Affordable Housing Fees Study

Similar documents
hello! & introductions

Fiscal Impact Analysis

OFFICE OF COUNCILMEMBER MYRTLE COLE FOURTH COUNCIL DISTRICT MEMORANDUM

Palo Alto Grade Separation Financing White Paper

Inclusionary Affordable Housing Program

D R A F T M E M O R A N D U M

California Tax Credit Allocation Committee Low Income Housing Tax Credits. Lisa Vergolini Deputy Director

Appendix A REAL ESTATE MARKET DEMAND ESTIMATE METHODOLOGY

FINANCING STRATEGIES FOR LIVABLE COMMUNITIES AARP Livable Communities National Conference Dallas, Texas November 15, 2017

CRENSHAW & AMENDED CRENSHAW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS

MEMORANDUM. Jobs and Fiscal Revenues - North Mare Island

Strengthening DC s Inclusionary Zoning

W Colden Ave, Los Angeles Fully Occupied Duplex, Great Cap Rate & Cash-Flow + Significant Additional Upside Potential

Basics of Municipal Finance: Revenue Sources, Debt Financing, and Spending and Debt Limitations

Affordable Housing Policy Recommendations

Aspen Place at the Sawmill Fiscal Impact Analysis

ECONOMIC ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES PAPER

Local Economic Report. Winter 2011

San Francisco Multi-Purpose Venue Project. Fiscal Impact Analysis: Revenues. Draft Report. Prepared for: The City and County of San Francisco

Affordable Housing Dedicated Fund. Safehouse Committee Presentation August 17, 2016

California $ Monthly Rent Affordable to Selected Income Levels Compared with Two-Bedroom FMR

Policy CIE The following are the minimum acceptable LOS standards to be utilized in planning for capital improvement needs:

City, County, and State Policies and Actions that Build Community Wealth

CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

CHICAGO TITLE BAY AREA ZONE 4 RESIDENTIAL (1-4) SCHEDULE OF TITLE & ESCROW FEES. For use in the following counties:

Fiscal Analysis of the City of Palo Alto 2030 Comprehensive Plan

Arizona Low Income Housing Tax Credit and Housing Trust Fund Economic and Fiscal Impact Report

LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES - CITY ATTORNEYS SPRING CONFERENCE. Short-Term Rental Regulatory Issues

PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. March 5, 2012 COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION. Bay Commercial Bank RSSD #

Sacramento County Housing Trust Fund. Annual Report. for. January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016

Westwood Country Club Redevelopment

FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CHENEY/HAGERTY/KUSHNER TRACT TOWNSHIP OF CRANBURY MIDDLESEX COUNTY, NEW JERSEY.

City of Antioch Development Impact Fee Study

TABLE I APCHA HOUSEHOLD INCOME TARGET LEVELS PER CATEGORY. TABLE II MAXIMUM GROSS INCOME AND NET ASSETS PER HOUSEHOLD APCHA Rental Units

Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH) Ordinance

San Francisco's Experience With Business Tax Reform. Ted Egan, Ph.D. Chief Economist City and County of San Francisco

Exhibit A DRAFT Measure A1 Implementation Policies Rental Housing Development Fund & Innovation and Opportunity Fund

Central SoMa Area Plan:

Magnolia Walk Affordable Housing Sales Release Procedures

Local Economic Report

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

Local Economic Report

Central City Impact Fee

Thompson & Trautz LLC. Ever Vail Fiscal Impact Report

Introduction to Monarch Realty Advisors

Presented By: Doug Herzbrun Managing Director January 26, 2000

PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. August 20, 2007 COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Tasman Drive Santa Clara, California 95054

Outlook 2018: IE and Southern California So Cal Economic Summit Corona Chamber of Commerce March 29, 2018

City of Long Branch. Pier Village Phase 3 RAB Financing August 28, 2012

General Fund Revenue Overview

California Economic Overview Fall 2013

MACQUARIE COUNTRYWIDE TRUST

Welcome to the Land of OZ: An Introduction to Opportunity Zones

Memo to the Planning Commission HEARING DATE: JANUARY 17, 2019

Proposed Symphony Park TID. January 20, 2015

Analysis of Operating Results and Financial Condition

(REVISED) NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING

An Economic Analysis Of the Madison Park Financial Project

PUBLIC SERVICES AND PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN SALINAS FUTURE GROWTH AREA. November 12, 2007

Red Wing Housing & Redevelopment Authority

INLAND EMPIRE REGIONAL INTELLIGENCE REPORT. School of Business. Fourth Quarter 2018 CENTER FOR ECONOMIC FORECASTING & DE VELOPMENT

Is the bounce for real? Christopher Thornberg Principal, Beacon Economics

ECONOMIC AND FISCAL IMPACTS OF TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT AT GOLD LINE FOOTHILL EXTENSION PASADENA STATIONS

2015 End of Year Economic Update

County of Sonoma: Local Economic Report

PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. July 30, 2012 COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION. AltaPacific Bank RSSD #

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT

2015 ANNUAL REPORT MISSION STATEMENT

2016 CALIFORNIA ECONOMIC & MARKET FORECAST. November 18, 2015 Newport Beach AOR Leslie Appleton-Young, Vice President & Chief Economist

CITY OF PASADENA FISCAL YEAR 2017 REVISED SCHEDULE OF TAXES, FEES, AND CHARGES

2016 Economic Impact of Tourism in Morgan County. Methodology, Metrics and Evaluation

FROM: CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: PLANNING AND COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT DATE: SEPTEMBER 11, 2006 CMR: 346:06

Local Government Incentives for Earthquake-Resilient New Buildings

REVISED ADOPTED REVISED FY2017 FY2018 FY2018 MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION RATE RATE RATE

METRO COMPARISONS AUSTIN, LOS ANGELES, NEW YORK & SAN FRANCISCO

FOR SALE Long Term, Kaiser Leased Medical Building

Rural Development. Connecting the Dots to Homeownership on Indian Reservations

CYCLE FORECAST Real Estate Market Cycles Third Quarter 2017 Estimates November 2016

TAX CREDITS 101. (How to Know Just Enough to Get You In Trouble)

CITY OF PASADENA ADOPTED FISCAL YEAR 2019 SCHEDULE OF TAXES, FEES, AND CHARGES

Highlands Spin-Off & Student Housing Transaction Webcast. January 18, 2016

Small Building Participation Loan Program

LEGEND Bridges Parks Fire Stations Project Locations Libraries Schools A

Appendix A Housing Sites Inventory

Market Assessment and Economic and Fiscal Impact Analysis of the Cumberland Community Improvement CUMBERLAND CID DECEMBER 2009

2016 Economic Impact of Tourism in Tippecanoe County. Methodology, Metrics and Evaluation

Reasonable Modification from the Planning Code

Measure A1 Implementation Policies Rental Housing Development Fund & Innovation and Opportunity Fund

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE 2013 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN AUSTIN NOVEMBER 2016

30 Year Fixed 40 Year Fixed. Option First Loan Type & Term First Loan Rate Downpayment & Closing Costs Assistance 8A 6.40% Non-Repayable Grant:

Emerging Trends in Real Estate Navigating at Altitude

Mammoth Lakes Town Council Agenda Action Sheet Agenda Item # 1 ~ FileNo 0 SO Council Meeting Date: April 1, 2015 Date Prepared: March 23, 2015 Prepare

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT:

California Housing Market Update. Monthly Sales and Price Statistics November 2017

Dreams Deferred: Impacts and Characteristics of the California Foreclosure Crisis

North Fair Oaks Zoning Workgroup Fair Oaks Community Center February 15, 2017

MEMORANDUM. Date: July 28, 2011; amended August 31, 2011

Analysis of Operating Results and Financial Condition

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTERDEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE

Outlook Southwest Regional Economic Forecast Conference June 14, 2018

Transcription:

Affordable Housing Fees Study presented to City of Petaluma presented by Darin Smith August 6, 2018 Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. One Kaiser Plaza, Suite 1410, Oakland, CA 94612 510.841.9190

What are inclusionary housing and in-lieu fees? Inclusionary policy requires builders to restrict a certain number of units for households at certain incomes In-lieu fees typically calculated to provide the subsidy to produce new units if the developer does not provide on-site High in-lieu fees may encourage the production of units rather than paying the fee Law does not appear to require an in-lieu fee option Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 1

Inclusionary housing Is... Common Most Bay Area jurisdictions have some form of an inclusionary housing requirement Many jurisdictions are revisiting both fee levels and underlying policies to potentially increase standards Effective Thousands of units have been created through inclusionary One of few ways to address affordable housing for middleincome households But does affect project feasibility, and Only one of several resources used to create affordable units Tax Credit programs support much new construction New State resources created and on the way Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 2

How do inclusionary housing and in-lieu fees affect housing prices? Inclusionary policies typically require some units to be sold/rented at prices below their production costs If not offset by other cost savings, inclusionary requirement or corresponding fees demands higher market-rate unit prices than would otherwise be required for feasibility If resulting prices exceed market acceptance, fewer units are built BUT, the primary factors in market-rate housing prices are construction costs and consumers demand and ability to pay Even eliminating inclusionary would reduce housing costs by only a few percentage points, not fundamentally lower prices Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 3

How would fee increases affect housing development feasibility? Overall fee burden (not just housing fees) is a factor in housing prices and feasibility Few alternatives exist to funding many capital improvements required or expected to serve a growing population Developers forecast unit costs and achievable prices when acquiring land and arranging project financing Common to set a future date for fee increases, allow projects in entitlement process before that date to pay the current fees Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 4

How are in-lieu fees typically spent? Fees are typically collected and mixed with other funds as: Local match for new affordable housing construction Acquisition or preservation of existing units Other programs assisting in providing housing to lower-income residents Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 5

What local alternatives to inclusionary are available? Commercial linkage fees, typically used ALONG WITH inclusionary policies Special taxes to fund affordable housing (e.g., parcel tax, sales tax, etc.) typically ALONG WITH inclusionary policies General Fund appropriations (very uncommon as the primary source) Dedication of public land for affordable housing Local density bonus that enhances feasibility beyond State law Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 6

Petaluma s Current Housing Requirements Inclusionary Policy Requirement Applies to For-Sale Housing 15% total, split between Low and Moderate Income For rental projects, City negotiates project-specific requirements Fee levels Inclusionary in-lieu fee varies by square feet of development ($4.51 per sq.ft. for a 2,000 sq.ft. home) Rental fee varies by square feet of development ($4.78 per sq.ft. for a 1,020 net sq.ft. apartment) Commercial linkage fees (adopted 2003; adjusted annually since 2012): $2.42/SF for Office $4.17/SF for Retail/Restaurant $2.49/SF for Industrial Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 7

Fee Updates Reflect Financing Gap to Build Affordable Housing Very Low Income (50% AMI) Cost per Unit = $376,000 Supportable Unit Value = $107,182 Affordability Gap = $268,818 Low Income (80% AMI) Cost per Unit = $376,000 Supportable Unit Value = $237,000 Affordability Gap = $139,000 Moderate Income (120% AMI) Cost per Unit = $376,000 Supportable Unit Value = $312,636 Affordability Gap = $63,364 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 8

In-Lieu Fee Calculation for Residential Development Current on-site requirement is 15%, split between Low and Moderate Income Calculated in-lieu fee as equal to 20% inclusionary requirement, to encourage on-site units Item Low (80% AMI) Moderate (120% AMI) Total per Affordable Unit In-Lieu Fee per Market-Rate Unit Units 10 10 20 20 100 Value/Unit $237,000 $312,636 Total Value $2,370,000 $3,126,364 $5,496,364 Costs/Unit $376,000 $376,000 Total Costs $3,760,000 $3,760,000 $7,520,000 Subsidy per Unit $139,000 $63,364 Total Subsidy Required $1,390,000 $633,636 $2,023,636 $101,182 $20,236 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 9

In-Lieu Fee Alternatives for Residential Development 15% 18% 20% 100 unit project pays for 15 BMRs Subsidizes same number of BMRs required on-site Fee/Market- Rate Unit = $15,177 100 unit project pays for 18 BMRs Maintains 15% affordability (18 BMRs/118 total = 15%) Fee/Market- Rate Unit = $18,213 100 unit project pays for 20 BMRs Encourage onsite or produce more BMR units than would onsite Fee/Market- Rate Unit = $20,236 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 10

Housing In-Lieu Fee Comparison Map of Surveyed Jurisdictions Also Included: Sonoma County Napa County Sacramento County Assumes Unit = 2,000 Sq.Ft. Fee / Sq.Ft. Fee / Unit Petaluma (Current Fee) $4.51 $9,022 Petaluma (EPS 15%) $7.59 $15,177 Petaluma (EPS 20%) $10.12 $20,236 Low Fee $2.07 $4,132 High Fee $17.62 $35,242 Median Fee $5.47 $10,940 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 11

Recommended Inclusionary In-Lieu Fee Maintain 15% Inclusionary Requirement, In-Lieu Fee = 20% Equivalent Meet 15% Inclusionary Requirement (7.5% low-income units + 7.5% moderate-income units) OR Pay In-Lieu Fee $10.12 per sq.ft. (Cost of 20% Requirement) or Other Means of Compliance Subject to Council Approval Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 12

Commercial Linkage Nexus Calculations New businesses Additional job creation Lower income employees need affordable housing Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 13

Commercial Linkage Example Item Example Employment Category Lodging Industry Accommodation (NAICS Code 721000) Occupation Category Buildings and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance Nationwide Median Income for Occupation $25,050 Regional Wage Adjustment Factor for Occupation 117.9% Median Wage Estimate for the Santa Rosa MSA $29,531 Workers per Household 1.69 Median Income per Household $49,898 Income Category for 3-person Family Low Income - up to 80% AMI Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 14

Commercial Linkage Fee Comparison Map of Surveyed Jurisdictions Also Included: Sonoma County Napa County Sacramento County Commercial Linkage Fee (per sq.ft.) Hotel Retail Office Light Industrial/ Warehouse Industrial Petaluma (Current) $2.42 $4.17 $2.42 $2.49 $2.49 Petaluma (EPS Max) $141.00 $167.00 $99.00 $62.00 $62.00 Low Fee $0.69 $0.68 $0.69 $0.26 $0.51 High Fee $9.00 $18.47 $18.47 $18.47 $18.47 Median Fee $2.21 $3.57 $2.38 $1.97 $1.97 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 15

Recommended Commercial Linkage Fee Adjust fees to be consistent with County fee levels City's County's Current Fee Current Fee Employment Category per sq. ft. 1 per sq. ft. 2 Office $2.42 $2.84 Retail/Restaurant $4.17 $4.91 Industrial/R&D $2.49 $2.93 Lodging $2.42 $2.84 Assisted Living $2.42 N/A Medical $2.42 $2.84 [1] Effective July 1, 2018. [2] Effective January 1, 2018, but currently undergoing update process. Source: City of Petaluma; County of Sonoma; EPS Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 16