CHAPTER VII DIRECT TESTIMONY OF PATRICK MOERSEN (OVERHEADS) ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

Similar documents
CHAPTER VIII DIRECT TESTIMONY OF NEIL CAYABYAB (INSURANCE) ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

CHAPTER IV DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KAREN C. CHAN ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

CHAPTER III PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF EDWARD J. REYES

CHAPTER III COST TRACKING & REGULATORY TREATMENT PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JOHNNY M. HULEIS

CHAPTER X DIRECT TESTIMONY OF MARJORIE SCHMIDT-PINES (RATES) ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

CHAPTER V PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF REGINALD M. AUSTRIA ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) UPDATED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF S. NASIM AHMED SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

CHAPTER X DIRECT TESTIMONY OF NEIL CAYABYAB ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

SOCALGAS / SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JAMES VANDERHYE (SHARED SERVICES & SHARED ASSETS BILLING, SEGMENTATION & CAPITAL REASSIGNMENTS)

CHAPTER 5 REVENUE REQUIREMENT PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KAREN C. CHAN AND RAMON GONZALES ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF GARY LENART ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

REVISED PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JACK S. LEWIS ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY ADVANCED METERING INFRASTRUCTURE CHAPTER VII SOCALGAS AMI BUSINESS CASE MODELING METHODOLOGY AND REVENUE REQUIREMENT

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JACK S. LEWIS ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

CHAPTER 13 AMI FINANCIAL MODELING. JULY 14, 2006, AMENDMENT Prepared Supplemental, Consolidating, Superseding and Replacement Testimony of SCOTT KYLE

CHAPTER XII DIRECT TESTIMONY OF SHARIM CHAUDHURY ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RYAN HOM (UPDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS REPORT) January 2018

SECOND REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KAREN C. CHAN (WORKING CASH) APRIL 6, 2018

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF EDWARD J. REYES ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KHAI NGUYEN ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JONATHAN B. ATUN CHAPTER 4 ON BEHALF OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF GARRY G. YEE RATE BASE. November 2014

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF GARRY G. YEE ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF MARK A. DIANCIN SHARED SERVICES AND SHARED ASSETS BILLING POLICIES AND PROCESS. November 2014

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JOSEPH MOCK SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

TURN DATA REQUEST-058 SDG&E-SOCALGAS 2019 GRC A /8 SDG&E_SOCALGAS RESPONSE DATE RECEIVED: APRIL 23, 2018 DATE RESPONDED: MAY 7, 2018

SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF STEVEN P. DAIS (WORKING CASH) October 6, 2017 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JAWAAD A. MALIK (POST-TEST YEAR RATEMAKING) April 6, 2018

DIRECT TESTIMONY OF AMANDA D. WHITE SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

CHAPTER 4 COST RECOVERY AND REGULATORY TREATMENT PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF REGINALD M. AUSTRIA ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF GARY G. LENART (REVENUES AT PRESENT AND PROPOSED RATES) March 2015

THIRD REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF IFTEKHARUL (SHARIM) CHAUDHURY (PRESENT AND PROPOSED GAS TRANSPORTATION REVENUE AND RATES) July 31, 2018

ORA DATA REQUEST NUMBER SCG-DR-ORA-047 A SOCALGAS RESPONSE. Subject: Follow Up to SCG DR-ORA-005 Account 923 Outside Services Request

Company: Southern California Gas Company (U 904 G) Proceeding: 2019 General Rate Case Application: A Exhibit: SCG-46-R REVISED SOCALGAS

SECOND REVISED SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KENNETH J. DEREMER (POST-TEST YEAR RATEMAKING) April 6, 2018

SECOND REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF IFTEKHARUL (SHARIM) CHAUDHURY (PRESENT AND PROPOSED GAS TRANSPORTATION REVENUE AND RATES) April 6, 2018

SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF IFTEKHARUL (SHARIM) CHAUDHURY (PRESENT AND PROPOSED GAS TRANSPORTATION REVENUE AND RATES)

Testimony of Stephen E. Pickett

2015 General Rate Case

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RANDALL G. ROSE ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF NORMA G. JASSO (REGULATORY ACCOUNTS) November 2014

REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RONALD M. VAN DER LEEDEN POST-TEST YEAR RATEMAKING. March 2015

INDICATED SHIPPER DATA REQUEST IS-SCG-004 SOCALGAS 2019 GRC A SOCALGAS RESPONSE DATE RECEIVED: FEBRUARY

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF TODD J CAHILL ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation d/b/a National Grid

PREPARED REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF MICHAEL R. WOODRUFF ON BEHALF OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY CHAPTER 16

1. Following is Question 13 of Clean Energy s Third Data Request and SoCalGas response to the data request:

PREPARED REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF SCOTT R. WILDER ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY (PHASE 2)

REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF HUGO MEJIA ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF REGINALD M. AUSTRIA (REGULATORY ACCOUNTS) November 2014

January 12, 2017 Advice Letter 5070

SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF SANDRA K. HRNA (ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE/LEGAL/REGULATORY AFFAIRS/ EXTERNAL AFFAIRS) October 6, 2017

REVISED PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF TODD J. CAHILL ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

Conceptually what specific costs should the compression rate adder recover?

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF MICHAEL W. FOSTER ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

CHAPTER II NEW CURTAILMENT ORDER PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF STEVE WATSON BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

APPENDIX X FORMULA FOR CALCULATING THE ALLOCATED COSTS TO THE CITIZENS BORDER EAST LINE RATE UNDER SDG&E S TRANSMISSION OWNER TARIFF

REVISED UPDATED PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JASON BONNETT SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

PREPARED REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF GARRY G. YEE ON BEHALF OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

January 29, 2018 Advice Letter 5133-G

UPDATE TESTIMONY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AUGUST 2018

RE: Southern California Edison Company s Formula Transmission Rate Annual Update Filing in Docket No. ER (TO11)

Company: Southern California Gas Company (U 904 G) Proceeding: 2019 General Rate Case Application: A Exhibit: SCG-37-2R SECOND REVISED

WORKPAPERS TO PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF MICHAEL A. BERMEL ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

2018 General Rate Case

Residential Line and Service Extension Allowance Testimony. Application No.: Witnesses: C. Silsbee S. Reed J. Schichtl L. Vellanoweth (U 338-E)

Southern California Gas Company Annual Report on the Gas Cost Incentive Mechanism April 1, 2010 through March 31, 2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Public Service Company of Colorado ) Docket No.

TURN DATA REQUEST-036 SDG&E-SOCALGAS 2019 GRC A /8 SDG&E_SOCALGAS RESPONSE DATE RECEIVED: MARCH 22, 2018 DATE RESPONDED: APRIL 5, 2018

CHAPTER III COST TRACKING AND REGULATORY TREATMENT PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF REGINALD M. AUSTRIA ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

ORA DATA REQUEST ORA-SDG&E-DR-007-CL8 SDG&E 2019 GRC A SDG&E RESPONSE DATE RECEIVED: OCTOBER 26, 2017 DATE RESPONDED: NOVEMBER 8, 2017

SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF MICHELLE A. SOMERVILLE MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES. November 2014

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO

Subject: Core Pricing Flexibility and Noncore Competitive Load Growth Opportunities Programs

APPENDIX IX ATTACHMENT 1 FORMULA RATE PROTOCOLS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. ) Southern California Edison ) Docket No. ER Company )

PREPARED SUPPLEMENTAL TESTIMONY OF SIM-CHENG FUNG SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY ) DOCKET NO.

2015 General Rate Case

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Southern California Edison Company s Supplemental Exhibit in Response to Administrative Law Judge s May 6, Ruling

SoCalGas Response: Attached are the draft 2006 business cases.

SECOND REVISED SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RAGAN G. REEVES (TAXES) April 6, 2018 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF ROBERT C. LANE ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY ADVANCED METERING INFRASTRUCTURE CHAPTER II SUMMARY OF AMI BUSINESS CASE

STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

SDG&E REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF CYNTHIA S. FANG (ELECTRIC RATES AND BILL COMPARISON) JUNE 18, 2018

WORKPAPERS TO PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF DEBBIE S. ROBINSON ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

JOINT SETTLEMENT COMPARISON EXHIBIT SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY TEST YEAR 2008 GENERAL RATE CASE

SOCALGAS/SDG&E REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF CHARLES MANZUK (CASE MANAGEMENT EXHIBIT) JUNE 18, 2018

a. Of materials procured over the last three years, what proportion of the amount spent was for products produced in California? Please explain.

EXETER ASSOCIATES, INC Little Patuxent Parkway Suite 300 Columbia, Maryland 21044

) ) ) ) ) ) ) REVISED REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF STEVE WATSON SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

2015 General Rate Case

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY ON BEHALF OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY (DESCRIPTION OF THE UNREGULATED SUBSIDIARY AND ITS INTERACTIONS WITH SDG&E)

TURN DATA REQUEST-082 SDG&E-SOCALGAS 2019 GRC A /8 SDG&E_SOCALGAS RESPONSE DATE RECEIVED: JULY 12, 2018 DATE RESPONDED: JULY 27, 2018

Transcription:

Application No: A.1--XXX Exhibit No.: Witness: P. Moersen Application of Southern California Gas Company (U 0 G) and San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U 0 G) for Review of Costs Incurred in Executing Pipeline Safety Enhancement Plan Application A.1--XXX CHAPTER VII DIRECT TESTIMONY OF PATRICK MOERSEN (OVERHEADS) ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA November 1, 01

TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. PURPOSE AND OVERVIEW OF TESTIMONY...1 II. OVERHEADS...1 III. PSEP INSURANCE COSTS... IV. CONCLUSION... V. WITNESS QUALIFICATIONS... -i-

I. PURPOSE AND OVERVIEW OF TESTIMONY The purpose of my direct testimony on behalf of Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas) and San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E) is to explain the allocation of company overheads to Pipeline Safety Enhancement Plan (PSEP) projects. II. OVERHEADS The Capital and Operations and Maintenance (O&M) costs of completing a project 1 1 1 1 consist of both direct costs and indirect (or overhead) costs where the sum amounts to the fullyloaded cost. Direct costs are for those activities and services that support a specific project, such as labor costs which include salaries of staff employees, and non-labor costs which includes contract labor, purchased services, and materials required for a specific project. 1 These costs are charged directly to the project since they are readily identifiable and can be directly traced. Indirect costs are for those activities and services that are associated with direct costs such as payroll taxes and pension and benefits which benefit a project but are not directly charged. Indirect costs are incorporated into the costs presented for review in this Application. 1 For PSEP, direct costs also include PSEP programmatic costs or PSEP General Management and Administration (GMA) costs. These PSEP GMAs are support costs that are not attributable to specific projects but are incurred to build out the foundational elements of PSEP and support the PSEP program, including the organization, departments, processes, and procedures, which support project-specific activities. GMAs are discussed in greater detail in Chapter V (Mejia) and Chapter VI (Tran). Total indirect costs applied to capital projects consist of: Overheads, Allowance for Funds Used During Construction (AFUDC), and Property Tax. AFUDC is the net cost for borrowed funds used for construction purposes plus a reasonable rate on other funds, such as equity. The calculation of AFUDC follows Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Code of Federal Regulations found under item 1 of the Gas Plant Instruction of Part 01. Additionally, Resolution G- grants SoCalGas a modification to the FERC AFUDC formula. Capitalization of property tax for both SDG&E and SoCalGas was ordered by the CPUC in Decision (D).1-0-0. -1-

On a monthly basis, the Affiliate Billing and Costing teams at SoCalGas and SDG&E review overhead activity and set overhead rates that take into account the particular overhead s loading base, pool activity, and historical and budgeted data. Once reviewed and approved, overhead rates are input into the SAP accounting system. Through the accounting system, overhead rates are applied to Capital and O&M cost inputs monthly in accordance with its classification, i.e., company labor, contract labor, purchased services, and materials. Because PSEP is an incremental project, only incremental overhead loaders are included in this proceeding for recovery. For example, overheads associated with incremental labor are included since they will proportionately increase as a result of SoCalGas and SDG&E PSEP activities. The following overheads are allocated to PSEP projects and included for recovery: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 Payroll Tax represents SoCalGas and SDG&E s portion of required contributions to the state and federal governments for State Unemployment Insurance, Federal Unemployment Insurance, and Federal Retirement and Medical Insurance; Vacation and Sick time represents costs paid by SoCalGas and SDG&E for employees non-productive time, such as vacation and sick days, holidays, and jury duty; Benefits (non-balanced only) represents benefits such as medical and dental; Workers Compensation represents cost of expected payments to employees for work-related injuries, plus the cost of workers compensation insurance premiums to cover claims over a certain dollar amount; Loading base represents all the associated direct costs to which the overhead will be applied. For example, payroll tax will be applied to labor costs. Pool activity represents the actual direct costs of the overhead which are recorded to an account referred to as a pool. Non-balanced benefits exclude Pension and Post-Retirement Benefits Other Than Pensions (PBOPs) which are subject to separate balancing account treatment. Non-balanced benefits include employee benefits such as medical and dental. --

1 1 1 Public Liability / Property Damage represents the cost of expected payments to third parties for liability and property damage claims submitted to SoCalGas and SDG&E plus the cost of insurance premiums; Incentive Compensation Plan represents the incentive compensation plan costs paid to employees based on individual and company performance as compared to preestablished goals; Purchasing represents costs related to the procurement activity in obtaining goods and services for SoCalGas and SDG&E; Administrative and General represents the cost of administrative and general support provided by functional areas such as Accounting and Finance, Human Resources, Information Technology, and Tax; and PSEP Insurance represents additional insurance obtained for PSEP work performed by third party contractors and allocated to PSEP Capital and O&M projects through a separate insurance overhead loader. 1 1 III. PSEP INSURANCE COSTS The PSEP-specific insurance policies under the Owner Controlled Insurance Program 1 1 1 0 1 (OCIP), which is discussed further in Chapter VIII (Cayabyab), provides coverage specifically related to contractors working on various aspects of PSEP-related activities. No non-psep activities are covered by the OCIP. As OCIP costs are directly attributable to PSEP activities, accounting processes were developed to facilitate the appropriate accounting for the policy premium payments and subsequent allocation to specific PSEP projects. The following summarizes the accounting and allocation processes related to OCIP coverage. As part of the OCIP allocation process, a specific overhead was created to load OCIP cost based on the contractor costs incurred on each project. Accounting procedures were implemented to record contractor costs to a specific cost element on existing and future PSEP In accordance with D.1-1-0, included in the PSEP Insurance amount submitted for review in this proceeding are costs associated with projects submitted for review in A.1-1-01. --

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 internal orders. The contractor costs incurred on each project provide the basis for allocation of OCIP premiums (i.e., contractor costs incurred establish the loading base ). OCIP overhead cost pool (allocable costs) includes the applicable premium costs that are applied to PSEP project internal orders. The process outlined below summarizes the steps related to the overhead pool allocation. The OCIP costs were incurred at Sempra Energy and subsequently billed to SoCalGas and SDG&E. To calculate the billing an allocation percentage was provided to Sempra Energy that was used to split the premium costs between SoCalGas and SDG&E. As the payment of insurance premium costs are initially recorded as pre-paid insurance, the Financial Accounting department established an amortization schedule for the pre-paid insurance account based on the term of the policy. Based on the amortized cost, the Financial Accounting department records an accounting entry for the monthly amortization of pre-paid insurance premiums. These recurring journal entries, along with applicable service fees, provide the funding to the OCIP cost pool which is subsequently allocated to specific PSEP projects as part of the monthly accounting close process. Additional detail regarding the OCIP costs by projects are available in the accompanying workpapers. The incremental overheads discussed above, with totals provided below, are the only overheads sought to be reviewed in this Application. SoCalGas and SDG&E are not seeking recovery of non-incremental overheads that are currently recovered in base rates. Examples of non-incremental overheads for which SoCalGas and SDG&E do not seek review in this See Ch. VII (Moersen) workpapers. --

proceeding include: Warehouse, Fleet, Shop, Small Tools, Supervision/Engineering, and Department Overhead Replacement. Table 1 SoCalGas Overhead Costs ($000 s) SoCalGas Capital O&M Total Payroll Taxes,,1 Vacation & Sick,,00 Benefits (non-balanced),00, Workers Compensation 0 Public Liability/ Property Damage 1 0 Incentive Compensation Plan,, Purchasing,1 0,0 Administrative & General, 0, PSEP Insurance,,,01 Total Overhead Costs,,1,01 Table SDG&E Overhead Costs ($000 s) SDG&E Capital O&M Total Payroll Taxes Vacation & Sick 1 Benefits (non-balanced) 1 Workers Compensation 0 Public Liability/ Property Damage 1 1 1 Incentive Compensation Plan 1,0 1, Purchasing Administrative & General,,1 PSEP Insurance 0 1,0 Total Overhead Costs,,1 The overhead costs shown in the SoCalGas table are reflective of overheads applied to direct costs Labor and Non-Labor. Not included in the figures are overheads applied to projects by a journal entry. Total overhead costs shown in the SDG&E table are reflective of overheads applied to direct costs Labor and Non-Labor. Not included in the figures are overheads applied to projects by a journal entry. --

IV. CONCLUSION The overheads applied to PSEP are calculated and allocated reasonably. SoCalGas and SDG&E request that the Commission find that SoCalGas and SDG&E have appropriately applied overhead costs to the PSEP projects presented in this Application and approve those costs for rate recovery. This concludes my prepared Direct Testimony. --

1 1 1 1 V. WITNESS QUALIFICATIONS My name is Patrick Moersen. My business address is W. Fifth Street, Los Angeles, CA 001-. I am employed by Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas) as the Financial Services Manager overseeing the rate base, depreciation, sundry billing and affiliate billing, and costing functions including overheads, in the SoCalGas Accounting Operations department. I received a Bachelor of Science degree in Business with an emphasis in Finance from California State University of Northridge in. I also received a Master of Business Administration with an emphasis in Finance from California Lutheran University in 1. I have been employed by SoCalGas in various positions and responsibilities since 1. My experience has included positions in Internal Audit, Financial Planning, Accounts Payable, Treasury, Cash Management, and Asset and Project Accounting. My current responsibilities include managing the rate base and depreciation functions, affiliate billing and sundry billing, and costing function including overheads for SoCalGas. I have previously testified before this Commission. --