OHIO MPO & LARGE CITY CAPITAL PROGRAM SFY 2017 SUMMARY

Similar documents
OHIO MPO AND LARGE CITY CAPITAL PROGRAM SFY 2015 SUMMARY

Technical Memorandum. Finance. Prepared for: Prepared by: In cooperation with: High Street Consulting Group

A Moment of Truth: Ohio s Transportation Funding Problem, and How to Solve It. Better Transportation for Working and Living

INVESTING STRATEGICALLY

2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION

2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION

Transportation Trust Fund Overview

ROCHESTER - OLMSTED COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS MEMORANDUM

Financial Snapshot October 2014

INTRODUCTION. 1 ORGANIZATIONAL CHART...

ALL Counties. ALL Districts

2040 Long Range Transportation Plan. Financial Summary

Financial. Snapshot An appendix to the Citizen s Guide to Transportation Funding in Missouri

Chapter 5: Cost and Revenues Assumptions

INVESTMENT STRATEGIES

Chapter 15. Transportation Improvements Financing. Ohio Kentucky Indiana Regional Council of Governments Regional Transportation Plan

FEDERAL FUNDING SOURCES

House Bill 20 Implementation. House Select Committee on Transportation Planning Tuesday, August 30, 2016, 1:00 P.M. Capitol Extension E2.

Transportation Coordinating Committee Friday, March 8, :30 A.M. Springview Government Center 3130 East Main Street Room 151, 1 st Floor AGENDA

Chapter 6: Financial Resources

Contents. Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization. Introduction S. St. Mary s Street San Antonio, Texas 78205

WASATCH FRONT REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN FINANCIAL PLAN. Technical Report 47 May 2007 DAVIS MORGAN SALT LAKE TOOELE WEBER

10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan DRAFT

QUALITY TRANSPORTATION SUMMARY

RIDOA STATEWIDE PLANNING PROGRAM Transportation Planning

N A D O N A D O R E S E A R C H F O U N D AT I O N R P O A M E R I C A

Redbook. Department of Transportation

A Hannah News Service Publication. Population and Employment in Ohio s Metropolitan Areas

NASHVILLE AREA MPO TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY

CHAPTER 5 INVESTMENT PLAN

Amendment 6 - OKI 2030 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN

PENNSYLVANIA S 2017 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM FINANCIAL GUIDANCE

Concord Township Cincinnati, City of Macedonia, City of... 9 Middleport, Village of Dayton, City of... 11

Chapter 3: Regional Transportation Finance

FY Statewide Capital Investment Strategy... asset management, performance-based strategic direction

FY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

State Issue 3 Grants a monopoly for the commercial production and sale of marijuana County Variance Sorted Alphabetically By County

Fiscal Year VDOT Annual Budget June 2017

Technical Appendix. FDOT 2040 Revenue Forecast

In addition to embarking on a new dialogue on Ohio s transportation priorities,

SKATS FY 2018-FY 2023

Safety Target Meeting Summary 10/3/2017

Prioritization and Programming Process. NCDOT Division of Planning and Programming November 16, 2016

Transportation Improvement Program and Incentives for Local Planning

FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Recommendations for On the Move Plan Elements -- DRAFT MAY 23 Funding Goal Group June 22, 2006 Page 1

GLOSSARY. At-Grade Crossing: Intersection of two roadways or a highway and a railroad at the same grade.

Pioneer Valley Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Proposed Amendments January 2017

P.L.2016, CHAPTER 56, approved October 14, 2016 Assembly, No. 10 (Fourth Reprint)

APPENDIX I REVENUE PROJECTION AND ASSUMPTIONS

2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION

FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

State Infrastructure Bank Annual Financial Report

FY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

CHAPTER 4 1 Transportation Financial Analysis

A Hannah News Service Publication. Population and Employment in Ohio s Metropolitan Areas

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Technical Report No. 4. Revenue and Costs

Employment Situation: Ohio and U.S. (Seasonally Adjusted) 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 -5,000. In This Issue

Review and Update of Year 2035 Regional Transportation Plan

APPENDIX 5 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

Appendix. G RTP Revenue Assumptions REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY

City Engineers Association of Minnesota Annual Conference January 31, 2013

Employment Situation: Ohio and U.S. (Seasonally Adjusted) 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000. In This Issue

Regional Equity Analysis Of Current Funding (Highway STIP and CIP) Project Selection Advisory (PSA) Council

State Infrastructure Bank Annual Financial Report

Corridors of Commerce DRAFT Scoring and Prioritization Process. Patrick Weidemann Director of Capital Planning and Programming November 1, 2017

BINGHAMTON METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION STUDY CERTIFICATION NARRATIVE FY 2016

1 (b) Reconstruct and rehabilitate state highways to better maintain 2 them and prevent and avoid costly future repairs; 3 (c) Support local

Draft. Amendment FY Unified Planning Work Program

Danny Straessle Public Information Officer ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT

10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan DRAFT

APPENDIX FOR THE METROPOLITAN LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN Forecast of State and Federal Revenues for Statewide and Metropolitan Plans

MADISON ATHENS-CLARKE OCONEE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION STUDY UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM FY

Transportation Planning

Pennsylvania Department of Transportation s Statewide Procedures for STIP and TIP Revisions

Financial Capacity Analysis

CRTPO Project Selection Direct Attributable & Bonus Allocation Funds

Analysis of the Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan Prepared by Alameda County Transportation Commission

Fiscal Year VDOT Annual Budget June 2018

PROGRAM FINANCING FUNDING

Transportation Package HB 2017

Summary Narrative of Amendment 3 to the FFY Transportation Improvement Program for the Northern Middlesex Region

FY Unified Planning Work Program. FY 2017 Unified Planning Work Program

Wednesday, June 6, 2018

Terre Haute Seelyville West Terre Haute Vigo County. Brazil Harmony Knightsville Clay County

Public Works and Development Services

Chapter 4: Regional Transportation Finance

UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM

Fiscal Year Revised VDOT Annual Budget November 2014

Estimated Financial Summary for the Highway and Bridge Construction Schedule

NASHVILLE AREA MPO. ADJUSTMENT to The Fiscal Years Transportation Improvement Program. Adjustment Number: TIP Number:

SFY 2018 (July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018) Annual Report

Funding Update. House Transportation Subcommittee on Long-Term Infrastructure Planning September 10, 2015, 9:00 A.M. Capitol Extension E2.

STATE INFRASTRUCTURE BANK ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT

Congestion Management Process. Prepared by: Ghyabi & Associates, Inc.

7.0 Financially Feasible Plan

The Oregon Department of Transportation Budget

Capital Improvement Projects

Northern Virginia Transportation Commission: 2018 Legislative and Policy Agenda

Transcription:

OHIO MPO & LARGE CITY CAPITAL PROGRAM SFY 2017 SUMMARY Revised 9/19/2017

TABLE OF CONTENTS MPO AND LARGE CITY PROGRAM OVERVIEW... 3 MPO AND LARGE CITY SFY 2017 STBG BUDGET SUMMARY... 4 MPO AND LARGE CITY SFY 2017 CMAQ BUDGET SUMMARY... 5 MPO AND LARGE CITY SFY 2017 TA BUDGET SUMMARY... 6 MPO AND LARGE CITY SFY 2017 TOTAL BUDGET SUMMARY... 7 MPO AND LARGE CITY SFY 2017... 8 TOTAL SUMMARY... 9 OHIO STATEWIDE URBAN CMAQ COMMITTEE... 10 LARGE MPOs AKRON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY (AMATS)... 11 EASTGATE... 12 MID-OHIO REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION (MORPC)... 13 MIAMI VALLEY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION (MVRPC)... 14 NORTHEAST OHIO AREAWIDE COORDINATING AGENCY (NOACA)... 15 OHIO KENTUCKY INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL (OKI)... 16 STARK COUNTY AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY (SCATS)... 17 TOLEDO METROPOLITAN AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (TMACOG)... 18 SMALL MPOs BEL-O-MAR... 19 BROOKE-HANCOCK-JEFFERSON METROPOLITAN PLANNING COMMISSION (BHJ)... 20 CLARK COUNTY SPRINGFIELD TRANSPORTATION COORDINATING COMMITTEE (CCSTCC)... 21 ERIE REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION (ERPC)... 22 KYOVA... 23 LIMA-ALLEN COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION (LACRPC)... 24 LICKING COUNTY AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY (LCATS)... 25 RICHLAND COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION (RCRPC)... 26 WOOD-WASHINGTON-WIRT INTERSTATE PLANNING COMMISSION (WWW)... 27 LARGE CITIES FINDLAY... 28 LANCASTER... 29 MARION... 30 WOOSTER... 31 ZANESVILLE... 32 DEFINITIONS... 33 August 2017 Office of Statewide Planning and Research 2

MPO AND LARGE CITY PROGRAM OVERVIEW The Ohio Department of Transportation () annually allocates funds from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to Ohio s 17 Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) and five large cities located outside of Ohio MPO areas. MPOs are federally recognized transportation planning entities in US Census designated urbanized areas with a population exceeding 50,000. Federal planning regulations require MPOs to conduct multimodal transportaiton planning programs for urbanized areas that are separate, but coordinated with, the State Department of Transportations statewide transportation planning process. Federal certification of the MPO transportation planning process is required to receive federal transportation funds. MPO membership includes local elected officials, public transit operators, and state transportation officials. identifies large cities as municipalities with populations between 25,000 and 50,000 that are located outside of Ohio MPO areas. The MPO and Large City Program transportation budgets include three separate FHWA funds: MPO and Large City Boundaries Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBG) Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Transportation Alternatives Program (TA) The MPO and Large City annual capital budgets provide an important source of locally directed federal funding to assist Ohio s urban areas in maintaining, operating, and improving their multimodal transportation networks. The MPOs and cities manage this budget by selecting and monitoring the implementation of fiscally balanced, multi-year programs of local government sponsored transportation improvement projects within their respective geographies. Projects are to address identifeid system needs and result in measurable improvement to local transportation network conditions. By policy, encourages MPOs and large cities to maximize annual project awards and minimize annual budget carry forward. In order to meet these policy goals, the MPOs and large cities must closely collaborate with local government project sponsors, project development consultants, and project managers to assure projects are developed and awarded on schedule, on scope, and within budget. August 2017 Office of Statewide Planning and Research 3

MPO AND LARGE CITY PROGRAM SFY 2017 STBG BUDGET SUMMARY Each MPO and large city receives an annual STBG budget allocation. STBG budgets are comprised of federally required allocations and discretionary allocations. All MPOs and large cities receive a discretionary allocation with large MPOs (those with a population greater than 200,000) also receiving a federally required allocation. In SFY 2017, $149 million of STBG budget was available for the MPO and Large City Program. From this amount, $9.7 million was unexpended and carried forward to SFY 2018. Individual budgets are proportionate to the MPO and large cities populations. STBG funding is eligible for financing a wide range of multimodal preservation, operating, and capital projects. Eligible project types include: Construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, resurfacing, restoration, and operational improvements for federal aid highways and bridges on any public road Capital costs for transit projects Carpool projects, fringe and corridor parking facilities and programs, Bicycle transportation and pedestrian walkways Highway and transit safety infrastructure improvements and programs Capital and operating costs for traffic monitoring, management, and control facilities STBG Available $9.7 M $139 M *Totals listed are approximations in millions of dollars August 2017 Office of Statewide Planning and Research 4

MPO AND LARGE CITY PROGRAM SFY 2017 CMAQ BUDGET SUMMARY MPOs containing current or previous US EPA designated air quality areas receive annual CMAQ budgets. Fifteen of the 17 MPOs meet this criteria. The eight large MPOs (populations exceeding 200,000 in Ohio) are grouped into a single statewide program with one statewide budget. These eight MPOs collectively solicit, select, and monitor the implementation of an annual program of CMAQ projects. Managing these eight MPOs CMAQ programs with a single unified budget positions the program to maximize project expenditures and finance projects with the greatest air quality returns for Ohio. The remaining seven CMAQ eligible MPOs (populations less than 200,000 in Ohio) receive individual budget allocations. MPO CMAQ budgets are discretionary funding allocations. In SFY 2017, $82 million of CMAQ budget was available for the MPO program. From this amount, $9.5 million was unexpended and carried forward to SFY 2018. CMAQ Program funding is eligible for financing projects that will result in reductions of mobile source emissions. Eligible project types include: Traffic flow congestion mitigation projects such as turn lanes, roundabouts, traffic signal, and intersection improvements Diesel engine retrofits and advanced truck technologies Freight and intermodal projects Transit capital and new service operations Travel Demand Management Bicycle and pedestrian improvements Carpooling and vanpooling Alternative fuels and vehicles CMAQ Available $9.5 M $72M *Totals listed are approximations in millions of dollars August 2017 Office of Statewide Planning and Research 5

MPO AND LARGE CITY PROGRAM SFY 2017 TA BUDGET SUMMARY Each MPO receives an annual TA program budget totaling 10% of its STBG budget. All MPOs and large cities receive a discretionary allocation with large MPOs (those with a population greater than 200,000) also receiving a federally required allocatin. In SFY 2017, $20 million of TA budget was available for the MPO program. From this amount, $3.8 million was unexpended and carried forward to SFY 2018. The TA program provides a funding source for projects that will advance modal transportation options and integrate transportation infrastructure within social and natural environments. Eligible project types include: On- and off-road pedestrian and bicycle facilities Community improvement activities Environmental mitigation Recreational trail program projects Safe routes to school projects Planning, designing, or constructing boulevards and other roadways largely in the right-of-way of former Interstate System routes or other divided highways The Bel-O-Mar, LARPC, LCATS, and WWW MPOs return their annual budget allocations to in order to participate in the statewide TA program. TA Available $3.8 M $16 M *Totals listed are approximations in millions of dollars August 2017 Office of Statewide Planning and Research 6

MPO AND LARGE CITY PROGRAM SFY 2017 TOTAL BUDGET SUMMARY Original Available Original Available Original Available AMATS $10,179,497 $3,771,563 $1,017,950 $1,904,793 Eastgate $5,499,301 $7,144,534 $549,931 $657,469 MORPC $21,515,026 $26,216,477 $2,151,502 $4,663,273 MVRPC $11,630,502 $13,469,125 Ohio Statewide CMAQ $1,163,050 $1,755,158 NOACA $29,596,848 $36,866,343 Committee $2,959,683 $3,909,620 OKI $22,130,775 $31,173,916 $2,213,078 $3,512,214 SCATS $5,013,231 $5,910,427 $501,323 $1,208,282 TMACOG $8,060,145 $8,979,558 $806,015 $1,552,664 Bel-O-Mar $433,300 $1,114,110 $535,767 $647,849 BHJ $667,907 $99,480 $530,508 $1,488,805 $66,791 $17,891 CCSTCC $1,660,781 $1,273,130 $1,052,759 $1,979,116 $166,079 $471,168 ERPC $964,151 $2,196,107 $96,415 $300,831 KYOVA $531,023 $231,318 $390,623 $871,640 $53,102 $94,079 LACRPC $1,205,318 $1,450,957 $809,213 $841,513 LCATS $1,239,519 $2,028,038 $1,022,599 $571,154 RCRPC $1,350,096 $2,365,307 $135,009 $99,515 WWW $341,620 $653,687 $326,795 $560,479 Findlay $646,702 $787,964 Lancaster $608,686 $1,057,743 Marion $578,189 $809,952 Wooster $409,960 $550,311 Zanesville $400,041 $935,347 Statewide CMAQ $60,720,552 $74,820,954 Total $124,662,618 $149,085,394 $65,388,816 $81,781,510 $11,879,928 $20,146,958 August 2017 Office of Statewide Planning and Research 7

MPO AND LARGE CITY PROGRAM SFY 2017 In SFY 2017, the MPO and Large City Program awarded 126 construction projects and financed 47 public transit projects. These projects, along with other MPO and large city expenditures totaled $227.8 million. The tables below depict the range of transportation investments financed in SFY 2017. The ongoing focus of the MPO and Large City Program is to deliver an annual program of local government sponsored multimodal transportation improvement projects in Ohio s urban regions. This funding source is an important catalyst for maintaining and enhancing regional transportation mobility and accessibility, promoting economic growth, and advancing community livability. Achieving these outcomes necessitates that the MPOs and large cities, and their partners, continually monitor the program for improvement opportunities. Takeaways from the SFY 2017 program and areas for programs improvements are: Maintaining minimal annual budget carry forward balances into the subsequent SFY is a programmatic priority. The SFY 2017 carry forward balance is $6 million less than the SFY 2016 amount, reflecting a positive trend line. However, this decrease was achieved due to a $10 million late year budget loan to another Central Office capital program. Successfully maintaining a low carry forward balance requires each MPO/large city to pursue a multi-year program of projects that are actively under preliminary development and design. There are a number of small MPOs and large cities that have established a multi-year program of projects. In SFY 2017, 47% of the MPO and Large City Program projects were awarded in the 4th quarter. There is inherent risk in 4th quarter awards. If a project bidding problem occurs there is no time to rebid the project and it misses the SFY award schedule. Scheduling a disproportionately high percentage of awards in the 4th quarter extends this risk to a larger number of projects. recommends project awards be scheduled with a 20/30/30/20 quarterly distribution. The remainder of this report shows the detailed SFY 2017 budgets, project expenditures, and carry forward balances for each MPO and large city. The readers attention is directed to the percent Original and percent Original Carrie results. Successful programs will reflect high budget expenditure percentages and low carry forward percentages. Passenger Centers s 2 Construction Projects Bicycle / Pedestrian 29 CNG Refueling Infrastructure 1 Bridge Capacity Addition 5 16 Electric Trolley Bus Replacement 3 Landscaping / Lighting 3 LTV Replacements 12 Intersection Pavement 10 44 Heavy Duty Bus Replacements 28 Rehab/ Reconstruction 12 New Service 1 Signals 7 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 August 2017 Office of Statewide Planning and Research 8

MPO AND LARGE CITY PROGRAM TOTAL SFY 2017 Original 17 17 STBG $124,662,618 $149,085,394 $129,157,621 $407,820 $254,000 $6,756,493 $9,688,392 111.82% 7.77% CMAQ $65,388,816 $81,781,510 $53,896,025 $206,771 $14,041,852 $262,741 $9,514,970 110.52% 14.55% TA $12,201,904 $20,146,958 $16,191,337 $73,354 $0 $0 $3,882,266 133.30% 31.82% STBG Planning $0 $2,821,068 - - - CMAQ Planning - $3,859,150 - - - - Totals $202,253,338 $251,013,861 $205,925,202 $687,945 $14,295,852 $7,019,234 $23,085,628 Total 2017 Encumbrances and : as % of Original 2017 : $227,928,233 112.69% as % of Available 2017 : 90.80% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2017: 126 $160.00 $140.00 $120.00 $250 $200 $100.00 $80.00 $60.00 $150 $100 $40.00 $20.00 0 $50 $0 Original SFY 13 SFY 14 SFY 15 SFY 16 SFY 17 5 Year - Trend August 2017 Office of Statewide Planning and Research 9

OHIO STATEWIDE CMAQ COMMITTEE Original STBG - - - - - - - - CMAQ $60,720,552 $74,820,954 $49,853,586 $175,808 $13,636,852 $0 $7,432,557 104.85% 12.24% TA - - - - - - - - STBG Planning - - - - - - CMAQ Planning - $3,722,150 - - - - Totals $60,720,552 $74,820,954 $53,575,736 $175,808 $13,636,852 $0 $7,432,557 Total 2017 Encumbrances and : $67,388,396 as % of Original 2017 : 110.98% as % of Available 2017 : 90.07% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2017: ** Ohio Statewide CMAQ Committee construction contracts awarded are shown on the respective MPO Program Management Summary pages. ** $80 $70 $60 $50 $40 $30 $20 AMATS Eastgate MORPC NOACA OKI SCATS $10 $0 MVRPC TMACOG MPOs participating 5 Year - in Statewide CMAQ Trendprogram August 2017 Office of Statewide Planning and Research 10

AMATS (AKRON) Original STBG $10,179,497 $3,771,563 $2,759,395 $17,229 $0 $0 $994,939 27.28% 9.77% CMAQ** TA $1,017,950 $1,904,793 $1,061,934 $55,924 $0 $0 $786,935 109.81% 77.31% STBG Planning - $0 - - - - CMAQ Planning** - - - - - Totals $11,197,447 $5,676,356 $3,821,329 $73,153 $0 $0 $1,781,874 Total 2017 Encumbrances and : as % of Original 2017 : as % of Available 2017 : Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2017: $3,894,482 34.78% 68.61% 9 ** See page 10 for more information about the Ohio Statewide CMAQ Committee. SFY 13-14 included CMAQ funding in both the Orignial and chart below. SFY 15-17 does not include it as it is included under the Statewide CMAQ program. $4.0 $18 $3.5 $16 Original $3.0 $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 $14 $12 $10 $8 $6 $4 $2 $0 5 Year - Trend August 2017 Office of Statewide Planning and Research 11

EASTGATE (YOUNGSTOWN) F G H Original STBG $5,499,301 $7,144,534 $5,681,287 $18,565 $0 $0 $1,394,683 104.56% 25.36% CMAQ** TA $549,931 $657,469 $642,363 $0 $0 $0 $15,106 116.81% 2.75% STBG Planning - $50,000 - - - - CMAQ Planning** - - - - - Totals $6,049,232 $7,802,004 $6,373,650 $18,565 $0 $0 $1,409,789 Total 2017 Encumbrances and : as % of Original 2017 : as % of Available 2017 : 81.93% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2017: $6,392,215 105.67% ** See page 10 for more information about the Ohio Statewide CMAQ Committee. SFY 13-14 included CMAQ funding in both the Orignial and chart below. SFY 15-17 does not include it as it is included under the Statewide CMAQ program. 10 $8 $7 $6 $18.0 $16.0 $14.0 Original $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 $12.0 $10.0 $8.0 $6.0 $4.0 $2.0 $0 5 Year - Trend August 2017 Office of Statewide Planning and Research 12

MORPC (COLUMBUS) Original STBG $21,515,026 $26,216,477 $23,359,606 $14,920 $0 $993,200 $1,298,751 115.82% 6.04% CMAQ** TA $2,151,502 $4,663,273 $4,658,369 $0 $0 $0 $4,903 216.52% 0.23% STBG Planning - $550,000 - - - - CMAQ Planning** - - - - - Totals $23,666,528 $30,879,749 $28,567,976 $14,920 $0 $993,200 $1,303,654 Total 2017 Encumbrances and : $29,576,095 as % of Original 2017 : as % of Available 2017 : Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2017: 124.97% 95.78% ** See page 10 for more information about the Ohio Statewide CMAQ Committee. SFY 13-14 included CMAQ funding in both the Orignial and chart below. SFY 15-17 does not include it as it is included under the Statewide CMAQ program. 8 $30 $25 $20 $15 $10 $40 $35 $30 $25 $20 $15 Original $5 $10 $5 $0 $0 5 Year - Trend August 2017 Office of Statewide Planning and Research 13

MVRPC (DAYTON) Original STBG $11,630,502 $13,469,125 $12,806,410 $19,967 $0 $0 $81,436 115.11% 0.70% CMAQ** TA $1,163,050 $1,755,158 $1,214,982 $17,430 $0 $0 $522,746 105.96% 44.95% STBG Planning - $561,311 - - - - CMAQ Planning** - - - - - Totals $12,793,552 $15,224,283 $14,582,704 $37,397 $0 $0 $604,183 Total 2017 Encumbrances and : $14,620,100 as % of Original 2017 : as % of Available 2017 : Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2017: 114.28% 96.03% ** See page 10 for more information about the Ohio Statewide CMAQ Committee. SFY 13-14 included CMAQ funding in both the Orignial and chart below. SFY 15-17 does not include it as it is included under the Statewide CMAQ program. 23 $16 $14 $12 $25 $20 $10 $8 $6 $15 $10 $4 $2 $5 Original $0 $0 5 Year - Trend August 2017 Office of Statewide Planning and Research 14

NOACA (CLEVELAND) Original STBG $29,596,848 $36,866,343 $31,564,027 $96,439 $254,000 $3,293,309 $1,003,591 121.17% 3.39% CMAQ** TA $2,959,683 $3,909,620 $2,348,433 $0 $0 $0 $1,561,188 79.35% 52.75% STBG Planning - $654,977 - - - - CMAQ Planning** - - - - - Totals $32,556,531 $40,775,964 $34,567,437 $96,439 $254,000 $3,293,309 $2,564,779 Total 2017 Encumbrances and : $38,211,185 as % of Original 2017 : as % of Available 2017 : Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2017: 117.37% 93.71% ** See page 10 for more information about the Ohio Statewide CMAQ Committee. SFY 13-14 included CMAQ funding in both the Orignial and chart below. SFY 15-17 does not include it as it is included under the Statewide CMAQ program. 17 $40 $35 $30 $25 $20 $15 $10 $5 $50 $45 $40 $35 $30 $25 $20 $15 $10 $5 Original $0 $0 5 Year - Trend August 2017 Office of Statewide Planning and Research 15

OKI (CINCINNATI) Original STBG $22,130,775 $31,173,916 $27,937,849 $74,671 $0 $2,000,000 $686,616 137.76% 3.10% CMAQ** TA $2,213,078 $3,512,214 $3,491,830 $0 $0 $0 $20,384 157.78% 0.92% STBG Planning - $474,780 - - - - CMAQ Planning** - - - - - Totals $24,343,853 $34,686,130 $31,904,459 $74,671 $0 $2,000,000 $707,000 Total 2017 Encumbrances and : $33,979,130 as % of Original 2017 : as % of Available 2017 : Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2017: 139.58% 97.96% ** See page 10 for more information about the Ohio Statewide CMAQ Committee. SFY 13-14 included CMAQ funding in both the Orignial and chart below. SFY 15-17 does not include it as it is included under the Statewide CMAQ program. 13 $35 $30 $25 $40 $35 $30 $20 $15 $10 $25 $20 $15 $10 Original $5 $5 $0 $0 5 Year - Trend August 2017 Office of Statewide Planning and Research 16

SCATS (CANTON) Original STBG $5,013,231 $5,910,427 $5,719,344 $0 $0 $0 $191,083 114.08% 3.81% CMAQ** TA $501,323 $1,208,282 $1,208,281 $0 $0 $0 $0 241.02% 0.00% STBG Planning - $0 - - - - CMAQ Planning** - - - - - Totals $5,514,554 $7,118,709 $6,927,625 $0 $0 $0 $191,084 Total 2017 Encumbrances and : $6,927,625 as % of Original 2017 : as % of Available 2017 : Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2017: 125.62% 97.32% ** See page 10 for more information about the Ohio Statewide CMAQ Committee. SFY 13-14 included CMAQ funding in both the Orignial and chart below. SFY 15-17 does not include it as it is included under the Statewide CMAQ program. 6 $7 $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 $18 $16 $14 $12 $10 $8 $6 $4 $2 Original $0 $0 5 Year - Trend August 2017 Office of Statewide Planning and Research 17

TMACOG (TOLEDO) Original STBG $8,060,145 $8,979,558 $6,655,610 $101,727 $0 $469,983 $1,672,238 90.66% 20.75% CMAQ** TA $806,015 $1,552,664 $1,303,122 $0 $0 $0 $249,542 161.67% 30.96% STBG Planning - $80,000 - - - - CMAQ Planning** - - - - - Totals $8,866,160 $10,532,221 $8,038,731 $101,727 $0 $469,983 $1,921,780 Total 2017 Encumbrances and : $8,610,442 as % of Original 2017 : as % of Available 2017 : Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2017: 97.12% 81.75% ** See page 10 for more information about the Ohio Statewide CMAQ Committee. SFY 13-14 included CMAQ funding in both the Orignial and chart below. SFY 15-17 does not include it as it is included under the Statewide CMAQ program. 13 $10 $9 $8 $7 $14 $12 $10 Original $6 $5 $4 $8 $6 $3 $2 $1 $4 $2 $0 $0 5 Year - Trend August 2017 Office of Statewide Planning and Research 18

BEL-O-MAR (BRIDGEPORT) Original STBG $433,300 $1,114,110 $1,000,910 $0 $0 $0 $113,201 231.00% 26.13% CMAQ $535,767 $647,849 $0 $0 $0 $0 $647,849 0.00% 120.92% TA $43,330 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00% 0.00% STBG Planning - $0 - - - - CMAQ Planning - $0 - - - - Totals $1,012,397 $1,761,959 $1,000,910 $0 $0 $0 $761,049 Total 2017 Encumbrances and : $1,000,910 as % of Original 2017 : 98.87% as % of Available 2017 : 56.81% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2017: 1 $1.2 $0.8 $0.6 $4.0 $3.5 $3.0 $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 Original 5 Year - Trend August 2017 Office of Statewide Planning and Research 19

BHJ (STEUBENVILLE) Original STBG $667,907 $99,480 $74,478 $0 $0 $0 $1 14.89% 0.00% CMAQ $530,508 $1,488,805 $1,398,804 $0 $0 $0 $1 280.64% 0.00% TA $66,791 $17,891 $0 $0 $0 $0 $17,891 0.00% 26.79% STBG Planning - $25,000 - - - - CMAQ Planning - $90,000 - - - - Totals $1,265,206 $1,606,176 $1,588,282 $0 $0 $0 $17,893 Total 2017 Encumbrances and : $1,588,282 as % of Original 2017 : 125.54% as % of Available 2017 : 98.89% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2017: 1 $1.6 $1.4 $1.2 $0.8 $0.6 $1.4 $1.2 $0.8 $0.6 Original 5 Year - Trend August 2017 Office of Statewide Planning and Research 20

CCSTCC (SPRINGFIELD) Original STBG $1,660,781 $1,273,130 $1,125,287 $0 $0 $0 $147,843 67.76% 8.90% CMAQ $1,052,759 $1,979,116 $1,412,239 $0 $0 $0 $519,877 138.61% 49.38% TA $166,079 $471,168 $173,801 $0 $0 $0 $297,367 104.65% 179.05% STBG Planning - $0 - - - - CMAQ Planning - $47,000 - - - - Totals $2,879,619 $3,723,414 $2,758,326 $0 $0 $0 $965,088 Total 2017 Encumbrances and : $2,758,326 as % of Original 2017 : 95.79% as % of Available 2017 : 74.08% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2017: 4 $2.5 $2.0 $4.0 $3.5 $3.0 $1.5 $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 Original 5 Year - Trend August 2017 Office of Statewide Planning and Research 21

ERPC (SANDUSKY) Original STBG $964,151 $2,196,107 $2,151,688 $0 $0 $0 $44,419 223.17% 4.61% CMAQ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - - TA $96,415 $300,831 $73,502 $0 $0 $0 $227,329 76.24% 235.78% STBG Planning - $0 - - - - CMAQ Planning - $0 - - - - Totals $1,060,566 $2,496,938 $2,225,190 $0 $0 $0 $271,748 Total 2017 Encumbrances and : $2,225,190 as % of Original 2017 : 209.81% as % of Available 2017 : 89.12% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2017: 5 $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 $5.0 $4.5 $4.0 $3.5 $3.0 $2.5 $2.0 Original $1.5 5 Year - Trend August 2017 Office of Statewide Planning and Research 22

KYOVA (IRONTON) Original STBG $531,023 $231,318 $0 $0 $0 $0 $31,318 37.66% 5.90% CMAQ $390,623 $871,640 $0 $0 $275,000 $262,741 $333,899 137.66% 85.48% TA $53,102 $94,079 $0 $0 $0 $0 $94,079 0.00% 177.17% STBG Planning - $200,000 - - - - CMAQ Planning - $0 - - - - Totals $974,748 $1,197,037 $200,000 $0 $275,000 $262,741 $459,296 Total 2017 Encumbrances and : $737,741 as % of Original 2017 : 75.69% as % of Available 2017 : 61.63% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2017: 0 $0.9 $0.8 $0.7 $0.6 $0.3 $0.1 $1.2 $0.8 $0.6 Original 5 Year - Trend August 2017 Office of Statewide Planning and Research 23

LACRPC (LIMA) Original STBG $1,205,318 $1,450,957 $1,204,964 $6,339 $0 $0 $39,654 117.09% 3.29% CMAQ $809,213 $841,513 $543,956 $0 $130,000 $0 $167,557 83.29% 20.71% TA $120,532 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00% 0.00% STBG Planning - $200,000 - - - - CMAQ Planning - $0 - - - - Totals $2,135,063 $2,292,470 $1,948,920 $6,339 $130,000 $0 $207,211 Total 2017 Encumbrances and : $2,085,259 as % of Original 2017 : 97.67% as % of Available 2017 : 90.96% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2017: 4 $1.6 $1.4 $1.2 $2.5 $2.0 $0.8 $0.6 $1.5 Original 5 Year - Trend August 2017 Office of Statewide Planning and Research 24

LCATS (NEWARK) Original STBG $1,239,519 $2,028,038 $1,605,683 $33,571 $0 $0 $388,785 132.25% 31.37% CMAQ $1,022,599 $571,154 $309,597 $30,963 $0 $0 $230,594 33.30% 22.55% TA $123,952 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00% 0.00% STBG Planning - $0 - - - - CMAQ Planning - $0 - - - - Totals $2,386,070 $2,599,192 $1,915,280 $64,534 $0 $0 $619,378 Total 2017 Encumbrances and : $1,979,813 as % of Original 2017 : 82.97% as % of Available 2017 : 76.17% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2017: 3 $2.5 $2.0 $4.0 $3.5 $3.0 $1.5 $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 Original 5 Year - Trend August 2017 Office of Statewide Planning and Research 25

RCRPC (MANSFIELD) Original STBG $1,350,096 $2,365,307 $2,214,844 $0 $0 $0 $150,463 164.05% 11.14% CMAQ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - - TA $135,009 $99,515 $14,720 $0 $0 $0 $84,795 10.90% 62.81% STBG Planning - $0 - - - - CMAQ Planning - $0 - - - - Totals $1,485,105 $2,464,822 $2,229,564 $0 $0 $0 $235,257 Total 2017 Encumbrances and : $2,229,564 as % of Original 2017 : 150.13% as % of Available 2017 : 90.46% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2017: 1 $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 Original 5 Year - Trend August 2017 Office of Statewide Planning and Research 26

WWW (BELPRE-MARIETTA) Original STBG $341,620 $653,687 $512,763 $0 $0 $0 $115,924 157.42% 33.93% CMAQ $326,795 $560,479 $377,842 $0 $0 $0 $182,637 115.62% 55.89% TA $34,162 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00% 0.00% STBG Planning - $25,000 - - - - CMAQ Planning - $0 - - - - Totals $702,577 $1,214,166 $915,605 $0 $0 $0 $298,561 Total 2017 Encumbrances and : $915,605 as % of Original 2017 : 130.32% as % of Available 2017 : 75.41% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2017: 2 $0.7 $0.6 $0.8 $0.7 $0.6 $0.3 $0.1 $0.3 $0.1 Original 5 Year - Trend August 2017 Office of Statewide Planning and Research 27

FINDLAY Original STBG $646,702 $787,964 $629,602 $0 $0 $0 $158,362 97.36% 24.49% CMAQ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TA $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 STBG Planning - $0 - - - - CMAQ Planning - $0 - - - - Totals $646,702 $787,964 $629,602 $0 $0 $0 $158,362 Total 2017 Encumbrances and : $629,602 as % of Original 2017 : 97.36% as % of Available 2017 : 79.90% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2017: 1 $0.9 $0.8 $0.7 $0.6 $0.7 $0.6 Original $0.3 $0.1 $0.3 $0.1 5 Year - Trend August 2017 Office of Statewide Planning and Research 28

LANCASTER Original STBG $608,686 $1,057,743 $530,884 $818 $0 $0 $526,042 87.35% 86.42% CMAQ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TA $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 STBG Planning - $0 - - - - CMAQ Planning - $0 - - - - Totals $608,686 $1,057,743 $530,884 $818 $0 $0 $526,042 Total 2017 Encumbrances and : $531,702 as % of Original 2017 : 87.35% as % of Available 2017 : 50.27% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2017: 2 $1.2 $0.8 $0.6 $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 Original 5 Year - Trend August 2017 Office of Statewide Planning and Research 29

MARION Original STBG $578,189 $809,952 $513,667 $20,543 $0 $0 $275,742 92.39% 47.69% CMAQ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TA $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 STBG Planning - $0 - - - - CMAQ Planning - $0 - - - - Totals $578,189 $809,952 $513,667 $20,543 $0 $0 $275,742 Total 2017 Encumbrances and : $534,210 as % of Original 2017 : 92.39% as % of Available 2017 : 65.96% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2017: 1 $0.9 $0.8 $0.7 $0.6 $0.3 $1.2 $0.8 $0.6 Original $0.1 5 Year - Trend August 2017 Office of Statewide Planning and Research 30

WOOSTER Original STBG $409,960 $550,311 $550,311 $0 $0 $0 $0 134.24% 0.00% CMAQ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TA $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 STBG Planning - $0 - - - - CMAQ Planning - $0 - - - - Totals $409,960 $550,311 $550,311 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total 2017 Encumbrances and : $550,311 as % of Original 2017 : 134.24% as % of Available 2017 : 100.00% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2017: 1 $0.6 $0.3 $0.1 $0.3 $0.3 $0.1 $0.1 Original 5 Year - Trend August 2017 Office of Statewide Planning and Research 31

ZANESVILLE Original STBG $400,041 $935,347 $559,014 $3,032 $0 $0 $373,301 140.50% 93.32% CMAQ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TA $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 STBG Planning - $0 - - - - CMAQ Planning - $0 - - - - Totals $400,041 $935,347 $559,014 $3,032 $0 $0 $373,301 Total 2017 Encumbrances and : $562,045 as % of Original 2017 : 140.50% as % of Available 2017 : 60.09% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2017: 1 $0.9 $0.8 $0.7 $0.6 $0.3 $0.1 $0.6 $0.3 $0.1 Original 5 Year - Trend August 2017 Office of Statewide Planning and Research 32

DEFINITIONS Original The total new budget allocated by to Ohio s MPOs and large cities in SFY 2017 Available 2017 The available SFY 2017 budget is a component of the original budget allocation and accumulated carry forward budgets from previous years. Available budget also reflects porgram budget trades, which are transfers of budget between programs or between MPOs, to be repaid in a later fiscal year. totals are those that have been recorded in s accounting system in SFY 2017 that are not recorded as encumbrances in s accounting system due to the nature of the expenditure. There are three types of unencumbered expenditures: LET CE: expenditures for staff construction engineering labor costs on let projects. : expenditures made to pay back previously secured loans. : FHWA funding that is transferred to for financing of Regional Transit Authority projects. 17 Accumulated carry forward budgets that will roll into SFY 2018. The carry forward totals are the difference between the available SFY 2017 budgets and the encumbrances and unencumbered expenditures that took place in SFY 2017 ( + ) / Original SFY 2017 SFY 2017 / Original SFY 2017 August 2017 Office of Statewide Planning and Research 33