Anti-Tax Haven Measures to be Introduced in France

Similar documents
IRS Finalizes Regulations Relating to Allocations of Partnership Items Involving Partners That Are Look-Through Entities

Regulated Investment Companies

House and Senate Pass NOL Carryback Legislation

Real Estate Investment Trusts

Bona Fide Hedge Exemptions for Commodity Swap Dealers

Corporate Reorganizations

Tax Election to Treat Disposition of Stock of a Subsidiary as a Sale of Its Assets

UK Controlled Foreign Company Rules and Taxation of Non-UK Branches

Internal Revenue Service Directive to Examiners on Equity Swaps

UK Bank Levy. Rates and Update SUMMARY. December 13, 2010

Depositary Receipts Program Payments

Proposed Dodd-Frank Section 943 Rules

Amendments to the UK Bank Levy Regime and its Interaction with French and German Bank Levies

Reporting Requirements for Foreign Financial Accounts Including Foreign Hedge Funds and Private Equity Funds

UK Enacts Finance Act 2010 Effecting 50% Tax on Bankers Bonuses

Agencies Promulgate Final Regulations on Internet Gambling

COBRADesk Same Day Clearance

Auction Rate Preferred Stock

Court of Appeals Affirms NatWest Decisions

Money Market Fund Regulation

New York State Budget

President Obama s Fiscal Year 2012 Revenue Proposals

Creditability of Foreign Taxes

Legislation Affecting Energy Trading: Recent Developments

Proposed Treasury Exemption for Foreign Exchange Swaps and Forwards

Commercial Mortgage Modifications

SEC Exemptive Relief in Connection with Effective Date of Title VII of Dodd-Frank

Proposed Rules Under the Investment Advisers Act

Proposed Dodd-Frank Section 945 Rules

Economic Substance Doctrine: New Directive for IRS Examiners and Managers

CFTC Exemptive Relief Upon Effective Date of Title VII of Dodd-Frank

FATCA: Postponed Deadlines

Reporting Requirements for Foreign Financial Accounts

IRS Acquiesces in Xilinx Decision but only for Pre-2003 Cases

Tax Reform Bill Proposes Significant Compensation Changes

Judicial Deference to the IRS

Proposed Regulations Would Greatly Expand Reach of ERISA Fiduciary Exposure

Money Market Fund Regulation

Failed Bank Acquisitions

Most of the provisions described below will be effective for tax years beginning after 2017.

CFTC Federal Register Notice

Ongoing Uncertainty Regarding Entity Classification for UK Tax Purposes

President Obama s Fiscal Year 2012 Revenue Proposals

Implementing Workforce Reductions

IRS Replaces Proposed Regulations on Disguised Sale Rules and Allocation of Partnership Liabilities

Security-Based Swap Execution Facilities

Proposed Assessment Rate Adjustment Guidelines for Large and Highly Complex Institutions

Conflicts of Interest in Securitizations

IRS Releases Initial Guidance on the 2017 Amendments to the Internal Revenue Code s Limitation on Deduction for Certain Executive Compensation

Noncontrolling Investments in Banking Organizations

Proposed Legislation Affecting Energy Trading

Regulatory Capital Requirements

SEC Work Plan for Consideration of IFRS Adoption

CFTC Hearings on Energy Markets

German and Austrian Merger Control

New York State Paid Family Leave

Proposed Tax Extenders Legislation Would Limit Opco/Propco Spinoffs, Modify FIRPTA and Affect Treatment of REITs

Final Regulations Ease Compliance with the Loss Trafficking Rules

Clearing Exemption for Inter-Affiliate Swaps

ABS Shelf Eligibility Criteria

Corporate Expatriation Transactions

Hong Kong Rewrites Its Companies Ordinance

Regulatory Capital Requirements

JANA Master Fund, Ltd. v. CNET Networks, Inc.

Proposed Roadmap For IFRS Adoption

FDIC Proposal on Compensation Programs

Recent CFTC Issuances

Spin-Off and Listing by Introduction of Feishang Anthracite Resources Limited

U.S. Securities Litigation Against Non-U.S. Issuers by Non-U.S. Plaintiffs

Implementation of Title VII of Dodd-Frank

International Tax Cooperation

Compensation and Corporate Governance Disclosure and Proxy Solicitation

Swap Execution Facility Requirements

Amendments to the New York Non-Profit Revitalization Act

SEC Reopens Comment Period on Proposed Rules Regarding Security-Based Swaps

Tax Reform and State and Local Taxation

CFTC Proposed Rule on Energy Markets Position Limits and Hedge Exemptions

U.S. Tax Consequences of EU State Aid Recoupment

Corporate Expatriation Transactions

FATCA: Updates and Coordinating Regulations

U.S. House of Representatives Passes Comprehensive OTC Derivatives Legislation

Tax Extenders 2015 SUMMARY. December 21, 2015

New Disclosure Requirement for Derivatives Over Basket Positions That Are Controlled by the Counterparty

ERISA Fiduciary Rule. Fifth Circuit Vacates New ERISA Fiduciary Rule SUMMARY BACKGROUND. March 19, 2018

Risk-Based Bank Capital Guidelines

SEC and CFTC Adopt Product Definitions Under Title VII of Dodd-Frank

FATCA International Agreements

U.S. Tax Reform. Individual Taxation SUMMARY. January 8, 2018

ISS Publishes Guidance on Pay-for- Performance Assessments and Updates to Governance Ratings System

Brexit: U.S. Agencies Facilitate Legacy Swap Transfers

Recent Developments in New York State Tax Law Including Tax Provisions in the Recently Enacted Budget

Foreign Private Issuer Exemption from SEC Registration

CFTC Proposes to Amend CCO Rules

Joint Committee on Taxation Releases Summary of Senate Finance Committee s Tax Reform Plan

SEC Provides Relief to Security-Based Swap Dealers From Business Conduct Rules

NYSE Corporate Governance Standards

Emergency SEC Orders Concerning Short Sales

Delaware Supreme Court Rejects Bad Faith Claim Against Lyondell Board

New York s Highest Court Endorses Application of Separate Entity Rule to International Banks

CFTC Proposed Rules on Position Limits on Physical Commodity Derivatives

Transcription:

Anti-Tax Haven Measures to be Introduced in France Draft Legislation Would in Particular Impose a 50% Withholding Tax on Interest Paid in Uncooperative Jurisdictions. SUMMARY The Draft Amended Finance Bill (Projet de loi de finance rectificative pour 2009) provides that interest paid by a French tax resident outside France in jurisdictions that do not cooperate with France in respect of exchange of information would be subject to a 50% withholding tax. Such interests are currently exempt from any withholding tax under certain conditions. To date, the draft legislation does not include any grandfathering rule for loans or notes currently outstanding. It provides only for a deferred entry into force under certain conditions. In light of the gross-up provisions included in most existing loan agreements or note terms and conditions, the cost of the reform if any will effectively be borne by French borrowers or issuers. With respect to future borrowings, it is advisable that gross-up provisions as well as tax redemption clauses be modified to take into account the new legislation, if enacted. The bill also provides for the non-deductibility of interest paid to creditors established in uncooperative jurisdictions. Other anti-tax haven measures would also be enacted, as further described below. These measures are currently under discussion before the French Parliament and may be significantly amended. INTEREST PAID IN UNCOOPERATIVE JURISDICTIONS Pursuant to Section 125 A III of the French Tax Code ( FTC ), as such provision is currently applicable, interest paid by a French resident borrower to a non-french resident lender is in principle subject to an 18% withholding tax. However, Section 131 quater of the FTC provides for a very broad exemption, subject to certain conditions that are generally met by French borrowers. Such exemption also applies to lenders established in uncooperative jurisdictions. New York Washington, D.C. Los Angeles Palo Alto London Paris Frankfurt Tokyo Hong Kong Beijing Melbourne Sydney www.sullcrom.com

Under the proposed draft legislation, the scope of the withholding tax provided by Section 125 A III of the FTC would be restricted to interest paid abroad in uncooperative jurisdictions, and the rate of taxation would be increased to 50%. Accordingly, the general exemption provided by Section 131 quater of the FTC would be abolished. Uncooperative jurisdictions would be defined as jurisdictions which (i) are not Member States of the European Union, (ii) are included in the OECD grey list with respect to exchange of information and (iii) have not signed a tax information exchange agreement with France. A list of such jurisdictions will be made public and updated annually by the French Ministry of Finance. In particular, jurisdictions that have not implemented a tax information exchange agreement with France in a manner satisfactory to the French tax authorities may be added to such list. In addition, Article 238 A of the FTC would be amended so that interest and other payments made to beneficiaries that are established in uncooperative jurisdictions where the corporate income tax is lower than half the French corporate income tax would be deductible only if the payer can prove that (i) the payment is arms length and that (ii) the purpose of such payment is not to transfer funds in an uncooperative jurisdiction. The French tax administration will have to provide some guidance on the application of such conditions. This new legislation would enter into force on January 1, 2011 for loan agreements executed and notes issued before January 1, 2010, and immediately for loan agreements executed or notes issued after January 1, 2010. The non-deductibility provision will enter into force on January 1, 2011. Further inclusion of jurisdictions onto the list would only enter into force on January 1 of the year following such inclusion. a. Uncertainty on the triggering event The proposed provision refers to interest paid outside France in an uncooperative jurisdiction, irrespective of the tax residence of the beneficiary. As a result, payments made to a beneficiary resident in an uncooperative jurisdiction would not be subject to withholding tax if made in a bank account in a cooperative jurisdiction. Current drafting creates uncertainties whenever the flow of funds from the French borrower to the creditor is channeled through multiple intermediaries such as paying agents: Under a first interpretation, the withholding tax would apply to payments made directly by the borrower in uncooperative jurisdictions. The 50% withholding tax would apply only to interest paid directly by the borrower on bank accounts opened in the books of financial institutions (or branches of financial institutions) established in uncooperative jurisdictions. Accordingly, payments made through a paying agent established in a cooperative jurisdiction would not be subject to withholding tax, even if the paying agent subsequently pays such interest to the creditor in an uncooperative jurisdiction; -2-

Under a second approach, the withholding tax would apply to payments made by the borrower or on its behalf by its agents in uncooperative jurisdictions. In particular, payments made by foreign paying agents on behalf of French issuers would be subject to withholding tax if made outside France in an account opened in the books of a financial institution established in an uncooperative jurisdiction. However, it should be noted that the effective flow of funds through clearing organizations such as Clearstream, Euroclear or DTC is beyond the control of the French borrower or its paying agent. Given the practical difficulties for all parties (including the French tax administration) to have access to the relevant information, one could hope that the French tax administration would retain the first approach described above. b. Impact on the legal documentation for future borrowings Most credit agreements and most terms and conditions of notes are currently structured as follows: A gross-up clause provides that holders subject to a withholding tax are entitled to additional amounts from the borrower to make them whole; and A tax redemption clause provides that the borrower may repay the notes/loan if it has to pay additional amounts. A solution for French borrowers would be (i) to exclude the new 50% withholding tax from the scope of gross-up clauses and (ii) to include a tax redemption right vis-à-vis the holders established in an uncooperative jurisdiction to the extent interest is not deductible in France. The legal documentation could provide for the borrower the right to redeem only the notes subject to such non-deductibility while current tax redemption clauses generally provide that the tax redemption applies to all, but not less than all, the notes. Other approaches may be considered, such as selling restrictions or the mandatory payment of interest on bank accounts booked in financial institutions established in cooperative jurisdictions. OTHER ANTI-TAX HAVEN MEASURES TO BE INTRODUCED A 50% withholding tax would be imposed on dividends paid in an uncooperative jurisdiction even if the holder is resident in France for tax purposes, as from March 1, 2010; The withholding tax on fees paid in remuneration for services to a person established in an uncooperative jurisdiction would be increased to 50% under certain conditions, as from March 1, 2010 (note that the criterion is not the payment in an uncooperative jurisdiction); Dividends received from subsidiaries established in uncooperative jurisdictions would be excluded from the benefit of the French participation exemption regime, as from January 1, 2011; French CFC rules provided for by Section 209 B of the FTC would be tightened for subsidiaries established in uncooperative jurisdictions as from January 1, 2010. The draft legislation also includes an important reform with respect to transfer pricing, under which French resident companies that are part of a group realizing a turnover exceeding 400 M would have to prepare and maintain transfer pricing documentation as from January 1, 2010. -3-

LANGUAGE USED IN LOAN AGREEMENT/NOTES PROSPECTUS Under the Loi Toubon, French state-owned entities and public service entities are required to enter into agreements written in French, except for loan agreements and notes offering memorandums related to borrowings that are eligible to the withholding tax exemption provided for by Section 131 quater of the FTC. As the draft legislation contemplates to abolish Section 131 quater of the FTC, this exception will be repealed, so that certain issuers may subsequently be required to release offering memorandums and loan agreements in French. * * * Copyright Sullivan & Cromwell LLP 2009-4-

ABOUT SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP Sullivan & Cromwell LLP is a global law firm that advises on major domestic and cross-border M&A, finance and corporate transactions, significant litigation and corporate investigations, and complex regulatory, tax and estate planning matters. Founded in 1879, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP has more than 700 lawyers on four continents, with four offices in the U.S., including its headquarters in New York, three offices in Europe, two in Australia and three in Asia. CONTACTING SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP This publication is provided by Sullivan & Cromwell LLP as a service to clients and colleagues. The information contained in this publication should not be construed as legal advice. Questions regarding the matters discussed in this publication may be directed to any of our lawyers listed below, or to any other Sullivan & Cromwell LLP lawyer with whom you have consulted in the past on similar matters. If you have not received this publication directly from us, you may obtain a copy of any past or future related publications from Jennifer Rish (+1-212-558-3715; rishj@sullcrom.com) or Alison Alifano (+1-212-558-4896; alifanoa@sullcrom.com) in our New York office. CONTACTS Paris Gauthier Blanluet +33 1 7304 6810 blanluetg@sullcrom.com Nicolas de Boynes +33 1 7304 6806 deboynesn@sullcrom.com Nicolas Message +33 1 7304 5819 messagen@sullcrom.com Pierre-Antoine Bachellerie +33 1 7304 5834 bachelleriep@sullcrom.com -5- Paris:146708.v3