Case No IV/M Nordic Capital / Euroc. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 18/04/1996

Similar documents
Case No IV/M Nordic Capital / Transpool. REGULATION (EEC)No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 23/08/1995

Case No IV/M CODAN / HAFNIA. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date:

Case No IV/M HALIFAX / CETELEM. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 26/02/1999

Case No IV/M IVO / STOCKHOLM ENERGI. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 05/08/1998

Case No IV/M AEGON / SCOTTISH EQUITABLE. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date:

Case No IV/M ING / Barings. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 11/04/1995

Case No IV/M CREDIT SUISSE / NIKKO / MSA. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 14/08/1998

Case No IV/M AHOLD / JERONIMO MARTINS. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date:

Case No IV/M MESSER GRIESHEIM / HYDROGAS. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 23/10/1997

Case No IV/M ERC / NRG VICTORY. REGULATION (EEC)No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date:

Case No IV/M Mitsubishi Bank / Bank of Tokyo. REGULATION (EEC)No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 17/07/1995

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Case No IV/M Inchcape plc / Gestetner Holdings PLC. REGULATION (EEC)No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 01/06/1995

Case No COMP/M AHLSTROM / CAPMAN / FOLDING CARTON PARTNERS. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No IV/M Sun Alliance / Royal Insurance. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 18/06/1996

Case No IV/M Chase Manhattan / Chemical Banking Corporation. REGULATION (EEC)No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No IV/M BHF / CCF / CHARTERHOUSE. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date:

Case No IV/M NORTHERN TELECOM / MATRA TELECOMMUNICATION. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No IV/M Grand Metropolitan / Cinzano. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 07/02/1992

Case No COMP/M FORTIS / ASR. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 13/12/2000

Case No IV/M EDON / ROVA / RECO. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/08/1998

Case No IV/M DUPONT / HITACHI. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/10/1997

Case No COMP/M NEWHOUSE / JUPITER / SCUDDER / M&G / JV. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No IV/M THOMSON / SIEMENS / ATM. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 18/07/1997

Case No IV/M Swiss Bank Corporation / S.G. Warburg. REGULATION (EEC)No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 28/06/1995

Case No IV/M BLOHM + VOSS / LISNAVE. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 18/06/1998

Case No IV/M RTZ / CRA. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Also available in the CELEX database Document No 395M0660

Case No IV/M BOREALIS / IPIC / OMV / PCD. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/07/1998

Case No IV/M DEL MONTE / ROYAL FOODS / ANGLO AMERICAN. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No IV/M BS / BT. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(a) INAPPLICABILITY Date:

Case No COMP/M DUPONT / TEIJIN. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/11/1999

Case No IV/M Unisource / Telefónica. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(a) INAPPLICABILITY Date: 06/11/1995

Case No COMP/M DUPONT / SABANCI. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/11/1999

Case No IV/M ARVIN / SOGEFI. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date:

Case No IV/M Zeneca / Vanderhave. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 09/04/1996

Case No COMP/JV.17 - MANNESMANN / BELL ATLANTIC / OPI. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 21/05/1999

Case No IV/JV.4 - VIAG / ORANGE UK. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 11/08/1998

Case No COMP/M EDP / CAJASTUR / CASER / HIDROELECTRICA DEL CANTABRICO. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No IV/M Channel Five. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Also available in the CELEX database Document No 395M0673

Case No COMP/M ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND / ALFRED C. TOEPFER INTERNATIONAL / INTRADE. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/JV.28 - SYDKRAFT / HEW / HANSA ENERGY TRADING. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No IV/M ELENAC / HOECHST. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/11/1998

Case No COMP/M BT / ESAT. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(2) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 27/03/2000

Case No COMP/M MANNESMANN / ORANGE. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 20/12/1999

Case No IV/M METALLGESELLSCHAFT / SAFIC ALCAN. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date:

Case No COMP/M CANDOVER / CINVEN / GALA. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 14/03/2003

Case No IV/M GEC Alsthom / Tarmac / Central IMU. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 18/04/1996

Case No COMP/M CINVEN LIMITED / ANGEL STREET HOLDINGS. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/M BAYER / LYONDELL. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 21/02/2000

Case No COMP/M SWISS RE / GE INSURANCE SOLUTIONS. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/04/2006

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Case No COMP/M ADM / ACTI. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 11/02/2002

Case No COMP/M OUTOKUMPU / NORZINK. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 27/03/2001

Case No COMP/M GOLDMAN SACHS / TPG LUNDY / BROOKGATE. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/M.3334 ARCELOR/ THYSSENKRUPP/ STEEL24-7. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 16/02/2004

Case No COMP/M BP / VEBA OEL. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(2) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 01/07/2002

Case No COMP/M AAEC/ RABO INVESTMENTS/ VECELIA/ HVEG. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/M MAPFRE / SALVADOR CAETANO / JV'S. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 20/04/2009

IV/M ADM / ACATOS & HUTCHESON - SOYA MAINZ

Case No COMP/M BLACKSTONE/ CAMBOURNE/ GOLDMAN SACHS/ ROTHESAY. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No IV/M SWEDISH MATCH / KAV. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 18/12/1997

Case No COMP/M LOTTE GROUP/ ARTENIUS UK LIMITED. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 19/03/2010

Case No IV/M BRITISH STEEL / EUROPIPE (See also M.501) REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/M HOCHTIEF/ GEOSEA/ BELUGA HOCHTIEF OFFSHORE JV. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case M PEUGEOT / BNP PARIBAS / OPEL VAUXHALL FINCOS

Case No COMP/M BPI / EULER HERMES / COSEC. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 29/03/2006

Case No COMP/M APAX/ KINETIC CONCEPTS. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 07/10/2011

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Guidelines on national regional aid for (OJ C 54, , p. 13).

In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32015M7763

Case No COMP/M DEUTSCHE BANK / ACTAVIS. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 22/09/2010

Case No COMP/M HEINEKEN / SCOTTISH & NEWCASTLE ASSETS. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No IV/M Akzo Nobel / Monsanto. REGULATION (EEC)No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 19/01/1995

Case No COMP/M WIENER BÖRSE ET AL. / BUDAPEST STOCK EXCHANGE / BUDAPEST COMMODITY EXCHANGE / KELER / JV

In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32018M8888

Case M FORTUM / LIETUVOS ENERGIJA / JV. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 23/11/2015

Case No COMP/M GE / BAYER / OSi Europe Business. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 04/05/2006

-)( Iii SOUTH AFRICA. Brussels, 15 June 1995 Ref: Nigg - jv\tcr\safrica XV-A-2 .'Q -:,...

In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32014M7207

Case M ALLIANZ / LV GENERAL INSURANCE BUSINESSES. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 18/10/2017

Case No COMP/M IF P&C/ TOPDANMARK. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 23/09/2013

Case No COMP/M IBERDROLA / SCOTTISH POWER. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 26/03/2007

Case No COMP/M MONTAGU/ GIP/ GREENSTAR. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 03/08/2010

In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32016M7818

Case M PILLARSTONE / FAMAR. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 03/05/2017

Case No COMP/M HUNTSMAN INTERNATONAL / ALBRIGHT & WILSON SURFACTANTS EUROPE. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Brussels, 13.IX.2006 C(2006) 3980 final. State aid N 434/2006 Slovenia Regional aid map Sir, 1.

Case No COMP/M BANCO SANTANDER / RAINBOW. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 15/10/2010

Case No COMP/M.4070 LONDON SOUTH EASTERN RAILWAY / THE INTEGRATED FRANCHISE. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/M GOLDMAN SACHS/ TPG LUNDY/ BRITANNIA LIVING GROUP LIMITED. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case M WARBURG PINCUS / GENERAL ATLANTIC / UNICREDIT / SANTANDER / SAM / PIONEER

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION

In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32016M7762

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. State aid N 209/2001 Ireland Guarantee for borrowings of the Housing Finance Agency

Case No COMP/M DSM / SINOCHEM / JV. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 19/05/2011

Banks in Sweden. Facts about the Swedish banking market. Contents

REGULATION (EC) 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE

Official Journal of the European Communities

Case No COMP/M VODAFONE AIRTOUCH / MANNESMANN. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 12/04/2000

COMMISSION DECISION of 19 February 1997 setting out measures in order to restore effective competition (Case No IV/M.784 -Kesko/Tuko)

Case No COMP/M METRONET / INFRACO. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 21/06/2002

Transcription:

EN Case No IV/M.732 - Nordic Capital / Euroc Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 18/04/1996 Also available in the CELEX database Document No 396M0732 Office for Official Publications of the European Communities L-2985 Luxembourg

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 18.04.1996 PUBLIC VERSION MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION To the notifying parties: Dear Sirs, Subject : Case No IV/M.0732 - Nordic Capital/Euroc Notification of 12.03.1996 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation No 4064/89 1. On 12 March 1996 Atle AB (Atle), Investment AB Bure (Bure), Allmänna Pensionsfonden 4:e fondstyrelsen (AP4:e), Handelsbanken Livförsäkringsaktiebolag (SHB), Livförsäkringsaktiebolaget Skandia (Skandia) (-these companies are hereinafter referred to as "the Investors"), represented by Nordic Capital Svenska AB (see also case No IV/M.625 - Nordic Capital/Transpool), and Swedetech Ltd (Swedetech) jointly notified a transaction whereby they will acquire joint control of the company Euroc Bygghandel AB. 2. After examination of the notification, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the functioning of the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 4064/89. Rue de la Loi 200 - B-1049 Brussels - Belgium Telephone: exchange (+32-2)299.11.11 Telex: COMEU B 21877 - Telegraphic address: COMEUR Brussels

- 2 - I. THE PARTIES Investor companies 3. Atle is a Swedish investment company whose business strategy is to invest - directly as well as indirectly - through other venture capital organizations, in small and mediumsized Swedish companies. Atle has more than 70 such investments of which most are in companies with less than 500 employees. Investments are spread over a large range of sectors such as food, leisure, wastehandling, engineering and information technology. 4. Bure is a Swedish investment company which currently has interests in the engineering industry and in the production of food (confectionery). 5. AP4:e is the fourth fund of the Swedish General Pension Fund which is a public organization whose activity consists of investing pension funds for various profitable purposes. The General Pension Fund consists of five independent entities (Boards) each of which has its own board of directors. The parties have confirmed that only the fourth and the fifth board are allowed to invest in shares of companies and comparable securities, and that there is no coordination of the activities of the voting rights in a particular company. Furthermore, AP4:e is only allowed to have at most 10% of the capital or voting rights in a company which shares are listed on a stock exchange. 6. SHB is ultimately owned by Svenska Handelsbanken. Svenska Handelsbanken is a Swedish banking group with a universal range of banking services. It is also active in the area of life assurance. 7. Skandia is ultimately owned by Försäkringsaktiebolaget Skandia. Försäkringsaktiebolaget Skandia is a Swedish group of companies which is active in life assurance, non-life insurance and reinsurance. 8. Swedetech Ltd (Jersey) is ultimately owned by Atle. Swedetech Ltd is an investment company investing in small and medium sized industrial enterprises. Acquired company 9. The target company of the operation is Euroc Bygghandel AB. The owner of Euroc Bygghandel is ultimately Euroc AB, Sweden's largest building materials group. Euroc Bygghandel is a relatively small company in this group. It has nine subsidiaries located in the southern parts of Sweden with a number of outlets selling products to the building/construction industry. In addition to this, Euroc Bygghandel is also active on the wholesale market for mainly sawn and planed wood. A limited part of the activities also include sales and services of floors. II. THE OPERATION 10. The Investors have authorized Nordic Capital Svenska AB (Nordic Capital) to act on their behalf in the operation. Nordic Capital is an investment company jointly controlled by Atle, Bure, AP4:e, SHB and Skandia. Nordic Capital structures and recommends structural investments and buy-outs to its parent companies. The Investors and Swedetech will acquire all the shares in Euroc Bygghandel from Euroc Trade and thereby obtain joint control of Euroc Bygghandel. The investor companies' shares of Euroc Bygghandel will be distributed as follows:

- 3 - Atle 16% Bure 12% AP4:e 12% SHB 4% Skandia 20% Swedetech 36% III. THE CONCENTRATION 11. Euroc Bygghandel is an existing company with all the assets and resources necessary to enable it to perform all the functions of an autonomous economic entitity. The operation involves a change from sole control by one company to joint control by six companies of Euroc Bygghandel. The resulting joint venture has a concentrative character within the meaning of the Merger Regulation. According to the shareholders' agreement the Investors will jointly be entitled to appoint three out of eight board members and Swedetech two board members. In addition to this the Investors and Swedetech are entitled to jointly appoint two board members. The Managing Director shall also be a member of the board. 12. As regards resolutions by the Board of Directors, unanimity among the five boardmembers appointed by the Investors and Swedetech as mentioned above is required in decisions regarding the appointment of or dismissal of the managing director, the adoption of budget or financial statements and decisions regarding acquisitions and sales of shares and other assets as well as investments or other expenditures exceeding 23 million ECU. 13. Since none of the Investors and Swedetech are involved in or related to any of the markets of Euroc Bygghandel the acquisition will not give rise to coordination of the competitive behaviour between the investors companies or between them and Euroc Bygghandel. IV. COMMUNITY DIMENSION 14. The undertakings concerned have an aggregate worldwide turnover of more than ECU 5 billion. Moreover, at least two of the companies involved have a Community-wide turnover in excess of 250 million ECU. Of these companies at least one does not achieve more than two-thirds of its aggregate Community-wide turnover within one Member State. The notified operation therefore has a Community dimension. V. COMPATIBILITY WITH THE COMMON MARKET A. Relevant product and geographic markets 15. It is not necessary to define the relevant product and geographic markets since even on the widest or narrowest definition of these markets the present concentration would not raise any competition problems.

- 4 - B. Assessment 16. There is no overlap in the present case since the Investors and Swedetech are not engaged in business activities in the same product market, or in a product market which is related to a product market in which anyone of them is active. Therefore, no addition of market shares will result from the concentration. For the above reasons, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the functioning of the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 4064/89. For the Commission,