Government Expenditures on Defense Research and Development by the United States and Other OECD Countries: Fact Sheet

Similar documents
Global Research and Development Expenditures: Fact Sheet

Approach to Employment Injury (EI) compensation benefits in the EU and OECD

TAX POLICY CENTER BRIEFING BOOK. Background. Q. What are the sources of revenue for the federal government?

CRS Report for Congress

CHARTS MAY 23, 2017 WASHINGTON, D.C.

Recommendation of the Council on Tax Avoidance and Evasion

Burden of Taxation: International Comparisons

Declaration on Environmental Policy

Selected Charts on the Long-Term Fiscal Challenges of the United States

CHARTS MAY 10, 2018 WASHINGTON, D.C.

Switzerland and Germany top the PwC Young Workers Index in developing younger people

The Case for Fundamental Tax Reform: Overview of the Current Tax System

Statistics Brief. Investment in Inland Transport Infrastructure at Record Low. Infrastructure Investment. July

The Outlook for the U.S. Economy and the Policies of the New President

PENSIONS IN OECD COUNTRIES: INDICATORS AND DEVELOPMENTS

Australia s super system stacks up well internationally. Ross Clare, Director of Research ASFA Research and Resource Centre

See. Annual expenditure (note) 48,996 49, (0.8%) Personnel and food provisions

Statistics Brief. OECD Countries Spend 1% of GDP on Road and Rail Infrastructure on Average. Infrastructure Investment. June

Corrigendum. OECD Pensions Outlook 2012 DOI: ISBN (print) ISBN (PDF) OECD 2012

Gross Domestic Expenditures on Research and Development in Canada (GERD), and the Provinces

Financial wealth of private households worldwide

Sources of Government Revenue in the OECD, 2018

2017 Global Trends in Investor Relations

Sources of Government Revenue in the OECD, 2017

Sources of Government Revenue in the OECD, 2016

Third Revised Decision of the Council concerning National Treatment

8-Jun-06 Personal Income Top Marginal Tax Rate,

Indicator B3 How much public and private investment in education is there?

Recommendation of the Council on the Implementation of the Polluter-Pays Principle

LONG-TERM PROJECTIONS OF PUBLIC PENSION EXPENDITURE

Global Investments in R&D

Statistical annex. Sources and definitions

Investing for our Future Welfare. Peter Whiteford, ANU

UK Trade in Numbers. February 2019

Collective Bargaining in OECD and accession countries

THE PIPA/KNOWLEDGE NETWORKS POLL.

Statistics Brief. Inland transport infrastructure investment on the rise. Infrastructure Investment. August

Global Select International Select International Select Hedged Emerging Market Select

Quarterly Investment Update First Quarter 2017

Low employment among the 50+ population in Hungary

OECD HEALTH SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS SURVEY 2012

Quarterly Investment Update First Quarter 2018

Political Developments & The 2017 Tax Cut and Jobs Act

DIVERSIFICATION. Diversification

Sources of Government Revenue in the OECD, 2014

Guidance on Transfer Pricing Documentation and Country-by-Country Reporting

WHAT WOULD THE NEIGHBOURS SAY?

Study Presentation. Vice President, OPORA RUSSIA. N.I. Zolotykh. July 9, 2010.

Donor Government Funding for Family Planning in 2016

Priorities for Productivity and Income (PPIs) Country Results

Public Financial Management (PFMx) Module

Linking Education for Eurostat- OECD Countries to Other ICP Regions

BETTER POLICIES FOR A SUCCESSFUL TRANSITION TO A LOW-CARBON ECONOMY

Global Construction 2030 Expo EDIFICA 2017 Santiago Chile. 4-6 October 2017

The Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia takes part in some of the work of the OECD (agreement of 28th October 1961).

Guidance on Transfer Pricing Documentation and Country-by-Country Reporting

OECD Report Shows Tax Burdens Falling in Many OECD Countries

First Quarter Interim Management Statement. 11 April 2011

CRS Report for Congress

American healthcare: How do we measure up?

Economic Stimulus Packages and Steel: A Summary

Sources of Government Revenue across the OECD, 2015

ANNEX 2: Summary Tables

Growth in OECD Unit Labour Costs slows to 0.4% in the third quarter of 2016

Recommendation of the Council on Establishing and Implementing Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers (PRTRs)

2017/SOM3/DIA/005. GATS Plus - Services. Submitted by: Australia

July 2014 Kagiso Asset Management Quarterly

DFA Global Equity Portfolio (Class F) Quarterly Performance Report Q2 2014

ICT, knowledge and the economy 2012 Statistical annex

Assessing Developments and Prospects in the Australian Welfare State

A short history of debt

Market Briefing: S&P 500 Forward Earnings & the Economy

GLOBAL INEQUALITY AND AUSTRALIA S ROLE

Improving the quality of policymaking and government spending: A review of budgetary and regulatory instruments and the perspective of OECD countries

WHAT ARE THE FINANCIAL INCENTIVES TO INVEST IN EDUCATION?

Appendix. December 2011 Ministry of Finance

DFA Global Equity Portfolio (Class F) Performance Report Q3 2015

Household Financial Wealth By Selected Country

DFA Global Equity Portfolio (Class F) Performance Report Q2 2017

DFA Global Equity Portfolio (Class F) Performance Report Q3 2018

DFA Global Equity Portfolio (Class F) Performance Report Q4 2017

OECD Health Policy Unit. 10 June, 2001

Social Expenditure in Japan: Trends and Backgrounds

Fiscal Projections in OECD Countries: What is produced and what lessons can be learned?

Public Finance Statistics Book

Note: G20 includes only the 19 member countries (excludes European Union).

Royal United Services Institute July Osborne s Summer Surprise for Defence. Guaranteed Real-Terms Spending Increases

American healthcare: How do we measure up?

Reporting practices for domestic and total debt securities

CANADA EUROPEAN UNION

U.S. Direct Investment Abroad: Trends and Current Issues

Programme for Government Joe Reynolds Director Programme for Government and Delivering Social Change

Fiscal Policy in Japan

The FY 2011 Federal R&D Investment

This DataWatch provides current information on health spending

Ordinance on the Export, Import and Transit of Dual Use Goods, Specific Military Goods and Strategic Goods

Updates and revisions of national SUTs for the November 2013 release of the WIOD

Visa types and fees (US Dollars) Fees shown for regular service. Fees are doubled for all applications filed upon expedited service.

Macroeconomic Theory and Policy

Issue Brief for Congress

Transcription:

Government Expenditures on Defense Research and Development by the United States and Other OECD Countries: Fact Sheet Updated December 19, 2018 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45441

Background Research and development (R&D) has played a central role in the national security of the United States and its allies. R&D creates the foundation for new and improved technologies that underpin a wide range of applications. These applications include advanced weapons and systems that provide intelligence, medical treatments, and troop support. For more than 70 years, U.S. defense-related R&D has delivered breakthroughs in computing, communications, networks, satellites, fighter and bomber aircraft, aircraft carriers, submarines, tanks, tactical and strategic missiles, nuclear weapons, drones, advanced materials, autonomy, and many other weapons and technologies. Military and policy analysts broadly agree that investments in R&D can provide substantial technological advantages against potential adversaries. This fact sheet provides data on government defense R&D funding of the United States and other countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 1 Government Defense R&D Funding of OECD Members In 2016, the United States spent $78.1 billion on defense R&D, more than seven times as much on defense R&D than the rest of the OECD countries combined. Table 1 shows governmentfunded defense R&D for OECD countries in 2016. The United States spent 25 times the amount spent by the next-highest funder, South Korea; 33 times the amount spent by the United Kingdom; 70 times the amount spent by France; 73 times the amount spent by Japan; and 80 times the amount spent by Germany. OECD defense R&D is highly concentrated among a handful of countries. Since at least 2009, the United States has accounted for more than 85% of total OECD government defense R&D funding. In 2016, the U.S. share was 87.8% (see Figure 1); the top seven countries account for 98.5%. Table 1. Top Ten OECD Countries by Government Defense R&D Funding, 2016 (in millions of purchasing power parity dollars) Country R&D United States $78,094.0 South Korea 3,067.7 United Kingdom 2,325.3 France 1,117.5 Japan 1,063.4 Germany 973.9 Turkey 916.9 Australia 311.8 Canada 204.5 a Poland 177.4 Other OECD Countries 630.8 Total, OECD $88,883.1 1 The OECD is an organization of 36 countries formed after World War II to promote economic cooperation and reconstruction. Among its activities, the OECD collects, analyzes, and publishes data on each of its member countries. Congressional Research Service R45441 VERSION 2 UPDATED 1

Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Research and Development Statistics (RDS) Database, https://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?datasetcode=gbard_nabs2007. Notes: Purchasing power parity is a method of adjusting foreign currencies to a single common currency (in this case U.S. dollars) to allow for direct comparison between countries. It is intended to reflect the spending power of each local currency, rather than international exchange rates. The latest government defense R&D data for Canada, Chile, and Switzerland available from the OECD are for 2015. OECD government defense R&D data not available for Israel, Lithuania, and Portugal. a. 2015 data are the most recent available for Canada, Chile, and Switzerland. Figure 1. Share of Total OECD Government Defense R&D Funding, by Country, 2016 (in purchasing power parity terms) United States 87.8% All Others 1.5% South Korea 3.5% Turkey 1.0% United Kingdom 2.6% France 1.3% Japan 1.2% Germany 1.1% Source: OECD, RDS Database. Notes: Purchasing power parity is a method of adjusting foreign currencies to a single common currency (in this case U.S. dollars) to allow for direct comparison between countries. It is intended to reflect the spending power of each local currency, rather than international exchange rates. Includes 2015 data for Canada, Chile, and Switzerland, as 2016 data were not available. OECD government defense R&D data not available for Israel, Lithuania, and Portugal. Government Defense R&D Funding as a Share of GDP In general, countries with larger economies are able to make larger investments in R&D and defense. 2 In 2016, the United States had the largest GDP among OECD countries at $18.6 trillion, followed by Japan ($5.4 trillion), Germany ($4.0 trillion), the United Kingdom ($2.8 trillion), and France ($2.8 trillion). One approach used to facilitate comparison of government defense R&D spending among countries with different size economies is to divide each government s defense R&D spending by that country s gross domestic product (GDP). Figure 2 illustrates this metric, government defense R&D funding as a percentage of GDP, for the OECD countries ranked highest by this metric in 2016. The United States spent 0.419% of its GDP on defense R&D in 2016. The United States led in this metric, spending more than 2.5 times the share spent by South Korea (0.164%), the OECD country ranked second in this metric. Compared to the other largest OECD economies, the United States spent a much greater share of GDP on defense R&D: more than 21 times the share spent by Japan, more than 17 times the share spent by Germany (0.024%), more than 5 times the share spent by the United Kingdom (0.083%), and more than 10 times the share spent by France (0.040%). 2 For additional information on overall national spending on research and development, see CRS Report R44283, Global Research and Development Expenditures: Fact Sheet, by John F. Sargent Jr. Congressional Research Service R45441 VERSION 2 UPDATED 2

Figure 2. OECD Countries with the Highest Levels of Government Defense R&D Funding as a Share of GDP, 2016 Source: CRS analysis of OECD RDS Database data. Notes: Does not include countries with less than 0.01% government defense R&D as a share of GDP. OECD data not available for Israel, Lithuania, and Portugal. Colors assigned to countries are the same as assigned in Figure 1. Share of Government R&D Funding Spent on Defense R&D Government defense R&D spending as a share of total government R&D spending is a metric that provides an indication of the relative importance of defense R&D within each nation s R&D portfolio. Figure 3 illustrates this metric for each OECD country. In FY2016, the United States devoted 51.9% of government R&D expenditures to defense. The United Kingdom and Turkey tied for second in this metric among OECD countries at 15.9%. Among other large OECD economies, France ranked 7 th (6.4%); Japan ranked 10 th (3.1%); and Germany ranked 11 th (2.8%). Figure 3. OECD Countries with the Highest Levels of Government Defense R&D Funding as a Percentage of Total Government R&D Funding, 2016 Source: CRS analysis of OECD RDS Database data. Notes: Does not include countries that spent less than 2.0% of total government R&D spent on defense R&D. OECD data not available for Israel, Lithuania, and Portugal. Colors assigned to countries are the same as assigned in Figure 1. Congressional Research Service R45441 VERSION 2 UPDATED 3

Statistical Notes The data, table, and figures in this fact sheet are based on CRS analysis of 2016 OECD data on government budget allocations for R&D (GBARD), government budget allocations for defenserelated R&D, and gross domestic product (GDP), on a purchasing power parity basis. 3 Some caveats: The 2016 OECD data are the most recent nearly complete set of government defense R&D funding figures for OECD countries. Data for Canada, Chile, and Switzerland are based on each country s 2015 GBARD, government budget allocations for defense-related R&D, and GDP levels. In July 2016, the U.S. Office of Management and Budget adopted a refinement to the categories of R&D used by the federal government in data collection, replacing development with experimental development. This new definition more narrowly defines the set of activities to be included in R&D reporting. This change resulted in lower reported R&D funding for some agencies, including the Department of Defense. Data reported to OECD for 2016 reflected funding based on the previous definition; according to the National Science Foundation, U.S. reporting of government defense R&D funding to the OECD is expected to be based on the new definition beginning with 2018 GBARD data. According to the Office of Management and Budget, for FY2017, $26.95 billion in nonexperimental development funding at the Department of Defense, which would have been reported as R&D under the previous definition, will not be reported under the new definition. This would reduce reported U.S. defense R&D funding by about one-third. 4 Author Information John F. Sargent Jr. Specialist in Science and Technology Policy Disclaimer This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or 3 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Research and Development Statistics (RDS) Database, https://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?datasetcode=gbard_nabs2007. 4 Email communication from the Office of Management and Budget to CRS, February 4, 2018. Congressional Research Service R45441 VERSION 2 UPDATED 4

material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. Congressional Research Service R45441 VERSION 2 UPDATED 5