The Early Warning Toolkit in practice: Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.

Similar documents
The Early Warning Toolkit in Practice: Carillion PLC

Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings

State Outlook: Debt Affordability. NCSL Conference Gail Sussman, Managing Director

OECD Workshop on Data Collection

Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings in the European Union

Webinar Navigating Choppy Markets: Safety-First Equity Strategies Based on Credit Risk Signals

Regional Economic Outlook

Introducing The Deterioration Probability Metric. A New Metric for Downgrade Risk

Mongolian Banking System

Ag Lending Experience of Living Through the Cycles

Snohomish County Public Utility District 1

Rating Action: Moody's Upgrades the City of Sacramento, CA's Lease Revenue Bonds to A1; Confirms Ser and Ser. 1993A at A2; outlook is stable

Disruption in Higher Education: What Does It Mean For Credit Ratings

Policy on the "SEC Rule 17g-7 of Representation and Warranties" (R&Ws)

Policy on Conflict of Interest Certification

Challenging Issues and Alternative Approaches to CRE Credit Risk Modeling. RPC Conference, Scottsdale

Findlay City School District, OH

A New Way to Look at Covenant Lite Collateral in CLOs

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Lowe's unsecured ratings to Baa1; P-2 commercial paper rating affirmed 12 Dec 2018

Policy for Record Retention for Rating Services

Agenda. New Mexico School District Bond Ratings 9/8/17

Underwriting standards for credit cards and auto loans tighten modestly, a positive

Policy for Analyst Rotation

Profit emergence under IFRS 17: Gaining business insight through projection models

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Counterparty Risk Ratings to three Sri Lankan banks 18 Jun 2018

Good (But Risky) Times

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa3 to West Virginia SBA's $44.4M Capital Improvement Ref. Rev. Bonds, Ser Global Credit Research - 08 Sep 2017

Township of Tredyffrin, PA

Volusia County School District (FL)

Feeling Good (For Now)

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Baa3 senior unsecured debt ratings of ICICI Bank's Bahrain branch Global Credit Research - 17 Aug 2017

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A2 to 2016B & C Senior Bonds of Central Florida Expressway Auth. (CFX), FL; Outlook positive

FORO CORFICOLOMBIANA COLOMBIA Perspectiva Económica y Crediticia

Siauliu Bankas, AB. Siauliu Bankas capital metrics will strengthen with EBRD s debt-to-equity conversion. ISSUER COMMENT 13 August 2018

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Aa1 issuer and bond ratings of the International Finance Facility for Immunisation (IFFIm) with a stable outlook

Estatus del Mercado de Emisiones de Financiamiento de Proyectos e Infraestructura

Global Credit Research - 19 Apr 2018

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A3 issuer rating to Nidec Corporation; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 31 Jan 2018

Calculating the IFRS 17 Risk Adjustment

US Local Government GO Debt Methodology

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa3 to Trinity Health Credit Group's (MI) Ser bonds; outlook revised to stable

Sanger (City of) TX. Credit Strengths. Trend of growing reserve levels. Continued tax base growth. Favorable location 40 miles north of Dallas

Rating Action: Moody's assigns (P)Ba2 ratings to Intrum Justitia AB; outlook positive Global Credit Research - 12 Jun 2017

Commercial & Ag Lending Conference 2017

Findlay City School District, OH

Butler (Village of), WI

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Intrum Justitia's Ba2 corporate family rating; outlook changed to stable Global Credit Research - 19 Apr 2018

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Aaa IFS rating of New York Life; stable outlook Global Credit Research - 27 Jul 2017

Session 4: Technical-legal panel: elements for an integrated covered bond framework

PT Indosat Tbk. Strong Revenue and Earnings Growth in FY2015 Supports Credit Profile. ISSUER COMMENT 28 March 2016

ABN AMRO Bank N.V. Q1 2018: Higher impairment offset revenue growth. ISSUER COMMENT 16 May Summary opinion

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades South Carolina Public Service Authority revenue bonds; rating outlook negative

City of Tega Cay, SC. Annual Comment on Tega Cay RATING. ISSUER COMMENT 23 March 2018

Socorro Independent School District, TX

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Coty's CFR to Ba3; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 20 Mar 2018

Credit Trends: Kenyan Banks

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Bharti's senior unsecured notes to Ba1 and assigns a Ba1 CFR; outlook negative 05 Feb 2019

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A1 to UConn GO bonds supported by State of Connecticut; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 29 Mar 2018

Request for Proposal: Moody s Signature Initiative. Corporate Social Responsibility

blend Funding plc Update to credit analysis Credit strengths » Liquidity reserve as structural enhancement Credit challenges

Rating Action: Moody's affirms the Baa2 financial strength rating on VIVAT NV's operating subsidiaries. Outlook remains stable

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades Kommunalkredit Austria AG's public-sector covered bonds Global Credit Research - 25 Jul 2017

CIMIC GROUP UPGRADED TO Baa2, OUTLOOK STABLE, BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa3/Prime-1 issuer ratings to the Departement de L'Eure; stable outlook Global Credit Research - 07 Apr 2016

Measuring Required Economic Capital and Parameterizing the Loss Reference Point

Challenges in CECL Implementation. Robby Holditch, Director, Solutions Specialist July 2018

Rating Action: Moody's changes outlook of Central Bank of India and Indian Overseas Bank to positive from stable

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Counterparty Risk Rating to FCA Bank

Port Jefferson Union Free School District, NY

Roselle Park Borough, NJ

Town of Easton, MA. Credit Strengths. Manageable long-term liabilities. Credit Challenges. Reliance on reserves to address budget gaps

Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines

Rating Action: Moody's changes rating outlook for Black Sea Trade and Development Bank to stable from negative Global Credit Research - 30 Sep 2016

Rating Action: Moody's reviews NORD/LB Luxembourg S.A. - Public-Sector Covered Bonds, direction uncertain 19 Dec 2018

Rating Action: Moody's Changes Sparebanken Vest's Rating Outlook to Stable From Negative

Duquesne University of the Holy Spirit, PA

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa2 UND/Aa3 ENH to Roswell ISD (Chaves County), NM's GOULT bonds, Ser Sep 2018

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Caa3 Issuer Rating to US Virgin Islands; lowers ratings on four liens of Matching Fund Revenue Bonds

Edison (Township of) NJ

Credit Opinion: Federal Home Loan Banks

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Banca Carige S.p.A. and places ratings under review for downgrade 07 Aug 2018

ISSUER COMMENT 02 DECEMBER 2014

Masconomet Regional School District, MA

CECL: What s on Tap for the Future of Credit Loss Accounting?

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades NORD/LB's Fuerstenberg preference shares to Caa1(hyb) Global Credit Research - 18 Apr 2018

3i Group plc. Update following the publication of first-half 2018 financial results. CREDIT OPINION 28 November Update

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A1 to San Francisco Airport Commission, CA Series 2018B-G; outlook is stable 01 May 2018

Federal Home Loan Banks

Bothell (City of) WA

Commercial & Ag Lending Conference 2017

Credit Opinion: Federal Home Loan Bank of New York

Rating Action: Moody's reviews Depfa ACS Bank's public sector covered bonds for downgrade Global Credit Research - 14 Sep 2016

Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston

Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines

Auckland Housing Affordability Remains Poor Despite Improvement

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Coty's CFR to B1; outlook negative 26 Nov 2018

Rating Action: Moody's changes the outlook on FCA Bank's senior debt rating to positive from stable

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades Permanent tsb's deposit and senior unsecured ratings; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 08 May 2015

Policy for Withdrawal of Credit Ratings

Connecticut (State of) State Revolving Fund

Transcription:

The Early Warning Toolkit in practice: Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. Moody s Analytics, CreditEdge Team April 2018

Babcock & Wilcox demonstrates High Risk for all 5 Early Warning factors Level Level Term High Risk Medium-High Risk Medium-Low Low Risk Early Warning Toolkit in Practice, April 2018 2

Babcock & Wilcox s first signaled heightened credit risk in August 2017 Term Q2 revenues down $33M; $115M charge from unexpected costs and schedule issues in Renewables agreements Subpoena from SEC regarding accounting of Renewables business in 2016 Additional costs to complete projects; changes in Management» Over the past year, B&W s measure has worsened from 3.35% to 12.40% (4x higher than the Global Machinery & Equipment Group Trigger Level of 3.09%)» The first rose sharply in August 2017 and began its ascent again in Q1 of 2018» The rating implied by its measure also deteriorated 2 notches from Caa2 to Ca. Early Warning Toolkit in Practice, April 2018 3

The has remained above its industry trigger level* since August 2017 Term *Level above which firms have historically been at highest risk of default Early Warning Toolkit in Practice, April 2018 4

B&W s measure was in line with the riskier names in its industry peer group over the last year Term Level vs Peers Level vs Driver Percentiles» Moody s Analytics research shows that a company is 10x more likely to default if its is greater than the median of its peer industry group.» B&W s has been trending closely with the 90 th percentile of its peer group over the past year, exceeding it in March 2018.» Asset volatility is in line with the 25 th percentile, while market leverage is in the 97 th percentile compared to its peer group. Early Warning Toolkit in Practice, April 2018 5

Companies that underperform their industry sectors historically experience higher default risk Term One-Year Default Rates Conditioned on Level and, %» The graph to the right shows one-year historical corporate default rates bucketed (into quartiles) by their absolute level and level relative to industry sector.» The graph shows that firms whose default probabilities are worse than 75% of the companies in their industry sector (the yellow bars) experience much higher risk of default.» B&W s measure is in the 92 nd percentile of US Machinery & Equipment Group, due primarily to high financial risk. Early Warning Toolkit in Practice, April 2018 6

B&W s measure has been consistently trending with the 90 th percentile Term» B&W s was in the highly risky 75% percentile beginning in May 2017, until it rose to the 90 th percentile in mid-august 2017.» Since then, the has been in line with or close to the 90 th percentile, until mid-march 2018 when it crossed the 90 th percentile and remains there today. Early Warning Toolkit in Practice, April 2018 7

B&W s term structure demonstrates a downward sloping shape Term» A company's term structure tends to be upward-sloping during an economic expansion, unless it is in distress. Our research shows that firm s that experience inverted term structures (1yr > 5yr ) are 13x more likely to default than firms that experience a normal upwards sloping term structure.» B&W s 1yr has been above its 5yr since mid-august 2017. Early Warning Toolkit in Practice, April 2018 8

B&W s high default risk is reflected by its increased leverage» Market leverage measures the financial risk of a firm and is forward looking.» Over the last year, B&W s market leverage has worsened by 35%» The main reason for this is added short term and long term liabilities to its books, coupled with a market value of assets lessened by 12%.» As of April 2018, B&W announced that it found $51M in additional costs to complete projects forcing them to refinance. Early Warning Toolkit in Practice, April 2018 9

while its business risk has somewhat improved Asset Vol» B&W s asset volatility improved by 2% over the past year, and has been trending downward since its high point in October 2017.» In its Q2 earnings release, B&W outlined plans to optimize growth areas (Power, Industrial) and make its Renewables business profitable.» In March 2018, B&W issued a common stock rights offering in an effort to meet its liquidity needs for the next year. Early Warning Toolkit in Practice, April 2018 10

Ryan Donahue Product Strategist 212.553.3903 tel Ryan.Donahue@moodys.com Client Services Americas: +1.212.553.1653 clientservices@moodys.com EMEA: +44.207.772.5454 clientservices.emea@moodys.com APAC: +852.3551.3077 clientservices.asia@moodys.com Japan: +81.3.5408.4100 clientservices.japan@moodys.com

2018 Moody s Corporation, Moody s Investors Service, Inc., Moody s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, MOODY S ). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES ( MIS ) ARE MOODY S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE. MOODY S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody s publications. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY S. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. Moody s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody s Corporation ( MCO ), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody s Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading Investor Relations Corporate Governance Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy. Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY S affiliate, Moody s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to wholesale clients within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a wholesale client and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to retail clients within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use MOODY S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser. Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. ( MJKK ) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody s SF Japan K.K. ( MSFJ ) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization ( NRSRO ). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively. MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000. MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements. Early Warning Toolkit in Practice, April 2018 12