PROJECT NAME IMPACT Impact Indicator 1 B (04/14) M1 (04/15) T (04/16) Sustainable improvement in the lives of poor and vulnerable groups by achieving progress in 2 Millennium Development Goals: 1. Reduced poverty (MDG #1) 2. Increased women's empowerment (MDG #3) CARE International UK PPA (2014-2016 extension) - Accompanying Logframe. Poverty headcount ratio at $1.25 a day (PPP) (% of population) Planned 37.69% 36.75% 35.81% Achieved 35.00% Impact Indicator 2 B (04/14) M1 (04/15) T (04/16) Gender Inequality Index Score World Bank Statistics (www.worldbank.org/data). 1 Planned 0.56 0.546 0.532 Achieved 0.543 Gender Inequality Index (UNDP). 2 OUTCOME Outcome Indicator 1.1 B (04/11) M1 (04/12) M2 (04/13) T1 (04/14) M3 (04/15) T2 (04/16) Assumptions Improved impact on poverty and women's empowerment through adoption and wider take-up of CARE's identified good practices in four sectors: 1. Private Sector Engagement 2. Governance 3. Climate Change Adaptation 4. Conflict and Peacebuilding # of instances in which identified good practice is reflected in development policy 3 Planned 0 0 7 18 24 30 Achieved 6 13 19 23 Government white papers, speeches by senior developmental officials, donor strategies and policies, peer agency workplans and policies, research studies. 6 Outcome Indicator 1.2 B (04/11) M1 (04/12) M2 (04/13) T1 (04/14) M3 (04/15) T2 (04/16) # of new funding sources leveraged for investment in innovative development models 4 Planned 0 0 7 13 15 19 Achieved 4 6 10 15 Funding proposals and contracts, annual reports, etc. 6 There are opportunities to influence policy-making processes through CARE's identified good practices in four sectors,and policy change on issues related to utilisation of PPA funding occurs during the lifetime of the PPA grant. CARE's innovative PPAsupported models can be adapted and replicated in other country and/or regional contexts faced with similar challenges. Conditions remain stable and risks can be mitigated in PPA countries. CIUK PPA 2014-16 Extension Logframe. Page 1 of 18 Jul 2015
OUTPUT 1 Output Indicator 1.1 B (04/14) M1 (04/15) T (04/16) Assumptions # of pilot initiatives Planned 8 11 16 supported with PPA Achieved 12 funds Innovative programming practices are piloted, tested and reviewed to generate learning and identify good practice Output Indicator 1.2 B (04/11) M1 (04/12) M2 (04/13) T1 (04/14) M3 (04/15) T2 (04/16) # of internal reflection and learning meetings held Documentation of pilots with beneficiaries, partners & programme staff. Planned 0 0 17 28 38 48 Achieved 2 19 30 40 Documentation of meetings with beneficiaries, partners & programme staff. Output Indicator 1.3 B (04/11) M1 (04/12) M2 (04/13) T1 (04/14) M3 (04/15) T2 (04/16) # of learning studies Planned 0 0 27 42 52 65 which identify clear recommendations to Achieved 9 21 39 50 improve models Innovative PPA-supported models are more successful in delivering effective and costefficient change than conventional development models. There are sufficient and sustained PPAcomplementing funding sources to support CARE s innovative programming throughout the lifetime of the PPA grant. Conditions remain stable and risks can be mitigated in PPA countries. IMPACT WEIGHTING (%) 33% Studies; Available internal action plans developed in response to recommendations. RISK RATING Low and Medium depending on country context INPUTS (HR) DFID (FTEs) OUTPUT 2 Output Indicator 2.1 B (04/14) M1 (04/15) T (04/16) Assumptions CARE's capacity is Planned 0 25 50 developed to apply Achieved 25 identified good practices and promote practice for adoption by external CIUK technical advisor reporting forms; Recipient COs feedback forms. stakeholders # and description of instances in which PPA-supported technical assistance to apply good practices in identified priority themes is provided and valued by COs Output Indicator 2.2 B (04/14) M1 (04/15) T (04/16) # of CARE country offices supported to develop national advocacy strategies Planned 0 2 3 Achieved 2 There is political will and space for citizens and civil society to associate, selforganize and engage effectively in policy and programme processes in PPA countries and at regional and global level. Conditions to apply/promote good practices remain stable and risks can be mitigated in PPA countries. CIUK PPA 2014-16 Extension Logframe. Page 2 of 18 Jul 2015
IMPACT WEIGHTING (%) 33% advocacy strategies CIUK technical advisor reporting forms; country office advocacy strategy documents. RISK RATING Low INPUTS ( ) INPUTS (HR) DFID ( ) Govt ( ) Other ( ) Total ( ) DFID SHARE (%) DFID (FTEs) CIUK PPA 2014-16 Extension Logframe. Page 3 of 18 Jul 2015
OUTPUT 3 Output Indicator 3.1 B (04/11) M1 (04/12) M2 (04/13) T1 (04/14) M3 (04/15) T2 (04/16) Assumptions Identified good practice is # of CARE and promoted among external stakeholders development actors downloading and through policy engagement. receiving good practice studies Planned 0 0 4,000 5,000 7,500 9,000 Achieved 1,471 4,100 5,805 8,322 Webstats, Mailing lists, feedback forms. CARE's identified good practices are not organisationspecific and have potential application by other development actors. Output Indicator 3.2 B (04/11) M1 (04/12) M2 (04/13) T1 (04/14) M3 (04/15) T2 (04/16) IMPACT WEIGHTING (%) 33% INPUTS ( ) INPUTS (HR) # of workshops or public events at which CARE presents its findings to international or national development actors Planned 0 0 21 33 43 60 Achieved 6 21 37 51 Documentation of events, attendance lists. DFID ( ) Govt ( ) Other ( ) Total ( ) DFID SHARE (%) DFID (FTEs) RISK RATING Low CIUK PPA 2014-16 Extension Logframe. Page 4 of 18 Jul 2015
Annex 1: Endnotes Endnotes 1. Target based on average of CIUK priority countries (Afghanistan, Bangladesh, DRC, Ethiopia, India, Kenya, Pakistan, Peru, Rwanda, South Sudan, Zimbabwe) assuming an average 5% decrease per country by end of PPA (2016). 2. Target based on average, assuming individual CIUK priority countries improve gender inequality scores by an average of 5% per country by end of PPA (ie. GII scores decrease). 3. Instances: For the purposes of this indicator, an "instance" will be counted if it displays the following characteristics: a. There is clear evidence of the good practice being reflected in the policy of a development actor. These may include governments, donors, academic or operational organisations. Different institutions of the same actor may be included if they operate independently. For example, instances of adoption by a regional government may be included alongside a national government of the same country. Evidence may be drawn from a range of sources, including government white papers, speeches by senior developmental officials, donor strategy and policy documents, peer agency workplans or policies, testimony by development practitioners, etc. b. There is some evidence of a causal link between CARE s work and the good practice being reflected in development policy. This evidence may not be absolute but it should be reasonable to conclude that CARE contributed to the take-up of the good practice. c. There is a clear link with the PPA, either because the good practice was identified with PPA support, or because it was shared and promoted with PPA support. Multiple forms of PPA support are possible, such as direct funding or contributions to salaries or travel costs of key staff members. Good Practice: Good practice is defined as evidence-based findings or recommendations in the specified sectors which, if implemented by CARE and/or other development actors, are likely to improve poverty reduction or women's empowerment outcomes. 4. Innovation refers to programming practice which is being tested by CARE before being scaled up more broadly. Innovation may refer to programming practice which is relatively new to the operating context, to CARE, or to the development sector as a whole. An example of innovation being supported by the PPA grant is linking community-based savings groups to formal financial institutions in partnership with mobile network operators. 5. Tentative baseline based on 2012/2013 reporting for similar indicator. Baseline figure will be finalised based on reporting for FY2014. 6. s will be triangulated with testimony from key individuals where possible and practical. CIUK PPA 2014-16 Extension Logframe. Page 5 of 18 Jul 2015
Annex 2: Impact indicator baseline calulations - disaggregated by country. Poverty headcount ratio at $1.25 a day (PPP) (% of population) Country Name Data relates to year: Baseline 2016 Target (Updated 09/13) Gender Inequality Index Baseline Data relates to year: Data 2013 2016 Target (Updated 09/13) CIUK PPA 2014-16 Extension Logframe. Page 6 of 18 Jul 2015
Afghanistan N/A N/A N/A Afghanistan 0.712 2012 0.705 0.6764 CIUK PPA 2014-16 Extension Logframe. Page 7 of 18 Jul 2015
Bangladesh 2010 43.25 41.09 Bangladesh 0.518 2012 0.529 0.492 CIUK PPA 2014-16 Extension Logframe. Page 8 of 18 Jul 2015
DRC 2006 87.70 83.32 DRC 0.681 2012 0.669 0.647 CIUK PPA 2014-16 Extension Logframe. Page 9 of 18 Jul 2015
Ethiopia 2005 39.00 37.05 Ethiopia N/A N/A 0.547 N/A CIUK PPA 2014-16 Extension Logframe. Page 10 of 18 Jul 2015
India 2010 32.70 31.07 India 0.61 2012 0.563 0.58 CIUK PPA 2014-16 Extension Logframe. Page 11 of 18 Jul 2015
Kenya 2005 43.40 41.23 Kenya 0.608 2012 0.548 0.578 CIUK PPA 2014-16 Extension Logframe. Page 12 of 18 Jul 2015
Pakistan 2008 21.00 19.95 Pakistan 0.567 2012 0.563 0.539 CIUK PPA 2014-16 Extension Logframe. Page 13 of 18 Jul 2015
Peru 2010 4.91 4.66 Peru 0.387 2012 0.387 0.368 CIUK PPA 2014-16 Extension Logframe. Page 14 of 18 Jul 2015
Rwanda 2011 63.17 60.01 Rwanda 0.414 2012 0.41 0.393 CIUK PPA 2014-16 Extension Logframe. Page 15 of 18 Jul 2015
South Sudan 2010 4.11 3.90 South Sudan N/A N/A N/A N/A CIUK PPA 2014-16 Extension Logframe. Page 16 of 18 Jul 2015
Zimbabwe N/A N/A N/A Zimbabwe 0.544 2012 0.516 0.517 CIUK PPA 2014-16 Extension Logframe. Page 17 of 18 Jul 2015
Average 37.69 35.81 Average 0.560 0.543 0.532 CIUK PPA 2014-16 Extension Logframe. Page 18 of 18 Jul 2015