AHCA Summary of 2018 Skill Nursing Center Prospective Payment System Final Rule Our rates increase 1.0 percent starting October 1, 2017 July 31, 2017

Similar documents
HIGHLIGHTS. CMS estimates that the net market basket update would increase Medicare SNF payments by approximately $390 million in FY 2018.

Mike Cheek, Senior Vice President, Reimbursement Policy & Legal Affairs. David Gifford, Senior Vice President, Quality and Regulatory Affairs

Medicare Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Prospective Payment System

Final Rule Summary. Medicare Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Prospective Payment System Program Year: FY2018

Medicare Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System

Medicare Long-term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System Fiscal Year 2016

Final Rule Summary. Medicare Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System Program Year: 2019

Medicare Program; Inpatient Psychiatric Facilities Prospective Payment System - Update

About Mediware. + Rehabilitation and Respiratory Care Division years in business. + Specialists Knowledge & Experience. + Solution MediLinks

Medicare Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Prospective Payment System

Medicare Skilled Nursing Facility Prospective Payment System: Proposed Rule Federal Fiscal Year 2015 June 2014

Current State of Medicare. Robert Roth & John Hellow Hooper, Lundy & Bookman, PC

Current State of Medicare

Medicare Program; FY 2017 Inpatient Psychiatric Facilities Prospective Payment. AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.

Medicare Long-term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System Fiscal Year 2017

Medicare Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Prospective Payment System

Prospective Payment System for Long Term Care Hospitals: RY 2008 Proposed Rule

Medicare Long- Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System Final Rule Federal Fiscal Year 2013 August 2012

Medicare Program; Prospective Payment System and Consolidated. Billing for Skilled Nursing Facilities for FY 2009

Medicare Home Health Prospective Payment System

Estimate of Federal Payment Reductions to Hospitals Following the ACA

Medicare Long Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013

Medicare Program; FY 2018 Inpatient Psychiatric Facilities Prospective Payment System. AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.

Peter Gruhn, Senior Director of Research Elise Smith, Senior Vice President, Finance Policy and Legal Affairs

AT A GLANCE HOME HEALTH PPS: PROPOSED RULE FOR CY August 4, What You Can Do: Arial 12pt. The Issue:

FY 2015 Inpatient PPS Proposed Rule: What You Need to Know. June 18, 2014

A Practical Discussion of Value and Quality Based Payments What Do I Do Now?

Acumen, LLC 500 Airport Blvd., Suite 365 Burlingame, CA CMS Contract Mo. HHSM , Task Order HHSM-500-T0008

A unified payment system for post-acute care. Carol Carter September 25, 2017

SUMMARY: This proposed rule requests public comment on proposed implementation for

Medicare Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System

Chapter 12 Addendum L (CY 2014) Annual Home Health Agency Prospective Payment System (HHA PPS) Rate Updates - CY 2014

Chapter 12 Addendum K (CY 2014) Annual Home Health Agency Prospective Payment System (HHA PPS) Rate Updates - CY 2014

Medicare Program; Advancing Care Coordination Through Episode Payment. Models (EPMs); Cardiac Rehabilitation Incentive Payment Model; and Changes to

Department of Health and Human Services

How We Win. Our Specific Challenges 1. Changing Payment Models 2. CMS 3. Legislative. Mark Parkinson, AHCA/NCAL President & CEO January 27, 2015

Peter Gruhn, Director of Research. Below are highlights of the key components of the CMS notice, which is followed by a more detailed overview.

OPPS Webinar Information

Quality Payment Program Year 3

(Final payment amounts per 60-day episodes ending on or after January 1, 2013 and before January 1, Continuing Calendar Year (CY) update.

Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (HR. 2; MACRA)

PRIMER: MACRA and the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Tara O Neill Hayes January 31, 2016

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act All CMS Provisions -- As of June 11, 2010

Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) January Meeting Summary

UnityPoint Accountable Care Aligning Provider Incentives in Risk- Bearing, Value-Based Contracts. March 10, 2018

Medicare Program; Request for Information Regarding the Physician Self-Referral Law. AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.

Introduction. Incentive Payments for. Health Care Regulatory and Compliance Insights. Daniel F. Gottlieb, Esq.

Forward-Looking Statements

Rulemaking implementing the Exchange provisions, summarized in a separate HPA document.

Coverage Expansion [Sections 310, 323, 324, 341, 342, 343, 344, and 1701]

John Hellow Robert Roth Martin Corry

Performance Measurement Work Group Meeting 01/17/2018

Medicare Payment Cut Analysis November 2013 Update -Version 1, November 2013-

The 2018 Advance Notice and Draft Call Letter for Medicare Advantage

Executive Summary: Hospital episode initiators: Change in mandatory MSAs:

Introduction to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Payment Process

SNF Market Trends. Understanding the Changes Impacting Our Business. Trend 1: Medicaid Managed Care

AHLA March Hospital IPPS Legislative and Regulatory Policy Update. John R. Hellow

AAOS MACRA Proposed Rule Summary (Short)

Medicare s Shared Savings Program: Accountable Care Organizations Proposed Rule

Medicare Program Changes in Senate-Passed H.R. 3590

September 6, Re: CMS-1600-P; CY 2014 Physician Fee Schedule Proposed rule comments

All About APMs: What Will It Take for Physicians to Earn the APM Bonus Under MACRA?

CLICK TO EDIT MASTER TEXT STYLES

Medicare Outpatient Prospective Payment System for Calendar Year 2014

Agenda. Medicare Updates. Who s Who. Alyssa Keefe California Hospital Association. Current Fiscal Environment and the President s Budget

A leading provider of post acute services

No change from proposed rule. healthcare providers and suppliers of services (e.g.,

Medicare Program; Medicare Part B Monthly Actuarial Rates, Premium Rate, and. AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.

CMS PROPOSES KEY PROVISIONS OF MACRA PHYSICIAN PAYMENT SYSTEM FOR 2019

2018 Budgeting Tune Up

CY 2018 Quality Payment Program Final Rule Summary

Beneficiary co-insurance for OPPS services is projected to decrease from 19.9 percent in CY 2015 to 19.3 percent in CY 2016.

MEDICARE LEGISLATIVE UPDATE: THE SGR AND SO MUCH MORE AHLA INSTITUTE ON MEDICARE AND MEDICAID PAYMENT ISSUES MARCH 26-28, 2014

Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA)

2018 Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Cost Performance Category Fact Sheet

340B Drug Pricing Program Ceiling Price and Manufacturer Civil Monetary Penalties. AGENCY: Health Resources and Services Administration, HHS.

Payment for Physician and Other Health Care Professional Services Purchased by Indian

MEDICAID: STATE DISPROPORTIONATE SHARE HOSPITAL ALLOTMENT REDUCTIONS FOR FYs 2014 AND 2015 FINAL RULE SUMMARY. September 17, 2013

FY 2018 DRG Updates. Under both the Medicare PPS and the TRICARE DRG-based payment system, cases are

Medicare Program; Medicare Part B Monthly Actuarial Rates, Premium Rates, and. AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.

Final Policy, Payment, and Quality Provisions in the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule for Calendar Year 2018

Medicare Program; Medicare Part B Monthly Actuarial Rates, Premium Rate, and. AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.

HEALTH POLICY & EDUCATION SERIES

AMERICAN COLLEGE OF GASTROENTEROLOGY MAKING $ENSE OF MACRA

Final Rule Summary. Medicare Advancing Care Coordination through Episode Payment Models Program Years: October 1, December 31, 2021

2015 National Training Program. Lessons. Lesson 1 Legislative Updates. Module 4. Current Topics. July 2015

Application, Review and Reporting Process for Waivers for State Innovation Summary of Proposed Rule Revised March 18, 2011

Revision of Certain Market Basket Updates and Productivity Adjustment

KHCA / kcal OCTOBER 30, 2015

Medicaid Program; Disproportionate Share Hospital Payments Uninsured Definition

Highlights from the proposed rule include the following:

Medicaid Program; Disproportionate Share Hospital Payments Treatment of Third. AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.

STATEMENT OF MANAGERS FOR THE MEDICARE, MEDICAID, AND SCHIP BENEFITS IMPROVEMENT AND PROTECTION ACT OF 2000

Healthcare Reform and Its Impact on the Care Delivery System

Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA): Summary and Timeline

2018 Calendar of Key Anticipated Health Care Rules

Subject HHS Commentary From Preamble Regulatory Provision Agent Specific Provisions Definition of Agent/Broker

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Medicare Part C Policy Mailbox Division of Policy, Analysis, and Planning (DPAP) Last Updated: November 6, 2017

Transcription:

AHCA Summary of 2018 Skill Nursing Center Prospective Payment System Final Rule Our rates increase 1.0 percent starting October 1, 2017 July 31, 2017 Today, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued the final rule [CMS- 1679-F] for Fiscal Year (FY) 2018 Medicare payment rates and quality program provisions for skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). Of note, comments on the separately released Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) [CMS-1686-ANPRM], or pre-rule, are due on August 25, 2017. CMS may, or may not, act on the Resident Classification System proposal discussed in the pre-rule. Final FY18 Payment Rule The final rule for FY 2018 establishes a net market basket increase of 1.0 percent. CMS also revised and rebased the market basket index by updating the base year from FY 2010 to FY 2014 (see below). Based on proposed changes contained within this proposed rule, CMS projects aggregate payments to SNFs will increase in FY 2018 by $370 million, or 1.0 percent, from payments in FY 2017. The $370 million amount differs from the estimated $390 million in the proposed rule. In addition to the payment system updates, CMS also notes three sections in the Long Term Care Requirements of Participation which it believed cause undue provider burden and invites payment and regulatory ideas for submission to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation. Finally, the proposed rule included two opportunities to innovate in SNF policy and broader Medicare policy. Specifically, for FY 2018, the update is a result of last year s permanent doc fix, which required all post-acute care (PAC) providers to receive a maximum market basket update of 1.0 percent in FY 2018 to offset part of the cost of the bill. The FY 2018 update would have otherwise been a net increase of 2.3 percent, which reflects an increase of 2.6 percent minus a 0.4 percent multifactor productivity adjustment as required by Section 3401(b) of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). No forecast error was incurred. CMS is also proposing that beginning in FY 2018, SNFs that do not satisfy the reporting requirements for the FY 2018 SNF Quality Reporting Program (QRP) would have a penalty of a 2.0 percent reduction to the SNF market basket percentage change for that fiscal year, after any applicable adjustments. With application of this penalty, those SNFs that do not meet the reporting requirements would receive a market basket update of negative 1.0 percent. 1

Additionally, CMS proposed to revise and rebase the market basket base year from federal fiscal year 2010 to 2014. CMS updates the market basket base year every three to five years. The last rebase year was 2014. Of note, CMS finalized its proposal to transition from a federal fiscal base year to calendar base year 2014. Additionally, CMS finalized its proposal to take a more granular approach to developing the cost category weights for the 2014-based SNF market basket. CMS specified several elements of the SNF Value-based Purchasing (VBP) program, including a formula to translate SNF performance into incentive payments as well as how and when the Agency intends to publish SNF performance for the public. The rule also includes updates to the Quality Reporting Program (QRP), including modifications to existing SNF QRP measures as well as adoption of additional measures. Below please find a highlights section and preliminary overview of the payment updates, the SNF Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) program new components, and the IMPACT Act quality reporting additions. Comments, suggestions and questions may be directed to Mike Cheek. To view the FY18 Final Rule click here, the fact sheet is available here, and the FY18 SNF PPS wage index will be posted here in the coming weeks. 2

HIGHLIGHTS The proposed rule provides for a net market basket increase for SNFs of 1.0 percent beginning October 1, 2017. CMS is also proposing to revise and rebase the market basket index by updating the base year from FY 2010 to CY 2014. The 1.0 percent market basket update reflects a full market basket increase of 2.6 percent reduced by 0.4 percentage points, in accordance with the multifactor productivity adjustment required by Section 3401(b) of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). No forecast error was incurred. The market basket 1.0 percent for FY 2018 for the SNF PPS is based on the IHS Global Insight, Inc. (IGI) second quarter 2017 forecast with historical data through the first quarter 2017. CMS estimates that the net market basket update would increase Medicare SNF payments by approximately $370 million in FY 2018. In terms of the $20 million difference from the proposed rule, this final rule sets forth updates of the SNF PPS rates contained in the SNF PPS final rule for FY 2017 (81 FR 51970). CMS estimates that the aggregate impact is an increase of $370 million in payments to SNFs in FY 2018, resulting from the SNF market basket update to the payment rates, as required by section 1888(e)(5)(B)(iii) of the Act. The updated SNF baseline spending figure for the final rule which reflects baseline spending from the FY 2018 President s budget, as opposed to that used in the proposed rule which was based on the mid-session review of the FY 2017 President s budget. As noted above, a forecast error correction was not needed. Since the difference between the estimated and actual amount of change in the market basket index was below the 0.5 percentage point threshold in FY 2016, the payment rates for FY 2018 are not impacted by the current IGI data. In accordance with the Medicare Modernization Act (MMA), the per diem rate for SNF patients with Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) had been increased by 128 percent as of October 1, 2004. Under the CMS proposed rule, this add-on will remain in effect for FY 2018. CMS proposes that beginning in FY 2018, SNFs that do not satisfy the reporting requirements for the FY 2018 SNF Quality Reporting Program (QRP), would have a penalty of a 2.0 percent reduction to the SNF market basket percentage change for that fiscal year, after any applicable adjustments. With application of this penalty, those SNFs that do not meet the reporting requirements would receive a market basket update of negative 1.0 percent for FY 2018. As noted earlier, the Skilled Nursing Facility VBP Program (SNF VBP) is discussed. Establishment of the program, which implements a 2 percent withhold to SNF Part A payments that can be earned back based on a SNF s rehospitalization rate and level of improvement, is required by the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014 (PAMA). 3

CMS proposes that the performance period be based on the calendar year starting January 1, 2017. In the final rule, CMS finalizes that the total amount of funds that would be available to for incentive payments for qualifying facilities in a fiscal year would be 60 percent of the amounts withheld from SNFs claims. The SNF NPRM contains a section on the SNF Quality Reporting Program (QRP), which is how CMS is operationalizing the IMPACT Act legislation. Last year, CMS finalized four measures for the SNF QRP and specified the changes necessary in the MDS. CMS also finalized the timeline for implementation of the SNF QRP measures from the 2016 and 2017 rules. Beginning with the FY 2020 SNF QRP, CMS moved forward with its proposal to remove the current pressure ulcer measure entitled Percent of Residents of Patients with Pressure Ulcers That Are New or Worsened (Short Stay) (NQF #0678) and to replace it with a modified version of the measure entitled Changes in Skin Integrity Post-Acute Care: Pressure Ulcer/Injury. Below is a more detailed discussion of the proposed rule. After each section, we have provided the contact information for AHCA staff whom you may contact with questions. 4

DISCUSSION I. The SNF Market Basket A. The SNF PPS Market Basket Update Section 411(a) of the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) of 2015 (Pub. L. 114-10, enacted on April 16, 2015) required all post-acute care (PAC) providers to receive a maximum of a 1.0 percent update to rates in FY 2018 to help offset the cost of the legislation. As such, this proposed rule provides for a net market basket increase for SNFs of 1.0 percent beginning October 1, 2017. Absent Section 411(a) of the MACRA, the FY 2018 market basket update would have reflected a full market basket increase of 2.6 percentage points, minus a 0.4 percentage point multifactor productivity adjustment required by Section 3401(b) of the ACA. No forecast error adjustment was incurred. CMS estimates that the net market basket update of 1.0 percent would increase Medicare SNF payments by approximately $390 million in FY 2018. B. Forecast Error Adjustment to the SNF Market Basket The regulations at 42 CFR 413.337(d)(2) provide for an adjustment to account for market basket forecast error. Adjustments consider the forecast error from the most recently available fiscal year for which there is final data and apply the difference between the forecasted and actual change in the market basket when the difference exceeds a specified threshold. CMS originally used a 0.25 percentage point threshold for this purpose but adopted a 0.5 percentage point threshold effective for FY 2008 and subsequent fiscal years. The adjustment reflects both upward and downward adjustments, as appropriate. For FY 2016 (the most recently available FY for which there is final data), the estimated increase in the market basket index was 2.3 percentage points, and the actual increase for FY 2016 was also 2.3 percentage points, resulting in no difference between the actual increase and the estimated increase. Because the difference between the estimated and actual amount of change in the market basket index was 0 (and therefore does not exceeds the 0.5 percentage point threshold), the FY 2018 market basket receives no forecast error adjustment. As noted earlier, an adjustment could be incurred in the final rule using more current IGI data. Table 1 shows the forecasted and actual market basket amounts for FY 2016. Table 1 Difference Between the Forecasted & Actual Market Basket Increases for FY 2016 INDEX FORECASTED FY 2015 INCREASE* *Published in Federal Register; based on second quarter 2015 IGI forecast (2010-based index). **Based on the second quarter 2017 IHS Global Insight forecast, with historical data through 5 ACTUAL FY 2015 INCREASE** FY 2015 DIFFERENCE SNF 2.3 2.3 0.0

the first quarter 2016 (2010-based index). C. Multifactor Productivity Adjustment Section 3401(b) of the ACA requires that in FY 2012 (and in subsequent FYs), the market basket percentage under the SNF payment system as described in section 1888(e)(5)(B)(i) of the Act is to be reduced annually by the productivity adjustment described in section 1886(b)(3)(B)(xi)(II) of the Act. Section 1886(b)(3)(B)(xi)(II) of the Act, added by section 3401(a) of the ACA, sets forth the definition of this productivity adjustment. The statute defines the productivity adjustment to be equal to the 10-year moving average of changes in annual economy-wide private nonfarm business multi-factor productivity (the MFP adjustment). This is projected by the Secretary for the 10-year period ending with the applicable fiscal year, year, cost-reporting period, or other annual period. The Bureau of Labor Statistics is the agency that publishes the official measure of private nonfarm business MFP adjustment. For the FY 2018 update, the MFP adjustment is calculated as the 10-year moving average of changes in MFP for the period ending September 30, 2018, which is estimated to be 0.6 percent. Absent Section 411(a) of the MACRA, which capped the update to PAC providers in FY 2018 at 1.0 percent, the resulting MFP-adjusted SNF market basket update would have been equal to 2.0 percent, or 2.6 percent less 0.6 percentage points. The final update percentages would have been adjusted further by the wage index budget neutrality factor (see below). D. Federal Rate Per Diem Components CMS used the SNF market basket, adjusted for the forecast error correction and the multifactor productivity adjustment, as described above, to adjust each per diem component of the federal rates forward to reflect the change in the average prices for FY 2018 from average prices for FY 2017. CMS indicates it would further adjust the rates by a wage index budget neutrality factor, described later in this section. Tables 2 and 3 reflect the updated components of the unadjusted federal rates for FY 2018 prior to adjustment for case-mix. Of note is that the final unadjusted federal rates for both urban and rural are higher than in the proposed rule. Table 2 RATE COMPONENT PER DIEM AMOUNT FY 2018 Unadjusted Federal Rate Per Diem Urban NURSING THERAPY CASE THERAPY CASE-MIX MIX NON-CASE- MIX NON-CASE MIX $177.16 $133.44 $17.58 $90.42 6

Table 3 FY 2018 Unadjusted Federal Rate Per Diem Rural RATE COMPONEN T PER DIEM AMOUN NURSIN G CASE- MIX THERAPY CASE MIX THERAPY NON- CASE- NON- CASE- MIX $169.24 $153.87 $18.78 $92.09 The proposed wage index will be available on the CMS website here. If you have any questions regarding Section I, please contact Mike Cheek. II. Skilled Nursing Facility Value Based Purchasing Program The Skilled Nursing Facility Value Based Purchasing Program (SNF VBP), which was part of the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014 (PAMA), will cut SNFs Part A payment rates up to 2% based on their national ranking on their re-hospitalization score. In the final rule, CMS provided additional details regarding how the SNF VBP program will operate for the first year of the program and outlined changes that will be made in future years. The SNF VBP program will reduce the total amount of Part A payments made to SNFs by 2% in a fiscal year. A portion of these cuts will be used to fund an incentive pool that will be distributed to providers based on their re-hospitalization performance. In this year s rule, CMS finalized the following major components of the program: 1. Payback Percentage. CMS is mandated to set the total amount of value-based incentive payments to between 50% and 70% of the total amount of reductions to the industry for a fiscal year. Despite AHCA s recommendations to set the payback percentage to 70% to maximize the incentive of providers to lower their SNF RM rates, CMS opted to the set the rate to 60%. CMS stated that setting the rate to 60% will adequately motivated providers to improve their SNF RM rates, while also ensuring the program s long-term sustainability through the additional estimated Medicare trust fund savings. 2. Exchange Function. CMS elected to utilize a logistic exchange function. The exchange function is the formula CMS will use to translate a provider s performance in the SNF RM metric into a value-based incentive payment multiplier. AHCA had recommended that CMS move forward with a logistic function in the FY 2017 rule, because it best incentivizes providers to continuously improve their readmission rates, regardless of their current SNF RM rate and allows for the greatest number of SNFs to receive net positive payments (incentive payment multipliers > 2%). AHCA is currently in the process of developing a dynamic SNF VBP tool that will allow users to estimate the impact to Part A payments, based off provider s forecasted SNF RM rates. Today, the profession is in the middle of the first program years performance measurement window (CY 2017). Providers should 7

continue to monitor their re-hospitalization trends as measured by PointRight Pro30 and the QM re-hospitalization rate used for Five-Star, both measures are currently available on LTC Trend Tracker. AHCA/NCAL staff will be analyzing this section in much greater detail given the impact this will have on SNFs Part A payment rates. Please contact David Gifford or Thomas Martin with any questions on this section. III. Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Quality Reporting Program (QRP) The SNF final rule contains a section on the SNF Quality Reporting Program (QRP), which is how CMS is operationalizing the IMPACT Act legislation. Last year, CMS finalized four measures for the SNF QRP and specified the changes necessary in the MDS. CMS also finalized the timeline for implementation of the SNF QRP measures from the 2016 and 2017 rules. Under the SNF QRP, SNFs that fail to submit the required quality data to CMS will be subject to a 2 percentage point reduction to the otherwise applicable annual market basket percentage update with respect to that fiscal year. In the FY 2018 SNF PPS NPRM, CMS proposed several clarifications, additions and changes to the SNF Quality Reporting Program (QRP), and asked for comment on possible future changes to the program. AHCA had offered extensive comments that CMS acknowledged, however, for the most part, the proposed changes were finalized as proposed. The finalized SNF QRP rules include the following: CMS finalized the replacement of the current pressure ulcer measure with an updated version of that measure and adopting four new measures that address functional status beginning with the FY 2020 program year as follows: CMS finalized their proposal to remove the current pressure ulcer measure, Percent of Residents with Pressure Ulcers That Are New or Worsened (Short Stay)(NQF #0678), from the SNF QRP measure set and to replace it with a modified version of that measure, entitled Changes in Skin Integrity Post-Acute Care: Pressure Ulcer/Injury, for the SNF QRP with an implementation date of October 1, 2018. CMS finalized their proposal to adopt four functional outcome measures, beginning with the FY 2020 SNF QRP: o Application of IRF Functional Outcome Measure: Change in Self-Care Score for Medical Rehabilitation Patients (NQF #2633), o Application of IRF Functional Outcome Measure: Change in Mobility Score for Medical Rehabilitation Patients (NQF #2634), o Application of IRF Functional Outcome Measure: Discharge Self-Care Score for Medical Rehabilitation Patients (NQF #2635), and o Application of IRF Functional Outcome Measure: Discharge Mobility Score for Medical Rehabilitation Patients (NQF #2636) 8

Further, CMS is finalizing that it will begin publicly reporting six new measures for display by fall 2018. These measures include: Assessment-based measures based on the availability of data: o Application of Percent of Long-Term Care Hospital (LTCH) Patients With an Admission and Discharge Functional Assessment and a Care Plan That Addresses Function (NQF #2631); o Percent of Residents or Patients with Pressure Ulcers That Are New or Worsened (NQF #0678); and o Application of Percent of Residents Experiencing One or More Falls with Major Injury (NQF #0674), Claims-based measures: o Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary-PAC SNF QRP; o Discharge to Community-PAC SNF QRP; and o Potentially Preventable 30-Day Post-Discharge Readmission Measure for SNF QRP. In addition, CMS will discontinue the public reporting of data on the assessment-based measure: Percent of Residents or Patients with Pressure Ulcers That Are New or Worsened (Short Stay) (NQF #0678) by October 2020. Finally, CMS also finalized a variety of technical details related to standardizing terminology, reporting periods, provider feedback reports and appeals processes, and other administrative alignment activities, as well as identifying measures and items that qualify as IMPACT Actcompliant. CMS elected not to finalize any of the proposed standardized data elements beyond those that apply to finalized quality measures. AHCA will provide a summary of these in our upcoming detailed analysis of this Final Rule AHCA/NCAL staff will be reviewing the measure specifications carefully over the coming days. The lead contacts for this section are Daniel Ciolek and David Gifford. IV. Other Key Provisions CMS also lays out two items related to regulatory oversight and solicits input on improving Medicare regulation and payment. A. Survey Team Composition CMS addresses confusion as to whether complaint survey teams fall under 488.314 which requires the survey team to include a registered nurse or 488.332 which does not require a registered nurse on the survey team. CMS is proposing that complaint surveys follow the requirement of 488.332, meaning that a complaint survey does not require a registered nurse to participate on the survey team. In the final rule, CMS is adopting its proposal as presented in the proposed rule, which specifies that States may maintain and utilize a specialized team for complaint surveys that need not include a registered nurse for the investigation of complaints. 9

B. Possible Burden Reduction in the Long-Term Care Requirements CMS is asking for feedback regarding the potential impact of revisions to level of detail in the Requirements of Participation in the areas of grievance process, abuse and neglect reporting, QAPI and discharge notice requirement to state Ombudsman. AHCA provided detailed comments related to regulatory burden and proposed specific language for changes to the Requirements of Participation. CMS did not issue any regulatory changes for reeducation of regulatory burden within this final rule. C. Innovation in Medicare CMS invites the SNF provision to bring ideas to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) to be tested under the Innovation Center s demonstration authority. In the proposed rule, CMS specifically suggests the 3-day requirement as a possibility for a demonstration as well as payment ideas. Furthermore, as in the inpatient and long term care hospital rule, CMS is requesting input via a Request for Information ideas on how to reduce Medicare regulatory and payment burden throughout the Medicare program. CMS did not issue responses to comments and recommendations in this section. Conclusion We recognize the addition of VBP and QRP to our annual payment rule represents a significant change in expectations of the profession. AHCA/NCAL is working to ensure coordinated discussions among various CMS divisions to maximize our impact. We hope you find this document useful and look forward to your valuable thoughts and comments. 10