Part A: Answer Question A1 (required) and Question A2 or A3 (choice).

Similar documents
Part A: Answer Question A1 (required) and Question A2 or A3 (choice).

Part A: Answer question A1 (required), plus either question A2 or A3.

Part A: Answer Question A1 (required) and Question A2 or A3 (choice).

The Facts of Economic Growth and the Introdution to the Solow Model

1 The Solow Growth Model

ECON 302: Intermediate Macroeconomic Theory (Spring ) Discussion Section Week 7 March 7, 2014

Intermediate Macroeconomics,Assignment 4

QUEEN S UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF ARTS AND SCIENCE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS. Economics 222 A&B Macroeconomic Theory I. Final Examination 20 April 2009

Final Exam - Answers April 26, 2004

Final Exam II ECON 4310, Fall 2014

ECN101: Intermediate Macroeconomic Theory TA Section

Homework Assignment #3 ECO 3203, Fall Consider a closed economy with demand for goods as follows:

Lastrapes Fall y t = ỹ + a 1 (p t p t ) y t = d 0 + d 1 (m t p t ).

Macro (8701) & Micro (8703) option

This paper is not to be removed from the Examination Halls

Macroeconomics. Review of Growth Theory Solow and the Rest

Economics 301 Final Exam. Prof. Daniel. December 17, Answer all questions. Each question is worth 20 points. LABEL EVERYTHING!!!

Introduction to economic growth (2)

Final Exam - Economics 101 (Fall 2009) You will have 120 minutes to complete this exam. There are 105 points and 7 pages

K and L by the factor z magnifies output produced by the factor z. Define

Dynamic Macroeconomics

Name: Intermediate Macroeconomic Theory II, Fall 2008 Instructor: Dmytro Hryshko Problem Set 2 (53 points). Due Friday, November 14

Econ 522: Intermediate Macroeconomics, Fall 2017 Chapter 3 Classical Model Practice Problems

Final Exam II (Solutions) ECON 4310, Fall 2014

ECON 3020: ACCELERATED MACROECONOMICS. Question 1: Inflation Expectations and Real Money Demand (20 points)

2014/2015, week 6 The Ramsey model. Romer, Chapter 2.1 to 2.6

Lecture Notes 1: Solow Growth Model

General Examination in Macroeconomic Theory SPRING 2016

Equilibrium with Production and Endogenous Labor Supply

Final Exam Solutions

004: Macroeconomic Theory

Name: Intermediate Macroeconomic Theory II, Fall 2009 Instructor: Dmytro Hryshko Final Exam (35 points). December 8.

STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY Department of Economics. Ph. D. Comprehensive Examination: Macroeconomics Fall, 2016

General Examination in Macroeconomic Theory. Fall 2010

Intermediate Macroeconomic Theory II, Winter 2009 Solutions to Problem Set 2.

Intermediate Macroeconomics,Assignment 3 & 4

I. The Solow model. Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. September 2015

STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY Department of Economics. Ph. D. Preliminary Examination: Macroeconomics Fall, 2009

Lecture Notes. Macroeconomics - ECON 510a, Fall 2010, Yale University. Fiscal Policy. Ramsey Taxation. Guillermo Ordoñez Yale University

WRITTEN PRELIMINARY Ph.D EXAMINATION. Department of Applied Economics. Spring Trade and Development. Instructions

14.02 Quiz 3. Time Allowed: 90 minutes. Fall 2012

Part B (Long Questions)

I. The Solow model. Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Autumn 2014

14.05 Lecture Notes. Endogenous Growth

Revision Lecture Microeconomics of Banking MSc Finance: Theory of Finance I MSc Economics: Financial Economics I

I. The Solow model. Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Autumn 2014

Charles Engel University of Wisconsin

Growth. Prof. Eric Sims. Fall University of Notre Dame. Sims (ND) Growth Fall / 39

Macroeconomics Exam & Solution, UPF/BGSE MSc Economics Professor Antonio Ciccone

Part 1: Short answer, 60 points possible Part 2: Analytical problems, 40 points possible

ECO 4933 Topics in Theory

Equilibrium with Production and Labor Supply

Econ 8602, Fall 2017 Homework 2

Technical change is labor-augmenting (also known as Harrod neutral). The production function exhibits constant returns to scale:

Problem Set #2. Intermediate Macroeconomics 101 Due 20/8/12

STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY Department of Economics. Ph. D. Comprehensive Examination: Macroeconomics Spring, 2013

Chapter 2 Savings, Investment and Economic Growth

Eco504 Fall 2010 C. Sims CAPITAL TAXES

CHAPTER SEVEN - Eight. Economic Growth

WRITTEN PRELIMINARY Ph.D EXAMINATION. Department of Applied Economics. Trade, Development and Growth. January For students electing

The Ramsey Model. Lectures 11 to 14. Topics in Macroeconomics. November 10, 11, 24 & 25, 2008

Overlapping Generations Model: Dynamic Efficiency and Social Security

Optimal Negative Interest Rates in the Liquidity Trap

1 Dynamic programming

This paper is not to be removed from the Examination Halls UNIVERSITY OF LONDON

1 A tax on capital income in a neoclassical growth model

Chapter URL:

Introducing nominal rigidities. A static model.

Topic 7. Nominal rigidities

Ramsey s Growth Model (Solution Ex. 2.1 (f) and (g))

Intermediate Macroeconomic Theory / Macroeconomic Analysis (ECON 3560/5040) Midterm Exam (Answers)

Chapter 7. Economic Growth I: Capital Accumulation and Population Growth (The Very Long Run) CHAPTER 7 Economic Growth I. slide 0

Queen s University Faculty of Arts and Science Department of Economics ECON 222 Macroeconomic Theory I Fall Term 2012

ECON 2123 Problem Set 2

2nd Exam Macroeconomics IBA

UNIVERSITY OF OSLO DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS

STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY Department of Economics. Ph. D. Comprehensive Examination: Macroeconomics Spring, 2016

Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program June 2017

Supplement to the lecture on the Diamond-Dybvig model

General Examination in Macroeconomic Theory SPRING 2014

14.02 Principles of Macroeconomics Spring 06 Quiz 2

TOBB-ETU, Economics Department Macroeconomics II (ECON 532) Practice Problems I (Solutions)

A Two-sector Ramsey Model

SDP Macroeconomics Final exam, 2014 Professor Ricardo Reis

General Examination in Microeconomic Theory SPRING 2014

A Baseline Model: Diamond and Dybvig (1983)

For students electing Macro (8701/Prof. Roe) & Micro (8703/Prof. Glewwe) option

Macroeconomics I, UPF Professor Antonio Ciccone SOLUTIONS PROBLEM SET 1

ECON Chapter 6: Economic growth: The Solow growth model (Part 1)

Appendix: Common Currencies vs. Monetary Independence

STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY Department of Economics. Ph. D. Comprehensive Examination: Macroeconomics Fall, 2010

Midterm Exam. Answers

SAMPLE EXAM QUESTIONS FOR FALL 2018 ECON3310 MIDTERM 2

Lecture 7: Optimal management of renewable resources

Final Exam (Solutions) ECON 4310, Fall 2014

Online Appendix for Revisiting Unemployment in Intermediate Macro: A New Approach for Teaching Diamond-Mortensen-Pissarides

14.02 Quiz 1, Spring 2012

Lecture 2 General Equilibrium Models: Finite Period Economies

UNIVERSITY OF OSLO DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS

Lecture 1: A Robinson Crusoe Economy

Transcription:

Ph.D. Core Exam -- Macroeconomics 7 January 2019 -- 8:00 am to 3:00 pm Part A: Answer Question A1 (required) and Question A2 or A3 (choice). A1 (required): Short-Run Stabilization Policy and Economic Shocks In response to economic shocks, policymakers often try to stabilize output in the short run. The appropriate stabilization policy depends on the type of shock, the degree of openness or capital mobility, and many other factors. Using the short-run/keynesian IS-LM model (i.e., wages/prices are sticky or fixed; the capital stock and technology are constant), analyze the effects of random IS shocks and determine the best policy response under the following scenarios. 1. Closed Economy: Consider the following stochastic IS-LM model with static inflationary expectations and random IS shocks. (1) Y = E(Y-T,R,G) + ε where 0 < E Y T < 1, E R < 0, E G = 1, ε ~ N(0,σ 2 ) (IS) (2) M/P = L(Y,R) where L Y > 0, L R < 0 (LM) The variables are: Y = real output, E = aggregate expenditures, T = taxes, R = r = interest rate, G = government purchases, M = nominal money supply, P = (fixed) price level, L = real money demand, and ε = random expenditure shock in the goods market. a) Illustrate graphically and calculate/sign the relevant partial derivatives to show how this closed economy responds to a negative expenditure shock in the goods market (ε < 0). b) In the face of random expenditure shocks in the goods market, what is the best monetary policy to stabilize output in the short run? Discuss. 2. Small Open Economy: Consider a stochastic Mundell-Fleming model with perfect capital mobility, static inflationary expectations, static exchange rate expectations, and random domestic IS shocks. a) Using graphical analysis, explain carefully how/why this small open economy responds to a negative expenditure shock in the domestic goods market (ε < 0) under both fixed and flexible exchange rates. b) In the face of random expenditure shocks in the domestic goods market, what is the best exchange rate policy to stabilize domestic output in the short run? Discuss.

A2 (choice): Physical Capital and the Long Run Physical capital plays an important role in long-run economic analysis. You are asked to analyze the effects of a ceteris paribus change in a country s capital stock in the context of the following models. 1. Classical/Long-Run Model: Consider the following aggregate supply/demand model where wages and prices are flexible, inflationary expectations are static, and technology is fixed. (1) W/P = F N (N,K) where F NN < 0, F NK > 0 (labor demand) (2) N = NS(W/P) where NS W/P > 0 (labor market equilibrium) (3) Y = F(N,K) where F N > 0, F K > 0 (production function) (4) Y = E(Y-T,R,G) where 0 < E Y T < 1, E R < 0, E G = 1 (IS) (5) M/P = L(Y,R) where L Y > 0, L R < 0 (LM) The variables are: W/P = real wage, N = employment/labor, K = capital stock, Y = real output, E = aggregate expenditures, T = taxes, R = r = interest rate, G = government purchases, M = nominal money supply, P = price level, and L = real money demand. Suppose a natural disaster destroys part of the country s capital stock. a) Illustrate graphically how the endogenous variables are affected. b) Explain carefully how/why the endogenous variables are affected. 2. Solow Growth Model: Consider the following Solow model with a Cobb-Douglas production function. (1) Y = K a (AL) 1-a where 0 < a < 1 (production function) (2) dk/dt = sy δk where 0 < s < 1, 0 < δ < 1 (capital accumulation) (3) dl/dt = nl where n > 0 (labor accumulation) (4) da/dt = ga where g > 0 (technical progress) The variables are: Y = total output, A = labor-augmenting technology, K = capital stock, L = labor force, a = income share of capital, n = population growth rate, s = saving rate, δ = depreciation rate, g = rate of technical progress. a) Calculate the level of output per worker and the growth rate of output per worker in steady-state. b) Now suppose a natural disaster destroys part of the country s capital stock. (i) Show graphically and explain carefully how/why output per effective worker is affected over time. (ii) Using time series graphs and verbal explanations, discuss what happens to the level of output per worker and the growth rate of output per worker over time.

A3 (choice): Statements Select any three of the following statements and explain carefully why each is true, false, or uncertain in all its parts. You must use graphical and/or mathematical analysis to support your arguments. Your score depends on the quality and completeness of your explanations. a) In a closed economy, whether the Fisher effect is full or partial depends entirely on the degree of wage and price flexibility. b) In a stochastic world, whether the optimal policy is a fixed rule or a feedback rule depends entirely on the nature of the uncertainty. c) According to the Solow growth model, output per worker tends to be higher in countries with high saving rates, high skill ratios, high levels of technology, and high population growth rates, all else equal. d) In the R&D growth model, a ceteris paribus increase in the share of labor employed in the R&D sector will permanently raise the growth rate of output per worker.

Part B: Answer Both Questions. B1. Taxation in the Ramsey Model Consider the Ramsey model of an economy in competitive equilibrium. There is a representative household and a representative firm. The household s utility functional is U where there is no population growth, and >0. ˆ 1 0 ln c t e t dt, The representative firm has a constant returns to scale per worker production function f(k t )=Akt. For simplicity, assume capital does not depreciate after production ( = 0). At every point in time, the household must pay a fraction of its income to the government. Find the competitive equilibrium of this economy, using the following steps. a) Write down representative household s maximization problem, solve it, and derive the 4 equations that characterize the solution. Explain in words, intuitively, what the Hamiltonian function means, and what the 4equationsrepresent.Does show up here? Explain why or why not? b) Write down firm s maximization problem and the first-order conditions for this problem. Translate these conditions into intensive form. Derive the 2 equations that characterize the solution. Does show up here? Explain why or why not? c) What are the 3 equilibrium conditions for this economy? Does show up here? Explain why or why not? d) Combine your answers to parts a) - c) and derive a pair of differential equations for the variables c and k. e) Draw the phase diagram, carefully identifying (and deriving mathematically) all the important points. f) Do the following comparative dynamics exercise: 0 >.Explain why there is no need to assume that the substitution effect dominates the income effect. As usual, the baseline economy starts in its steady state at time t =0. The modified economy starts at time t =0(with the same amount of capital as the baseline economy. Remember that capital is the state variable!). Draw (i) the phase diagram for both cases, indicating what is different, and (ii) the time paths of c and k for both cases. In interpreting your results, notice that we completely ignored what the government may do with the tax revenues. For simplicity, we de facto assumed that the government wasted the taxes, "dumped them into the ocean", or "opened a Swiss bank account" with them. Thus, there is no positive effect of government spending countering the income tax.

B2. Financial Intermediation Consider the Diamond-Dybvig model with two assets. There are three periods: t =0, 1, 2. Agents are ex-ante identical. They are endowed one unit of a single good at t =0,andnothingatt =1, 2. At the beginning of t =1, afraction 1 of agents learn that they prefer to consume only at t =1, while a fraction 2 of agents prefers to consume only at t =2. There is a linear production technology whereby one unit of the good invested in period 0 yields R>1 units of the good at time 2. This technology is illiquid, in the sense that an investment that is interrupted in period 1 generates r <1 units of consumption. In addition, there is a liquid storage technology, whose return is equal to 1 in both periods. Agents are expected utility maximizers, their preferences are given by where <1 is a discount factor, and >0. U = 1 c 1 1 1 1 + 2 c 1 2 1 1 (1) a) Write down the problem of an agent in autarky, the FOC, and the optimal consumption vector (c 1,c 2 ). b) Now suppose that in period 1, after agents learn their idiosyncratic consumption preference shock and before they consume, a financial market opens where agents can trade claims for the returns on the illiquid production technology. Let p be the price of a bond that yields one unit of the illiquid production technology at t =2. Write down the problem of an agent in this setting. What will the equilibrium price of a bond be in this case (and why)? What is the consumption vector (c 1,c 2 )?Discuss. c) Now, instead of a financial market, suppose agents form coalitions, which they call banks, and pool their resources. Write down the problem of the bank, the FOC, and the optimal consumption vector. Briefly compare with a) and b). d) Under what conditions can multiple equilibria exist? Define narrow banking in this context. Is it preferred to autarky? Discuss. What about suspension of convertibility?