Vol. 5 (November 9, 2016), /10/$3.00

Similar documents
CHAPTER 6 DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

Univariate and Multivariate Analysis of Categorical Attributes with Many Response Categories

Jamie Wagner Ph.D. Student University of Nebraska Lincoln

CHAPTER 4 DATA ANALYSIS Data Hypothesis

Applied Behavior Analysis Technician (ABAT ) Pass Point Study Data Analysis Report

XLSTAT TIP SHEET FOR BUSINESS STATISTICS CENGAGE LEARNING

Financial Advice Satisfaction Index April 2017

Strategies for Assessing Health Plan Performance on Chronic Diseases: Selecting Performance Indicators and Applying Health-Based Risk Adjustment

Better decision making under uncertain conditions using Monte Carlo Simulation

101: MICRO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

~ Credit Card Survey of USC Students ~ Results from Spring 2002

proc genmod; model malform/total = alcohol / dist=bin link=identity obstats; title 'Table 2.7'; title2 'Identity Link';

Quantitative Measure. February Axioma Research Team

CHAPTER-VI PERCEPTIONAL ANALYSIS OF CHIT MEMBERS AND THE MANAGERIAL STAFF

Lecture 21: Logit Models for Multinomial Responses Continued

Full file at Chapter 2 Descriptive Statistics: Tabular and Graphical Presentations

Multivariate Analysis of Student Loan Defaulters at Prairie View A&M University

SUMMARY OF MARYLAND STATE EMPLOYEES & RETIREES MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE PLAN

Relationship Between Household Nonresponse, Demographics, and Unemployment Rate in the Current Population Survey.

PATIENT INFORMATION Patient Name: Last First Middle Initial. Address. Street or P.O. Box City, State Zip

KENTUCKY BOARD of EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES

CHAPTER V. PRESENTATION OF RESULTS

PERCEIVED FINANCIAL LITERACY AND SAVINGS BEHAVIOR OF IT PROFESSIONALS IN KERALA

Calculating the Probabilities of Member Engagement

FIGURE A1.1. Differences for First Mover Cutoffs (Round one to two) as a Function of Beliefs on Others Cutoffs. Second Mover Round 1 Cutoff.

Millennial Money Mindset Report

Using Presumptive Analytics for Your Financial Assistance Policy:

Impact of Transfer Income on Cognitive Impairment in the Elderly

Summary of Statistical Analysis Tools EDAD 5630

Stat 101 Exam 1 - Embers Important Formulas and Concepts 1

Your Retirement Lifestyle Plan

Accolade: The Effect of Personalized Advocacy on Claims Cost

Practical Aspects of Mortality Improvement Modeling

Survey Sampling, Fall, 2006, Columbia University Homework assignments (2 Sept 2006)

SEX DISCRIMINATION PROBLEM

DOG BITES MAN: AMERICANS ARE SHORTSIGHTED ABOUT THEIR FINANCES

Session 57PD, Predicting High Claimants. Presenters: Zoe Gibbs Brian M. Hartman, ASA. SOA Antitrust Disclaimer SOA Presentation Disclaimer

The Relationship between Psychological Distress and Psychological Wellbeing

Risk Tolerance Profile of Cash-Value Life Insurance Owners

Statistical Models of Stocks and Bonds. Zachary D Easterling: Department of Economics. The University of Akron

Business Statistics, Cdn. Ed., 3e (Sharpe) Chapter 2: Data. Short Answer - Quiz A

Using Predictive Analytics to Better Understand Morbidity

2.1 Introduction Computer-assisted personal interview response rates Reasons for attrition at Wave

Iowa State University Financial Counseling Clinic Client Report

February 3, Experience Study Judges Retirement Fund

Community Survey Results

Economics 318 Health Economics. Midterm Examination II March 21, 2013 ANSWER KEY

MILITARY FRIENDLY COMPANIES AWARDS

Arkansas Experience with Health Savings Accounts in a Medicaid Expansion Population

The Determinants of Bank Mergers: A Revealed Preference Analysis

Labor Participation and Gender Inequality in Indonesia. Preliminary Draft DO NOT QUOTE

The analysis of credit scoring models Case Study Transilvania Bank

November 3, Transmitted via to Dear Commissioner Murphy,

SUMMARY OF BENEFITS $500 ** Effective from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 Insured by Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company

EFFECT OF FINANCIAL LITERACY ON STOCK MARKET PARTICIPATION BY SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES IN RWANDA: A CASE KIMIRONKO MARKET

Emergency department visits for the treatment of work-related injury and illness in Ontario

Psychological Factors of Voluntary Retirement Saving

Internet Appendix. The survey data relies on a sample of Italian clients of a large Italian bank. The survey,

Internet use and attitudes Metrics Bulletin

214 Massachusetts Ave. N.E Washington D.C (202) TESTIMONY. Medicaid Expansion

SPSS t tests (and NP Equivalent)

RESULTS OF THE 2012 STATE FAIR SURVEY OF RETIREMENT AND LONG-TERM CARE

2017 Vitality Engagement Study

FOR ONLINE PUBLICATION ONLY. Supplemental Appendix for:

Data Appendix. A.1. The 2007 survey

Palm Beach County Augmentation to the 2004 Florida Health Insurance Study

One Proportion Superiority by a Margin Tests

Provocation and the Strategy of Terrorist and Guerilla Attacks: Online Theory Appendix

To be two or not be two, that is a LOGISTIC question

Selection of High-Deductible Health Plans: Attributes Influencing Likelihood and Implications for Consumer-Driven Approaches

Discrete Probability Distributions

SUMMARY OF MARYLAND STATE EMPLOYEES & RETIREES BEHAVIORAL HEALTH PLAN

DR. MATOVU MUSA (PhD) Director, Kampala Campus

CHAPTER 2 Describing Data: Numerical

SALARY EQUITY ANALYSIS AT ARL INSTITUTIONS

CFA Level II - LOS Changes

CFA Level II - LOS Changes

Name: 1. Use the data from the following table to answer the questions that follow: (10 points)

Arkansas Works (formerly Health Care Independence Program Private Option )

Patrick A. Quigley, Ph.D., LSAC

COMMUNITY ADVANTAGE PANEL SURVEY: DATA COLLECTION UPDATE AND ANALYSIS OF PANEL ATTRITION

Estimating the Cost and Utilization of Wrap-Around Coverage for Employed and Potentially Employed People with Disabilities

Quantile regression with PROC QUANTREG Peter L. Flom, Peter Flom Consulting, New York, NY

Kim Manturuk American Sociological Association Social Psychological Approaches to the Study of Mental Health

Capital allocation in Indian business groups

Comparability in Meaning Cross-Cultural Comparisons Andrey Pavlov

Profile of Ohio s Medicaid-Enrolled Adults and Those who are Potentially Eligible

Tables and Charts. Numbers Title of Tables Page Number

2007 Minnesota Department of Revenue Taxpayer Satisfaction with the Filing Process

Policy Research Perspectives

Supporting Information: Preferences for International Redistribution: The Divide over the Eurozone Bailouts

Session 5: Associations

UPDATED IAA EDUCATION SYLLABUS

Financial Literacy and Financial Inclusion: A Case Study of Punjab

Business Strategies in Credit Rating and the Control of Misclassification Costs in Neural Network Predictions

Equivalence Tests for Two Correlated Proportions

Predicting Student Loan Delinquency and Default. Presentation at Canadian Economics Association Annual Conference, Montreal June 1, 2013

Stockport (Local Authority)

Common Rental Application for Housing in Vermont

HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE IN MAINE

Transcription:

Comparing MMPI-2 F-K Index Normative Data among Male and Female Psychiatric and Head-Injured Patients, Individuals Seeking Disability Benefits, Police and Priest Job Applicants, and Substance Abusers Paul R. Yarnold, Ph.D. Optimal Data Analysis, LLC Used as a validity indicator with the MMPI-2, the F-K Index helps to identify people who may over- or under-report psychological issues. Prior research obtained normative data on this index for males and females sampled in a variety of settings, and eyeball examination 1 of resulting score distributions suggested: The F-K score distributions appear to differ across the different samples of diagnostic and job applicant samples, as the clinical profiles of these groups would be expected to differ from one another. Thus, no single set of cutoff scores should be used to judge the motivation or validity of clinical profiles of subjects from different clinical or normative populations (p. 9). Exploratory novometric analysis 2-20 is used to predict F-K score as a function of gender and setting in order to establish the existence and assess the strength of the hypothesized inter-sample differences in F-K score distributions. Data analyzed herein 1 are indicated in SAS code used to construct the data set for analysis by ODA (Appendix). Treating F-K score as an ordered class variable, and setting and gender as categorical attributes, novometric analysis found five structurally parallel one-attribute, two-strata models with strong normed predictive accuracy. These models had stable accuracy in leave-oneout jackknife analysis, and used the identical classification rule: if sample=psychiatric inpatients or disability benefit applicants, then predict F-K score<(optimal threshold identified by ODA); otherwise if sample=hathaway and Briggs, MMPI-2 standardization, substance dependent, traumatic brain injury, police academy applicant, or priest position applicant) then 186

predict F-K score>(optimal threshold). The value of the optimal threshold, and the corresponding model ESS, sensitivity (for psychiatric inpatients and disability applicants vs. for the other samples), and D statistic 2,21 for each model are given in Table 1. Table 1: Five Homogeneous Optimal Models Model Optimal F-K Score Threshold Psychiatric, Disability Subjects Other Subjects ESS D 1 < 10 92.36 88.18 80.54 0.483 2 < 15 96.11 86.26 82.37 0.428 3 < 18 97.01 85.39 82.41 0.427 4 < 19 97.60 85.24 82.84 0.414 5 < 17 97.30 85.68 82.97 0.411 Model 5 has the lowest D statistic and is thus the globally-optimal (GO) model here. 2,21 However, the models in Table 1 all have very homogeneous performance, and corresponding summary statistics all have overlapping exact discrete 95% confidence intervals. 3,23 In contrast to the conclusions reached on the basis of visual examination of the data, novometric statistical analysis revealed that: (a) neither gender or F-K score discriminates psychiatric inpatients from disability insurance applicants; (b) neither gender or F-K score discriminates subjects in the Hathaway and Briggs, MMPI-2 standardization, substance dependent, traumatic brain injury, police academy applicant, or priest position applicant samples; however (c) five different F-K thresholds strongly and reproducibly discriminate psychiatric inpatients and disability insurance applicants vs. subjects from other samples. References 1 Rothke SE, Friedman AF, Dahlstrom WG, Greene RL, Arredondo R, Mann AW (1994). MMPI-2 normative data for the F-K index: Implications for clinical, neuropsychological, and forensic practice. Assessment, 1, 1-15. 2 Yarnold PR, Soltysik RC (2016). Maximizing predictive accuracy. Chicago, IL: ODA Books. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1368.3286 3 Yarnold PR, Linden A (2016). Novometric analysis with ordered class variables: The optimal alternative to linear regression analysis, Optimal Data Analysis, 5, 65-73. 4 Yarnold PR, Bennett CL (2016). Novometrics vs. correlation: Age and clinical measures of PCP survivors, Optimal Data Analysis, 5, 74-78. 5 Yarnold PR, Bennett CL (2016). Novometrics vs. multiple regression analysis: Age and clinical measures of PCP survivors, Optimal Data Analysis, 5, 79-82. 6 Yarnold PR (2016). Novometrics vs. regression analysis: Literacy, and age and income, of ambulatory geriatric patients. Optimal Data Analysis, 5, 83-85. 7 Yarnold PR (2016). Novometrics vs. regression analysis: Modeling patient satisfaction in the Emergency Room. Optimal Data Analysis, 5, 86-93. 8 Yarnold PR (2016). Matrix display of pairwise novometric associations for ordered variables. Optimal Data Analysis, 5, 94-101. 9 Yarnold PR, Batra M (2016). Matrix display of pairwise novometric associations for mixedmetric variables. Optimal Data Analysis, 5, 104-107. 10 Yarnold PR (2016). Novometrics vs. ODA vs. One-Way ANOVA: Evaluating comparative effectiveness of sales training programs, and the importance of conducting LOO with small samples. Optimal Data Analysis, 5, 131-132. 11 Yarnold PR (2016). Parental smoking behavior, ethnicity, gender, and the cigarette 187

smoking behavior of high school students. Optimal Data Analysis, 5, 136-140. 12 Yarnold PR (2016). Using gender of an imaginary rated smoker, and subject s gender, ethnicity, and smoking behavior to identify perceived differences in peer-group smoking standards of American high school students. Optimal Data Analysis, 5, 141-143. 13 Yarnold PR (2016). Novometric models of smoking habits of male and female friends of American college undergraduates: Gender, smoking, and ethnicity. Optimal Data Analysis, 5, 146-150. 14 Yarnold PR (2016). Predicting daily television viewing of senior citizens using education, age and marital status. Optimal Data Analysis, 5, 151-152. 15 Yarnold PR (2016). Novometric statistical analysis and the Pearson-Yule debate. Optimal Data Analysis, 5, 162-165. 16 Yarnold PR (2016). Comparing WAIS-R qualitative information for people 75 years and older, with vs. without brain damage. Optimal Data Analysis, 5, 166-170. 17 Yarnold PR (2016). Using novometrics to disentangle complete sets of sign-test-based multiple-comparison findings. Optimal Data Analysis, 5, 175-176. 18 Yarnold PR (2016). Novometric analysis vs. MANOVA: MMPI codetype, gender, setting, and the MacAndrew Alcoholism scale. Optimal Data Analysis, 5, 177-178. 19 Yarnold PR (2016). Novometric vs. ODA reliability analysis vs. polychoric correlation with relaxed distributional assumptions: Interrater reliability of independent ratings of plant health. Optimal Data Analysis, 5, 179-183. 20 Yarnold PR (2016). Novometrics vs. polychoric correlation: Number of lambs born over two years. Optimal Data Analysis, 5, 184-185. 21 Yarnold PR, Linden A (2016). Theoretical aspects of the D statistic. Optimal Data Analysis, 5, 171-174. 22 Bryant FB, Harrison PR (2013). How to create an ASCII input data file for UniODA and CTA software. Optimal Data Analysis, 2, 2-6. 23 Yarnold PR, Soltysik RC (2014). Discrete 95% confidence intervals for ODA model- and chance-based classifications. Optimal Data Analysis, 3, 110-112. Author Notes This study analyzed publically available data. No conflict of interest was reported. Mail: Optimal Data Analysis, LLC 6348 N. Milwaukee Ave., #163 Chicago, IL 60646 USA 188

Appendix SAS Code used to Construct (Reproduce 1 ) the Data File for Analysis by ODA Software 2,22 Samples were dummy-coded as follows: Hathaway and Briggs sample=1; MMPI-2 standardization sample=2; psychiatric inpatients=3; substance dependent sample=4; traumatic brain injury sample=5; disability benefit applicants=6; police academy applicant sample=7; priest position applicant sample=8. data real; infile datalines; input group row column; cards; 1 1 1 ; Data example; put '1 1-25'; put '1 1-21'; put '1 1-20'; put '1 1-19'; put '1 1-18'; put '1 1-17'; put '1 1-16'; put '1 1-15'; put '1 1-14'; Do n=1 to 14; put '1 1-13'; put '1 1-12'; put '1 1-11'; Do n=1 to 12; put '1 1-10'; put '1 1-9'; put '1 1-8'; put '1 1-7'; put '1 1-6'; put '1 1-5'; put '1 1-4'; put '1 1-3'; put '1 1-2'; put '1 1-1'; put '1 1 0'; put '1 1 1'; put '1 1 2'; put '1 1 3'; put '1 1 4'; put '1 1 7'; put '1 1 8'; put '1 1 10'; put '1 1 15'; put '1 1 16'; put '1 1 17'; put '1 1 23'; put '1 0-23'; put '1 0-22'; put '1 0-21'; put '1 0-20'; put '1 0-19'; put '1 0-18'; put '1 0-17'; put '1 0-16'; put '1 0-15'; Do n=1 to 12; put '1 0-14'; Do n=1 to 18; put '1 0-13'; Do n=1 to 23; put '1 0-12'; Do n=1 to 28; put '1 0-11'; put '1 0-10'; Do n=1 to 23; put '1 0-9'; put '1 0-8'; Do n=1 to 20; put '1 0-7'; Do n=1 to 12; put '1 0-6'; Do n=1 to 25; put '1 0-5'; Do n=1 to 15; put '1 0-4'; put '1 0-3'; put '1 0-2'; put '1 0-1'; put '1 0 0'; put '1 0 1'; put '1 0 2'; put '1 0 3'; put '1 0 4'; put '1 0 5'; put '1 0 6'; put '1 0 8'; put '1 0 9'; put '1 0 13'; put '2 1-25'; put '2 1-24'; Do n=1 to 14; put '2 1-23'; Do n=1 to 15; put '2 1-22'; Do n=1 to 27; put '2 1-21'; Do n=1 to 43; put '2 1-20'; Do n=1 to 35; put '2 1-19'; Do n=1 to 49; put '2 1-18'; Do n=1 to 43; put '2 1-17'; Do n=1 to 53; put '2 1-16'; Do n=1 to 57; put '2 1-15'; Do n=1 to 70; put '2 1-14'; Do n=1 to 63; put '2 1-13'; Do n=1 to 72; put '2 1-12'; Do n=1 to 74; put '2 1-11'; Do n=1 to 63; put '2 1-10'; Do n=1 to 63; put '2 1-9'; Do n=1 to 70; put '2 1-8'; Do n=1 to 42; put '2 1-7'; Do n=1 to 51; put '2 1-6'; Do n=1 to 37; put '2 1-5'; Do n=1 to 38; put '2 1-4'; Do n=1 to 19; put '2 1-3'; Do n=1 to 19; 189

put '2 1-2'; Do n=1 to 30; put '2 1-1'; Do n=1 to 17; put '2 1 0'; Do n=1 to 16; put '2 1 1'; put '2 1 2'; Do n=1 to 14; put '2 1 3'; put '2 1 4'; put '2 1 5'; put '2 1 6'; put '2 1 7'; put '2 1 8'; put '2 1 9'; put '2 1 11'; put '2 1 15'; put '2 0-26'; put '2 0-25'; put '2 0-24'; put '2 0-23'; Do n=1 to 30; put '2 0-22'; Do n=1 to 24; put '2 0-21'; Do n=1 to 45; put '2 0-20'; Do n=1 to 53; put '2 0-19'; Do n=1 to 60; put '2 0-18'; Do n=1 to 80; put '2 0-17'; Do n=1 to 95; put '2 0-16'; Do n=1 to 102; put '2 0-15'; Do n=1 to 83; put '2 0-14'; Do n=1 to 98; put '2 0-13'; Do n=1 to 82; put '2 0-12'; Do n=1 to 83; put '2 0-11'; Do n=1 to 79; put '2 0-10'; Do n=1 to 75; put '2 0-9'; Do n=1 to 68; put '2 0-8'; Do n=1 to 66; put '2 0-7'; Do n=1 to 62; put '2 0-6'; Do n=1 to 49; put '2 0-5'; Do n=1 to 38; put '2 0-4'; Do n=1 to 37; put '2 0-3'; Do n=1 to 30; put '2 0-2'; Do n=1 to 23; put '2 0-1'; put '2 0 0'; Do n=1 to 12; put '2 0 1'; put '2 0 2'; put '2 0 3'; put '2 0 4'; put '2 0 5'; put '2 0 6'; put '2 0 7'; put '2 0 8'; put '2 0 9'; put '2 0 11'; put '2 0 12'; put '2 0 13'; put '3 1-22'; put '3 1-21'; put '3 1-19'; put '3 1-18'; put '3 1-17'; put '3 1-16'; put '3 1-15'; put '3 1-14'; put '3 1-13'; put '3 1-12'; put '3 1-11'; put '3 1-10'; put '3 1-9'; put '3 1-8'; put '3 1-7'; put '3 1-6'; put '3 1-5'; put '3 1-4'; put '3 1-3'; put '3 1-2'; put '3 1-1'; put '3 1 0'; put '3 1 1'; put '3 1 2'; put '3 1 3'; put '3 1 4'; put '3 1 5'; put '3 1 6'; put '3 1 7'; put '3 1 8'; put '3 1 9'; put '3 1 10'; put '3 1 11'; put '3 1 12'; put '3 1 13'; put '3 1 14'; put '3 1 15'; put '3 1 16'; put '3 1 17'; put '3 1 18'; put '3 1 19'; put '3 1 20'; put '3 1 21'; put '3 1 22'; put '3 1 23'; put '3 1 24'; put '3 1 25'; put '3 1 26'; put '3 1 27'; put '3 1 32'; put '3 1 33'; put '3 1 34'; put '3 0-24'; put '3 0-21'; put '3 0-20'; put '3 0-19'; put '3 0-18'; put '3 0-17'; put '3 0-16'; put '3 0-15'; put '3 0-14'; put '3 0-13'; 190

put '3 0-12'; put '3 0-11'; put '3 0-10'; put '3 0-9'; put '3 0-8'; put '3 0-7'; put '3 0-6'; put '3 0-5'; put '3 0-4'; put '3 0-3'; put '3 0-2'; put '3 0-1'; put '3 0 0'; put '3 0 1'; put '3 0 2'; put '3 0 3'; put '3 0 4'; put '3 0 5'; Do n=1 to 15; put '3 0 6'; put '3 0 7'; put '3 0 8'; put '3 0 9'; put '3 0 10'; put '3 0 11'; put '3 0 12'; put '3 0 13'; put '3 0 14'; put '3 0 15'; put '3 0 16'; put '3 0 17'; put '3 0 18'; put '3 0 19'; put '3 0 20'; put '3 0 21'; put '3 0 22'; put '3 0 23'; put '3 0 24'; put '3 0 26'; put '3 0 27'; put '3 0 30'; put '4 1-21'; put '4 1-20'; put '4 1-19'; put '4 1-18'; put '4 1-17'; put '4 1-16'; put '4 1-15'; put '4 1-14'; put '4 1-13'; put '4 1-12'; put '4 1-11'; put '4 1-10'; put '4 1-9'; put '4 1-8'; put '4 1-7'; put '4 1-6'; put '4 1-5'; put '4 1-4'; put '4 1-3'; put '4 1-2'; put '4 1-1'; put '4 1 0'; put '4 1 1'; put '4 1 2'; put '4 1 3'; put '4 1 4'; put '4 1 5'; put '4 1 6'; put '4 1 7'; put '4 1 8'; put '4 1 9'; put '4 1 10'; put '4 1 11'; put '4 1 12'; put '4 1 13'; put '4 0-22'; put '4 0-20'; put '4 0-19'; put '4 0-18'; put '4 0-17'; put '4 0-16'; put '4 0-15'; put '4 0-14'; put '4 0-13'; put '4 0-12'; put '4 0-11'; put '4 0-10'; put '4 0-9'; put '4 0-8'; put '4 0-7'; put '4 0-6'; put '4 0-5'; put '4 0-4'; put '4 0-3'; put '4 0-2'; put '4 0-1'; put '4 0 0'; put '4 0 1'; put '4 0 2'; put '4 0 3'; put '4 0 4'; put '4 0 5'; put '4 0 6'; put '4 0 7'; put '4 0 8'; put '4 0 9'; put '4 0 10'; put '4 0 11'; put '4 0 12'; put '4 0 21'; put '5 1-23'; put '5 1-21'; put '5 1-20'; put '5 1-19'; put '5 1-18'; 191

put '5 1-16'; put '5 1-15'; put '5 1-14'; put '5 1-13'; put '5 1-12'; put '5 1-10'; put '5 1-9'; put '5 1-8'; put '5 1-7'; put '5 1-6'; put '5 1-4'; put '5 1-3'; put '5 1-2'; put '5 1-1'; put '5 1 6'; put '5 1 10'; put '5 1 14'; put '5 1 15'; put '5 1 17'; put '5 1 19'; put '5 1 22'; put '5 0-22'; put '5 0-21'; put '5 0-20'; put '5 0-19'; put '5 0-18'; put '5 0-13'; put '5 0-11'; put '5 0-10'; put '5 0-9'; put '5 0-8'; put '5 0-7'; put '5 0-6'; put '5 0-5'; put '5 0-4'; put '5 0-3'; put '5 0-1'; put '5 0 6'; put '6 1-22'; put '6 1-20'; put '6 1-19'; put '6 1-11'; put '6 1-9'; put '6 1-8'; put '6 1-7'; put '6 1-6'; put '6 1-5'; put '6 1-4'; put '6 1-3'; put '6 1-2'; put '6 1-1'; put '6 1 0'; put '6 1 1'; put '6 1 2'; put '6 1 3'; put '6 1 4'; put '6 1 5'; put '6 1 6'; put '6 1 7'; put '6 1 8'; put '6 1 9'; put '6 1 10'; put '6 1 11'; put '6 1 12'; put '6 1 13'; put '6 1 14'; put '6 1 15'; put '6 1 16'; put '6 1 17'; put '6 1 18'; put '6 1 19'; put '6 1 20'; put '6 1 21'; put '6 1 22'; put '6 1 23'; put '6 1 24'; put '6 1 25'; put '6 1 26'; put '6 1 27'; put '6 1 28'; put '6 1 29'; put '6 1 30'; put '6 1 31'; put '6 1 32'; put '6 1 33'; put '6 1 34'; put '6 1 35'; put '6 1 36'; put '6 1 37'; put '6 1 38'; put '6 1 39'; put '6 0-34'; put '6 0-22'; put '6 0-11'; put '6 0-10'; put '6 0-8'; put '6 0-7'; put '6 0-6'; put '6 0-5'; put '6 0-4'; put '6 0-3'; put '6 0-2'; put '6 0-1'; put '6 0 0'; put '6 0 1'; put '6 0 2'; put '6 0 3'; put '6 0 4'; put '6 0 5'; put '6 0 6'; put '6 0 7'; put '6 0 8'; put '6 0 9'; put '6 0 10'; put '6 0 11'; 192

put '6 0 13'; put '6 0 14'; put '6 0 15'; put '6 0 16'; put '6 0 17'; put '6 0 18'; put '6 0 19'; put '6 0 20'; put '6 0 21'; put '6 0 22'; put '6 0 23'; put '6 0 24'; put '6 0 30'; put '6 0 34'; put '6 0 38'; put '7 1-25'; put '7 1-24'; put '7 1-23'; put '7 1-22'; put '7 1-21'; put '7 1-20'; put '7 1-19'; put '7 1-18'; put '7 1-17'; put '7 1-16'; put '7 1-15'; put '7 1-13'; put '7 1-12'; put '7 1-11'; put '7 1-6'; put '7 0-24'; put '7 0-23'; put '7 0-22'; put '7 0-21'; put '7 0-20'; put '7 0-18'; put '7 0-16'; put '7 0-15'; put '7 0-13'; put '8 1-25'; put '8 1-24'; put '8 1-23'; put '8 1-22'; put '8 1-21'; put '8 1-20'; put '8 1-19'; put '8 1-18'; put '8 1-16'; put '8 1-15'; put '8 1-14'; put '8 1-13'; put '8 1-11'; put '8 1-10'; put '8 1-8'; put '8 1-5'; put '8 0-24'; put '8 0-23'; put '8 0-22'; put '8 0-21'; put '8 0-20'; put '8 0-19'; put '8 0-18'; put '8 0-17'; put '8 0-16'; put '8 0-15'; put '8 0-14'; put '8 0-13'; put '8 0-11'; put '8 0-9'; put '8 0-7'; Output; Run; 193