ECON402: Practice Final Exam Solutions

Similar documents
M.Phil. Game theory: Problem set II. These problems are designed for discussions in the classes of Week 8 of Michaelmas term. 1

CUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications Final Exam Ronaldo Carpio Jan. 13, 2015

Game Theory. Important Instructions

HW Consider the following game:

Economics 171: Final Exam

Economics 431 Infinitely repeated games

FDPE Microeconomics 3 Spring 2017 Pauli Murto TA: Tsz-Ning Wong (These solution hints are based on Julia Salmi s solution hints for Spring 2015.

G5212: Game Theory. Mark Dean. Spring 2017

Answer Key: Problem Set 4

Econ 101A Final exam May 14, 2013.

14.12 Game Theory Midterm II 11/15/ Compute all the subgame perfect equilibria in pure strategies for the following game:

Problem 3 Solutions. l 3 r, 1

Duopoly models Multistage games with observed actions Subgame perfect equilibrium Extensive form of a game Two-stage prisoner s dilemma

In reality; some cases of prisoner s dilemma end in cooperation. Game Theory Dr. F. Fatemi Page 219

Microeconomic Theory II Preliminary Examination Solutions

Microeconomics II. CIDE, MsC Economics. List of Problems

Microeconomics of Banking: Lecture 5

CUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications, Lecture 9

ECONS 424 STRATEGY AND GAME THEORY MIDTERM EXAM #2 ANSWER KEY

Games of Incomplete Information ( 資訊不全賽局 ) Games of Incomplete Information

Optimal selling rules for repeated transactions.

Simon Fraser University Spring 2014

Microeconomics III. Oligopoly prefacetogametheory (Mar 11, 2012) School of Economics The Interdisciplinary Center (IDC), Herzliya

Game Theory: Additional Exercises

FDPE Microeconomics 3 Spring 2017 Pauli Murto TA: Tsz-Ning Wong (These solution hints are based on Julia Salmi s solution hints for Spring 2015.

ECON106P: Pricing and Strategy

UC Berkeley Haas School of Business Economic Analysis for Business Decisions (EWMBA 201A) Fall 2012

Solution Problem Set 2

Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program June 2017

Repeated Games. Econ 400. University of Notre Dame. Econ 400 (ND) Repeated Games 1 / 48

Introduction to Game Theory Lecture Note 5: Repeated Games

In Class Exercises. Problem 1

Chapter 8. Repeated Games. Strategies and payoffs for games played twice

Econ 101A Final exam May 14, 2013.

Game Theory. Wolfgang Frimmel. Repeated Games

UC Berkeley Haas School of Business Game Theory (EMBA 296 & EWMBA 211) Summer 2016

Eco AS , J. Sandford, spring 2019 March 9, Midterm answers

Games with Private Information 資訊不透明賽局

Warm Up Finitely Repeated Games Infinitely Repeated Games Bayesian Games. Repeated Games

Introduction to Political Economy Problem Set 3

CHAPTER 14: REPEATED PRISONER S DILEMMA

Topics in Informational Economics 2 Games with Private Information and Selling Mechanisms

Strategic Production Game 1

ECON/MGEC 333 Game Theory And Strategy Problem Set 9 Solutions. Levent Koçkesen January 6, 2011

Noncooperative Oligopoly

Exercises Solutions: Oligopoly

MKTG 555: Marketing Models

Economics 502 April 3, 2008

Microeconomic Theory II Preliminary Examination Solutions Exam date: June 5, 2017

Problem Set 2 - SOLUTIONS

Player 2 L R M H a,a 7,1 5,0 T 0,5 5,3 6,6

Game Theory with Applications to Finance and Marketing, I

MA200.2 Game Theory II, LSE

Lecture Notes on Anticommons T. Bergstrom, April 2010 These notes illustrate the problem of the anticommons for one particular example.

MA300.2 Game Theory 2005, LSE

Econ 101A Final exam Th 15 December. Do not turn the page until instructed to.

EconS 424 Strategy and Game Theory. Homework #5 Answer Key

EconS 424 Strategy and Game Theory. Homework #5 Answer Key

ECE 586BH: Problem Set 5: Problems and Solutions Multistage games, including repeated games, with observed moves

Strategy -1- Strategy

Sequential-move games with Nature s moves.

The Ohio State University Department of Economics Second Midterm Examination Answers

Prisoner s dilemma with T = 1

Bayesian Nash Equilibrium

The Nash equilibrium of the stage game is (D, R), giving payoffs (0, 0). Consider the trigger strategies:

UC Berkeley Haas School of Business Game Theory (EMBA 296 & EWMBA 211) Summer Review, oligopoly, auctions, and signaling. Block 3 Jul 1, 2018

Microeconomics I. Undergraduate Programs in Business Administration and Economics

Answers to Microeconomics Prelim of August 24, In practice, firms often price their products by marking up a fixed percentage over (average)

Spring 2017 Final Exam

Not 0,4 2,1. i. Show there is a perfect Bayesian equilibrium where player A chooses to play, player A chooses L, and player B chooses L.

1 Solutions to Homework 4

14.12 Game Theory - Midterm I 10/13/2011

Outline for Dynamic Games of Complete Information

13.1 Infinitely Repeated Cournot Oligopoly

Repeated Games. September 3, Definitions: Discounting, Individual Rationality. Finitely Repeated Games. Infinitely Repeated Games

Game Theory and Economics Prof. Dr. Debarshi Das Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati.

Final Examination December 14, Economics 5010 AF3.0 : Applied Microeconomics. time=2.5 hours

Repeated Games. EC202 Lectures IX & X. Francesco Nava. January London School of Economics. Nava (LSE) EC202 Lectures IX & X Jan / 16

Iterated Dominance and Nash Equilibrium

UCLA Department of Economics Ph.D. Preliminary Exam Industrial Organization Field Exam (Spring 2010) Use SEPARATE booklets to answer each question

Microeconomic Theory August 2013 Applied Economics. Ph.D. PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION MICROECONOMIC THEORY. Applied Economics Graduate Program

University of Hong Kong ECON6036 Stephen Chiu. Extensive Games with Perfect Information II. Outline

Math 152: Applicable Mathematics and Computing

GAME THEORY. Department of Economics, MIT, Follow Muhamet s slides. We need the following result for future reference.

1 x i c i if x 1 +x 2 > 0 u i (x 1,x 2 ) = 0 if x 1 +x 2 = 0

(a) (5 points) Suppose p = 1. Calculate all the Nash Equilibria of the game. Do/es the equilibrium/a that you have found maximize social utility?

Exercise Chapter 10

Elements of Economic Analysis II Lecture XI: Oligopoly: Cournot and Bertrand Competition

Lecture 6 Dynamic games with imperfect information

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY. Department of Economics. January Written Portion of the Comprehensive Examination for

Notes for Section: Week 7

Infinitely Repeated Games

Table 10.1: Elimination and equilibrium. 1. Is there a dominant strategy for either of the two agents?

Microeconomic Theory II Preliminary Examination Solutions Exam date: August 7, 2017

Lecture 5 Leadership and Reputation

Microeconomics Comprehensive Exam

Problem Set 3: Suggested Solutions

Econ 101A Final exam Mo 18 May, 2009.

Stochastic Games and Bayesian Games

Microeconomic Theory May 2013 Applied Economics. Ph.D. PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION MICROECONOMIC THEORY. Applied Economics Graduate Program.

Transcription:

CO42: Practice Final xam Solutions Summer 22 Instructions There is a total of four problems. You must answer any three of them. You get % for writing your name and 3% for each of the three best problems that you answer. You have minutes to complete the exam. Please don t forget to write your name on all the pages that you want to be graded. Bonus points Please write your name and report the grade that you expect to receive on the attached piece of paper. I will collect these papers and keep them in my office while the TA grades the exam. If your reported grade is close enough to the grade assigned by the TA, you will receive an additional % bonus. Formally, if you write the number X and the TA gives you a grade Y and X Y <2., then your final grade for the exam will be. Y Formulas Suppose that you want to find the value x that maximizes a concave and quadratic function f :R R. If f is written as f(x)= ax 2 + bx+ c with a>, then x = b/2a. If f is written as f(x)= a x x x x2 with a>, then x =(x + x 2 )/2. The present value of a constant stream of payoffs is ū/( δ). If v is distributed uniform[, v], then Prob(v v )= v / v. 3 pts Suppose that Anna and Bob play the following simultaneous move game twice, and Problem. their total payoffs are the sum of the payoffs they get at each stage. Is there a SP on which the players choose (B,y) on the first stage? If your answer is positive you must provide the SP describing the strategies in detail, if it is negative you must explain why this is the case. A, 2, 4, 3 B 2, 3,, 2 C, 4, 6 3, D 2, 2, 9, 2 There seems to be some confusion about this problem. A lot of people got the equivalent problem wrong on the HW so I will write a detailed description. This problem refers a to a simple extensive form game in which a strategic form game is played twice. The problem asks you if there is a SP in which players choose (B,y) on the first period. To find SP we use backward induction however: there is more than one way to do backward induction and there are many SP. I am only asking you to find one SP with the desired property.

Its important to start by understanding what is a strategy in this FG. A strategy has to specify what each player chooses on each information set. Both players have one information set on the first period and one information set on the second period corresponding to each different outcome of the first period. So each player has 2+=3 information sets. And a strategy must specify what to do on each of these information sets. A simple way of describing a strategy is to specify what players do on the first period (eg D,z) and to specify what they would do on the second period conditional on the outcome of the first period by using a table like the following one: A A,y D,y D,y B D,z C,x C,z C D,x B,z B,x D C,z A,x A,x This table specifies, for instance, that if the outcome of the first period is (A,x) then Anna will choose A on the second period and Bob will choose y on the second period. otice that there are many different ways of filling this table. Actually player has 4 3=678864 and player 2 has 3 3=94323 different strategies, so that trying to write a complete strategic form game is pointless. SP requires that on the second period players choose a of the original game. Hence in the second period players have to choose either (A,x), (C,y) or (D,z) that would result in second period payoffs of (-,), (4,6) or (D,z) respectively. Depending on which you pick for each subgame you would different SP, I am asking you to pick them in such a way that you will find a SP in which they play (B,y) on the first period. For example you could specify the following strategy for the second period: A A,x D,z D,z B D,z A,x C,y C C,y A,x C,y D D,z C,y A,x Cont. strategies A -, 9,2 9,2 B 9,2 -, 4,6 C 4,6 -, 4,6 D 9,2 4,6 -, Cont. values A -2,,3 3, B 7, -,,8 C 3, 3, 7, D 7,3 6,6 8,7 Total. payoffs However choosing this strategies for the second period wont help our cause because they wont generate incentives to play (B,y) on the first period. By doing backward induction in this way you will find some SP but not the one that we are looking for. To see this notice that after replacing the subgames with the equilibrium payoffs we get the previous total payoff table (obtained by adding up the (second stage) continuation payoffs and the (first stage) payoffs from the original game). Which actually has no in pure strategies. To find the desired SP we must choose the continuation values (payoffs corresponding to the second period) in a smart way that generates the incentives too play (B,y) on the first period. We want to use continuation strategies with the following property: if people actually play (B,y) play a continuation equilibrium tomorrow that is good for both (eg (C,y)) if only Anna deviates play a continuation equilibrium that is bad for Anna (eg (A,x)) if only Bob deviates play a continuation equilibrium that is bad for Bob (eg (D,z)) 2

Consider the strategies with Anna and Bob choosing (B,y) on the first period and making choices in the second period that depend on the outcome of the first period according to the following table of continuation strategies: A C,y A,x C,y B D,z C,y D,z C C,y A,x C,y D C,y A,x C,y Cont. strategies A 4,6 -, 4,6 B 9,2 4,6 9,2 C 4,6 -, 4,6 D 4,6 -, 4,6 Cont. values A 3,,6 8,9 B 7, 4,6,4 C 3, 3, 7, D 2,7, 3,8 Total. payoffs Since (C,y), (D,z) and (A,x) are of the stage game, these strategies induce in all the proper subgames (in the second period). Performing one step of backward induction, we obtain the previous table of total payoffs for the first period. Since (B,y) is a of the resulting game, the proposed strategies are indeed a SP. 3 pts Consider a Cournot duopoly with firms and 2 producing the same good with constant Problem 2. marginal cost c= and inverse demand function: ach firm wishes to maximize its profits: P(q,q 2 )= q q 2 Best response functions are given by: u i (q,q 2 )=(P(q,q 2 ) c)q i =(9 q q 2 )q i BR i (q i )=4 2 q i The symmetric Pareto efficient outcome has both firms choosing q = 22 and the unique ash equilibrium has both firms producing q C = 3. ow suppose that the game is repeated infinitely and firms discount their future profits with a common discount factorδ (,). Consider the following grim trigger strategies: Choose q as long as everyone has chosen q in the past and choose p C otherwise Find the minimum value ofδsuch that the grim trigger strategies are a SP of the repeated game? Hint: Start by looking for the the most profitable deviations along the equilibrium path (ie the best responses to q in the stage game) Since(q C,q C ) is a of the stage game, it is always IC to play q C forever if you think that your opponent will play q C forever independently of what you do. Hence we only have to verify that players are willing to choose q along the equilibrium path. First notice that your most profitable deviation if your opponent is choosing q is q : q = BR(q )=4 2 22=337. 3

ow define u,u C and u to be: u = u(q C,q C )=(9 22 22) 22=2 u C = u(q C,q C )=(9 3 3) 3=9 u = u(q,q )=(9 22 337.) 337.=396.2 So each player thinks as follows: If I choose q today I will get u forever whereas if I deviate today I can get at most u today and then I will get u C from tomorrow onwards. Hence a player wants to deviate if and only if: δ u < u + δ δ uc δ.3 For details as to how I got that value see slides on repeated games (we solved this problem in class). 3 pts Consider the following strategic situation with incomplete information involving two Problem 3. firms: an incumbent and a potential entrant. The incumbent is the only firm currently operating in the industry and it is sells a product with either good quality (G) or bad quality (B). The quality of the incumbent s product is known by only the incumbent, it is not known by the entrant. The product has good quality (G) with probability /2 and a bad quality (B) with probability /2. The game begins with the incumbent choosing between a high price (H) and low price (L). After observing this price, the entrant decides whether to enter () or not to enter (). Payoffs are as follows: H 4, 8, L, 6, G(/2) H, 3, L,, B(/2) 3.a) Write down an extensive form game with ature that represents this situation. The game should begin with ature choosing the type (cost) of the incumbent. L I H 4 6 G(/2) 8 B(/2) L I H 3 4

3.b) Write down a Bayesian strategic form game that represents this situation. HH., 2., 2.,., HL., 2.,. 3.,. 4., LH 2, 2., 2. 4, 2. 4., LL 2, 2 3., 2, 2 3., 3.c) Find all the Bayesian ash equilibria in pure strategies. The only B in pure strategies is (LL, ), ie the incumbent always chooses low prices and the incumbent chooses to enter if and only if it observes a high price. 3 pts Consider a first price auction with 2 potential buyers. ach buyer i has a private value Problem 4. v i and values are distributed uniformly on[,]. Buyers simultaneously and independently submit bids b i. The object is allocated to the buyer with the greatest bid so that payoffs are: v i b i if b i > b i u i (v, b)= otherwise Find the unique ash equilibrium in pure strategies. Hint: guess that equilibrium bids are linear, ie b i (v i )=av i See class slides or chapter 27 in the textbook for the solution.