UN BHUTAN COUNTRY FUND

Similar documents
Fifth Consolidated Annual Progress Report on Activities Implemented under the United Nations Bhutan Country Fund

Ethiopia One UN Fund Terms of Reference

United Nations Fund for Recovery Reconstruction and Development in Darfur (UNDF)

Accelerating Progress toward the Economic Empowerment of Rural Women (RWEE) Multi-Partner Trust Fund Terms of Reference UN WOMEN, FAO, IFAD, WFP

South Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund (South Sudan CHF) Terms of Reference (TOR)

FINAL 26 February PARTNERSHIP FOR PROGRESS: UN Civil Society Fund

ANNEX A. Indonesia UNPDF Trust Fund. Terms of Reference

Economic and Social Council

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund (CHF) Revised Terms of Reference July 2008

Iraq United Nations Development Assistance Framework Fund. Terms of Reference

Annex 1: The One UN Programme in Ethiopia

Ethiopia s Climate Resilient Green Economy (CRGE) Facility Terms of Reference

partnership charter I. Background II. Mission

Second Consolidated Annual Progress Report on Projects Implemented under the Maldives One UN Fund

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT FOR MANAGEMENT AND OTHER SUPPORT SERVICES RELATED TO THE ETHIOPIA CLIMATE RESILIENT GREEN ECONOMY FACILITY

Arrangements for the revision of the terms of reference for the Peacebuilding Fund

Internal Audit of the Republic of Albania Country Office January Office of Internal Audit and Investigations (OIAI) Report 2017/24

NOW, THEREFORE, the UNDP and the Recipient Organizations (hereinafter referred to collectively as the Participants ) hereby agree as follows:

Sixth Consolidated Annual Progress Report on Activities Implemented under the United Nations Bhutan Country Fund

INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTORY COMMENTS

Sustainable Development Goals Fund (SDG Fund) Framework and Guidance for Partnerships with the Private Sector

The Global Acceleration Instrument (GAI) for Women Peace and Security and Humanitarian Action. Operations Manual

STANDARD MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) FOR MULTI-DONOR TRUST FUNDS USING PASS-THROUGH FUND MANAGEMENT

CC is a development issue - not just an environmental concern CC impacts on human development, economic growth, poverty alleviation and the

MANUAL OF PROCEDURES FOR DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS TO PARTICIPATING PARTNERS

Decision 3/CP.17. Launching the Green Climate Fund

AFGHANISTAN ALLOCATION GUIDELINES 22 JANUARY 2014

We recommend the establishment of One UN at country level, with one leader, one programme, one budgetary framework and, where appropriate, one office.

The Global Acceleration Instrument (GAI) for Women Peace and Security and Humanitarian Action. Operations Manual

UNDG Fiduciary Management Oversight Group (FMOG) Terms of Reference

STANDARD MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) FOR MULTI-DONOR TRUST FUNDS USING PASS-THROUGH FUND MANAGEMENT

Proposed Working Mechanisms for Joint UN Teams on AIDS at Country Level

BACKGROUND PAPER ON COUNTRY STRATEGIC PLANS

UNDP Executive Board Funding Dialogue. January 2015

STANDARD MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) FOR UN CIVIL SOCIETY TRUST FUND

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT FOR MANAGEMENT AND OTHER SUPPORT SERVICES RELATED TO THE SOMALIA UN MPTF S NATIONAL STREAM

INDIVIDUAL CONSULTANT PROCUREMENT NOTICE TOR - CONSULTANCY IC/2012/026. Date: 16 April 2012

Additional Modalities that Further Enhance Direct Access: Terms of Reference for a Pilot Phase

III. modus operandi of Tier 2

Bhutan s Journey in Localizing the SDGs

Annex 1. Action Fiche for Solomon Islands

Annex 2: SSHF Memorandum of Understanding [Template] STANDARD MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) FOR SOUTH SUDAN HUMANITARIAN FUND

OFFICIAL -1 L(-L DOCUMENTS. Between. and

LCRP Steering Committee Meeting 3 JULY 2018

ANNEX I: QCPR MONITORING AND REPORTING FRAMEWORK

25 November 2015 Terms of Reference. UN-REDD Programme Multi-Partner Trust Fund

Terms of Reference (ToR)

First Consolidated Annual Progress Report on Activities Implemented under the Lesotho One UN Fund

Arrangements for establishing the Peacebuilding Fund

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

Building a Nation: Sint Maarten National Development Plan and Institutional Strengthening. (1st January 31st March 2013) First-Quarter Report

The Ethiopian Diaspora Trust Fund (EDTF) Terms of Reference

Joint Partnership Arrangement

A Roadmap for SDG Implementation in Mauritius Indicative. UNDP Mission Team 17 November 2016

United Nations RWANDA. Unity in Diversity

COMMON BUDGETARY FRAMEWORK

Second Consolidated Annual Progress Report on Activities Implemented under the Sierra Leone Multi Donor Trust Fund

DECISION ADOPTED BY THE CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY AT ITS ELEVENTH MEETING

Regulation on the implementation of the European Economic Area (EEA) Financial Mechanism

The Global Acceleration Instrument for Women, Peace & Security and Humanitarian Action

GPE OPERATIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR EFFECTIVE SUPPORT IN FRAGILE AND CONFLICT- AFFECTED STATES

OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS. The World Bank. Public Disclosure Authorized. Public Disclosure Authorized

Supplementary matrix 1

Fund for Gender Equality Monitoring and Evaluation Framework Executive Summary

Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka. Smallholder Agribusiness Partnerships (SAP) Programme. Negotiated financing agreement

2014 Annual Progress Report of the Sustainable Development Goals Fund (SDG-F)

STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT OF THE LDCF PIPELINE

South Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund Allocation Process Guidelines

Bangladesh 25 October 2015

GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK FOR

Proposed Luxembourg-WHO collaboration: Supporting policy dialogue on national health policies, strategies and plans in West Africa

UNDP Pakistan Monitoring Policy STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT UNIT UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME, PAKISTAN

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 291 thereof,

UNFPA EXECUTIVE BOARD DECISION-TRACKING MECHANISM

South Sudan Humanitarian Fund Operational Manual

Implementing the SDGs: A Global Perspective. Nik Sekhran Director, Sustainable Development Bureau for Policy and Programme Support, October 2016

DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION PROGRAMME FOR THE GAMBIA. Presentation

UN-REDD Viet Nam Phase II Multi-Partner Trust Fund: Terms of Reference

IMPLEMENTING THE PARIS DECLARATION AT THE COUNTRY LEVEL

Council conclusions on the EU role in Global Health. 3011th FOREIGN AFFAIRS Council meeting Brussels, 10 May 2010

Economic and Social Council

with Caribbean Community Climate Change Centre (5Cs) for Belize 14 December 2016 NDA Strengthening & Country Programming

National Plan Commission April 2018 Addis Ababa

PART I PRELIMINARY. 1. These Regulations may be cited as the Public Finance Management (Climate Change Fund) Regulations, 2018.

Click to edit Master title style. Financing Adaptation

9644/10 YML/ln 1 DG E II

Operational Effectiveness of the UN MDTF Mechanism

The United Republic of Tanzania Ministry of Finance. Memorandum of Understanding. Between. The Government of the United Republic of Tanzania

GUIDELINES FOR STRATEGIES IN SWEDISH DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION AND HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE

FUNDING STRATEGY FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GLOBAL PLAN OF ACTION FOR ANIMAL GENETIC RESOURCES

Operational Manual GUYANA REDD-Plus INVESTMENT FUND (GRIF)

Friday, 4 June Distinguished Co-Chairs, Distinguished Delegates, Ladies and Gentlemen,

HOW ETHIOPIA IS DOING TO MEET SDGS

Administration Agreement

CE TEXTE N'EST DISPONIBLE QU'EN VERSION ANGLAISE

Climate Change Finance Mainstreaming: A Snapshot

Operational Policies and Guidelines of the Adaptation Fund. November Panama City, Panama

Annex. 11 th EDF Support to the Office of the NAO CRIS No. TZ/FED/ Total estimated cost: EUR

INSTRUMENT FOR PRE-ACCESSION ASSISTANCE (IPA II) ALBANIA European Union Integration Facility. Action summary

47. This section presents the core budget for the biennium as proposed by the Executive Secretary:

Transcription:

UN BHUTAN COUNTRY FUND Terms of Reference Introduction: 1. The UN system in Bhutan is implementing the One Programme 2014-2018. The One Programme is the result of a highly consultative and participatory process involving the Royal Government of Bhutan, key national implementing partners, resident and non-resident UN agencies and other international partners. The One Programme reflects the activities of 19 UN agencies supporting Bhutan within four outcome areas: Sustainable Development; Essential Social Services; Gender Equality and Child Protection; and Good Governance and Participation. 2. As a result of this participatory approach, the One Programme is fully aligned with the 16 National Key Result Areas of the 11 th Five Year Plan (2013-2018), and structured around the four pillars of Gross National Happiness (GNH) 1. The One Programme will act as a critical bridge between the final years of the MDGs and the post-2015 agenda. 3. The Government is fully involved at all levels of One Programme implementation. As reflected in the Outcome Group architecture (Figure 1), the joint Government-UN Country Programme Board 2 is responsible for the overall implementation and supervision. The Board provides supervision and guidance to the Outcome Groups who are responsible for the formulation, monitoring and evaluation of the implementation of the One Programme through the 18-month workplans 3 with implementing partners. Purpose of the UN Bhutan Country Fund: 4. The objective of the UN Bhutan Country Fund (One Fund), under the management leadership of the Joint Government-UN Steering Committee, is to support coherent resource mobilization, allocation and disbursement of resources to support the un(der)funded portions of the One Programme and new initiatives responding to emerging needs. This will enhance the flexibility and responsiveness of the UN system through the One Programme to address existing and emerging national priorities. The Fund will support allocation and disbursement of donor resources and coherent resource mobilization. 5. The Un Bhutan Country Fund is one of the proposed vehicles for new resources pooled by donors to support the unfunded gap of the One Programme. The Fund, under the guidance of the Outcome Groups and the joint M&E Group, and leadership of the Resident Coordinator and UNCT, is intended to facilitate 1 Annex 1: Alignment between the national priorities and UN Bhutan areas of support-2014-2018. 2 The Board comprises of Secretaries of all relevant ministries, representatives of UN agencies signatory to the One Programme. The Board is co-chaired by the Secretary, GNH Commission and the UN Resident Coordinator. 3 The 18-month workplan with indicative resource is implemented to align to the Government s fiscal year of July June thus improving programme planning. 1

the realization of One Programme outcomes by strengthening the planning and coordination process, and channeling consistent and predictable funds towards the highest priority needs. Figure 1: Outcome Group Architecture Subscription and Utilization of the UN Bhutan Country Fund: Division of Responsibilities for One Programme Implementation: CPB: Overall supervision and guidance. Outcome Groups: Policy dialogue, planning of joint work plans and monitoring of implementation of four priority areas. Implementing Partners (IPs): Implementation of joint AWPs. 6. The UN Bhutan Country Fund is open to all UN agencies signatory to the One Programme. They can access the funds upon signing the Memorandum of Understanding as Participating UN Organizations, and upon submission of their annual funding gaps based on the One Programme Results Matrix. 7. Participating UN Organizations regular funds remain outside the UN Bhutan Country Fund and therefore, they will continue to manage and handle their own core funding. Participating UN Organizations will continue to raise other resources on an agency basis, and will be required to periodically inform the RC/UNCT on the amount mobilized and the planned allocation of those resources to ensure that the UN system has an up-to-date overview of the available and required resources to provide an accurate picture of the resource gaps for submission to the UN Bhutan Country Fund. 8. Joint resource mobilization increases the probability of realizing the One Programme results by ensuring adequate resources are raised in a structured manner. It will reduce transaction costs through integrated reporting by the UN system to donors on expenditures. 9. The Participating UN Organizations have appointed UNDP to serve as the Administrative Agent, and this has been endorsed by the Royal Government of Bhutan. UNDP, through its Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office (MPTF Office), will administer the Fund in accordance with the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding for the UN Country Fund and the ToR. 10. The Administrative Agent (AA) and the Participating UN Organizations will be entitled to deduct their indirect costs on contributions received as stated in the Memorandum of Understanding. The Administrative Agent s administrative fee will be 1%. The fee will be deducted from the contribution to the 2

One Fund at the time they are deposited. The indirect costs of the Participating UN Organizations will be 7%. Contributions to the UN Bhutan Country Fund: 11. Contributions to the UN Bhutan Country Fund may be accepted from governments of Member States to the United Nations, from intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations, from private sources, and other resident and non-resident donors. Acceptance of funds from the private sector will be guided by criteria stipulated in the UN system-wide guidelines on Cooperation between the United Nations and the Business Community available at: http://www.un.org/partners/business/otherpages/guide.htm 12. To achieve optimal progress and ensure maximum flexibility and adaptation to national priorities, a guiding principle for resource mobilization would be that donors are encouraged to contribute with multi-year unearmarked resources. It is possible also for the contributors to earmark contributions by outcome, output and/or UN agency. 13. The UN Bhutan Country Fund responds to both the Delivering as One approach and commitment to Aid Effectiveness as per the Paris Declaration. 14. Contributions to the UN Bhutan Country Fund may be accepted in fully convertible currency. Such contributions shall be deposited in the bank accounts designated by UNDP. The value of a contributionpayment, if made in other currencies than United States dollars, shall be determined by applying the UN operational rate of exchange in effect on the date of payment. Governance Arrangements: 15. The One Programme document, as well as joint programmes and agency programme documents falling thereunder is the programmatic planning document that will serve as the basis for funding requests and allocations. 16. For un-earmarked contributions, fund allocation will follow a two-tier process as reflected in the Fund Allocation Process in Annex B. The joint Outcome Groups (refer to Figure 1) will submit their priorities for funding based on the updated funding gap matrix, finalized at their Annual Review meetings in November each year. These proposed priorities will be compiled and reviewed by the Office of the Resident Coordinator and the GNH Commission and submitted to the Steering Committee. 17. The Steering Committee will review the proposed priorities and approve the initial prioritization if required, and based on it, the Steering Committee will submit an overview of the Resource Gap matrix to the development partners in December each year. 18. Upon receipt of funds from donors, the Steering Committee will make the allocation decisions, based on the financial status of the Fund and the needs of the Government. The Steering Committee will inform the Country Programme Board of the final endorsement at the Board s annual meeting. For decision making, at least half of the Steering Committee members should be present or provide delegated authority. Decisions will be based on a consultative process and will be documented jointly by the Office of the Resident Coordinator and the GNH Commission. (Refer: Annex C Fund Allocation Process). 3

Fund Allocation Criteria 19. The allocation criteria for the UN Bhutan Country Fund (Refer Annex C) provide an objective basis for resource allocation decisions by the Steering Committee to allocate un-earmarked resources to the respective outcomes/outputs of the One Programme. The criteria for initial allocation are mainly related to One Programme relevance, Delivering as One, resource gaps and agency comparative advantage. Additional criteria for subsequent allocation are related to absorption capacity. The Outcome Groups are responsible for ensuring that their proposed activities meet the fund allocation criteria. The requests should preferably not be below US$ 100,000 in order to encourage programmatic approaches and ensure operational efficiency. The Resident Coordinator 20. The overall management of the UN Bhutan Country Fund will be led and coordinated by the Resident Coordinator in consensus with the Heads of the Participating UN Organizations. 21. In line with the overall objective of Delivering as One in Bhutan, the Resident Coordinator will be responsible for: Strategic leadership of the UN Bhutan Country Fund on the basis of the One Programme; Advocating and mobilizing resources for the UN Bhutan Country Fund in collaboration with participating UN Organizations; Leading a consultative process on allocations of un-earmarked contributions from the UN Bhutan Country Fund, and making final decision if consensus cannot be reached, with documented process and rationale for these decisions; Signing the Memorandum of Understanding with participating UN Organizations and the Standard Administrative Agreement(s) as witness; and Implementation of the programme activities funded by the resources from the UN Bhutan Country Fund will be the responsibility of the participating UN Organizations, as stipulated in the Memorandum of Understanding. The RC will hold the Heads of participating UN Organizations accountable for their Organization s components of the results of initiatives funded through the UN Bhutan Country Fund. The Steering Committee 22. The Steering Committee is comprised of UN signatories to the UN Bhutan Country Fund and the Gross National Happiness (GNH) Commission, and is co-chaired by the Secretary of the GNH Commission and the UN Resident Coordinator. The ToR for the Steering Committee is attached as Annex D. 23. The Steering Committee will be responsible for prioritization and allocation decisions of the un-earmarked contributions to the UN Bhutan Country Fund. The initial prioritization for allocation will be guided by recommendations from the Joint Outcome Groups annual review process. 4

24. The Steering Committee will guide the operations and management of the Fund; it will annually review the joint resource mobilization strategy and subsequently implement it. The Steering Committee will ensure that the Country Programme Board is informed of the allocations, and will take into consideration the Country Programme Board s strategic priorities. The Administrative Agent 25. As stated in the Memorandum of Understanding, Section I, the UNDP MPTF Office will, as the Administrative Agent: a. Receive contributions from donors that wish to provide financial support to the Fund; b. Administer such funds received, in accordance with this Memorandum of Understanding including the provisions relating to winding up the Fund Account and related matters; c. Subject to availability of funds, disburse such funds to each of the Participating UN Organizations in accordance with instructions from the Steering Committee, taking into account the budget set out in the approved programmatic document 4, as amended in writing from time to time by the Steering Committee; d. Consolidate statements and reports, based on submissions provided to the Administrative Agent by each Participating UN Organization, as set forth in the TOR, and provide these to each donor that has contributed to the Fund Account and to the Steering Committee; e. Provide final reporting, including notification that the Fund has been operationally completed, in accordance with Section IV below; f. Disburse funds to any Participating UN Organization for any additional costs of the task that the Steering Committee may decide to allocate (as referred to in Section I, Paragraph 3) in accordance with TOR. 29. In line with the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding, the Administrative Agent will ensure that the finalized annual consolidated report on the UN Bhutan Country Fund, is compiled and distributed to all donors contributing to the Fund and to the Participating UN Organizations, including maintaining an appropriate level of fund information on the UN system website for Bhutan (www.unct.org.bt) and the UNDP MPTF Office s website (http://mptf.undp.org/) to ensure transparency and visibility of donor contributions. Support services provided by the Resident Coordinator s Office 30. The Office of the Resident Coordinator is responsible for support to the strategic leadership role of the Resident Coordinator for the UN Bhutan Country Fund, in line with the One Programme. It will provide support in all the designated tasks for the Resident Coordinator as listed in paragraph 20 and 21. 4 As used in this document, an approved programmatic document refers to the One Programme Joint Work Plans which is approved by the Steering Committee for fund allocation purposes. 5

31. Drawing on the Joint Outcome Groups annual report, including results reports, the financial report and the funding gap matrices, the Office of the Resident Coordinator and the GNH Commission will compile and review the proposed priorities for funding allocation and submit to the Steering Committee for prioritization and allocation decisions. Monitoring and Evaluation 32. Monitoring and evaluation shall be undertaken in accordance with the Monitoring and Evaluation Framework developed to monitor and evaluate the One Programme implementation. The M&E group will provide technical advice and support on all aspects of results-based-management (RBM) to the UNCT and to the Outcome Groups to monitor the Bhutan One Programme development results and DaO results. The UNCT opted to use the national monitoring and reporting system which is in accordance with the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness. Other Matters 33. The UN Bhutan Country Fund will be established upon signing of the Memorandum of Understanding by at least two (2) Participating UN Organizations and the Administrative Agent. In principle, all Participating UN Organizations signatory to the One Programme can apply for the available funds upon signing the Memorandum of Understanding and upon submission of their annual funding gaps based on the One Programme Results Matrix. The UN Bhutan Country Fund will terminate upon completion of all projects/programmes funded through the Fund and after satisfaction of all commitments and liabilities, as stipulated in Section VIII of the Memorandum of Understanding. 34. Any balance remaining in the Fund Account or in the individual Participating UN Organizations separate ledger accounts upon completion of the Fund will be used for a purpose mutually agreed upon or returned to the donor(s) in proportion to their contribution to the Fund as agreed upon by the donors and the Steering Committee. 6

ANNEX A: ALIGNMENT BETWEEN NATIONAL PRIORITIES AND UN BHUTAN AREAS OF SUPPORT 2014-2018 Gross National Happiness NKRAs 11 th FYP One Programme Outcome Sustainable and Equitable Development Promotion and preservation of Culture Conservation and Sustainable Environmental Management Good Governance Sustained Economic Growth Poverty Reduced MDG + Achieved Food Secure and Sustainable Full Employment Needs of Vulnerable Group Addressed Historical, Cultural Property and Bhutanese Identity Promoted And Preserved. Indigenous Wisdom, Arts and Crafts Promoted For Sustainable Rural Livelihood Carbon Neutral/ Green and Climate Resilient Development Sustainable Management and Utilization Of Natural Resources Integrated Water Utilization and Management Imp. Disaster Resilience and Management Mainstreamed Improved Public Service Delivery, Motivated Public Servants GPMS Democracy and Governance Strengthened Gender Friendly Environment For Women s Participation Corruption Reduced Safe Society By 2018, increased and equitable access, utilization and quality of inclusive essential social services for all with a focus on sustaining the MDGs and addressing emerging challenges Cross-Cutting By 2018, sustainable and green economic growth that is equitable, inclusive, climate and disaster resilient and promotes poverty reduction, and employment opportunities particularly for vulnerable groups enhanced. By 2018, Governance institutions and communities exercise the principles of democratic governance at the national & local levels with a focus on inclusiveness, transparency, accountability and evidencebased decision making. By 2018, communities and institutions strengthened at all levels to achieve enhanced gender equality, empowerment and protection of women and children 7

ANNEX B: Allocation Process for Un-earmarked Funds Step 1: Submission Based on the joint Annual Reviews, the Outcome Groups submit updated resource gap matrix and indicate priorities for funding. Timeframe: November each year Step 2: Compilation & initial review: GNH Commission and Office of the RC compile and review the proposed priorities and submit the documents to the Steering Committee. Timeframe: First-half of December Step 5: Disbursement: Administrative Agent disburses the funds to the Participating UN agencies in accordance with the approved Work Plans within three (3) to five (5) working days after final allocation of funds. Timeframe: End March Step 3: Submission of resource gap The Steering Committee, comprising signatories to the UN Bhutan Country Fund MoU and the GNHC, reviews the resource gaps and approves the initial prioritization for funding. The approved resource gap is submitted to donors in December each year, with a copy to the Government. Step 4: Final Allocation Based on funds received from donors, the Steering Committee makes the final allocation decisions and informs the Country Programme Board. Timeframe: February or as and when needed Timeframe: Third week of December 8

ANNEX C: UN BHUTAN COUNTRY FUND ALLOCATION CRITERIA The UN Bhutan Country Fund is open to all Participating UN Organizations signatory to the One Programme. Organizations can access the funds upon signing the Memorandum of Understanding and upon submission of their annual funding gaps based on the One Programme Results Matrix. Criteria for initial allocation of un-earmarked funding: 1. One Programme relevance 2. Unfunded gap at outcome level 3. Joint AWP i.e. two or more participating UN Organizations implementing 4. Comparative advantage in implementing the activities 5. Priorities which would otherwise not be funded 6. Activities which support core UN development priorities and priorities identified by the Steering Committee and Country Programme Board at the start of the annual programme cycle 7. Realistic outcome budget Subsequent allocations will in addition to the above include the following: 8. Implementing partners and Participating UN Organizations absorption capacity Previous track record: 1. Results 2. Expenditure rate and financial management 3. Reporting timeliness and quality of reporting 9

ANNEX D: STEERING COMMITTEE OF THE UN BHUTAN COUNTRY FUND Terms of Reference Composition: The Steering Committee (SC) is co-chaired by the Secretary of the Gross National Happiness Commission (GNHC) and the UN Resident Coordinator (RC). Members include signatories to the UN Bhutan Country Fund MoU who have contributed to the resource gap analysis, and the Gross National Happiness (GNH) Commission. The Administrative Agent can be an ex-officio member of the Steering Committee. Other UN signatories to the One Programme may participate as observers. Key Tasks and Responsibilities: To review and approve their Terms of Reference and Rules of Procedures, based on the generic SC TOR, and update and/or modify them, as necessary, in case of compelling requirements. In case of departures from the generic TOR, the TOR of the SC should be referred for endorsement to the HQs Fiduciary Management Oversight Group; For funds earmarked by donors to thematic clusters/sectoral groups or Agencies and prioritized/allocated within thematic clusters, to review and ensure the alignment of the allocations with the strategic development framework of the country and approved national priorities; For un-earmarked funds, (1) to review and approve the criteria for the allocation of available MPTF resources; (2) to allocate available resources to thematic clusters, making sure that the allocations are aligned with the strategic development framework of the country and approved national priorities. The clusters will be responsible for the prioritization within the cluster allocation; To review and approve proposals from Agencies submitted (by thematic clusters/sectoral groups or otherwise) for funding; ensure their conformity with the requirements of the MPTF agreements (MoUs). To ensure the quality of proposals to receive funding from the MPTF. To discuss the MPTF requirements and priorities concerning, inter alia: - Programme/project management, including consistent and common approaches to programme/project costing, cost recovery, implementation modalities, results-based reporting and impact assessment, - Information management including appropriate MPTF and MPTF donor visibility; To define Terms of Reference and composition for the thematic clusters/sectoral groups or other similar review bodies. To ensure appropriate consultative processes take place with key stakeholders at the country level so as to avoid duplication or overlap between the MPTF and other funding mechanisms; To review and approve the periodic progress reports (programmatic and financial) consolidated by the Administrative Agent based on the progress reports submitted by the Participating Agencies 5. To ensure consistency in reporting between clusters; Consolidated annual reports should include a section on the activity of the Steering Committee. 5 The standard reporting period is as per the MoU. 10

To review findings of the summary audit reports consolidated by the internal audit service of the Administrative Agent. To highlight lessons learnt and periodically discuss follow up by Participating Agencies on recommended actions that have MPTF-wide impact; To agree on the scope and frequency of the independent lessons-learned and review of the MPTF commissioned by the SC, in consultation with the HQ Fiduciary Management Oversight Group. To review the draft/final reports on lessons learnt, ensure the implementation of recommendations and identify critical issues for consideration by the HQs Fiduciary Management Oversight Group (to be brought up to the ASG Group, if/as required). Decisions: The Steering Committee makes decisions by consensus. Decisions of the Steering Committee shall be duly recorded. Prior to presenting their position on a significant issue to the SC, its UN members have to make sure that it is endorsed internally by their Agencies and is in line with their Agencies regulatory requirements. Decisions on programme/project proposals will only be taken upon completion of a review by the appropriate thematic clusters, sectoral working groups or other SC agreed review bodies. Role of the UN co-chair/chair of the Steering Committee: To make sure that the decisions taken by the Steering Committee are in accordance with the regulatory requirements and frameworks of the Participating Agencies and agreements with the programme country and donors; To ensure that the decisions taken by the Steering Committee are duly recorded and promptly communicated to the members of the Steering Committee, including Participating Agencies, the programme country, and donors, as appropriate; To monitor the implementation of the decisions of the Steering Committee; To report to the MPTF Fiduciary Management Oversight Group on the evolving risks and to flag issues that may affect the implementation of the decisions of the Steering Committee or otherwise impede the operations of the Fund; The UN co-chair, representing the SC, is accountable to the Chair of the MPTF Fiduciary Management Oversight Group, representing the Committee, for the inter-agency fiduciary issues related to the Participating UN Agencies on issues related to funding through the UN for the MPTF activities. 11