BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

Similar documents
BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

Safety Target Meeting Summary 10/3/2017

BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

Intergovernmental Agreement Between Illinois Department of Transportation, DMATS Metropolitan Planning Organization and JULE Transit Provider

Draft Memorandum for the Record Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization Unified Planning Work Program Committee Meeting Summary

MEMORANDUM. June 21, 2018 Boston Region MPO Sandy Johnston, UPWP Manager Proposed Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2018 UPWP Amendment 1

MEMORANDUM. June 21, 2018 Boston Region MPO Sandy Johnston, UPWP Manager Proposed Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2018 UPWP Amendment 1

Additionally, the UPWP serves as a source for the following information:

Metropolitan Planning Organizations in North Carolina. Chris Lukasina NCAMPO

Performance-Based Planning and Programming Why Is It Important? Northwest TTAP and BIA Symposium Portland, OR March 17, 2015

JACKSONVILLE URBAN AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM AMENDMENT 1 FISCAL YEAR 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING PROCEDURES FOR STIP AND TIP MODIFICATIONS

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Pennsylvania Department of Transportation s Statewide Procedures for STIP and TIP Modifications

FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Lehigh Valley Transportation Study s Procedures for Transportation Improvement Program Revisions

MassDOT Highway ACEC State Markets Conference April 5, Jonathan Gulliver, Highway Administrator John J. Bechard, P.E., Deputy Chief Engineer

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Lehigh Valley Transportation Study's Procedures for TIP M odifications

Pennsylvania Department of Transportation s Statewide Procedures for STIP and TIP Revisions

2045 Long Range Transportation

INVESTMENT STRATEGIES

House Bill 20 Implementation. House Select Committee on Transportation Planning Tuesday, August 30, 2016, 1:00 P.M. Capitol Extension E2.

PENNSYLVANIA S 2017 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM FINANCIAL GUIDANCE

TRACKER. Mid-Year Update Fiscal Year 2017

COMPONENT 4. programming may differ from what is included in this chapter.

Program (TIP) to add a new Section 5310 transit project for the Jonesborough Senior Center s vehicle purchase Resolution (Vote Required)

2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION

Vaidila Satvika moved to approve the Consent Agenda and the Agenda as presented. Dan Baechtold seconded and the motion carried as all were in favor.

10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan DRAFT

Approved by the Roanoke Valley-Alleghany Regional Commission April 25, 2013

ALL Counties. ALL Districts

MADISON ATHENS-CLARKE OCONEE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION STUDY UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM FY

Regional Equity Analysis Of Current Funding (Highway STIP and CIP) Project Selection Advisory (PSA) Council

ANNUAL PERFORMANCE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT

Georgia Department of Audits and Accounts Performance Audit Division

SFY 2018 (July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018) Annual Report

FY2018 UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM (UPWP)

FY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Technical Memorandum. Finance. Prepared for: Prepared by: In cooperation with: High Street Consulting Group

Target Formula Re-evaluation

Transportation Planning in the Denver Region

10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan DRAFT

Memphis and Shelby County Division of Planning & Development

Twin Cities Area Transportation Study (TwinCATS) Adopted:

UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM

MoDOT Dashboard. Measurements of Performance

NCHRP Framework Project. Ida van Schalkwyk, CH2M HILL Tim Neuman, CH2M HILL. Crown Plaza Austin, Austin, TX

TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM WAUSAU METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION WAUSAU, WISCONSIN METROPOLITAN AREA

SEDA-COG Metropolitan Planning Organization Long Range Transportation Plan. Regional Performance Measures Report

GLOSSARY. At-Grade Crossing: Intersection of two roadways or a highway and a railroad at the same grade.

FY 2015 FY 2019 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION

Metro Boston Projections Update. Tim Reardon Director of Data Services Metropolitan Area Planning Council

Hot Springs Bypass Extension TIGER 2017 Application. Benefit-Cost Analysis Methodology Summary

Review and Update of Year 2035 Regional Transportation Plan

I-75 at Overpass Road Interchange

FY 2017 Rural Transportation Planning Work Program SCOPE OF WORK

Mankato/North Mankato Area Planning Organization (MAPO) 2018 & (2019 Draft) Work Program & Budget

Financial Snapshot October 2014

Unified Planning Work Program Fiscal Year 2017 (July 1, 2016 June 30, 2017)

MPO Staff Report MPO EXECUTIVE BOARD: August 16, 2017

MPO Policy Board Thursday, October 18, 2018 South Waco Community Center Large Conference Room, 2:00 p.m Speight Avenue, Waco, Texas

Transportation Improvement Program

Genesee County Metropolitan Planning Commission Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)

Congestion Management Process. Prepared by: Ghyabi & Associates, Inc.

A Projection of United States Traffic Fatality Counts in April Charles M. Farmer Insurance Institute for Highway Safety

CAPE COD REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY (a component Unit of the Massachusetts Department of Transportation)

HB2 and HB1887 Update

NASHVILLE AREA MPO TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY

Tribal Transportation Program Workshop. Transportation Planning

White Paper: Performance-Based Needs Assessment

City of Grand Forks Staff Report

BINGHAMTON METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION STUDY CERTIFICATION NARRATIVE FY 2016

Fiscal Year VDOT Annual Budget June 2017

Redbook. Department of Transportation

TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM REVISION 19 F E D E R A L F I S C A L Y E A R S Expedited Administrative Modifications

Summary Narrative of Amendment 3 to the FFY Transportation Improvement Program for the Northern Middlesex Region

CHAPTER 16: FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

FY2019 UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM (UPWP) Missouri CPG Funds: $230,978 Kansas CPG Funds: $3,520 Local Funds: $58,624 Total UPWP Amount: $293,122

2017 Educational Series FUNDING

FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Chapter 4: Regional Transportation Finance

Annual Performance Report Proposal MassDOT SFY Prepared by OPM&I November, 2015

Contents. Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization. Introduction S. St. Mary s Street San Antonio, Texas 78205

I-81 Corridor Improvement Plan. October 2018 Public Meetings

3. Performance targets for asset condition and system performance (Attached) John Madera, NSVRC

Prepared by the South East Texas Regional Planning Commission-Metropolitan Planning Organization (SETRPC-MPO) December 6, 2013

INVESTING STRATEGICALLY

Terre Haute Seelyville West Terre Haute Vigo County. Brazil Harmony Knightsville Clay County

2017 TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN PROGRESS REPORT

Chapter 5: Cost and Revenues Assumptions

METROPOLITAN TOPEKA PLANNING ORGANIZATION TOPEKA, KANSAS

Performance-based Planning and Programming. white paper

APPENDIX I REVENUE PROJECTION AND ASSUMPTIONS

CAPE COD REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY (a component Unit of the Massachusetts Department of Transportation)

6d.) HB2 District Grant Program Allocation Formula

SOLUTIONS FOR SAVING LIVES ON TEXAS ROADS

TANGIPAHOA 2048 METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR THE SOUTH TANGIPAHOA URBANIZED AREA. draft plan:

Minnesota Transportation Funding Redistribution ( ) Who Contributes More, Who Receives More?

Transcription:

NMETROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATIO BOSTON REGION MPO BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Stephanie Pollack, MassDOT Secretary and CEO and MPO Chair Karl H. Quackenbush, Executive Director, MPO Staff TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM DATE: February 1, 2018 (Revised February 7, 2018) TO: Boston Region MPO FROM: Michelle Scott, MPO Staff RE: Federally Required CY 2018 Highway Safety Targets The Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) voted to adopt the Commonwealth s calendar year (CY) 2018 highway safety targets for five federally required highway safety performance measures at its February 1, 2018 meeting. MPO staff along with Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) staff presented information about these measures and the Commonwealth s CY 2018 targets at the MPO s January 18, 2018 meeting. MPO staff presented its recommendation that the MPO adopt the Commonwealth s targets at the February 1 meeting. 1 HIGHWAY SAFETY PERFORMANCE MONITORING REQUIREMENTS A series of federal rules designed to focus the federal surface transportation program on achieving performance outcomes were initiated under the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) legislation and continued under the Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act. 1 The National Performance Management Measures: Highway Safety Improvement Program rule identifies the five highway safety performance measures for which targets must be set: 1) Number of fatalities 2) Rate of fatalities per 100 million vehicle-miles traveled (VMT) 3) Number of serious injuries 4) Rate of serious injuries per 100 million VMT 5) Number of non-motorized fatalities and non-motorized serious injuries 1 These rules pertain to performance-based planning and programming for highway safety: The Statewide and Nonmetropolitan Transportation Planning and Metropolitan Transportation Planning final rule establishes requirements for state and MPO planning processes, including those pertaining to performance-based decision making, target setting, and reporting. (23 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Parts 450 and 771 and 49 CFR Part 613) The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) rule includes requirements for states to report annually on targets and progress for federally identified highway safety performance measures. (23 CFR Part 494) The National Performance Management Measures: Highway Safety Improvement Program rule identifies the relevant performance measures. (23 CFR Part 490) State Transportation Building Ten Park Plaza, Suite 2150 Boston, MA 02116-3968 Tel. (857) 702-3700 Fax (617) 570-9192 TTY (617) 570-9193 www.bostonmpo.org

According to these rules, the Commonwealth must establish and report targets for each of the five performance measures for the upcoming calendar year by August 31 of each year. Following the Commonwealth s target setting, the Boston Region MPO is required to establish targets and report them to MassDOT by February 27 of the calendar year for which the targets apply. Should the MPO adopt the Commonwealth s highway safety targets, it would agree to plan and program projects so that they contribute to accomplishing the Commonwealth s targets. Should the MPO set targets specific to the MPO region, it would need to set quantifiable targets. This would include estimating vehicle-miles traveled for all public roads in the MPO region and reporting the methods used to produce those estimates. In either case, the Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) and the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) will present the measures and targets established by the MPO. The LRTP will describe progress made toward meeting these targets compared to past performance or baseline data. The TIP will provide, to the maximum extent practicable, a description of the anticipated effect of the TIP toward achieving performance targets identified in the LRTP. When setting targets, the MPO will need to coordinate with MassDOT, other participating Commonwealth agencies, and other stakeholders. It will also need to incorporate goals, objectives, measures, and targets from the Commonwealth s safety plans and processes into the MPO s planning process. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) will review the Commonwealth s progress with respect to its targets once data is available, and will notify the Commonwealth about whether it has met or made significant progress toward its CY 2018 safety performance targets. Should a state not make significant progress on its highway safety targets, FHWA will limit its flexibility when spending federal transportation dollars in an effort to direct funding toward projects and initiatives that would improve highway safety. FHWA will not review MPO progress on these performance measures directly; and the MPO will neither be penalized for not achieving highway safety targets nor rewarded for attaining them. During certification reviews, FHWA will examine how MPOs are implementing a performance-based planning and programming process, and assess how MPOs are progressing toward their own targets or assisting the state in making progress toward its targets. Page 2 of 7

2 COMMONWEALTH HIGHWAY SAFETY PERFORMANCE TARGETS FOR CY 2018 Highway safety performance targets for CY 2018 will reflect a 2014 18 rolling annual average, as required by FHWA. For this initial target-setting year, the Commonwealth estimated safety measure trend values based on linear trend lines that were calculated using 2007 11, 2008 12, 2009 13, 2010 14, and 2011 15 five-year rolling averages. For all measures, except the non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries measure, the Commonwealth used the 2014 18 rolling average values projected by the downward trend lines as its CY 2018 targets. For the non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries measure, the Commonwealth used the 2011 15 rolling average value as its CY 2018 target. Table 1 lists the Commonwealth s 2011 15 rolling average values and CY 2018 targets for the five highway safety performance measures. (Charts showing trend data for these five measures are included at the conclusion of this memorandum.) Table 1 2018 Massachusetts Statewide Highway Safety Performance Trends and Targets 2015 Safety Measure Value (2011 15 Rolling Average) 2018 Safety Measure Target (Expected 2014 18 Rolling Average) Highway Safety Performance Measure Number of fatalities 361.0 352.0 Rate of fatalities per 100 million vehicle-miles traveled 0.641 0.610 Number of serious injuries 3,251.8 2,896.0 Rate of serious injuries per 100 million vehicle-miles traveled 5.779 5.010 Number of nonmotorized fatalities and nonmotorized serious injuries 540.8 540.8 Sources: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Fatality Analysis Reporting System, Massachusetts Crash Data System, Massachusetts Department of Transportation. Although nonmotorized fatalities and serious injuries are projected to increase through CY 2018 based on historic data, the Commonwealth has been working to counteract this trend through its planning and programming. While the Commonwealth has set CY 2018 targets for these five measures to meet federal requirements, it also has a long-term goal to Move toward Zero Page 3 of 7

Deaths and eliminate fatalities and serious injuries on Massachusetts roadways. 2 3 NEXT STEPS At its February 1, 2018 meeting, the Boston Region MPO voted to adopt and support the Commonwealth s CY 2018 highway safety performance targets. MPO staff will present and describe these targets in the performance chapter of the federal fiscal years 2019 23 TIP document. MassDOT and the Boston Region MPO will continue to work together to examine how planning and programming at the Commonwealth and MPO levels can support improvements in highway safety outcomes. Both agencies can also explore other methods and factors to consider when setting future highway safety performance targets. During CY 2018, the Commonwealth will be developing its next five-year Strategic Highway Safety Plan, which will inform future approaches for planning, programming, and monitoring performance to improve safety outcomes. Similarly, the MPO will be developing its next LRTP Needs Assessment during CY 2018 and will be finalizing its next LRTP in CY 2019. As part of these activities, MPO staff will analyze safety issues and trends in the Boston region in more detail. In addition to informing future target setting, this analysis will allow the MPO to examine and discuss opportunities to track other highway safety performance measures. The MPO may also choose to set additional safety targets, which may include targets with longer time horizons than those required by FHWA. 4 APPENDIX: HIGHWAY SAFETY PERFORMANCE TRENDS The five charts in this section illustrate highway safety performance trends in Massachusetts, along with the Commonwealth s CY 2018 targets. These charts also show historic trend data and projected 2014 and 2014 18 rolling annual averages for the Boston region. 2 Massachusetts Strategic Highway Safety Plan, 2013, p. 1. Page 4 of 7

Figure 1 Number of Fatalities Boston Region MPO data reflects 101 municipalities. Values reflect five-year rolling averages and have been rounded to the nearest integer. Sources: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Fatality Analysis and Reporting System, Massachusetts Department of Transportation, Boston Region MPO staff. Figure 2 Fatality Rate per 100 Million Vehicle Miles Traveled Boston Region MPO data reflects 101 municipalities. Values reflect five-year rolling averages and have been rounded to the hundreth decimal place. Sources: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Fatality Analysis and Reporting System, Massachusetts Department of Transportation, Boston Region MPO staff. Page 5 of 7

Figure 3 Number of Serious Injuries Boston Region MPO data reflects 101 municipalities. Values reflect five-year rolling averages and have been rounded to the nearest integer. Sources: Massachusetts Crash Data System, Massachusetts Department of Transportation, Boston Region MPO staff. Figure 4 Serious Injury Rate per 100 Million Vehicle Miles Traveled Boston Region MPO data reflects 101 municipalities. Values reflect five-year rolling averages and have been rounded to the hundreth decimal place. Sources: Massachusetts Crash Data System, Massachusetts Department of Transportation, Boston Region MPO staff. Page 6 of 7

Figure 5 Number of Non-motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries Boston Region MPO data reflects 101 municipalities. Values reflect five-year rolling averages and have been rounded to the tenth decimal place. Sources: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Fatality Analysis and Reporting System, Massachusetts Crash Data System, Massachusetts Department of Transportation, Boston Region MPO staff. MS/ms Page 7 of 7