does not intend to enact further increments at this time. Despite these material, one-time increases in collections, over the long-term, revenue growth is expected to be muted due to the 15-year hold harmless phase out. Starting in fiscal 2016, the State is slowly reducing its subsidy to cities and counties for GRT associated with food and medical purchases. Specific to Bernalillo, the cumulative loss over the next 15 years is projected to be around $89.8 million. With the sale of the Series 2017 bonds, maximum annual debt service (MADS) will increase to $16.9 million and occur in fiscal 2019. Fiscal 2017 unaudited revenues of $62.9 million will provide MADS coverage of 3.77 times. Fiscal 2018 budgeted revenues increase to $82.9 million, improving MADS coverage to 4.97 times. Annual debt service coverage averages around 4.00 times until 2027 before increasing to 20 times barring further leveraging. Debt service on the Series 2017B bonds is expected to be paid from utility savings. The county has entered into a contract with YESCO. This contract is being reviewed by the State, and will be voted on by the county commission in December. Based on YESCO's proforma projections, over the next 25 years, utility savings will be around $20.1 million. The debt, in turn, is structured to take advantage of these savings; debt service is effectively offset by utility savings. Assuming these savings are realized, MADS coverage, across all series, will increase to 3.90 times (based on fiscal 2017 revenues) and 5.14 times (based on the fiscal 2018 budgeted revenues). Exhibit 2 GRT Collections Double as County Implements Additional Taxes Historic Revenues were Flat, with Softening During the Recession GRT ($000) % Change YOY 90,000 50% 80,000 40% 70,000 60,000 30% 50,000 20% 40,000 30,000 10% 20,000 0% 10,000 - -10% 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018* *Budgeted revenues Source: County Disclosure Debt and Legal Covenants: Adequate Legal Provisions Despite Lack of Debt Service Reserve The county's GRT debt profile will likely remain manageable over the mid-term given no plans for additional debt and healthy annual debt service coverage, which mitigates the need for a reserve fund. The legal provisions of the current sale are adequate with a strong additional bonds test (ABT) at 2.00 times maximum annual debt service (MADS), countered by a lack of a debt service reserve. The county has an internal, commission-approved policy to maintain at least 4.00 times annual debt service coverage. 3

DEBT STRUCTURE The county has $102.1 million ($100.7 million rated by Moody's) in outstanding GRT bonds, which are secured by the same pledge, but have a different legal structure (unlike the Series 2017 bonds, all outstanding debt has a debt service reserve fund, funded with bond proceeds at the lessor of the three-prong test). Post-sale, the debt structure, inclusive of outstanding bonds, is front-loaded, with around 78% of all debt service retired in ten years. Annual debt service declines precipitously in 2028, from $15.7 million to $3.9 million. MADS occurs in 2019 at $16.7 million. DEBT-RELATED DERIVATIVES The county has no exposure to variable rate debt or interest rate swaps. Management and Governance New Mexico counties have an institutional framework score of A, or moderate. Counties receive the majority of their revenues from property taxes and gross receipts taxes, which in combination are moderately predictable. Most New Mexico counties are at the maximum O&M levy, but have a moderate level of ability to raise revenues through property tax rates or additional gross receipts taxes. Expenditures are moderately predictable and could experience some volatility due to jail and/or hospital expenses. Expenditure reduction ability for counties is moderate given high fixed costs. Bernalillo County operates under commission-manager form of government and provides for public safety, highways and streets, sanitation, cultural and recreational services, public improvements, planning and zoning, and general administrative services. Legislative and some executive power is vested in a five-member Board of County Commissioners, who are elected for four-year terms from single member districts. Administration is overseen by a County Manager, who has responsibility for 25 departments. Legal Security The bonds are special limited obligations, payable solely from, and secured by, an irrevocable and first lien (but not necessarily an exclusive first lien) upon the pledged revenues. Pledged revenues are defined as the 2/8th county GRT plus the 2/8th county holdharmless GRT less $1 million for indigent care. Use of Proceeds Proceeds from the Series 2017A bonds will be used to renovate the county's new administrative facility. Proceeds from the Series 2017B bonds will be used to implement energy conservation and renewable energy measures for the county s Metropolitan Detention Center. Obligor Profile Bernalillo County, the economic and population hub of New Mexico, is located in the north central region of the state at the conjunction of Interstate Highways 25 and 40. The county has roughly 676,000 residents. Its boundaries encompass the entire City of Albuquerque and is home to the University of New Mexico, Kirtland Air Force Base and Sandia National Laboratories. Methodology The principal methodology used in this rating was US Public Finance Special Tax Methodology published in July 2017. Please see the Rating Methodologies page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology. 4

Ratings Exhibit 3 Bernalillo (County of) NM Issue Rating Gross Receipts Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2017A Rating Type Sale Amount Expected Sale Date Rating Description Gross Receipts Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2017B Rating Type Sale Amount Expected Sale Date Rating Description Aa2 Underlying LT $31,740,000 10/24/2017 Special Tax: Non-Sales/ Non-Transportation Aa2 Underlying LT $11,130,000 10/24/2017 Special Tax: Non-Sales/ Non-Transportation Source: Moody's Investors Service 5

2017 Moody s Corporation, Moody s Investors Service, Inc., Moody s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, MOODY S ). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES ( MIS ) ARE MOODY S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE. MOODY S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody s publications. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY S. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. Moody s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody s Corporation ( MCO ), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody s Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading Investor Relations Corporate Governance Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy. Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY S affiliate, Moody s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to wholesale clients within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a wholesale client and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to retail clients within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use MOODY S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser. Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. ( MJKK ) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody s SF Japan K.K. ( MSFJ ) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization ( NRSRO ). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively. MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000. MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements. REPORT NUMBER 6 1094195

CLIENT SERVICES 7 Americas 1-212-553-1653 Asia Pacific 852-3551-3077 Japan 81-3-5408-4100 EMEA 44-20-7772-5454