Pakistan. Total MAP Caseload. Average time needed to close MAP cases (in months) n.a. n.a n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

Similar documents
New Zealand. Total MAP Caseload. Average time needed to close MAP cases (in months) n.a. n.a

Greece. Total MAP Caseload. Average time needed to close MAP cases (in months) n.a. n.a

Japan. Total MAP Caseload. Average time needed to close MAP cases (in months)

Tunisia. Total MAP Caseload. Average time needed to close MAP cases (in months) n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

Switzerland. Total MAP Caseload. Average time needed to close MAP cases (in months)

Italy end inventory 100. Milestone 1 to End. Start to Milestone

Guidance for Taxpayers on the Mutual Agreement Procedure (Q&A)

MUTUAL AGREEMENT PROCEDURE PROGRAM REPORT

Maldives Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 29 November 2018) General Information

Guide for mutual agreement procedure pursuant to tax treaties (MAP) Contents

SEC. 5. SMALL CASE PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING COMPETENT AUTHORITY ASSISTANCE.01 General.02 Small Case Standards.03 Small Case Filing Procedure

Foreign tax credit A Practical insight

SP1/11 Transfer pricing, mutual agreement procedure and arbitration

ANNEX II CHANGES TO THE UN MODEL DERIVING FROM THE REPORT ON BEPS ACTION PLAN 14

Dispute Resolution: the Mutual Agreement Procedure

SOME RELEVANT TREATY ISSUES

Bilateral Advance Pricing Agreement Guidelines

1. (1) The taxes which are the subject of this Arrangement are. The income tax (including super tax) (hereinafter referred to as Guernsey tax ).

SECTION 5. SMALL CASE PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING COMPETENT AUTHORITY ASSISTANCE.01 General.02 Small Case Standards.03 Small Case Filing Procedure

Global Transfer Pricing Review kpmg.com/gtps

PUBLIC CONSULTATION PAPER. Double Tax Conventions and the Internal Market: factual examples of double taxation cases

APPEALS & REVISIONS. PART I (For CAF-6 and ICMAP students)

Photo credits: Cover Rawpixel.com - Shutterstock.com

INFORMATION ITEMS. Week Ending August 21, 2015 REPORTS CORRESPONDENCE BOARDS & COMMITTEES ITEMS AVAILABLE IN THE CLERK S OFFICE

Income Tax Appeals. Revenue Division Federal Board of Revenue Government of Pakistan ,

What is Transfer Pricing and Why is it Important?

Mutual agreement procedure based on Swiss double taxation agreements

Photo credits: Cover Rawpixel.com - Shutterstock.com

Competent Authority Services Division International and Large Business Directorate Compliance Programs Branch Canada Revenue Agency

Contents. Introduction. International Transfer Pricing: Advance Pricing Arrangements (APAs)

Kenya Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 15 February 2018) General Information

NOTE ON DISPUTE RESOLUTION: PROPOSED NEW ARTICLE 25 COMMENTARY

New Zealand. Transfer Pricing Country Profile. Updated October The Arm s Length Principle

Revenue Procedure

Competent Authority Services Division International and Large Business Directorate Compliance Programs Branch Canada Revenue Agency

DEPARTMENTAL INTERPRETATION AND PRACTICE NOTES NO. 45 RELIEF FROM DOUBLE TAXATION DUE TO TRANSFER PRICING OR PROFIT REALLOCATION ADJUSTMENTS

Corporate Taxpayers Group

Republic of Korea Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 30 August 2017) General Information

Commissioner s Directive on the Mutual Agreement Procedure (Administrative Guidelines)

EU Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive 2: hybrid mismatches with third countries

Canada. Transfer Pricing Country Profile. Updated October The Arm s Length Principle

.02 Changes to 481(a) Spread Period for Negative 481(a) Adjustments. (1) Section 5.02(3)(a) of Rev. Proc is modified to read as follows:

Article 1 Persons Covered. Article 2 Taxes Covered

Government of Pakistan Revenue Division Federal Board of Revenue **** NOTIFICATION (Income Tax)

EUJOINTTRANSFERPRICINGFORUM PROCEDURAL IMPROVEMENTS TO THE ARBITRATION CONVENTION AND RELATED MUTUALAGREEMENT PROCEDURES

FA Fakhri Associates. Room No. 528, Price center 5 th floor, Preedy Street, Karachi &

Competent Authority Resolutions and APAs

United Kingdom/United States Dual Consolidated Loss Competent. Authority Agreement CONVENTION BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF

The Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands. And. The Government of the Isle of Man

PAKISTAN BUDGET DIGEST Income Tax. Increase in threshold of taxable income

TAXATION BAR EXAM QUESTIONS ON REAL PROPERTY TAXATION

Department of Finance Post Office Box 3278 and Administration

Hong Kong SAR Tax Profile

FIRST-NATION GOVERNMENT AND NON-NATIVE TAXPAYERS: HARMONIZING RELATIONSHIPS by Robert L. Bish University of Victoria

Japan and Chile sign income tax treaty

Increased taxpayer rights for tax dispute resolution under new EU Directive

Georgia Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 16 December 2016)

Curaçao (submitted by the Kingdom of the Netherlands on behalf of Curaçao)

OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations

2014 TAX GUIDE WHERE TO INCLUDE IN YOUR 2014 TAX RETURN FOR INDIVIDUALS (SUPPLEMENTARY SECTION)

Egypt Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 16 October 2018) General Information

EXCHANGE OF LETTERS CONCERNING

GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN REVENUE DIVISION CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE ***** No.F.4(1)ITP/2004-SAL Islamabad, July 3, 2004

The Independent State of Papua New Guinea Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: )

PORT OF SEATTLE 2017 STATUTORY BUDGET

Paraguay Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 27 June 2017)

Foreign Tax Credit. June 2016

Norway Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 30 September 2017) General Information

ADJUSTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL TAXES ACT

Release of BEPS discussion draft: Make Dispute Resolution Mechanisms More Effective

Dutch Tax Bill 2018: what will change?

Switzerland Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 1 September 2016) General Information

Bulgaria Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 16 December 2016)

Korea Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 02 April 2018) General Information

Assistance in the Collection of Taxes (Article 27) and its Commentary. Article 27 ASSISTANCE IN THE COLLECTION OF TAXES 1

Cyprus Italy Tax Treaties

National Tax Agency, Japan

The Government of the Republic of Italy and the Government of the Arab Republic of Egypt

Global Transfer Pricing Review kpmg.com/gtps

NATIONAL CENTER OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (BELARUS)

SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS/ ANSWERS FALL 2017 EXAMINATIONS 1 of 8 BUSINESS TAXATION [G5] GRADUATION LEVEL

OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project. Making Dispute Resolution More Effective MAP Peer Review Report, Spain (Stage 1)

Slovenia Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 01 May 2018) General Information

OECD Mrs Marlies de Ruiter 2, rue André Pascal Paris Cedex 16 Frankreich. Düsseldorf, 16 th January 2015

Global Transfer Pricing Review

Suncorp Easy Invest Tax Guide. for the year ended June June

tes for Guidance Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 Finance Act 2017 Edition - Part 35

Enforcement Trends and Compliance Challenges. Judicial Review : A legal challenge, towards better regulatory

APA Program Report. National Tax Agency. Office of Mutual Agreement Procedures. September 2003

APPENDIX I FORMS (6/30/03) 197

TABLE OF CONTENTS. .03 Farmers cooperatives. .01 A request made during the course of an examination

Statement of Practice on penalties for incorrect returns

Australia. Transfer Pricing Country Profile. Updated February The Arm s Length Principle

The Liège Court of First Instance in Belgium has

Re.: - Your letter No. MUM/CCIT/Coord/U-I/FTC/ /326 dated 14 th January 2013

1 Introduction Work Authorization Taxpayer Identification Numbers... 2

Switzerland Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 24 August 2018)

2005 Income and Capital Gains Tax Convention and Notes

Italy - Sri Lanka Income and Capital Tax Treaty (1984)

INTERNATIONAL ASPECTS OF AUSTRALIAN INCOME TAX

Transcription:

Pakistan 2 Total MAP Caseload Cases started before 1 January 2016 2017 start inventory Cases started Cases closed 2017 end inventory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Cases started as from 1 January 2016 2017 start inventory Cases started Cases closed 2017 end inventory 0 Start inventory on 01.01.2017 Cases started Cases closed End inventory on 31.12.2017 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Cases started before 1 January 2016 Cases started as from 1 January 2016 Average time needed to close MAP cases (in months) Cases started before 1 January 2016 Average time n.a. n.a. Cases started as from 1 January 2016 Start to End Receipt to Start Start to Milestone 1 Milestone 1 to End 2.60 1.15 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. Note: the average times to close MAP cases that started as from 1 January 2016 were computed according to the MAP statistics reporting framework available at http://www.oecd.org/tax/dispute/mutual--procedure-statistics-reportingframework.pdf Pakistan - 2017 MAP Statistics Page 1/9

Overview of MAP partners (only for cases started as from 1 January 2016) Note: the MAP cases started before 1 January 2016 and closed in 2017 are not shown in the graph. 5 4 3 2 1 1 1 n.a. 0 Treaty Partners (de minimis rule applies) Cases in 2017 start inventory + cases started in 2017 Cases closed in 2017 Cases in 2017 start inventory + cases started in 2017 Cases closed in 2017 The label "Treaty Partners (de minimis rule applies)" applies to treaty partners with which the number of cases in start inventory plus the number of cases started is at least 5. The relevant MAP statistics are aggregated under this category. Pakistan - 2017 MAP Statistics Page 2/9

MAP Outcomes 100% unilateral relief granted Cases closed by outcome denied MAP access objection is not justified withdrawn by taxpayer unilateral relief granted resolved via domestic remedy fully double taxation / fully resolving with partially double taxation / partially resolving with that there is no with no including to disagree any other outcome Total (all) 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Cases started before 1 January 2016 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cases started as from 1 January 2016 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (all) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cases started before 1 January 2016 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cases started as from 1 January 2016 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 All cases 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Pakistan - 2017 MAP Statistics Page 3/9

Annex A MAP Statistics Reporting for the 2017 Reporting Period (1 January 2017 to 31 December 2017) for Pre-2016 Cases Pakistan Row 1 category of cases denied MAP access objection is not justified withdrawn by taxpayer unilateral relief granted resolved via domestic remedy fully double taxation / fully resolving with partially double taxation / partially resolving with that there is no taxation not in with no including to disagree any other outcome Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Column 5 Column 6 Column 7 Column 8 Column 9 Column 10 Column 11 Column 12 Column 13 Column 14 Attribution/ Allocation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n.a. Row 2 Others 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n.a. Row 3 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n.a. no. of pre-2016 cases in MAP inventory on 1 January 2017 number of pre-2016 cases closed during the reporting period by outcome: no. of pre- 2016 cases remaining in on MAP inventory on 31 December 2017 average time taken (in months) for closing pre- 2016 cases during the reporting period The definition of a MAP case is where a reference is received from the Competent Authority of a country outside Pakistan under an with that country with regard to any action taken by any income-tax authority in Pakistan. and shall endeavour to arrive at a resolution of the case on unilateral basis in terms of the liberal interpretation of the legal provisions applicable. The Competent Authority of Pakistan shall entertain all such requests from the Competent Authority of a treaty partner country that are about but not limited to (a) tax demands that have arisen or are likely to arise as a result of a tax audit, assessment or re-assessment proceedings, or a tax appeal, or a review by a Commissioner of Income Tax of an assessment or re-assessment proceedings on the grounds that it is prejudicial to the interest of the revenue; (b) Withholding tax on income or other similar advance taxes that are levied under the Ordinance; and. (c) interpretation and application of any provision of the laws governing the taxes covered in the relevant treaty as applicable to the non-resident person. MAP cases are counted on the basis of number of taxpayers involved. Hence Pakistan is employing counting method. Pakistan - 2017 MAP Statistics Page 4/9

Table 1: Attribution / Allocation MAP Cases number of post-2015 cases closed during the reporting period by outcome: Treaty Partner 2015 cases in MAP inventory on 1 January 2017 2015 cases started during the reporting period denied MAP access objection is not justified withdrawn by taxpayer unilateral relief granted resolved via domestic remedy fully double taxation eliminated / fully resolving with partially double taxation / partially resolving taxation not in with that there is no with no including to disagree any other outcome 2015 cases remaining in MAP inventory on 31 December 2017 Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Column 5 Column 6 Column 7 Column 8 Column 9 Column 10 Column 11 Column 12 Column 13 Column 14 Row 2 Treaty Partners (de minimis rule applies) 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Row 3 Treaty Partners (Others) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notes Unilateral relief was granted by the other jurisdiction. Pakistan - 2017 MAP Statistics Page 5/9

denied MAP access objection is withdrawn by not justified taxpayer unilateral relief granted resolved via domestic remedy fully double taxation / fully resolving with partially double taxation / partially resolving taxation not in with that there is no with no including to disagree Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Column 5 Column 6 Column 7 Column 8 Column 9 Column 10 Column 11 Column 12 Column 13 Column 14 Row 2 Treaty Partners (de minimis rule applies) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Row 3 Treaty Partners (Others) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Treaty Partner 2015 cases in MAP inventory on 1 January 2017 2015 cases started during the reporting period Table 2: Other MAP Cases number of post-2015 cases closed during the reporting period by outcome any other outcome 2015 cases remaining in MAP inventory on 31 December 2017 Pakistan - 2017 MAP Statistics Page 6/9

"Start" to "End" Receipt of taxpayer's MAP request to "Start" "Start" to Milestone 1 Milestone 1 to "End" Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Column 5 Row 2 Treaty Partners (de minimis rule applies) 2.60 1.15 Row 3 Treaty Partners (Others) Treaty Partner Table 1: Attribution / Allocation MAP Cases average time taken (in months) for post-2015 cases from: Total Average Time 2.60 1.15 n.a. n.a. Pakistan - 2017 MAP Statistics Page 7/9

Table 2: Other MAP Cases Row 2 Row 3 Treaty Partners (de minimis rule applies) Treaty Partners (Others) "Start" to "End" Receipt of taxpayer's MAP request to "Start" "Start" to Milestone 1 Milestone 1 to "End" Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Column 5 Total Average Time n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. Treaty Partner average time taken (in months) for post-2015 cases from: Pakistan - 2017 MAP Statistics Page 8/9

"Start" to "End" Receipt of taxpayer's MAP request to "Start" "Start" to Milestone 1 Milestone 1 to "End" Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Row 1 Total Average Time 2.60 1.15 n.a. n.a. Table 3: All MAP Cases average time taken (in months) for post-2015 cases from: Pakistan - 2017 MAP Statistics Page 9/9