The Citadel. Multi-Hazard Mitigation Disaster Resistant University Plan

Similar documents
PHASE 2 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT

Mapping Flood Risk in the Upper Fox River Basin:

Overview of HAZUS. December 6, 2011

RISK MANAGEMENT NEXT GENERATION

AIR Worldwide Analysis: Exposure Data Quality

Emergency Management. December 16, 2010

Planning for SLR Resiliency in Virginia Beach

ANNEX B: TOWN OF BLUE RIVER

Volusia County Floodplain Management Plan 2012

Step 3: Adaptation Planning & Design. Logan Airport

Georgia Silver Jackets Team

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 7C4

VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

Overview of HAZUS for Earthquake Loss Estimation. September 6, 2012

9.10 HEIDELBERG TOWNSHIP

Integrating Hazus into the Flood Risk Assessment

Crediting Adaptation Strategies through the National Flood Insurance Program s Community Rating System Coordinator s Manual

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Planning in Water s Way: Flood Resilient Economic Development Strategy for the I-86 Innovation Corridor

Survey of Hazus-MH: FEMA s Tool for Natural Hazard Loss Estimation

Sussex County All Hazard Mitigation Plan. Plan Executive Summary

Adaptation Practices and Lessons Learned

Flood Risk Assessment in the

Simsbury. Challenges Capitol Region Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Update - Page 356

Canada s exposure to flood risk. Who is affected, where are they located, and what is at stake

Using GISWeb to Determine Your Property s Flood Zone

3D Elevation Program (3DEP) Status and Plans. Kevin T. Gallagher Associate Director, Core Science Systems June 26, 2017

Repetitive Loss Area Revisit # 6 Walter Road Area Jefferson Parish

Challenges. Estimated Damages from 100-Year Flood

National Capitol Region HAZUS User Group Call

THE POTENTIAL ROLE OF THE COMMUNITY FOR THE FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT USING FEATURES EXTRACTED FROM LiDAR DATASETS

Hazus: Estimated Damage and Economic Losses. South Carolina United States

Garfield County NHMP:

9.8 FOUNTAIN HILL BOROUGH

Aquidneck Island Resilience Strategy Issue Paper 4. Issue: RESIDENTIAL FLOODING

Coastal Vulnerability Assessment and Adaptation Plan CITY OF CLEARWATER

Talk Components. Wharton Risk Center & Research Context TC Flood Research Approach Freshwater Flood Main Results

Storm Surge Risk and Sea-Level Rise: What the Future May Hold.

Tsunami Risk Assessment Tsunami Hazard Overview... 16

Individual Flood Preparedness Decisions During Hurricane Sandy in New York City By prof.dr. Wouter Botzen

Gerard S. Mallet, Local Mitigation Strategy Coordinator FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PLAN PROGRESS REPORT

National Capitol Region HAZUS User Group Call

HAZUS -MH Risk Assessment and User Group Series HAZUS-MH and DMA Pilot Project Portland, Oregon. March 2004 FEMA FEMA 436

SECTION 3: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

Establishing an Essential Records List Criteria and Reporting Essential Records to the University s Records Management and Archives Department

Mitigation Success Publications

Truckloads (at 25 tons/truck) of building debris 90

Leveraging HAZUS for Risk Assessment Analysis within Risk MAP

NFIP Program Basics. KAMM Regional Training

Mike Waters VP Risk Decision Services Bob Shoemaker Sr. Technical Coordinator. Insurance Services Office, Inc

Executive Summary... 2 Introduction and Study Context... 4 Flood Vulnerability Assessment... 9 Study Caveats Conclusions...

9.2 ALBURTIS BOROUGH. This section presents the jurisdictional annex for Alburtis Borough. A. HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT

Northern Kentucky University 2018 Hazard Mitigation Plan. Public Kick-Off Meeting March 20, 2018

Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan. Data Collection Questionnaire. For Local Governments

David A. Stroud, CFM AMEC Earth & Environmental Raleigh, NC

Avon. Challenges. Estimated Damages from 100- Year Flood

GIS - Introduction and Sample Uses

A Flood Mitigation Plan for the Non-Tidal N.J. Section of the Delaware River Basin. Warren County Planning Workshop (2 nd Meeting) March 7, 2007

Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan. Data Collection Questionnaire. For School Districts and Educational Institutions

Flood Vulnerability Assessment for Critical Facilities. Molly Woloszyn Lisa Graff, GISP, CFM

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Executive Summary Introduction and Study Context Cecil County s Floodplain Flood Measurement Flood Levels...

Development of an Integrated Simulation Model for Flood Risk Evaluation and Damage Assessment

Community Incentives for Nature-Based Flood Solutions

Flood: How to Protect Your Business from a Natural Disaster

East Hartford. Challenges

City of Ocean City Permit and Application Process Quality Improvement

G318 Local Mitigation Planning Workshop. Module 2: Risk Assessment. Visual 2.0

SECTION V THE LOCAL MITIGATION STRATEGY BLUEPRINT

Town of Montrose Annex

Section 2. Introduction and Purpose of the LMS

CHAPTER THREE Natural Hazard Mitigation Strategy

HAZARD DESCRIPTION... 1 LOCATION... 2 EXTENT... 4 HISTORICAL OCCURRENCES... 6 PROBABILITY OF FUTURE EVENTS... 6 VULNERABILITY AND IMPACT...

Flood Risk Management and Nonstructural Flood Risk Adaptive Measures

Non Regulatory Risk MAP Products Flood Depth and Probability Grids

Michael Taylor, PE, CFM Project Manager, AECOM August 25, 2015

Location: Tampa, Florida March 6, 2013

SILVER JACKETS: TEAMING TO MITIGATE AND MANAGE STATE FLOOD HAZARD PRIORITIES

FLOOD INUNDATION MAPPING SCIENCE. Gardner Bent, U.S. Geological Survey, New England Water Science Center

Wildfire and Flood Hazards, Using GIS Tools to Assess Risk

Sea Level Rise and the NFIP

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Mitigation Action Plan Alamance County

Pinellas County Local Mitigation Strategy Progress Report

FEMA FLOOD MAPS Public Works Department Stormwater Management Division March 6, 2018

National Institute of Building Sciences

2015 AWRA Summer Specialty Conference: Climate Change Adaptation (New Orleans, LA) June 15, 2015 Presenter: John Squerciati, P.E.

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT. MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Public Outreach Strategy

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT. MUNICIPAL PROFILE

September Three Steps for Implementing a Complete Flood Management Plan

APPENDIX H TOWN OF FARMVILLE. Hazard Rankings. Status of Mitigation Actions. Building Permit Data. Future Land Use Map. Critical Facilities Map

Vision to Action: Creating and Using a Flood Risk Assessment for Identifying Mitigation Options

Overview of Capabilities and Current Limitations

Disaster Risk Reduction and Financing in the Pacific A Catastrophe Risk Information Platform Improves Planning and Preparedness

Not Your Average Risk Assessment: Multi-Stage Risk Assessments for Sites in the Passaic River Basin Stuart Geiger, CFM Joseph Ruggeri, PE, CFM

Handout 1.1 Essential Records

Federal Emergency Management Agency Update. Jesse F. Munoz, CEM Director Mitigation Division Region IV

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT:

Village of Blue Mounds Annex

Transcription:

The Citadel Multi-Hazard Mitigation Disaster Resistant University Plan

Project Objective To Develop a Disaster Resistant University Hazard Mitigation Plan Identify Hazards Profile Hazards Inventory Assets Estimate Losses Develop a Mitigation Strategy

University Background

History Founded in 1842 as the South Carolina Military Academy Citadel Academy in Charleston Arsenal Academy in Columbia Originally located on Marion Square One of six senior Military Colleges in the U.S. Moved to current location in 1922 City of Charleston offered 176 acres to State State supported comprehensive college 5 schools Business Education Engineering Humanities and Social Sciences Science and Mathematics

Campus Profile Located on the peninsula adjacent to the Ashley River Average campus ground elevation is 10.3 feet above sea level ~2,300 cadets ~1,200 graduate students 78 campus buildings 7 occupancy types Estimated $1Billion in assets

Local Data

Leveraged Data Building Footprints Charleston County Rectified FIRMs City of Charleston 10 ft. LiDAR DEM State of South Carolina Building Replacement Values The Citadel

Challenge: Lack of Campus Data

Solution: Creation of Campus Base Map

Challenge: No Digital FIRM The image cannot be displayed. Your computer may not have enough memory to open the image, or the image may have been corrupted. Restart your computer, and then open the file again. If the red x still appears, you may have to delete the image and then insert it again.

Solution: Digitized Flood Layer

Hazus Runs

Hazus Runs Flood Hurricane Earthquake

Assets at Risk *Agricultural building is campus green house

Flood Depth/Damage Curve Flood damage is directly related to the depth of flooding by the application of a depth damage curve. In applying the curve, a specific depth of water translates to a specific percentage of damage to the structure, which translates to the same percentage of the structure s replacement value.

Estimated Damage 100-year Flood Occupancy Type Total Number of Buildings with Loss Total Value (Building & Contents) Estimated Building Damage Estimated Content Loss Estimated Total Damage Loss Ratio Agricultural 1 $110,780 $0 $332 $332 0.003 Commercial 9 $129,111,580 $84,463 $914,858 $999,321 0.01 Education 7 $226,466,590 $405,174 $3,621,956 $4,027,130 0.02 Government 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Industrial 3 $17,292,275 $6,917 $0 $6,917 0.00 Religious 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Residential 28 $90,471,893 $525,685 $210,274 $735,959 0.01 Total 48 $463,453,118 $1,022,239 $4,747,420 $5,769,659 0.01

Sea Level Rise To determine the specific variation in loss estimates based on flood severity and sea level rise, impacts of coastal flooding were assessed using Hazus and the impact of the 100-year coastal flood on the Citadel campus with 1.08 feet of sea level rise (expected by 2050).

Facility Name LESESNE GATE & GATEHOUSE LEE ST. MARY MURRAY INFIRMARY BOAT CTR LIFT STA ST/EQ INFIRMARY GENERATOR HAMMOND AVE CENTRAL ENERGY PLANT Fire Station Police Station X Facility Type EMS X Pump Station X Utility Total 0 1 1 1 2 X X

Estimated Damage 100-year Flood + 1.08 FT SLR Occupancy Type Total Number of Buildings with Loss Total Value (Building & Contents) Estimated Building Damage Estimated Content Loss Estimated Total Damage Loss Ratio Agricultural 1 $110,780 $13,521 $36,503 $50,024 0.452 Commercial 14 $261,094,925 $8,241,715 $43,971,779 $52,213,494 0.20 Education 15 $457,173,115 $8,931,882 $78,493,014 $87,424,896 0.19 Government 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Industrial 5 $20,445,100 $2,169,998 $6,267,692 $8,437,689 0.41 Religious 1 $17,170,400 $0 $432,710 $432,710 0.03 Residential 33 $150,929,693 $7,420,844 $4,692,606 $12,113,450 0.08 Total 69 $906,924,013 $26,777,959 $133,894,303 $160,672,263 0.18

Hurricane Wind On September 22, 1989, Hurricane Hugo roared ashore just north of Charleston, S.C. as a massive Category 4 storm with winds near 140 mph and a storm tide around 20 feet.

Estimated Damage Hurricane Hugo Event Total Value Total Number of Buildings Occupancy Type (Building & Contents) Minor Moderate Severe Complete Agricultural $110,780 0 1 0 0 Commercial $264,190,940 0 15 0 0 Education $500,379,750 1 16 0 0 Government $0 0 0 0 0 Industrial $26,842,075 0 2 0 0 Religious $19,264,960 3 8 0 0 Residential $200,563,628 26 0 0 0 Total $1,011,352,133 30 47 0 0

Storm Surge Surge Category Number of Buildings Affected Category 1 10 Category 2 58 Category 3 78

1886 Earthquake Event 7.3 Magnitude 60 deaths 2,000 damaged buildings $5-6M Felt as far as Boston, MA and New Orleans, LA "Citadel, Charleston, looking north." The earthquake caused serious damage to The Citadel, The Military College of South Carolina, which dates from 1842. The view in this Howland photograph is from Marion Square, between King and Meeting streets looking north. (South Carolina Library Archives)

Charleston Area Fault Lines

Estimated Damage 1886 Earthquake Event Occupancy Type Total Number of Buildings with Losses Total Value (Building & Contents) Estimated Total Damage Estimated Loss Ratio Agricultural 1 $110,780 $54,649 0.49 Commercial 15 $266,243,445 $124,033,323 0.47 Education 18 $535,099,265 $211,943,614 0.40 Government 0 $0 $0 0.00 Industrial 8 $23,681,450 $9,338,234 0.39 Religious 2 $19,264,960 $10,365,859 0.54 Residential 34 $200,563,628 $108,949,662 0.54 Total 78 $1,044,963,528 $464,685,341 0.44

Mitigation Strategy

Mitigation Actions Develop GIS Capabilities Action Develop a system to ensure that new students, faculty, and staff are exposed to basic all-hazards preparedness training during orientation activities. Improve/upgrade stormwater drainage features Conduct survey of all campus facilities that store hazardous materials to identify non-structural components (i.e. shelving and storage areas) that may be vulnerable to earthquake damage. Hazards Addressed All Hazards All Hazards Flood Earthquake

30