Catalan functions and k-schur positivity

Similar documents
arxiv: v1 [math.co] 8 Nov 2017

LECTURE 3: FREE CENTRAL LIMIT THEOREM AND FREE CUMULANTS

Quadrant marked mesh patterns in 123-avoiding permutations

THE DEODHAR DECOMPOSITION OF THE GRASSMANNIAN AND THE REGULARITY OF KP SOLITONS

A relation on 132-avoiding permutation patterns

Outside nested decompositions and Schur function determinants. Emma Yu Jin

arxiv: v1 [math.co] 31 Mar 2009

maps 1 to 5. Similarly, we compute (1 2)(4 7 8)(2 1)( ) = (1 5 8)(2 4 7).

Notes on the symmetric group

The rth moment of a real-valued random variable X with density f(x) is. x r f(x) dx

Computing Unsatisfiable k-sat Instances with Few Occurrences per Variable

Inversion Formulae on Permutations Avoiding 321

Rises in forests of binary shrubs

The Sorting Index and Permutation Codes. Abstract

GUESSING MODELS IMPLY THE SINGULAR CARDINAL HYPOTHESIS arxiv: v1 [math.lo] 25 Mar 2019

On the h-vector of a Lattice Path Matroid

Computing Unsatisfiable k-sat Instances with Few Occurrences per Variable

The ruin probabilities of a multidimensional perturbed risk model

Strong Subgraph k-connectivity of Digraphs

Palindromic Permutations and Generalized Smarandache Palindromic Permutations

Cumulants and triangles in Erdős-Rényi random graphs

Essays on Some Combinatorial Optimization Problems with Interval Data

arxiv: v2 [math.lo] 13 Feb 2014

Slides III - Complete Markets

Asymptotic Notation. Instructor: Laszlo Babai June 14, 2002

CATEGORICAL SKEW LATTICES

arxiv:physics/ v2 [math-ph] 13 Jan 1997

Continuous images of closed sets in generalized Baire spaces ESI Workshop: Forcing and Large Cardinals

THE NUMBER OF UNARY CLONES CONTAINING THE PERMUTATIONS ON AN INFINITE SET

Extender based forcings, fresh sets and Aronszajn trees

Chapter 5 Finite Difference Methods. Math6911 W07, HM Zhu

Collinear Triple Hypergraphs and the Finite Plane Kakeya Problem

Course Information and Introduction

Variations on a theme by Weetman

Gödel algebras free over finite distributive lattices

Philipp Moritz Lücke

EXTENSIVE AND NORMAL FORM GAMES

FORCING AND THE HALPERN-LÄUCHLI THEOREM. 1. Introduction This document is a continuation of [1]. It is intended to be part of a larger paper.

Interpolation of κ-compactness and PCF

Application of an Interval Backward Finite Difference Method for Solving the One-Dimensional Heat Conduction Problem

Smoothed Analysis of Binary Search Trees

On the Pentagon Relations of Valued Quivers

Permutation Factorizations and Prime Parking Functions

Approximations of Stochastic Programs. Scenario Tree Reduction and Construction

On Packing Densities of Set Partitions

Sequences, Series, and Probability Part I

Chapter 8 Sequences, Series, and the Binomial Theorem

Orthogonality to the value group is the same as generic stability in C-minimal expansions of ACVF

On the Number of Permutations Avoiding a Given Pattern

WEIGHTED SUM OF THE EXTENSIONS OF THE REPRESENTATIONS OF QUADRATIC FORMS

The (λ, κ)-fn and the order theory of bases in boolean algebras

Bounds on coloring numbers

An orderly algorithm to enumerate finite (semi)modular lattices

Chapter 3: Black-Scholes Equation and Its Numerical Evaluation

Risk Measurement in Credit Portfolio Models

Trinomial Tree. Set up a trinomial approximation to the geometric Brownian motion ds/s = r dt + σ dw. a

Interior-Point Algorithm for CLP II. yyye

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.lo] 9 Dec 2006

Conformal Invariance of the Exploration Path in 2D Critical Bond Percolation in the Square Lattice

Scenario reduction and scenario tree construction for power management problems

Math 167: Mathematical Game Theory Instructor: Alpár R. Mészáros

The Semi-Weak Square Principle

Chapter 7: Portfolio Theory

arxiv: v2 [math.lo] 21 Mar 2016

Structural Induction

Lattice Paths and Their Generalizations

On the two-variable Iwasawa theory. Tadashi Ochiai (Osaka University)

Measures of Contribution for Portfolio Risk

"Pricing Exotic Options using Strong Convergence Properties

Sublinear Time Algorithms Oct 19, Lecture 1

COMBINATORICS OF REDUCTIONS BETWEEN EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS

Applied Mathematics Letters

Lecture 4. Finite difference and finite element methods

Factor Saving Innovation

TWO-PERIODIC TERNARY RECURRENCES AND THEIR BINET-FORMULA 1. INTRODUCTION

Part 3: Trust-region methods for unconstrained optimization. Nick Gould (RAL)

Solutions of Bimatrix Coalitional Games

Relations in the tautological ring of the moduli space of curves

ExpTime Tableau Decision Procedures for Regular Grammar Logics with Converse

arxiv: v1 [math.co] 6 Oct 2009

The illustrated zoo of order-preserving functions

Fair semigroups. Valdis Laan. University of Tartu, Estonia. (Joint research with László Márki) 1/19

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.lo] 15 Jan 1991

IB SL EXAM REVIEW and PRACTICE

Managing Default Contagion in Financial Networks

Pricing Default Events: Surprise, Exogeneity and Contagion

3.1 Measures of Central Tendency

Some Bounds for the Singular Values of Matrices

Mean Reversion in Asset Returns and Time Non-Separable Preferences

6.207/14.15: Networks Lecture 10: Introduction to Game Theory 2

Generalising the weak compactness of ω

Strong normalisation and the typed lambda calculus

Heterogeneous Firm, Financial Market Integration and International Risk Sharing

Yao s Minimax Principle

Invariant Variational Problems & Integrable Curve Flows. Peter J. Olver University of Minnesota olver

MITCHELL S THEOREM REVISITED. Contents

The equivariant volumes of the permutahedron

arxiv: v5 [quant-ph] 16 Oct 2008

Secant Varieties, Symbolic Powers, Statistical Models

Lecture 4: Divide and Conquer

Transcription:

Catalan functions and k-schur positivity Jonah Blasiak Drexel University joint work with Jennifer Morse, Anna Pun, and Dan Summers April 2018

Strengthened Macdonald positivity conjecture Theorem (Haiman) The modified Macdonald polynomials are Schur positive: H µ (x; q, t) = λ K λµ (q, t)s λ (x) for K λµ (q, t) N[q, t]. Conjecture (Lapointe-Lascoux-Morse) The atom k-schur functions {A λ (x; t)} λ1 k form a basis for Λ k = span Q(q,t) {H µ (x; q, t)} µ1 k, and are Schur positive; expansion of H µ (x; q, t) Λ k in this basis has coefficients in N[q, t]. Conjecture (Lapointe-Lascoux-Morse) The k + 1-Schur expansion of a k-schur function has coefficients in N[t].

Strengthened Macdonald positivity conjecture Theorem (Haiman) The modified Macdonald polynomials are Schur positive: H µ (x; q, t) = λ K λµ (q, t)s λ (x) for K λµ (q, t) N[q, t]. Conjecture (Lapointe-Lascoux-Morse) The atom k-schur functions {A λ (x; t)} λ1 k form a basis for Λ k = span Q(q,t) {H µ (x; q, t)} µ1 k, and are Schur positive; expansion of H µ (x; q, t) Λ k in this basis has coefficients in N[q, t]. Conjecture (Lapointe-Lascoux-Morse) The k + 1-Schur expansion of a k-schur function has coefficients in N[t].

Strengthened Macdonald positivity conjecture Theorem (Haiman) The modified Macdonald polynomials are Schur positive: H µ (x; q, t) = λ K λµ (q, t)s λ (x) for K λµ (q, t) N[q, t]. Conjecture (Lapointe-Lascoux-Morse) The atom k-schur functions {A λ (x; t)} λ1 k form a basis for Λ k = span Q(q,t) {H µ (x; q, t)} µ1 k, and are Schur positive; expansion of H µ (x; q, t) Λ k in this basis has coefficients in N[q, t]. Conjecture (Lapointe-Lascoux-Morse) The k + 1-Schur expansion of a k-schur function has coefficients in N[t].

Strengthened Macdonald positivity conjecture Example. k = 2 H 1 4 = t 4( s + ts + t 2 s H 211 = t ( s + ts + t 2 s H 22 = ( s + ts + t 2 s ) + ( t 2 + t 3)( s + ts ) + ( 1 + qt 2 )( s + ts ) ( ) + (tq + q) s + ts }{{}}{{} positive sum of q, t-monomials t-positive sum of schur functions ) ( + s + ts ) ( + q s + ts + t 2 s + t 2 s +q 2 (s + ts + t 2 s ) ) )

Strengthened Macdonald positivity conjecture Example. k = 2 H 1 4 = t 4( s + ts + t 2 ) ( s + t 2 + t 3)( ) ( ) s + ts + s + ts + t 2 s H 211 = t ( s + ts + t 2 ) ( s + 1 + qt 2 )( ) ( ) s + ts + q s + ts + t 2 s H 22 = ( s + ts + t 2 ) ( ) ) s + (tq + q) s + ts +q (s 2 + ts + t 2 s }{{}}{{} positive sum of q, t-monomials t-positive sum of schur functions }{{}}{{}}{{} s (2) s (2) s (2) basis for restricted span Λ k of Macdonald polynomials

Conjecturally equivalent definitions of k-schurs Schur basis symmetric positive branching [1998:Lapointe,Lascoux,Morse] Tableaux and katabolism [2003:Lapointe,Morse] Jing vertex operators [2006:Lam,Lapointe,Morse,Shimozono] Bruhat order on type-a affine Weyl group / strong tableaux [2010:Chen,Haiman] GL l (C)-equivariant Euler characteristics / Demazure operators [2012:Assaf,Billey] Quasisymmetric functions [2015:Dalal,Morse] Inverting affine Kostka matrix

Overview The k-schur functions appear in the study of Macdonald polynomials, the homology of the affine Grassmannian, graded representations of the symmetric group. Prior work on the branching rule: Geometric proof at t = 1 (Lam 2011). Formula for branching at t = 1 as equivalence classes on the k-shape poset (Lam-Lapointe-Morse-Shimozono 2013). Main results: Strong tableaux k-schur functions form a Schur positive basis for Λ k. (Branching rule) positive combinatorial formula for the k + 1-Schur expansion of k-schur functions. Strong tableaux k-schur functions agree with a Catalan function definition of Chen-Haiman.

Overview The k-schur functions appear in the study of Macdonald polynomials, the homology of the affine Grassmannian, graded representations of the symmetric group. Prior work on the branching rule: Geometric proof at t = 1 (Lam 2011). Formula for branching at t = 1 as equivalence classes on the k-shape poset (Lam-Lapointe-Morse-Shimozono 2013). Main results: Strong tableaux k-schur functions form a Schur positive basis for Λ k. (Branching rule) positive combinatorial formula for the k + 1-Schur expansion of k-schur functions. Strong tableaux k-schur functions agree with a Catalan function definition of Chen-Haiman.

Overview The k-schur functions appear in the study of Macdonald polynomials, the homology of the affine Grassmannian, graded representations of the symmetric group. Prior work on the branching rule: Geometric proof at t = 1 (Lam 2011). Formula for branching at t = 1 as equivalence classes on the k-shape poset (Lam-Lapointe-Morse-Shimozono 2013). Main results: Strong tableaux k-schur functions form a Schur positive basis for Λ k. (Branching rule) positive combinatorial formula for the k + 1-Schur expansion of k-schur functions. Strong tableaux k-schur functions agree with a Catalan function definition of Chen-Haiman.

Conjecturally equivalent definitions of k-schurs Schur basis symmetric positive branching [1998:Lapointe,Lascoux,Morse] Tableaux and katabolism [2003:Lapointe,Morse] Jing vertex operators [2006:Lam,Lapointe,Morse,Shimozono] Bruhat order on type-a affine Weyl group / strong tableaux [2010:Chen,Haiman] Catalan functions [2012:Assaf,Billey] Quasisymmetric functions [2015:Dalal,Morse] Inverting affine Kostka matrix [2018:B,Morse,Pun,Summers] Strong tableaux = Catalan functions

k-bounded partitions and k + 1-cores Def. A k-bounded partition is a partition with parts of size k. Def. A k + 1-core is a partition whose diagram has no box with hook length k + 1. Proposition. There is a bijection κ p(κ) from k + 1-cores to k-bounded partitions. Example. k = 4. 14 12 9 7 6 4 3 2 1 9 7 4 2 1 6 4 1 4 2 3 1 1 κ p(κ) Def. The k-skew diagram of a k + 1-core κ is the skew shape obtained by removing boxes of hook length > k.

k-bounded partitions and k + 1-cores Def. A k-bounded partition is a partition with parts of size k. Def. A k + 1-core is a partition whose diagram has no box with hook length k + 1. Proposition. There is a bijection κ p(κ) from k + 1-cores to k-bounded partitions. Example. k = 4. 14 12 9 7 6 4 3 2 1 9 7 4 2 1 6 4 1 4 2 3 1 1 κ p(κ) Def. The k-skew diagram of a k + 1-core κ is the skew shape obtained by removing boxes of hook length > k.

k-bounded partitions and k + 1-cores Def. A k-bounded partition is a partition with parts of size k. Def. A k + 1-core is a partition whose diagram has no box with hook length k + 1. Proposition. There is a bijection κ p(κ) from k + 1-cores to k-bounded partitions. Example. k = 4. 4 3 2 1 4 2 1 4 1 4 2 3 1 1 k-skew(κ) p(κ) Def. The k-skew diagram of a k + 1-core κ is the skew shape obtained by removing boxes of hook length > k.

Strong covers Def. An inclusion τ κ of k + 1-cores is a strong cover, denoted τ κ, if p(τ) + 1 = p(κ). Example. Strong cover with k = 4: corresponding k-skew diagrams: = = p(τ) = 332221111 p(κ) = 222222221

Strong covers Def. An inclusion τ κ of k + 1-cores is a strong cover, denoted τ κ, if p(τ) + 1 = p(κ). Example. Strong cover with k = 4: corresponding k-skew diagrams: = = p(τ) = 332221111 p(κ) = 222222221

Strong marked covers r Def. A strong marked cover τ == κ is a strong cover τ κ together with a positive integer r which is allowed to be the smallest row index of any connected component of the skew shape κ/τ. Example. The two possible markings of the previous strong cover: τ 6 == κ τ 3 == κ

Def. spin ( τ Spin r == κ ) = c (h 1) + N, where c = number of connected components of κ/τ, h = height (number of rows) of each component, N = number of components below the marked one. Example. τ 6 == κ τ 3 == κ spin = 4 spin = 5 spin = c (h 1) + N = 2 (3 1) + 0 = 4 spin = 2 (3 1) + 1 = 5

Vertical strong marked tableaux Def. A vertical strong marked tableau T of weight η = (η 1, η 2,... ) is a sequence κ (0) r == 1 κ (1) r == 2 r == m κ (m) such that r vi +1 < r vi +2 < < r vi +η i for all i, where v i := η 1 + + η i 1. inside(t ) := p(κ (0) ) outside(t ) := p(κ (m) ) Example. For k = 4, a vertical strong marked tableau of weight (5): 5 5 κ (4) 5 == κ (5) 5

Vertical strong marked tableaux Def. A vertical strong marked tableau T of weight η = (η 1, η 2,... ) is a sequence κ (0) r == 1 κ (1) r == 2 r == m κ (m) such that r vi +1 < r vi +2 < < r vi +η i for all i, where v i := η 1 + + η i 1. inside(t ) := p(κ (0) ) outside(t ) := p(κ (m) ) Example. For k = 4, a vertical strong marked tableau of weight (5): 4 4 κ (3) 4 == κ (4)

Vertical strong marked tableaux Def. A vertical strong marked tableau T of weight η = (η 1, η 2,... ) is a sequence κ (0) r == 1 κ (1) r == 2 r == m κ (m) such that r vi +1 < r vi +2 < < r vi +η i for all i, where v i := η 1 + + η i 1. inside(t ) := p(κ (0) ) outside(t ) := p(κ (m) ) Example. For k = 4, a vertical strong marked tableau of weight (5): 3 3 κ (2) 3 == κ (3) 3

Vertical strong marked tableaux Def. A vertical strong marked tableau T of weight η = (η 1, η 2,... ) is a sequence κ (0) r == 1 κ (1) r == 2 r == m κ (m) such that r vi +1 < r vi +2 < < r vi +η i for all i, where v i := η 1 + + η i 1. inside(t ) := p(κ (0) ) outside(t ) := p(κ (m) ) Example. For k = 4, a vertical strong marked tableau of weight (5): 2 2 2 2 κ (1) 2 == κ (2)

Vertical strong marked tableaux Def. A vertical strong marked tableau T of weight η = (η 1, η 2,... ) is a sequence κ (0) r == 1 κ (1) r == 2 r == m κ (m) such that r vi +1 < r vi +2 < < r vi +η i for all i, where v i := η 1 + + η i 1. inside(t ) := p(κ (0) ) outside(t ) := p(κ (m) ) Example. For k = 4, a vertical strong marked tableau of weight (5): 1 κ (0) 1 == κ (1)

Vertical strong marked tableaux Def. A vertical strong marked tableau T of weight η = (η 1, η 2,... ) is a sequence κ (0) r == 1 κ (1) r == 2 r == m κ (m) such that r vi +1 < r vi +2 < < r vi +η i for all i, where v i := η 1 + + η i 1. inside(t ) := p(κ (0) ) outside(t ) := p(κ (m) ) Example. For k = 4, a vertical strong marked tableau of weight (5): 3 5 2 2 2 4 2 3 5 4 1 3 5

Spin k-schur functions We work in the ring of symmetric functions in infinitely many variables x = (x 1, x 2,... ). SMT k η(µ) = set of strong marked tableaux T of weight η with outside(t ) = µ. spin(t ) = sum of the spins of the strong marked covers comprising T. Def. For a k-bounded partition µ, let s µ (k) (x; t) = η Z 0, η = µ T SMT k η(µ) t spin(t ) x η. Their t = 1 specializations agree with another combinatorial definition using weak tableaux (Lam-Lapointe-Morse-Shimozono 2010), are Schubert classes in the homology of the affine Grassmannian Gr SLk+1 of SL k+1 (Lam 2008).

Spin k-schur functions We work in the ring of symmetric functions in infinitely many variables x = (x 1, x 2,... ). SMT k η(µ) = set of strong marked tableaux T of weight η with outside(t ) = µ. spin(t ) = sum of the spins of the strong marked covers comprising T. Def. For a k-bounded partition µ, let s µ (k) (x; t) = η Z 0, η = µ T SMT k η(µ) t spin(t ) x η. Their t = 1 specializations agree with another combinatorial definition using weak tableaux (Lam-Lapointe-Morse-Shimozono 2010), are Schubert classes in the homology of the affine Grassmannian Gr SLk+1 of SL k+1 (Lam 2008).

Properties of k-schur functions Theorem (B.-Morse-Pun-Summers) The k-schur functions {s (k) µ µ is k-bounded of length l} satisfy (vertical dual Pieri rule) (shift invariance) e d s(k) µ = s (k) µ = e l s(k+1) µ+1 l, T VSMT k (d) (µ) t spin(t ) s (k) inside(t ), (Schur function stability) if k µ, then s (k) µ = s µ. e d End(Λ) is defined by e d (g), h = g, e dh for all g, h Λ. VSMT k η(µ) = set of vertical strong marked tableaux T of weight η with outside(t ) = µ.

k-schur branching rule Theorem (B.-Morse-Pun-Summers) For µ a k-bounded partition of length l, the expansion of the k-schur function s (k) µ into k + 1-Schur functions is given by s (k) µ = T VSMT k+1 (l) (µ+1l ) t spin(t ) s (k+1) inside(t ). Proof. The shift invariance property followed by the vertical dual Pieri rule yields s (k) µ = e l s(k+1) µ+1 l = T VSMT k+1 (l) (µ+1l ) t spin(t ) s (k+1) inside(t ).

k-schur branching rule Theorem (B.-Morse-Pun-Summers) For µ a k-bounded partition of length l, the expansion of the k-schur function s (k) µ into k + 1-Schur functions is given by s (k) µ = T VSMT k+1 (l) (µ+1l ) t spin(t ) s (k+1) inside(t ). Proof. The shift invariance property followed by the vertical dual Pieri rule yields s (k) µ = e l s(k+1) µ+1 l = T VSMT k+1 (l) (µ+1l ) t spin(t ) s (k+1) inside(t ).

k-schur branching rule s (3) 22221 = t2 s (4) 3222 + t 2 s (4) 3321 + t 2 s (4) 33111 + s (4) 22221 1 3 5 2 2 2 4 2 3 5 4 3 5 1 3 5 2 4 1 3 5 2 4 3 5 1 3 3 5 2 4 1 3 3 5 2 4 5 1 3 3 5 2 2 4 3 3 5 4 5 VSMT 4 (5) (33332)

k-schur branching rule s (3) 22221 = t2 s (4) 3222 + t 2 s (4) 3321 + t 2 s (4) 33111 + s (4) 22221 1 3 5 2 2 2 4 2 3 5 4 3 5 1 3 5 2 4 1 3 5 2 4 3 5 1 3 3 5 2 4 1 3 3 5 2 4 5 1 3 3 5 2 2 4 3 3 5 4 5 VSMT 4 (5) (33332) T = 1 3 5 2 2 2 4 2 3 5 4 3 5 spin(t ) = 0 + 1 + 1 + 0 + 0 = 2 inside(t ) = 3222 outside(t ) = 33332

Root ideals Set of positive roots + := { (i, j) 1 i < j l }. Ψ + is an upper order ideal of positive roots. Example. Ψ = {(1, 3), (1, 4), (1, 5), (1, 6), (2, 5), (2, 6), (3, 6)} (1, 3) (1, 4) (1, 5) (1, 6) (2, 5) (2, 6) (3, 6)

Catalan functions Def. (Panyushev, Chen-Haiman) Ψ + is an upper order ideal of positive roots, γ Z l. The Catalan function indexed by Ψ and γ: Hγ Ψ (x; t) := (1 tr ij ) 1 s γ (x) (i, j) Ψ where the raising operator R ij acts by R ij (s γ (x)) = s γ+ɛi ɛ j (x). Example. Let µ = (µ 1,..., µ l ) be a partition. Empty root set: H µ (x; t) = s µ (x). Full root set: H + µ (x; t) = H µ (x; t), the modified Hall-Littlewood polynomial.

Catalan functions Def. (Panyushev, Chen-Haiman) Ψ + is an upper order ideal of positive roots, γ Z l. The Catalan function indexed by Ψ and γ: Hγ Ψ (x; t) := (1 tr ij ) 1 s γ (x) (i, j) Ψ where the raising operator R ij acts by R ij (s γ (x)) = s γ+ɛi ɛ j (x). Example. Let µ = (µ 1,..., µ l ) be a partition. Empty root set: H µ (x; t) = s µ (x). Full root set: H + µ (x; t) = H µ (x; t), the modified Hall-Littlewood polynomial.

k-schur Catalan functions Def. For µ a k-bounded partition of length l, define the root ideal and the Catalan function k (µ) = {(i, j) + k µ i + i < j}, s (k) µ (x; t) := H k (µ) µ = l l i=1 j=k+1 µ i +i ( 1 trij ) 1sµ (x). # nonroots in row i = k µ i

Example. k = 4, µ = 3321. Examples of Catalan functions 1, 3 1, 4 k (µ) = 2, 4 s (k) µ (x; t) = (i, j) k (µ) (1 tr ij ) 1 s µ (x)

Example. k = 4, µ = 3321. Examples of Catalan functions 1, 3 1, 4 k (µ) = 2, 4 s (k) µ (x; t) = (i, j) k (µ) (1 tr ij ) 1 s µ (x) = (1 tr 13 ) 1 (1 tr 24 ) 1 (1 tr 14 ) 1 s 3321 (x)

Example. k = 4, µ = 3321. Examples of Catalan functions 1, 3 1, 4 k (µ) = 2, 4 s (k) µ (x; t) = (i, j) k (µ) (1 tr ij ) 1 s µ (x) = (1 tr 13 ) 1 (1 tr 24 ) 1 (1 tr 14 ) 1 s 3321 (x) = s 3321 + t(s 3420 + s 4311 + s 4320 ) + t 2 (s 4410 + s 5301 + s 5310 ) + t 3 (s 63 11 + s 5400 + s 6300 ) + t 4 (s 64 10 + s 73 10 )

Example. k = 4, µ = 3321. Examples of Catalan functions 1, 3 1, 4 k (µ) = 2, 4 s (k) µ (x; t) = (i, j) k (µ) (1 tr ij ) 1 s µ (x) = (1 tr 13 ) 1 (1 tr 24 ) 1 (1 tr 14 ) 1 s 3321 (x) = s 3321 + t(s 3420 + s 4311 + s 4320 ) + t 2 (s 4410 + s 5301 + s 5310 ) + t 3 (s 63 11 + s 5400 + s 6300 ) + t 4 (s 64 10 + s 73 10 ) = s 3321 + t(s 4320 + s 4311 ) + t 2 (s 4410 + s 5310 ) + t 3 s 5400.

Chen-Haiman conjecture Theorem (B.-Morse-Pun-Summers) For any k-bounded partition µ, the k-schur function s (k) µ (x; t) is the Catalan function s (k) µ (x; t).

k-schur into Schur Theorem (B.-Morse-Pun-Summers) Let µ be a k-bounded partition of length l and set m = max( µ k, 0). The Schur expansion the k-schur function s µ (k) is given by s (k) µ = T VSMT k+m (l m ) (µ+ml ) t spin(t ) s inside(t ). Proof. Applying the shift invariance property m times followed by the vertical dual Pieri rule, we obtain s (k) µ = (e l )m s (k+m) µ+m l = T VSMT k+m (l m ) (µ+ml ) t spin(t ) s inside(t ). The Schur function stability property ensures this is the Schur function decomposition.

k-schur into Schur Theorem (B.-Morse-Pun-Summers) Let µ be a k-bounded partition of length l and set m = max( µ k, 0). The Schur expansion the k-schur function s µ (k) is given by s (k) µ = T VSMT k+m (l m ) (µ+ml ) t spin(t ) s inside(t ). Proof. Applying the shift invariance property m times followed by the vertical dual Pieri rule, we obtain s (k) µ = (e l )m s (k+m) µ+m l = T VSMT k+m (l m ) (µ+ml ) t spin(t ) s inside(t ). The Schur function stability property ensures this is the Schur function decomposition.

Schur expansion of s (1) 111 = H 111 1 2 4 4 5 6 1 2 4 4 5 6 3 5 6 1 1 2 4 4 5 6 2 4 4 5 6 3 5 6 1 3 4 5 5 5 6 2 5 5 5 6 1 3 6 1 1 3 4 5 5 5 6 2 5 5 5 6 3 6 t 3 s 3 t 2 s 21 t s 21 s 111 s (1) 111 = t3 s 3 + t 2 s 21 + ts 21 + s 111 The Schur expansion of the 1-Schur function s (1) 111 is obtained by summing t spin(t ) s inside(t ) over the set VSMT 3 (3,3)(3, 3, 3) of vertical strong marked tableaux T given above.

Schur function straightening Schur functions may be defined for any γ Z l. The Schur function s γ (x 1, x 2,..., x l ) = s γ (x) is straightened as follows: { sgn(γ + ρ)s sort(γ+ρ) ρ (x) if γ + ρ has distinct nonnegative parts, s γ (x) = 0 otherwise, sort(β) = weakly decreasing sequence obtained by sorting β, sgn(β) = sign of the shortest permutation taking β to sort(β). Example. l = 4, γ = 3125. γ + ρ = (3, 1, 2, 5) + (3, 2, 1, 0) = (6, 3, 3, 5) has a repeated part. Hence s 3125 (x) = 0.

Schur function straightening Schur functions may be defined for any γ Z l. The Schur function s γ (x 1, x 2,..., x l ) = s γ (x) is straightened as follows: { sgn(γ + ρ)s sort(γ+ρ) ρ (x) if γ + ρ has distinct nonnegative parts, s γ (x) = 0 otherwise, sort(β) = weakly decreasing sequence obtained by sorting β, sgn(β) = sign of the shortest permutation taking β to sort(β). Example. l = 4, γ = 3125. γ + ρ = (3, 1, 2, 5) + (3, 2, 1, 0) = (6, 3, 3, 5) has a repeated part. Hence s 3125 (x) = 0.

Schur function straightening Schur functions may be defined for any γ Z l. The Schur function s γ (x 1, x 2,..., x l ) = s γ (x) is straightened as follows: { sgn(γ + ρ)s sort(γ+ρ) ρ (x) if γ + ρ has distinct nonnegative parts, s γ (x) = 0 otherwise, sort(β) = weakly decreasing sequence obtained by sorting β, sgn(β) = sign of the shortest permutation taking β to sort(β). Example. l = 4, γ = 4716. γ + ρ = (4, 7, 1, 6) + (3, 2, 1, 0) = (7, 9, 2, 6) sort(γ + ρ) = (9, 7, 6, 2) sort(γ + ρ) ρ = (6, 5, 5, 2) Hence s 4716 (x) = s 6552 (x).