Energy Bar Association

Similar documents
Southwestern Public Service Company Attachment O SPS Transmission Formula 2017 Projection Material Accounting Changes since January 1, 2016

April 28, Southwest Power Pool, Inc., Docket No. ER11- Submission of Formula Rate Template

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BERFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

July 15, 2015 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING

Midwest Energy, Inc. Transmission Formula Rate Protocols

Southwestern Public Service Company Attachment O SPS Transmission Formula Annual True-up for 2016 Material Accounting Changes since January 1, 2016

2018 Annual Projected Rate Meeting for South Central MCN LLC. October 18, :00pm 4:00pm CST

FERC Order on Base ROE Complaint against New England Transmission Owners

October 8, The Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C.

Stakeholder Meeting for GridLiance High Plains LLC 2019 Transmission Formula Rate Projection. October 31, :30 am CST

Stakeholder Meeting for GridLiance West LLC 2019 Annual Formula Rate Projection. November 7, :00pm CST

RR16 - Page 1 of

PROTOCOLS AS INCORPORATED INTO WESTAR S OATT

APPENDIX X FORMULA FOR CALCULATING THE ALLOCATED COSTS TO THE CITIZENS BORDER EAST LINE RATE UNDER SDG&E S TRANSMISSION OWNER TARIFF

November 29, RE: Southern California Edison Company s Formula Transmission Rate Annual Update Filing in Docket No. ER (TO2019)

Providing Focused Attention and Unparalleled Value To Every Client

APPENDIX IX ATTACHMENT 1 FORMULA RATE PROTOCOLS

Calculate Net Annual Transmission Revenue Requirements (ATRR) and Rates for SPP Tariff. Total Transmission A. Zonal Net ATRR 1 Gross ATRR $60,516,589

American Electric Power Service Corporation Docket No. ER10- -

July 21, Southwest Power Pool, Inc., Docket No. ER Submission of Response to Request for Additional Information

January 22, Compliance Filing of Virginia Electric and Power Company Docket No. EL

151 FERC 61,045 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Regulatory Status Report

May 8, Response to Show Cause Order, Filing of Revised Tariff Sheet And Request for Any Necessary Waivers. The Dayton Power and Light Company

June 13, Informational Filing Public Service Electric and Gas Company, Annual True-Up Adjustment Docket No. ER

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C FORM 10-Q

April 29, 2016 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING

COMMENTS OF TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP ON THE EUROPEAN REGULATORS GROUP FOR ELECTRICITY AND GAS DRAFT PROPOSAL ON GUIDELINES ON INTER-TSO COMPENSATION

153 FERC 61,249 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ORDER REJECTING TARIFF REVISIONS. (Issued November 30, 2015)

Entergy Services, Inc., Docket No. ER Informational Filing of Annual Transmission Formula Rate Update

Office Fax pepco.com

TRANSMISSION OWNER ZONAL PLACEMENT PROCESS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. ) ) ) ISO New England Inc. ) Docket No. ER ) ) ) )

ALSTON&BIRD LLP The Atlantic Building 950 F Street, NW Washington, DC

ALSTON&BIRD LLP The Atlantic Building 950 F Street, NW Washington, DC

2017 Actual Cost Attachment O, GG and MM Rate Template Presentation

Calculate Net Annual Transmission Revenue Requirements (ATRR) and Rates for SPP Tariff. Total Transmission A. Zonal Net ATRR 1 Gross ATRR $48,861,618

ALSTON&BIRD LLP The Atlantic Building 950 F Street, NW Washington, DC

Statement of Chairman Cheryl A. LaFleur on Forward Capacity Auction 8 Results Proceeding

N. Am. Elec. Reliability Corp., 119 FERC 61,060, order on reh g, 120 FERC 61,260 (2007).

158 FERC 61,044 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

WSPP Legal Update Operating Committee Meeting Lake Tahoe

Potomac Electric Power Company ( Pepco ), Docket No. ER Informational Filing of 2017 Formula Rate Annual Update; Notice of Annual Meeting

161 FERC 61,163 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

139 FERC 61,003 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Formula Rate - Non-Levelized Rate Formula Template For the 12 months ended 12/31/2016 Utilizing FERC Form 1 Data

American Electric Power Service Corporation ER Etariff Compliance Filing

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

150 FERC 61,116 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

SUBMITTED VIA E-TARIFF FILING. July 2, Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426

Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.

Formula Rate - Non-Levelized Rate Formula Template For the 12 months ended 12/31/2019 Utilizing FERC Form 1 Data

ALSTON&BIRD LLP The Atlantic Building 950 F Street, NW Washington, DC

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C FORM 10-Q

Rate Formula Template (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

153 FERC 61,248 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

FERC ELECTRICITY 101 COURSE. January 30, 2017 Hyatt Regency Mission Bay Spa & Marina San Diego, CA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Pacific Gas and Electric Company ) Docket No.


January 17, via etariff

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY ) DOCKET NO.

Office Fax delmarva.com

May 15, Duke Energy Ohio, Inc., and Duke Energy Kentucky, Inc. Formula Rate Annual Update Docket No. ER

August 16, Attachment 1 to the Formula Rate is the Formula Protocols, and Attachment 2 is the Formula Spreadsheet. 2

In addition to this transmittal letter and associated records for the etariff database, this filing includes:

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) 1 GROSS REVENUE REQUIREMENT (page 3, line 47) $

October 29, The Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C.

161 FERC 61,004 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

FERC Issued Order No. 773-A on Rehearing and Clarification of NERC Bulk Electric System Definition and Exceptions Process under Rules of Procedure

Formula Rate - Non-Levelized Rate Formula Template For the 12 months ended 12/31/17 Utilizing FERC Form 1 Data

Transactional Scoping and Approvals

October 11, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C Attention: Ms. Kimberly D.

post such Annual Update on PJM s Internet website via link to the Transmission Services page or a similar successor page; and

RE: Revision to Southern California Edison Company s Formula Transmission Rate Annual Update in Docket No. ER (Amended TO8)

June 20, Ms. Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C

DEVELOPMENTS IN FERC POLICY FOR DETERMINING RETURN ON EQUITY

Rate Case Process and Rate-Based Ratemaking

FERC s U-Turn on Transmission Rate Incentives

December 29, American Electric Power Service Corporation Docket No. ER

156 FERC 61,118 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ORDER ON PETITION FOR DECLARATORY ORDER. (Issued August 19, 2016)

161 FERC 61,010 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

March 19, MidAmerican Central California Transco, LLC Docket No. ER

RE: Southern California Edison Company s Formula Transmission Rate Annual Update Filing in Docket No. ER (TO11)

The Same Numbers, Constantly in a State of Flux Transmission Return on Equity

Regulatory Status Report

Formula Rate - Appendix A Estimate Notes FERC Form 1 Page # or Instruction 2015 Shaded cells are input cells Allocators

Regulatory Status Report

July 30, Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, DC Dear Ms.

May 11, Re: PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Docket No. ER Informational Filing of 2012 Formula Rate Annual Update

Southwestern Public Service Company ( SPS ) Transmission Formula Rate 2015 Projection

SPP Staff Proposal on TO Zonal Placement. April 20, 2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. San Diego Gas & Electric Company ) Docket No.

How To Assure Returns For New Transmission Investment

New Member Cost Allocation Review Process. Prepared by: COST ALLOCATION WORKING GROUP

FERC AUDITS. Power Regulatory Webinar Series. October 26, 2016

1 GROSS REVENUE REQUIREMENT (page 3, line 31, column 5) $ 121,165,696

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. ) ISO New England Inc. ) Docket No. ER )

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Transcription:

Energy Bar Association EBA Energizer: Section 205/206 Fundamentals and Insights November 17, 2016 David DesLauriers, Director Black & Veatch Management Consulting, LLC Jason T. Gray Esq., Shareholder Duncan, Weinberg, Genzer & Pembroke, PC

Agenda Section 1: Introduction to FPA Section 205/206 Filings Section 2: The Importance of a Properly Prepared and Documented Filing Section 3: What to Expect Procedurally 2

Section 1 Introduction to FPA Section 205/206 Filings 3

Rate Regulation Under the Federal Power Act FERC regulates the (1) rates, terms, and conditions (2) by which public utilities (3) transmit electric energy in interstate commerce or(4) make wholesale sales of electric energy in interstate commerce. 16 U.S.C. 824(b). Structure of the Federal Power Act: FPA Section 205, 16 U.S.C. 824d; and FPA Section 206, 16 U.S.C. 824e. 4

FPA Section 205 First Five Sub Parts: (a) rates must be just and reasonable; (b) rates must not be unduly discriminatory; (c) rates must be on file; (d) changes can only be made via timely filings that are properly noticed; and (e) effective date may be suspended for up to five months. 5

Section 205 Proceedings Initial filings submitted by public utilities Assigned an ER docket number. Can be submitted on behalf of non FERC jurisdictional entities. Stated rate v. formula rate. Are such filings required? What is the appropriate scope of such a filing? Burden of proof/persuasion Next steps Interventions, comments, and protests are generally due within 21 days of filing. FERC action required within 60 days of filing. Preview of Section 3 (slides 21 24). 6

FPA Section 206 First Two Sub Parts: (a) Existing rate cannot be illegal and rate to be thereafter observed must be legal; and (b) requires FERC to establish a refund effective date. 7

Section 206 Proceedings Complaints are submitted by [a]ny person (e.g., wholesale customers, state public utility commissions, other public utilities, etc.) Assigned an EL docket number. Requires a two part showing. Or does it? Must comply with procedural requirements in Rule 206. What is the appropriate scope of a complaint? What about non jurisdictional entities? FERC may initiate Section 206 investigations 8

Section 206 Proceedings, cont. Burden of proof/persuasion Next steps Answers by respondent, interventions, and comments are generally due within 20 days of filing. Answers must comply with requirements in Rule 213. No specified time period for FERC action. Preview to Section 3 (slides 21 24). 9

Section 2 The Importance of a Properly Prepared and Documented Filing 10

Basic Components of a 205 Filing Revenue Requirement & Cost of Service Study Cost of Capital Load Flow Studies and Technical Studies Rate Design (Stated or Formula Rate) Testimony in Narrative Form to Explain these Technical Elements 11

Revenue Requirement Formula Revenue Requirement Recovers Operating & Maintenance Expenses (including Litigation Expense) Depreciation Taxes Rate of Return (equity and debt service) on Rate Base Rate Base Regulatory concept that represents the used and useful set of assets upon which the utility is able to recover a return Typically based on net plant plus allowances for working capital, general plant, and other items; ADIT and customer contributions principal offsets. Case Stated on a Test Year Basis 12

Cost of Service Study A study that identifies the appropriate costs of providing transmission service for the purposes of developing a revenue requirement. Objective is to state the cost of the transmission system for the purpose of rate recovery Note: transmission assets may be part of a stand alone transmission only system; or Part of an integrated distribution and transmission system. Established standards and approaches for stating transmission assets exist. FERC 7 Factor Test Tariff Specific (Attachment AI SPP OATT example) Other 13

Uniform System of Accounts Principal Accounts Used in Transmission COS Transmission Plant Accounts (Acct. 350 359) Acct 353 Station Equipment Acct 354 Towers & Fixtures Acct 355 Poles and Fixtures Accumulated Depreciation Acct 108 Accumulated Depreciation Note: Ledger must separate transmission from other assets Transmission O&M Accounts (Acct. 560 590) Acct. 560 566 Maintenance 569 573 Depreciation Expense Account 403 14

Cost of Capital The allowed rate of return on invested capital A hypothetical figure that often attracts a high degree of debate Many factors considered including: Size of company and risk Two Step Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis Other factors Recent FERC Opinion 531 1 established a tighter dead band around which awards could be considered. Opinion used two step DCF and established zone of reasonableness between 7.03% and 11.74%; other factors can affect appropriate level within zone 1 Martha Coakley, Massachusetts Attorney General v. Bangor Hydro Electric Co., Opinion No. 531, 147 FERC 61,234 (2014), order on paper hearing, Opinion No. 531 A, 149 FERC 61,032 (2014), reh g denied, Opinion No. 531 B, 150 FERC 61,165 (2015), appeal docketed, Emera Maine v. FERC, No. 15 1118 (D.C. Cir. April 30, 2015). 15

Rate Design Two options for Rate Design: Fixed (Stated) Rate and Formula Rate Fixed Rate rate is set for a specific term and does not change during that time Formula Rate rate is set to recover costs using a specific formula to collect revenue requirement components Each rate has specific trade offs that must be evaluated as part of filing planning. 16

Special Studies and Additional Support It is often helpful to provide additional studies and areas of support to make sufficient demonstration of cost causative link to transmission or to support other regulatory showings: Load flow studies: To identify how system is used; to prevent double recovery of revenue requirement Capitalized overhead studies: To support the level of operating and general expense supporting capital projects that should be reclassified as asset related Other studies specific to the filing circumstance 17

Areas of Debate What is a transmission asset by regulatory standards? Non radial, interconnected to larger bulk system, generator stepup units excluded, etc. How much A&G and General Plant goes to support transmission function? Other functions? What is the appropriate level of Return on Equity for the transmission utility? Are the assets used by the utility for native load or other sales? Other issues 18

Common Evidentiary Pitfalls Rationale lacking for establishing that assets and expenses support transmission service Clear cost causal link between allocation of costs between transmission and other functions does not exist Lack of well documented cost of service study Insufficient support for cost of capital request Filing does not meet basic content requirements established by FERC 19

Basic Components of a 206 Filing Similar to 205 Filing (depending on area challenged) Difficulty in Obtaining Information Sufficient to Meet Burden? 20

Section 3 What to Expect Procedurally 21

Illustrative Section 205 Settlement Timeline 8) Participate in settlement 2) Decide upon rate action 4) Begin cost of capital analysis 6) Submit filing to FERC YEAR 1 YEAR 2 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 1) Evaluate need for transmission rate action 3) Begin cost of service study and revenue requirements analysis 5) Initiate any special studies 7) FERC sets for settlement; parties have five days to agree on settlement judge 9) FERC approves settlement or sets for hearing 22 22

Hearing Tracks for Litigated Cases Simple, Track I: Initial Decision Within 29.5 Weeks of Order Designating Presiding Judge Complex, Track II: Initial Decision Within 47 Weeks of Order Designating Presiding Judge Exceptionally Complex, Track III: Initial Decision Within 63 Weeks of Order Designating Presiding Judge 23

From Initial Decision to Final Action by FERC Briefs on Exceptions to the Initial Decision are Due within 30 days of Issuance Rule 711(a)(1) Briefs Opposing Exceptions are Due within 20 Days of Filing Briefs on Exceptions Rule 711(a)(ii) FERC Opinions Generally Issued within 12 to 18 Months of Issuance of Initial Decision FERC Order on Rehearing may be Issued within another 12 24 Months This is the order that is subject to judicial review 24

Other Considerations in Section 206 Proceedings Expect Pancaked Complaints? Consolidation of Pancaked Complaints? 25

Appendix 26

Sampling of 205/206 Proceedings Type Filer Docket Reference Description 205 Filings Public Utility Stated Rate Public Utility Formula Rate Template with No Cost of Service Elements Non FERC Jurisdictional Stated Rate (Municipality) Non FERC Jurisdictional Stated Rate (Rural Electric Cooperative) 206 Filings Complaints Against MISO Transmission Owners (return on equity) Kansas Corporation Commission v. Westar Energy Inc. FERC Investigation viz. Southwest Power Pool Pacific Gas & Electric Company NextEra Energy Transmission Southwest, LLC The Central Nebraska Public Power & Irrigation District Lea County Electric Cooperative Association of Businesses Advocating Tariff Equity Kansas Corporation Commission Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ER16 2320 ER16 2720 ER15 279 ER14 1225 EL14 12 and EL15 45 EL14 93 EL16 91 Application to increase existing transmission revenue requirement Petition to implement a formula rate structure Revisions to RTO OATT to implement a stated rate for a non jurisdictional municipal entity Revisions to RTO OATT to implement a stated rate for a non jurisdictional electric cooperative ROE complaints against MISO Transmission Owners ROE complaints brought by Kansas Corporation Commission against Westar Energy Inc. Reasonableness of SPP tariff with regards to non jurisdictional utilities revenue requirements 27

7 Factor Test In Order 888, the FERC set out a seven factor test to distinguish distribution facilities from transmission facilities when establishing whether the delivery component of an unbundled retail power sale was transmission or distribution: local distribution facilities are normally in close proximity to retail customers local distribution facilities are primarily radial in character power flows into local distribution systems, and rarely, if ever flows out when power enters a local distribution system, it is not reconsigned or transported on to some other market power entering a local distribution system is consumed in a comparatively restricted geographic area meters are based at the transmission/local distribution interface to measure flow into the local distribution system local distribution systems will be of reduced voltage 28

SPP Criteria for Inclusion of Facilities Non radial power lines, substations, and associated facilities operating at 60 kv as well as radial lines (including open loops) and associated facilities operating at 60 kv that serve two or more customers Facilities connecting internal zones to each other and that connect SPP with surrounding entities Equipment necessary to control & protect Transmission Facilities For substations connected to transmission lines where power is transformed from 60 kv to <60 kv, facilities on the high voltage side are included The Portion of DC interconnections with areas outside of SPP that are owned by a Transmission Owner within SPP (including <60 kv) Facilities operated <60 kv that have been determined to be transmission via the 7 factor test in FERC Order 888 Excludes: Generator step up transformers & generator leads, radial lines from a generating station to a substation or a transmission switching station, and Direct Assignment Facilities 29 Attachment AI, Southwest Power Pool Open Access Transmission Tariff

Summary Cost of Service Study A B C D E Line No Description FERC Account Reference Transmission Total RATE BASE Gross Plant 1 Relaying Equipment & Battery 334 Worksheet B $250,000 2 Transmission (Substations primarily) 350, 352, and 353 Worksheet B & C 2,200,000 3 Transmission Plant Towers & Fixtures 354 Worksheet B 4,000,000 4 General Plant 389 398 Worksheet B 60,000 5 Intangible Plant (FERC License) 303 Worksheet B 90,000 6 Construction Work Orders (CWO) Worksheet D 410,000 7 Subtotal Gross Plant $7,010,000 Accumulated Depreciation 8 Relaying Equipment & Battery 108 Worksheet B $(25,000) 9 Transmission (Substations & Towers) 108 Worksheet B & C (1,000,000) 10 General Plant 108 Worksheet B (55,000) 11 Intangible Plant 108 Worksheet B (50,000) 12 Subtotal Accumulated Depreciation $(1,130,000) 13 Net Plant $5,880,000 14 Working Capital Worksheet B 20,000 15 Materials 154 Worksheet M 35,000 16 Total Rate Base $5,935,000 EXPENSES 17 O&M 561, 562, 569,570 Worksheet E $400,000 18 Office Related Expenses 535 Worksheet E 1,000 19 OPEB & Pension Obligations Worksheet E 4,000 20 A&G 909 932 Worksheet E 8,000 21 Control Center 537 Worksheet E 35,000 22 FERC License Expense 537, 545 Worksheet E 5,000 23 FERC License Fees 928 Worksheet E 1,000 24 Subtotal Operating Expenses $454,000 DEPRECIATION 25 Relaying Equipment & Battery 403 Worksheet H $6,000 26 Transmission (Substations & Towers) 403 Worksheet H 50,000 27 General Plant 403 Worksheet H 2,000 28 Intangible Plant 403 Worksheet H 3,000 29 Subtotal Depreciation $61,000 RETURN AND OTHER EXPENSES 30 Return on Rate Base Worksheet J 534,150 31 Litigation Expense Worksheet I 120,000 32 Participation Fees Worksheet L 7,000 33 TOTAL REVENUE REQUIREMENT BEFORE CREDIT $1,176,150 34 Revenue Credit Worksheet K 176,775 35 36 Annual Transmission Revenue Requirement (ATRR) $1,352,925 30

Resources FPA Section 205, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/16/824d FPA Section 206, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/16/824e 18 C.F.R. 385.206, https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/18/385.206 18 C.F.R. 385.213, https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/18/385.213 18 C.F.R. 385.711, https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/18/385.711 31

Resources, cont. Available Settlement Judges, http://www.ferc.gov/legal/adr/avail judge.asp FERC Hearing Tracks, http://www.ferc.gov/legal/admin lit/time sum.asp FERC Discovery Timelines, https://www.ferc.gov/legal/admin lit/time dis.asp 32

Contact Information David DesLauriers Director, Black & Veatch Management Consulting, LLC 200 Wheeler Rd Burlington, MA 01803 (781) 565 5819 DesLauriersDF@bv.com Jason T. Gray, Esq. Shareholder Duncan, Weinberg, Genzer, & Pembroke, P.C. 1615 M Street, NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036 (202) 791 3721 JTG@dwgp.com 33