FY Performance Measurement Module (Sys PM)

Similar documents
Performance Measurement Module (Sys PM)

FY Performance Measurement Module (Sys PM)

HUD 2016 System Performance Measures Submission Recap. NYC Coalition on the Continuum of Care October 20, 2017

Summary of 3 County CoC SPM Report Data

Santa Clara County Performance Measures - Updated July 1, June 30, 2019

Santa Clara County Performance Measures - finalized July 1, June 30, 2017

2018 Performance Management Plan. Ohio Balance of State Continuum of Care Updated January 2018

Office of Community Planning and Development

Using Data to Make Funding and Reallocation Decisions

Attachment C. Updated March 23 rd, 2018 by EveryOne Home

[HUDX-225] HMIS Data Quality Report Reference Tool

Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Continuum of Care 2017 Renewal Project Performance Scorecard

FY16 HUD CoC Program Consolidated Application Scoring Criteria Summary June 2016

HUD CoC Reviewing, Scoring and Ranking Procedure

Continuum of Care Written Standards for NY- 508 Buffalo, Niagara Falls/Erie, Niagara, Orleans, Genesee, Wyoming Counties CoC

SACRAMENTO HOMELESS MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM: DATA QUALITY PLAN

HUD-ESG CAPER User Guide

King County Base Year Calculator Results Emergency Shelter for Family Projects Performance Summary March 11, 2016

COC RANKING For Grant Year 2017

HMIS 320 APR Training

AGENDA. 1. Welcome and Introductions. 2. Review IRP Meeting Summary from Feb. 7, HUD CoC Program NOFA

GLOSSARY HMIS STANDARD REPORTING TERMINOLOGY. A reference guide for methods of selecting clients and data used commonly in HMIS-generated reports

APR Data: # of Clients: # of Households # of Adults # of Leavers: # of Adult Leavers:

GLOSSARY HMIS STANDARD REPORTING TERMINOLOGY. A reference guide for methods of selecting clients and data used commonly in HMIS-generated reports

FY2017 CoC Program Competition Application Score Cards

FY2019 HCCSC SCORING CRITERIA AND SCORE SHEET

NY-606/Rockland County CoC Rank & Review - Attachments Checklist

HMIS PROGRAMMING SPECIFICATIONS

2017 Saratoga-North Country CoC Project Rank & Review Application

2018 Kentucky Balance of State CoC Expansion Project Scoresheet for RRH and PSH Projects (Approved by KY BoS CoC Advisory Board August 3, 2018)

Blue Ridge Interagency Council on Homelessness

Toledo Lucas County Continuum of Care: 2016 Key Performance Indicators

Metropolitan Denver Homeless Initiative 2016 CoC NOFA Evaluation Tool for Renewal Project Applications

Measure 1: Length of Time Persons Remain Homeless

Before Starting the Exhibit 1 Continuum of Care (CoC) Application

HMIS Programming Specifications PATH Annual Report. January 2018

Frequently Asked Questions Regarding the BYC and SPP

Toledo Lucas County Continuum of Care: 2014 Key Performance Indicators

The Community Partnership How to Run the CoC-APR 2018 Report Version 1 Last Updated December 17, 2018

1A. Continuum of Care (CoC) Identification

HMIS REQUIRED UNIVERSAL DATA ELEMENTS

DESTINATION Which of the following most closely matches where the client will be staying right after leaving this project?

2019 Housing Inventory Count (HIC) Guidance Document

Exhibit 5-3: Sample Performance Measurement Framework (Note that all activities, outputs, outcomes, and percentages are hypothetical.

Homeless Management Information System (HMIS)

HMIS Data Standards: HMIS Data. Dictionary. Released May, 2014 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Volume 2

Santa Barbara County HMIS Data Quality Plan

Gloucester County s 2017 Point-In-Time Count of the Homeless

The Role of HUD s Homeless and Mainstream Housing Programs in Ending Homelessness. Jennifer Ho Ann Marie Oliva Marcy Thompson

Counts! Bergen County s 2017 Point-In-Time Count of the Homeless

FY 2017 TX BoS CoC Review, Score, and Ranking Procedures and Reallocation Process for HUD Continuum of Care Program Funds

Updated 01/22/2019 ID 24, Page 1 of 5

Continuum of Care (CoC) and Emergency Solutions Grant Program (ESG) 2015 Policy Manual

2017 Point in Time Count

Ending Homelessness in Alameda County Strategic Plan Update

NOTES. Step 2: choose the correct city if 2 or more cities share the same ZIP Code.

2014 RELEASE WEBINAR TIPS AGENDA. Westchester County HMIS a project of the Continuum of Care Partnership

Demographics. Housing Security in the Washington Region. Fairfax County, Fairfax City and Falls Church Cities

Demographics. Housing Security in the Washington Region. District of Columbia

Demographics. Housing Security in the Washington Region. Arlington County

SuperNOFA FY2012 Performance Measures Cheat Sheet

Summary and Analysis of the Interim ESG Rule December 2011

Full DOB reported Approximate or Partial DOB reported

TOOL OVERVIEW. FY2019 CoC Program Competition Renewal Project Scoring Tool

Full DOB reported Approximate or Partial DOB reported. Non Hispanic/Non Latino Hispanic/Latino

New Hampshire Continua of Care APR Housing Opportunities for People with AIDS (HOPWA) Exit Form for HMIS

CoC Annual Performance Report (APR) Guide

NAEH Conference. Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) Program. February 2014

The 2017 HUD CoC Annual Performance Report (CoC-APR) Training for the Ohio Balance of State and Mahoning CoCs

a. Standard policies and procedures for evaluating individuals and families eligibility for assistance under Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG).

2009 Annual Homeless Assessment Report (AHAR)

New Hampshire Continua of Care SGIA Homelessness Prevention (HP) Project Record Creation Intake Entry Services Exit Packet

Sheltered Homeless Persons. Idaho Balance of State 10/1/2009-9/30/2010

PSH Renewal Review & Scoring Document

ESG CAPER Helper Guide

CLARITY HMIS: HUD-CoC PROJECT INTAKE FORM

Sheltered Homeless Persons. Tarrant County/Ft. Worth 10/1/2012-9/30/2013

SHELTER DIVERSION ServicePoint Handbook

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY HOMELESS ACTION PARTNERSHIP

Exit Form: Print on Light-Blue Paper

HMIS Data Standards DATA DICTIONARY

National Population Demographics

Data Quality Plan Tampa / Hillsborough County Continuum of Care

Universal Intake Form

How to Pull Your APR (Annual Performance Report) to Upload into Sage

The Community Partnership HMIS Data Collection Guide Version 3 - Last Updated October 10, 2018

Joint Office of Homeless Services FY 2018 Proposed Budget

HMIS INTAKE - HOPWA. FIRST NAME MIDDLE NAME LAST NAME (and Suffix) Client Refused. Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander LIVING SITUATION

Standards for CoC- and ESG-Funded Rapid Re-Housing Programs in the Metropolitan Denver Continuum of Care

EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT (ESG) FUNDING

APR Requirements and Data Entry Workflow Review

HMIS Data Standards DATA DICTIONARY

Health Care and Homelessness 2014 Data Linkage Study

Sheltered Homeless Persons. Louisville/Jefferson County 10/1/2009-9/30/2010

2017 HUD CoC Program Rating and Review Procedure

FY2016 Detroit Continuum of Care (CoC) Funding Announcements Report to Detroit CoC Board January 9, 2017

Before Starting the CoC Application

The National Center on Homelessness Among Veterans. Tom Byrne National Alliance to End Homelessness Annual Conference July 22, 2013 Washington, DC

FY 2013 NOFA Planning and Advocacy December 17, 2013

HUD Annual Performance Report (APR) Programming Specifications

Transcription:

Summary Report for VA-604 - Prince William County CoC Measure 1: Length of Time Persons Remain Homeless This measures the number of clients active in the report date range across ES, SH (Metric 1.1) and then ES, SH and TH (Metric 1.2) along with their average and median length of time homeless. This includes time homeless during the report date range as well as prior to the report start date, going back no further than October, 1, 2012. Metric 1.1: Change in the average and median length of time persons are homeless in ES and SH projects. Metric 1.2: Change in the average and median length of time persons are homeless in ES, SH, and TH projects. a. This measure is of the client s entry, exit, and bed night dates strictly as entered in the HMIS system. Universe (Persons) Average LOT Homeless Median LOT Homeless Previous FY Current FY 1.1 Persons in ES and SH 1187 1162 48 44-4 37 35-2 1.2 Persons in ES, SH, and TH 1369 1352 102 104 2 43 44 1 b. Due to changes in DS Element 3.17, metrics for measure (b) will not be reported in 2016. This measure includes data from each client s Length of Time on Street, in an Emergency Shelter, or Safe Haven (Data Standards element 3.17) response and prepends this answer to the client s entry date effectively extending the client s entry date backward in time. This adjusted entry date is then used in the calculations just as if it were the client s actual entry date. NOTE: Due to the data collection period for this year s submission, the calculations for this metric are based on the data element 3.17 that was active in HMIS from 10/1/2015 to 9/30/2016. This measure and the calculation in the SPM specifications will be updated to reflect data element 3.917 in time for next year s submission. Universe (Persons) Average LOT Homeless Median LOT Homeless Previous FY Current FY 1.1 Persons in ES and SH - 1173-94 - - 46-1.2 Persons in ES, SH, and TH - 1356-160 - - 60-5/30/2017 11:00:14 AM 1

Measure 2: The Extent to which Persons who Exit Homelessness to Permanent Housing Destinations Return to Homelessness This measures clients who exited SO, ES, TH, SH or PH to a permanent housing destination in the date range two years prior to the report date range. Of those clients, the measure reports on how many of them returned to homelessness as indicated in the HMIS for up to two years after their initial exit. Total # of Persons who Exited to a Permanent Housing Destination (2 Years Prior) Returns to Homelessness in Less than 6 Months (0-180 days) Returns to Homelessness from 6 to 12 Months (181-365 days) Returns to Homelessness from 13 to 24 Months (366-730 days) Number of Returns in 2 Years # of Returns % of Returns # of Returns % of Returns # of Returns % of Returns # of Returns % of Returns Exit was from SO 0 0 0 0 0 Exit was from ES 450 45 10% 36 8% 19 4% 100 22% Exit was from TH 105 2 2% 2 2% 2 2% 6 6% Exit was from SH 0 0 0 0 0 Exit was from PH 125 0 0% 0 0% 7 6% 7 6% TOTAL Returns to Homelessness 680 47 7% 38 6% 28 4% 113 17% 5/30/2017 11:00:14 AM 2

Measure 3: Number of Homeless Persons Metric 3.1 Change in PIT Counts This measures the change in PIT counts of sheltered and unsheltered homeless person as reported on the PIT (not from HMIS). Previous FY PIT Count 2015 PIT Count Difference Universe: Total PIT Count of sheltered and unsheltered persons 409 400-9 Emergency Shelter Total 195 173-22 Safe Haven Total 0 0 0 Transitional Housing Total 124 139 15 Total Sheltered Count 319 312-7 Unsheltered Count 90 88-2 Metric 3.2 Change in Annual Counts This measures the change in annual counts of sheltered homeless persons in HMIS. Universe: Unduplicated Total sheltered homeless persons 1369 1359-10 Emergency Shelter Total 1168 1169 1 Safe Haven Total 0 0 0 Transitional Housing Total 258 251-7 Measure 4: Employment and Income Growth for Homeless Persons in CoC Program-funded Projects Metric 4.1 Change in earned income for adult system stayers during the reporting period Universe: Number of adults (system stayers) 17 16-1 Number of adults with increased earned income 1 0-1 Percentage of adults who increased earned income 6% 0% -6% 5/30/2017 11:00:14 AM 3

Metric 4.2 Change in non-employment cash income for adult system stayers during the reporting period Universe: Number of adults (system stayers) 17 16-1 Number of adults with increased non-employment cash income 2 1-1 Percentage of adults who increased non-employment cash income 12% 6% -6% Metric 4.3 Change in total income for adult system stayers during the reporting period Universe: Number of adults (system stayers) 17 16-1 Number of adults with increased total income 2 1-1 Percentage of adults who increased total income 12% 6% -6% Metric 4.4 Change in earned income for adult system leavers Universe: Number of adults who exited (system leavers) 33 59 26 Number of adults who exited with increased earned income 12 13 1 Percentage of adults who increased earned income 36% 22% -14% Metric 4.5 Change in non-employment cash income for adult system leavers Universe: Number of adults who exited (system leavers) 33 59 26 Number of adults who exited with increased non-employment cash income 5 5 0 Percentage of adults who increased non-employment cash income 15% 8% -7% Metric 4.6 Change in total income for adult system leavers Universe: Number of adults who exited (system leavers) 33 59 26 Number of adults who exited with increased total income 15 17 2 Percentage of adults who increased total income 45% 29% -17% 5/30/2017 11:00:14 AM 4

Measure 5: Number of persons who become homeless for the 1st time Metric 5.1 Change in the number of persons entering ES, SH, and TH projects with no prior enrollments in HMIS Universe: Person with entries into ES, SH or TH during the reporting period. Of persons above, count those who were in ES, SH, TH or any PH within 24 months prior to their entry during the reporting year. Of persons above, count those who did not have entries in ES, SH, TH or PH in the previous 24 months. (i.e. Number of persons experiencing homelessness for the first time) 1172 1170-2 280 229-51 892 941 49 Metric 5.2 Change in the number of persons entering ES, SH, TH, and PH projects with no prior enrollments in HMIS Universe: Person with entries into ES, SH, TH or PH during the reporting period. Of persons above, count those who were in ES, SH, TH or any PH within 24 months prior to their entry during the reporting year. Of persons above, count those who did not have entries in ES, SH, TH or PH in the previous 24 months. (i.e. Number of persons experiencing homelessness for the first time.) 1307 1352 45 353 280-73 954 1072 118 Measure 6: Homeless Prevention and Housing Placement of Persons de ined by category 3 of HUD s Homeless De inition in CoC Programfunded Projects This Measure is not applicable to CoCs in 2016. 5/30/2017 11:00:14 AM 5

Measure 7: Successful Placement from Street Outreach and Successful Placement in or Retention of Permanent Housing Metric 7a.1 Change in exits to permanent housing destinations Universe: Persons who exit Street Outreach 0 4 4 Of persons above, those who exited to temporary & some institutional destinations Of the persons above, those who exited to permanent housing destinations 0 0 0 0 2 2 % Successful exits 50% Metric 7b.1 Change in exits to permanent housing destinations Universe: Persons in ES, SH, TH and PH-RRH who exited 1368 1222-146 Of the persons above, those who exited to permanent housing destinations 664 589-75 % Successful exits 49% 48% 0% Metric 7b.2 Change in exit to or retention of permanent housing Universe: Persons in all PH projects except PH-RRH 46 47 1 Of persons above, those who remained in applicable PH projects and those who exited to permanent housing destinations 42 44 2 % Successful exits/retention 91% 94% 2% 5/30/2017 11:00:14 AM 6