The Economic value Of the Johnson County Community College

Similar documents
executive summary Demonstrating the Economic Value of Delaware Technical Community College Delaware Technical Community

executive summary Demonstrating the Value of Central Community College Central Community College

executive summary Demonstrating the Value of Mitchell Community College Mitchell Community College

The economic Value. Of Aims Community College

The economic Value. Of Coast Community College District

Demonstrating the Value of John Tyler Community College executive summary 1

The economic Value. Of Aaniiih Nakoda College

2014 Economic Impact Study executive summary and factsheets

The economic Value. Of San Bernardino Community College District

The ECONOMIC VALUE of the UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO. Executive Summary. Analysis of the Economic Impact & Return on Investment of Education

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Analysis of the Economic Impact and Return on Investment of Education. April 2018

Analysis of the Economic Impact and Return on Investment of Education. September 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY: Northern Virginia Community College

The economic Value. Of Owens Community College

executive summary Demonstrating the Value of

Analysis of the Return on Investment and Economic Impact of Education OZARKS TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE. August 2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Analysis of the Economic Impact and Return on Investment of Education. April 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Demonstrating the Value of the Ontario college sector

Analysis of the Economic Impact and Return on Investment of Education. August 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

DECEMBER The Economic Value of the University of Louisiana System EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Economic Contribution of

Economic Contribution of

Economic Contribution of

Economic Contribution of

Economic Contribution

Economic Contribution of

DEMONSTRATING THE VALUE OF

DEMONSTRATING THE VALUE OF

The Economic Value of San Diego & Imperial Counties Community Colleges Association

The ECONOMIC VALUE of the UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO. Main Report. Analysis of the Economic Impact & Return on Investment of Education

The Economic Value of Harrisburg Area Community College September 2015

MAIN REPORT. The Economic Value of Northern Colorado Public Colleges and Universities. August 2017

Economic Contribution of Ozarks Technical Community College

Analysis of the Economic Impact of Education and Return on Investment BERGEN COMMUNITY COLLEGE. March 2017 MAIN REPORT

Demonstrating the Value of San Diego Community College District

Main Report. Economic Contribution of Grayson County College. Analysis of Investment Effectiveness and Economic Growth.

Analysis of Investment Effectiveness and Economic Growth. Executive Summary. Prepared by: M. Henry Robison, PhD and Kjell A. Christophersen, PhD

Economic Contribution of Clatsop Community College

SANTA ANA COLLEGE THE ECONOMIC VALUE OF. July 2018 ANALYSIS OF THE ECONOMIC IMPACT AND RETURN ON INVESTMENT OF EDUCATION

Moving Texas Forward: The Economic Contribution of Texas Community Colleges

The Economic Contribution of Rhodes State College

Community College. Analysis of the Return on Investment and Economic Impact of Education BROOKDALE COMMUNITY COLLEGE. September 2016 MAIN REPORT

SANTIAGO CANYON COLLEGE

Broward College. Economic Impact. Analysis of Investment Effectiveness & Economic Growth MAIN REPORT. Report prepared by.

Main Report. Economic Contribution of State College of Florida, Manatee-Sarasota. Analysis of Investment Effectiveness and Economic Growth.

Main Report. Economic Contribution of Aims Community College. Analysis of Investment Effectiveness and Economic Growth.

College of Central Florida

Main Report. Economic Contribution of Grand Rapids Community College. Analysis of Investment Effectiveness and Economic Growth.

Main Report. Economic Contribution of Dallas County Community College District. Analysis of Investment Effectiveness and Economic Growth

Economic Contribution

Main Report. Economic Contribution of Rock Valley College. Analysis of Investment Effectiveness and Economic Growth. June 2013

Economic Contribution of Central Oregon Community College

The Economic Value of American Indian and Alaska Native Tribal Colleges & Universities

Economic Contribution of the Florida College System

Economic Contribution of Texas Gulf Coast Consortium of Community Colleges

Main Report. Economic Contribution of Southwestern Oregon Community College. Analysis of Investment Effectiveness and Economic Growth.

Economic Contribution of Chabot-Las Positas Community College District

Main Report. Economic Contribution of North Idaho College. Analysis of Investment Effectiveness and Economic Growth. August 2012

The Economic Value of San Bernardino Community College District MAIN REPORT

Volume 1: Main Report

FEBRUARY The Economic Value of Texas Woman's University MAIN REPORT

Volume 1: Main Report

North w e s t Mis s ou ri Sta te Un ive rs ity

Volume 1: Main Report

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Green County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Morgan County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Lawrence County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Lyon County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Hancock County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Boone County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Woodford County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Caldwell County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Jefferson County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Hardin County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Estill County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Analysis of Yolo County Workforce Investment Board

Contributions and Impact of Coconino County Accommodation School District #99. The Arizona Rural Policy Institute

Economic Contribution of the Colorado Community College System

Appendix 1: Glossary of Terms

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Daviess County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Volume 2: Detailed Results

Volume 1: Main Report

Volume 1: Main Report

TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE. Independent Auditor's Report 1-2. Management's Discussion and Analysis Basic Financial Statements

Itasca County Wellness Court Evaluation

All new non-faculty employees have a mandatory New Staff Orientation that they must attend. If you haven t already scheduled this session please call

Gov. Rec. FY Agency Req. FY 2018

The Economic Impact of Flagstaff Unified

Economy Overview Champaign-Urbana, IL

Ahmad Borazan, PhD Qin Fan, PhD

Economy Overview Champaign County, IL

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF FEARRINGTON PLACE


Country: Serbia. Initiation Plan. Development of Youth Employment Bond

Summer Youth Employment Program Impact Analysis. Kansas

Economic Impact Of Ohio Aerospace Institute, FY

INVESTING IN YOURSELF

White Pine County Economic Overview

Social costs tend to persist over a person s lifetime while most tangible costs are one-off

The Economic Impact of Housing Organisations on the North: Wakefield and District Housing

Transcription:

The Economic value Of the Johnson County Community College August 2015 Analysis of the Economic Impact & Return on Investment of Education Johnson County Community College (JCCC) creates value in many ways. The college plays a key role in helping students increase their employability and achieve their individual potential. It provides students with the skills they need to have a fulfilling and prosperous career. Further, it supplies an environment for students to meet new people, increase their self-confidence, and promote their overall health and wellbeing. The value of JCCC influences both the lives of students and also the county economy. The college serves a range of industries in Johnson County and supports local businesses, and society as a whole in Kansas benefits from an expanded economy and improved quality of life. The benefits created by JCCC even extend to the state and local government through increased tax revenues and public sector savings. The purpose of this study is to investigate the economic impacts created by JCCC on the business community and the benefits that the college generates in return for the investments made by its key stakeholder groups students, society, and taxpayers. The following two analyses are presented: county economic impact analysis Investment analysis All results reflect student and financial data for Fiscal Year (FY) 2013-14. Impacts on the business community are reported under the economic impact analysis, and the return on investment to students, society, and taxpayers are reported under the investment analysis. Both analyses are described more fully in the following sections. DEMONSTRATING THE VALUE OF JOHNSON COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

economic impact analysis JCCC promotes economic growth in Johnson County in a variety of ways. The college is an employer and buyer of goods and services, and the living expenses of students from outside of Johnson County benefit local businesses. In addition, JCCC is a primary source of education to Johnson County residents and a supplier of trained workers to Johnson County industry. The county economic impact analysis examines the impact of JCCC on the local business community through increased consumer spending and enhanced business productivity. Results are measured in terms of added income and are organized according to the following impacts: 1. Impact of college operations; 2. Impact of the spending of students who relocated to the county, and; 3. Impact of the increased productivity of alumni that were employed in the county workforce during the analysis year. Operations Spending Impact JCCC is an important employer in Johnson County. In FY 2013-14, the college employed 2,476 full-time and part-time faculty and staff. Of these, 71% lived in Johnson County. Total payroll at JCCC was $121.4 million, much of which was spent in the county for groceries, rent, eating out, clothing, and other household expenses. JCCC is itself a large-scale buyer of goods and services. In FY 2013-14 the college spent $59.3 million to cover its expenses for facilities, professional services, and supplies. The total income that JCCC created during the analysis year as a result of its day-to-day operations was $137.5 million. This figure represents the college s payroll, the multiplier effects generated by the spending of the college and its employees, and a downward adjustment to account for funding that the college received from local sources. DEMONSTRATING THE VALUE OF JOHNSON COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2

Job equivalents based on income Job equivalents represent full- and part-time jobs that would not have occurred in the county without the college. They are calculated by jobs to sales ratios specific to each industry. Based on the added income created by JCCC, the job equivalents are as follows: Operations spending impact = 2,614 job equivalents Impact of student spending = 30 job equivalents Alumni impact = 11,498 job equivalents Overall, the added income created by JCCC and its students supported 14,142 job equivalents. Impact of Student Spending Around 24% of students attending JCCC originated from outside the county in FY 2013-14. Some of these students relocated to Johnson County. These students likely would not have come to the county if the college did not exist. While attending, out-ofcounty students spent $5.5 million to purchase groceries, rent accommodation, pay for transportation, and so on. A significant portion of these expenditures occurred in the county, generating $1.1 million in new income in the economy during the analysis year. Alumni Impact Income created by JCCC in FY 2013-14 (Added income) $137.5 million Operations spending impact $1.1 million Impact of student spending $594.1 million Alumni impact $732.7 million Total impact JCCC s biggest impact results from the education and training it provides for local residents. Since the college was established, students have studied at JCCC and entered the workforce with new skills. Today, thousands of former students are employed in Johnson County. During the analysis year, former students of JCCC generated $594.1 million in added income in the county. This figure represents the higher wages that students earned during the year, the increased output of the businesses that employed the students, and the multiplier effects that occurred as students and their employers spent money at other businesses. Total Impact The overall impact of JCCC on the local business community during the analysis year amounted to $732.7 million, equal to the sum of the operations spending impact, the student spending impact, and the alumni impact. This added income was equal to approximately 1.9% of the county s Gross Regional Product. DEMONSTRATING THE VALUE OF JOHNSON COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3

Investment analysis Investment analysis is the process of evaluating total costs and measuring these against total benefits to determine whether or not a proposed venture will be profitable. If benefits outweigh costs, then the investment is worthwhile. If costs outweigh benefits, then the investment will lose money and is considered unprofitable. This study considers JCCC as an investment from the perspectives of students, society, and taxpayers. The backdrop for the analysis is the entire Kansas economy. Student perspective In 2013-14, JCCC served 29,770 credit students and 16,919 non-credit students. In order to attend college, students paid for tuition, fees, books, and supplies. They also gave up money that they would have otherwise earned had they been working instead of attending college. The total investment made by JCCC s students in FY 2013-14 amounted to $232.3 million, equal to $50.1 million in out-of-pocket expenses plus $182.2 million in forgone time and money. In return for their investment, JCCC s students will receive a stream of higher future wages that will continue to grow through their working lives. As shown in Figure 1, mean income levels at the 16+25+34+48 midpoint of the average-aged worker s career increase as people achieve higher levels of education. For example, the average associate s degree completer from JCCC will see an increase in earnings of $5,600 each year compared to someone with a high school diploma or equivalent. Over a working lifetime, this increase in earnings amounts to an undiscounted value of approximately $235,200 in higher income. Figure 1. Annual income by education level at career midpoint in Johnson County $62,800 $39,900 $34,300 $21,900 <HS HS Associate s Bachelor s Source: EMSI complete employment data. DEMONSTRATING THE VALUE OF JOHNSON COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4

The present value of the higher future wages that JCCC s students will receive over their working careers is $726.8 million. Dividing this value by the $232.3 million in student costs yields a benefitcost ratio of 3.1. In other words, for every $1 students invest in JCCC in the form of out-of-pocket expenses and forgone time and money, they receive a cumulative of $3.10 in higher future wages. The average annual rate of return for students is 13.4%. This is an impressive return compared, for example, to the less than 1% return per annum that is generally expected from saving money in today s standard bank savings accounts. Social perspective Society as a whole within Kansas benefits from the presence of JCCC in two major ways. The first and largest benefit that society receives is the added income created in the state. As discussed in the previous section, students earn more because of the skills they acquire while attending JCCC. Businesses also earn more because the enhanced skills of students make them more productive. Together, higher student wages and increased business output stimulate increases in income across the state, thereby raising prosperity in Kansas and expanding the economic base for society as a whole. Figure 2. Present value of added income and social savings in Kansas Social savings 7+93 $80.1 million Added income $2.9 billion Benefits to society also consist of the savings generated by the improved lifestyles of students. Education is statistically correlated with a variety of lifestyle changes that generate social savings across three main categories: 1) health, 2) crime, and 3) unemployment. Health savings include avoided medical costs associated with smoking, alcoholism, obesity, drug abuse, and mental disorders. Crime savings include reduced security expenditure and insurance administration, lower victim costs, and reduced criminal justice system expenditures. Unemployment savings include the reduced demand for income assistance and welfare benefits. For a list of study references to these statistical benefits, please contact the college for a copy of the main report. Figure 2 shows the present value of the added income and social savings that will occur in Kansas over the working lifetime of the 2013-14 student population at JCCC. Added income amounts to a present value of $2.9 billion due to the increased lifetime incomes of students and associated increases in business output. Social savings amount to $80.1 million, the sum of health, crime, and unemployment savings in Kansas. Altogether, total benefits to society equal $3 billion (in present value terms). DEMONSTRATING THE VALUE OF JOHNSON COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5

Society invested $378.5 million in JCCC educations during the analysis year. This includes all expenditures by JCCC, all student expenditures, and all student opportunity costs. For every dollar of this investment, society as a whole in Kansas will receive a cumulative value of $7.80 in benefits, equal to the $3 billion in benefits divided by the $378.5 million in costs. These benefits will occur for as long as JCCC s 2013-14 students remain employed in the state workforce. Taxpayer perspective From the taxpayer perspective, benefits consist primarily of the taxes that state and local government will collect from the added income created in the state. As JCCC students earn more, they will make higher tax payments. Employers will also make higher tax payments as they increase their output and purchase more supplies and services. By the end of the students working careers, state and local government will have collected a present value of $278.4 million in added taxes. A portion of the savings enjoyed by society also accrues to state and local taxpayers. Students are more employable, so the demand for welfare and unemployment benefits reduces. Improved health habits lower the students demand for national health care services. Students are also less likely to commit crimes, so the demand for law enforcement services reduces (study references are available in the main report). All of these benefits will generate a present value of $21.9 million in savings to state and local taxpayers. Total benefits to taxpayers equal $300.2 million, equal to the sum of the added taxes and public sector savings. Comparing this to the taxpayer costs of $113.1 million equal to the funding that JCCC received from state and local government during the analysis year yields a benefit-cost ratio of 2.7. This means that for every $1 of public money invested in JCCC, taxpayers receive a cumulative value of $2.70 over the course of the students working lives. The average annual rate of return is 7.7%, a solid investment that compares favorably with other long-term investments in both the private and public sectors. DEMONSTRATING THE VALUE OF JOHNSON COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6

Table 2. Summary of investment analysis results Student Perspective $726,835 Benefits (thousands) $232,311 Costs (thousands) $494,524 Net present value (thousands) 3.1 Benefit-cost ratio Summary of investment analysis results Table 2 presents the results of the investment analysis for all three of JCCC s major stakeholder groups students, society, and taxpayers. As shown, students receive great value for their educational investment. At the same time, the investment made by state and local taxpayers in the college creates a wide range of benefits to society and returns more to government budgets than it costs. 13.4% Rate of return Social Perspective $2,961,034 Benefits (thousands) $378,517 Costs (thousands) $2,582,517 Net present value (thousands) 7.8 Benefit-cost ratio NA Rate of return* Taxpayer Perspective $300,228 Benefits (thousands) $113,051 Costs (thousands) $187,177 Net present value (thousands) 2.7 Benefit-cost ratio 7.7% Rate of return * The rate of return is not reported for the social perspective because the beneficiaries of the investment are not necessarily the same as the original investors. DEMONSTRATING THE VALUE OF JOHNSON COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7

conclusion The results of this study demonstrate that JCCC creates value from multiple perspectives. The college benefits local businesses by increasing consumer spending in the county and supplying a steady flow of qualified, trained workers into the workforce. It enriches the lives of students by raising their lifetime incomes and helping them achieve their individual potential. It benefits society as a whole in Kansas by creating a more prosperous economy and generating a variety of savings through the improved lifestyles of students. Finally, it benefits state and local taxpayers through increased tax receipts across the state and a reduced demand for government-supported social services. About the Study Data and assumptions used in the study are based on several sources, including the 2013-14 academic and financial reports from the college, industry and employment data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and U.S. Census Bureau, outputs of EMSI s Social Accounting Matrix (SAM) model, and a variety of studies and surveys relating education to social behavior. The study applies a conservative methodology and follows standard practice using only the most recognized indicators of investment effectiveness and economic impact. For a full description of the data and approach used in the study, please contact the college for a copy of the technical report. About EMSI Economic Modeling Specialists International, a CareerBuilder company, is a leading provider of economic impact studies and labor market data to educational institutions, workforce planners, and regional developers in the U.S. and internationally. Since 2000, EMSI has completed over 1,200 economic impact studies for educational institutions in four countries. Visit www. economicmodeling.com for more information about EMSI s products and services. DEMONSTRATING THE VALUE OF JOHNSON COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8