Tunisia. Total MAP Caseload. Average time needed to close MAP cases (in months) n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

Similar documents
New Zealand. Total MAP Caseload. Average time needed to close MAP cases (in months) n.a. n.a

Greece. Total MAP Caseload. Average time needed to close MAP cases (in months) n.a. n.a

Japan. Total MAP Caseload. Average time needed to close MAP cases (in months)

Pakistan. Total MAP Caseload. Average time needed to close MAP cases (in months) n.a. n.a n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

Italy end inventory 100. Milestone 1 to End. Start to Milestone

Switzerland. Total MAP Caseload. Average time needed to close MAP cases (in months)

Switzerland Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 1 September 2016) General Information

Switzerland Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 24 August 2018)

MUTUAL AGREEMENT PROCEDURE PROGRAM REPORT

Maldives Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 29 November 2018) General Information

Paraguay Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 27 June 2017)

ANNEX II CHANGES TO THE UN MODEL DERIVING FROM THE REPORT ON BEPS ACTION PLAN 14

Kenya Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 15 February 2018) General Information

Thailand Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 18 September 2017) General Information

Georgia Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 16 December 2016)

Egypt Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 16 October 2018) General Information

Thailand Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 12 June 2018) General Information

Slovenia Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 01 May 2018) General Information

Korea Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 02 April 2018) General Information

Macau (China) Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 29 June 2017) General Information

Mutual agreement procedure based on Swiss double taxation agreements

United Kingdom/United States Dual Consolidated Loss Competent. Authority Agreement CONVENTION BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF

Republic of Korea Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 30 August 2017) General Information

The Independent State of Papua New Guinea Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: )

Mauritius Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 19 April 2017) General Information

St. Kitts and Nevis Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 09 May 2018) General Information

Photo credits: Cover Rawpixel.com - Shutterstock.com

Factsheet on the mutual agreement procedure May 2018

Bulgaria Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 16 December 2016)

Photo credits: Cover Rawpixel.com - Shutterstock.com

Guide for mutual agreement procedure pursuant to tax treaties (MAP) Contents

OECD releases France peer review report on implementation of Action 14 Minimum Standards

What is Transfer Pricing and Why is it Important?

Saudi Arabia Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 25 January 2017)

Making Dispute Resolution More Effective MAP Peer Review Report, Canada (Stage 1)

OECD releases Italy peer review report on implementation of Action 14 Minimum Standards

Foreign tax credit A Practical insight

OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project. Making Dispute Resolution More Effective MAP Peer Review Report, Spain (Stage 1)

SP1/11 Transfer pricing, mutual agreement procedure and arbitration

Double Taxation Relief

Argentina Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 1 September 2016) General Information

OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations

Curaçao (submitted by the Kingdom of the Netherlands on behalf of Curaçao)

Austria Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 31 October 2017) General Information

EUJOINTTRANSFERPRICINGFORUM PROCEDURAL IMPROVEMENTS TO THE ARBITRATION CONVENTION AND RELATED MUTUALAGREEMENT PROCEDURES

Guidance for Taxpayers on the Mutual Agreement Procedure (Q&A)

NOTE ON DISPUTE RESOLUTION: PROPOSED NEW ARTICLE 25 COMMENTARY

Transfer Pricing Country Summary United Kingdom

Article 23 A and 23 B of the UN Model Conflicts of qualification and interpretation

TAX TREATMENT OF DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS

BEPS Action 14: Make Dispute Resolution Mechanisms More Effective

Norway Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 30 September 2017) General Information

EU Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive 2: hybrid mismatches with third countries

Global Transfer Pricing Review kpmg.com/gtps

Brazil Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 13 February 2019) General Information

Overview. Preserving domestic law restrictions on the deduction of rent or royalties. Introduction

SECTION 5. SMALL CASE PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING COMPETENT AUTHORITY ASSISTANCE.01 General.02 Small Case Standards.03 Small Case Filing Procedure

OECD releases the United Kingdom peer review report on implementation of Action 14 minimum standards

Revenue Arrangements for Implementing EU and OECD Exchange of Information Requirements In Respect of Tax Rulings

CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS

Dispute Resolution: the Mutual Agreement Procedure

Facts of the case. Facts of the case METERS GROUP. DISPUTE AVOIDANCE AND RESOLUTION Case example: MAP

Denmark Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 20 June 2017) General Information

EU JOINT TRANSFER PRICING FORUM

ROMANIA. minimum of 25% of the number/value of shares or voting rights in the two entities.

Bilateral Advance Pricing Agreement Guidelines

Competent Authority Services Division International and Large Business Directorate Compliance Programs Branch Canada Revenue Agency

The Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands. And. The Government of the Isle of Man

Increased taxpayer rights for tax dispute resolution under new EU Directive

BIAC Comments on the. OECD Public Discussion Draft: Draft Comments of the 2008 Update to the OECD Model Convention

The Liège Court of First Instance in Belgium has

Chapter 2. Dispute Channels. 1. Overview of common dispute process

Competent Authority Services Division International and Large Business Directorate Compliance Programs Branch Canada Revenue Agency

2017 UPDATE TO THE OECD MODEL TAX CONVENTION. 2 November 7

SOME RELEVANT TREATY ISSUES

Tax Management International Forum

Germany. Transfer Pricing Country Profile. Updated October The Arm s Length Principle

Release of BEPS discussion draft: Make Dispute Resolution Mechanisms More Effective

Canada. Transfer Pricing Country Profile. Updated October The Arm s Length Principle

National Tax Agency, Japan

ALI-ABA Course of Study International Trust and Estate Planning July 31 - August 1, 2008 Santa Fe, New Mexico

E/C.18/2016/CRP.2 Attachment 9

THE 2008 UPDATE TO THE OECD MODEL TAX CONVENTION 18 July 2008

OECD Mrs Marlies de Ruiter 2, rue André Pascal Paris Cedex 16 Frankreich. Düsseldorf, 16 th January 2015

Assistance in the Collection of Taxes (Article 27) and its Commentary. Article 27 ASSISTANCE IN THE COLLECTION OF TAXES 1

QUESTIONNAIRE ON THE TREATMENT OF INTEREST PAYMENTS AND RELATED TAX BASE EROSION ISSUES

P ractitioners. Corner. Multinational enterprises doing business in. Italy s International Tax Ruling Procedure. by Marco Rossi

SEC. 5. SMALL CASE PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING COMPETENT AUTHORITY ASSISTANCE.01 General.02 Small Case Standards.03 Small Case Filing Procedure

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Session Report: US Model Treaty 2015 Proposals

OECD releases Switzerland s peer review report on implementation of BEPS Action 14 minimum standards

Competent Authority Resolutions and APAs

Why Change Social Service Funding? What Are Counties Paying For Now? Why Isn t it Equitable? What Was Proposed? What Was Passed? How Will it Work in

Australia. Transfer Pricing Country Profile. Updated February The Arm s Length Principle

International Taxation in Nepal

EU JOINT TRANSFER PRICING FORUM

Overview of Practical Portfolio

Luxembourg Tax Alert OECD BEPS Multilateral Convention: Luxembourg s choices published

24 NOVEMBER 2009 TO 21 JANUARY 2010

I. Japanese CFC Rules and the 2010 tax reforms

Transcription:

Tunisia 5 4 Total MAP Caseload Cases started before 1 January 2017 Transfer pricing cases Other cases 2017 start inventory Cases started Cases closed 2017 end inventory 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 3 3 2 1 Cases started as from 1 January 2017 2017 start inventory Cases started Cases closed 2017 end inventory 0 Start inventory on 01.01.2017 Cases started Cases closed End inventory on 31.12.2017 Transfer pricing cases Other cases 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cases started as from 1 January 2017 Cases started before 1 January 2017 Average time needed to close MAP cases (in months) Cases started before 1 January 2017 Transfer pricing cases Other cases Average time n.a. n.a. Cases started as from 1 January 2017 Transfer pricing cases Other cases Start to End Receipt to Start Start to Milestone 1 Milestone 1 to End n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. Tunisia - 2017 MAP Statistics Page 1/8

MAP Outcomes Cases closed by outcome denied MAP access objection is not justified withdrawn by taxpayer unilateral relief granted resolved via domestic remedy fully double taxation / fully resolving partially double taxation / partially resolving that there is no no including to disagree any other outcome Total Transfer pricing cases (all) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cases started before 1 January 2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cases started as from 1 January 2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other cases (all) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cases started before 1 January 2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cases started as from 1 January 2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 All cases 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tunisia - 2017 MAP Statistics Page 2/8

Annex A MAP Statistics Reporting for the 2017 Reporting Period (1 January 2017 to 31 December 2017) for Pre-2017 Cases Tunisia Row 1 category of cases no. of pre-2017 cases in MAP inventory on 1 January 2017 denied MAP access objection is not justified withdrawn by taxpayer number of pre-2017 cases closed during the reporting period by outcome: unilateral relief granted resolved via domestic remedy fully double taxation / fully resolving partially double taxation / partially resolving that there is no taxation not in no including to disagree any other outcome Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Column 5 Column 6 Column 7 Column 8 Column 9 Column 10 Column 11 Column 12 Column 13 Column 14 Attribution/ Allocation 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 n.a. Row 2 Others 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 n.a. Row 3 Total 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 n.a. 1) a MAP case was considered as such when a taxpayer submits a request to challenge the taxation paid in Tunisia or a contracting state and that Tunisia considers such taxation is not levied in with the entered into or when the competent authority of a contracting state contacts Tunisia for a case where taxation is not in. 2) Tunisia has followed the same definition of MAP cass as the one existing in the MAP statistics reporting framework 3) Tunisia has adopted the same categorisation of MAP cases, whereby attribution/allocation MAP cases are cases falling under article 7 of the OECD Model Tax Convention (Profit allocation to permanent establishments) or Article 9 (associated enterprises). 4) no pre-2017 cases were closed in 2017. 5) the cases reported here are either being under analysis or dealt with by the administration in charge of the reimbursement, and at this stage no notification was sent to the taxpayer. no. of pre- 2017 cases remaining in on MAP inventory on 31 December 2017 average time taken (in months) for closing pre- 2017 cases during the reporting period Tunisia - 2017 MAP Statistics Page 3/8

Table 1: Attribution / Allocation MAP Cases number of post-2016 cases closed during the reporting period by outcome: Treaty Partner 2016 cases in MAP inventory on 1 January 2017 2016 cases started during the reporting period denied MAP access objection is not justified withdrawn by taxpayer unilateral relief granted resolved via domestic remedy fully double taxation eliminated / fully resolving partially double taxation / partially resolving taxation not in that there is no no including to disagree any other outcome 2016 cases remaining in MAP inventory on 31 December 2017 Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Column 5 Column 6 Column 7 Column 8 Column 9 Column 10 Column 11 Column 12 Column 13 Column 14 Row 2 Treaty Partners (de minimis rule applies) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Row 3 Treaty Partners (Others) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notes Tunisia - 2017 MAP Statistics Page 4/8

denied MAP access objection is not justified withdrawn by taxpayer unilateral relief granted resolved via domestic remedy fully double taxation / fully resolving partially double taxation / partially resolving taxation not in that there is no taxation not in no including to disagree Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Column 5 Column 6 Column 7 Column 8 Column 9 Column 10 Column 11 Column 12 Column 13 Column 14 Row 2 Treaty Partners (de minimis rule applies) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Row 3 Treaty Partners (Others) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Treaty Partner 2016 cases in MAP inventory on 1 January 2017 2016 cases started during the reporting period Table 2: Other MAP Cases number of post-2016 cases closed during the reporting period by outcome any other outcome 2016 cases remaining in MAP inventory on 31 December 2017 Tunisia - 2017 MAP Statistics Page 5/8

Table 1: Attribution / Allocation MAP Cases Row 2 Row 3 "Start" to "End" Receipt of taxpayer's MAP request to "Start" "Start" to Milestone 1 Milestone 1 to "End" Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Column 5 Treaty Partners (de minimis rule applies) Treaty Partners (Others) Treaty Partner average time taken (in months) for post-2016 cases from: Total Average Time n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. Tunisia - 2017 MAP Statistics Page 6/8

Table 2: Other MAP Cases Row 2 Row 3 Treaty Partners (de minimis rule applies) Treaty Partners (Others) "Start" to "End" Receipt of taxpayer's MAP request to "Start" "Start" to Milestone 1 Milestone 1 to "End" Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Column 5 Total Average Time n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. Treaty Partner average time taken (in months) for post-2016 cases from: Tunisia - 2017 MAP Statistics Page 7/8

"Start" to "End" Receipt of taxpayer's MAP request to "Start" "Start" to Milestone 1 Milestone 1 to "End" Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Row 1 Total Average Time n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. Table 3: All MAP Cases average time taken (in months) for post-2016 cases from: Tunisia - 2017 MAP Statistics Page 8/8