BELGIAN TAX REFORM WHAT'S THE IMPACT ON THE INVESTMENT FUND SECTOR?

Similar documents
BELGIAN 2018 CORPORATE TAX REFORM ACT PUBLISHED TODAY WHAT'S THE IMPACT FOR OUR CLIENTS' BUSINESSES?

TAXING CAPITAL GAINS MADE BY NON- RESIDENTS DISPOSING OF UK COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY FROM APRIL A BOMBSHELL

MIFID2 FOR ASIAN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS POSITION LIMITS: HARMONISATION, MONITORING AND REPORTING DECEMBER 2017

DUTCH BILL IMPLEMENTING REVISED SHAREHOLDERS' RIGHTS DIRECTIVE SENT TO PARLIAMENT

MIFID2 ASIAN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS BEST EXECUTION SEPTEMBER 2017

THE FUTURE UK CORPORATE ENERGY AND CARBON REPORTING FRAMEWORK AND THE END OF THE CRC SCHEME

CHANGES TO THE UK NUCLEAR LIABILITY REGIME: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE INDUSTRY

THE TAX IMPACT OF BREXIT: WHAT STEPS SHOULD UK AND EU BUSINESSES TAKE NOW?

Investment funds and REITs new rules

New product documentation for Wiqayah Min Taqallub As'aar Assarf (Islamic Foreign Exchange Forwards)

THE REGULATORY LANDSCAPE OF BREXIT FOR CLOs: WHERE TO FROM HERE?

UAE securities regulator creates regime for promotion and introduction to UAE investors

THE EUROPEAN UNION (WITHDRAWAL) ACT CHRIS BATES

HONG KONG NEW OPEN-ENDED FUND COMPANY STRUCTURE GOES LIVE IN JULY 2018

ABS New Markets Japan

SECOND CONSULTATION ON PROPOSED PAYMENTS REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

CRYPTO-TRADING IN THE ABU DHABI GLOBAL MARKET READY FOR BUSINESS

China extends foreign exchange cash pooling pilot programme to multinationals

Mandatory tax strategies, a code of practice and "special measures" a new era for corporates?

INTRODUCTION OF A NEW LUXEMBOURG RENEWABLE ENERGY COVERED BOND REGIME

Modernisation of Luxembourg Company Law

BREXIT: WHAT NEXT FOR UK PENSIONS?

ALTERNATIVE FINANCING: CREATING THE NEW GENERATION OF "FINANCING" FUNDS

Public-to-private implementation in Poland

CHINA S ONE BELT, ONE ROAD: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES

NDRC replaces approval regime with filing regime for foreign debt control and other legal updates from China

The SCA approves Regulations concerning Securities Lending and Borrowing, Short Selling, Market Making and Liquidity Providers

HKMA IMPLEMENTS MEASURES TO REFINE MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTABILITY

New Listing Rules of the Moscow Exchange come into force

CRA3: Commission Adopts Detailed Disclosure Rules for Structured Finance Instruments

WITHHOLDING TAX REVOLUTION? THE EFFECT OF THE BEPS MULTILATERAL CONVENTION ON CROSS-BORDER DEBT AND EQUITY INVESTMENTS

FAILURE TO PREVENT THE FACILITATION OF TAX EVASION THE NEW EXTRA-TERRITORIAL UK CRIMINAL OFFENCE AND ITS IMPACT ON PRIVATE EQUITY

OHADA LAW IMPACTS OF THE DEMATERIALISATION OF SECURITIES

China Opens for Mobile Virtual Network Operator

Qatar's Corporate Legal Framework

The EU regulation on reporting and transparency of securities financing transactions another piece in the jigsaw of shadow banking regulation

Introduction to Islamic Financial Risk Management Products

Key issues. Client memorandum. February CFTC Exemptions 1

Highlight on solar energy tariffs in France

EU PROPOSAL FOR SCREENING OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENTS

CLAIMANTS UNBOUND DIRECT ACTIONS AGAINST INSURERS UNDER THE BRUSSELS I REGULATION

WHITE PAPER: APPLICABILITY OF U.S. RISK RETENTION RULES TO STRUCTURED AIRCRAFT PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS

PRC STATE COUNCIL ISSUES GUIDELINES ON OVERSEAS INVESTMENTS

1. Changes to the cash equivalent transfer value legislation

Proposed changes to Australia's foreign investment regime

THE FUTURE OF BANK FINANCE NEW EU RULES FOR LOSS ABSORBENCY, SUBORDINATION AND HOLDING COMPANIES

MAJOR CHANGES TO SINGAPORE CAPITAL MARKETS REGULATORY FRAMEWORK IMPLEMENTED

Remuneration voting 2015 AGM season. CA Brochure_Remuneration Voting (Dinesh Rajan).indd 1

EUROPEAN COMMISSION TAKES AIM AT UK CFC TAX REGIME

Foreign direct investments in Polish Special Economic Zones

OTC derivatives: Reporting exemption for certain foreign entities in Australia

Particular disclosure duties regarding the acquisition and disposal of participations in German banks and insurance companies.

The new UK Bribery Act: why you need to be prepared

New AML Regime for the DIFC

MAS publishes proposals to enhance regulatory safeguards for investors

A MAJOR STEP TOWARDS A SINGLE AFRICAN MARKET

Liability Management in Russia

International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.

LABOUR'S PROPOSED UK FINANCIAL TRANSACTION TAX WHAT IT MEANS FOR INVESTORS, INSTITUTIONS AND BUSINESSES

SMALL CHANGE: LITTLE MOVEMENT IN LATEST APAC TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL RANKINGS

FSMA Consults on New Rules on the Marketing of Financial Products in Belgium and on Product Bans 1

(for example, there is some suggestion that the Regulator's "Trustee Toolkit" could form a suitable professional qualification).

MAS consults on proposed regulatory framework for OTC Derivatives Intermediaries

Article 55 of the BRRD: contractual recognition of bail-in what you need to do

Amendment to the Real Estate Joint Enterprise Act - Possible Expanded Application of the TK/GK Scheme

1. Budget Key issues

Article 55 of the BRRD: contractual recognition of bail-in what you need to do

Recent Developments in Assets Securitisation in the PRC

Marketing of AIF by non-eu AIFM / Third Country Managers in Germany after 21 July 2013

Renminbi Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor Scheme Scaled Up

BREXIT: WILL THE UK REMAIN IN THE EEA DESPITE LEAVING THE EU?

OFFSHORE WIND: OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) AGREEMENTS

Shareholder Rights Directive II is it on your radar?

Restructuring Across Borders

India's New Merger Control Regime: Final Regulations Published

LIBOR CROSS PRODUCT REVIEW

The Greek debt crisis and loan agreements

Saving time and headaches clearing the antitrust hurdle for mergers and acquisitions

1. Clifford Chance Qatar team 3. Corporate practice... 3 Projects and Finance practice... 3

DC flexibility: providing DC access through external providers.

UK covered bonds a head start on the key considerations and possible implications

Germany upfront fees in syndicated lending in light of recent Federal Court of Justice judgements

THE FUTURE UK-EU RELATIONSHIP RE-EXAMINING THE EEA AND OTHER OPTIONS

Elephant spotting Risk Retention under the CRR

Samurai Bonds. What are Samurai Bonds? Are any securities filings required to issue Samurai Bonds? Key issues

THE EU SECURITISATION REGULATION DO I NEED TO WORRY?

Singapore s new personal data protection legislation and how it compares to data protection legislation in other jurisdictions

M&A The Global Picture

New Circular to Relax the Filing Process

Impact of a break up of the Eurozone on Credit Derivatives Transactions

Implications of Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA)

Welcome to the May 2017 edition of the UK: Pensions Update.

For a few dollars more. company rescue proposals

Guide to becoming a self-employed lawyer

MiFID II 18 January MiFID II

New product documentation for Mubadalatul Arbaah (Profit Rate Swaps)

Grease, gift or graft? Boundaries of business courtesies in China

MORE THAN A TOKEN RISK ICO TRADING PLATFORMS AND PROMOTERS IN SEC CROSSHAIRS

The pension scheme master trust market in 2018/19

SEC RENEWS FOCUS ON CRYPTOCURRENCIES AND INITIAL COIN OFFERINGS

Transcription:

Aside from the general 2018 Belgian corporate tax reform which was addressed in our previous client briefing, several other specific measures have been introduced with a particular impact for the investment funds sector. We have briefly summarised the most important of the newlyadopted measures and the impact they will have on our clients' business. If you have any queries or would like to obtain further information, please contact any of the persons listed in the contacts section. Increased taxation for investors in debt investment companies/funds In case of a sale of or repurchase of shares in (and liquidation of) an investment company/fund (UCI) investing more than 25% of its assets in debt instruments/receivables, a 30% withholding tax must be withheld by the paying agent on the interest portion received by the Belgian tax resident individual (including interest and capital gains on debt instruments/receivables), provided that the UCI qualifies as a capitalisation" investment company/fund. Three changes are made to this tax which extend its scope of application. First, the 25% threshold mentioned above is reduced to 10%. This threshold should, in principle, be computed by each UCI, which must then inform the paying agents to this effect so that the paying agents can apply the correct tax treatment. The result of this change is that more investment companies and funds will be caught by the tax (including equity funds holding cash or short term deposits on an ancillary basis). Secondly, the notion of 'UCI' has been extended to cover not only UCIs investing in transferrable securities, but also AIFs investing in other types of assets (with possibly unexpected consequences for certain investments in, for example, a FIIS/GVBF, hedge funds, etc.). These two changes are applicable to income paid or attributed in respect of UCI shares/units which were acquired as from 1 January 2018. January 2018 Clifford Chance 1

Thirdly, with respect to contractual investment funds (FCP/GBF), this tax will now be due upon receipt by the fund of the taxable (interest) income and no longer upon disposal/repurchase of the fund's units or the liquidation of the fund. For investment companies, on the contrary, the tax trigger will remain the disposal/repurchase of the company's shares or the liquidation of the company. This last change will be applicable to income attributed as from 1 January 2018. Tax on stock exchange transactions Certain rates of the tax on stock exchange transactions ("SET") are increased as from 1 January 2018. More specifically, the (reduced) 0.09% rate is increased to 0.12% (applicable notably to public debt instruments, bonds, shares in (certain) investment companies and contractual investment funds) and the residual rate of 0.27% is increased to 0.35% (applicable notably to shares in ordinary companies, real estate certificates, etc.). Both (i) the higher rate of 1.32%, which is applicable to the repurchase of capitalisation shares by investment companies registered in Belgium with the FSMA, and (ii) the caps per transaction applicable in respect of all the rates remain unchanged. Furthermore, the following additional changes/clarifications were made to the scope of application of SET. These changes aim to solve existing discriminations between Belgian and foreign (EEA) UCIs (UCITs/AIFs). The Belgian legislator clarified the notion of UCI (organisme de placement collectif/instelling voor collectieve belegging) by referring to four categories: Belgian UCITS (public, institutional and private) and UCIs investing in receivables; Belgian AIFs (public, institutional and private); foreign UCITS/AIFs which are registered in Belgium with the FSMA because they offer their shares/units to the public in Belgium; and one new additional category: foreign UCITS/AIFs which are registered in a Member State of the European Economic Area but which are not registered in Belgium with the FSMA because they do not offer their shares/units to the public in Belgium. As a result of the first change, the Belgian legislator extended the scope of application of the reduced SET rate of 0.12% to shares/units in all UCIs as defined above (also including the foreign (EEA) UCIs forming the last category defined above, which were previously excluded from this reduced rate (and were subject to the ordinary 0.27% (now 0.35%) ordinary SET rate)). The Belgian legislator clarified that the 1.32% SET will not apply to the repurchase of own shares by an investment company belonging to the last category defined above. Hence, as this was already the case before, only the repurchase of own shares by an investment company (Belgian or foreign) which is registered in Belgium with the FSMA because it offers its shares to the public in Belgium will be subject to this 1.32% SET. 2 Clifford Chance January 2018

Lastly, the Belgian legislator clarified that the SET exemption for transactions on shares/units in institutional investment companies/funds also applies to foreign (EEA) investment companies/funds. Previously, it was not clear whether this exemption applied only to Belgian or also to foreign investment companies/funds. Clarification of the participation exemption rules applicable to participations in investment companies With regard to dividends distributed by real estate investment companies (e.g. SIR/GVV, FIIS/GVBF, etc.) the participation exemption regime (the dividendsreceived deduction, or "RDT/DBI") only applies for the portion of the dividends that originates from dividends and capital gains realised on shares of bona fide (i.e. fully taxable) companies. Moreover, it is required that the real estate investment company's articles of association provide for the annual distribution of 80% of its net income. The law now specifically provides that this condition will be met if the company complies with the 80% pay-out ratio which is applicable to it under its regulatory regime, which will make it easier for it to comply with this condition of distribution. Until now, a relative uncertainty existed as to whether, and to what extent, the tax exemption for capital gains on shares realised by Belgian tax resident companies applied in respect of shares in certain tax exempt investment companies. The law now clarifies that this exemption will be proportional to the percentage of the underlying income (dividends and capital gains) which can benefit from the RDT/DBI regime. In addition, the law and the preparatory works confirm that the minimum one year holding period and the minimum level of participation will not apply to shares held in investment companies. (Anticipated) changes to the private pricaf/pricaf privée tax and regulatory regime The enacted (and expected) changes to the Private Pricaf ('private pricaf'/'pricaf privée') tax and regulatory regime are also worth mentioning. The Private Pricaf is a tax exempt fund structure dedicated to private equity investments which is suitable for both individual and institutional investors. The Private Pricaf regime's success has been limited until now, notably due to a regulatory prohibition on the Private Pricaf taking controlling participations in target companies (subject to certain strict exceptions). Although this has not been voted yet, it is expected that this restriction should be released, together with some other changes aimed at increasing the flexibility of the vehicle. From a tax perspective, the voted tax reform already explicitly provides (similarly to the other investment companies see here above in this respect) that (i) the minimum participation thresholds (and the one-year minimum holding period) for the application of the RDT/DBI regime and capital gains tax exemption do not apply, whether at the level of the Private Pricaf or at the level of its shareholders, as the Private Pricaf qualifies as an 'investment company', and (ii) the tax exemption of capital gains realised on shares in the Private Pricaf will apply in a proportional way, based on the percentage of the underlying income which can benefit from the RDT/BDI regime. Please note that the capital gains on shares in a Private Pricaf continue to benefit from a specific favourable tax regime, i.e. a full (and not proportional) tax exemption provided that the Private Pricaf invests at least 90% of its assets in shares qualifying for the RDT/DBI regime and/or shares in other Private Pricafs (or January 2018 Clifford Chance 3

assimilated foreign vehicles) and not more than 10% in cash or other short term deposits. New interest deductibility limitation regime potentially applicable to certain investment companies Belgium introduced under the 2018-2020 tax reform package the various measures of the EU ATA Directives (I and II). Among these, there is a new limitation rule applicable to the tax deductibility of interest costs. Under this rule, net borrowing costs will only be tax deductible under certain limits, i.e. either EUR 3 million per year (calculated at group level in Belgium) or (ii) 30% of the corrected (taxable) EBITDA of the company, whichever is higher. Whereas the EU ATA Directive and the Belgian income tax code provide that this measure is not applicable to tax exempt/low taxed investment companies qualifying as UCITs or AIFs, it remains uncertain whether this exemption will also be applicable to Belgian SIR/GVVs and/or to the Belgian investment company in receivables ("SIC"/"VBS") (as neither of these vehicles qualifies as a UCIT or an AIF). This is a major concern for the Belgian SIRs/GVVs. Although this is considered to be a legislative flaw, a reparation law is still awaited New withholding tax exemption for Belgian and foreign dividends and decrease of the tax exemption of interest received on savings deposits for Belgian tax resident individuals To stimulate investment in shares, a new withholding tax exemption for Belgian tax resident individuals is introduced, which applies to Belgian and foreign dividends up to a threshold of EUR 627 per year (figure for 2018). This measure applies to all 'equity-based' instruments and therefore also parts bénéficiaires/winstbewijzen. Dividends distributed by UCIs or through FCP/GBF and legal structures (as defined under the Cayman tax, see below) are however excluded from this exemption. The taxpayer can choose the dividends to which the exemption applies and the exemption should be requested through the income tax return. Please note that a new planned legislative change will increase the EUR 627 threshold to EUR 800. As of 2018, Belgian tax resident individuals may only benefit from a tax exemption on the first EUR 940 of income they derive from savings deposits instead of the previous threshold of EUR 1,880. For savings accounts held in the name of a married couple (or a civil union), the exemption applies to twice this amount, i.e. EUR 1,880. Other new tax rules worth mentioning The 0.15% tax on securities accounts (applicable to individuals holding qualifying securities with a value of more than EUR 500,000 on one or more securities accounts) is in the process of being voted. It is relevant for the investment funds sector since the shares/units held in UCIs through a securities account will be subject to this tax, except for those acquired under a life insurance contract or a pension savings scheme. The Cayman tax has been amended so as to increase its effectiveness and close some existing loopholes, i.e. it will now also 4 Clifford Chance January 2018

apply (i) in case of double legal structures ('constructions juridiques'/'juridische constructies'), (ii) to legal structures which would be placed into a contractual arrangement (such as a life insurance product), and (iii) associations without legal personality (taxation in principle in the hands of its managers, etc.). The government also expressed its intention to make the Cayman tax applicable to 'private' investment companies ('fonds dédiés'/ 'geïndividualiseerde fondsen'). However, this measure has not yet been implemented. The rate of 'exit tax' which applies in the case of the registration/conversion of a company as/into a real estate investment company such as a SIR/GVV, FIIS/GVBF, etc. (as well as to certain reorganisation transactions involving such investment companies), will be reduced from 16.995% to 12.75% as from tax year 2019 and then increased again to 15% as from tax year 2021. Due probably to a legislative flaw, certain reorganisations with a SIR/GVV or a FIIS/GVBF carried out in 2018 would not be able to benefit from the 12.75% reduced exit tax rate but would still be subject to the 'old' 16.995% rate. Until now, the RDT/DBI regime was limited to 95% of the amount of the received dividends. This limitation now disappears so that 100% of the dividends may benefit from this regime. The 1.6995% reduced withholding tax rate (applicable to dividends distributed to certain foreign companies holding a participation of less than 10% in the capital of the Belgian distributing company but with an investment value of at least EUR 2.5 million) is abolished. It is replaced by a full withholding tax exemption, which would apply (similarly to the abolished reduced withholding tax rate) only if, and to the extent that, for the foreign beneficiary company, the Belgian withholding tax would not be creditable/refundable in its country of tax residence. This change is a logical consequence of the increase of the RDT/DBI regime mentioned above. January 2018 Clifford Chance 5

CONTACTS This publication does not necessarily deal with every important topic or cover every aspect of the topics with which it deals. It is not designed to provide legal or other advice. www.cliffordchance.com Clifford Chance, 10 Upper Bank Street, London, E14 5JJ Clifford Chance 2018 Clifford Chance LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales Alexandre Ooms Partner T +32 2533 5073 E alexandre.ooms @cliffordchance.com Pierre-Olivier van Caubergh Senior Associate T +32 2533 5910 E pierreolivier.vancaubergh @cliffordchance.com Thomas Linard de Guertechin Associate T +32 2533 5909 E thomas. linarddeguertechin @cliffordchance.com under number OC323571 Registered office: 10 Upper Bank Street, London, E14 5JJ We use the word 'partner' to refer to a member of Clifford Chance LLP, or an employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications If you do not wish to receive further information from Clifford Chance about events or legal developments which we believe may be of interest to you, please either send an email to nomorecontact@cliffordchance.com or by post at Clifford Chance LLP, 10 Upper Bank Street, Canary Wharf, London E14 5JJ Abu Dhabi Amsterdam Bangkok Barcelona Beijing Brussels Bucharest Casablanca Dubai Düsseldorf Frankfurt Hong Kong Istanbul London Luxembourg Madrid Milan Moscow Munich New York Paris Perth Prague Rome São Paulo Seoul Shanghai Singapore Sydney Tokyo Warsaw Washington, D.C. Clifford Chance has a co-operation agreement with Abuhimed Alsheikh Alhagbani Law Firm in Riyadh. Clifford Chance has a best friends relationship with Redcliffe Partners in Ukraine. 6 Clifford Chance January 2018