Social Spending, Taxes and Income Redistribu8on in Colombia. Nora Lus4g; Tulane University, CEQ Director Marcela Meléndez

Similar documents
Social Spending, Taxes and Income Redistribu8on in Paraguay

Fiscal Policy and the Ethno- Racial Divide: Bolivia, Brazil and Uruguay

Poverty, Inequality and the Millennium Development Goals in La:n America. Nora Lus)g Professor, Tulane University Nonresident Fellow, CGD and IAD

SESSION 8 Fiscal Incidence in South Africa

Fiscal Incidence Analysis in Theory and Practice Nora Lustig Tulane University Nonresident Fellow CGD and IAD

Taxes, Social Spending, Inequality and the Middle Class in Latin America

Fiscal Policy and the Ethno- Racial Divide: Bolivia, Brazil and Uruguay

Taxation, Transfers, and Redistribution Brazil and the United States

FISCAL POLICY INCIDENCE AND POVERTY REDUCTION: EVIDENCE FROM TUNISIA

Taxes, Transfers, Inequality, and Poverty: Argen9na, Bolivia, Brazil, Mexico, and Peru

Commitment to Equity in Fiscal Policy World Bank, 2013 World Bank Conference on Equity June 10-11, Washington DC

Comparing Taxation, Transfers, and Redistribution in Brazil and the United States

Fiscal policy and redistribu2on in Namibia

Fiscal Policies, Inequality and Poverty: An Application of the Commitment to Equity (CEQ) Assessment to Argentina and Mexico

THE IMPACT OF TAXES AND SOCIAL SPENDING ON INEQUALITY AND POVERTY IN ARGENTINA, BOLIVIA, BRAZIL, MEXICO AND PERU: A SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS

Fiscal Policy Incidence on Poverty and Inequality in Latin America

Fiscal Policy and Redistribution in Latin America

Sean Higgins and Claudiney Pereira Department of Economics Tulane University. LASA 2013, Washington, DC May 31, 2013

Social Spending, Taxes and Income Redistribution in Uruguay 1 Marisa Bucheli, Nora Lustig, Maximo Rossi and Florencia Amábile 2 August 31, 2012

Inequality, Poverty, Markets and the State: the Case of Brazil Nora Lus)g Tulane University Nonresident Fellow CGD and IAD

Fiscal Policy, Urban- Rural Inequality and Rural Poverty in Brazil

The Role of Conditional Cash Transfers in the Process of Equitable Economic Development

Fiscal Incidence and Poverty Reduction: Evidence from Tunisia

FISCAL POLICY, INEQUALITY AND THE ETHNIC DIVIDE IN GUATEMALA Maynor Cabrera, Nora Lustig and Hilicías Morán COMMITMENT TO EQUITY

SOCIAL SPENDING, TAXES AND INCOME REDISTRIBUTION IN PARAGUAY. Working Paper No. 13 February 2013

THE DISTRIBUTIONAL IMPACT OF FISCAL POLICY IN INDONESIA. Jon Jellema, Matthew Wai-Poi and Rythia Afkar

SOCIAL SPENDING, TAXES AND INCOME REDISTRIBUTION IN PARAGUAY Sean Higgins, Nora Lustig, Julio Ramirez, William Swanson COMMITMENT TO EQUITY

INEQUALITY AND FISCAL REDISTRIBUTION IN MIDDLE INCOME COUNTRIES Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Indonesia, Mexico, Peru and South Africa

How to use ADePT for Social Protection Analysis

Inequality and Fiscal Redistribution in Middle Income Countries: Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Indonesia, Mexico, Peru and South Africa

FISCAL POLICY, INCOME REDISTRIBUTION AND POVERTY REDUCTION: EVIDENCE FROM TUNISIA

Abstract. Keywords: fiscal incidence, social spending, inequality, developing countries

How to use ADePT for Social Protection Analysis

Nora Lustig a, * Inequality and Fiscal Redistribution in Middle Income Countries: Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Indonesia, Mexico, Peru and South Africa

Fiscal Policy, Inequality and the Poor in the Developing World

Declining Inequality in Latin America: Labor Markets & Redistributive Policies

Social Spending, Taxes and Income Redistribution in Uruguay

Easy and Hard Redistribution: The Political Economy of Welfare States in Latin America

1 The team involved in the preparation of this paper is as follows. Coordinator: Nora Lustig, Tulane University and CGD

Fiscal Policy Incidence on Inequality and Poverty in Low- and Middle-Income Countries 1

Conditional Cash Transfers: Helping reduce poverty in the short- and long-term. Ariel Fiszbein Chief Economist Human Development Network World Bank

THE IMPACT OF TAXES AND EXPENDITURES ON POVERTY AND INCOME DISTRIBUTION IN ARGENTINA

A FISCAL INCIDENCE ANALYSIS FOR ETHIOPIA. Ruth Hill, Gabriela Inchauste, Nora Lustig, Eyasu Tsehaye, and Tassew Woldehanna

How much reduction in inequality and poverty

FISCAL EQUITY AND PERSONALIZED VAT IN LATIN AMERICA

Sustainable social and economic transition: Some evidence from Latin America

FISCAL POLICY, INCOME REDISTRIBUTION AND POVERTY REDUCTION IN LOW AND MIDDLE INCOME COUNTRIES

INEQUALITY AND FISCAL REDISTRIBUTION IN MIDDLE INCOME COUNTRIES: BRAZIL, CHILE, COLOMBIA, INDONESIA, MEXICO, PERU AND SOUTH AFRICA

WIDER Working Paper 2016/164. Fiscal policy, inequality, and the poor in the developing world. Nora Lustig*

EXPLAINING LOW REDISTRIBUTIVE IMPACT IN BOLIVIA. Working Paper No. 6 January 2013

Can a Poverty-Reducing and Progressive Tax and Transfer System Hurt the Poor?

Fiscal Incidence, Fiscal Mobility and the Poor: A New Approach

Domestic Resource Mobilization and the Poor

THE IMPACT OF TAXES AND EXPENDITURES ON POVERTY AND INCOME DISTRIBUTION IN ARGENTINA

How Much? Spending on SSN Programs

FISCAL POLICY AND ETHNO-RACIAL INEQUALITY IN BOLIVIA, BRAZIL, GUATEMALA AND URUGUAY Nora Lustig COMMITMENT TO EQUITY

Younger, Myamba, Mdadila, No. 36, January 2016 FISCAL INCIDENCE IN TANZANIA. Stephen D. Younger, Flora Myamba, and Kenneth Mdadila

SOCIAL SPENDING AND INCOME REDISTRIBUTION IN ARGENTINA DURING THE 2000S: THE RISING ROLE OF NONCONTRIBUTORY PENSIONS

Fiscal Policy, Inequality and the Poor in the Developing World

in the A Fiscal Policy Challenge for Latin America & the Caribbean Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized

Have Cash Transfers Succeeded in Reaching the Poor in Latin America and the Caribbean?

1. Setting up a Registry of Beneficiaries (RoB)

FISCAL POLICY AND ETHNO-RACIAL INEQUALITY IN BOLIVIA, BRAZIL, GUATEMALA AND URUGUAY

FISCAL POLICY, INEQUALITY AND THE POOR IN THE DEVELOPING WORLD

The Tax System and. John Scott, CIDE, CONEVAL Mexico THE MIRRLEES REVIEW: TAX REFORM FOR A MODERN ECONOMY

in the A Fiscal Policy Challenge for Latin America & the Caribbean Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized

Social safety nets in good and bad times

COMMITMENT TO EQUITY: DIAGNOSTIC QUESTIONNAIRE. Working Paper No. 2. August By Nora Lustig

Investing on Human Development: More than Conditioning Cash Transfers. Woodrow Wilson Center September 25, 2008

COMMITMENT TO EQUITY ASSESSMENT: HANDBOOK Nora Lustig and Sean Higgins COMMITMENT TO EQUITY

WIDER Working Paper 2016/164, revised version May Fiscal policy, inequality, and the poor in the developing world.

THE DISTRIBUTIONAL IMPACT OF FISCAL POLICY IN JORDAN. Shamma A. Alam, Gabriela Inchauste, and Umar Serajuddin

KEY CHALLENGES FOR ERRADICATING POVERTY AND OVERCOMING INEQUALITIES: Alicia Bárcena

econstor Make Your Publications Visible.

On the Always Vexing Question of Targeting:

Fiscal Policy, Income Redistribution, and Poverty Reduction in Low- and Middle-Income Countries 1

Fiscal Policy, Income Redistribution and Poverty Reduction in Low and Middle Income Countries

Issues for Non Contributory Benefits (Social Pensions)

Poverty and Inequality Reduction Strategy in Colombia. How is it measured? La noche de los pobres. Diego Rivera

AN APPLICATION OF THE CEQ EFFECTIVENESS INDICATORS: THE CASE OF IRAN

Motivation. Conditional cash transfer (CCT) programs have become very popular: first in Latin America and now across the world

Economic Development. Problem Set 1

Session 1 Introduc/on to CEQ

Learning from your neighbor: tax-benefit systems swaps in Latin America

Impact of Global Financial Crisis and Assessment of Policy Responses. Suzanne Duryea November 18, 2010

PENSION NOTES No APRIL Non-contributory pension programs in Latin America

ECON 256: Poverty, Growth & Inequality. Jack Rossbach

Explanatory note on the 2014 Human Development Report composite indices. Brazil. HDI values and rank changes in the 2014 Human Development Report

Explanatory note on the 2014 Human Development Report composite indices. Colombia. HDI values and rank changes in the 2014 Human Development Report

Learning Event on the Commitment to Equity Methodology Commitment to Equity Institute, Tulane University and The World Bank

What has happened to inequality and poverty in post-apartheid South Africa. Dr Max Price Vice Chancellor University of Cape Town

Labour and productive inclusion policies and programmes A regional experience

Fiscal Policy, Income Redistribution and Poverty Reduction in Low and Middle Income Countries. 1. Nora Lustig 2. June 5, 2017

Daude, Lustig, Melguizo and Perea, WP 72, 2017

Social and demographic challenges of sustainable development in Russia Daria Popova

OECD Conference, Paris, May 19th 2010 Session 3: Improving income support and redistribution

Shifting Wealth and What It Means for Development Policy

Labor Markets in Latin America and the Caribbean & IDB Agenda

The Distributional Impact of Taxes and Social Spending in Croatia

CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

Transcription:

Social Spending, Taxes and Redistribu8on in Colombia Nora Lus4g; Tulane University, CEQ Director Marcela Meléndez October 18, 13

Impact of social spending and taxes on inequality and poverty Gini coefficient for each income concept.58.56.575.574.574.563.568.569.54.528.542.541.535.52.5.48.46.44.56.54.53.517.54.53.498.59.498.494.493.51.5.498.489.465.463.448.446.438.42 Net Market Disposable Post-fiscal Final Bolivia Brazil Guatemala México Perú Colombia

Impact of social spending and taxes on inequality and poverty Headcount Index $2.5 PPP for each income concept 35 29.3 29.5 27.8 29.6 25 15 19.6 19.6 17.6 17.9 15.4 15.5 15.2 15.2 17.6 16.4 14. 19.4 18.2 14.3 14.3 12.2 12.4 11..8.2 5 Net Disposable Post-Fiscal Bolivia Brazil Guatemala México Perú Colombia

Impact of social spending and taxes on inequality and poverty Headcount Index $4 PPP for each income concept 6 5 51.5 51.7 5.9 52.7 4 32.5 32.5 31.7 32. 28.6 28.6 26.7 26.9 23.4 23.8 32.9.7 33.4.9 28.4 27.8 28.2 23. 22.5 22.3 Net Disposable Post-Fiscal Bolivia Brazil Guatemala México Perú Colombia

Incidence of taxes and social spending Incidence by decile Deciles per cápita - Max Direct Taxes and Contrib. to SS Net Market Familias en Acción y Adulto Mayor Other Direct Transfer All Direct Transfers Disposable Indirect Subsidies Indirect Taxes Net Indirect Taxes Post-Fiscal In-kind Education In-kind Health Housing and Urban All In-kind Transfers Final 1 121,815 -.3 -.3 13.8.7 14.5 14.3 2.4-2.7 -.3 14. 58. 25.9.2 84. 98. 2 198,478 -.4 -.4 6..3 6.3 5.9 1.3-1.6 -.3 5.6 25.4 11.7.1 37.2 42.8 3 275,748 -.8 -.8 2.9.1 3. 2.2.9-1.3 -.4 1.8 16.5 6.8. 23.4 25.2 4 353,183 -.9 -.9 2..1 2.2 1.3.8-1.3 -.5.7 11.4 4.6.1 16.1 16.9 5 441,7-1.1-1.1 1.2. 1.2.1.6-1.4 -.7 -.7 8.7 3.2. 11.9 11.3 6 557,129-1.3-1.3.8..8 -.5.6-1.3 -.7-1.2 6.7 2.1.1 8.9 7.7 7 741,936-1.5-1.5.4..4-1.1.5-1.3 -.8-1.9 5.2 1.2.1 6.6 4.7 8 1,26,97-1.7-1.7.1..2-1.5.3-1.1 -.8-2.3 3.5.6.1 4.3 1.9 9 1,664,172-1.8-1.8..1.1-1.7.2-1. -.8-2.5 1.9.3.3 2.5. - -1.9-1.9... -1.8. -.4 -.4-2.2.4...5-1.8 Total -1.6-1.6.6..6-1..3 -.9 -.6-1.6 4. 1.3.1 5.4 3.8

Incidence of taxes and social spending Incidence by decile, Brasil. Deciles 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Direct Taxes and Contributi ons to SS Net Market Noncontributory Pensions Flagship CCT Other Direct Transfers (Targeted or Not) All Direct Transfers Disposable Indirect Taxes Net Indirect Taxes Post-Fiscal In-kind Education In-kind Health All In-kind Transfers -.2 -.2 34.7 27.2 45.7 7.6 7.3-22.4-22.4 84.9 182.9 119.5 2.4 387.3 -.6 -.6 9.1 9.4 15.3 33.8 33.2-15.3-15.3 17.9 66.8 55.5 122.4 14.2 -.7 -.7 4.8 4.2 12. 21..3-14. -14. 6.3 39.3 36.8 76.1 82.4 -.9 -.9 3. 1.9 9.5 14.4 13.5-13.5-13.5. 26.1 28.5 54.6 54.6-1. -1. 1.7.8.1 12.6 11.6-13.5-13.5-1.9 16.8.8 37.7 35.8-1.1-1.1 1..4 7.3 8.7 7.6-13.2-13.2-5.6 12.2 15.7 28. 22.4-1.3-1.3.3.2 6. 6.4 5.1-13. -13. -7.9 8.5 12.4.8 13. -1.7-1.7.2.1 5. 5.2 3.4-12.8-12.8-9.3 6. 7.3 13.3 4. -2.6-2.6.1. 3.2 3.3.7-12.6-12.6-11.9 3.5 3.6 7.1-4.8-7. -7... 2.3 2.3-4.7-12.5-12.5-17.1 1.4.5 1.9-15.2 Total -4. -4..9.6 4.8 6.3 2.2-12.9-12.9 -.6 8.6 8.4 17. 6.4 Final

Incidence of taxes and social spending Incidence by socioeconomic group Group: per cápita - Max Population shares y < 1.25 5,833 5.8 1.25 < = y < 2.5 1,833 11.8 2.5 <= y < 4 162,99 14. 4 <= y < 47,5 37.4 <= y < 5 2,37,222 27.7 5 <= y - 3.2 Total. Direct Taxes and Contrib. to SS Net Market Familias en Acción y Adulto Mayor Other Direct Transfer All Direct Transfers Disposable Indirect Subsidies Indirect Taxes Net Indirect Taxes Post- Fiscal In-kind Education In-kind Health Housing and Urban All Inkind Transfers -.3 -.3 19.2 1.5.7.5 23.6-16.6 7. 27.4 136.4 57.6.4 194.3 221.8 -.5 -.5 8.1.2 8.3 7.9 11. -12.7-1.6 6.2 53.6 23.8.2 77.6 83.8 -.8 -.8 4..1 4.1 3.3 7.3-12.4-5.1-1.8 29.7 12.2.1 42. 4.2-1.4-1.4 1.. 1.1 -.3 4.1-9.4-5.3-5.6 13.1 4.3.2 17.6 12. -2. -2..1.1.1-1.9 1.1-5.4-4.3-6.1 3.2.5.3 4. -2.1-2.1-2.1... -2..1-1.4-1.3-3.3.2...2-3.2-1.8-1.8.6.1.7-1.1 1.9-5.6-3.6-4.7 7. 2.3.2 9.4 4.7 Final

Incidence of taxes and social spending Fiscal mobility matrices groups Disposable groups y < 1.25 1.25 <= y < 2.5 2.5 <= y < 4 4 <= y < <= y < 5 5 <= y Percent of Population y < 1.25 81.% 18.% 1.%.%.%.% 5.8% 1.25 <= y < 2.5.% 88.% 11.5%.4%.%.% 11.8% 2.5 <= y < 4.% 1.5% 92.1% 6.4%.%.% 14.% 4 <= y <.%.%.7% 99.1%.2%.% 37.4% <= y < 5.%.%.% 2.2% 97.8%.% 27.7% 5 <= y.%.%.%.% 4.4% 95.6% 3.2% Percent of Population 4.7% 11.7% 14.6% 38.7% 27.3% 3.1%.% groups Post-Fiscal groups y < 1.25 1.25 <= y < 2.5 2.5 <= y < 4 4 <= y < <= y < 5 5 <= y Percent of Population y < 1.25 69.3%.3%.3%.1%.%.% 5.8% 1.25 <= y < 2.5 9.% 71.6% 19.%.5%.%.% 11.8% 2.5 <= y < 4 2.8% 13.2% 71.1% 12.8%.%.% 14.% 4 <= y <.2% 1.4% 7.7% 89.4% 1.2%.% 37.4% <= y < 5.1%.2%.% 9.5% 9.3%.% 27.7% 5 <= y.%.%.%.% 7.8% 92.2% 3.2% Percent of Population 5.6% 12.7% 15.1% 38.% 25.7% 3.%.%

Progressivity of taxes and social spending Concentra4on shares of direct and indirect taxes 6 5 53. 46.4 6 5 46.4 4 4 15.517..4 11..9 1.9 2.8 3.8 4.8 5.9 7.77. 4.7.1.5 1.3 2. 3.3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Decile 24.3 17.7 13.8 15.5 11.4.4.9 1.9 2.8 3.8 4.8 5.9 7.7 2.8 3.6 4.3 5.8 7.6 8.8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Decile Direct Taxes Indirect Taxes 8 7 6 5 4 5.5 45.9 31.4 27.3.6 15.8.4 1.9 3.9.1.5 1.8 y < 1.25 1.25 < = y < 2.5 2.5 <= y < 4 4 <= y < <= y < 5 5 <= y Socioeconomic Group 8 7 6 5 4 45.9 44.3 34.7 27.3.6 8.7.4 1.9 4.4 6.7 3.9 1.2 y < 1.25 1.25 < = y < 2.5 2.5 <= y < 4 4 <= y < <= y < 5 5 <= y Socioeconomic Group Direct Taxes Indirect Taxes

Progressivity of taxes and social spending Concentra4on shares of direct and indirect transfers 6 6 5 46.4 5 46.4 4 4 22..9 14.7 13.8 15.5. 8.5.4.9 1.9 2.8 3.8 4.8 5.9 7.7 5.6 2.6 1.2.7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Decile 15.5.4 7.4 8.3 8.9 9.9.5 11.3 12.2 12.2 11.5.9 1.9 2.8 3.8 4.8 5.9 7.7 7.9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Decile Familias en Acción y Adulto Mayor Indirect Subsidies 8 7 6 5 4 45.9 33.1 25.3 24.8 27.3.6 12.1.4 1.9 3.9 4.3.3 y < 1.25 1.25 < = y < 2.5 2.5 <= y < 4 4 <= y < <= y < 5 5 <= y Socioeconomic Group 8 7 6 5 4 45.9 43.4 27.3 25.3.6 14.6 11. 4.8.4 1.9 3.9.8 y < 1.25 1.25 < = y < 2.5 2.5 <= y < 4 4 <= y < <= y < 5 5 <= y Socioeconomic Group Familias en Acción y Adulto Mayor Indirect Subsidies

Progressivity of taxes and social spending In- kind spending distribu4on: Educa4on and health 6 6 5 46.4 5 46.4 4 4 15.5 13. 12.3 11.8.9.4..2.4.9 1.9 2.8 3.8 4.8 5.9 7.7 9.3 7.5 4.6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Decile 17.4 17. 14.6 15.5 13.3 11.6 9.6.4.9 1.9 2.8 3.8 4.8 5.9 7.77.2 4.9 3.2 1.2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Decile Education Health 8 7 6 5 4 45.9 38.7 27.3.6 21.2 15. 16.7 7.7.4 1.9 3.9.7 y < 1.25 1.25 < = y < 2.5 2.5 <= y < 4 4 <= y < <= y < 5 5 <= y Socioeconomic Group 8 7 6 5 4 45.9 38.9 27.3.4 21.1.6. 9.5.4 1.9 3.9.2 y < 1.25 1.25 < = y < 2.5 2.5 <= y < 4 4 <= y < <= y < 5 5 <= y Socioeconomic Group Education Health

Progressivity of taxes and social spending In- kind spending distribu4on: Housing 6 5 4 5.1 46.4 15.5 12.2 14..4.5.9 1.9 2.8 3.8 4.8 5.9 7.7 4.4 1.7 1.7 1.2 2.7 1.6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Decile Housing 8 7 6 5 4 73.7 45.9 27.3.6.9.4 1.9 3.9.7 2.3 2.1.2 y < 1.25 1.25 < = y < 2.5 2.5 <= y < 4 4 <= y < <= y < 5 5 <= y Socioeconomic Group Housing

Progressivity of taxes and social spending Concentra4on coeficients and GINI indices Familias en Acción y Adulto Mayor Health Primary Education Spending Pre-school Education Spending Secondary Education Spending Education Indirect Subsidies Other Conditional Cash Transfer Tertiary Education Spending Indirect Taxes Housing Final income* Gini Final income Gini Disponsable income Gini Post-fiscal income Gini Net market income Gini Market income Gini -.422 -.314 -.8 -.269 -.166 -.126.51.113.285.361.527.534.535.568.569.574.575 -.6 -.4 -....4.6.8 Concentration Coefficient (or Gini when specified)

Enhancing the redistribu8ve capacity: where to Look Per capita transfers for poor and nonpoor Social Spending SHARE OF BENEFITS GOING TO EACH INCOME GROUP y < 1.25 y < 2.5 y < 4 4 < y < < y < 5 y > 5 Total Conditional Cash Transfers 12.1 36. 59.7 32. 7.9.3 Familias en Acción y Adulto Mayor 12.1 37.4 62.2 33.1 4.3.3 Other Conditional Cash Transfer 11.4 19.1 29.5 19. 51.4.1 Indirect Subsidies 4.8 15.8.4 43.4 25.3.8 Total In-kind Transfers 8.2 24.2 41.8 38.4 19.2.6 Total Housing.7 3. 5.1.9 73.7.2 Total Education 7.7 22.7 39.4 38.7 21.2.7 Pre-school Education.6. 5. 37. 12.5.4 Primary Education 11. 32.1 53.2 35.3 11.2.3 Secondary Education 7.2 22.4 39.6 42.8 17.2.4 Tertiary Education 1.8 4.7 12.4 38.7 46.9 1.9 Education: all except tertiary 9.4 27.7 47. 38.7 13.9.4 Total Health..4 51.5 38.9 9.5.2 Total Contributory Pensions..1.9 9.9 56.9 32.3 shares.4 2.3 6.2.6 45.9 27.3 Population shares 5.8 17.6 31.7 37.4 27.7 3.2

Enhancing the redistribu8ve capacity: where to Look Coverage of social spending, Colombia Social Spending SHARE OF INDIVIDUALS IN BENEFICIARY HOUSEHOLDS y < 1.25 y < 2.5 y < 4 4 < y < < y < 5 y > 5 Total Conditional Cash Transfers 57.7 56.9 52.4 25.5 4.6 1. Familias en Acción y Adulto Mayor 56.6 55.5 51.2 24.5 4.1 1. Other Conditional Cash Transfer 1.1 1.4 1.2.9.5.1 Indirect Subsidies 79.3 83. 85.3 92.9 86.7 37.3 Total In-kind Transfers 96.5 97.1 96.8 88.8 58.2 12.5 Total Housing 1.3 1.1 1..6.5. Total Education 82. 81.9 8.9 69.1 43.9 11.1 Pre-school Education 32.7 31.8 28.3 16.5 7.1 2. Primary Education 61.4 6.9 57.7 35.5 14.5 2.5 Secondary Education 46.6 45.9 44.4 39.3.9 4. Tertiary Education 2.2 2.7 4.3 11.5 15.1 4.8 Education: all except tertiary 79.8 79.2 76.6 57.6 28.8 6.3 Total Health 9.8 9.9 87.2 64.4 27.1 3.6 Total Contributory Pensions.3.8 1.7 8.1 21.1.2 shares.4 2.3 6.2.6 45.9 27.3 Population shares 5.8 17.6 31.7 37.4 27.7 3.2

Enhancing the redistribu8ve capacity: where to Look Coverage of social spending, Brasil Social Spending SHARE OF INDIVIDUALS IN BENEFICIARY HOUSEHOLDS y < 1.25 y < 2.5 y < 4 4 < y < < y < 5 y > 5 Bolsa_Familia 93.8 89.2 8.7 29.2 4.7.3 Special Pensions - Non contributory 44.1 32.9 22.6 7.7 1..6 Pre-school aged children 72.6 7.7 68.2 57.3 42.1 6.9 Primary 97.3 97.8 97.2 91.6 67.9 11.4 Secondary 79.6 8.8 8.2 75.6 57.7 14.4 Non-Tertiary 95. 94.8 93.6 85.9 64. 13.2 Tertiary 3.8 2.5 2.3 4..5. Contributory 29.7 51.8 67.2 91.4 93.9 94.2 shares.3 1.6 4.2 15.8 49.7.4 Population shares 5.8 15.4 26.7 33.5 35.3 4.5