SUSTAINABLE PROFIT IN AGRICULTURE I AN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON

Similar documents
Denmark. Sources: European Commission, Eurostat, and Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs. Updated: M ay 2018

FULL-YEAR RESULTS 2017

Netherlands. May 2018 Statistical Factsheet

Italy. May 2018 Statistical Factsheet

Austria. May 2018 Statistical Factsheet

Estonia. May 2018 Statistical Factsheet

France. May 2018 Statistical Factsheet

Greece. Sources: European Commission, Eurostat, and Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs. Updated: M ay 2018

Statistical Factsheet. France CONTENTS. Main figures - Year 2016

Statistical Factsheet. Belgium CONTENTS. Main figures - Year 2016

Statistical Factsheet. Italy CONTENTS. Main figures - Year 2016

Statistical Factsheet. Lithuania CONTENTS. Main figures - Year 2016

Farm Business Analysis Ch.18

Credit Risk Sydbank Group

ROS AGRO financial results for 12M 2017 and Q4 2017

ROS AGRO financial results for 12M 2016 and Q4 2016

ROS AGRO financial results for Q1 2017

Jyske Bank. Navigating the Nordics Seminar 31 May 2017

NEWS RELEASE. Deere Announces Third-Quarter Earnings of $642 Million

Annual Report 2016 page 2

Credit Risk Sydbank Group

Understand Financial Statements and Identify Sources of Farm Financial Risk

ROS AGRO financial results for 9M 2017 and Q3 2017

Risk management strategy as a success factor

ROS AGRO financial results for 9M 2018 and Q3 2018

Jyske Bank Q April 2016

NEWS RELEASE. Deere Announces Record First-Quarter Earnings of $681 Million. Contact: Ken Golden Director, Global Public Relations

The Common Agricultural Policy

NEWS RELEASE. Deere Announces First-Quarter Earnings of $194 Million

Interim Report as at 30 June 2016 Page 2

Interim report Q1 2018

( ) Page: 1/28 ACCESSION OF KAZAKHSTAN DOMESTIC SUPPORT AND EXPORT SUBSIDIES IN THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR. Revision

WTO Commitments and Support to Agriculture: Experience from Canada

NEWS RELEASE. Deere Announces Third-Quarter Earnings of $851 Million. Contact: Ken Golden Director, Global Public Relations

Food Processing and Meat Technology to Brazil

ANNEX CAP evolution and introduction of direct payments

ROS AGRO financial results for 1H 2018 and Q2 2018

ROS AGRO financial results for Q1 2018

ANNEX CAP evolution and introduction of direct payments

HALF-YEAR REPORT 2016/17. Leverandørselskabet Danish Crown AmbA. CVR no

Net profit of DKK 838 million and ROE of 10.7 % Presentation of Spar Nord s financial results for 2016

Sydbank s Interim Report First Half 2016

Deere Announces Record Fourth-Quarter Earnings of $807 Million

4Q 2017 Earnings Call. 22 November 2017

Cary L. Sandell. Wells Fargo Food and Agribusiness Group

Interim report Q3 2018

Interim report H1 2018

The Weekly Focus. A Market and Economic Update 3 April 2017

Fourth Quarter 2011 Earnings Conference Call. 23 November 2011

Macroeconomic Outlook: Implications for Agriculture. It has been 26 years since we have experienced a significant recession

Loan Portfolio Analysis. Agribusiness Finance LESE 306 Fall 2009

Second Quarter 2011 Earnings Conference Call. 18 May 2011

Cherkizovo Group OJSC ("Cherkizovo" or "the Group" or "the Company") Financial results for the Year Ending December 31, 2013

2Q 2018 Earnings Call. 18 May 2018

Global farm recession, weak construction-equipment markets lead to lower sales and earnings for quarter and six months.

Jyske Bank in brief 3

ROS AGRO financial results for 12M 2014 and Q4 2014

ODAP-S. Ontario Data Analysis Project - Swine FARM SUMMARY. For 2002 Tax Year. Prepared by: Lynn Marchand. Economics and Business Section

Click to edit Master title style. Credit Analysis. Assessing the Risk Profile of a. Pork Production Company

INSIGHTS FROM AGRICULTURAL LENDERS. January 11 th, 2019 Top Farmer Conference Beck Agricultural Center Dr. Brady Brewer

3Q 2018 Earnings Call. 17 August 2018

Report on the distribution of direct payments to agricultural producers (financial year 2016)

ROS AGRO PLC. Investor Presentation. 9M2018 and Q November 2018

Ros Agro financial results for 1H 2013 and Q2 2013

ANNEXURE-I QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FARMERS

L AGENT OU L AGENTE DOIT REMETTRE DEUX COPIES DE CE FORMULAIRE À LA PERSONNE REQUÉRANTE. Assessment of farm operations

NEWS RELEASE. Ken Golden Director, Global Public Relations Deere & Company Deere Reports First-Quarter Income of $498 Million

NEWS RELEASE. Deere Reports Second-Quarter Net Income of $1.208 Billion

Deere Reports Earnings of $510 Million for Fourth Quarter and $2.159 Billion for Year

Annual report FirstFarms A/S Majsmarken 1 DK-7190 Billund. CVR: Registered office: Billund

Annual Report. GOODVALLEY ANNUAL REPORT 2018 Page 1

Jyske Bank. Danske Bank Danish Banking Seminar 14 March 2017

Alm Brand. Results for Q2 2014

Fourth Quarter 2016 Earnings Conference Call. 23 November 2016

INTERIM MANAGEMENT REPORT

Second Quarter 2010 Earnings Conference Call. 19 May 2010

Sydbank s Interim Report Q1-Q3 2018

Sydbank s Interim Report Q1 2018

Jyske Bank Q August 2016

Solid net profit of DKK 690 million yields an annualized 11.9 % return on equity full-year guidance raised

ROS AGRO PLC. Investors Presentation. 1H 2018 and Q August 2018

Jyske Bank Q October 2017

Farm funding models and business structures in Australia

Annual Financial Statements as per 31 December Press Conference

Prepare, print, and e-file your federal tax return for free!

(University Roma Tre )

Second Quarter 2016 Earnings Conference Call. 20 May 2016

Annual Report 2015 page 2

Sri Lanka Accounting Standard-LKAS 41. Agriculture

ROS AGRO financial results for the year 2013 and Q4 2013

ODAP-S. Ontario Data Analysis Project - Swine FARM SUMMARY. For 2003 Tax Year. Prepared by: Lynn Marchand. Economics and Business Section

Interim Report First Half 2014 Press Conference

Borrower s Financial Glossary The Carrot Project

D E E R E & C O M P A N Y (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Jyske Bank Q /32

NEWS RELEASE. Deere Announces Third-Quarter Net Income of $910 Million

Solid net profit of DKK 690 million yields an annualized 11.9 % return on equity full-year guidance raised

Inflation projection of the National Bank of Poland based on the NECMOD model

A LARGER AND SIMPLER BANK. Presentation of Spar Nord s Full-Year Results 2012

Jyske Bank Q August 2017

Transcription:

SLU conference December 14th 2015 by/ Klaus Kaiser Chief Business Economics, SEGES Denmark SUSTAINABLE PROFIT IN AGRICULTURE I AN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON AGRICULTURE IN DENMARK PROFIT AND PROFITABILITY

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR Agriculture and food cluster: Global leading position as regards food safety, research and education, technology and production efficiency Exporting for more than 150 bill. DKK Provides approx. 6 % of the total gross domestic product in Denmark Employes approx. 160,000 people Creator of work and considerable income for the rural areas

1.000 800 600 DANISH AGRICULTURE UNDER A LOT OF STRESS DURING THE LAST 10 YEARS Changed and reduced EU-Support Liberalisation of agricultural law Operating result, full time farmers Financial crisis and credit crunch Financial crisis squeezes production and leads to price increases China withdraws partly from the world market Milk qoutas removed 400 1.000 DKK 200 0 Rusia import ban of EU food articles -200-400 At present 7 out of 10 farms are running at losses -600 Constant prices Current prices

FINANCIAL CRISIS Profit/loss on financial contracts per farm 500 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Mill. DKK -500-1.000-1.500-2.000

THE TERMS OF TRADE IS EXPECTED TO REACH A BOTTOM BY 2015/16 Terms of trade Index 2011 = 100 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 All Milk Pigs Plants

OPERATING RESULTS OF THE PRODUCTION BRANCHES Substantial differences in the operating results of the production branches Operating results 2012 2016 Full time farms Cattle Crops Pigs Mink 3500 3000 3.071 3.289 2500 2000 1.911 DKK 1,000 1500 1000 500 0 799 731 368 121 144 192 475 684 118 211 687 506 349 287 288 928 343 91 73 1.025 1.232 500 327 1000 2012 2013 2014* 2015* 2016*

FORECAST FOR BEST THIRD The best third earns an average of about 1.1 mill. DKK in 2014-16 Plants: 0.6-0.9 mill. dkk Milk: 0.9-1.2 mill. dkk Slaugther pigs: 0.8-1.1 mill. dkk Weaners: 1.2-1.6 mill. dkk Full time farms Best third 2500 2.163 2.106 2000 DKK 1,000 1500 1000 799 731 745 1.515 1.391 934 895 500 436 368 0 30 121 144 Avg. 2004 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014* 2015* 2016*

LONG TERM FORECAST All All ex. mink Plants Milk Pigs 1.000 kr. Slaugther pigs Weaners Mink Operating result 494 421 330 498 442 297 662 1.021 Liquidity before investments 817 806 730 844 851 650 1.086 898 Return on invested capital 3,1% 2,8% 2,2% 3,1% 3,0% 2,6% 3,6% 7,7% 900 800 Operating result for full time farmers Historic results Forecast Long term 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015* 2016* 2017* Langsigtet**

LIQUIDITY Cronical deficit measured by the liquidity after investments continues even with a low level of investments Gives evidens of a struktural income crisis Liquidity after investments per farm 2011 2012 2013 2014* 2015* 2016* 0 100 200 1.000 DKK 300 400 309 405 346 500 468 600 700 Total liquidity deficit in 2015 and 2016: About 6-7 bill. DKK (about 900 mill. EUR) 582 613

LIQUIDITY 4,00 Share of milk producers with positive liquidity 3,50 DKK per kilo milk 3,00 2,50 Long term price level 2,00 Actual price 1,50 1,00 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Share of milk producers

LIQUIDITY 18 Share of pig producers with positive liquidity 16 DKK per kilo pig meat 14 12 10 Long term price level 8 6 Actual price 4 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Share of PIG producers

FARMERS DEBT Average debt percentage: 64 10 percent of the farmers are technical insolvent The debt burdens the bottom line and makes the industry extremely interest rate sensitive 400 Agricultural debt 350 300 250 Bill. DKK 200 150 100 50 0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total agricultural debt Full time farm debt

HEAVY NEED FOR CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP 8-9 % of full-time farms (about 1.000 units) need to be closed down for economic reasons Approx. 5-6 % of the full-time farms (about 630 units) and even more small farms will cease to exist within a short period of time due to high age (over 65 years) Added to these are the ownership transfers made out of free will/wish 40,0 35,0 Procent of full time farmers 30,0 25,0 20,0 15,0 10,0 5,0 0,0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2013 2014 Over 60 Over 65 Over 70

AGRICULTURAL INVESTMENT 35,0 Total investment 30,0 25,0 Bill. DKK 20,0 15,0 10,0 5,0 Land Environment, animal welth, competitiveness Reinvestments 0,0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Other investments Land investments

DIFFICULT ACCESS TO FINANCING AND CAPITAL About 36 percent of the farmers experience financial restrains 46 Financial restrain 44 42 40 Procent 38 36 34 32 30 1. halvår 2010 1. halvår 2011 1. halvår 2012 1. halvår 2013 1. halvår 2014 1. halvår 2015

LAND PRICES Prices are now around fair value/production value but the current crisis contains a risk Regional prices on land 300.000 250.000 200.000 150.000 All country Sealand Fyn South Jutland East Jutland Vest Jutland North Jutland 100.000 50.000 2000K4 2001K2 2001K4 2002K2 2002K4 2003K2 2003K4 2004K2 2004K4 2005K2 2005K4 2006K2 2006K4 2007K2 2007K4 2008K2 2008K4 2009K2 2009K4 2010K2 2010K4 2011K2 2011K4 2012K2 2012K4 2013K2 2013K4 2014K2 2014K4 2015K2 DKK per hectare

THE BIGGEST ECONOMIC CHALLENGES FOR THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR 1. Current as well as structural earnings crisis and unstable income 2. Debts are too high 3. Heavy need of ownership changes 4. Investments are (too) low 5. Difficult or no access to credit

THE BIGGEST ECONOMIC CHALLENGES FOR THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR Credit crisis Need for changing owners Ustable income Current og structurel earnings crisis Investment crisis Debt crisis

SLU conference December 14th 2015 by/ Klaus Kaiser Chief Business Economics, SEGES Denmark SUSTAINABLE PROFIT IN AGRICULTURE II AN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON STRATEGIES FOR SUSTAINABLE PROFIT AND PROFITABILITY - DENMARK

EARNINGS HAS TO INCREASE Better market conditions Earnings crisis Management, productivity and efficiency Better business terms

Advisory fields and tools Strategic advisory tools Screening Credit rating Benchmarking Accounts, balance sheets and budgeting Price and income forecasts Financial management Risk management Crisis management Legal counseling Change of ownership and types of ownership Investments Pension Tax IT 21...

MANAGEMENT THROUGH THE CONCEPT OF DYNAMIC STRATEGY A tool to take a structured and systematic strategic view Mapping out the business to get an overview: Production Animal Stock Crop Farming Other Production Machinery Manpower Type of Ownership Environmental restrictions/approvals 22... 15. december 2015

23... MANAGEMENT THROUGH THE CONCEPT OF DYNAMIC STRATEGY Strategic objectives of the company, fx. Consolidation Expansion Improvement of efficiency Reduction of financial risk Start of related activities (energy production, real estate among others) Intercompany resource requirements to assets, competencies, financial resources etc. to achieve the company goals Interaction with the surrounding community Coherence between long-term goals and daily management Action Plans and Gantt Maps Ongoing adjustments to adopt to changed conditions of business and/or community Communication with all the stakeholders of the company Investors and financial partners Suppliers Employees Etc. 15. december 2015

RISK MANAGEMENT Defined as factors at risk of threatening the company goals and/or generating an economic loss Mapping out potential risks, any possible interaction between them, implement and evaluate the risk management Quantify the risks Production risk production interruptions due to Supply of production input Machinery Crop or livestock disease Weather Employees available manpower, employee competencies Own age, disease, accident, divorce etc. Market risk Product prices (output and input prices) Land prices Financial risk Interest rates Currencies Institutional risk Legislation relating to environment and animal welfare Farm Bill 24... 15. december 2015

CRISIS: TIME TO IMPROVE Often you see an improvement in productivity og cost efficiency when earnings decrease in the pig industry 2013 to 2014: Production increases but cost decrease: Farms have become bigger No. of standard hours and no. of animal units increased by 2.4 % and 4.5 %, respectively without a cost increase on the contrary! Capacity costs and total costs decreased by 1.7 % and 5.1 %, respectively Operating income and pigs per sow 1.500.000 5,0 1.000.000 4,5 4,0 DKK 500.000 0-500.000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 3,5 3,0 2,5 2,0 1,5 Percent change Y7Y -1.000.000 1,0 0,5-1.500.000 0,0 Operating income Pigs per sow, percent change y/y, rhs

MILK PRODUCTIVITY HAS IMPROVED Productivity has increased in milk production: Milk production per cow has increased by 2.6 % i 2013 and 4.4 % in 2014 This improves the long-term earnings capacity Milk production and productivity Kilo milk per cow 10.000 9.800 9.600 9.400 9.200 9.000 8.800 8.600 8.400 8.200 5 4 3 2 1 0-1 -2 Percent change y/y 8.000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014-3 Kilo milk per cow Change in %, rhs

POSITIVE PROSPECTS FOR 2016 AND 2017 The improvement in productivity and cost efficiency paves the way for the agricultural sector in terms of an improved opportunity of profiting from the market conditions, once prices recover. All in all the agricultural sector will se improvement in earnings i 2016 and 2017: An improvement of the underlying agricultural economy Global production adjustments Continued low interest rates and possibly a stronger USD New governmental agreement of an agricultural package

THERE IS A PACKET COMING!

SCREENING ACCESS TO CREDIT BENCHMARKING

ASSUMPTIONS FOR THE AGRICULTURAL ECONOMIC SUSTAINABILITY Product prices Estimated long-term price levels (incl. corrective payment): Pork: 11.00 dkk/kg. Milk: 2.5 dkk/kg. Organic extra: 0.75 dkk/l Cereal (wheat): 120 dkk/hkg. Mink fur: 350 dkk/fur Soy: 270 dkk/hkg. Beef meat 23.91 dkk/kg. Rape seed: 240 dkk/hkg. Potatoes: C: 50, I: 80 Eggs: 0.969 dkk/unit Poultry: 6.80 dkk/kg. Diesel: 6.50 dkk/l Fertilizer: Index 175 A.o. Finansing/interest incl. costs Mortgage DKK variable: 2.70 % Mortgage Foreign Currency variable: 2.60 % Mortgage DKK fixed: 4.50 % Bank: 6.25 % Overdraft facility: 7.75 % Foreign loan: 6.25 % EU funding Reduction according to CAP2020. Instalment Investments Amortization-free loan corr. to value of land and livestock. Repayment/reinvestments on the remaining loans correponding to depreciation. Land, buildings and inventory etc. Book value. Own Remuneration Withdrawals for private spending, income tax and savings. Spouse/Husband income Included in liquidity. Extraordinary conditions Adjustment for extraordinary items (fx. Value changes of livestock and supplies, unusual harvest yields etc.)

ECONOMIC STRENGTH OF THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR Debt High debt Liquidity deficit High debt Liquidity surplus 70 % Low debt Liquidity deficit Low debt Liquidity surplus Liquidity deficit Liquidity surplus

ECONOMIC STRENGTH OF THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR High debt Liquidity deficit Number: 1.600 Share: 14,4 % High debt Liquidity surplus Number: 2.884 Share: 25,9 % High debt (4.484 / 40,3 %) 70 % Low debt Liquidity deficit Number: 1.704 Share: 15,3 % Low debt Liquidity surplus Number: 4.954 Share: 44,5 % Low debt (6.658 / 59,7 %) Liquidity deficit (3.304 / 29,7 %) Liquidity surplus (7.838 / 70,3 %)

ECONOMIC STRENGTH - SELECTED CHARACTARISTICS Debt 70 % High debt Liquidity deficit Number: 1.600 Share: 14,4 % Production: 16,1 % Total debt: 55,2 mia. Bank debt: 16,8 mia. Share effective: 29,7 % Age: 46,9 Low debt Liquidity deficit Number: 1.704 Share: 15,3 % Production: 8,3 % Total debt: 23,6 mia. Bank debt: 3,0 mia. Share effective: 37,3 % Age: 54,5 High debt Liquidity surplus Number: 2.884 Share: 25,9 % Production: 39,2 % Total debt: 105,8 mia. Bank debt: 22,8 mia. Share effective: 74,9 % Age: 45,1 Low debt Liquidity surplus Number: 4.954 Share: 44,5 % Production: 36,4 % Total debt: 80,2 mia. Bank debt: 7,6 mia. Share effective: 75,8 % Age: 51,6 High debt (4.484 / 40,3 %) Low debt (6.658 / 59,7 %) Liquidity deficit (3.304 / 29,7 %) Liquidity surplus (7.838 / 70,3 %)

ECONOMIC STRENGTH OF THE MILK PRODUCERS Debt 70 % High debt Liquidity deficit Number: 587 Share: 17,6 % Production: 19,2 % Total debt: 18,8 mia. Bank debt: 5,8 mia. Share effective: 33,9 % Age: 46,7 Low debt Liquidity deficit Number: 246 Share: 7,4 % Production: 3,9 % Total debt: 2,3 mia. Bank debt: 0,3 mia. Share effective: 45,6 % Age: 54,4 Liquidity deficit High debt Liquidity surplus Number: 1.297 Share: 38,9 % Production: 51,4 % Total debt: 44,7 mia. Bank debt: 9,3 mia. Share effective: 81,5 % Age: 45,7 Low debt Liquidity surplus Number: 1.200 Share: 36,0 % Production: 25,6 % Total debt: 16,0 mia. Bank debt: 7,6 mia. Share effective: 1,3 % Age: 51,6 Liquidity surplus

ECONOMIC STRENGTH OF THE PIG PRODUCERS Debt 70 % High debt Liquidity deficit Number: 546 Share: 20,3 % Production: 20,2 % Total debt: 23,3 mia. Bank debt: 7,5 mia. Share effective: 26,0 % Age: 46,9 Low debt Liquidity deficit Number: 212 Share: 7,9 % Production: 4,3 % Total debt: 4,2 mia. Bank debt: 0,5 mia. Share effective: 26,0 % Age: 52,7 Liquidity deficit High debt Liquidity surplus Number: 943 Share: 34,9 % Production: 46,6 % Total debt: 43,2 mia. Bank debt: 9,2 mia. Share effective: 69,8 % Age: 45,4 Low debt Liquidity surplus Number: 997 Share: 37,0 % Production: 28,9 % Total debt: 22,8 mia. Bank debt: 1,8 mia. Share effective: 70,8 % Age: 50,3 Liquidity surplus

ALLOCATION OF THE RED FARMS IN DANISH REGIONS North Jutland (1.789) Full time farmers Pigs total Piglet s Slaugh ter pigs Milk Share, pct. 21,7 31,2 38,3 31,9 30,5 Production, pct. 23,6 30,4 38,8 31,0 33,2 Debt 15,0 6,8 3,6 2,6 4,0 Denmark (11.143) Full time farmers Pigs total Piglet s Slaugh ter pigs Milk Number farms 1.600 546 198 240 587 Share, pct. 14,4 20,3 20,8 20,6 17,6 Production, pct. 16,1 20,2 18,7 23,2 19,2 Debt 55,2 23,3 9,5 8,8 18,8 Vest Jutland (3.037) Full time farmers Pigs total Piglet s Slaugh ter pigs Milk Share, pct. 14,1 21,3 19,7 22,0 15,7 Production, pct. 16,1 22,3 17,5 30,4 16,9 Debt 14,8 6,0 2,4 2,6 6,1 East Jutland (1.898) Full time farmers Pigs total Piglet s Slaugh ter pigs Milk Share, pct. 13,0 16,4 12,5 19,2 13,3 Production, pct. 14,9 16,4 10,7 19,8 16,2 Debt 9,1 4,5 1,1 1,8 2,8 South Jutland and Fyn(2.397) Full time farmers Pigs total Piglet s Slaugh ter pigs Milk Share, pct. 13,2 17,3 15,8 16,5 16,9 Production, pct. 14,4 18,3 12,7 21,5 17,4 Debt 9,2 4,2 1,4 1,6, 3,3 Sealand and islands (1.657 Full time farmers Pigs total Piglet s Slaugh ter pigs Milk Share, pct. 10,0 13,7 17,1 14,6 15,9 Production, pct. 10,7 12,4 13,1 13,9 17,5 Debt 5,1 1,8 0,8 0,7 0,9

AGRICULTURAL SECTORS ACCESS TO BANK LOANS Soliditet Stong negative liquidity Weak negative liquidity Weak positive liquidity Stong positive liquidity Total 0 % 15 % 30 % 40 % Negative Proprietary Capital Slim PC. Vulnerable PC. Solid PC. Very solid PC. Antal: 893 Andel: 8,0 % Antal: 839 Andel: 7,5 % Antal: 818 Andel: 7,3 % Antal: 305 Andel: 2,7 % Antal: 338 Andel: 3,0 % Antal: 298 Andel: 2,7 % Antal: 374 Andel: 3,4 % Antal: 369 Andel: 3,3 % Antal: 128 Andel: 1,2 % Antal: 107 Andel: 1,0% Antal: 285 Andel: 2,6 % Antal: 484 Andel: 4,3 % Antal: 453 Andel: 4,1 % Antal: 204 Andel: 1,8 % Antal: 125 Andel: 1,1 % Antal: 401 Andel: 3,6 % Antal: 801 Andel: 7,2 % Antal: 1.167 Andel: 10,5 % Antal: 748 Andel: 6,7 % Antal: 2.005 Andel: 18,0 % Antal: 1.877 Andel: 16,9 % Antal: 2.498 Andel: 22,4 % Antal: 2.807 Andel: 25,2 % Antal: 1.384 Andel: 12,4 % Antal: 2.575 Andel: 23,1 % Total Antal: 3.192 Andel: 28,7 % Antal: 1.277 Andel: 11,5 % Antal: 1.551 Andel: 13,9 % Antal: 5.121 Andel: 46,0 % Antal: 11.141 Andel: 100 % -4 % 0 % 4 % Liquidity Revenue

AGRICULTURAL SECTORS ACCESS TO BANK LOANS Access to credit Number Share Red None 3.907 35,1 pct. Light Red Very limited 1.157 10,4 pct. Yellow Limited 1.828 16,4 pct. Light green Often good 1.496 13,4 pct. Green Good 2.752 24,7 pct. Access to credit Number Share Red None or very limited 5.065 45,5 pct. Yellow Limited 1.828 16,4 pct. Green Good or often good 4.249 38,1 pct.

AGRICULTURAL SECTORS ACCESS TO BANK LOANS IN PRACTICE

BENCHMARKING: QUANTILE ANALYSIS 40... 15. december 2015