New Construction and Mortgage Default

Similar documents
New Construction and Mortgage Default

Loan Originations and Defaults in the Mortgage Crisis: The Role of the Middle Class. Internet Appendix. Manuel Adelino, Duke University

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. General Information Statement

Did Affordable Housing Legislation Contribute to the Subprime Securities Boom?

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. General Information Statement

The following information concerning Wells Fargo Bank s prior originations and purchases of Prime Adjustable-Rate Loans is included in this file:

Comments on Understanding the Subprime Mortgage Crisis Chris Mayer

Core Seconds S Year Fixed S Year Fixed

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. General Information Statement As of 5/1/2006

DYNAMICS OF HOUSING DEBT IN THE RECENT BOOM AND BUST. Manuel Adelino (Duke) Antoinette Schoar (MIT Sloan and NBER) Felipe Severino (Dartmouth)

Are Lemon s Sold First? Dynamic Signaling in the Mortgage Market. Online Appendix

Internet Appendix for Did Dubious Mortgage Origination Practices Distort House Prices?

Core Seconds S Year Fixed S Due-in 15 Fixed

MPF Government MBS: Document Due Diligence RHS/USDA Loans. Combined Loan-to-Value (CLTV)

ONLINE APPENDIX. The Vulnerability of Minority Homeowners in the Housing Boom and Bust. Patrick Bayer Fernando Ferreira Stephen L Ross

Expanded NMLS Mortgage Call Report Field Definitions & Instructions Effective for Q Reporting

PRODUCT MATRICES. For Information on any of our products, please contact:

PORTFOLIO ARM CLOSED END 2 ND TD. Table of Contents

The Effect of Mortgage Broker Licensing On Loan Origination Standards and Defaults: Evidence from U.S. Mortgage Market

MEGA ALT ARM (MA5/1)

1) The credit union's assets total more than $44 million as of December 31, 2017,

Memorandum. Sizing Total Exposure to Subprime and Alt-A Loans in U.S. First Mortgage Market as of

during the Financial Crisis

Residential Mortgage Credit Model

NMLS Mortgage Call Report Field Definitions & Instructions

FHA Product Overview. Product and Underwriting Guidelines. U.S. Bank Home Mortgage Wholesale Division CAT CR U.S.

HomeReady Conforming Fixed Program Summary

Understanding the subprime crisis

Things My Mortgage Broker Never Told Me: Escrow, Property Taxes, and Mortgage Delinquency

Expanded NMLS Mortgage Call Report Field Definitions & Instructions

The Untold Costs of Subprime Lending: Communities of Color in California. Carolina Reid. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.

POOLTALK USER INTERFACE GLOSSARY

Assistance Program: City of Los Angeles Low Income Purchase Assistance Program (LIPA) Zero Interest Code: DCALIPADP

Washington, D.C. Metropolitan Area Foreclosure Monitor: Technical Appendix NeighborhoodInfo DC

ORANGE COUNTY HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY HOMEOWNER MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS (Multi-County Program) 2014 PROGRAM NOTICE

Credit-Induced Boom and Bust

Washington, D.C. Metropolitan Area Foreclosure Monitor: Technical Appendix

MAGNOLIA BANK CORRESPONDENT FUNDING RURAL DEVELOPMENT PRODUCT SUMMARY

RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION LENDING POLICY

FHA Underwriting Changes. Effective for case numbers issued on and after September 14, 2015

A Nation of Renters? Promoting Homeownership Post-Crisis. Roberto G. Quercia Kevin A. Park

FNMA Home Affordable Refinance Program (HARP) Transaction Type Number of Units Fixed Rate Max LTV/CLTV

PRODUCT MATRICES. For Information on any of our products, please contact your USBHM Account Executive

JUMBO PRIME PROGRAM JUMBO PRIME PROGRAM

Mortgage Terms Glossary

TEACHERS RETIREMENT BOARD INVESTMENT COMMITTEE. SUBJECT: Home Loan Program 2012 Mid-Year Report CONSENT: X ATTACHMENT(S): 1

20 Hour SAFE Comprehensive: Financing Residential Real Estate

Issue Date 2/18/09 Effective Date Immediately WPA

Stockton Mortgage Funding HomeReady Fixed Rate Mortgage Product

MPF Government MBS: Document Due Diligence VA Loans. Combined Loan-to-Value (CLTV)

Qualified Residential Mortgage: Background Data Analysis on Credit Risk Retention 1 AUGUST 2013

What s New in Mortgage Lending Compliance?

Current Mortgage Performance Observations. January 31, 2009 Performance Data Prepared as of February 20, 2009

CHAPTER 14 - FINANCE I. INTRODUCTION FINANCING INSTRUMENTS A. THE DEMAND FOR LOANS. BORROWERS INCLUDE: B. THE SUPPLY OF MONEY FOR LOANS.

The subprime lending boom increased the ability of many Americans to get

What do HMDA Rule Changes Mean for Covered Institutions?

ditech BUSINESS LENDING HOMEREADY MORTGAGE PRODUCT

Information Asymmetry in Private-Label Mortgage Securitization: Evidence from Allocations to Aliated Funds.

6/18/2015. Residential Mortgage Types and Borrower Decisions. Role of the secondary market Mortgage types:

JUMBO PRODUCT MATRIX

Printable Lesson Materials

Chapter 15 Real Estate Financing: Practice

20 Hour SAFE Comprehensive: Financing Residential Real Estate

Foreclosure Delay and Consumer Credit Performance

Announcement March 5, Updates and Clarifications for Streamlined Refinance Products

PRODUCT MATRIX 3/15/07

Household Debt and Defaults from 2000 to 2010: The Credit Supply View

EverBank Wholesale Lending

Jumbo Non-Conforming Products (Series-49)

Chapter 14. The Mortgage Markets. Chapter Preview

An Overview of the Housing Finance System in the United States

Lunchtime Data Talk. Housing Finance Policy Center. Mortgage Origination Pricing and Volume: More than You Ever Wanted to Know

PennyMac Correspondent Group Open Access

Fannie Mae 2010 First Quarter Credit Supplement. May 10, 2010

Bruce Tuckman, Angel Serrat, Fixed Income Securities: Tools for Today s Markets, 3rd Edition

Challenges and Opportunities for Low Downpayment Lending

REFERENCE POOL DISCLOSURE FILE

Sponsor-Underwriter Affiliation and Performance in Non-Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities

2018 HMDA Implementation. Presented By: Karen Ruckle, Director of Compliance Bank of the Ozarks

HOMEOWNERSHIP ASSISTANCE PROGRAM SUMMARY

Financing Residential Real Estate. Conventional Financing

Regulating Household Leverage

Washington, D.C., Metropolitan Area Foreclosure Monitor Technical Appendix NeighborhoodInfo DC April 2010

Summary of Reportable HMDA Data Regulatory Reference Chart a

SUPER JUMBO PRIMARY RESIDENCE. Min FICO. SFR, Condo* Townhouse PUD, 2 Units. Min FICO. SFR, Condo, Townhouse, PUD, 2 Units SECOND HOMES.

VA FULLY AMORTIZING FIXED, HIGH BALANCE & JUMBO PROGRAM

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System; Truth in Lending

Update On Mortgage Originations, Delinquency and Foreclosures In Maryland

PRODUCT GUIDELINES USBHM CONVENTIONAL NON-CONFORMING FIXED 30 YEAR YEAR YEAR 3777 Core Portfolio Revised 01/02/18

Assistance Program: City of Tuscaloosa Home Purchase Assistance Program Code: DALTUSHPP

Risky Borrowers or Risky Mortgages?

VA FULLY AMORTIZING FIXED, HIGH BALANCE & JUMBO PROGRAM

Construction Mortgage Loans

Overview of Mortgage Lending

Mortgage Market Statistical Annual 2017 Yearbook. Table of Contents

Special Feature Codes

M E M O R A N D U M Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission

Assistance Program: Hernando County SHIP Down Payment Assistance Program Code: DFLHCSHIP

1. Modification algorithm

Fannie Mae 2009 First Quarter Credit Supplement. May 8, 2009

Transcription:

New Construction and Mortgage Default ASSA/AREUEA Conference January 6 th, 2019 Tom Mayock UNC Charlotte Office of the Comptroller of the Currency tmayock@uncc.edu Konstantinos Tzioumis ALBA Business School American College of Greece ktzioumis@alba.acg.edu The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency or the U.S. Department of the Treasury.

Motivation and Research Question Motivation There is reason to expect new homes relative to existing construction to depreciate more quickly (or appreciate less quickly) than existing construction. This implies that, all else equal, equity will be lower following origination for loans used to buy new homes. L 0 Vt=0 New L s Vt=s New = > L 0 V Existing t=0 L s Vt=s Existing

Motivation and Research Question Motivation Under both the double trigger and strategic models of mortgage default L s L s Vt=s New > Vt=s Existing Pr[Default New Construction] > Pr[Default Existing Construction] Research Question All else equal, are purchase loans used to buy new construction more likely to default than purchase loans used to buy existing homes?

Why Might New Homes Depreciate More Quickly? Location Risk Many newly constructed homes are located in newly created subdivisions. Especially early in the development process, there is significant risk that the subdivision is not completed or that promised amenities are not delivered by the developer. If the market s perception of the viability of the development falls, the values of the newly purchased units could fall significantly. No one wants to live in a zombie subdivision.

Why Might New Homes Depreciate More Quickly? The New Home Premium Buyers might be willing to pay a premium for newness (Coulson, Morris, and Neill, Real Estate Economics, 2016). A new home premium implies that a home s value depreciates sharply as it transitions from new to existing status. Car depreciates the second you drive it off the lot. Home value drops the second you walk in. Could be driven by buyers paying a premium for customization.

Why Might New Homes Depreciate More Quickly? Bargaining Power Many new homes are sold by builders that have extensive experience negotiating real estate deals. Builders with many properties in the local market also have very strong incentives to avoid dropping prices. Home buyers and non-builder home sellers typically less experienced in real estate negotiations. Buyers have a better chance of getting a good deal on existing construction. Buyers of existing construction accumulate equity more quickly.

Why Might New Homes Depreciate More Quickly? Appraisals New construction is more difficult to appraiser especially in new developments because there are few/no comparable sales that can be used to construct a valuation. Very little information on price discovery. Because of these issues, appraisers often use the cost approach which is based on estimates of reconstructing the home in lieu of the market approach, which relies upon comparable sales. Appraisals may be even less likely to serve as a restraint on overpaying for a property when the property is new construction.

Preview of Results Using loan-level data on more than 3 million purchase mortgages originated between 2004 and 2009, we find that The unconditional default rate for loans used to purchase new construction was 5.6 percentage points higher than the default rate for loans used to purchase existing construction. A significant fraction of the difference in unconditional default rates can be explained by where and when new construction occurs. Controlling for a rich set of borrower and loan characeristics, loans for new homes were 1.8 percentage points more likely to default. Loans for new construction are more likely to default in both boom and bust periods. Models that treat the new construction variable as endogenous suggest that mortgages for new construction are between 4.6 and 14.2 percentage points more likely to default.

Loan information used to identify subordinate liens ( piggyback loans ) to get a more accurate assessment of a borrower s equity position in the property at the time of origination Background Data Methodology Results Conclusion Data Sources DataQuick Property Data Reports transfers and mortgage activity for approximately 150 million properties in the U.S. Data fields include Property location Property type (e.g., single-family units) Loan amount Structural characteristics Year in which the property was built A home is classified as new if the house was between zero and one year old at the time of origination. Geographic coordinates used to assign properties to Census tracts

Data Sources Mortgage Performance Data Extended OCC Mortgage Metrics Data Loan-level database for mortgage servicers under OCC supervision Comprised of loans from across the credit and investor spectrum (FNMA, FHLMC, GNMA, portfolio, PLMBS) Private-Label MBS (PLMBS) Data Comprised of loans securitized into private-label mortgage-backed securities Primarily subprime, Alt-A, and jumbo loans

Data Sources Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) Data Near universe of first-lien loan applications (approved and denied) in the U.S. Data fields include Loan amount, close date, purpose, and type Property Census tract Buyer income Buyer race/ethnicity

Data Sources Mortgage Performance Data Mortgage Metrics and PLMBS both contain Monthly delinquency status Loan underwriting characteristics (e.g., DTI, FICO, CLTV) Mortgage contract characteristics Data restricted to loans originated between 2004 and 2009 Data also restricted to single-family residences and state-years where our data covered at least 10 percent of the home-purchase originations for 1-4 family dwellings in HMDA. All data fields standardized between Mortgage Metrics and PLMBS Loans followed for 4 years following origination Loan classified as being in default if the loan was reported as being in any stage of the foreclosure process or being at least 90 days-past-due in the 4 years following origination

Data Sources Final Product Mortgage Metrics and PLMBS data combined and then deduped using a unique transaction identifier Loans then merged with DataQuick and HMDA files using fields common in all files Final Product A unique database of more than 3 million purchase loans originated between 2004 and 2009 that contains detailed information on: the nature of the mortgage contract; the creditworthiness of the borrower; monthly loan performance; the location of the property securing the mortgage; and the age of the property at the time the loan was originated.

Summary Statistics Loan Types No New Existing Default Default Construction Home Total Observations 613,382 2,816,447 547,593 2,882,236 3,429,829 Default Rate 1.00 0.00 0.23 0.17 0.18 New Construction 0.20 0.15 1.00 0.00 0.16 Balloon Payment 0.07 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 Full Documentation 0.50 0.61 0.52 0.60 0.59 Interest Only 0.30 0.15 0.22 0.17 0.18 Option ARM 0.07 0.04 0.05 0.04 0.05 Owner Occupied 0.88 0.85 0.87 0.85 0.86 Piggyback Loan 0.45 0.26 0.33 0.29 0.29 Prepayment Penalty 0.33 0.09 0.14 0.13 0.13 FHA 0.16 0.16 0.13 0.17 0.16 VA 0.02 0.04 0.05 0.04 0.04 Term>30 Years 0.12 0.02 0.04 0.03 0.04 CLTV 94.30 86.38 87.58 87.84 87.80 CLTV> 99 0.46 0.21 0.27 0.25 0.26 FICO 668.47 718.20 707.94 709.57 709.31 Back-end DTI 40.05 36.51 37.89 36.97 37.12

Fixed Effects Models Delinq ijt = α 0jt + α 1 New i + κ X i + ɛ ijt (1) Delinq ijt : a dummy variable indicating whether the loan was ever least 90 days past due (90+DPD) or worse or entered the foreclosure process within the first 48 months after origination. i: indexes the purchase loans in our sample. New i : denotes a new home sale, namely sales where the age of the house is either zero or one. α 0jt : denotes a geography-by-origination-year fixed effect. We alternatively define our fixed effects at the county-origination-year and Census-tract-origination-year level. X i : Vector of borrower and loan characteristics.

Instrumental Variables Models If unobservables that vary within the fixed effect level are correlated with the new home indicator, then our fixed effects models are biased. Construct a Bartik-style shift-share instrument and estimate instrumental variables model where new home variable is treated as endogenous. Instrument constructed using arm s length sales of single-family homes as reported in the public records data.

Instrumental Variables Models Instrumental Variable Construction for Census Tract j 1 Calculate fraction of new home sales in tract j in 2004. 2 Use home sale records to count number of new and existing homes in Census tract j in year t. 3 Construct similar counts at the state level. 4 Remove tract-level sales from state-level sales series. 5 Use net-of-tract state-level sales data to create estimate of fraction of new home sales in tract j in 2005. 6 Use net-of-tract state-level data to update value created in step 5 to get estimate of fraction of new home sales in tract j in 2006. Repeat for years 2005-2009.

Fixed Effects Models: Pooled Sample Dependent Variable: Loan Defaults in 48 Months Following Origination Specification Coefficient (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) New Construction 0.0555*** 0.0386*** 0.0424*** 0.0256*** 0.0175*** (0.00786) (0.00702) (0.00543) (0.00202) (0.00180) Year FEs? No Yes Yes No No County-Year FEs? No No No Yes No Tract-Year FEs? No No No No Yes Controls? No No Yes Yes Yes Observations 3,429,829 3,429,829 3,429,829 3,429,829 3,429,829

Fixed Effects Models: Year-By-Year Dependent Variable: Loan Defaults in 48 Months Following Origination Origination Year Coefficient 2004 2005 2006 New Construction 0.00427** -0.00144 0.0214*** (0.00168) (0.00298) (0.00300) Default Rate 0.0672 0.1710 0.3020 Observations 472,864 776,257 726,067 Origination Year Coefficient 2007 2008 2009 New Construction 0.0316*** 0.0349*** 0.0182*** (0.00270) (0.00321) (0.00275) Default Rate 0.2430 0.1370 0.0687 Observations 558,590 465,302 430,749 Tract-Year FEs? Yes Yes Yes Controls? Yes Yes Yes

Instrumental Variables Models Dependent Variable: Loan Defaults in 48 Months Following Origination Specification Coefficient (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) New Construction 0.0606*** 0.1418*** 0.0812*** 0.0855*** 0.0463*** (0.0090) (0.0327) (0.0313) (0.0221) (0.0091) First-Stage F Statistic - 597.62 578.14 597.52 556.75 Endogeneity Test Statistic - 7.06*** 2.02 4.94** 3.83** Model Includes Controls? No No No Yes Yes Year FEs? No No No Yes No County-Year FEs? No No No No Yes Observations 2,941,014 2,941,014 2,941,014 2,941,014 2,941,014

Conclusion Mortgages backed by new homes are unconditionally and conditionally more likely to experience default. Results holds true in both boom and bust years. Estimated performance differences are economically significant (between 1.8 and 14.2 percentage points depending on the model specification). Because new home buyers were typically prime borrowers, our findings also contribute to the literature that explores the role of prime borrowers in the mortgage crisis (e.g., Ferreira and Gyourko (2015) and Adelino, Schoar, and Severino (2016)).

Conclusion Thank You! Tom Mayock UNC Charlotte Office of the Comptroller of the Currency tmayock@uncc.edu Konstantinos Tzioumis ALBA Business School American College of Greece ktzioumis@alba.acg.edu

Dependent Variable: Loan Defaults in 48 Months Following Origination Specification Coefficient (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) New Construction 0.0555*** 0.0386*** 0.0424*** 0.0256*** 0.0175*** (0.00786) (0.00702) (0.00543) (0.00202) (0.00180) Term>30 Years 0.305*** 0.205*** 0.186*** (0.00660) (0.00456) (0.00519) Piggyback Loan -0.0137*** -0.0138*** -0.00737*** (0.00329) (0.00159) (0.00153) Prepayment Penalty 0.129*** 0.109*** 0.0988*** (0.00498) (0.00376) (0.00344) Option ARM 0.0555*** 0.0181*** 0.0197*** (0.00629) (0.00450) (0.00448) Interest Only 0.108*** 0.0516*** 0.0542*** (0.00779) (0.00329) (0.00298) Full Documentation -0.0614*** -0.0447*** -0.0419*** (0.00376) (0.00187) (0.00181) Fixed Rate 0.0102** -0.0169*** -0.0173*** (0.00449) (0.00224) (0.00191) Owner Occupied -0.0260*** -0.0219*** -0.0115*** (0.00325) (0.00283) (0.00201) Balloon Payment 0.0297*** 0.0127*** 0.00859*** (0.00486) (0.00273) (0.00280) (0.00460) (0.00446) (0.00389) FHA -0.0319*** -0.0319*** -0.0283*** (0.00396) (0.00314) (0.00255) VA -0.144*** -0.132*** -0.119*** (0.00709) (0.00534) (0.00451) Back-end DTI (DTI) 0.00183*** 0.000902*** 0.000841*** (8.18e-05) (4.62e-05) (4.90e-05) DTI Missing 0.0133*** 0.00929** 0.00672 (0.00428) (0.00400) (0.00423) Year FEs? No Yes Yes No No County-Year FEs? No No No Yes No Tract-Year FEs? No No No No Yes Observations 3,429,829 3,429,829 3,429,829 3,429,829 3,429,829

Dependent Variable: Loan Defaults in 48 Months Following Origination Specification Coefficient (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) CLTV Buckets 70 < CLTV 80 0.0216*** 0.0290*** 0.0263*** (0.00199) (0.00252) (0.00255) 80 < CLTV 90 0.0809*** 0.0869*** 0.0765*** (0.00459) (0.00507) (0.00504) 90 < CLTV 99 0.109*** 0.123*** 0.110*** (0.00579) (0.00635) (0.00588) CLTV > 99 0.191*** 0.198*** 0.175*** (0.00955) (0.00927) (0.00796) FICO Buckets 620 < FICO 659-0.0988*** -0.106*** -0.100*** (0.00502) (0.00467) (0.00430) 659 < FICO 719-0.187*** -0.193*** -0.183*** (0.00647) (0.00626) (0.00576) 719 < FICO 769-0.251*** -0.253*** -0.238*** (0.00564) (0.00567) (0.00510) FICO > 769-0.274*** -0.279*** -0.260*** (0.00460) (0.00446) (0.00389) FHA -0.0319*** -0.0319*** -0.0283*** (0.00396) (0.00314) (0.00255) VA -0.144*** -0.132*** -0.119*** (0.00709) (0.00534) (0.00451) Back-end DTI (DTI) 0.00183*** 0.000902*** 0.000841*** (8.18e-05) (4.62e-05) (4.90e-05) DTI Missing 0.0133*** 0.00929** 0.00672 (0.00428) (0.00400) (0.00423) Year FEs? No Yes No No No County-Year FEs? No No No Yes No Tract-Year FEs? No No No No Yes Observations 3,429,829 3,429,829 3,429,829 3,429,829 3,429,829