The New Zealand Longitudinal Study of Ageing

Similar documents
Fact Sheet Families Package

CHILD POVERTY: SEVERITY AND PERSISTENCE

THE FAMILY CENTRE SOCIAL POLICY RESEARCH UNIT. Submission to the Social Services and Community Select Committee on the Child Poverty Reduction Bill

Poverty and Income Inequality in Scotland: 2013/14 A National Statistics publication for Scotland

International comparison of poverty amongst the elderly

The impact of rising housing costs on Accommodation Supplement recipients

The New Zealand tax system and how it compares internationally

Coversheet: Distributional analysis

NEW ZEALAND. 1. Overview of the tax-benefit system

Regional Income Inequality Indicator. May 2011

Budget 2008 Personal Tax Package

POVERTY IN AUSTRALIA: NEW ESTIMATES AND RECENT TRENDS RESEARCH METHODOLOGY FOR THE 2016 REPORT

Social impact assessment of the main welfare and direct tax measures in Budget 2013

IRELAND. to be fully unemployed for at least 3 days in any period of 6 consecutive days;

Regulatory Impact Statement

Progressive universalisation of Working for Families

IFS. Poverty and Inequality in Britain: The Institute for Fiscal Studies. Mike Brewer Alissa Goodman Jonathan Shaw Andrew Shephard

Findings of the 2018 HILDA Statistical Report

RESTRICTED: STATISTICS

Income Distribution Database (

THE DYNAMICS OF CHILD POVERTY IN AUSTRALIA

Poverty figures for London: 2010/11 Intelligence Update

Income Inequalities and Poverty

A NEW POVERTY BENCHMARK FOR BASIC INCOME SCHEMES by ANNIE MILLER

Poverty and income inequality in Scotland:

An Analysis of Public and Private Sector Earnings in Ireland

THE STATISTICAL REPORT

HILDA PROJECT TECHNICAL PAPER SERIES No. 1/14, March Derived Income Variables in the HILDA Survey Data: The HILDA Survey Income Model

Coversheet: Increasing the minimum wage

Dynamics of Income and Deprivation in New Zealand,

Household incomes in New Zealand: Trends in indicators of inequality and hardship 1982 to 2015

INDICATORS OF POVERTY AND SOCIAL EXCLUSION IN RURAL ENGLAND: 2009

MINIMUM ESSENTIAL STANDARD OF LIVING & NATIONAL MINIMUM WAGE INADEQUACY

NEW ZEALAND Overview of the tax-benefit system

Payroll Calculations & Business Rules Specification 1 April 2019 to 31 March 2020

Working Paper Fiscal Sustainability In An Ageing Population: Adapting Universal Provision

Copies can be obtained from the:

Credit crunched: Single parents, universal credit and the struggle to make work pay

ANNUAL REPORT for the Child Poverty Strategy for Scotland

GST - MEANING OF PAYMENT

MONITORING POVERTY AND SOCIAL EXCLUSION IN WALES 2013

Reducing Child Poverty Lessons from other countries. Jonathan Boston School of Government Victoria University of Wellington

8-Jun-06 Personal Income Top Marginal Tax Rate,

child poverty in New zealand

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Paid Parental Leave Cost Estimates based on drafting of the Bill... 3

Modelling of the Federal Budget Personal Income Tax Measures

Living Alone Payment

Changes to work and income around state pension age

Social Security Income Measurement in Two Surveys

Housing, poverty and employment

Regulatory Impact Statement Minimum Wage Review 2016

PayBiz Superannuation NZ

Date: 23 November 2017 Security Level: Cabinet Sensitive. Hon Carmel Sepuloni, Minister for Social Development

THE COST OF HOUSING AND HOUSING SUPPORT

UNITED KINGDOM Overview of the system

What is the Minimum Income Standard (MIS) in the UK and how has it been used to inform policy?

Joint IRD/MSD/Treasury Report: Approach to non-standard tax codes in the compensation package

Effects of taxes and benefits on UK household income: financial year ending 2017

Public Health Monograph Series No. 28 ISSN

A Briefing from The Children s Society The Distributional Impact of the Benefit Cap

INCOME DISTRIBUTION AND INEQUALITY MEASURES IN SINGAPORE

Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet

EVIDENCE ON INEQUALITY AND THE NEED FOR A MORE PROGRESSIVE TAX SYSTEM

Submission on the Child Poverty Reduction Bill and changes to the Vulnerable Children Act 2014 March 2018

The Dynamics of Multidimensional Poverty in Australia

Fair Work Commission Fair Work Act Annual Wage Review Submission in Reply by the Australian Catholic Council for Employment Relations

Income Poverty. Chris Belfield 16 th July Institute for Fiscal Studies

New Zealand s Social Assistance System: Financial Incentives to Work

Modelling the distributional aspects of KiwiSaver: methodology and results

Peter Whiteford. University of NSW

UNITED KINGDOM The UK Financial year runs from April to April. The rates and rules below are for June 2002.

Introduction. Income, living standards and work. September, 2008

The Child and Dependent Care Credit: Impact of Selected Policy Options

1.1 To increase the adult minimum wage from $15.75 to $16.50 per hour from 1 April 2018; and

Chair, Cabinet Economic Growth and Infrastructure Committee

PENSIONS AT A GLANCE 2009: RETIREMENT INCOME SYSTEMS IN OECD COUNTRIES AUSTRALIA

child poverty in new zealand

Households Below Average Income (HBAI) Quality and Methodology Information Report

Linking a Dynamic CGE Model and a Microsimulation Model: Climate Change Mitigation Policies and Income Distribution in Australia*

Examples of what the settlement means for employees

Household Stimulus Package

INEQUALITY UNDER THE LABOUR GOVERNMENT

Tax Reduction and Social Policy Bill Part 1 - Tax Rate Reductions

REFORM OF INCOME TAX IN AUSTRALIA: A LONG-TERM AGENDA

Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet

Income Inequality in Canada: Trends in the Census

KiwiSaver and Superannuation policy

Public economics: Inequality and Poverty

Modelling the impact of policy interventions on income in Scotland

Q&A on tax relief technical information

How the Ross Plan Would Raise Rents on HUD-Assisted Households

ICI RESEARCH PERSPECTIVE

Estimating the Distortionary Costs of Income Taxation in New Zealand

Proposed tax rules for migrating companies

NETHERLANDS the earnings related benefit (half a year up till 5 years depending on employment record),

The Effects of Personal Income Taxation on Income Inequality in Australia

The use of linked administrative data to tackle non response and attrition in longitudinal studies

Family Resources Survey and related series update. Surveys Branch Department for Work and Pensions

Taxation (Income-sharing Tax Credit) Bill

John Hills, Francesca Bastagli, Frank Cowell, Howard Glennerster, Eleni Karagiannaki and Abigail McKnight

Transcription:

The New Zealand Longitudinal Study of Ageing Technical Report - Treatment of Income Data from the 2012 Survey Wave - Peter King 2014 A research collaboration between The Health and Ageing Research Team, School of Psychology, Massey University The Family Centre Social Policy Research Unit The Foundation for Research, Science and Technology

Treatment of NZLSA income data 2 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 4 DATA RECORDING... 5 NUMBERS OF PEOPLE IN HOUSEHOLD... 7 EQUIVALISATION... 7 INLAND REVENUE DEPARTMENT INCOME TAX RATES INFORMATION... 7 TAX CALCULATION FORMULAS... 8 A FURTHER EXPLANATION OF EQUATION CONTENT... 10 EXCEL FORMULA STATEMENTS... 11 INCOME POVERTY... 11 INCOME AND POVERTY DATA... 11 REFERENCES... 14 2

Treatment of NZLSA income data 3 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1. CASES IN WHICH PERSONAL INCOME WAS USED TO STAND FOR HOUSEHOLD INCOME BECAUSE HOUSEHOLD INCOME HAD NOT BEEN RECORDED IN ONE PERSON HOUSEHOLDS... 4 TABLE 2. CASES IN WHICH PERSONAL INCOME WAS USED TO STAND FOR HOSUEHOLD INCOME BECAUSE HOUSEHOLD INCOME WAS LOWER THAN PERSONAL INCOME... 5 TABLE 3. CASES IN WHICH INCOME AMOUNT WAS NOT RECORDED BUT SOLE DECLARD SOURCE OF INCOME WAS NZ SUPER AND THIS WAS IMPUTED AS INCOME... 5 TABLE 4. CASES WITH DATA ENTRY OR RECORDING ERRORS... 7 TABLE 5. PAYE RATES FOR THE YEAR 1 APRIL 2012 TO 31 MARCH 2013... 8 TABLE 6. THE INCOME AND POVERY DATA IN SPSS... 12 3

Treatment of NZLSA income data 4 Introduction Data Recording The NZLSA first wave postal questionnaire recorded personal and household income data. Respondents recorded personal and household income separately, and could provide the amounts as either before tax or after tax, and either weekly, fortnightly, monthly, or annual. They also provided housing costs in the same variety of forms. At the data preparation stage, all recorded amounts were annualised and conversions carried out produced total before and after tax income amounts and annual housing costs. The procedures used to transform the recorded data are documented in a separate report. Two issues were identified with the information recorded by respondents that led to further work needing to be carried out during the preparation of income data for analysis. There were 66 where the respondent was the only income recipient and had recorded personal income but not household income. In those cases, the household income was assumed to be equal to the personal income. The ID s of these 66 cases are listed in Table 1. Table 1. Cases in which personal income was used to stand for household income because household income had not been recorded in one person households (66). Case Numbers NZL0036 NZL1001 NZL1693 NZL2213 NZL3263 NZL3642 NZL0178 NZL1064 NZL1696 NZL2515 NZL3268 NZL3648 NZL0203 NZL1155 NZL1714 NZL2535 NZL3338 NZL3677 NZL0214 NZL1289 NZL1920 NZL2609 NZL3354 NZL3724 NZL0382 NZL1308 NZL1994 NZL2710 NZL3367 NZL3813 NZL0569 NZL1340 NZL2054 NZL2854 NZL3447 NZL3826 NZL0615 NZL1560 NZL2057 NZL3087 NZL3459 NZL3923 NZL0766 NZL1583 NZL2074 NZL3139 NZL3465 NZL4014 NZL0769 NZL1617 NZL2136 NZL3142 NZL3524 NZL4066 NZL0779 NZL1665 NZL2154 NZL3225 NZL3589 NZL4139 NZL0894 NZL1686 NZL2193 NZL3242 NZL3616 NZL4145 4

Treatment of NZLSA income data 5 In 126 cases recorded household income was lower than recorded personal income. There are two possible reasons why this might have happened: 1) the household income amount did not include the respondent s personal income or 2) the respondent transposed personal and household income when completing the questionnaire. During the first wave, such cases were assumed to result from the first reason and the personal income amount was added to the household amount to arrive at a total household income. However, in order to avoid that happening for the second wave the wording of the income questions was refined to minimise the chance of respondents not including their personal income in the household amount. Accordingly, for this second wave the reason for the discrepancy has been assumed to be the second one set out above, i.e., that those personal and household amounts were transposed. In those cases the recorded household income amount was replaced by the recorded personal income amount. The ID s of these 126 cases are listed in Table 2. Table 2. Cases in which personal income was used to stand for household income because household income was lower than personal income (126). Case Numbers NZL0050 NZL0574 NZL1317 NZL2091 NZL2637 NZL3637 NZL0054 NZL0633 NZL1370 NZL2096 NZL2798 NZL3689 NZL0055 NZL0709 NZL1397 NZL2120 NZL2807 NZL3736 NZL0080 NZL0727 NZL1457 NZL2123 NZL2916 NZL3760 NZL0134 NZL0789 NZL1464 NZL2132 NZL2920 NZL3793 NZL0135 NZL0804 NZL1483 NZL2134 NZL2991 NZL3798 NZL0144 NZL0848 NZL1487 NZL2145 NZL3090 NZL3820 NZL0150 NZL0862 NZL1528 NZL2155 NZL3099 NZL3870 NZL0187 NZL0867 NZL1695 NZL2195 NZL3148 NZL3894 NZL0228 NZL0897 NZL1724 NZL2287 NZL3180 NZL3912 NZL0230 NZL0903 NZL1805 NZL2300 NZL3261 NZL3973 NZL0231 NZL0989 NZL1810 NZL2304 NZL3275 NZL4016 NZL0312 NZL1050 NZL1822 NZL2313 NZL3337 NZL4026 NZL0346 NZL1078 NZL1839 NZL2327 NZL3479 NZL4057 5

Treatment of NZLSA income data 6 NZL0403 NZL1081 NZL1840 NZL2329 NZL3489 NZL4067 NZL0438 NZL1083 NZL1981 NZL2358 NZL3543 NZL4122 NZL0446 NZL1126 NZL2001 NZL2394 NZL3553 NZL4154 NZL0494 NZL1153 NZL2024 NZL2473 NZL3578 NZL4176 NZL0495 NZL1202 NZL2026 NZL2511 NZL3592 NZL4225 NZL0530 NZL1203 NZL2048 NZL2606 NZL3602 NZL4229 NZL0563 NZL1227 NZL2078 NZL2626 NZL3624 NZL4327 In addition to those changes, there were 36 cases in which income amount was not recorded but sole declared source of income was NZ Super. In these cases income was imputed according to current NZ Super rates. The ID s of these 36 cases are listed in Table 3. Table 3. Cases in which income amount was not recorded but sole declared source of income was NZ Super and this was imputed as income (36). Case Numbers NZL0215 NZL3273 NZL0273 NZL1329 NZL3384 NZL1399 NZL0601 NZL3718 NZL0277 NZL1374 NZL3879 NZL1738 NZL0635 NZL4049 NZL0458 NZL1597 NZL4147 NZL1746 NZL1065 NZL4100 NZL0624 NZL2647 NZL4214 NZL3302 NZL1919 NZL0030 NZL1034 NZL2818 NZL4215 NZL4099 NZL2593 NZL0049 NZL1084 NZL3314 NZL0213 NZL0014 Finally, three cases had discrepancies which were clearly the result of either data entry or recording errors and they were altered accordingly (see Table 4). Users of the data might choose to exclude these cases from their analyses. 6

Treatment of NZLSA income data 7 Table 4. Cases with data entry or recording errors. NZLID Variable Change NZL3860 INBTPERmnth04 60,000 to 6,000 NZL1981 INBTPERweek04 7,000 to 700 NZL0036 Calculated Annual household disposable income changed $1 to match personal amount. 35,483 to 35,583 Numbers of People In Households Q63 asked about the numbers of people in the household. This question records the household composition in terms of the numbers and types of people in the household in addition to the respondent, and whether they are under or over 18 years of age. Respondents only have an opportunity to count themselves if they live alone. Consequently, the respondent is only recorded when they live alone and in order to ensure they are counted in all households, one has been added to the numbers aged over 18 in all households containing other people in addition to the respondent. Equivalisation All household incomes were equivalised to a two adult household level using the Jensen Revised Equivalence Scales (Jensen, 1988). These distinguish between adults and children, with children being defined as those aged less than 18. In contrast with the first wave survey, the equivalisation process was straightforward because the household composition question was modified to ensure that numbers of household members aged below 18 were distinguished from those aged 18 or over. Inland Revenue Department Income Tax Rates Information Calculations of tax payable on gross income were based on the tax rates in effect during the current tax year 1 April 2012 to 31 March 2013 (the period within which the survey was conducted) shown in Table 5. Income tax calculations are based on the PAYE rates in the third column of Table 5 which shows the total deduction after the addition of the ACC Earners levy to the PAYE. The ACC Earners levy is currently set at 1.7 percent and applied equally to all income levels. 7

Treatment of NZLSA income data 8 Table 5. PAYE rates for the year 1 April 2012 to 31 March 2013. Taxable income Income tax rates for every $1 of taxable income (excluding ACC earners' levy) PAYE rates for every $1 of taxable income (including ACC earners' levy 1 ) up to $14,000 10.5 cents 12.20 cents from $14,001 to $48,000 17.5 cents 19.20 cents from $48,001 to $70,000 30 cents 31.70 cents $70,001 and over 33 cents 34.70 cents Source: Inland Revenue 1 In order to simplify the process of calculating net and gross values with different income values and PAYE rates four sets of conversion formulas have been derived, and these are defined in the following section. Tax Calculation Formulas Four sets of formulas were derived, one for each of the four income brackets listed in Table 5. In the formulas, gross and net incomes are indicated, respectively, by the letters G and N. Formulas are shown for converting gross income to net and for converting net to gross. The formulas (shown in bold italic type) were derived as shown below. 2 In the first line of the working for deriving each formula, each sub-bracket contains the dollar amount covered by one tax bracket shown in Table 5, column 1 and the associated tax plus ACC rate shown in column 3 of Table 5. A further explanation of the content of the first line of each set of equations is provided at the end, using the first set as an example. It must be emphasised that each formula is only valid for the income range to which it applies. In other words, the value of G in any particular case must be less than the value of the lowest income covered by the next highest tax bracket except that there is no upper limit for income covered by the highest tax rate (i.e., for incomes over $70,001). 1 http://www.ird.govt.nz/how-to/taxrates-codes/itaxsalaryandwage-incometaxrates.html 2 Standard algebraic bracket expansion operations are used. 8

Treatment of NZLSA income data 9 1. If Gross income is $70,001 and above N = G [(G-70000)*0.347 + (22000*0.317) + (34000*0.192) + (14000*0.122)] = G [(G - 70000)*0.347 + 15210] = G [(G 70000)*0.347] 15210 = G 0.347G + 24290 15210 So N = 0.653G + 9080 And (if Net income is in the range: $54,790.65 3 and above) G = (N 9080) / 0.653 2. If Gross income is in the range: $48,001-$70,000 N = G [(G - 48000)*0.317 + (34000*0.192) + (14000*0.122)] = G [(G-48000)*0.317 + 8236] = G [(G 48000)*0.317] 8236 = G 0.317G + 15216 8236 So N = 0.683G + 6980 And (if Net income is in the range: $39,764.68 - $54,790.00) G = (N 6980) / 0.683 3. If Gross income is in the range: $14,001-$48,000 N = G [(G - 14000)*0.192 + (14000*0.122)] = G [(G - 14000)*0.192 + 1708] 3 I.e., the net value of $70,001 gross. 9

Treatment of NZLSA income data 10 = G [(G 14000)*0.192] 1708 = G 0.192G + 2688 1708 So N = 0.808G + 980 And (if Net income is in the range: $12,292.81 - $39,764.00) G = (N 980) / 0.808 4. If Gross income is in the range: $0 - $14,000 N = G - (G*0.122) so N = 0.878G And (if Net income =<$12,292.00) G = N / 0.878 A Further Explanation of Equation Content Using the first line of set 1, above, as an example, the term (G 70000) represents the result of subtracting the threshold value of $70,000 from the value of the total income received (when that income is greater than $70,000). The resulting income over the threshold of $70,000 is taxed at 34.7 percent, including the ACC earner s levy, which is expressed as 0.347 in the equation. The second term, (22000*0.317) represents the tax on the $22,000 of income between $48,000 and $70,000 ($70,000 - $48,000 = $22,000) that is taxed at 31.7 percent (or 0.317), including the ACC earners levy. The third term, (34000*0.192) represents the tax on the $34,000 of income between $14,000 and $48,000 ($48,000 - $14,000 = $34,000) that is taxed at 19.2 percent (or 0.192), including the ACC earners levy. The fourth and final term, (14000*0.122) represents the tax on the first $14,000 of income that is taxed at 12.2 percent (or 0.122), including the ACC earners levy. The subsequent lines in each set of equations document the steps by which the final, simplified, conversion formulae were derived. 10

Treatment of NZLSA income data 11 Excel Formula Statements The formulas set out above can be combined in the following Excel statements, one of which converts gross income to net, and the other which converts net income to gross. Gross to net income: =IF(AND(N<=14000),N*0.878,IF(AND(N>14000,A2<=48000),N*0.808+980,IF(AND( N>48000,N<=70000),N*0.683+6980,IF(N>70000,N*0.653+9080,)))) Net to gross income: =IF(AND((G<=12292),G/0.878,IF(AND((G>12292.81,G<=39764),(G- 980)/0.808,IF(AND((G>39764.68,G<=54790),(G-6980)/0.683,IF(G>54790.65,(G- 9080)/0.653,)))) Income Poverty Households have been categorised as below or above the income poverty line according to three measures using the constant value (CV) medians calculated and published by MSD in 2012 (Perry, 2012) and equivalised disposable household income. The medians are annualised versions of weekly figures published in Tables E3 and E4 (p. 96) of the MSD report for two adults (i.e., the Couple only household type). The three poverty measures included in the dataset are, respectively, before housing cost poverty, after housing cost poverty using after housing cost (MSD calculated) median based on actual housing costs, and another after housing cost poverty measure based on a median that is equal to the before housing cost median minus 25 percent. Income and Poverty Data Table 6 lists and explains the variables created and added to the NZLSA Postal Survey SPSS master file. 11

Treatment of NZLSA income data 12 Table 6. The income and poverty data in SPSS. Variables from the data file 1 NZLSA_ID NZLSA participant ID 2 Over_18 Household members aged 18 or over 3 Under_18 Household members aged under 18 4 Total_persons Total number of people in household including respondent 5 bt_pers_total Before tax personal income 6 at_pers_total After tax personal income 7 bt_hh_total Before tax household income 8 at_hh_total After tax household income 9 Ann_house Housing cost (annual) 10 net_hh_less_house Household income minus housing cost 11 Incl_hh_inc_filter Screener for excluding cases with no recorded household income 12 equiv_scale Jensen equivalence value 13 equiv_bhc_2a Equivalised before housing cost household income 14 equiv_ahc_2a Equivalised after housing cost household income 15 pov_bhc Before housing cost poverty using 60% CV 2007 ($2011) BHC median ($46,000) 16 pov_ahc After housing cost poverty using 60% CV 2007 ($2011) AHC median ($34,667) 17 pov_ahc_25pc After housing cost poverty using 60% CV 2007 ($2011) AHC median ($46,000 minus 25%) 12

Treatment of NZLSA income data 13 11 Screening variable to exclude cases for which income and/or housing data are unavailable or are negative. Code = 2 selects cases Notes 15 Code = 1 indicates below poverty 60% CV BHC line. 16 Code = 1 indicates below poverty 60% CV AHC line. 17 Code = 1 indicates below poverty 60% CV AHC line where median is BHC median minus 25%. Median in parentheses is 100% median value not the 60% threshold CV (constant value) medians are from Tables E3 and E4, Perry (2012:96) 13

Treatment of NZLSA income data 14 References Jensen, J. (1988) Income Equivalences and the Estimation of Family Expenditures on Children, New Zealand Department of Social Welfare. Perry, J. (2012) Household Incomes in New Zealand: Trends in Indicators of Inequality and Hardship 1982 to 2011, Wellington: Ministry of Social Development 14