Customer Service and Operations Committee. Board Information V-D. September 10, 2015

Similar documents
MetroAccess: A Study for a Sustainable Regional Approach to Specialized Transportation

Washington Metropolitan Area Transportation Authority Board Action/Information Summary. MEAD Number: 99808

FY2017 Budget Work Session

Getting Metro Back on Track

CHAPTER 7: Financial Plan

Review FY09 Subsidy Allocation

Report by Finance and Administration Committee (B) Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary

FY2014 Operating Budget Performance Report

FY2018 Second Quarter Financial Update

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Metro Budget Overview

FY2018 Third Quarter Financial Update

FY2017 Budget Guidance

VALLEY METRO RPTA FY18 Budget EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Public Hearing on Peak Fares for Peak Service

Metro Accessibility Programs and MetroAccess Free Ride Program Customer Service, Operations and Safety Committee

Finance, Administration and Oversight Committee FY08 Budget Review Item V-C April 12, 2007 Living Wage Policy

Customer Service and Operations Committee. Board Action Item III-A. July 10, 2014

Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun

FY17 FY16 Valley Metro RPTA Sources of Funds FY17 vs FY16

Establish Reimbursable Project Regional Travel Training Initiative

State of Good Repair Review

Operating Budget. Second Quarter Financial Report

ESTIMATING THE NATIONAL ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF COORDINATED TRANSPORTATION SERVICES

~ NOTICE OF MEETING ~ CAPITAL METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING

PROPOSED FISCAL YEAR 2011 BUDGET. Testimony of. Richard Sarles, General Manager. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority.

Northern Virginia Transportation Commission: 2018 Legislative and Policy Agenda

FY2020 Budget Outlook

Economic Performance and Outlook: Washington Metro Area and Northern Virginia

FY2014 Capital and Operating Budget Discussion

FY2017 Budget Discussion

Policy on Reserve Balance for Claims

FY2013 Preliminary Operating Budget

FY06 Operating Budget. FY2006 Proposed Operating Budget. Final Summary for Board Referral

Customer Service, Operations and Security Committee. Information Item III-A. June 8, 2017

FY2011 Budget Forum. District of Columbia. October 19, 2009

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

Vision The Best Ride in the Nation

Quarterly Meeting PTD Update October 26, 2016

Funding Local Public Transportation

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary

Getting Metro Back on Track

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FINANCE/GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE INFORMATION ITEM

10 Financial Analysis

CAPITAL TRANSIT MISSION STATEMENT FY13 PROPOSED BUDGET $6,707,900 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CORE SERVICES FUNDING SOURCES FOR CAPITAL TRANSIT

Governor s FY 2016 Revised, FY 2017 and Capital Budget Recommendations House Finance Committee April 13, 2016

FY2017 Year-End Financial Update

Whatcom Transportation Authority. Annual Budget. WTA Draft Budget 1

This chapter describes the initial financial analysis and planning for the construction and operations of the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA).

Next Capital Funding Agreement

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary

Public Transportation

Greater Portland Transit District 114 Valley Street Portland ME 04102

Responses to Committee Requests

Finance & Administration Committee Information Item IV-A October 9, 2014 Momentum Update

Next Capital Funding Agreement

8. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

Proposed Budget Fiscal Year 2010 July 1, 2009 June 30, 2010

Transit Subsidy. Mission Statement. Mandates

Balancing the Transportation Needs of a Growing City

GM/CEO s Proposed FY2020 Budget

METRO. Metro Funding. Associated Master Plan: Comprehensive Master Transportation Plan (MTP) for Arlington. Neighborhood(s):

Review of WMATA FY 2006 Operating Budget. Jurisdictional Coordination Committee Thursday, May 12, 2005

SOUND TRANSIT STAFF REPORT MOTION NO. M Select a draft Sounder fare structure change and fare increase for public review and comment

Title VI Approval of Major Service Change, Disparate Impact and Disproportionate Burden

Feasibility of Using Private Operators and Independent Contractors for ADA Paratransit Services

FY2012 Preliminary Subsidy Calculation

Notice of Public Hearing Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

Transit Subsidy. Mission Statement. Mandates

Safety and Operations Committee. Information Item III-B. January 24, 2019

Solano County Transit

FY 2018 Budget Forecast Overview Joint Budget Forum

Approval to Submit TIFIA Loan Application

8.0 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

Staff Report on Public Hearing to Increase Charter Fees

Huntington Parking Garage Budget Adjustments

Evaluation of Alternative Funding Mechanisms

Title VI Fare Equity Analysis

Operating Budget. Third Quarter Financial Report (July 2005 March 2006)

Governor s FY 2019 Revised, FY 2020 and Capital Budget Recommendations House Finance Committee April 9, 2019

Whatcom Transportation Authority

Public Transportation

WAIVER TRANSPORTATION RATE STUDY METHODOLOGY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Lines of Credit Renewal

University Link LRT Extension

Travel Forecasting for Corridor Alternatives Analysis

Arlington County, Virginia

Strategic Plan Performance Metrics & Targets

Operations & Finance Committee Meeting Agenda

Overview of the Florida Transportation Disadvantaged Program

MEMORANDUM. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Board of Directors. Michael T. Burns General Manager. DATE: August 4, 2008

Whatcom Transportation Authority

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 2018 TRANSIT SUMMIT INFORMATION ITEM. Countywide

TESTIMONY OF RICHARD SARLES

2007 Legislative Program Northern Virginia Transportation Authority Approved: November 10, 2006

Item #4 FEBRUARY 10, 2015 MEETING MINUTES PG. 2 Approve the February 10, 2015 meeting minutes.

Federal Assistance 13% Charges for Services 5% Appropriated Fund Balance.5% Other 3% Administration 6% Building Maintenance 3% Other 2%

MiWay Business Plan and 2015 Budget

Transit Subsidy. Mission Statement. Mandates

Financial Report - FY 2017 Year to Date May 31, 2017

MARTA 2009 Budget Summary Review

Transcription:

Customer Service and Operations Committee Board Information V-D September 10, 2015 MetroAccess Sustainability Study Page 90 of 104

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary Action Information MEAD Number: 201651 Resolution: Yes No TITLE: MetroAccess Sustainability Study PRESENTATION SUMMARY: Dr. Terry Clower, Chair, George Mason University School of Policy, Government and International Affairs and Deputy Director for GMU s Center for Regional Analysis will provide a forecast of long term MetroAccess growth and policy actions supporting sustainable growth. PURPOSE: To provide the Customer Service and Operations Committee the results of the Board directed study on the long term sustainability of MetroAccess. DESCRIPTION: The study provides a 2025 MetroAccess service level forecast. It describes demographic factors that will shape MetroAccess growth and three forecast scenarios which are driven by regional adoption or non-adoption of coordination policies to shape MetroAccess sustainability. Eleven policies are presented for Board consideration in two distinct areas: demand/cost management and jurisdictional based services. Key Highlights: MetroAccess service levels, driven by the senior age wave will increase to 3.1 million trips/year by 2025 under current policy direction; an increase of 1 million trips and $50M in operating expense over FY2014 Regional coordination through aggressive implementation of regional policy changes can reduce 2025 service levels to 2.6 million trips An increased MetroAccess role as a major provider of human services transportation increases the forecast to 3.6 million trips Background and History: In 2010, the Board enacted policies to align MetroAccess service to Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements that require paratransit as a safety net to transit service. These policies included restricting service to the areas and times that transit service is available. In 2013 the Board amended fare policy to enable paratransit fares set at twice the fastest transit fare, also consistent with ADA policy. As a result of both Page 91 of 104

Board actions, coupled with stronger eligibility screening and increased travel training, rapid MetroAccess growth was halted and service stabilized at 2 million trips per year. Growth driven by increased enrollment has resumed at 4.6% in FY2014 and is projected to be 5.1% in FY2015. The Board requested that additional policy actions be provided for Board consideration for FY2017 budget deliberations. The report conveyed to the Board has been reviewed by the Accessibility Advisory Committee. Comments are being reviewed by staff. Discussion: The Center for Regional Analysis recommends eleven policies, in two categories to obtain MetroAccess sustainability. The categories are Demand/Cost Management and Jurisdictional Based Services. Demand/Cost Management policies implement actions in which Metro has strong coordinating role but which require local support including funding and planning coordination. Jurisdictional Based Service policies require implementation of local transportation alternatives to MetroAccess by local jurisdictions with Metro technical support. Where currently possible, Metro staff has assigned preliminary projections to the potential reduction in MetroAccess trips if a policy is fully enacted. Demand/Cost Management Policy 1: Improve accessibility of transit stops Each bus stop improved under the Board s approved goal to make 100 bus stops per year accessible attracts 100 annual trips that would have been made on MetroAccess. Over 10 years, 1,000 more accessible bus stops can deflect 100,000 MetroAccess trips per year. Priority is given to improving high value bus stops near to large numbers of MetroAccess customers. Policy 2: Expand travel training programs MetroAccess's Board approved travel training reduces reliance on MetroAccess. At current service levels, in 10 years, 2,000 MetroAccess customers will be travel trained and will result in 50,000 fewer MetroAccess trips per year. Recommendation is to maintain or increase Metro travel training service levels. The alternative is to obtain increases in travel training activity by compact members and local agencies. Policy 3: Enforce trip-by-trip eligibility for all customers Approximately 60% of MetroAccess customers are conditionally eligible and take approximately one million trips per year. If 10% of these trips can be diverted onto fixed route, there is a reduction of 100,000 MetroAccess trips per year. Staff will provide recommendations later this year for Board consideration. Policy 4: Expand reduced fare programs Similar to trip by trip eligibility, customers can elect to participate in the Board approved Reduced Fare Program instead of MetroAccess. A more aggressively marketed Page 92 of 104

Reduced Fare Program that deflects 1,000 potential MetroAccess customers per year to fixed route can also deflect 50,000 trips per year onto fixed route. Policy 5: Ensure that MetroAccess maintains ADA baselines MetroAccess requires continued Metro Board of Directors support to maintain ADA baselines. Policy 6: Monitor efficiency of MetroAccess system MetroAccess continues to administer and maintain current efficient paratransit contracts. Implement other efficiencies where possible. An example is establishment of Metro owned MetroAccess garage and parking facilities. A Metro study underway projects that it may be cost efficient to do so. Jurisdictional Based Services Policy 7: Establish regional or sub-regional one-stop shops Assumes that compact partners will develop and implement Fastran like structures which provide transportation provider information and/or human services transportation in lieu of MetroAccess service. Requires long term planning effort and regional planning coordination. Policy 8: Pursue partnerships to secure vehicles for local providers Metro is working to develop a grantee to grantee or surplus grant program that provides retiring MetroAccess vehicles to human service agencies. Alternatively, compact members could increase New Freedom funding for human service agency capital equipment. The primary goal is to enable continued operation of service by human service agencies with fleet age and shortage problems to prevent service shift to Metro. Policy 9: Encourage consolidation among individual providers Human service agencies obtain their transportation services more efficiently by coordinating their transportation operations. A consolidated provider can scale upward to be the more efficient primary provider for more than one human service agency. The incentive for human service agencies is improved service for customers. The incentive for jurisdictions is reduced expense. Metro technical support is available to support the jurisdictions. Policy 10: Provide support for expansion of jurisdictional based services These include Metro initiated and a recently concluded (Community Support Services) alternative to MetroAccess and to be implemented project (ARC of Prince George s County) in Maryland and an on-going and general purpose taxi program (Transport DC) in the District. These pilots operate at about half the cost of MetroAccess. Local funding support is necessary and can be obtained through reduced MetroAccess subsidy. Potential annual transfer is estimated at 300,000 trips per year from MetroAccess to local service. Policy 11: Coordinate with state and local governments to ensure consistency with regional policies The region benefits from a coordinated regional approach with state and local governments. Metro can assist by providing a forum in which jurisdictions can work to develop and coordinate regional policy. For example, jurisdictions could develop regional policy prohibiting addition of Medicaid customers onto MetroAccess to be Page 93 of 104

enacted at the local level. Other examples of regional policy include amending taxi regulations which currently prohibit taxi transport of MetroAccess or other customers with disabilities across county and city lines. FUNDING IMPACT: No impact on funding because those aspects of the recommendations that are already in progress have been included in the assumptions of the proposed budget as submitted. TIMELINE: Previous Actions Anticipated actions after presentation March 2014 Board commissioned staff to conduct a study, due June 2015 with subsequent actions by end of year. June 2015 Final report provided to the Board. Staff to commence work on developing full project proposals, including budget, to be provided for Board FY2017 budget consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Support policy recommendations as described herein. Page 94 of 104

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority MetroAccess Long-Term Sustainability Study Customer Service and Operations Committee September 10, 2015 Page 95 of 104

Purpose As part of the FY2015 budget approval, the Board directed staff to commission a study of the long-term sustainability of MetroAccess Mission was to examine demographics, bus stop accessibility and other ways to leverage fixed-route service, MetroAccess service delivery model and cost alternatives George Mason University s Center for Regional Analysis conducted the study as Metro s research partner Page 96 of 104

Background Following a period of unsustainable growth, MetroAccess implemented a demand management strategy (2009) Aggressive promotion of fixed-route service More robust travel training program The demand management strategy worked Three years ridership reduction, increased fixed-route use Operating expenses contained, even through award of new contracts MetroAccess also implemented a number of successful measures to reduce cost and increase efficiency Page 97 of 104

Cost Savings / Efficiency Gains Cost Savings Assumption of risk management and liability insurance function ($2M annually) Direct provision of tax-exempt fuel ($.5M annually) Direct ownership of fleet ($2M in FY2014 capital budget) New business model with multiple contractors o Competition yielded only a 2% cost increase from the previous 8-year contract Efficiency Gains New business model with separate scheduling o Productivity improved from 0.87 to 1.1 pax/hour Page 98 of 104

Current Strategy Demand management has delivered an effective, visible impact The most significant gains from this approach have already been realized 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 MetroAccess Ridership by Fiscal Year FY2003-FY2014 (000s) 1,721.7 1,468.1 1,355.9 1,253.9 1,112.4 972.4 2,107.7 2,377.2 2,336.2 2,082.9 2,126.3 2,033.4 Demand is slowly increasing again 500 0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 A combination of strategies will be necessary to ensure ongoing sustainability Source: Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority; GMU Center for Regional Analysis Page 99 of 104

Demand Management Policies Fixed-Route 1. Improve bus stop accessibility 2. Expand travel training programs 3. Expand Reduced Fare Program Paratransit 4. Enforce trip-by-trip eligibility 5. Maintain ADA service area and fare policy 6. Monitor efficiency Page 100 of 104

Jurisdictional Based Policies Jurisdictions can support MetroAccess sustainability by: 7. Regional brokerage for specialized transportation 8. Provide accessible vehicles for human service agencies to enable self-reliance 9. Encourage provider consolidation (Fastran model) 10. Support expansion of jurisdictional based services (Arlington STAR, TransportDC) 11. Regional policy alignment with local and state government Page 101 of 104

Action Plan Policy Implementation Measure Bus Stop Accessibility In Progress Board KPI: 100/year Travel Training Train-the-trainer, grant funded Stats, surveys Reduced Fare Program Expand promotion to community Usage Conditional Eligibility Phased Enforcement, FY18 Usage Service Area, Fares Maintain Usage Efficiency Last Mile Feeder Service Productivity Brokerage Concept Jurisdictional Liaisons Regional Dialogue Vehicles for HSAs Jurisdictional services and policy alignment Grantee-to-grantee transfer, proposal to FTA pending Jurisdictional Liaisons # vehicles issued Regional Dialogue and Pilot Projects Page 102 of 104

Next Steps Identify jurisdictional liaisons Metro has requested meeting with COG CAO group Metro will report annual results to the Board Page 103 of 104