THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE Continuing Legal Education

Similar documents
Revenue Procedure 98-1

ARTICLE * Making the Portability Election Simpler: Rev. Proc , I.R.B. 1282

Recent Developments in the Estate and Gift Tax Area. Annual Business Plan and the Proposed Regulations under Section 2642

ESTATE PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION FOR S CORPORATIONS

Drafting Marital Trusts

Drafting Marital Trusts

26 CFR (a)-1: Qualified terminable interest property elections.

Session 1: Estate Planning Hot Topics: 2016

Revenue Procedure

Foreign Insurer: to Elect or Not to Elect (That Is a Question)

Revenue Procedure

2017 Required Amendments List for Qualified Retirement Plans

Accounting Method Changes Current and Future State. American Bar Association Section of Taxation Tax Accounting Committee January 21, 2011

CHAPTER 14 Annuities & Employment Retirement

DRAFTING TO INTEGRATE RETIREMENT PLANS AND IRAs INTO THE ESTATE PLAN

MAKE YOUR CHARITABLE ESTATE PLAN GREAT AGAIN Charitable Planning with Retirement Accounts: Strategies, Traps & Solutions

This revenue procedure modifies the annual limitation on deductions for

A Primer on Portability

JCT releases official 2013 individual income tax brackets and standard deduction amounts

1.0 Law & Legal CLE Credit A/V Approval # Recording Date October 19, 2017 Recording Availability October 12, 2018

Revenue Procedure

The BDIT (Beneficiary Defective Inheritor's Trust)

ACTION: Final regulations and removal of temporary regulations. SUMMARY: This document contains final regulations that provide guidance under

INSTALLMENT SALES TO GRANTOR TRUSTS

principal in the discretion of an independent trustee. The strategy, if sound, would have a number potential benefits. For example, it would permit:

2010 and Beyond: Estate Planning and Administration Issues

Clickheretoview thethirdquarter2014issue

Rev. Proc SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS SECTION 1. PURPOSE

Income Tax Rates are Higher

REVISING ESTATE PLANS IN LIGHT OF THE RECENT NYS ESTATE TAX CHANGES. October 30, 2014

ANITA J. SIEGEL, ESQ. Siegel & Bergman, LLC 365 South Street Morristown, NJ Fax

Rev. Proc SECTION 1. PURPOSE

Section 66. Treatment of Community Income

SECTION 5. SMALL CASE PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING COMPETENT AUTHORITY ASSISTANCE.01 General.02 Small Case Standards.03 Small Case Filing Procedure

Using Portability to Create a Flexible Estate Plan

Internal Revenue Service Alternative Dispute Resolution Techniques

Section 1014(e) and the Lock-In Problem: Basis Considerations

Revised (And Revised Again) Internal Revenue Code Section 6694 And New IRS Guidance

Revenue Procedure , Section 15.03(4)

The Virginia Limited Liability Company

I. INTRODUCTION. INITIAL CONSIDERATIONS.

4 Estate Tax Issues 1

Recent Developments in Estate & Gift Tax

SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF In re the Marriage of. ) DOMESTIC RELATIONS ORDER Petitioner,

Division Of Charitable Remainder Trust after Divorce: A Model Memorandum

Internal Revenue Service

Via Electronic Mail:

The Statute Of Limitations And Disclosure Rules For Gifts (With Checklist)

Revenue Procedure 97-27

-1- Model Amendments to Add Bifurcated Distribution Options to Defined Benefit Plans

NAVIGATING AN IRS EXAM

THE SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL NO. 73 PENSION PLAN PROCEDURES FOR THE DIVISION OF PENSION BENEFITS PURSUANT TO QUALIFIED DOMESTIC RELATIONS ORDERS

(4) Before afederal court. 14

IRS REVISES RULES FOR SUBSTANTIALLY EQUAL PERIODIC PAYMENTS ALSO IN THIS ISSUE. October 2002 Published Since 1984

(3) Old section 3.01(47), dealing with section 7701, has been deleted. See Rev. Proc , I.R.B. 14.

INCOME TAX DEDUCTIONS FOR CHARITABLE BEQUESTS OF IRD

Cumulative List of Changes in Plan Qualification Requirements for Pre-Approved Defined Contribution Plans for 2017

The Audit is Over Now What?

IN THIS ISSUE. New Mexico Supreme Court Holds Ban on Same-Sex Marriage Unconstitutional

HERMENZE & MARCANTONIO LLC ESTATE PLANNING PRIMER FOR SINGLE, DIVORCED, AND WIDOWED PEOPLE (New York)

AN EXAMINATION OF FEDERAL TAX RULES IMPACTING MARRIED SAME-SEX COUPLES FROM THE U.S. SUPREME COURT RULING IN U.S. v WINDSOR

Allocation of W-2 Wages in a Short Taxable Year and in an Acquisition or Disposition

SEC. 5. SMALL CASE PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING COMPETENT AUTHORITY ASSISTANCE.01 General.02 Small Case Standards.03 Small Case Filing Procedure

Federal Tax Research

Employer B is a political subdivision of State A. Employer B maintains the DC Plan, a

Reg. Section 1.263(a)-4(e)(2) Amounts paid to acquire or create intangibles.

Conference Agreement Double Estate Tax Exemption No Change in Basis Step-up or down -83. Estate, Gift, and GST Tax. Chapter 12

Federal Tax Update 63rd Annual Institute on Taxation Tuesday, November 15, :30am - 9:45am

Recent Developments in Estate & Gift Tax

CUSTODIAL AGREEMENT SIMPLE IRA

American Bar Association. Section of Taxation. Tax Accounting Committee. January 29, Accounting for Ratable and Non-Ratable Service Contracts

IRS Finalizes Regulations on How Post-Death Events Impact Taxable Estate Value - Guidance on Protective Claim Procedure

[26 CFR ]: Returns by exempt organizations and returns by certain nonexempt

Tosco Corporation Pension Plan For Union Employees Formerly Employed by Monsanto Company. Title VIII of the ConocoPhillips Retirement Plan

2011 REGIONAL FORUMS TRUST AND ESTATE DEVELOPMENTS

4. SELECTED ASPECTS OF FAMILY WEALTH TRANSFER

Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC.

ACCOUNTAX SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, INCORPORATED A Profile in Continuing Professional Education. Representing Clients During the Collections Process

PRIVATE RULING atty fees to class counsel.txt PRIVATE RULING PRIVATE RULING

Private Letter Ruling Annuities; Exchanges of Insurance Policies.

UPIA Amendment Saves Marital Deduction for Retirement Plans. by Steven B. Gorin 1

15 Fixing A Damaged ILIT

Reg. Section (e)(2) Wage limitation

2002 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE (60 Minutes)

PSST! Written and Presented by: Lora G. Davis. Davis Stephenson, PLLC

Rev. Proc , IRB 357, 01/18/2007, IRC Sec(s).

Working with the IRS Office of Appeals

DISPOSITIONS OF TANGIBLE PROPERTY

PRIVATE ENTITY PROCEDURES

26 C.F.R Changes in accounting periods and in methods of accounting

tax notes Volume 150, Number 12 March 21, 2016

TABLE OF CONTENTS. .03 Farmers cooperatives. .01 A request made during the course of an examination

SCRIBNER, HALL & THOMPSON, LLP

What is a disclaimer? A disclaimer is an irrevocable statement that the beneficiary/recipient of an asset does not wish to receive the asset.

STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS Analyze This. By LG Brooks Enrolled Agent

TAX & TRANSACTIONS BULLETIN

PREPARING GIFT TAX RETURNS

Highlights from the 199A Proposed Regulations

.02 Changes to 481(a) Spread Period for Negative 481(a) Adjustments. (1) Section 5.02(3)(a) of Rev. Proc is modified to read as follows:

ACTION: Final regulations.

Transcription:

7 THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE Continuing Legal Education Obtaining IRS Private Letter Rulings: Remove the Uncertainty of Tax Consequences January 30, 2017 Telephone Seminar/Audio Webcast Obtaining IRS Private Letter Rulings: Remove the Uncertainty of Tax Consequences By Ronald D. Aucutt McGuireWoods LLP McLean, Virginia Stephanie Loomis-Price Winstead PC Houston, Texas Kelly L. Hellmuth McGuireWoods LLP Jacksonville, Florida Copyright 2017 by Ronald D. Aucutt. All Rights Reserved.

8 OBTAINING IRS PRIVATE LETTER RULINGS: REMOVE THE UNCERTAINTY OF TAX CONSEQUENCES TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION...1 II. LEGAL BASIS AND HISTORY...1 A. In General...1 B. Application to Estate Tax Issues...1 III. THE SERVICE S DISCRETION...2 A. General Rules...2 B. No-Rule Areas...3 IV. STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS...8 A. When to Ask for a Ruling...8 B. When Not to Ask for a Ruling...9 C. Determining the Ruling or Rulings to Request...9 V. REQUESTS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME REGARDING MISSED ELECTIONS...11 A. 9100 Relief in General...11 B. Allocations and Elections Regarding the GST Exemption...13 VI. PREPARATION OF THE RULING REQUEST...15 A. Describing the Proposed Transaction (Course of Conduct)...15 B. Dealing with Disclosure About Those Ws, Xs, Ys, and Zs...15 C. Drafting the Ruling Request...16 D. Consultation with the Service...17 E. Expedited Handling...18 i

9 F. User Fees...18 VII. THE SERVICE S CONSIDERATION OF A RULING REQUEST...19 A. Personnel...19 B. The Taxpayer s Participation...19 VIII. OPTIONS IF THE SERVICE WILL NOT RULE FAVORABLY...20 A. Modifying the Ruling Request...20 B. Withdrawing the Ruling Request...20 C. Accepting an Adverse Ruling...20 D. Achieving Reconsideration Above the Branch Level...21 IX. THE EFFECT OF A RULING...21 A. Reliance...21 B. Necessary Modification or Supplementation...21 ii

10 OBTAINING IRS PRIVATE LETTER RULINGS: REMOVE THE UNCERTAINTY OF TAX CONSEQUENCES I. INTRODUCTION A letter ruling is a written determination issued to a taxpayer by an Associate office [Office of Associate Chief Counsel] in response to the taxpayer s written inquiry, filed prior to the filing of returns or reports that are required by the tax laws, about its status for tax purposes or the tax effects of its acts or transactions. A letter ruling interprets the tax laws and applies them to the taxpayer s specific set of facts. A letter ruling is issued when appropriate in the interest of sound tax administration. Rev. Proc. 2017-1, 2017-1 I.R.B. 1, 2.01. Cf. Reg. 601.201(a)(2). II. LEGAL BASIS AND HISTORY A. In General 1. Supplementing the general statutory authority of the Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service ( the Service ) to administer the tax law under section 7805 of the Internal Revenue Code, the authority for issuing rulings is derived from Reg. 601.201. 2. Rev. Proc. 2017-1 is the bible for ruling requests. This revenue procedure is updated annually and is usually the first revenue procedure of the year. B. Application to Estate Tax Issues 1. Historically, the Service would not rule on the application of estate tax to the property or estate of a living person. See, e.g., Rev. Proc. 87-1, 1987-1 C.B. 503, 5.02. Such a ruling was regarded as hypothetical, given that no transaction had occurred or was proposed to be undertaken, and no tax return was due. 2. On October 26, 1987, the Service announced a one-year test program of issuing prospective estate tax rulings on the basis of executed or proposed documents. Rev. Proc. 87-58, 1987-2 C.B. 764; Rev. Proc. 88-1, 1988-1 C.B. 557, 560, 5.02. The test was limited to ruling requests involving three specific subjects: a. Whether a power of disposition over property is a general power of appointment under section 2041. b. Whether an interest in property is a terminable interest (including QTIP) for purposes of the estate tax marital deduction. 1

11 c. Whether a governing document provides a surviving spouse with a general power of appointment over trust property for purposes of the estate tax marital deduction. 3. On October 24, 1988, the Service extended this test until December 31, 1989, and extended it to all estate tax subjects. Rev. Proc. 88-50, 1988-2 C.B. 711; Rev. Proc. 89-1, 1989-1 C.B. 740, 5.02. 4. The test was then made permanent. Rev. Proc. 90-1, 1990-1 C.B. 356, 17.02. 5. Currently, the Service may issue letter rulings on transactions affecting the estate tax on the prospective estate of a living person, except on computations of tax, actuarial factors, or factual matters. Rev. Proc. 2017-1, 5.06. 6. Even so, there are topics that are still subject to the historical limitation, such as the eligibility of a person s business structure for deferred estate tax payment under section 6166. a. Theoretically, section 6166 does not affect the amount of the estate tax. In addition, section 6166 is under the jurisdiction of a different division of the Chief Counsel s office. b. A ruling under section 6166 may be requested after a decedent has died but before the estate tax return is filed. III. THE SERVICE S DISCRETION A. General Rules 1. Except in the few cases where the Internal Revenue Code or the regulations require a ruling, the Service is not obligated to issue a ruling. 2. The Service will not rule on: a. Tax issues that are in audit (including Appeals) or litigation. Rev. Proc. 2017-1, 6.01. b. Frivolous issues issues without basis in fact or law, or that assert a position that courts have held frivolous or groundless. Id. 6.10. 3. The Service will ordinarily not rule on: a. Issues that are factual. Id. 6.02. b. Only part of an integrated transaction (generally a request must pertain to the larger transaction). Id. 6.03. 2